Combinational use of hepatitis B viral antigens predicts responses to nucleos(t)ide analogue/peg-interferon sequential therapy

The efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon α-2b-based immunotherapy for inactive hepatitis B surface antigen carriers

OBJECTIVES

Pegylated interferon α-2b (PegIFNα-2b) therapy can help inactive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers (IHCs) achieve clinical cure. To explore and compare the efficacy, safety, and relevant influential factors of PegIFNα-2b monotherapy and PegIFNα-2b-based immunotherapy for IHCs.

METHODS

This exploratory, prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled 40 IHCs who were randomized into group A (PegIFNα-2b treatment for 68 weeks) and group B (two cycles of PegIFNα-2b treatment with a lead-in period of GM-CSF and vaccine treatment before each cycle). The primary endpoint was 68-week HBsAg loss rate.

RESULTS

At week 68, the HBsAg loss rates were 45.45% [full analysis set (FAS)] and 46.67% [per-protocol set (PPS)]. There was no statistically significant difference in HBsAg loss rate between groups A and B ( P  > 0.05). Univariate analysis revealed that age ≤40 years old, baseline HBsAg <200 IU/ml, and 24-week HBsAg decline ≥2 log 10 IU/ml were significantly associated with HBsAg loss in FAS population ( P  < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that only 24-week HBsAg decline ≥2 log 10 IU/ml was the independent influencing factor in both FAS and PPS populations ( P  < 0.05). The adverse events were common and mild, and the therapies were well-tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of IHCs with PegIFNα-2b-based therapy could result in a high HBsAg loss rate. The HBsAg loss rate of combined immunotherapy was similar to that of PegIFNα-2b monotherapy, and the safety was good.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV ID

NCT05451420.

A critique and systematic review of the clinical utility of hepatitis B core-related antigen

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a new biomarker for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) whose performance has not been critically or systematically appraised. Herein, we performed a systematic review to determine its clinical utility.

METHODS

We evaluated the biological pathway of HBcrAg and performed a systematic review of PubMed for clinical trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies that evaluated the clinical utility of HBcrAg. The effectiveness of HBcrAg in predicting HBV-specific clinical events (e.g. HBeAg seroconversion, phases of CHB, HBsAg loss, treatment response, and relapse after stopping therapy) was examined using receiver-operating characteristic curves. The correlation coefficients of HBcrAg with HBV DNA, quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg), HBV RNA, and cccDNA were summarised from published studies. Median values were used as estimates.

RESULTS

HBcrAg consists of three precore/core protein products: HBcAg, HBeAg, and a 22 kDa precore protein. HBcrAg assays have been associated with false-positive rates of 9.3% and false-negative rates of between 12-35% for CHB. The new iTACT-HBcrAg is more sensitive but does not reduce the false-positive rate. A PubMed search found 248 papers on HBcrAg, of which 59 were suitable for analysis. The clinical performance of HBcrAg was evaluated using AUROC analyses, with median AUROCs of 0.860 for HBeAg seroconversion, 0.867 for predicting HBeAg(-) hepatitis, 0.645 for HBsAg loss, 0.757 for treatment response, and 0.688 for relapse after stopping therapy. The median correlation coefficient (r) was 0.630 with HBV DNA, 0.414 with qHBsAg, 0.619 with HBV RNA and 0.550 with cccDNA. Correlation decreased during antiviral therapy, but combined biomarkers improved performance.

CONCLUSIONS

HBcrAg has a mixed performance and has a poor correlation with HBsAg loss and antiviral therapy, hence HBcrAg results should be interpreted with caution.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) has been used to assess management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) without a systematic and critical Sreview of its performance. Our finding that HBcrAg had a false-positive rate of 9% and a false-negative rate of 12-35% raises concerns, although larger studies are needed for validation. A systematic review showed that the performance of HBcrAg was variable depending on the CHB endpoint; it was excellent at predicting HBeAg seroconversion and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis (vs. chronic infection), which should be its main use, but it was poor for relapse after stopping antiviral therapy and for HBsAg loss. HBcrAg results should be interpreted with considerable caution, particularly by physicians, researchers, guideline committees and agencies that approve diagnostic tests.

Consolidation treatment needed for sustained HBsAg-negative response induced by interferon-alpha in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B patients

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance is considered as functional cure in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to assess the durability of HBsAg clearance achieved by interferon-based therapies in patients with CHB who were originally positive for hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg). In this prospective study, HBeAg-positive CHB patients with confirmed HBsAg loss under interferon-based therapies were enrolled within 12 weeks from end of treatment and followed up for 48 weeks. Virological markers, biochemical indicators, and liver imaging examinations were observed every 3–6 months. Sustained functional cure was analysed as primary outcome. Factor associated with sustained HBsAg loss or reversion was also investigated. The rate of HBsAg loss sustainability was 91.8% (212/231). Patients receiving consolidation treatment for 12–24 weeks or ≥ 24 weeks had higher rates of sustained HBsAg negativity than those receiving consolidation treatment for < 12 weeks (98.3% and 91.2% vs. 86.7%, P ​= ​0.068), and the former groups had significantly higher anti-HBs levels than the later (P ​< ​0.05). The cumulative incidence of HBsAg reversion and HBV DNA reversion was 8.2% and 3.9%, respectively. Consolidation treatment of ≥ 12 weeks [odd ratio (OR) 3.318, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.077–10.224, P ​= ​0.037) was a predictor of sustained functional cure, and HBeAg-positivity at cessation of treatment (OR 12.271, 95% CI 1.076–139.919, P ​= ​0.043) was a predictor of HBsAg reversion. Interferon-alpha induced functional cure was durable and a consolidation treatment of ≥ 12–24 weeks was needed after HBsAg loss in HBeAg-positive CHB patients.

•

It is a large prospective study of clinical cure in HBeAg-positive CHB patients.

•

It showed the functional cure induced by interferon-alpha was durable.

•

The extended IFN therapy is critical for HBsAg loss in HBeAg-positive CHB patients.

•

Therapy of IFN consolidation ≥12–24 weeks is necessary in the clinical cure of CHB.

Hepatitis B: Who should be treated?-managing patients with chronic hepatitis B during the immune-tolerant and immunoactive phases

New hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections are decreasing owing to improved antiviral therapy and increased HBV vaccination worldwide; however, the number of HBV infections remains a major cause of liver carcinogenesis. HBV triggers cytotoxic immunity to eliminate HBV-infected cells. Therefore, the HBV pathophysiology changes in persistently infected individuals depending on host immune responses and HBV DNA proliferation state. To prevent liver cirrhosis and carcinogenesis caused by HBV, it is important to treat HBV infection at an early stage. Active treatment is recommended for the immunoactive hepatitis B surface-antigen-positive and -negative phase, but not during the immune-inactive phase or immune-tolerant phase; instead, follow-up is recommended. However, these patients should be monitored through regular blood tests to accurately diagnose the immune-inactive or -tolerant phases. The treatment regimen should be determined based on the age, sex, family history of liver cancer, and liver fibrosis status of patients. Early treatment is often recommended due to various problems during the immune-tolerant phase. This review compares the four major international practice guidelines, including those from the Japanese Society of Hepatology, and discusses strategies for chronic hepatitis B treatment during the immune-tolerant, immune-inactive, and resolved phases. Finally, recommended hepatitis B antiviral therapy and follow-up protocols are discussed.

Update on the management and treatment of viral hepatitis

This review aims to summarize the current evidence on the treatment of viral hepatitis, focusing on its clinical management. Also, future treatment options and areas of potential research interest are detailed. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for primary studies published within the last ten years. Keywords included hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus (HDV), hepatitis E virus, and treatment. Outcomes reported in the studies were summarized, tabulated, and synthesized. Significant advances in viral hepatitis treatment were accomplished, such as the advent of curative therapies for hepatitis C and the development and improvement of hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and hepatitis E vaccination. Drugs that cure hepatitis B, going beyond viral suppression, are so far unavailable; however, targeted antiviral drugs against HBV (immunomodulatory therapies and gene silencing technologies) are promising approaches to eradicating the virus. Ultimately, high vaccination coverage and large-scale test-and-treat programmes with high screening rates may eliminate viral hepatitis and mitigate their burden on health systems. The development of curative hepatitis C treatment renewed the enthusiasm for curing hepatitis B, albeit further investigation is required. Novel therapeutic options targeting HDV life cycle are currently under clinical investigation.

Entecavir add-on Peg-interferon therapy plays a positive role in reversing hepatic fibrosis in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients: a prospective and randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) add-on peg-interferon therapy compared with ETV monotherapy in treatment-naïve hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients remains controversial. We investigated whether adding peg-interferon to ongoing ETV treatment leads to a better curative effect or not.

METHODS

All patients have been recruited between August 2013 and January 2015 from the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Zhongshan Hospital (China). Eligible HBV patients (n = 144) were randomly divided (1:1) to receive either ETV monotherapy (n = 70) or peg-interferon add-on therapy from week 26 to 52 (n = 74). Patients were followed-up for at least 2 years. Indexes including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion rate, sustained virologic response, transient elastography value, and histological scores were evaluated every 3 months until the end of the study. The rate of patients with HBsAg loss was defined as the primary endpoint criteria.

RESULTS

At week 26, no patient achieved HBsAg seroconversion in either group. At week 52, one patient in the monotherapy group was HBsAg-negative but there was none in the combination therapy group. The monotherapy group showed significantly better liver function recovery results than the combination therapy group. At week 78, one patient in the combination group had HBsAg seroconverted. At week 104, only three patients in the combination therapy group were HBsAg-negative compared with one patient in monotherapy. The mean alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels and transient elastography values decreased significantly compared with baseline. Both groups showed a favorable decrease in alpha-fetoprotein (monotherapy: 4.5 [2.8, 7.1] vs. 2.2 [1.8, 3.1] ng/mL, P < 0.001; combination therapy: 5.7 [3.0, 18.8] vs. 3.2 [2.0, 4.3] ng/mL, P < 0.001) and an improved result of liver biopsy examination scores. The combination group showed a better improvement in histology compared with the monotherapy group (mean transient elastography value 6.6 [4.9, 9.8] vs. 7.8 [5.4, 11.1] kPa, P = 0.028). But there was no significant difference in HBsAg conversion rate (1.8% [1/56] vs. 4.1% [3/73], P = 0.809) and HBeAg conversion rate (12.5% [7/56] vs. 11.0% [8/73], P = 0.787), as well as HBV-DNA, sustained virologic response (93.2% vs. 98.5%, P = 0.150) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both therapies supported liver function recovery and histology improvement. Combination therapy did not show better anti-viral efficacy in HBsAg or HBeAg seroconversion compared with monotherapy. However, combination therapy played a more positive role in reversing hepatic fibrosis compared with monotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02849132; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02849132.

Hepatitis b infection: progress in identifying patients most likely to respond to peginterferon alfa

Introduction: Despite the disadvantage of side effects, pegylated interferon alpha (Peg-IFN α) remains an indispensable agent for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) due to its immunomodulatory effect. The selection of a patient most likely to have a favorable response becomes an essential issue for Peg-IFN α therapy.Areas covered: Recent progress in the prediction of the treatment response to Peg-IFN α.Expert opinion: Before Peg-IFN α therapy, baseline host and viral factors, including female sex, younger age, a high alanine aminotransferase level, HBV genotype A or B, and low viral load, predict a favorable response. In addition, on-treatment viral kinetics of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), e antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA help clinicians determine whether to continue or discontinue Peg-IFN α therapy. The novel HBV markers hepatitis B core-related antigen and HBV RNA have recently been investigated as useful predictors. The limited efficacy of Peg-IFN α monotherapy facilitated the development of new strategies of 'add-on' or 'switch to' Peg-IFN α in patients receiving long-term nucleot(s)ide analog treatment, which may lead to an increase in HBeAg and HBsAg loss. In summary, tailored Peg-IFN α therapeutic strategies based on predictors extended the landscape for CHB treatment.

Combination of Entecavir or Tenofovir with Pegylated Interferon-α for Long-Term Reduction in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Levels: Simultaneous, Sequential, or Add-on Combination Therapy

Seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (“functional cure”) is the optimal endpoint of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Currently available anti-HBV therapy includes nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NAs) and peginterferon-α (Peg-IFNα). Combination of NAs and Peg-IFNα, each with different mechanisms of action, is an attractive approach for treating chronic HBV infection. In earlier studies, compared with monotherapy using IFNα, combination therapy showed greater on-treatment HBV DNA suppression but no difference in the sustained response. However, responses to the combination of non-pegylated IFNα with lamivudine or adefovir were not assessed based on HBsAg quantification but were defined by normal alanine aminotransferase levels, testing negative for hepatitis B e-antigen, and low HBV DNA load over a short term. Here, we reviewed previous reports regarding the effects of combination therapy of entecavir or tenofovir with Peg-IFNα, focusing on long-term reduction in HBsAg levels. Regimens of combination therapy were classified into “simultaneous” combination (“de novo” strategy); “sequential” combination, which involved starting with one therapy followed by the other (“switch-to” strategy); “add-on” combination, which involved adding Peg-IFNα to an ongoing NAs. Some studies have shown promising results, but there is no robust evidence that combination therapy is superior to monotherapy. Large studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of combination therapies to increase the rates of HBsAg seroclearance over the long term.

Pilot study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and pegylated interferon-alpha 2a add-on therapy in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

A prospective pilot study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and pegylated interferon alpha 2a (P-IFN) add-on therapy was conducted to evaluate its efficacy in reducing viral antigen levels in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B (UMIN 000020179).

METHODS

Patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving maintenance TDF therapy and exhibiting hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level > 800 IU/ml were divided into two arms. P-IFN was added for 48 weeks in the add-on arm (n = 32), while TDF monotherapy was maintained in the control arm (n = 51). Both groups were followed for 96 weeks after baseline measurements.

RESULTS

Almost all patients in the control arm displayed a slow and constant reduction in HBsAg during follow-up. In contrast, roughly half of the add-on arm exhibited a sharp decline in HBsAg during P-IFN administration, which disappeared after halting P-IFN. At 96 weeks after baseline, 41% (13/32) of patients in the add-on arm had shown a rapid decrease in HBsAg, versus 2% (1/51) in the control arm (p < 0.001). Add-on therapy and increased cytotoxic T-cell response were significant factors associated with a rapid decrease in HBsAg according to multivariate analysis. In addition, higher HB core-related antigen (HBcrAg) level at baseline (p = 0.001) and add-on therapy (p = 0.036) were significant factors associated with a rapid reduction in HBcrAg.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF and P-IFN add-on therapy in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B facilitated rapid decreases in HBsAg and HBcrAg. Further studies are needed to improve early HBsAg clearance rate.

Monitoring of serum HBV RNA, HBcrAg, HBsAg and anti-HBc levels in patients during long-term nucleoside/nucleotide analogue therapy

BACKGROUND

This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical significance of serum HBV RNA, hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) levels in chronic hepatitis B patients with undetectable HBV DNA during nucleoside/nucleotide analogue (NA) treatment.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients who received long-term NA treatment of median 5.83 (25%, 75% percentiles 4.67, 7.75) years were enrolled, and 285 serum samples at five time points for each patient were quantitatively analysed for the three serum markers together with serum HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels.

RESULTS

The HBV RNA level significantly correlated with HBcrAg (r=0.629; P<0.001) but not HBsAg levels (P=0.1460). Nonetheless, the HBcrAg level significantly correlated with the HBsAg level (r=0.469; P<0.001). Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive samples showed higher HBV RNA, HBcrAg and HBsAg levels than HBeAg-negative samples did (all P<0.05). Nine patients with HBeAg loss manifested a significantly greater decline in HBV RNA and HBcrAg levels (median 1.84 [25%, 75% percentiles 1.02, 2.12] log₁₀ copies/ml, 1.14 [0.62, 2.21] log₁₀ U/ml, respectively) compared with those in seven patients without HBeAg loss (0.74 [0.10, 1.08] log₁₀ copies/ml and 0.41 [0.21, 0.69] log₁₀ U/ml, respectively). Overall, serum HBV RNA, HBcrAg, HBsAg and anti-HBc levels gradually decreased with time during NA treatment. At the end of observation, HBV RNA and HBcrAg reached an undetectable level in 26 and 6 (46% and 11%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring of HBV RNA and HBcrAg levels is useful for NA-treated patients with undetectable HBV DNA. The attainment of HBV RNA undetectability usually occurs prior to HBcrAg undetectability.

Possible Relevance of PNPLA3 and TLL1 Gene Polymorphisms to the Efficacy of PEG-IFN Therapy for HBV-Infected Patients

Lifestyle changes have led to an increase in the number of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, the effects of NAFLD-associated single-nucleotide gene polymorphisms (SNPs) in HBV-infected patients have not been adequately investigated. Methods: We investigated the association of the NAFLD-related SNPs patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3; rs738409), transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2; rs58542926), 17-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 13 (HSD17B13; rs72613567, rs6834314 and rs62305723), membrane-bound O-acyltransferase domain containing 7 (MBOAT7; rs641738) and glucokinase regulatory protein (GCKR; rs1260326) with the presence of histologically proven hepatic steatosis (HS) in HBV-infected patients (n = 224). We also investigated tolloid-like 1 (TLL1) SNP (rs17047200), which has been reported to be involved in the disease progression in Japanese NAFLD patients, and evaluated the association of HS and various SNPs with the treatment efficacy of pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) monotherapy following nucleotide/nucleoside (NA) treatment (NA/PEG-IFN sequential therapy; n = 64). Among NAFLD-associated SNPs evaluated, only the PNPLA3 SNP was significantly associated with the presence of hepatic steatosis in a total of 224 HBV-infected patients (P = 1.0 × 10⁻⁴). Regarding the sequential therapy, PNPLA3 SNP and TLL1 SNP were related to the treatment efficacy, and patients without minor alleles of these SNPs showed favorable results with a high virologic response and significant reduction in their HBsAg titer. A multivariate analysis showed that HBeAg positivity (odds ratio 5.810, p = 0.016) and the absence of a risk allele in PNPLA3 and TLL1 SNPs (odds ratio 8.664, p = 0.0042) were significantly associated with treatment efficacy. The PNPLA3 SNP might be associated with the presence of HS, and the combination of the PNPLA3 and TLL1 SNPs might be related to the efficacy of PEG-IFN monotherapy following NA treatment.

HBcAg distribution predicts virologic response to PEG-IFNα therapy in HBeAg-positive CHB with minimally elevated ALT

Aim: This study evaluated the use of initial Hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antigen (HBcAg) distribution in hepatocytes to predict chronic infection with HBV patients with minimally elevated ALT who can achieve viral response to PEG-IFNα therapy. Materials & methods: HBeAg-positive chronic infection with HBV patients with minimally elevated ALT who were treated with PEG-IFNα were enrolled. Predictive values of initial HBcAg distribution in hepatocytes were evaluated. Results: HBcAg of no-end-of-treatment viral response group was more likely to be distributed in hepatocyte nuclei (p = 0.02) and exhibited a higher degree of HBcAg expression in nuclei (p < 0.0001) before treatment. The degree of HBcAg expression in nuclei might be a better predictor of end-of-treatment viral response (area under the curve: 0.88). Conclusion: Lower HBcAg expressions in nuclei correspond to higher possibilities of patients benefiting from PEG-IFNα treatment.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection: 2018 Guidelines from the Canadian Association for the Study of Liver Disease and Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important public health problem in Canada. In keeping with evolving evidence and understanding of HBV pathogenesis, the Canadian Association for the Study of Liver Disease periodically publishes HBV management guidelines. The goals of the 2018 guidelines are to (1) highlight the public health impact of HBV infection in Canada and the need to improve diagnosis and linkage to care, (2) recommend current best-practice guidelines for treatment of HBV, (3) summarize the key HBV laboratory diagnostic tests, and (4) review evidence on HBV management in special patient populations and include more detail on management of HBV in pediatric populations. An overview of novel HBV tests and therapies for HBV in development is provided to highlight the recent advances in HBV clinical research. The aim and scope of these guidelines are to serve as an up-to-date, comprehensive resource for Canadian health care providers in the management of HBV infection.