Correction to: Efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in HCV-infected Japanese patients with prior DAA experience, severe renal impairment, or genotype 3 infection

Patient and physician preferences for treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in Japan: a discrete choice experiment

AIMS

This study was performed to evaluate patients' and physicians' preferences regarding hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in Japan, particularly focusing on direct-acting antivirals. Understanding these preferences is important for maintaining adherence to treatment necessary for achieving HCV elimination.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment was conducted to identify patients' and physicians' preferences for HCV treatment in Japan. Eligible participants completed a preference survey via an online questionnaire. Eight attributes and their respective levels - pertaining to dosing regimen/schedule, safety, and out-of-pocket costs - were identified. The primary and secondary endpoints were the relative attribute importance (RAI) and utility value of attribute levels, which were compared between patients and physicians to highlight differences.

RESULTS

Both patients (n = 95) and physicians (n = 118) showed the greatest concern for total out-of-pocket treatment costs, followed by safety risks. While patients and physicians generally shared similar treatment preferences, patients placed a higher RAI on total out-of-pocket costs than did physicians (50.4% vs. 39.4%). Conversely, patients assigned lower RAI values to the risks of nasopharyngitis and pruritus (15.2% vs. 17.9% and 11.7% vs. 16.2%, respectively). The RAI for the number of tablets taken daily was higher than that for treatment duration among patients (11.6% vs. 0.2%), but nearly equal among physicians.

LIMITATIONS

The study had potential non-response bias, physicians not being actual care providers for surveyed patients, a small sample size, reliance on predefined DCE attributes, and limited participant diversity from online panels.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance of patient-centered care in HCV treatment and the need to raise awareness of the public subsidy for hepatitis, and to ensure an effective access scheme for the patients. Simplifying regimens like once-daily pills and minimal monitoring may enhance treatment convenience. Improved patient-physician communication supports optimized strategies, aiding Japan's goal of HCV elimination by 2030.

Viral and host factors are associated with retreatment failure in hepatitis C patients receiving all-oral direct antiviral therapy

AIM

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus is associated with high sustained virologic response rates. However, patients for whom DAA therapy fails acquire resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). We therefore evaluated the efficacy of DAA retreatment and factors associated with retreatment failure.

METHODS

Non-structural 5A RASs were investigated at the start of DAA therapy and at treatment failure in 64 patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b for whom DAA combination therapy had failed. A total of 59 patients were introduced to DAA retreatment. The factors associated with retreatment failure were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 20 of 43 (46.5%) daclatasvir + asunaprevir-treated patients with virologic failure had no RASs at baseline, and three (15%) acquired P32 deletion RASs. Four of seven sofosbuvir/ledipasvir-treated patients with virologic failure had more than two RASs of NS5A at baseline. The sustained virologic response rates on retreatment were as follows: sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, 81.8%; with elbasvir + grazoprevir, 0%; and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, 87.5%. Patients for whom sofosbuvir/ledipasvir or elbasvir + grazoprevir failed achieved sustained virologic response with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. Two of three patients for whom glecaprevir/pibrentasvir retreatment failed had Q24/L28/R30 and A92K RASs; the other had P32 deletion RAS at baseline. Interestingly, 10 of 11 patients with retreatment failure had the interleukin (IL)-28B single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) minor allele. A multivariate analysis showed that the IL28B SNP minor allele (P = 0.005, odds ratio 28.291) was an independent risk factor for retreatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to viral factors (e.g. Q24, L28, R30, and A92 or P32 deletion RASs), host factors (e.g. IL28B SNP) are associated with DAA retreatment failure.

Effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir ± ribavirin vs glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in genotype 3 hepatitis C virus infected patients

Objectives

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir±ribavirin (SOF/VEL±RBV) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) are the drug combinations of choice for treating individuals with genotype 3 hepatitis C virus (G3-HCV) infection. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of SOF/VEL±RBV compared with GLE/PIB for treating G3-HCV infection under routine clinical practice conditions.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of individuals with G3-HCV infection who initiated treatment with SOF/VEL +/-RBV or GLE/PIB between April 2017 and July 2018. Prisoners and children were excluded. The outcome variable of effectiveness was sustained virological response 12 weeks after completing treatment (SVR12). The safety variable was withdrawal secondary to severe adverse events (SAEs). Covariates included sex, age, HIV co-infection, previous liver transplant, cirrhosis, hepatic fibrosis and previous antiviral treatment. Statistical significance was calculated using Fisher's exact test or the Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results

A total of 76 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 46 were treated with SOF/VEL±RBV and 30 were treated with GLE/PIB. No baseline differences were observed between treatment groups with respect to age, sex, HIV co-infection, fibrosis stage, cirrhosis and previous antiviral treatment. Of the patients treated with SOF/VEL±RBV and GLE/PIB, 95.7% and 96.7% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.7). Of patients with and without cirrhosis, 83.3% and 98.4% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.09). Of the patients with low-grade hepatic fibrosis (F0-2) and advanced fibrosis (F3-4), 100% and 85.7% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.03). In treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients, 95.7% and 100% reached SVR12, respectively (P=0.57), without significant differences independent of the treatment group (P=0.28 for SOF/VEL±RBV; P=0.18 for GLE/PIB). The incidence of AEs was 21.1% (95% CI 11.3% to 30.9%). None of the patients developed an SAE or required antiviral treatment withdrawal.

Conclusions

SOF/VEL±RBV or GLE/PIB are safe and effective for treating G3-HCV-infections, with a lower effectiveness in patients with advanced fibrosis F3-4.

Hepatitis C virus infection could affect the pathogenesis of ischemic heart diseases in northern Japan

AIMS

Previously, our group reported that lymphotropic hepatitis C virus (HCV) could induce various kinds of immune dysfunctions. The immune dysfunctions could cause vascular disease by inducing cryoglobulinemia. It has been reported that ischemic heart diseases might be caused by HCV. However, the infectious rate of HCV in patients with ischemic heart disease has not been clarified in northern Japan. Therefore, we tried to determine the rate of HCV infectivity in patients with ischemic heart disease.

METHODS

The target patients of this study were automatically selected using an electronic medical record system to exclude selection bias. The system identified 16 484 patients with ischemic heart disease who were included in this study. In addition, 12 902 subjects who had received medical checkups were included as the control group.

RESULTS

The positive rate of HCV antibody among the patients with ischemic disease in our hospital was 2.58%, which was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than in the medical checkup patients (0.84%). The positive rate of HCV antibody in the patients with ischemic heart disease in each age group was significantly higher than in the corresponding age groups of the medical checkup patients. The rate of chronic kidney disease in HCV antibody-positive patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was significantly higher than in HCV antibody-negative patients treated by PCI (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis C virus infection might be associated with the pathogenesis of ischemic heart disease and HCV antibody positivity might be a risk factor for ischemic heart disease in northern Japan.