1
|
Jacob A, Heumann M, Zderic I, Varga P, Ion N, Bocea B, Haschtmann D, Fekete T, Wirtz CR, Richards RG, Gueorguiev B, Loibl M. Cyclic testing of standalone ALIF versus TLIF in lumbosacral spines of low bone mineral density: an ex vivo biomechanical study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024:10.1007/s00586-024-08391-7. [PMID: 39017731 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08391-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Screwed anterior lumbar interbody fusion (SALIF) alleviates the need for supplemental posterior fixation leading to reduction of perioperative morbidity. Specifically, elderly and multimorbid patients would benefit from shorter operative time and faster recovery but tend to have low bone mineral density (BMD). The current study aimed to compare loosening, defined as increase of ROM and NZ, of SALIF versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) under cyclic loading in cadaveric spines with reduced BMD. METHODS Twelve human spines (L4-S2; 6 male 6 female donors; age 70.6 ± 19.6; trabecular BMD of L5 84.2 ± 24.4 mgHA/cm3, range 51-119 mgHA/cm3) were assigned to two groups. SALIF or TLIF were instrumented at L5/S1. Range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) were assessed before and after axial cyclic loading (0-1150 N, 2000 cycles, 0.5 Hz) in flexion-extension (Flex-Ext), lateral bending, (LB), axial rotation (AR). RESULTS ROM of the SALIF specimens increased significantly in all loading directions (p ≤ 0.041), except for left AR (p = 0.053), whereas for TLIF it increased significantly in left LB (p = 0.033) and Flex (p = 0.015). NZ of SALIF showed increase in Flex-Ext and LB, whereas NZ of TLIF did not increase significantly in any motion direction. CONCLUSIONS Axial compression loading caused loosening of SALIF in Flex-Ext and LB, but not TLIF at L5/S1 in low BMD specimens. Nevertheless, Post-cyclic ROM and NZ of SALIF is comparable to TLIF. This suggests that, neither construct is optimal for the use in patients with reduced BMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Jacob
- Biomedical Department, AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
- Department of Spine Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | | | - Ivan Zderic
- Biomedical Department, AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Peter Varga
- Biomedical Department, AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Ion
- Faculty of Medicine Sibiu, Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, Romania
| | - Bogdan Bocea
- Faculty of Medicine Sibiu, Lucian Blaga University, Sibiu, Romania
| | | | - Tamas Fekete
- Department of Spine Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - R Geoff Richards
- Biomedical Department, AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Boyko Gueorguiev
- Biomedical Department, AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Markus Loibl
- Department of Spine Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aguirre AO, Soliman MAR, Kuo CC, Kassay A, Parmar G, Kruk MD, Quiceno E, Khan A, Lim J, Hess RM, Mullin JP, Pollina J. Defining cage subsidence in anterior, oblique, and lateral lumbar spine fusion approaches: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 2024; 47:332. [PMID: 39009745 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02551-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
One of the most common complications of lumbar fusions is cage subsidence, which leads to collapse of disc height and reappearance of the presenting symptomology. However, definitions of cage subsidence are inconsistent, leading to a variety of subsidence calculation methodologies and thresholds. To review previously published literature on cage subsidence in order to present the most common methods for calculating and defining subsidence in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) approaches. A search was completed in PubMed and Embase with inclusion criteria focused on identifying any study that provided descriptions of the method, imaging modality, or subsidence threshold used to calculate the presence of cage subsidence. A total of 69 articles were included in the final analysis, of which 18 (26.1%) reported on the ALIF approach, 22 (31.9%) on the OLIF approach, and 31 (44.9%) on the LLIF approach, 2 of which reported on more than one approach. ALIF articles most commonly calculated the loss of disc height over time with a subsidence threshold of > 2 mm. Most OLIF articles calculated the total amount of cage migration into the vertebral bodies, with a threshold of > 2 mm. LLIF was the only approach in which most articles applied the same method for calculation, namely, a grading scale for classifying the loss of disc height over time. We recommend future articles adhere to the most common methodologies presented here to ensure accuracy and generalizability in reporting cage subsidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander O Aguirre
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 100 High Street, Suite B4, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Mohamed A R Soliman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 100 High Street, Suite B4, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Cathleen C Kuo
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Kassay
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gaganjot Parmar
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Marissa D Kruk
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Esteban Quiceno
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 100 High Street, Suite B4, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Asham Khan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 100 High Street, Suite B4, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jaims Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 100 High Street, Suite B4, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Ryan M Hess
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 100 High Street, Suite B4, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey P Mullin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 100 High Street, Suite B4, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - John Pollina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 100 High Street, Suite B4, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen R, Zou K, Liu J, Li K, Zhou Y, Huang H, Yang F. Do modic changes affect the fusion rate in spinal interbody fusion surgery? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2024; 125:110-119. [PMID: 38772174 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the fusion rates of spinal interbody fusion in patients with modic changes (MCs). METHODS This meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO, and the project number was CRD42024538023. This network meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to March 28, 2024 for potential studies. STATA 13.0 and Review Manager 5.3 were used to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS Seven studies with a total of 1162 patients or segments assigned to four groups according to MCs grade were identified. The fusion rate in the non-modic changes (NMCs) was significantly greater than that in the MCs at the 3-month (p = 0.0001) and 6-month (p = 0.002) follow-ups. No significant difference was detected in the fusion rate at 12-month (p = 0.34) and final follow-ups (p = 0.41). No significant difference was found in cervical fusion (p = 0.88) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) (p = 0.51). The fusion rate of NMCs was significantly greater than that of MCs in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (p < 0.00001). No significant differences were identified among the four groups in the overall comparison, cervical fusion or TLIF subgroups. The fusion rate in the NMCs was significantly greater than that in the MCs-2 and MCs-3 in the PLIF. CONCLUSION MCs decreased the fusion rate at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. MCs-2 and MCs-3 decrease the fusion rate in PLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rigao Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Kai Zou
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jianjia Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ke Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yi Zhou
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Haoyun Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fei Yang
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xiao Y, Zhu C, Xiu P, Wang L, Zhang Z, Deng Z, Song Y, Yang X. Postoperative Sclerotic Modic Changes After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact on Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:E135-E141. [PMID: 38031447 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess postoperative sclerotic modic changes (MCs) following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease, investigating their prevalence, risk factors, and association with clinical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Sclerotic MCs may occur in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease after lumbar interbody fusion. The incidence and characteristics of postoperative sclerotic MCs, as well as their clinical impact, are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 467 patients (510 levels) who underwent single or two-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery, divided into a postoperative sclerotic MC group (60 patients, 66 levels) and a non-MC group (407 patients, 444 levels). The time of development and location of postoperative sclerotic MCs, fusion rate, cage subsidence, bilateral process decompression, and cross-link usage were recorded. Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index scores were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with the development of postoperative sclerotic MCs. RESULTS The prevalence of postoperative sclerotic MCs was 12.8%. The postoperative sclerotic MC group had a higher body mass index (BMI). The postoperative sclerotic MC group demonstrated a fusion rate of 47%, significantly lower than that of the non-MC group (71%) at six months post-operation. At final follow-up, the fusion rate in the postoperative sclerotic MC group was 62%, significantly lower than that of the non-MC group (86%). Postoperative visual analogue scale and Oswestry disability index scores were significantly higher in the group with postoperative sclerotic MCs. BMI and osteoporosis were significantly associated with the development of postoperative sclerotic MCs. CONCLUSION Postoperative sclerotic MCs generally appear within the first year after surgery, with a prevalence of 12.8%. The presence of postoperative sclerotic MCs can adversely impact postoperative outcomes. To prevent postoperative sclerotic MCs, the authors postulate extending the immobilization period with external bracing and improving the management of BMI and osteoporosis in the perioperative time window.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Xiao
- Department of Orthopaedic, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Donaldson C, Santro T, Awad M, Morokoff A. 3D-printed titanium alloy cage in anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY (HONG KONG) 2024; 10:22-29. [PMID: 38567003 PMCID: PMC10982926 DOI: 10.21037/jss-23-120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Background The most commonly used cages for intervertebral disc replacement in lumbar fusion procedures are made predominantly from polyetheretherketone (PEEK). There is sufficient data studying their subsidence and failure rates from a variety of approaches. A novel implant is now available for commercial use, 3D-printed porous titanium (3DppTi) alloy cages, which have recently become available for use in spinal procedures. They have been shown in ovine models to have superior efficacy and fusion rates compared to traditional cages. However, there is limited data on their use in clinical practice and long-term outcomes associated with them. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed, of all patients in a single institution who underwent lumbar spine fusion surgery via an anterior or lateral approach with a 3D-printed titanium alloy cage, between January 2020 and February 2021. Clinic letters, imaging and operation reports were independently reviewed to assess for fusion, or evidence of subsidence on follow-up. Results Fifty patients were identified as meeting inclusion criteria, with a total of 66 operative levels. Of these operative levels, 32 were via an anterior approach and 34 via a lateral approach. One patient demonstrated a Marchi grade 0 subsidence, with recurrence of radiculopathy 2 months after an anterior approach, requiring posterior decompression and stabilization. A second patient demonstrated a Marchi grade 1 subsidence after a lateral approach, but did not require further surgery as they were asymptomatic at 2 years of follow-up. This study demonstrated an overall subsidence rate of 3.03%. There was a median follow-up time of 11.3 months for all patients. Conclusions 3D-printed titanium alloy cages demonstrate a lower subsidence rate compared to historically published rates for alternative intervertebral cages, in anterior and lateral lumbar spine fusion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Donaldson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tomislav Santro
- Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mohammed Awad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Morokoff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu J, Miao J, Chen G, Xu H, Wen W, Xu H, Liu L. Finite element biomechanical analysis of 3D printed intervertebral fusion cage in osteoporotic population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:129. [PMID: 38347518 PMCID: PMC10860281 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07221-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the biomechanical characteristics of each tissue structure when using different 3D printing Cage in osteoporotic patients undergoing interbody fusion. METHODS A finite element model of the lumbar spine was reconstructed and validated with regarding a range of motion and intervertebral disc pressure from previous in vitro studies. Cage and pedicle screws were implanted and part of the lamina, spinous process, and facet joints were removed in the L4/5 segment of the validated mode to simulate interbody fusion. A 280 N follower load and 7.5 N·m moment were applied to different postoperative models and intact osteoporotic model to simulate lumbar motion. The biomechanical characteristics of different models were evaluated by calculating and analyzing the range of motion of the fixed and cephalic adjacent segment, the stress of the screw-rod system, the stress at the interface between cage and L5 endplate, and intervertebral disc pressure of the adjacent segment. RESULTS After rigid fixation, the range of motion of the fixed segment of model A-C decreased significantly, which was much smaller than that of the osteoporotic model. And with the increase of the axial area of the interbody fusion cages, the fixed segment of model A-C tended to be more stable. The range of motion and intradiscal pressure of the spinal models with different interbody fusion cages were higher than those of the complete osteoporosis model, but there was no significant difference between the postoperative models. On the other hand, the L5 upper endplate stress and screw-rod system stress of model A-C show a decreasing trend in different directions of motion. The stress of the endplate is the highest during flexion, which can reach 40.5 MPa (model A). The difference in endplate stress between models A-C was the largest during lateral bending. The endplate stress of models A and B was 150.5% and 140.9% of that of model C, respectively. The stress of the screw-rod system was the highest during lateral bending (model A, 102.0 MPa), which was 108.4%, 102.4%, 110.4%, 114.2% of model B and 158.5%, 110.1%, 115.8%, 125.4% of model C in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS For people with osteoporosis, no matter what type of cage is used, good immediate stability can be achieved after surgery. Larger cage sizes provide better fixation without significantly increasing ROM and IDP in adjacent segments, which may contribute to the development of ASD. In addition, larger cage sizes can disperse endplate stress and reduce stress concentration, which is of positive significance in preventing cage subsidence after operation. The cage and screw rod system establish a stress conduction pathway on the spine, and a larger cage greatly enhances the stress-bearing capacity of the front column, which can better distribute the stress of the posterior spine structure and the stress borne by the posterior screw rod system, reduce the stress concentration phenomenon of the nail rod system, and avoid exceeding the yield strength of the material, resulting in the risk of future instrument failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jincheng Wu
- Department of Emergency Trauma Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou City, Hainan, China, 48 Baishuitang Road, Longhua District, 571700
| | - Jun Miao
- Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | | | - Hanpeng Xu
- Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Wangqiang Wen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou City, Hainan, China
| | - Haoxiang Xu
- The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Lizhu Liu
- Department of Emergency Trauma Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou City, Hainan, China, 48 Baishuitang Road, Longhua District, 571700.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zavras AG, Federico V, Nolte MT, Butler AJ, Dandu N, Munim M, Harper DE, Lopez GD, DeWald CJ, An HS, Singh K, Phillips FM, Colman MW. Risk Factors for Subsidence Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Global Spine J 2024; 14:257-264. [PMID: 35593712 PMCID: PMC10676155 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221103588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) may be complicated by subsidence, which can lead to significant morbidity including pain, disc space collapse, neural compression, segmental kyphosis, instability, and vertebral body fracture. This study sought to identify patient and procedural risk factors for subsidence in patients undergoing ALIF. METHODS This study analyzed consecutive patients who underwent ALIF at a single institution with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patients were grouped as either Non-Subsidence (NS-ALIF) or Cage Subsidence (CS-ALIF) based on the final postoperative radiograph. Demographic variables, operative characteristics, and radiographic outcomes were evaluated to identify significant predictors on univariate and multivariate statistics. RESULTS 144 patients (170 levels) were included with an average follow-up of 50.70 ± 28.44 months (4.23 years). The incidence of subsidence was 22.94% (39/170 levels). On univariate statistics, the CS-ALIF group was significantly older (P = .020), had higher BMI (P = .048), worse ASA (P = .001), higher prevalence of comorbid osteoporosis (P < .001), and a more anteriorly placed interbody device (P = .005). On multivariate analysis, anterior cage placement remained the only significant predictor (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14; P = .003). There was a significantly higher rate of subsequent adjacent segment surgery among the CS-ALIF group (P = .035). CONCLUSION Factors contributing to subsidence in ALIF included older age, higher BMI, severe ASA, and osteoporosis, while anterior cage placement remained the only independent predictor on multivariate analysis. Subsidence was associated with a higher rate of subsequent adjacent segment surgery. Surgical technique should optimize placement of the interbody cage and avoid overstuffing the disc space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athan G. Zavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Vincent Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T. Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alexander J. Butler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Navya Dandu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mohammed Munim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniel E. Harper
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gregory D. Lopez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Howard S. An
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Frank M. Phillips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew W. Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chayanun S, Chanamuangkon T, Boonsuth B, Boccaccini AR, Lohwongwatana B. Enhancing PEEK surface bioactivity: Investigating the effects of combining sulfonation with sub-millimeter laser machining. Mater Today Bio 2023; 22:100754. [PMID: 37593219 PMCID: PMC10430171 DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to its superior mechanical properties and chemical stability, Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has emerged as an alternative to conventional metal implants. However, the bio-inertness of PEEK's surface has limited its applications. Ambient sulfonation has been adopted to enhance bioactivity, but its nanoscale topographic changes are insufficient for implant-bone interlock. To further improve bone-implant interlock, this study employs CO2 laser machining to create sub-millimeter (0.5 mm) grooves on PEEK's surface, aiming to encourage bone ingrowth and strengthen the implant-bone interface. This research investigated the physical and chemical properties and bio-interaction of PEEK surface modified by sulfonation (SPEEK), laser machining (L-PEEK), and combination of both technique (L-SPEEK). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra revealed that sulfonation compensates for the surface chemical shift instigated by laser ablation, aligning the surface chemistry of L-SPEEK with that of SPEEK. Furthermore, L-PEEK surfaces presented pores with sizes ranging from 1 to 600 μm, while SPEEK surfaces exhibited pores between 5 and 700 nm. All tested samples demonstrated non-cytotoxicity, with L-SPEEK exhibiting the highest mineralization and ALP activity as 2 and 2.1 times that of intrinsic PEEK, after 21 days of incubation. Microscopic imaging reveals a notably higher extracellular content on L-SPEEK compared to the other groups. This study underscores the potential of combining sub-millimeter laser machining with sulfonation in enhancing early osteogenic markers, providing a promising pathway for future PEEK-based orthopedic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slila Chayanun
- Biomedical Engineering Program, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
- Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Institute of Biomaterials, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Cauerstr. 6, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Theerapat Chanamuangkon
- Biomaterial Testing Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Budsaraporn Boonsuth
- Oral Biology Research Center, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Aldo R. Boccaccini
- Institute of Biomaterials, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Cauerstr. 6, 91058, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Boonrat Lohwongwatana
- Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xiao Y, Xiu P, Yang X, Wang L, Li T, Gong Q, Liu L, Song Y. Does Preoperative Modic Changes Influence the Short-term Fusion Rate of Single Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?-a Matched-pair Case Control Study. Orthop Surg 2023; 15:2309-2317. [PMID: 37439298 PMCID: PMC10475667 DOI: 10.1111/os.13795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE At present, the influence of Modic changes (MCs) on postoperative fusion rate of lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is mainly focused on the medium- and long-term fusion rate, while the short-term fusion rate has not been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term fusion rate of lumbar degenerative disease patients with and without MCs after single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS In this retrospective and matched-pair case control study, we included 100 patients who underwent TLIF from January 2017 to January 2020 and had at least two follow-up visits over a two-year period. Fifty patients with MCs (MCs group) were matched with 50 patients without MCs (non MCs group) for age, sex, surgical level, diagnosis, operative time, and intraoperative blood loss. We collected the X-ray and computed tomography (CT) data of patients from 3 months to 2 years after the operation to assess bony fusion and the cage union ratio. According to the type of cage, the MCs group was further divided into the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) group and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) group, and the fusion performance between the two groups was compared. Finally, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking and cage type were included in the logistic regression model for risk factor analysis. RESULTS The bony fusion rates in the MCs group at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after surgery were significantly lower than those in the non MCs group (P < 0.05) (23.8% vs 62.5%, 52.6% vs 78.9%, 61.1% vs 83.3%, 74.0% vs 90.0%). The average coronal cage union ratios of the upper and lower endplates in the MCs group were significantly lower than those in the non MCs group (54.3% ± 17.5% vs 75.0% ± 17.2%, P < 0.05; 73.3% ± 12.0% vs 84.9% ± 8.0%, P < 0.05). Similarly, analogous results were obtained by comparing the MCs and non MCs groups' three-dimensional CT sagittal plane images (62.5% ± 16.5% vs 76.1% ± 12.4%, P < 0.05; 67.0% ± 13.9% vs 79.8% ± 11.5%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Short-term fusion rates were lower in the MCs group than in the non MCs group. The coronal and sagittal cage union ratio in the MCs group was lower than that in the non MCs group. The fusion performance of n-HA/PA66 and PEEK cages in the MCs group was comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Xiao
- Department of Orthopaedic, Orthopaedic Research InstituteWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Peng Xiu
- Department of Orthopaedic, Orthopaedic Research InstituteWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Xi Yang
- Department of Orthopaedic, Orthopaedic Research InstituteWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic, Orthopaedic Research InstituteWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Tao Li
- Department of Orthopaedic, Orthopaedic Research InstituteWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Quan Gong
- Department of Orthopaedic, Orthopaedic Research InstituteWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Limin Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic, Orthopaedic Research InstituteWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Yueming Song
- Department of Orthopaedic, Orthopaedic Research InstituteWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
An alternative method to evaluate lumbar interbody fusion status focusing on position change of screw-rod constructs. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:1545-1552. [PMID: 36305899 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09194-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion status is generally subjective and may differ among raters. The authors examined whether the assessment of position change of screw-rod constructs could be an alternative method for the evaluation of fusion status. METHODS Sixty-three patients undergoing lumbar interbody single-level fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Three-dimensional images of screw-rod constructs were created from baseline CT examination on the day after surgery and follow-up CT examinations (3-5 months, 6-11 months, and ≥ 12 months) and superposed, with position change of screw-rod constructs being evaluated by the distance between the 3-dimensional images at baseline and follow-up. The evaluation was repeated twice to confirm the reproducibility. Fusion status on follow-up CT examinations was assessed by three raters, where inter-rater reliability was evaluated with Fleiss' kappa. The results of the fusion status were classified into fusion and incomplete fusion groups in each timing of follow-up CT examinations, where the amount of position change was compared between the two groups. RESULTS The evaluation of position change was completely reproducible. The Fleiss' kappa (agreements) was 0.481 (69.4%). The medians of the amount of position change in fusion and incomplete fusion groups were 0.134 mm and 0.158 mm at 3-5 months (p = 0.21), 0.160 mm and 0.190 mm at 6-11 months (p = 0.02), and 0.156 mm and 0.314 mm at ≥ 12 months (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS The assessment of position change of screw-rod constructs at 6 months or more after surgery can be an alternative method for evaluating lumbar interbody fusion status. KEY POINTS • Lumbar interbody fusion status (satisfactory, incomplete, or failed) is associated with the quantification of position change of screw-rod in this study. • Reference values for the evaluation of position change in identifying interbody fusion status are provided. • Position change of screw-rod could be a supportive method for evaluating interbody fusion status.
Collapse
|
11
|
Guyer RD, Zigler JE, Blumenthal SL, Shellock JL, Ohnmeiss DD. Evaluation of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Performed Using a Stand-Alone, Integrated Fusion Cage. Int J Spine Surg 2023; 17:1-5. [PMID: 35940637 PMCID: PMC10025836 DOI: 10.14444/8354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has been performed for many years. Often, posterior supplemental fixation has been used to provide additional stability to the operated segment. Interbody implants have evolved to incorporate unique designs, polyetheretherketone, integrated screws, and surface texture. With these changes, the need for supplemental posterior fixation has been debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of stand-alone ALIF. METHODS A surgery log was reviewed to identify the consecutive series of 58 patients undergoing ALIF using a STALIF stand-alone cage from March 2011 (first case) to December 2018 (minimum 24 months postoperative) with a mean follow-up of 30.6 months. All patients were treated for symptomatic degenerative conditions. Charts were reviewed to collect general patient information, operative data, and patient-reported outcomes, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scales (VAS) separately assessing back pain and leg pain, and re-operations. For patients who were not seen recently in clinic for follow-up, current outcome data were collected through mailings. RESULTS The mean operative blood loss was 52.1 mL. There was a statistically significant improvement in mean ODI scores from 41.7 preoperatively to 21.0 at follow-up (P < 0.01). There was also significant improvement (P < 0.01) in VAS back pain (6.0-2.5) and leg pain (4.1-1.3). Subsequent surgery was performed on 9 patients. Reasons for re-operation were pseudoarthrosis (n = 3), progressive cage subsidence (n = 1), foraminal stenosis at the index level (n = 1), metal allergy reaction (n = 2), adjacent segment degeneration (n = 1), and ongoing pain (n = 1). There were no cases of device failure, vertebral body fracture, or screws backing out of the implant. DISCUSSION Stand-alone ALIF was associated with statistically significant improvements in ODI scores, back pain, and leg pain. The re-operation rate for clear pseudoarthrosis or cage subsidence was 6.8%. These results support that stand-alone ALIF produces good outcomes in patients treated for symptomatic disc degeneration while avoiding the use of posterior fixation and its complication risk and cost. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The results of this study support that stand-alone ALIF is a viable procedure for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration unresponsive in patients who have failed nonoperative care and who do not have specific indications for supplemental posterior instrumentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D Guyer
- Center for Disc Replacement at Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA
| | - Jack E Zigler
- Center for Disc Replacement at Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Donna D Ohnmeiss
- Center for Disc Replacement at Texas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA
- Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yao YC, Chao H, Kao KY, Lin HH, Wang ST, Chang MC, Liu CL, Chou PH. CT Hounsfield unit is a reliable parameter for screws loosening or cages subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Sci Rep 2023; 13:1620. [PMID: 36709341 PMCID: PMC9884280 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28555-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Retrospective cohort study. To validate computed tomography (CT) radiodensity in Hounsfield units (HU) as a prognostic marker for pedicle screw loosening or cage subsidence in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). The retrospective study involved 198 patients treated with MI-TLIF. Screw loosening (SL), cage subsidence (CS), and fusion status were assessed by plain radiographs. The risk factors of SL and CS were identified using logistic regression. A total of 258 levels and 930 screws were analyzed. During a 2-year follow-up, 16.2% and 24.7% of patients had CS and SL respectively. The cut-off value of L1 HU for predicting SL or CS was 117. The L1 HU < 117 and BMI ≥ 25 were two independent risk factors. The risk of SL or CS was 4.1 fold in patients L1 HU < 117 and 2.6 fold in patients with BMI ≥ 25. For patients concurrently having BMI ≥ 25 and pre-op L1 HU < 117, the risk was 4.3 fold. Fusion rate and clinical outcome were comparable in patients with SL or CS. L1 HU < 117 and BMI > 25 were two independent risk factors that can be screened preoperatively for preventing SL or CS and lead to better management of patients undergoing MI-TLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Cheng Yao
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsien Chao
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Yu Kao
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Education, Chi Mei Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Hsi-Hsien Lin
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Tien Wang
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Kinmen Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Kinmen, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Chau Chang
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Lin Liu
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hsin Chou
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. .,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hu YH, Yeh YC, Niu CC, Hsieh MK, Tsai TT, Chen WJ, Lai PL. Novel MRI-based vertebral bone quality score as a predictor of cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:654-662. [PMID: 35561693 DOI: 10.3171/2022.3.spine211489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Decreased bone mineral density as measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) has been reported to be associated with cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). However, DEXA is not often available or routinely performed before surgery. A novel MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score has been developed and reported to be correlated with DEXA T-scores. The authors investigated the ability of the VBQ score to predict cage subsidence and other risk factors associated with this complication. METHODS In this retrospective study, the authors reviewed the records of patients who had undergone single-level TLIF from March 2014 to October 2015 and had a follow-up of more than 2 years. Cage subsidence was measured as postoperative disc height loss and was graded according to the system proposed by Marchi et al. The MRI-based VBQ score was measured on T1-weighted images. Univariable analysis and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis were performed. Ad hoc analysis with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the predictive ability of the significant continuous variables. Additional analyses were used to determine the correlations between the VBQ score and T-scores and between the significant continuous variables and the amount of cage subsidence. RESULTS Among 242 patients eligible for study inclusion, 111 (45.87%) had cage subsidence after the index operation. Multivariable logistic regression analyses demonstrated that an increased VBQ score (OR 14.615 ± 0.377, p < 0.001), decreased depth ratio (OR 0.011 ± 1.796, p = 0.013), and the use of kidney-shaped cages instead of bullet-shaped cages (OR 2.766 ± 0.358, p = 0.008) were associated with increased cage subsidence. The VBQ score was shown to significantly predict cage subsidence with an accuracy of 85.6%. The VBQ score was found to be moderately correlated with DEXA T-scores of the total hip (r = -0.540, p < 0.001) and the lumbar spine (r = -0.546, p < 0.001). The amount of cage subsidence was moderately correlated with the VBQ score (r = 0.512, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Increased VBQ scores, posteriorly placed cages, and kidney-shaped cages were risk factors for cage subsidence. The VBQ score was shown to be a good predictor of cage subsidence, was moderately correlated with DEXA T-scores for the total hip and lumbar spine, and also had a moderate correlation with the amount of cage subsidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yung-Hsueh Hu
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 2Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 3College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan; and
| | - Yu-Cheng Yeh
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 2Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 3College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan; and
| | - Chi-Chien Niu
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 2Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 3College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan; and
| | - Ming-Kai Hsieh
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 2Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 3College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan; and
| | - Tsung-Ting Tsai
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 2Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 3College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan; and
| | - Wen-Jer Chen
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chung Shan Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Liang Lai
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 2Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou
- 3College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan; and
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Parisien A, Wai EK, ElSayed MS, Frei H. Subsidence of Spinal Fusion Cages: A Systematic Review. Int J Spine Surg 2022; 16:1103-1118. [PMID: 36289005 PMCID: PMC9807049 DOI: 10.14444/8363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many research studies investigating subsidence of intervertebral fusion cages have been published, to our knowledge, no study has comprehensively compared cage subsidence among all lumbar intervertebral fusion (LIF) techniques. This study aimed to review the literature reporting evidence of cage subsidence linked to LIF. The amount of subsidence was compared and associated with the procedures and corresponding implants used, and the effect of cage subsidence on clinical outcomes was investigated. METHODS For this systematic review, the MEDLINE and PubMed databases were used to identify relevant studies. Search terms included lumbar, lumbar vertebrae, lumbar spine, cage, spinal fusion, prosthesis, prosthesis implantation, implantation, implants, interbody, spacer, and subsidence. Studies included in this review were those having more than 10 patients and reporting the amount of subsidence observed using computed tomography or x-ray imaging after surgery and at follow-up visits after a minimum of 6 weeks postsurgery. Data and scale definitions related to subsidence were extracted from articles for comparison of subsidence prevalence between the 5 LIF surgical procedures. RESULTS Forty articles were identified for inclusion. The review included data from 390 anterior lumbar intervertebral fusions (ALIFs), 2130 lateral lumbar intervertebral fusions (LLIFs), 560 posterior lumbar intervertebral fusions (PLIFs), 245 oblique lumbar intervertebral fusions (OLIFs), and 1634 transverse lumbar intervertebral fusions (TLIFs) for a total of 4959 patients who underwent LIF surgery. The minimum and maximum percentages of the number of patients having subsidence for each procedure in the included studies were as follows: ALIF stand-alone, 6% and 23.1%; LLIF stand-alone, 8.7% and 39.6%; LLIF with posterior fixation, 3.3% and 20.7%; OLIF with posterior fixation, 4.4% and 36.9%; PLIF with posterior fixation, 7.4% and 31.8%; and TLIF, 0.0% and 51.2%. CONCLUSIONS The number of patients experiencing subsidence varied between studies within each fusion procedure. Our findings indicate that all 5 surgical methods are at risk of subsidence. Overall, ALIF without posterior fixation resulted in the lowest reported subsidence occurrence among the 5 surgical approaches. There is conflicting evidence on the association between subsidence and negative clinical outcomes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This review defines and compares subsidence incidence between all LIF procedures and investigates the risk of symptomatic clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane Parisien
- Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eugene K. Wai
- Orthopeadic Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mostafa S.A. ElSayed
- Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hanspeter Frei
- Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Hanspeter Frei, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 3135 Mackenzie Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Szadkowski M, Bahroun S, Aleksic I, Vande Kerckhove M, Ramos-Pascual S, Saffarini M, Fière V, d'Astorg H. Bioactive glass grants equivalent fusion compared to autologous iliac crest bone for ALIF: a within-patient comparative study. J Exp Orthop 2022; 9:56. [PMID: 35713816 PMCID: PMC9206065 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-022-00496-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine within-patient fusion rates of chambers filled with bioactive glass versus autologous iliac crest bone on computed tomography (CT) following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Methods A consecutive series of 40 patients (58 levels) that underwent single-level (L5-S1 only) or two-level (L5-S1 and L4-L5) ALIF were assessed. Indications for fusion were one or more of the following: degenerative disc disease with or without Modic changes, spondylolisthesis, and stenosis. Each intervertebral cage had a middle beam delimiting two chambers, one of which was filled with bioactive glass and the other with autologous iliac crest bone. CT scans were graded using the Bridwell classification (grade I, best; grade IV, worst). Patients were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and by rating pain in the lower back and legs on a Visual Analog Scale (pVAS); complications and reoperations were noted. Results At 15 ± 5 months follow-up, there were no significant differences in fusion across chambers filled with bioactive glass versus chambers filled with autologous bone (p = 0.416). Two patients with Bridwell grade III at both chambers of the L4-L5 cages required reoperation using posterior instrumentation. Clinical assessment of the 38 remaining patients (54 levels) at 25 ± 2 months, revealed ODI of 15 ± 12, lower back pVAS of 1.4 ± 1.5 and legs pVAS of 1.9 ± 1.6. Conclusions For ALIF at L5-S1 or L4-L5, within-patient fusion rates were equivalent for bioactive glass compared to autologous iliac crest bone; thus, bioactive glass can substitute autologous bone, avoiding increased operative time and blood loss, as well as donor site morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sami Bahroun
- Ramsay Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - Ivan Aleksic
- Ramsay Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Mo Saffarini
- ReSurg SA, Rue Saint-Jean 22, 1260, Nyon, Switzerland
| | - Vincent Fière
- Ramsay Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fogel G, Martin N, Lynch K, Pelletier MH, Wills D, Wang T, Walsh WR, Williams GM, Malik J, Peng Y, Jekir M. Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis. Spine J 2022; 22:1028-1037. [PMID: 35017054 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Cage subsidence remains a serious complication after spinal fusion surgery. Novel porous designs in the cage body or endplate offer attractive options to improve subsidence and osseointegration performance. PURPOSE To elucidate the relative contribution of a porous design in each of the two major domains (body and endplates) to cage stiffness and subsidence performance, using standardized mechanical testing methods, and to analyze the fusion progression via an established ovine interbody fusion model to support the mechanical testing findings. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING A comparative preclinical study using standardized mechanical testing and established animal model. METHODS To isolate the subsidence performance contributed by each porous cage design feature, namely the stress-optimized body lattice (vs. a solid body) and microporous endplates (vs. smooth endplates), four groups of cages (two-by-two combination of these two features) were tested in: (1) static axial compression of the cage (per ASTM F2077) and (2) static subsidence (per ASTM F2267). To evaluate the progression of fusion, titanium cages were created with a microporous endplate and internal lattice architecture analogous to commercial implants used in subsidence testing and implanted in an endplate-sparing, ovine intervertebral body fusion model. RESULTS The cage stiffness was reduced by 16.7% by the porous body lattice, and by 16.6% by the microporous endplates. The porous titanium cage with both porous features showed the lowest stiffness with a value of 40.4±0.3 kN/mm (Mean±SEM) and a block stiffness of 1976.8±27.4 N/mm for subsidence. The body lattice showed no significant impact on the block stiffness (1.4% reduction), while the microporous endplates decreased the block stiffness significantly by 24.9% (p<.0001). All segments implanted with porous titanium cages were deemed rigidly fused by manual palpation, except one at 12 weeks, consistent with robotic ROM testing and radiographic and histologic observations. A reduction in ROM was noted from 12 to 26 weeks (4.1±1.6° to 2.2±1.4° in lateral bending, p<.05; 2.1±0.6° to 1.5±0.3° in axial rotation, p<.05); and 3.3±1.6° to 1.9±1.2° in flexion extension, p=.07). Bone in the available void improved with time in the central aperture (54±35% to 83±13%, p<.05) and porous cage structure (19±26% to 37±21%, p=.15). CONCLUSIONS Body lattice and microporous endplates features can effectively reduce the cage stiffness, therefore reducing the risk of stress shielding and promoting early fusion. While body lattice showed no impact on block stiffness and the microporous endplates reduced the block stiffness, a titanium cage with microporous endplates and internal lattice supported bone ingrowth and segmental mechanical stability as early as 12 weeks in ovine interbody fusion. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Porous titanium cage architecture can offer an attractive solution to increase the available space for bone ingrowth and bridging to support successful spinal fusion while mitigating risks of increased subsidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy Fogel
- Spine Pain Begone Clinic, 2833 Babcock Rd Suite 306, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | | | - Kelli Lynch
- NuVasive, 7475 Lusk Blvd., San Diego, CA 92129, USA
| | - Matthew H Pelletier
- Surgical and Orthopedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Level 1, Clinical Sciences Building, Gate 6, Avoca St, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Daniel Wills
- Surgical and Orthopedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Level 1, Clinical Sciences Building, Gate 6, Avoca St, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Tian Wang
- Surgical and Orthopedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Level 1, Clinical Sciences Building, Gate 6, Avoca St, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - William R Walsh
- Surgical and Orthopedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Level 1, Clinical Sciences Building, Gate 6, Avoca St, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
| | | | - Jeremy Malik
- NuVasive, 7475 Lusk Blvd., San Diego, CA 92129, USA
| | - Yun Peng
- NuVasive, 7475 Lusk Blvd., San Diego, CA 92129, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu MH, Lee MH, Wu C, Tsai PI, Hsu WB, Huang SI, Lin TH, Yang KY, Chen CY, Chen SH, Lee CY, Huang TJ, Tsau FH, Li YY. In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Bone Growth Characteristics in Additive-Manufactured Porous Titanium, Nonporous Titanium, and Porous Tantalum Interbody Cages. MATERIALS 2022; 15:ma15103670. [PMID: 35629694 PMCID: PMC9147460 DOI: 10.3390/ma15103670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Autogenous bone grafts are the gold standard for interbody fusion implant materials; however, they have several disadvantages. Tantalum (Ta) and titanium (Ti) are ideal materials for interbody cages because of their biocompatibility, particularly when they are incorporated into a three-dimensional (3D) porous structure. We conducted an in vitro investigation of the cell attachment and osteogenic markers of self-fabricated uniform porous Ti (20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%), nonporous Ti, and porous Ta cages (n = 6) in each group. Cell attachment, osteogenic markers, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were measured. An in vivo study was performed using a pig-posterior-instrumented anterior interbody fusion model to compare the porous Ti (60%), nonporous Ti, and porous Ta interbody cages in 12 pigs. Implant migration and subsidence, determined using plain radiographs, were recorded before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Harvested implants were assessed for bone ingrowth and attachment. Relative to the 20% and 40% porous Ti cages, the 60% and 80% cages achieved superior cellular migration into cage pores. Among the cages, osteogenic marker and ALP activity levels were the highest in the 60% porous Ti cage, osteocalcin expression was the highest in the nonporous Ti cage, and the 60% porous Ti cage exhibited the lowest subsidence. In conclusion, the designed porous Ti cage is biocompatible and suitable for lumbar interbody fusion surgery and exhibits faster fusion with less subsidence compared with porous Ta and nonporous Ti cages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng-Huang Wu
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan; (M.-H.W.); (C.-Y.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (T.-J.H.)
- Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- TMU Biodesign Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hsueh Lee
- Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613016, Taiwan;
- Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi 613016, Taiwan
| | - Christopher Wu
- College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan;
| | - Pei-I Tsai
- Biomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chutung, Hsinchu County 310401, Taiwan; (P.-I.T.); (S.-I.H.); (K.-Y.Y.)
| | - Wei-Bin Hsu
- Sports Medicine Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613016, Taiwan;
| | - Shin-I Huang
- Biomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chutung, Hsinchu County 310401, Taiwan; (P.-I.T.); (S.-I.H.); (K.-Y.Y.)
| | - Tzu-Hung Lin
- Material and Chemical Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chutung, Hsinchu County 310401, Taiwan;
| | - Kuo-Yi Yang
- Biomedical Technology and Device Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Chutung, Hsinchu County 310401, Taiwan; (P.-I.T.); (S.-I.H.); (K.-Y.Y.)
| | - Chih-Yu Chen
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan; (M.-H.W.); (C.-Y.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (T.-J.H.)
- TMU Biodesign Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
- Department of Orthopedics, Shuang-Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 235041, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hao Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Buddhist Tzu-Chi General Hospital, Taichung Branch, Taichung 427213, Taiwan;
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tzu-Chi University, Hualien 970374, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yu Lee
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan; (M.-H.W.); (C.-Y.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (T.-J.H.)
- Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Jen Huang
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110301, Taiwan; (M.-H.W.); (C.-Y.C.); (C.-Y.L.); (T.-J.H.)
- Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110301, Taiwan
| | - Fang-Hei Tsau
- Laser and Additive Manufacturing Technology Center, Southern Region Campus, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Tainan 734045, Taiwan;
| | - Yen-Yao Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi 613016, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333323, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +88653621000 (ext. 2855)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Meng H, Gao Y, Lu P, Zhao GM, Zhang ZC, Sun TS, Li F. Risk factor analysis of disc and facet joint degeneration after intersegmental pedicle screw fixation for lumbar spondylolysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2022; 17:247. [PMID: 35459170 PMCID: PMC9034521 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03082-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients who do not respond to conservative treatment of the isthmus are often treated with surgery. We used direct repair plus intersegment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis. The aim of this observational study was to assess the effects of this technique and evaluate various risk factors potentially predicting the probability of disc and facet joint degeneration after instrumentation. Methods The study included 54 male L5 spondylolysis patients who underwent pars repair and intersegment fixation using pedicle screws. Bony union was evaluated using reconstruction images of computed tomography. Radiographic changes, including disc height, vertebral slip, facet joint and disc degeneration in the grade of adjacent and fixed segments, were determined from before to final follow-up. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the incidence of disc and facet joint degeneration. Results Bony union was achieved in all cases. Logistic regression analysis revealed that instrumentation durations of greater than 15.5 months and 21.0 months were significant risk factors for the incidence of L4/5 and L5S1 facet degeneration, respectively. Conclusions Intersegmental pedicle screw fixation provides good surgical outcomes and good isthmic bony union rates in patients with lumbar spondylolysis. The duration of fixation was confirmed as a risk factor for facet joint degeneration. Once bony union is achieved, instrument removal should be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Meng
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 7th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmen Cang, Beijing, 100700, China.
| | - Yuan Gao
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 1st Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Lu
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 7th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmen Cang, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Guang-Min Zhao
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 7th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmen Cang, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Zhi-Cheng Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 7th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmen Cang, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Tian-Sheng Sun
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 7th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmen Cang, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Fang Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 7th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nanmen Cang, Beijing, 100700, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mortazavi A, Mualem W, Dowlati E, Alexander H, Rotter J, Withington C, Margolis M, Voyadzis JM. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: single institutional review of complications and associated variables. Spine J 2022; 22:454-462. [PMID: 34600108 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT As more patients undergo anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedures and more devices are created for that purpose, it is important to understand the complications that can arise and the variables that mitigate risk for major and minor complications. PURPOSE To assess complication rates after ALIF with or without posterior instrumentation and variables associated with increased likelihood of postoperative complications. We aim to provide this data as benchmarking to improve patient safety and surgical care. STUDY DESIGN A single-center retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE All adult patients who underwent ALIF between 2017 and 2019 was performed OUTCOME MEASURES: Post-operative major and minor complications were evaluated. METHODS Complications were recorded and presented as percentages. Patient demographics, perioperative, and postoperative data were also collected and analyzed between patients who had no complications and those that had any complication. Subgroup analysis of surgical complications were performed by nonparametric Chi-square tests. Continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS Ninty-five of three hundred sixty-two (26.2%) of patients experienced a minor or major complication. Among the most common complications found were surgical site infections (5.8%), neurological complications (4.1%), vascular complications (3.6%), and urinary tract infections (3.3%). Patients undergoing ALIF alone with post-operative complications had higher mean age, higher BMI, higher ASA status, and experienced higher estimated blood loss. Patients undergoing ALIF and posterior instrumentation with post-operative complications were more likely to have diabetes and had a higher ASA status. Patients with any complications from both groups had longer length of stay, discharge to a non-home setting and were more likely to be readmitted or return to the operating room. CONCLUSION Our study reveals variables associated with complications at our institution, including age of the patient, BMI, and ASA status leading to higher complications and greater LOS, higher readmission rates, and disposition to skilled facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Mortazavi
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, 3900 Reservoir Rd, Washington, DC, USA
| | - William Mualem
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, 3900 Reservoir Rd, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ehsan Dowlati
- Department of Neurosurgery, 3800 Reservoir Rd, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Hepzibha Alexander
- Division of Neurosurgery, 16001 W Nine Mile Rd, Ascension Providence Hospital, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Southfield, MI, USA
| | - Juliana Rotter
- Department of Neurological Surgery, 200 1st St NW, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Charles Withington
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, 3900 Reservoir Rd, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Marc Margolis
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, 3800 Reservoir Rd, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jean-Marc Voyadzis
- Department of Neurosurgery, 3800 Reservoir Rd, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Meng H, Gao Y, Zhao G, Sun T, Li F. Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 With Iliac Crest Bone Graft Instead of Iliac Crest Bone Graft Alone in Lumbar Spondylolysis. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35:E314-E319. [PMID: 34654776 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in pars repair of lumbar spondylolysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA BMP-2 is a growth factor that plays a role in the formation of bone and promotes bone healing. However, few studies of using rhBMP-2 in pars repair have been reported. METHODS Direct pars repair and pedicle screw fixation was performed, which were added with 1 mg of rhBMP-2 and iliac crest bone graft in the study group (rhBMP-2 group, n=32) and iliac crest bone graft alone in the autograft group (n=36). Patients completed the visual analog scale and the Oswestry Disability Index preoperation, 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation. Computed tomography scans with axial and sagittal reconstructions were performed at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS Baseline demographic data showed no significant difference between 2 groups. There were significant differences for the Oswestry Disability Index score at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, which were higher in the autograft group. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the overall union status. As for union speed, the trabecular bone appeared earlier and union rates were higher in rhBMP-2 group than in the autograft group at 9, and 12 months postoperatively. No complications were identified in either group. One case in the rhBMP-2 group and 2 cases in the autograft group underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSION Compared with iliac crest bone graft alone, the use of rhBMP-2 can accelerate fusion in pars repair for young patients with spondylolysis. The union rates were significantly different at 9 and 12 months after surgery. This study showed no clinical difference when adding rhBMP-2 compared with iliac crest bone graft alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Meng
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 7th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
| | - Yuan Gao
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The 1st Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guangmin Zhao
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 7th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
| | - Tiansheng Sun
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 7th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
| | - Fang Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 7th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stosch-Wiechert K, Wuertz-Kozak K, Hitzl W, Szeimies U, Stäbler A, Siepe CJ. Clinical and radiological mid- to long-term investigation of anterior lumbar stand-alone fusion: Incidence of reoperation and adjacent segment degeneration. BRAIN AND SPINE 2022; 2:100924. [PMID: 36248179 PMCID: PMC9560690 DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Stosch-Wiechert
- Schön Klinik Vogtareuth, Department of Neurology, Pain Care Center, Krankenhausstr. 20, 83569, Vogtareuth, Germany
- Academic Teaching Hospital and Spine Research Institute, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Corresponding author. Department of Neurology, Pain Care Center, Academic Teaching Hospital and Spine Research Institute of the Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Salzburg, Austria, Krankenhausstr. 20, D-83569, Vogtareuth, Germany.
| | - Karin Wuertz-Kozak
- Academic Teaching Hospital and Spine Research Institute, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Rochester Institute of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 160 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA
| | - Wolfgang Hitzl
- Research Office (Biostatistics), Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 20, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Paracelsus Medical University, Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Müllner Hauptstr. 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Research Program Experimental Ophthalmology and Glaucoma Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Austria
| | - Ulrike Szeimies
- Radiological Institute Munich-Harlaching, Grünwalder Str. 72, 81547, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Stäbler
- Radiological Institute Munich-Harlaching, Grünwalder Str. 72, 81547, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph J. Siepe
- Academic Teaching Hospital and Spine Research Institute, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
- Schön Klinik München Harlaching, Spine Center, Harlachinger Str. 51, 81547, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kiapour A, Massaad E, Joukar A, Hadzipasic M, Shankar GM, Goel VK, Shin JH. Biomechanical analysis of stand-alone lumbar interbody cages versus 360° constructs: an in vitro and finite element investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 2021:1-9. [PMID: 34952510 DOI: 10.3171/2021.9.spine21558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Low fusion rates and cage subsidence are limitations of lumbar fixation with stand-alone interbody cages. Various approaches to interbody cage placement exist, yet the need for supplemental posterior fixation is not clear from clinical studies. Therefore, as prospective clinical studies are lacking, a comparison of segmental kinematics, cage properties, and load sharing on vertebral endplates is needed. This laboratory investigation evaluates the mechanical stability and biomechanical properties of various interbody fixation techniques by performing cadaveric and finite element (FE) modeling studies. METHODS An in vitro experiment using 7 fresh-frozen human cadavers was designed to test intact spines with 1) stand-alone lateral interbody cage constructs (lateral interbody fusion, LIF) and 2) LIF supplemented with posterior pedicle screw-rod fixation (360° constructs). FE and kinematic data were used to validate a ligamentous FE model of the lumbopelvic spine. The validated model was then used to evaluate the stability of stand-alone LIF, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) cages with and without supplemental posterior fixation at the L4-5 level. The FE models of intact and instrumented cases were subjected to a 400-N compressive preload followed by an 8-Nm bending moment to simulate physiological flexion, extension, bending, and axial rotation. Segmental kinematics and load sharing at the inferior endplate were compared. RESULTS The FE kinematic predictions were consistent with cadaveric data. The range of motion (ROM) in LIF was significantly lower than intact spines for both stand-alone and 360° constructs. The calculated reduction in motion with respect to intact spines for stand-alone constructs ranged from 43% to 66% for TLIF, 67%-82% for LIF, and 69%-86% for ALIF in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. In flexion and extension, the maximum reduction in motion was 70% for ALIF versus 81% in LIF for stand-alone cases. When supplemented with posterior fixation, the corresponding reduction in ROM was 76%-87% for TLIF, 86%-91% for LIF, and 90%-92% for ALIF. The addition of posterior instrumentation resulted in a significant reduction in peak stress at the superior endplate of the inferior segment in all scenarios. CONCLUSIONS Stand-alone ALIF and LIF cages are most effective in providing stability in lateral bending and axial rotation and less so in flexion and extension. Supplemental posterior instrumentation improves stability for all interbody techniques. Comparative clinical data are needed to further define the indications for stand-alone cages in lumbar fusion surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Kiapour
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elie Massaad
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amin Joukar
- 2Engineering Center for Orthopedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Department of Bioengineering Engineering, The University of Toledo, Ohio; and.,3School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Muhamed Hadzipasic
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ganesh M Shankar
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vijay K Goel
- 2Engineering Center for Orthopedic Research Excellence (E-CORE), Department of Bioengineering Engineering, The University of Toledo, Ohio; and
| | - John H Shin
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
McGrath KA, Schmidt ES, Loss JG, Gillespie CM, Colbrunn RW, Butler RS, Steinmetz MP. Assessment of L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion stability in the setting of lengthening posterior instrumentation constructs: a cadaveric biomechanical study. J Neurosurg Spine 2021:1-9. [PMID: 34920420 DOI: 10.3171/2021.9.spine21821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Excessive stress and motion at the L5-S1 level can lead to degenerative changes, especially in patients with posterior instrumentation suprajacent to L5. Attention has turned to utilization of L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) to stabilize the lumbosacral junction. However, questions remain regarding the effectiveness of stand-alone ALIF in the setting of prior posterior instrumented fusions terminating at L5. The purpose of this study was to assess the biomechanical stability of an L5-S1 ALIF with increasing lengths of posterior thoracolumbar constructs. METHODS Seven human cadaveric spines (T9-sacrum) were instrumented with pedicle screws from T10 to L5 and mounted to a 6 degrees-of-freedom robot. Posterior fusion construct lengths (T10-L5, T12-L5, L2-5, and L4-5) were instrumented to each specimen, and torque-fusion level relationships were determined for each construct in flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending. A stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF was then instrumented, and L5-S1 motion was measured as increasing pure moments (2 to 12 Nm) were applied. Motion reduction was calculated by comparing L5-S1 motion across the ALIF and non-ALIF states. RESULTS The average motion at L5-S1 in axial rotation, flexion-extension, and lateral bending was assessed for each fusion construct with and without ALIF. After adding ALIF to a posterior fusion, L5-S1 motion was significantly reduced relative to the non-ALIF state in all but one fused surgical condition (p < 0.05). Longer fusions with ALIF produced larger L5-S1 motions, and in some cases resulted in motions higher than native state motion. CONCLUSIONS Posterior fusion constructs up to L4-5 could be appropriately stabilized by a stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF when using a nominal threshold of 80% reduction in native motion as a potential positive indicator of fusion. The results of this study allow conclusions to be drawn from a biomechanical standpoint; however, the clinical implications of these data are not well defined. These findings, when taken in appropriate clinical context, can be used to better guide clinicians seeking to treat L5-S1 pathology in patients with prior posterior thoracolumbar constructs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle A McGrath
- 1Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Eric S Schmidt
- 1Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland.,2Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland
| | - Jeremy G Loss
- 3Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
| | | | - Robb W Colbrunn
- 3Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
| | - Robert S Butler
- 4Department of Quantitative Health Services, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael P Steinmetz
- 1Center for Spine Health, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland.,2Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jones C, Okano I, Salzmann SN, Reisener MJ, Chiapparelli E, Shue J, Sama AA, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Hughes AP. Endplate volumetric bone mineral density is a predictor for cage subsidence following lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a risk factor analysis. Spine J 2021; 21:1729-1737. [PMID: 33716124 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT It has been reported in previous studies that a decreased bone mineral density (BMD) as measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is associated with subsidence. However, there is limited research on the role of volumetric BMD (vBMD) as measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Further, metabolic conditions such as obesity and type 2 diabetes have been associated with poor bone quality, but the impact of these metabolic conditions on on subsidence rates following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) remains unclear. As such, risk factors for subsidence following LLIF is an area of ongoing research. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for subsidence following LLIF with a focus on metabolic conditions and vBMD as measured by QCT. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study at a single academic institution. PATIENT SAMPLE Consecutive patients undergoing LLIF with or without posterior screws from 2014 to 2019 at a single academic institution who had a pre-operative CT and radiological imaging including radiographs or CT scans between 5 and 14 months post-operatively to assess for cage subsidence. OUTCOME MEASURE Subsidence prevalence following LLIF. METHODS We reviewed patients undergoing LLIF with or without posterior screws from 2014 to 2019 with a follow-up ≥5 months. Cage subsidence was assessed using the grading system by Marchi et al. Endplate volumetric BMD (EP-vBMD), vertebral bone volumetric BMD (VB-vBMD), BMI, and diabetes status were measured. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression analyses with a generalized mixed model were conducted. Ad hoc analysis, including receiver operative characteristic curve analysis, was used for identifying the cut-off values in significant continuous variables for subsidence. Chi-Squared and ANOVA tests were used for categorical comparisons. RESULTS Five hundred sixty-seven levels in 347 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean age (± SD) was 61.7 ± 11.1yrs, 50.3% were male, and 89.6% were Caucasian. Subsidence was observed in 160 levels (28.2%). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an absence of posterior screws [OR = 2.854 (1.483 - 5.215), p=.001] and decreased EP-vBMD [0.996 (0.991 - 1.000), p=.032] were associated with an increased risk of subsidence. Increased BMI and diabetes status were not associated with increased rates of subsidence. Patients without posterior screws and low EP-vBMD experienced subsidence at 44.9% of levels. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrated that decreased EP-vBMD and standalone status were significantly associated with increased rates of subsidence following LLIF independent of BMI or diabetes status. Further analysis demonstrated that patients with a decreased EP-vBMD and without posterior screws experienced subsidence nearly 2.5 times higher than patients with no risk factors. In patients with a low EP-vBMD undergoing LLIF, posterior screws should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor Jones
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Ichiro Okano
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Stephan N Salzmann
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | - Erika Chiapparelli
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Jennifer Shue
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Andrew A Sama
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Frank P Cammisa
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Federico P Girardi
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Alexander P Hughes
- Spine Care Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th S, New York, NY 10021, USA..
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Singhatanadgige W, Sukthuayat A, Tanaviriyachai T, Kongtharvonskul J, Tanasansomboon T, Kerr SJ, Limthongkul W. Risk factors for polyetheretherketone cage subsidence following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:2557-2565. [PMID: 34297205 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04923-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interbody cage subsidence is a postoperative complication leading to poor outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). This study aimed to identify risk factors of cage subsidence in lumbar spinal diseases after MIS-TLIF using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, plain radiographs and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) performed 12 months after MIS-TLIF were evaluated, and the risk of cage subsidence was calculated with odds ratio (OR), confidence interval (CI), and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 114 patients (mean age, 65 years) and 135 levels were included in this study: 80 (59.3%) with and 55 (40.7%) without cage subsidence. Multifidus atrophy showed the strongest association with PEEK cage subsidence (p < 0.001). Compared to those with normal mass, the odds of PEEK cage subsidence were 76.0 (95% CI: 3.9-1472.9) for severe atrophy. The factors significantly associated with cage subsistence were posterior cage position (OR = 4.2; p = 0.005), cage height ≥ 12 mm (OR = 7.6; p = 0.008), use of an autograft mixed with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) (OR = 5.8; p = 0.002), body mass index (BMI) > 27.5 kg/m2 (OR = 4.2; p = 0.03), and titanium-coated PEEK (Ti-PEEK) cage-type (OR = 38.4, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In MIS-TLIF with a PEEK cage, the factors associated with an increased risk of cage subsidence were higher BMI, increased severity of multifidus muscle atrophy, Ti-coated PEEK cage-type, cage height ≥ 12 mm, use of DBM mixed autograft, and posterior cage position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weerasak Singhatanadgige
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
- Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Amnat Sukthuayat
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Terdpong Tanaviriyachai
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
- Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Teerachat Tanasansomboon
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Stephen J Kerr
- Biostatistics Excellence Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Worawat Limthongkul
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
- Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dowlati E, Alexander H, Voyadzis JM. Vulnerability of the L5 nerve root during anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1: case series and review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 49:E7. [PMID: 32871560 DOI: 10.3171/2020.6.focus20315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Nerve root injuries associated with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) are uncommonly reported in the literature. This case series and review aims to describe the etiology of L5 nerve root injury following ALIF at L5-S1. METHODS The authors performed a single-center retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent surgery between 2017 and 2019 who had postoperative L5 nerve root injuries after stand-alone L5-S1 ALIF. They also reviewed the literature with regard to nerve root injuries after ALIF procedures. RESULTS The authors report on 3 patients with postoperative L5 radiculopathy. All 3 patients had pain that improved. Two of the 3 patients had a neurological deficit, one of which improved. CONCLUSIONS Stretch neuropraxia from overdistraction is an important cause of postoperative L5 radiculopathy after L5-S1 ALIF. Judicious use of implants and careful preoperative planning to determine optimal implant sizes are paramount.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehsan Dowlati
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital; and
| | | | - Jean-Marc Voyadzis
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital; and
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhao L, Zeng J, Xie T, Pu X, Lu Y. [Advances in research on Cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2021; 35:1063-1067. [PMID: 34387439 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202104036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Objective To summarize the advances in research on Cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion, and provide reference for its prevention. Methods The definition, development, clinical significance, and related risk factors of Cage subsidence following lumbar interbody fusion were throughout reviewed by referring to relevant domestic and doreign literature in recent years. Results At present, there is no consensus on the definition of Cage subsidence, and mostly accepted as the disk height reduction greater than 2 mm. Cage subsidence mainly occurs in the early postoperative stage, which weakens the radiological surgical outcome, and may further damage the effectiveness or even lead to surgical failure. Cage subsidence is closely related to the Cage size and its placement location, intraoperative endplate preparation, morphological matching of disk space to Cage, bone mineral density, body mass index, and so on. Conclusion The appropriate size and shape of the Cage usage, the posterolateral Cage placed, the gentle endplate operation to prevent injury, the active perioperative anti-osteoporosis treatment, and the education of patients to control body weight may help to prevent Cage subsidence and ensure good surgical results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China
| | - Jiancheng Zeng
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China
| | - Tianhang Xie
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China
| | - Xingxiao Pu
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China
| | - Yufei Lu
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P.R.China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ahlquist S, Thommen R, Park HY, Sheppard W, James K, Lord E, Shamie AN, Park DY. Implications of sagittal alignment and complication profile with stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior posterior lumbar fusion. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2020; 6:659-669. [PMID: 33447668 DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is commonly utilized in lumbar degenerative pathologies. Standalone ALIF (ST-ALIF) systems were developed to avoid added morbidity, surgical time, and cost of anterior and posterior fusion (APF). Controversy exists in the literature about which of these two techniques yields superior clinical and radiographic outcomes, and few studies have directly compared them. This study seeks to compare ST-ALIF and APF in terms of sagittal correction and surgical complications. Methods Ninty-two consecutive ALIF cases performed from 2013-2018 were retrospectively reviewed and separated into 2 groups. Radiographic measurements were performed on pre- and post-operative radiographs, including segmental lordosis (SL), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL). Surgical complications were determined. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test of homogeneity, Fisher's exact test, and independent sample t-test. Comparisons between groups were deemed statistically significant at the P<0.05 threshold. Results Fifty-seven ST-ALIF, 35 APF were identified. There were no differences in age, gender, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), preoperative diagnosis, or surgical level between the 2 cohorts. Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) was utilized in 24.6% of ST-ALIF versus none of APF (P=0.001). No differences were detected in SL, LL, and PI-LL mismatch. ST-ALIF cohort had significantly greater risk of subsidence and revision surgery versus APF (12.3% vs. 0%, RD 95% CI: 3.8-20.8%, P=0.042). Recurrent spondylolisthesis occurred in 5 ST-ALIF cases, 3 cases with implant failure, and 2 nonunions versus none in the APF group. Conclusions ST-ALIF was associated with significantly greater subsidence and revision surgery versus APF. Careful patient selection is paramount when considering ST-ALIF. The potential for revision surgery may offset the potential benefit in avoiding posterior fusion. Despite the greater risk of subsidence, sagittal alignment was not significantly affected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth Ahlquist
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Rachel Thommen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Howard Y Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - William Sheppard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Kevin James
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Lord
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Arya N Shamie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Don Y Park
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence in Patients Received Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2020; 45:E1279-E1285. [PMID: 32472823 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To determine the risk factors of cage subsidence in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) and its correlation with patient-reported outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Cage subsidence is among the cage-related complications after TLIF and may lead to poor outcomes. Few studies have addressed the incidence of cage subsidence in MI-TLIF. METHODS This retrospective study of a prospectively collected database was conducted from October 2015 to October 2017. All patients received MI-TLIF with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. All levels were separated into the cage subsidence (CS group) and no cage subsidence (non-CS group) groups. Cage subsidence was evaluated using lateral radiographs and defined as more than 2 mm migration of the cage into the endplate of adjacent vertebral body. Patient demographics, perioperative details, and radiographic parameters were recorded. Cage-related parameters were cage height, cage insertion level, and cage position. Cage position was recorded using central point ration (CPR). Patient-reported outcome was analyzed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS Ninety-three patients (126 levels) were included. Mean age was 66.5 years with an average follow-up of 36.9 months. Overall incidence of cage subsidence was 34.1%. The CS group had significantly higher body mass index, less bone mineral density (BMD), shorter disc height, and higher CPR than the non-CS group. BMD, disc height, and CPR were significantly negatively correlated with depth of cage subsidence. ODI improvement was significantly lesser in the CS group than in the non-CS group. Fusion rate and complications were unrelated to cage subsidence. CONCLUSION The BMD, disc height, and cage position were the most significant risk factors that were negatively correlated with depth of cage subsidence. Placing a TLIF cage anteriorly if possible may reduce the risk of cage subsidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
30
|
Outcomes of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion of L5-S1 using a novel implant with anterior plate fixation. Spine J 2020; 20:1618-1628. [PMID: 32504869 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Compared with other approaches, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is believed to be more effective at restoring segmental lordosis and reducing risks of adjacent-segment disease. It remains controversial, however, whether ALIF improves global lumbar lordosis or influences pelvic parameters, possibly because of the heterogeneity of implants and levels studied. PURPOSE To report clinical outcomes of stand-alone ALIF with anterior plate fixation for L5-S1 and to determine the effect on global lumbar lordosis and pelvic parameters. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients that underwent isolated mini-ALIF with anterior plate fixation for L5-S1. OUTCOME MEASURES Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form 12, lower back and legs pain on Visual Analog Scale, as well as spino-pelvic parameters. METHODS The authors reviewed the records of all patients that underwent retroperitoneal mini-ALIF for single-level L5-S1 fusion between August 2012 and December 2016. A total of 129 patients were included, but 9 patients had incomplete preoperative radiographic data, and one patient had schizophrenia and was unable to respond to outcome questionnaires, leaving 119 patients eligible for outcome assessment. At a minimum follow-up of 1 year, seven patients refused to participate in the study or could not be reached, which left a final cohort of 112 patients. RESULTS Nine patients were reoperated without implant removal (four pseudarthrosis, two hematomas, one sepsis, one L4-L5 disc hernia, and one L4-L5 disc degeneration). At a mean of 20±9 months, all scores improved significantly from baseline values, with net improvement in ODI of 23.3±19.9. Multivariable analyses confirmed better postoperative ODI in patients that received 18° cages (β=-9.0, p=.017), but revealed no significant trends for net improvement in ODI. Comparison of preoperative and last follow-up radiographs revealed that global lumbar lordosis increased by 4.2±7.1° (p<.001), L5-S1 segmental lordosis increased by 11.8±6.7° (p<.001), and L4-L5 segmental lordosis decreased by 1.9±3.3° (p<.001). All pelvic parameters changed: pelvic incidence increased by 0.6±2.7° (p=.003), pelvic tilt decreased by 2.5±4.1° (p<.001) and sacral slope increased by 3.3±4.7° (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS Stand-alone mini-ALIF with anterior plate fixation for L5-S1 can change pelvic parameters while improving global and segmental lumbar lordosis. The procedure resulted in a fusion rate of 96% and comparable improvements in ODI to other studies.
Collapse
|
31
|
Parrish JM, Jenkins NW, Nolte MT, Massel DH, Hrynewycz NM, Brundage TS, Myers JA, Singh K. Predictors of inpatient admission in the setting of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a Minimally Invasive Spine Study Group (MISSG) investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:446-454. [PMID: 32442965 DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.spine20134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedure may be amenable to ambulatory surgery, it has been hypothesized that limitations such as the risk of postoperative ileus and vascular complications have hindered transition of this procedure to the outpatient setting. Identification of independent risk factors predisposing patients to inpatient stays of ≥ 24 hours after ALIF may facilitate better postsurgical outcomes, target modifiable risk factors, and assist in the development of screening tools to transition appropriate patients to the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) setting for this procedure. The purpose of this study was to identify the most relevant risk factors that predispose patients to ≥ 24-hour admission following ALIF. METHODS A prospectively maintained surgical registry was reviewed for patients undergoing single ALIF between May 2006 and December 2019. Demographics, preoperative diagnosis, perioperative variables, and postoperative complications were evaluated according to their relative risk (RR) elevation for an inpatient stay of ≥ 24 hours. A Poisson regression model was used to evaluate predictors of inpatient stays of ≥ 24 hours. Risk factors for inpatient admission of ≥ 24 hours were identified with a stepwise backward regression model. RESULTS A total of 111 patients underwent single-level ALIF (50.9% female and 52.6% male, ≤ 50 years old). Eleven (9.5%) patients were discharged in < 24 hours and 116 remained admitted for ≥ 24 hours. The average inpatient stay was > 2 days (53.7 hours). The most common postoperative complications were fever (body temperature ≥ 100.4°F; n = 4, 3.5%) and blood transfusions (n = 4, 3.5%). Bivariate analysis revealed a preoperative diagnosis of retrolisthesis or lateral listhesis to elevate the RR for an inpatient stay of ≥ 24 hours (RR 1.11, p = 0.001, both diagnoses). Stepwise multivariate analysis demonstrated significant predictors for inpatient stays of ≥ 24 hours to be an operation on L4-5, coexisting degenerative disc disease (DDD) with foraminal stenosis, and herniated nucleus pulposus (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20, p = 0.009, all covariates). CONCLUSIONS This study provides data regarding the incidence of demographic and perioperative characteristics and postoperative complications as they pertain to patients undergoing single-level ALIF. This preliminary investigation identified the most relevant risk factors to be considered before appropriately transitioning ALIF procedures to the ASC. Further studies of preoperative characteristics are needed to elucidate ideal ASC ALIF patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Parrish
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nathaniel W Jenkins
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael T Nolte
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Dustin H Massel
- 2Department of Orthopaedics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Florida; and
| | - Nadia M Hrynewycz
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Thomas S Brundage
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jonathan A Myers
- 3Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kern Singh
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Verma R, Virk S, Qureshi S. Interbody Fusions in the Lumbar Spine: A Review. HSS J 2020; 16:162-167. [PMID: 32523484 PMCID: PMC7253570 DOI: 10.1007/s11420-019-09737-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lumbar interbody fusion is among the most common types of spinal surgery performed. Over time, the term has evolved to encompass a number of different approaches to the intervertebral space, as well as differing implant materials. Questions remain over which approaches and materials are best for achieving fusion and restoring disc height. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We reviewed the literature on the advantages and disadvantages of various methods and devices used to achieve and augment fusion between the disc spaces in the lumbar spine. METHODS Using search terms specific to lumbar interbody fusion, we searched PubMed and Google Scholar and identified 4993 articles. We excluded those that did not report clinical outcomes, involved cervical interbody devices, were animal studies, or were not in English. After exclusions, 68 articles were included for review. RESULTS Posterior approaches have advantages, such as providing 360° support through a single incision, but can result in retraction injury and do not always restore lordosis or correct deformity. Anterior approaches allow for the largest implants and good correction of deformities but can result in vascular, urinary, psoas muscle, or lumbar plexus injury and may require a second posterior procedure to supplement fixation. Titanium cages produce improved osteointegration and fusion rates but also increase subsidence caused by the stiffness of titanium relative to bone. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has an elasticity closer to that of bone and shows less subsidence than titanium cages, but as an inert compound PEEK results in lower fusion rates and greater osteolysis. Combination PEEK-titanium coating has not yet achieved better results. Expandable cages were developed to increase disc height and restore lumbar lordosis, but the data on their effectiveness have been inconclusive. Three-dimensionally (3D)-printed cages have shown promise in biomechanical and animal studies at increasing fusion rates and reducing subsidence, but additive manufacturing options are still in their infancy and require more investigation. CONCLUSIONS All of the approaches to spinal fusion have plusses and minuses that must be considered when determining which to use, and newer-technology implants, such as PEEK with titanium coating, expandable, and 3D-printed cages, have tried to improve upon the limitations of existing grafts but require further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Verma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY 10021 USA
| | - Sohrab Virk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY 10021 USA
| | - Sheeraz Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY 10021 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Minimal-invasive Stand-alone-Fusion des lumbosakralen Übergangs. OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE 2020; 32:192-199. [DOI: 10.1007/s00064-020-00661-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
34
|
Ramakrishna VAS, Chamoli U, Rajan G, Mukhopadhyay SC, Prusty BG, Diwan AD. Smart orthopaedic implants: A targeted approach for continuous postoperative evaluation in the spine. J Biomech 2020; 104:109690. [PMID: 32139096 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Real-time health monitoring systems are emerging in diverse medical fields, tracking biological and physiological signals for direct feedback to the user. Orthopaedics is yet to adapt to innovative trends in health monitoring. Despite an evident entry point during orthopaedic surgeries, clinicians remain unable to objectively examine the structural integrity and biomechanics in the operated region through implantable sensors. As such, postoperative advice can be non-specific and poorly guided. This perspective discusses the clinical need for load-sensing implants that address biomechanical postoperative monitoring, taking the example of spinal interbody cages. Research has attempted to establish sensing approaches in different orthopaedic settings; however, they fail to meet mechanical sensing requirements or lack in vivo translatability, especially in the spine. Polymeric flexible sensors and Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) have favourable attributes aligned to the required features for in vivo load-sensing, although these approaches are yet to be tested extensively in orthopaedics. While inductive powering is promising, wireless energy transfer and telemetry are areas of ongoing research. This perspective proposes a thorough understanding of the relevant biomechanics to identify the pertinent sensing parameters, concurrent treatment of sensing and powering aspects, and utilisation of energy harvesting for sensing and data transmission. While sensing advancements have contributed to the rise of real-time health monitoring in other fields of medicine, orthopaedics has so far been overlooked. It is the application of these innovations that will lead to the development of a new generation of 'smart' implants for continuous postoperative evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek A S Ramakrishna
- School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia; Spine Labs, St. George & Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Uphar Chamoli
- Spine Labs, St. George & Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Ginu Rajan
- School of Electrical, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Subhas C Mukhopadhyay
- School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - B Gangadhara Prusty
- School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ashish D Diwan
- Spine Labs, St. George & Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery St. George Hospital Campus, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kolcun JPG, Ghobrial GM, Crandall KM, Chang KHK, Pacchiorotti G, Wang MY. Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Meshed Allograft Containment Device: Analysis of Subsidence With 12-Month Minimum Follow-Up. Int J Spine Surg 2019; 13:321-328. [PMID: 31531282 PMCID: PMC6724751 DOI: 10.14444/6044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We have previously reported the use of a minimally invasive allograft-filled expandable meshed-bag containment system in the lumbar spine. Subsidence has not been reported with this device. In this retrospective case series, we describe subsidence after lumbar interbody fusion using this device, with 12-month minimum radiographic follow-up. Methods Consecutive adult patients that underwent 1- or 2-level interbody fusion with at least 1 year of follow-up were included in this study. Preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up lumbar radiographs were analyzed to measure disc height at the anterior and posterior margins of the disc space, as well as the neuroforaminal height. Results Forty-one patients were identified, with a mean age of 63.4 years (± 11.8). A total of 61 levels were treated, with successful fusion observed in 54 levels (88.5%). The mean radiographic follow-up was 24.3 months (± 11.2). The mean disc height pre- and postoperatively was 6.9 mm (± 3.2) and 10.1 mm (± 2.9, P < .001), respectively. The mean disc height at final follow-up was 8.3 mm (± 2.4). Average disc height subsidence was 1.8 mm (± 1.7, P < .001). Overall, average disc height increased by a net 1.3 mm (± 2.5, P < .001). The mean neuroforaminal height pre- and postoperatively was 18.0 mm (± 3.3) and 20.7 mm (± 3.6, P < .001), respectively. The mean neuroforaminal height at final follow-up was 19.2 mm (± 3.4). Average neuroforaminal height subsidence was 1.3 mm (± 3.4, P = .012). Overall, average neuroforaminal height increased by a net 1.7 mm (± 2.8, P = .004). No significant difference in subsidence was observed between 1- and 2-level surgeries. Conclusion An expandable allograft containment system is a feasible alternative for lumbar interbody fusion. Due to its biologic and mechanical nature, the surgeon using such constructs should account for an anticipated average of 18% loss of interbody height due to subsidence during the bony remodeling/fusion process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Paul G Kolcun
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - George M Ghobrial
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Kenneth M Crandall
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Ken Hsuan-Kan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Michael Y Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Clinical Outcome After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a New Osteoinductive Bone Substitute Material: A Randomized Clinical Pilot Study. Clin Spine Surg 2019; 32:E319-E325. [PMID: 30730430 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000000802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Pilot, single-center, single-blinded, parallel-group, randomized clinical study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to pilot a randomized clinical study to evaluate whether instrumented anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with a new nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite embedded in a silica gel matrix (NH-SiO2) leads to superior radiologic and clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up compared with instrumented ALIF with homologous bone. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA ALIF completed with interbody cages is an established technique for performing arthrodesis of the lumbar spine. There is ongoing discussion about which cage-filling material is most appropriate. This is the first study to assess the efficacy of NH-SiO2 in ALIF surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS This randomized, clinical, pilot trial included 2 groups of 20 patients with monosegmental or multisegmental degenerative disease of the lumbar spine who were suitable to undergo monosegmental or bisegmental ALIF fusion at the level L4/L5 and L5/S1 with a carbon fiber reinforced polymer ALIF cage filled with either NH-SiO2 or homogenous bone. Primary outcome was postoperative disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes were postoperative radiographic outcomes, pain, and quality of life. Patients were followed 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS Mean (±SD) 12-month ODI was 24±17 in the NH-SiO2 group and 27±19 in the homologous bone group (P=0.582). Postoperative radiography, functional outcomes, and quality-of-life indices did not differ significantly between groups at any of the regularly scheduled follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS This clinical study showed similar functional, radiologic, and clinical outcomes 12 months postoperatively for instrumented ALIF procedures with the use of NH-SiO2 or homologous bone as cage filling. In the absence of any relevant differences in outcome, we postulate that the pivotal clinical study should be designed as an equivalence trial.
Collapse
|
37
|
Wu WJ, Li Y, Hou TY, Cheng P, Zhang ZH, Xu JZ, Luo F. Application of New Allogeneic Lumbar Fusion Cage (Biocage) in Single-Segment Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Prospective Controlled Study with Follow-Up for ≥2 Years. World Neurosurg 2019; 126:e1309-e1314. [PMID: 30898751 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Revised: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated the clinical efficacy of the Biocage in lumbar fusion surgery and its safety and effectiveness. METHODS A total of 431 patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative disease diagnosed from January 2013 to December 2016 were considered for the present prospective, nonrandomized, and controlled study; 52 patient met the exclusion criteria and were excluded. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to their cage choice: Biocage (n = 206) and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cage (n = 173). The patients were followed up for 24-48 months (average, 32). The operative time, blood loss, hospitalization duration, mean intervertebral fusion segment height, height of intervertebral foramen, fusion time, fusion rate, internal fixation failure rate, visual analog scale score, and Oswestry disability index were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS All the patients underwent surgery successfully. No significant differences were found in gender, age, clinical diagnosis, lesion segment, operative time, blood loss, visual analog scale score, or Oswestry disability index between the 2 groups. No significant differences were found in the fusion rate; however, the Biocage group had a greater fusion rate and shorter fusion time than the PEEK group. During follow-up, the mean intervertebral height recovered significantly in the Biocage group compared with the PPEK group (P < 0.05). The height of the intervertebral foramen was significantly different between the 2 groups, and recovery was better in the Biocage group (P < 0.05). The Cobb angle of fusion segment in both groups improved significantly postoperatively compared with preoperatively (P < 0.05). The improvement in Cobb angle was significantly different between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The Biocage has excellent clinical efficacy in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Although the Biocage achieved good therapeutic effects, it did not show obvious advantages compared with the PEEK cage. Therefore, the Biocage can only be used as a choice of bone graft materials for lumbar fusion surgery and should not completely replace the PEEK cage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Jie Wu
- National and Regional Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopedics, First Hospital Affiliated to Army Military University (Southwest Hospital), Chongqing, China
| | - Yang Li
- National and Regional Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopedics, First Hospital Affiliated to Army Military University (Southwest Hospital), Chongqing, China
| | - Tian-Yong Hou
- National and Regional Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopedics, First Hospital Affiliated to Army Military University (Southwest Hospital), Chongqing, China
| | - Peng Cheng
- National and Regional Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopedics, First Hospital Affiliated to Army Military University (Southwest Hospital), Chongqing, China
| | - Ze-Hua Zhang
- National and Regional Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopedics, First Hospital Affiliated to Army Military University (Southwest Hospital), Chongqing, China
| | - Jian-Zhong Xu
- National and Regional Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopedics, First Hospital Affiliated to Army Military University (Southwest Hospital), Chongqing, China
| | - Fei Luo
- National and Regional Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopedics, First Hospital Affiliated to Army Military University (Southwest Hospital), Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Palepu V, Helgeson MD, Molyneaux-Francis M, Nagaraja S. The Effects of Bone Microstructure on Subsidence Risk for ALIF, LLIF, PLIF, and TLIF Spine Cages. J Biomech Eng 2019; 141:2718206. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4042181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Several approaches (anterior, posterior, lateral, and transforaminal) are used in lumbar fusion surgery. However, it is unclear whether one of these approaches has the greatest subsidence risk as published clinical rates of cage subsidence vary widely (7–70%). Specifically, there is limited data on how a patient's endplate morphometry and trabecular bone quality influences cage subsidence risk. Therefore, this study compared subsidence (stiffness, maximum force, and work) between anterior (ALIF), lateral (LLIF), posterior (PLIF), and transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion cage designs to understand the impact of endplate and trabecular bone quality on subsidence. Forty-eight lumbar vertebrae were imaged with micro-ct to assess trabecular microarchitecture. micro-ct images of each vertebra were then imported into image processing software to measure endplate thickness (ET) and maximum endplate concavity depth (ECD). Generic ALIF, LLIF, PLIF, and TLIF cages made of polyether ether ketone were implanted on the superior endplates of all vertebrae and subsidence testing was performed. The results indicated that TLIF cages had significantly lower (p < 0.01) subsidence stiffness and maximum subsidence force compared to ALIF and LLIF cages. For all cage groups, trabecular bone volume fraction was better correlated with maximum subsidence force compared to ET and concavity depth. These findings highlight the importance of cage design (e.g., surface area), placement on the endplate, and trabecular bone quality on subsidence. These results may help surgeons during cage selection for lumbar fusion procedures to mitigate adverse events such as cage subsidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Palepu
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Applied Mechanics, Silver Spring, MD 20993
| | - Melvin D. Helgeson
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Bethesda, MD 20889
| | - Michael Molyneaux-Francis
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Applied Mechanics, Silver Spring, MD 20993
| | - Srinidhi Nagaraja
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Applied Mechanics, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Building 62, Room 2210, Silver Spring, MD 20993 e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Clinical and radiological outcomes after stand-alone ALIF for single L5-S1 degenerative discopathy using a PEEK cage filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles without bone graft. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018; 168:24-29. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2017] [Revised: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
40
|
Wang L, Kang J, Shi L, Fu J, Li D, Guo Z, Liu C, Dong S, Jiang X. Investigation into factors affecting the mechanical behaviours of a patient-specific vertebral body replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2018; 232:378-387. [PMID: 29383959 DOI: 10.1177/0954411918754926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Most vertebral body implants that are currently designed and produced in batches have difficulty meeting the patient-specific demands. Moreover, several complications, including a low fusion rate, subsidence occurrence, and rod displacement, are associated with these implants. This study aims to investigate the effects of patient-specific geometric and clinical parameters on the biomechanics of a vertebral body replacement. A three-dimensional patient-specific vertebral body replacement model was established as the basic model for parametric studies, including the anatomic design of the endplates, tilting angle, thickness, and dislocation of the vertebral body implant. A finite element analysis was applied to determine the stress distribution of the vertebral body implant when under various loading conditions. The model with an anatomical interfacing design generates 75% less stress concentration compared to a flat design; the peak stress of the model with a tilted angle closely matching the replaced vertebra segment is decreased by 30%; and the thickness close to the cortical bone can offer better bone growth capability and long-term stability. Patient-specific geometrical parameters were found to significantly affect the biomechanics of a vertebral body replacement, and therefore, a design customized especially for the endplates is necessary for better stability and long-term longevity of the prostheses. Regardless of such progress, how to balance the stability of a vertebral body implant and the safety of the peripheral nervous system remains a clinical challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Wang
- State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing System Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Jianfeng Kang
- State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing System Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Lei Shi
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Jun Fu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Dichen Li
- State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing System Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Zheng Guo
- Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Chaozong Liu
- John Scale Centre for Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
| | - Shuangpeng Dong
- Tianjin Medical Device Supervision and Testing Center, Tianjin, China
| | - Xi Jiang
- Tianjin Medical Device Supervision and Testing Center, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Motion preservation following total lumbar disc replacement at the lumbosacral junction: a prospective long-term clinical and radiographic investigation. Spine J 2018; 18:72-80. [PMID: 28673830 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Revised: 04/27/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) intends to avoid fusion-related negative side effects by means of motion preservation. Despite their widespread use, the adequate quality and quantity of motion, as well as the correlation between radiographic data with the patient's clinical symptomatology, remains to be established. Long-term data are lacking in particular. PURPOSE This study aimed to perform a clinical and radiographic long-term investigation following TDR with special emphasis on motion preservation assessment and to establish any potential correlation with patient-reported outcome parameters. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING A prospective, single-center, clinical, and radiological investigation following TDR with ProDisc II (Synthes, Paoli, PA, USA) was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up (FU) after TDR performed for the treatment of intractable and predominant (≥80%) axial low back pain resulting from single-level degenerative disc disease without instabilities or deformities at the lumbosacral junction (L5-S1) comprised the sample. OUTCOME MEASURES Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and patient satisfaction rates (three-scale outcome rating), range of motion (ROM) at the index- and cranially adjacent level as well as segmental lumbar lordosis (SLL) and global lumbar lordosis (GLL) were the outcome measures. METHODS All data were acquired within the framework of an ongoing prospective clinical trial. Patients were examined preoperatively, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. X-rays were performed in antero-posterior and lateral views as well as functional flexion/extension images. Radiological examinations included ROM at the index and cranially adjacent level as well as SLL and GLL. X-ray measurements were correlated with the clinical outcome parameters. A longitudinal analysis was performed between baseline data with those from the early (3-6 months), mid- (12-24 months), and late FU stages (≥5 years). RESULTS Results from 51 patients with a mean FU of 7.8 years (range 5.0-13.3 years) were available for the final analysis. X-ray measurements revealed a maintained mobility with a trend toward gradually declining ROM values. Although no statistically significant difference in ROM was detected between the preoperative and early FU (6.8° vs. 5.8°, p=.1), a further reduction in ROM became statistically significant at the mid- and final FU, with mean ROM of 5.2° and 4.4°, respectively (p<.001). Global lumbar lordosis increased from 48.8° to 54.4° (p<.0001) which was attributed to a lordotic shift from 18.2° to 28.0° at the index segment (p<.00001) and which was positively correlated with the applied implant lordosis (p<.05). A compensatory reduction of lordosis was observed at the cranially adjacent segment (p<.0001). The mobility of the cranially adjacent level remained unchanged (p>.05). The clinical outcome scores (VAS, ODI) revealed a significant improvement from baseline levels (p<.05). The reduction in ROM was not negatively correlated with the patient's clinical symptomatology (p>.05). CONCLUSION The present data reveal an increased GLL resulting from a lordotic shift of the index segment, which was strongly correlated with the applied implant lordosis. This lordotic shift was accompanied by a compensatory reduction of lordosis at the cranially adjacent segment. A gradual and statistically significant decline of the device mobility was noted over time which, however, did not negatively impact the patient's clinical symptomatology. Although the present long-term investigation provides additional insight into longitudinal radiographic changes and their influence on the patient's clinical symptomatology following TDR, the adequate quality and quantity of motion with artificial motion-preserving implants remains to be established, which will aid in defining more refined treatment concepts for both fusion and motion preserving techniques alike.
Collapse
|
42
|
Evaluation of Two Novel Integrated Stand-Alone Spacer Designs Compared with Anterior and Anterior-Posterior Single-Level Lumbar Fusion Techniques: An In Vitro Biomechanical Investigation. Asian Spine J 2017; 11:854-862. [PMID: 29279739 PMCID: PMC5738305 DOI: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.6.854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Revised: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Study Design In vitro biomechanical investigation. Purpose To compare the biomechanics of integrated three-screw and four-screw anterior interbody spacer devices and traditional techniques for treatment of degenerative disc disease. Overview of Literature Biomechanical literature describes investigations of operative techniques and integrated devices with four dual-stacked, diverging interbody screws; four alternating, converging screws through a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) spacer; and four converging screws threaded within the PEEK spacer. Conflicting reports on the stability of stand-alone devices and the influence of device design on biomechanics warrant investigation. Methods Fourteen cadaveric lumbar spines were divided randomly into two equal groups (n=7). Each spine was tested intact, after discectomy (injured), and with PEEK interbody spacer alone (S), anterior lumbar plate and spacer (AP+S), bilateral pedicle screws and spacer (BPS+S), circumferential fixation with spacer and anterior lumbar plate supplemented with BPS, and three-screw (SA3s) or four-screw (SA4s) integrated spacers. Constructs were tested in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). Researchers performed one-way analysis of variance and independent t-testing (p≤0.05). Results Instrumented constructs showed significantly decreased motion compared with intact except the spacer-alone construct in FE and AR (p≤0.05). SA3s showed significantly decreased range of motion (ROM) compared with AP+S in LB (p≤0.05) and comparable ROM in FE and AR. The three-screw design increased stability in FE and LB with no significant differences between integrated spacers or between integrated spacers and BPS+S in all loading modes. Conclusions Integrated spacers provided fixation statistically equivalent to traditional techniques. Comparison of three-screw and four-screw integrated anterior lumbar interbody fusion spacers revealed no significant differences, but the longer, larger-diameter interbody spacer with three-screw design increased stabilization in FE and LB; the diverging four-screw design showed marginal improvement during AR.
Collapse
|
43
|
Chatham LS, Patel VV, Yakacki CM, Dana Carpenter R. Interbody Spacer Material Properties and Design Conformity for Reducing Subsidence During Lumbar Interbody Fusion. J Biomech Eng 2017; 139:2613838. [PMID: 28334320 DOI: 10.1115/1.4036312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
There is a need to better understand the effects of intervertebral spacer material and design on the stress distribution in vertebral bodies and endplates to help reduce complications such as subsidence and improve outcomes following lumbar interbody fusion. The main objective of this study was to investigate the effects of spacer material on the stress and strain in the lumbar spine after interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation. A standard spacer was also compared with a custom-fit spacer, which conformed to the vertebral endplates, to determine if a custom fit would reduce stress on the endplates. A finite element (FE) model of the L4-L5 motion segment was developed from computed tomography (CT) images of a cadaveric lumbar spine. An interbody spacer, pedicle screws, and posterior rods were incorporated into the image-based model. The model was loaded in axial compression, and strain and stress were determined in the vertebra, spacer, and rods. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), titanium, poly(para-phenylene) (PPP), and porous PPP (70% by volume) were used as the spacer material to quantify the effects on stress and strain in the system. Experimental testing of a cadaveric specimen was used to validate the model's results. There were no large differences in stress levels (<3%) at the bone-spacer interfaces and the rods when PEEK was used instead of titanium. Use of the porous PPP spacer produced an 8-15% decrease of stress at the bone-spacer interfaces and posterior rods. The custom-shaped spacer significantly decreased (>37%) the stress at the bone-spacer interfaces for all materials tested. A 28% decrease in stress was found in the posterior rods with the custom spacer. Of all the spacer materials tested with the custom spacer design, 70% porous PPP resulted in the lowest stress at the bone-spacer interfaces. The results show the potential for more compliant materials to reduce stress on the vertebral endplates postsurgery. The custom spacer provided a greater contact area between the spacer and bone, which distributed the stress more evenly, highlighting a possible strategy to decrease the risk of subsidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lillian S Chatham
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204
| | - Vikas V Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Christopher M Yakacki
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204
| | - R Dana Carpenter
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Mini-open Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Oblique Self-anchored Stand-alone Cages for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study With 2-year Follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017; 42:E1259-E1265. [PMID: 28277385 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of mini-open ALIF (MO-ALIF) with self-anchored stand-alone cages for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Currently, whether ALIF is superior to TLIF for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation remains controversial. METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed 82 patients who underwent MO-ALIF with self-anchored standalone cages (n = 42) or TLIF (n = 40) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation between April 2013 and October 2014. Patient demographics, intraoperative parameters, and perioperative complications were collated. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) scoring, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for pain in the leg and back, and radiological outcomes, including fusion, lumbar lordosis (LL), disc height (DH), and cage subsidence were evaluated at each follow-up for up to 2 years. RESULTS Patients who underwent TLIF had a significantly higher volume of blood loss (295.2 ± 81.4 vs. 57.0 ± 15.2 mL) and longer surgery time (130.7 ± 45.1 vs. 60.4 ± 20.8 min) than those who had MO-ALIF. Compared with baseline, both groups had significant improvements in the VAS and ODI scores and DH and LL postoperatively, though no significant difference was found between the two groups regarding these indexes. All patients reached solid fusion at the final follow-up in both groups. Three patients (3/42) with three levels (3/50) suffered from cage subsidence in the MO-ALIF group; meanwhile, no cage subsidence occurred in the TLIF group. CONCLUSION MO-ALIF with self-anchored stand-alone cages is a safe and effective treatment of lumbar disc herniation with less surgical trauma and similar clinical and radiological outcomes compared with TLIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
45
|
Phan K, Rogers P, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ. Influence of Obesity on Complications, Clinical Outcome, and Subsidence After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF): Prospective Observational Study. World Neurosurg 2017; 107:334-341. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
46
|
Lao L, Cohen JR, Buser Z, Brodke DS, Youssef JA, Park JB, Yoon ST, Wang JC, Meisel HJ. Trends Analysis of rhBMP Utilization in Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the United States. Global Spine J 2017; 7:624-628. [PMID: 28989840 PMCID: PMC5624372 DOI: 10.1177/2192568217699387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) has been widely used in spinal fusion surgery, but there is little information on rhBMP-2 utilization in single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the trends and demographics of rhBMP-2 utilization in single-level PLIF. METHODS Patients who underwent single-level PLIF from 2005 to 2011 were identified by searching ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes in the PearlDiver Patient Records Database, a national database of orthopedic insurance records. The year of procedure, age, gender, and region of the United States were recorded for each patient. Results were reported for each variable as the incidence of procedures identified per 100 000 patients searched in the database. RESULTS A total of 2735 patients had single-level PLIF. The average rate of single-level PLIF with rhBMP-2 maintained at a relatively stable level (28% to 31%) from 2005 to 2009, but decreased in 2010 (9.9%) and 2011 (11.8%). The overall incidence of single-level PLIF without rhBMP-2 (0.68 cases per 100 000 patients) was statistically higher (P < .01) compared to single-level PLIF with rhBMP-2 (0.21 cases per 100 000 patients). The average rate of single-level PLIF with rhBMP-2 utilization was the highest in West (30.1%), followed by Midwest (26.9%), South (20.5%), and Northeast (17.8%). The highest incidence of single-level PLIF with rhBMP-2 was observed in the age group <65 years (0.3 per 100 000 patients). CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first study to report on the demographics associated with rhBMP-2 use in single-level PLIF. There was a 3-fold increase in the rate of PLIF without rhBMP-2 compared to PLIF with rhBMP-2, with both procedures being mainly done in patients less than 65 years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lifeng Lao
- University of California at Los Angeles, CA, USA,Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Zorica Buser
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA,Zorica Buser, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Hoffman Medical Research Center, 2011 Zonal Ave, HMR 710, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
| | | | - Jim A. Youssef
- Durango Orthopedic Associates, P.C./Spine Colorado, Durango, CO, USA
| | - Jong-Beom Park
- Uijongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijongbu, Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Phan K, Ramachandran V, Tran T, Phan S, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ. Impact of Elderly Age on Complications and Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery. World Neurosurg 2017; 105:503-509. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2017] [Revised: 05/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
48
|
Rao PJ, Phan K, Giang G, Maharaj MM, Phan S, Mobbs RJ. Subsidence following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): a prospective study. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2017; 3:168-175. [PMID: 28744497 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2017.05.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a widely used surgical technique for disorders of the lumbar spine. One potential complication is the subsidence of disc height in the post-operative period. Few studies have reported the rate of subsidence in ALIF surgery prospectively. We prospectively evaluated the rate of subsidence in adult patients undergoing ALIF. METHODS Results were obtained by reviewing scans of 147 patients. Disc heights were measured on radiographic scans taken pre-operatively in addition to post-operatively immediately, at 6 weeks and at 18 months. The anterior and posterior intervertebral disc heights were measured. Subsidence was defined as greater than or equal to 2 mm loss of height. RESULTS A total of 15 patients (10.2%) had subsidence, with 7 being male. Each case was of delayed cage subsidence (DCS) >6 weeks postoperatively. The mean subsidence was 4.7 mm (range, 2.4-7.8). Mean anterior disc height was 8.6±0.4 mm preoperatively, which improved to 15.1±0.5 mm at latest follow-up. Mean posterior disc height was 4.7±0.2 mm preoperatively, which improved to 8.7±0.4 mm at latest follow-up. The mean lumbar lordosis (LL) angle was 42.5°±10.8° and the mean local disc angle (LDA) was 6.7°±4.0°. The 91.2% (n=114/125) of patients with appropriate radiological follow-up demonstrated fusion by latest follow-up. There was no correlation between subsidence rate with patient reported outcomes [Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form 12 Item survey (SF-12)] and fusion rates. There was a significant negative correlation between LL and extent of subsidence (Pearson correlation =-0.754, P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, we found that the subsidence rate at follow-up was generally low following standalone ALIF for this patient series. Patient clinical outcomes and bony fusion rates were not significantly influenced by subsidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashanth J Rao
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia
| | - Kevin Phan
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gloria Giang
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia
| | - Monish M Maharaj
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia
| | - Steven Phan
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ralph J Mobbs
- NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
[A continuous series of 27 adult patients treated for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis by combined approach: Clinical and radiological outcomes at 1 year follow-up]. Neurochirurgie 2017; 63:74-80. [PMID: 28511802 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2017.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 01/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Through this single-center consecutive prospective study, we evaluated the results of a combined approach for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis, using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody lordotic cage during anterior approach and pedicle screw-based posterior fixation. Between 2010 and 2014, 27 adult patients were treated for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis (high and low grades) by a combined approach with a minimum follow-up of one year. Clinical outcome was assessed before surgical treatment and at four months and one year after surgery by: VAS, Oswestry Index (ODI) and Rolland-Morris scores. Two observers evaluated the following radiological parameters: pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis L5-S1, anterior and posterior disc height, spinal vertical axis (SVA), SVA/sacro-femoral distance (SFD) ratio. Fusion was evaluated on the CT scan at one-year follow-up. Blood loss, surgery time and complications were also collected. The mean age was 47.7 years (±16.9). The VAS, ODI and Rolland-Morris scores were significantly improved postoperatively, decreased from 7.5 (±1.45); 48 (±19.25); 15.3 (±4.67) before the surgery to 3.8 (±2.55); 28.7 (±19.58) and 7.76 (±7.21) respectively at one year after the surgery (P=0.05). The mean follow-up was 3.3 years. Mean surgery time was 193.7min (±37). Fusion was obtained in 100% of cases. Segmental lordosis L5-S1, pelvic tilt, slippage, anterior and posterior L5-S1 disc height were significantly improved postoperatively, they passed from 20.1; 22.6; 35.3%; 26.4%; 17.9% to 29.5; 20.6; 20.3%; 64.4%; 36.3% respectively. Combined surgical procedure meets the required goals of surgery in the treatment of adults L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Collapse
|
50
|
Cyst-Like Osteolytic Formations in Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2) Augmented Sheep Spinal Fusion. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2017; 187:1485-1495. [PMID: 28502475 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Multiple case reports using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) have reported complications. However, the local adverse effects of rhBMP-2 application are not well documented. In this report we show that, in addition to promoting lumbar spinal fusion through potent osteogenic effects, rhBMP-2 augmentation promotes local cyst-like osteolytic formations in sheep trabecular bones that have undergone anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Three months after operation, conventional computed tomography showed that the trabecular bones of the rhBMP-2 application groups could fuse, whereas no fusion was observed in the control group. Micro-computed tomography analysis revealed that the core implant area's bone volume fraction and bone mineral density increased proportionately with rhBMP-2 dose. Multiple cyst-like bone voids were observed in peri-implant areas when using rhBMP-2 applications, and these sites showed significant bone mineral density decreases in relation to the unaffected regions. Biomechanically, these areas decreased in strength by 32% in comparison with noncystic areas. Histologically, rhBMP-2-affected void sites had an increased amount of fatty marrow, thinner trabecular bones, and significantly more adiponectin- and cathepsin K-positive cells. Despite promoting successful fusion, rhBMP-2 use in clinical applications may result in local adverse structural alterations and compromised biomechanical changes to the bone.
Collapse
|