No weekend effect on outcomes of severe acute pancreatitis in Japan: data from the diagnosis procedure combination database

Comparisons of in-hospital fee and surgical outcomes between robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open radical cystectomy: a Japanese nationwide study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in-hospital fees and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC) using a Japanese nationwide database.

METHODS

All data were obtained from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2020 and March 2022. Basic characteristics and perioperative indicators, including in-hospital fees, were compared among the RARC, LRC and ORC groups. Propensity score-matched comparisons were performed to assess the differences between RARC and ORC.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2931, 1311 and 2435 cases of RARC, LRC and ORC were identified, respectively. The RARC group had the lowest in-hospital fee (median: 2.38 million yen), the shortest hospital stay (26 days) and the lowest blood transfusion rate (29.5%), as well as the lowest complication rate (20.9%), despite having the longest anesthesia time (569 min) among the three groups (all P < 0.01). The outcomes of LRC were comparable with those of RARC, and the differences in these indicators between the RARC and ORC groups were greater than those between the RARC and LRC groups. In propensity score-matched comparisons between the RARC and ORC groups, the differences in the indicators remained significant (all P < 0.01), with an ~50 000 yen difference in in-hospital fees.

CONCLUSIONS

RARC and LRC were considered to be more cost-effective surgeries than ORC due to their superior surgical outcomes and comparable surgical fees in Japan. The widespread adoption of RARC and LRC is expected to bring economic benefits to Japanese society.

Impact of the weekday of the first intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment on the survival outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study's purpose was to assess whether the weekday on which intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is initiated influences survival outcomes in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1440 patients with NPC who received IMRT were enrolled in this study between January 2010 and June 2016. The patients were divided into five groups according to the weekday of their first radiotherapy treatment. Group 1 (n = 322), Group 2 (n = 322), Group 3 (n = 286), Group 4 (n = 292) and Group 5 (n = 218) received first radiotherapy on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday respectively. Differences in the rates of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), loco-regional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were compared among the five groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in OS, DFS, LRRFS or DMFS among the five groups. The Cox regression analysis showed that the weekday on which the radiotherapy was initiated was not an independent predictor of OS (Hazard Ratio [HR], 1.056; 95%CI: 0.959-1.164, P = 0.268), DFS (HR, 1.067; 95% CI: 0.980-1.161, P = 0.137), LRRFS (HR, 1.069; 95% CI: 0.914-1.249, P = 0.404) and DMFS (HR, 1.027; 95% CI: 0.929-1.134, P = 0.607). The subgroup analysis showed no significant differences among the five groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the day of the week that patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma begin radiotherapy has no effect on their survival outcomes.

Effects of Prophylactic Antibiotics on Length of Stay and Total Costs for Pediatric Acute Pancreatitis: A Nationwide Database Study in Japan

OBJECTIVES

Acute pancreatitis (AP) guidelines for adult patients do not recommend routine prophylactic use of antibiotics because of no clinical merit on mortality, infectious complications, or length of stay. Although the mortality of pediatric AP is low, no studies have explored the rationale for antibiotic use in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of early prophylactic antibiotics on length of stay and total costs in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 2010 to 2017, we used the stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting method using propensity scores to balance the background characteristics in the antibiotics group and the control group, and compared length of stay and total costs between the groups.

RESULTS

We found significant differences between the antibiotics group (n = 652) and the control group (n = 467) in length of stay (11 days vs 9 days; percent difference, 15.4%; 95% confidence interval, 5.0%-26.8%) and total costs (US $4085 vs US $3648; percent difference, 19.8%; 95% confidence interval, 8.0%-32.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic antibiotics were associated with longer length of stay and higher total costs. Our results do not support routine use of prophylactic antibiotics in pediatric AP populations.

Acute pancreatitis and the weekend effect: does weekend admission affect patient outcome?

Introduction

When a patient is admitted to a hospital for acute pancreatitis (AP), the day of the week on which the admission occurs may influence the outcome of care. The link between reduced weekend staffing practices and outcomes for patients hospitalised for AP, however, has been inadequately studied.

Aim

To evaluate the relationship between weekend admission and AP outcome.

Material and methods

One hundred and twenty-six patients were prospectively included, assessed according to the revised Atlanta criteria, and observed until discharge or death. Weekend and weekday admissions were compared in terms of severity, aetiology, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality.

Results

Patients were divided into two groups according to the timing of admission (weekday, n = 99, 78.6%; or weekend, n = 27, 21.4%). AP was considered severe in 33 (26.2%) patients, moderately severe AP in 37 (29.4%) patients, and mild in 56 (44.4%) patients. No significant differences were found with regard to the distribution of AP severity between the two groups. The impact of weekend admission was not significant for aetiology or for the length of hospital stay (median of 9 vs. 10 days). In-hospital mortality rates were not significantly different for weekday and weekend admissions.

Conclusions

Patients admitted for hospitalisation during a weekend received the same level and quality of care at the facility under study as AP patients admitted during the week. Additionally, the rate of favourable outcomes for patients admitted during the weekend was found to be similar to the outcomes of patients admitted on a weekday.

Seven-day services in surgery and the "weekend effect" at a Japanese teaching hospital: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hospitals deliver 24-h, 7-day care on a 5-day workweek model, as fewer resources are available on weekends. In prior studies, poorer outcomes have been observed with weekend admission or surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of 7-day service at a hospital, including outpatient consultations, diagnostic examinations and elective surgeries, on the likelihood of the "weekend effect" in surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgery between April 2014 and October 2016 at an academic medical centre in Tokyo, Japan. The main outcome measure was 30-day in-hospital mortality from the index surgery. The characteristics of the participants were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or the chi-squared test as appropriate. Logistic regression was used to test for differences in the mortality rate between the two groups, and propensity score adjustments were made.

RESULTS

A total of 7442 surgeries were identified, of which, 1386 (19%) took place on the weekend. Of the 947 emergency surgeries, 25% (235) were performed on the weekend. The mortality following emergency weekday surgery was 21‰ (15/712), compared with 55‰ (13/235) following weekend surgery. Of the 6495 elective surgeries, 18% (1151) were performed on the weekend. The mortality following elective weekday surgery was 2.3‰ (12/5344), compared with 0.87‰ (1/1151) following weekend surgery. After adjustment, weekend surgeries were associated with an increased risk of death, especially in the emergency setting (emergency odds ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.2-6.5 vs. elective odds ratio: 0.4, 95% confidence interval: 0.05-3.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing emergency surgery on the weekend had higher 30-day mortality, but showed no difference in elective surgery mortality. These findings have potential implications for health administrators and policy makers who may try to restructure the hospital workweek or consider weekend elective surgery.

Comparison of Perioperative Complications Between Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Laminoplasty For Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Propensity Score-matching Analysis Using Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study with a large national database.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the perioperative complications and costs of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) for patients who had cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

CSM is the most common spinal cord disorder in the upper middle-aged people in Japan. ADF and LAMP represent 2 major treatments; however, few studies have reported large-scale investigations for perioperative complications with CSM. Thus, it is controversial which surgical approach will lead to the best clinical outcome in CSM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All data in this study were collected from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database for patients diagnosed with CSM. We adjusted for known confounding biases with propensity score matching. One-to-one matched pairs between each surgical procedure were analyzed for the purposes of comparing systemic complication rates, local complication rates, medical costs, and mortality.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 1638 pairs of patients undergoing ADF and LAMP were made. More perioperative systemic complications were observed in the ADF group, such as atrial fibrillation (ADF/LAMP=0.7%/0.2%, P=0.032), respiratory failure (1.4%/0.1%, P<0.001), dysphagia (2.2%/0.2%, P<0.001), and sepsis (0.5%/0.1%, P=0.019). In contrast, a high rate of pulmonary embolism was observed with LAMP groups (ADF/LAMP=0%/0.2%, P=0.045). Local complications, such as infection (ADF/LAMP=0.8%/1.7%, P=0.026) and meningitis (0%/0.2%, P<0.045), were more common in the LAMP group. Conversely, spinal fluid leakage (ADF/LAMP=0.6%/0%, P=0.003) was more common in the ADF group. The costs (P<0.001) were higher in the ADF group.

CONCLUSIONS

More systemic complications, such as respiratory disease, cardiovascular events, and sepsis, were observed in the ADF group, although local infection was more frequently seen in the LAMP group. Medical costs were higher in the ADF group. The findings in this study will contribute to each CSM patient by allowing suitable adaptation of cervical surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Hospital-Volume Effects on Perioperative Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Implantation: Analysis of 2,505 Cases

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding volume-outcome effects on peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter implantation is limited. This study aimed to investigate associations between hospital volume (annual caseload of catheter implantation) and perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

Clinical data for patients who underwent PD catheter implantation from 2007 to 2012 were extracted from the Japanese nationwide Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. Hospital volume was divided into tertiles: low-volume (1 - 6 cases/year), medium-volume (7 - 13 cases/year), and high-volume (≥ 14 cases/year). Multivariate logistic regression analysis for the occurrence of any adverse events and blood transfusion, and gamma-distributed log-linked linear regression analysis for postoperative length of stay were conducted with explanatory variables of hospital volume, age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, history of hemodialysis, type of anesthesia, and type of hospital.

RESULTS

Among 906, 855, and 744 cases in the low-volume, medium-volume, and high-volume groups, overall adverse events were 10.0%, 7.6%, and 6.0%, transfusion rates were 1.3%, 1.1%, and 0.9%, and median postoperative stays were 12, 10, and 9 days, respectively. In multivariate analyses, compared with the low-volume group, medium-volume and high-volume groups were associated with a lower incidence of overall adverse events (odds ratio [OR] = 0.71, p = 0.058, and OR = 0.59, p = 0.013, respectively) and shorter postoperative stay (% difference = -10.5%, p = 0.023, and % difference = -18.5%, p = 0.001, respectively), while no significant association was detected for transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Less frequent adverse events and shorter stays were observed in higher-volume centers. Inverse volume-outcome relationships in PD catheter implantation were confirmed.

No Association of Timing of Endoscopic Biliary Drainage with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Non-severe Acute Cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Biliary drainage via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the first-line treatment for acute cholangitis. Despite the established effectiveness of urgent biliary drainage in patients with severe acute cholangitis, the indication of this procedure for non-severe acute cholangitis is controversial.

AIMS

To assess the safety of elective drainage (≥ 12 h of admission) for non-severe acute cholangitis.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 461 patients with non-severe acute cholangitis who underwent endoscopic biliary drainage. Using linear regression models with adjustment for a variety of potential confounders, we compared elective versus urgent biliary drainage (< 12 h of admission) in terms of clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the length of stay.

RESULTS

There were 98 and 201 patients who underwent elective and urgent biliary drainage, respectively. The median length of stay was 11 days in both groups (P = 0.52). The timing of ERCP was not associated with length of stay in the multivariable model (P = 0.52). Secondary outcomes including in-hospital mortality and recurrence of cholangitis were not different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective biliary drainage was not associated with worse clinical outcomes of non-severe acute cholangitis as compared to urgent drainage. Further investigation is warranted to justify the elective drainage for non-severe cholangitis.

Weekend Effect in Acute Pancreatitis-Related Hospital Admissions in the United States: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the difference in overall outcomes between weekend admissions for acute pancreatitis (AP) and weekday admissions.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2012, data were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample on adult patients with AP. Exclusion criteria were applied for chronic pancreatitis and other pancreatic and biliary malignancies. In-hospital mortality, length of stay, hospitalization costs, comorbidities, complications, and intervention rates were compared between the weekend and weekday admissions.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were a total of 432,303 weekday admissions and 147,435 weekend admissions for AP in the United States hospitals. Weekend AP admissions were more likely to develop alcohol withdrawal (5.9% vs 5.7%, P = 0.001) and ileus (4.1% vs 3.1%, P = 0.04). They were also more likely to develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (4.7% vs 4.4%, P < 0.001) and required more endotracheal intubation (3.9% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001). There was no significant in-hospital mortality difference between the weekend and weekday admissions on both univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekend AP admissions develop more severe complications requiring intensive care. Despite this, there was no weekend effect for in-hospital mortality for AP-related admissions.

Incidence and Predictors of Readmissions in Acute Pancreatitis: A Nationwide Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common cause for hospitalization, and readmission is common, with variable associated risk factors for readmission. Here, we assessed the incidence and risk factors for readmission in AP in a large national database.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the National Readmission Database during the year 2013. Index admissions with a primary discharge diagnosis of AP using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification were identified from January to November to identify 30-day readmission rates. Demographic, hospital, and clinical diagnoses were included in multivariate regression analysis to identify readmission risk factors.

RESULTS

We identified 243,816 index AP discharges with 39,623 (16.2%) readmitted within 30 days. The most common reason for readmission was recurrent AP (41.5%). Increased odds of all-cause readmission were associated with younger age, nonhome discharge, increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index, and increased length of stay. Cholecystectomy during index admission was associated with reduced all-cause and recurrent AP readmissions (odds ratios of 0.5, and 0.35, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission for AP is common, most often due to recurrent AP. Multiple factors, including cholecystectomy, during index admission, are associated with significantly reduced odds of all-cause and recurrent AP readmissions.

Weekend effect in non-elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Background

The ‘weekend effect’ describes the phenomenon where patient outcomes appear worse for those admitted at the weekend. It has been used recently to justify significant changes in UK health policy. Recent evidence has suggested that the effect may be due to a combination of inadequate correction for confounding factors and inaccurate coding. The effects of these factors were investigated in patients with acute abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

Methods

Patients undergoing non‐elective AAA repair entered into the UK National Vascular Registry from January 2013 until December 2015 were included in a case–control study. The patients were divided according to whether they were treated during the week (Monday 08.00 hours to Friday 17.00 hours) or at the weekend. Data extracted included demographics, co‐morbidities, preoperative medications and baseline blood test results, as well as outcomes. Coding issues were investigated by looking at patients treated for ruptured, symptomatic or asymptomatic AAA within the non‐elective cohort. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of inpatient stay, and cardiac, respiratory and renal complications.

Results

The mortality rate appeared to be higher at the weekend (odds ratio (OR) 1·69, 95 per cent c.i. 1·47 to 1·94; P < 0·001), but this effect disappeared when confounding factors and coding issues were corrected for (corrected OR for ruptured AAA 1·09, 0·92 to 1·29; P = 0·330). Differences in outcomes were similar for prolonged length of hospital stay (uncorrected OR 1·21, 95 per cent c.i. 1·06 to 1·37, P = 0·005; corrected OR for ruptured AAA 1·06, 0·91 to 1·10, P = 0·478), and morbidity outcomes.

Conclusion

After appropriate correction for confounding factors and coding effects, there was no evidence of a significant weekend effect in the treatment of non‐elective AAA in the UK.

Comparing mortality risk of patients with acute hip fractures admitted to a major trauma centre on a weekday or weekend

Proximal femoral fractures are a major public health concern with estimated annual direct and social costs amounting to £2 billion and average 30-day mortality risk of 7.5%. In response to the recent debate over out-of-hours hospital provision we investigated the ‘weekend effect’ at a major trauma centre, caring for acute injuries. A single centre, multi-surgeon review of 2060 patients performed. The distribution of patient and treatment variables compared in patients admitted on a weekday or the weekend. Fewer patients met performance indicators during weekend admission, time to surgery (63 vs. 71%) and time to geriatric review (86 vs. 91%). Weekend admission 30-day mortality was marginally lower than weekday (9.7% vs. 10.2%, OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.32, p = 0.7383). Increasing age, female gender, co-morbidities and confusion increased mortality risk. Binary regression analysis including these variables found no significant ‘weekend effect’. Despite the unit observing an increasing workload in the last five years, with meticulous workforce planning, senior doctor provisions and careful use of resources, it is possible to provide a seven-day fracture neck of femur service with no variation in thirty-day mortality by the day of admission.