Local infiltration analgesia: a 2-year follow-up of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

Efficacy of local infiltration analgesia on recovery after total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach under spinal anaesthesia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

The utilization of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) is a common practice in total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures to mitigate postoperative pain and diminish the necessity for opioids. However, contemporary literature reports conflicting results. Our working hypothesis was that LIA renders better postoperative VAS-scores and reduces the need for oral analgetics. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aimed at examining the effectiveness of LIA in THA. A total of 90 patients were included for statistical analysis. Our primary endpoint was the Visual Analogue Scale, VAS, (0: no pain, 10: unbearable pain) preoperatively, at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 12th hour postoperative intervals and at discharge. Our secondary endpoints included the postoperative opioid consumption, as well as patient satisfaction at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively, measured using the Numeric Rating Scale, NRS. LIA has a tendency for superior results regarding VAS- Scores at 3 and 4 hours postoperatively. There were no notable statistical distinctions observed in terms of patients necessitating rescue opioid consumption. Patient satisfaction using the NRS at both the 2-week and 6-week postoperatively did not differ significantly between both groups. The administration of LIA could offer advantages during the initial stages of postoperative recovery, which could be particularly valuable in rapid recovery programs.

[Analgesic effect of a new "cocktail" of local infiltration analgesia after total hip arthroplasty-A prospective randomized controlled study]

Objective

To study the analgesic effect of a new "cocktail" of local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with Deprosone after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

In a prospective randomized controlled study, 100 patients with hip joint disease requiring unilateral primary THA in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2018 and December 2018 were enrolled and randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 50 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in age, gender, operative side, disease type, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, preoperative rest and activity visual analogue scale (VAS) score, hip Harris score (HHS), quality of life scale (SF-12) score, and other general data between the two groups ( P>0.05). The patients in the observation group were treated with a new "cocktail" LIA around the hip joint before suturing the incision, and the drug formula was ropivacaine 200 mg, Diprospan 1 mL, morphine 10 mg, and added normal saline to 80 mL; the patients in the control group were not treated with LIA. The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, the amount of morphine used during hospitalization, and the range of motion of hip joint at discharge were recorded, and the complications were counted. The VAS score at rest and activity, HHS score, and SF-12 score [physiological score (PCS) and psychological score (MCS)] of the hip joint were recorded before and after operation, and the postoperative analgesic effect and the recovery of hip joint function were evaluated.

Results

There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups ( P>0.05), and the postoperative hospital stay in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group ( P<0.05). The postoperative morphine consumption in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group ( P<0.05), and the total morphine consumption in the observation group was less than that in the control group during hospitalization, but the difference was not significant ( P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up to 6 months after operation. The resting VAS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group at 2, 6, 12 hours after operation and in the morning and afternoon of the first day after operation, and the active VAS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group at 6, 12 hours after operation and in the morning of the first day after operation, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the resting and active VAS scores between the two groups on the day of discharge and at 3 and 6 months after operation ( P>0.05). At discharge, the flexion range of motion of hip joint in the observation group was significantly greater than that in the control group ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the abduction range of motion of hip joint between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in HHS score and SF-12 score between the two groups at 3 and 6 months after operation ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in analgesic satisfaction and functional satisfaction between the two groups at last follow-up ( P>0.05). There was no complication such as skin pruritus, superficial and deep infection of incision, skin necrosis, deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity, and pulmonary embolism in both groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications such as nausea and vomiting, urine retention, fat liquefaction of incision, local hematoma, and large fluctuation of blood sugar between the two groups ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

The new "cocktail" LIA with Diprospan can effectively reduce the early postoperative pain of THA, reduce the dosage of opioids, shorten the length of hospital stay, and is conducive to the early functional rehabilitation of patients.

A new cocktail formula with diprospan of local infiltration analgesia in primary total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, controlled, observer-blinded study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to observe the analgesic effect of the cocktail formulation with diprospan during total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

From September 2018 to April 2019, 120 patients undergoing primary unilateral THA were included in this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study. Patients were randomized into three groups, according to the different local infiltration analgesia (LIA) strategies: LIA with ropivacaine (the ropivacaine group, n = 40), LIA with a new cocktail containing ropivacaine, diprospan, and morphine (the cocktail group, n = 40), and the control group (n = 40). The primary outcomes included postoperative pain scores. The resting visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were measured at 2, 6, and 12 h after the surgery (a.m. and p.m.) on postoperative day (POD) 1, POD2, and the day of discharge. Movement VAS scores were assessed at 6 h, 12 h after the operation (a.m. and p.m.) on POD1, POD2, and the day of discharge. The secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, postoperative hospital stay, range of motion of the hip at discharge, patient satisfaction, and the results of the follow-up.

RESULTS

After the screening, 120 patients were randomized into three groups (40 patients in each group). All of the patients completed the trial. The resting VAS scores in the ropivacaine group and cocktail group at 2 h were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively, F = 17.054), and the same trend was also postoperatively found at 6 h (p = 0.005 and P = 0.002, F = 6.212). Twelve hours after the operation, the pain score in the cocktail group was lower than that in the other two groups, but only the difference between the cocktail group and the control group was statistically significant (P = 0.018, F = 3.144). From the morning of the first postoperative day to the a.m. on POD 2, the VAS scores in the cocktail group were significantly lower than those in the ropivacaine group and the control group. Furthermore, the movement VAS scores in the ropivacaine group and the cocktail group were better than those in the control group at 6 and 12 h post-operation (P < 0.05). The per capita opioid consumption in the cocktail group was less than that in the ropivacaine group and the control group within 24 h post-operation. There were no significant differences in the comparison of additional indicators among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The new cocktail with diprospan had a better result and longer duration time for early postoperative pain control in primary THA via the posterolateral approach under general anesthesia, especially for treating resting pain.

Comparative analysis of analgesic effect of iliac fascial block with vertical and horizontal inguinal approach for total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To compare and analyze the analgesic effect of iliac fascial block with vertical and horizontal inguinal approach after total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

78 patients who admitted to our hospital and underwent unilateral total hip replacement from January 2019 to June 2020 were enrolled and randomly divided into Group A (n=40) and Group B (n=38). 30 min before surgery, the group A received ultrasound-guided iliac fascial block by vertical inguinal approach, and group B underwent ultrasound-guided iliac fascial block with horizontal inguinal approach. Both groups received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA) postoperatively. Subsequently, the postoperative VAS scores, the cumulative postoperative PCA dosage of Sufentanil, the occurrence of postoperative adverse reactions, and the overall satisfaction scores of patients with anesthesia 24 h after surgery were compared accordingly.

RESULTS

The VAS score of Group A at 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h after surgery was remarkably lower than that of Group-B (P<0.05). The cumulative Sufentanil dosage of PCA in Group A was substantially less than that in Group B (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups of patients was statistically insignificant (P>0.05). The satisfaction degree with anesthesia 24 h after surgery in Group A was notably higher than that in Group B (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the horizontal inguinal approach, patients received iliac fascial block by vertical inguinal approach can achieve better postoperative analgesic effect for hip replacement. It helps to reduce Sufentanil dosage and improve the patient's satisfaction with analgesia, and thus safe for clinical application.

The impact of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block combined with local infiltration analgesia for arthroplasty on postoperative pain relief

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (QLB) combined with local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for pain management and recovery in patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA) via a posterolateral approach.

DESIGN

This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

We collected data in the preoperative area, operating room, and bed ward.

PATIENTS

A total of 80 patients with American Society of Anesthesiology functional status scores of II-III were included and assigned to two groups, and all 80 patients were included in the final analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

All included patients were randomly assigned to the nerve block (group N) or the control group (group C). Patients in the group N received transmuscular QLB combined with LIA, while patients in the group C received only LIA.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was postoperative pain during the first active motion: it was measured at six hours after surgery and assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes were the resting VAS scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery; VAS scores during motion at 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery; intraoperative consumption of opioids; postoperative consumption of morphine hydrochloride; frequency of sleep interruption due to pain on the night of surgery; time until the first "walk out of the bed" after surgery; muscle strength of the quadriceps femoris; and postoperative adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

Compared to the group C, patients in the group N had significantly lower VAS scores during motion at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, as well as lower resting VAS scores in the PACU and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Patients in the group N also consumed significantly smaller amounts of intraoperative opioids and morphine after surgery. Patients in the group N reported significantly fewer interruptions in sleep due to pain on the night of surgery and were able to "walk out of the bed" significantly earlier than those in the group C. There was no significant difference between the two groups in muscle strength of the quadriceps femoris or incidence of postoperative adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to treatment with LIA alone, ultrasound-guided transmuscular QLB combined with LIA can provide better postoperative pain relief and enhance the recovery of THA patients, since it does not cause quadriceps femoris muscle weakness and is associated with significantly lower need for intraoperative opioids.

Fascia iliaca compartment block for analgesia in total hip replacement: A randomized controlled study protocol

BACKGROUND

Pain management after the total joint arthroplasty is still challenging, but worthy of attention, because good pain management can improve the outcomes of patient. It is still controversial whether fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) can effectively decrease the opioid consumption and pain after total hip replacement (THR) owing to the number of published investigations is small. The purpose of this present study is to assess the efficacy and safety of FICB for postoperative analgesia after THR.

METHODS

This is a single center, placebo-controlled randomized trial which is performed in accordance with the SPIRIT Checklist for randomized studies. It was authorized via the Chifeng Municipal Hospital institutional review committee (H2020-19-8). 100 patients undergoing THR will be included in this study. Patients are randomly divided into 2 groups: FICB group or Non-FICB group, FICB with 5mgmL of epinephrine and 40 mL of ropivacaine 0.2%. Primary outcomes are pain score at different time point. Visual analog scale is used to assess the pain (10: the maximum possible pain and 0: absent pain). The secondary outcomes are the postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and total consumption of opioid. All the needed analyses are implemented through utilizing SPSS for Windows Version 15.0.

RESULTS

Figure 1 will show the primary and secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This trial can provide an evidence for the use of FICB for analgesia after THR.

Efficacy and safety of local infiltration analgesia for pain management in total knee and hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) has become popular in postoperative pain relief after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of LIA with intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia after THA and TKA.

METHODS

A systematic article search was performed from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, up to February 21, 2019. The main outcomes included visual analog scale for assessment of pain, morphine equivalent consumption, length of hospital stay, and adverse events. The data were calculated using weight mean difference (WMD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

RESULTS

Eleven studies with a total of 707 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. LIA provided better pain control than other 2 techniques at 24-hour (WMD = 10.61, 95% CI: 3.36-17.87; P = .004), 48-hour (WMD = 16.0, 95% CI: 8.87-23.13; P < .001), and 72-hour (WMD = 11.31, 95% CI: 3.78-18.83; P < .001). Moreover, LIA had similar morphine consumption and duration of hospital stay with intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia. There was significantly lower incidence of adverse events with LIA than with the other 2 techniques.

CONCLUSION

LIA provided better postoperative pain control and less adverse events than intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia after THA and TKA.

Intrathecal versus local infiltration analgesia for pain control in total joint arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of intrathecal morphine (ITM) analgesia and local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for pain control in total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All RCTs were comparing intrathecal analgesia and local infiltration analgesia in TJA. Primary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) score with rest or mobilization up to 72 h. Secondary outcomes were the total morphine consumption, length of hospital stay, and morphine-related complications.

RESULTS

Compared with the intrathecal analgesia group, the LIA group was associated with a reduction in VAS score with rest up to 72 h. Moreover, LIA was associated with a decrease in VAS score with mobilization at 6 h, 12 h, 48 h, and 72 h. Moreover, LIA significantly reduced total morphine consumption (weighted mean difference (WMD)  = - 15.37, 95% CI - 22.64 to - 8.83, P  = 0.000), length of hospital stay (WMD  =  - 1.39, 95% CI - 1.67 to - 1.11, P  = 0.000), and morphine-related complications (nausea and pruritus).

CONCLUSIONS

Local infiltration provided superior analgesia and morphine-sparing effects within the first 72 h compared with ITM following TJA.

[Infiltration anesthesia]

OBJECTIVE

Complete anesthesia of any skin and soft tissue area by intradermal, subcutaneous, or intramuscular injections.

INDICATIONS

Small injuries or incisions in limbs or trunk, minor surgery on the face/jaw (e.g., on the teeth), or postoperative analgesia (local infiltration anesthesia, LIA).

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Local infections at the injection site.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

By means of intradermal, subcutaneous or intramuscular administration, a grandeur arises, here the local anesthetic blocks nerve transmission. If anesthetized distal to end arteries, vasoconstrictors (e.g., epinephrine) should be avoided. Proximal to end arteries, localized ischemia may facilitate operative care.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

The effect of local anesthesia is self-limiting.

RESULTS

By means of infiltration anesthesia or "field block", larger areas of skin are easily accessible for surgical treatment. The amount to be applied has to be adapted to the extent of the operation and the maximal dose. Postoperatively, after knee or hip arthroplasty, analgesia consumption can be reduced, and early mobilization promoted using LIA.