1
|
Zavras AG, Vucicevic RS, Federico VP, Nolte MT, Shepard NA, Sayari AJ, Colman MW. Preoperative diagnosis of mental health disorder and dysphagia following anterior cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2024:1-6. [PMID: 38457793 DOI: 10.3171/2024.1.spine23774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mental health disorders (MHDs) have been linked to worse postoperative outcomes after various surgical procedures. Past studies have also demonstrated a higher prevalence of dysphagia in both acute and community mental health settings. Dysphagia is among the most common complications following anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS); however, current literature describing the association between an established diagnosis of an MHD and the rate of dysphagia after ACSS is sparse. METHODS All patients who underwent ACSS between 2014 and 2020 with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were retrospectively evaluated at a single institution. Patients were divided into cohorts depending on an established diagnosis of an MHD: the first had no established MHD (non-MHD); the second included patients with a diagnosed MHD. Outcomes were measured using pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores, which included the Swallowing Quality of Life survey for dysphagia, as well as physical and mental health questionnaires. Postoperative dysphagia surveys were obtained at final follow-up for both patient cohorts. RESULTS A total of 68 and 124 patients with and without a diagnosis of a MHD were assessed. The MHD group reported significantly worse baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System depression scale scores (p < 0.001), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (p < 0.001), and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (p = 0.001) mental health components compared to non-MHD group. This group continued to have worse mental health status in the postoperative period, as reported by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System depression scale scores (p = 0.024), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (p = 0.019), and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (p = 0.027). Postoperative assessment of Swallowing Quality of Life scores (expressed as the mean ± SD) also showed worse dysphagia outcomes in the MHD cohort (80.1 ± 12.2) than in the non-MHD cohort (86.0 ± 12.1, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS ACSS is associated with significantly higher postoperative dysphagia in patients diagnosed with an MHD when compared to patients without an established mental health diagnosis. Given the high prevalence of MHDs in patients with spinal pathology, it is important for spine surgeons to take note of the increased incidence of dysphagia faced by this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athan G Zavras
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Rajko S Vucicevic
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Vincent P Federico
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael T Nolte
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nicholas A Shepard
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arash J Sayari
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Matthew W Colman
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Albert HB, Sayari AJ, Barajas JN, Hornung AL, Harada G, Nolte MT, Chee AV, Samartzis D, Tkachev A. The impact of novel inflammation-preserving treatment towards lumbar disc herniation resorption in symptomatic patients: a prospective, multi-imaging and clinical outcomes study. Eur Spine J 2024; 33:964-973. [PMID: 38099946 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08064-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We performed a prospective one-year multi-imaging study to assess the clinical outcomes and rate of disc resorption in acute lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients undergoing inflammation-preserving treatment (i.e. no NSAIDS, steroids). METHODS All patients received gabapentin to relieve leg pain, 12 sessions of acupuncture. Repeat MRI was performed, every 3 months, after 12 sessions of treatment continued for those without 40% reduction in herniated disc sagittal area. Disc herniations sizes were measured on sagittal T2W MRI sequences, pre-treatment and at post-treatment intervals. Patients were stratified to fast, medium, slow, and prolonged recovery groups in relation to symptom resolution and disc resorption. RESULTS Ninety patients (51% females; mean age: 48.6 years) were assessed. Mean size of disc herniation was 119.54 ± 54.34 mm2, and the mean VAS-Leg score was 6.12 ± 1.13 at initial presentation. A total of 19 patients (21.1%) improved at the time of the repeat MRI (i.e. within first 3 months post-treatment). 100% of all patient had LDH resorption within one year (mean: 4.4. months). There was no significant difference at baseline LDH between fast, medium, slow, and prolonged resorption groups. Initial LDH size was weakly associated with degree of leg pain at baseline and initial gabapentin levels. Surgery was avoided in all cases. CONCLUSION This is the first study to note inflammation-preserving treatment, without conventional anti-inflammatory and steroid medications, as safe and effective for patients with an acute LDH. Rate of disc resorption (100%) was higher than comparative recent meta-analysis findings (66.7%) and no patient underwent surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne B Albert
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Orthopedic Building, 1611 W. Harrison St., 2nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Arash J Sayari
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Orthopedic Building, 1611 W. Harrison St., 2nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - J Nicolas Barajas
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Orthopedic Building, 1611 W. Harrison St., 2nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alexander L Hornung
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Orthopedic Building, 1611 W. Harrison St., 2nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Garrett Harada
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Orthopedic Building, 1611 W. Harrison St., 2nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Orthopedic Building, 1611 W. Harrison St., 2nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ana V Chee
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Orthopedic Building, 1611 W. Harrison St., 2nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Dino Samartzis
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Orthopedic Building, 1611 W. Harrison St., 2nd Floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zavras AG, Sullivan TB, Federico VP, Nolte MT, Munim MA, Phillips FM, Colman MW. Preoperative Multifidus Muscle Quality is Associated With Patient Reported Outcomes After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Global Spine J 2024; 14:647-656. [PMID: 35984823 PMCID: PMC10802536 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221120400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) commonly involves a transpsoas approach. Despite the association between LLIF, postoperative iliopsoas weakness, and iatrogenic neuropraxia, no study has yet examined the effect of psoas or multifidus muscle quality on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent LLIF with 1-year minimum follow-up. Psoas and multifidus muscle qualities were graded on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging using two validated classification systems for muscle atrophy. Average muscle quality was calculated as the mean score from all levels (L1-2 through L5-S1). Univariate and multivariate statistics were utilized to investigate the relationship between psoas/multifidus muscle quality and preoperative, 6-weeks postoperative, and final postoperative PROs. RESULTS 74 patients (110 levels) with a mean follow-up of 18.71 ± 8.02 months were included for analysis. Greater multifidus atrophy was associated with less improvement on ODI, SF12, and VR12 (P < .05) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, worse multifidus atrophy predicted less improvement on SF12 and VR12 (P < .05). CONCLUSION Despite the direct manipulation of the psoas muscle inherent to LLIF, preoperative psoas muscle quality did not affect postoperative outcomes. Rather, the extent of preoperative multifidus fatty infiltration and atrophy was more likely to predict postoperative pain and disability. These findings suggest that multifidus atrophy may be more pertinent than psoas atrophy in its association with patient-reported outcome measures after LLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athan G. Zavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - T. Barrett Sullivan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Vincent P. Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T. Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mohammed A. Munim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Frank M. Phillips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew W. Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zavras AG, Federico VP, Butler AJ, Nolte MT, Dandu N, Phillips FM, Colman MW. Relative Efficacy of Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty Devices and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Pathology: A Network Meta-Analysis. Global Spine J 2024; 14:322-346. [PMID: 37099726 PMCID: PMC10676167 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231172982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. OBJECTIVE This study sought to compare patient-reported outcomes, success, complications, and radiographic outcomes directly and indirectly between different cervical total disc arthroplasty (TDA) devices and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS Patients of prospective randomized controlled trials of 1-level cervical TDA with a minimum of 2 years follow up were identified in the literature. A frequentist network meta-analysis model was used to compare each outcome across the different TDA devices included and ACDF using the mixed effect sizes. RESULTS 15 studies were included for quantitative analysis, reporting the outcomes of 2643 patients with an average follow-up was 67.3 months (range: 24-120 months), 1417 of whom underwent TDA and 1226 of whom underwent ACDF. Nine TDA devices were compared to ACDF, including the Bryan, Discover, Kineflex, M6, Mobi-C, PCM, Prestige ST, ProDisc-C, and Secure-C cervical prostheses. Several devices outperformed ACDF for certain outcomes, including Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Arm, Physical Component Score of the Short-Form Health Survey (SF PCS), neurological success, satisfaction, index-level secondary surgical interventions (SSI), and adjacent level surgeries. Cumulative ranking of each intervention assessed demonstrated the highest performance with the M6 prosthesis (P = .70), followed by Secure-C (P = .67), PCM (P = .57), Prestige ST (P = .57), ProDisc-C (P = .54), Mobi-C (P = .53), Bryan (P = .49), Kineflex (P = .49), Discover (P = .39), and ACDF (P = .14). CONCLUSION Cervical TDA was found to be superior on most outcomes assessed in the literature of high-quality clinical trials. While most devices demonstrated similar outcomes, certain prostheses such as the M6 were found to outperform others across several outcomes assessed. These findings suggest that the restoration of near-normal cervical kinematics may lead to improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athan G. Zavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Vincent P. Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alexander J. Butler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T. Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Navya Dandu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Frank M. Phillips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew W. Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Munim MA, Nolte MT, Federico VP, Vucicevic RS, Butler AJ, Zavras AG, Walsh JM, Phillips FM, Colman MW. The Effect of Intraoperative Prone Position on Psoas Morphology and Great Vessel Anatomy: Consequences for Prone Lateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e578-e588. [PMID: 37898268 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study sought to quantify radiographic differences in psoas morphology, great vessel anatomy, and lumbar lordosis between supine and prone intraoperative positioning to optimize surgical planning and minimize the risk of neurovascular injury. METHODS Measurements on supine magnetic resonance imaging and prone intraoperative computed tomography with O-arm from L2 to L5 levels included the anteroposterior and mediolateral proximity of the psoas, aorta, inferior vena cava (IVC), and anterior iliac vessels to the vertebral body. Psoas transverse and longitudinal diameters, psoas cross-sectional area, total lumbar lordosis, and segmental lordosis were assessed. RESULTS Prone position produced significant psoas lateralization, especially at more caudal levels (P < 0.001). The psoas drifted slightly anteriorly when prone, which was non-significant, but the magnitude of anterior translation significantly decreased at more caudal segments (P = 0.038) and was lowest at L5 where in fact posterior retraction was observed (P = 0.032). When prone, the IVC (P < 0.001) and right iliac vein (P = 0.005) migrated significantly anteriorly, however decreased anterior displacement was seen at more caudal levels (P < 0.001). Additionally, the IVC drifted significantly laterally at L5 (P = 0.009). Mean segmental lordosis significantly increased when prone (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Relative to the vertebral body, the psoas demonstrated substantial lateral mobility when prone, and posterior retraction specifically at L5. IVC and right iliac vein experienced significant anterior mobility-particularly at more cephalad levels. Prone position enhanced segmental lordosis and may be critical to optimizing sagittal restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed A Munim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Vincent P Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rajko S Vucicevic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Alexander J Butler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Athan G Zavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Justin M Walsh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Frank M Phillips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Matthew W Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zavras AG, Federico V, Nolte MT, Butler AJ, Dandu N, Munim M, Harper DE, Lopez GD, DeWald CJ, An HS, Singh K, Phillips FM, Colman MW. Risk Factors for Subsidence Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Global Spine J 2024; 14:257-264. [PMID: 35593712 PMCID: PMC10676155 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221103588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) may be complicated by subsidence, which can lead to significant morbidity including pain, disc space collapse, neural compression, segmental kyphosis, instability, and vertebral body fracture. This study sought to identify patient and procedural risk factors for subsidence in patients undergoing ALIF. METHODS This study analyzed consecutive patients who underwent ALIF at a single institution with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patients were grouped as either Non-Subsidence (NS-ALIF) or Cage Subsidence (CS-ALIF) based on the final postoperative radiograph. Demographic variables, operative characteristics, and radiographic outcomes were evaluated to identify significant predictors on univariate and multivariate statistics. RESULTS 144 patients (170 levels) were included with an average follow-up of 50.70 ± 28.44 months (4.23 years). The incidence of subsidence was 22.94% (39/170 levels). On univariate statistics, the CS-ALIF group was significantly older (P = .020), had higher BMI (P = .048), worse ASA (P = .001), higher prevalence of comorbid osteoporosis (P < .001), and a more anteriorly placed interbody device (P = .005). On multivariate analysis, anterior cage placement remained the only significant predictor (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14; P = .003). There was a significantly higher rate of subsequent adjacent segment surgery among the CS-ALIF group (P = .035). CONCLUSION Factors contributing to subsidence in ALIF included older age, higher BMI, severe ASA, and osteoporosis, while anterior cage placement remained the only independent predictor on multivariate analysis. Subsidence was associated with a higher rate of subsequent adjacent segment surgery. Surgical technique should optimize placement of the interbody cage and avoid overstuffing the disc space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athan G. Zavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Vincent Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T. Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alexander J. Butler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Navya Dandu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mohammed Munim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniel E. Harper
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gregory D. Lopez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Howard S. An
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Frank M. Phillips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew W. Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Federico VP, Zavras AG, Nie JW, Butler AJ, Munim MA, Nolte MT, Lopez GD, An HS, Colman MW, Phillips FM. Does disc distraction after cervical total disc arthroplasty impact range of motion and patient-reported outcomes? J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 39:335-344. [PMID: 37310033 DOI: 10.3171/2023.5.spine23160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Total disc arthroplasty (TDA) has been established as a safe and effective alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spine pathology. However, there remains a paucity of studies in the literature regarding the amount of disc height distraction that can be tolerated, as well as its impact on kinematic and clinical outcomes. METHODS Patients who underwent 1- or 2-level cervical TDA with a minimum follow-up of 1 year with lateral flexion/extension and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were included. Middle disc space height was measured on preoperative and 6-week postoperative lateral radiographs to quantify the magnitude of disc space distraction, and patients were grouped into < 2-mm distraction and > 2-mm distraction groups. Radiographic outcomes included operative segment lordosis, segmental range of motion (ROM) on flexion/extension, cervical (C2-7) ROM on flexion/extension, and heterotopic ossification (HO). General health and disease-specific PROMs were compared at the preoperative, 6-week, and final postoperative time points. The independent-samples t-test and chi-square test were used to compare outcomes between groups, while multivariate linear regression was used to adjust for baseline differences. RESULTS Fifty patients who underwent cervical TDA at 59 levels were included in the analysis. Distraction < 2 mm was seen at 30 levels (50.85%), while distraction > 2 mm was observed at 29 levels (49.15%). Radiographically, after adjustment for baseline differences, C2-7 ROM was significantly greater in the patients who underwent TDA with < 2-mm disc space distraction at final follow-up (51.35° ± 13.76° vs 39.19° ± 10.52°, p = 0.002), with a trend toward significance in the early postoperative period. There were no significant postoperative differences in segmental lordosis, segmental ROM, or HO grades. After the authors controlled for baseline differences, < 2-mm distraction of the disc space led to significantly greater improvement in visual analog scale (VAS)-neck scores at 6 weeks (-3.68 ± 3.12 vs -2.24 ± 2.70, p = 0.031) and final follow-up (-4.59 ± 2.74 vs -1.70 ± 3.03, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Patients with < 2-mm disc height difference had increased C2-7 ROM at final follow-up and significantly greater improvement in neck pain after controlling for baseline differences. Limiting differences in disc space height to < 2 mm affected C2-7 ROM but not segmental ROM, suggesting that less distraction may result in more harmonious kinematics between all cervical levels.
Collapse
|
8
|
Federico VP, Zavras AG, Butler A, Nolte MT, Munim MA, Lopez GD, DeWald C, An HS, Colman MW, Phillips FM. Medicare Reimbursement Rates and Utilization Trends in Sacroiliac Joint Fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:923-930. [PMID: 37192412 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-00800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion is a surgical treatment option for SIJ pathology in select patients who have failed conservative management. More recently, minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have been developed. This study aimed to determine the trends in procedure volume and reimbursement rates for SIJ fusion. METHODS Publicly available Medicare databases were assessed using the National Summary Data Files for 2010 to 2020. Files were organized according to current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. CPT codes specific to open and MIS SI joint fusion (27279 and 27280) were identified and tracked. To track surgeon reimbursements, the CMS Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool was used to extract facility prices. Descriptive statistics and linear regression were used to evaluate trends in procedure volume, utilization, and reimbursement rates. Compound annual growth rates were calculated, and discrepancies in inflation were corrected for using the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS A total of 33,963 SIJ fusions were conducted in the Medicare population between 2010 and 2020, with an overall increase in procedure volume of 2,350.9% from 318 cases in 2010 to 7,794 in 2020. Since the introduction of the 27279 CPT code in 2015, 8,806 cases (31.5%) have been open and 19,120 (68.5%) have been MIS. Surgeon reimbursement for open fusions increased nominally by 42.8% (inflation-adjusted increase of 20%) from $998 in 2010 to $1,425 in 2020. Meanwhile, reimbursement for MIS fusion experienced a nominal increase of 58.4% (inflation-adjusted increase of 44.9%) from $582 in 2015 to $922 in 2020. CONCLUSION SIJ fusion volume in the Medicare population has increased substantially in the past 10 years, with MIS SIJ fusion accounting for most of the procedures since the introduction of the 27279 CPT code in 2015. Reimbursement rates for surgeons have also increased for both open and MIS procedures, even after adjusting for inflation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Federico
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nguyen AQ, Harvey JP, Federico VP, Nolte MT, Khanna K, Gandhi SD, Sheha ED, Colman MW, Phillips FM. The Effect of Changes in Segmental Lordosis on Global Lumbar and Adjacent Segment Lordosis After L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231195777. [PMID: 37565994 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231195777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE Restoration of lordosis in lumbar fusion reduces low back pain, decreases adjacent segment degeneration, and improves postoperative outcomes. However, the potential effects of changes in segmental lordosis on adjacent-level and global lordosis remain less understood. This study aims to examine the relationships between segmental (SL), adjacent-level, and global lumbar lordosis following L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF). METHODS 80 consecutive patients who underwent single-level L5-S1 ALIF were divided into 3 groups based on the degree of change (∆) in index-level segmental lordosis: <5° (n = 23), 5°-10° (n = 29), >10° (n = 28). Radiographic parameters measured included global lumbar, segmental, and adjacent level lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and PI-LL mismatch. RESULTS Patients with ∆SL 5°-10° or ∆SL >10° both showed significant increases in global lumbar lordosis from preoperative to final follow-up. However, patients with ∆SL >10° showed statistically significant losses in adjacent level lordosis at both immediate postoperative and final follow-up compared to preoperative. When comparing patients with ∆SL >10° to those with ∆SL 5-10°, there were no significant differences in global lumbar lordosis at final follow-up, due to significantly greater losses of adjacent level lordosis in these patients. CONCLUSION The degree of compensatory loss of lordosis at the adjacent level L4-L5 correlated with the extent of segmental lordosis creation at the index L5-S1 level. This may suggest that the L4 to S1 segment acts as a "harmonious unit," able to accommodate only a certain amount of lordosis and further increases in segmental lordosis may be mitigated by loss of adjacent-level lordosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Q Nguyen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jackson P Harvey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Vincent P Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Sapan D Gandhi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew W Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Frank M Phillips
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Munim MA, Berlinberg E, Federico VP, Nolte MT, Prabhu M, Pawlowski H, Patel KS, Colman MW. Usage Trends and Safety Profile of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Spinal Column Tumor Surgery: A National Matched Cohort Analysis. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231194248. [PMID: 37542521 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231194248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Cohort Analysis. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to investigate national rates of rhBMP-2 utilization in spinal tumor surgery and examine its association with postoperative complications, revisions, and carcinogenicity. METHODS All patients diagnosed with primary or metastatic spinal tumors with subsequent surgical intervention involving a spinal fusion procedure were identified in PearlDiver. Patients were 1:1 matched into 2 cohorts according to rhBMP-2 usage. Postoperative complications and revisions were examined at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after fusion. New cancer incidence following spinal tumor surgery was assessed until 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 11,198 patients underwent fusion surgery after resection of spinal tumors between 2005 and 2020, with 909 cases reporting the use of rhBMP-2 (8.1%). An annualized analysis revealed that the proportion of spine tumor fusion procedures utilizing rhBMP-2 has been significantly decreasing (R2 = .859, P < .001), with the most recent annual utilization rate at 1.1%. At least 3 months after surgery, significantly increased incidences of surgical site (11.4% vs 3.3%, P = .03) and systemic infections (8.1% vs 1.6%, P = .02) were observed in patients who underwent fusion with rhBMP-2. Across all time points, no significant differences were observed in survival, implant removal, revision rates, or new cancer diagnoses. CONCLUSION This analysis demonstrated significantly declining national utilization rates. Spinal tumor cases utilizing rhBMP-2 sustained greater rates of surgical site and systemic infections. rhBMP-2 usage did not significantly reduce the risk of mortality, implant failure, or reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed A Munim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Elyse Berlinberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Vincent P Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael Prabhu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hanna Pawlowski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karan S Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew W Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nguyen AQ, Ukogu C, Harvey JP, Federico VP, Nolte MT, Khanna K, Sheha ED, Gandhi SD, Phillips FM. Increased cage angle effects on radiographic outcomes after stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2023:1-9. [PMID: 37148223 DOI: 10.3171/2023.4.spine221283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a well-accepted surgical technique used to treat various lumbar degenerative pathologies. Recently, hyperlordotic cages have been introduced to create higher degrees of lordosis to the lumbar spine. There are little data currently available to define the radiographic benefits that these cages provide with stand-alone ALIF. The goal of the present study was to assess the effect of increasing cage angles on postoperative subsidence, sagittal alignment, and foraminal and disc height in patients who underwent single-level stand-alone ALIF surgery. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed of consecutive patients who underwent single-level ALIF by a single spine surgeon. Radiographic analysis included global lordosis, operative level of segmental lordosis, cage subsidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, edge loading, foraminal height, posterior disc height, anterior disc height, and adjacent-level lordosis. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were performed to analyze the relationship between cage angle and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS Seventy-two patients were included in the study and divided into three groups based on cage angle: < 10° (n = 17), 10°-15° (n = 36), and > 15° (n = 19). Within the entire study cohort, there were significant improvements in disc and foraminal height, as well as segmental and global lordosis, at the final follow-up after single-level ALIF. However, when stratified by cage angle groups, patients with > 15° cages did not have any additional significant changes in global or segmental lordosis compared with those patients with smaller cage angles, but patients with > 15° cages showed greater risk of subsidence while also having significantly less improvements in foraminal height, posterior disc height, and average disc height compared with the other groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients with < 15° stand-alone ALIF cages showed improved average foraminal and disc (posterior, anterior, and average) height without sacrificing improvements in sagittal parameters or increasing risk of subsidence when compared to patients with hyperlordotic cages. The use of hyperlordotic cages > 15° did not provide spinal lordosis commensurate with the lordotic angle of the cage and had a greater risk of subsidence. Although this study was limited by a lack of patient-reported outcomes to correlate with radiographic results, these findings support the judicious use of hyperlordotic cages in stand-alone ALIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Q Nguyen
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Chierika Ukogu
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jackson P Harvey
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Vincent P Federico
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael T Nolte
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Krishn Khanna
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
- 3Orthopaedics Northeast P.C., Andover, Massachusetts; and
| | - Evan D Sheha
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Sapan D Gandhi
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Frank M Phillips
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rudisill SS, Saleh NZ, Hornung AL, Zbeidi S, Ali RM, Siyaji ZK, Ahn J, Nolte MT, Lopez GD, Sayari AJ. YouTube as a source of information on pediatric scoliosis: a reliability and educational quality analysis. Spine Deform 2023; 11:3-9. [PMID: 35986883 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00569-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the reliability and educational quality of YouTube videos related to pediatric scoliosis. METHODS In December 2020, searches of "pediatric scoliosis", "idiopathic scoliosis", "scoliosis in children", and "curved spine in children" were conducted using YouTube. The first 50 results of each search were analyzed according to upload source and content. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria were used to assess reliability (score 0-4), and educational quality was evaluated using the Global Quality Score (GQS; score 0-5) and Pediatric Scoliosis-Specific Score (PSS; score 0-15). Differences in scores based on upload source and content were determined by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariate linear regressions identified any independent predictors of reliability and educational quality. RESULTS After eliminating duplicates, 153 videos were analyzed. Videos were viewed 28.5 million times in total, averaging 186,160.3 ± 1,012,485.0 views per video. Physicians (54.2%) and medical sources (19.0%) were the most common upload sources, and content was primarily categorized as disease-specific (50.0%) and patient experience (25.5%). Videos uploaded by patients achieved significantly lower JAMA scores (p = 0.004). Conversely, academic or physician-uploaded videos scored higher on PSS (p = 0.003) and demonstrated a trend towards improved GQS (p = 0.051). Multivariate analysis determined longer video duration predicted higher scores on all measures. However, there were no independent associations between upload source or content and assessment scores. CONCLUSION YouTube contains a large repository of videos concerning pediatric scoliosis; however, the reliability and educational quality of these videos were low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel S Rudisill
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Nour Z Saleh
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Alexander L Hornung
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Shadi Zbeidi
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Roohi M Ali
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Zakariah K Siyaji
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Junyoung Ahn
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Gregory D Lopez
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Arash J Sayari
- Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Martin CT, Holton KJ, Elder BD, Fogelson JL, Mikula AL, Kleck CJ, Calabrese D, Burger EL, Ou-Yang D, Patel VV, Kim HJ, Lovecchio F, Hu SS, Wood KB, Harper R, Yoon ST, Ananthakrishnan D, Michael KW, Schell AJ, Lieberman IH, Kisinde S, DeWald CJ, Nolte MT, Colman MW, Phillips FM, Gelb DE, Bruckner J, Ross LB, Johnson JP, Kim TT, Anand N, Cheng JS, Plummer Z, Park P, Oppenlander ME, Sembrano JN, Jones KE, Polly DW. Catastrophic acute failure of pelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity requiring revision surgery: a multicenter review of incidence, failure mechanisms, and risk factors. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 38:98-106. [PMID: 36057123 DOI: 10.3171/2022.6.spine211559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There are few prior reports of acute pelvic instrumentation failure in spinal deformity surgery. The objective of this study was to determine if a previously identified mechanism and rate of pelvic fixation failure were present across multiple institutions, and to determine risk factors for these types of failures. METHODS Thirteen academic medical centers performed a retrospective review of 18 months of consecutive adult spinal fusions extending 3 or more levels, which included new pelvic screws at the time of surgery. Acute pelvic fixation failure was defined as occurring within 6 months of the index surgery and requiring surgical revision. RESULTS Failure occurred in 37 (5%) of 779 cases and consisted of either slippage of the rods or displacement of the set screws from the screw tulip head (17 cases), screw shaft fracture (9 cases), screw loosening (9 cases), and/or resultant kyphotic fracture of the sacrum (6 cases). Revision strategies involved new pelvic fixation and/or multiple rod constructs. Six patients (16%) who underwent revision with fewer than 4 rods to the pelvis sustained a second acute failure, but no secondary failures occurred when at least 4 rods were used. In the univariate analysis, the magnitude of surgical correction was higher in the failure cohort (higher preoperative T1-pelvic angle [T1PA], presence of a 3-column osteotomy; p < 0.05). Uncorrected postoperative deformity increased failure risk (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch > 10°, higher postoperative T1PA; p < 0.05). Use of pelvic screws less than 8.5 mm in diameter also increased the likelihood of failure (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, a larger preoperative global deformity as measured by T1PA was associated with failure, male patients were more likely to experience failure than female patients, and there was a strong association with implant manufacturer (p < 0.05). Anterior column support with an L5-S1 interbody fusion was protective against failure (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Acute catastrophic failures involved large-magnitude surgical corrections and likely resulted from high mechanical strain on the pelvic instrumentation. Patients with large corrections may benefit from anterior structural support placed at the most caudal motion segment and multiple rods connecting to more than 2 pelvic fixation points. If failure occurs, salvage with a minimum of 4 rods and 4 pelvic fixation points can be successful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kenneth J Holton
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Benjamin D Elder
- 2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jeremy L Fogelson
- 2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Anthony L Mikula
- 2Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Christopher J Kleck
- 3Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David Calabrese
- 3Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Evalina L Burger
- 3Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David Ou-Yang
- 3Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Vikas V Patel
- 3Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Francis Lovecchio
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Serena S Hu
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Kirkham B Wood
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Robert Harper
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - S Tim Yoon
- 6Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Keith W Michael
- 6Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Adam J Schell
- 6Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Stanley Kisinde
- 7Scoliosis and Spine Tumor Center, Texas Back Institute, Plano, Texas
| | - Christopher J DeWald
- 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael T Nolte
- 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Matthew W Colman
- 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Frank M Phillips
- 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Daniel E Gelb
- 9Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jacob Bruckner
- 9Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lindsey B Ross
- 10Department of Neurologic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | - J Patrick Johnson
- 10Department of Neurologic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | - Terrence T Kim
- 11Department of Orthopaedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Neel Anand
- 11Department of Orthopaedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Joseph S Cheng
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; and
| | - Zach Plummer
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; and
| | - Paul Park
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Mark E Oppenlander
- 13Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Kristen E Jones
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - David W Polly
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lynch CP, Cha EDK, Jenkins NW, Parrish JM, Nolte MT, Geoghegan CE, Jadczak CN, Mohan S, Singh K. Influence of Preoperative Depressive Burden on Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Lumbar Decompression. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35:E693-E697. [PMID: 35509017 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE This study evaluates the association of preoperative mental health with the rate of achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcomes following lumbar decompression (LD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Research is scarce regarding the influence of preoperative depression on the rate of achieving MCID for mental health, physical function, and pain among LD patients. METHODS A surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for primary LD surgeries. Patients were grouped by depressive symptom severity according to the preoperative Patient Health Questionnaire 9 score. The association of Patient Health Questionnaire 9 subgroups with demographic and surgical variables was analyzed, and differences among subgroups were assessed. Achievement rates of MCID for physical function, pain, disability, and mental health were compared among groups at each time point using previously established MCID thresholds. RESULTS Of the 321 subjects, 69.8% were male, and 170 subjects had minimal preoperative depressive symptoms, 86 had moderate, and 65 had severe. Patients in moderate and severe groups demonstrated a significantly greater rate of MCID achievement for disability at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. The severe group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of achieving MCID for mental health at the 1-year time point. CONCLUSIONS Patients with any range of preoperative depressive symptom severity had a similar rate of achieving MCID for pain and physical function throughout 1 year following LD. The severe depressive symptom group had a higher rate of MCID achievement with disability at 6 weeks and with mental health at 1 year. This study demonstrates that patients with any preoperative depressive symptom severity have an indistinguishable ability to attain MCID by 1 year following LD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor P Lynch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Singh K, Cha EDK, Lynch CP, Nolte MT, Parrish JM, Jenkins NW, Jacob KC, Patel MR, Vanjani NN, Pawlowski H, Prabhu MC, Myers JA. Risk Assessment of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Access in Degenerative Spinal Conditions. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35:E601-E609. [PMID: 35344514 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE Develop an evidence-based preoperative risk assessment scoring system for patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA ALIF may hold advantages over other fusion techniques in sagittal restoration and fusion rates, though it introduces unique risks to vascular and abdominal structures and thus possibly increased risk of operative morbidity. METHODS Primary, 1 or 2-level ALIFs were identified in a surgical registry. Baseline characteristics were recorded. Axial magnetic resonance imagings at L4-L5 and L5-S1 were reviewed for vascular confluence/bifurcation or anomalous structures, and measured for operative window size/slope. To assess favorable outcomes, a clinical grade was calculated: (clinical grade=blood loss×operative duration), higher value indicating poorer outcome. To establish a risk scoring system, a base risk score algorithm was established and stratified into 5 categories: high, high to intermediate, intermediate, intermediate to low, and low. Modifiers to base risk score included age, body mass index, operative level, history of bone morphogenic protein use, calcified vasculature, spondylolisthesis grade, working window size and slope, and abnormal vasculature. Modifiers were weighted for contribution to surgical risk. A total risk score was calculated and evaluated for strength of association with clinical outcome grades by Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS A total of 65 patients were included. Mean clinical outcome grade was 5.6, mean total risk score 21.3±21.5. Multilevel procedures (L4-S1) mean total risk score was 57.3±7.8. L4-L5 mean total risk score was 23.6±5.2; L5-S1 mean total risk score 8.3±6.6. Correlation analysis demonstrated a significant and strong relationship (| r |=0.753; P <0.001) between total risk scores and clinical outcome grades. CONCLUSION Calculated ALIF risk scores significantly correlated with operative duration and blood loss. This scoring system represents a potential framework to facilitate clinical decision-making and risk assessment for potential ALIF candidates with degenerative spinal pathologies.
Collapse
|
16
|
Nolte MT, Parrish JM, Jenkins NW, Cha EDK, Lynch CP, Jadczak CN, Mohan S, Geoghegan CE, Hrynewycz NM, Singh K. Validation of Veterans RAND 12-Item Physical Function Survey in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Int J Spine Surg 2022; 16:8308. [PMID: 35728833 PMCID: PMC9421278 DOI: 10.14444/8308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Veterans RAND 12-item (VR-12) physical component score (PCS) has been validated in both veteran and US citizen populations; however, its use for spine surgery populations has not been evaluated. This study aims to correlate the VR-12 PCS survey with legacy patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). METHODS A prospective surgical database was retrospectively assessed for MIS TLIFs performed at 1 level from March 2015 to June 2019. Inclusion criteria were elective procedures for degenerative spinal pathology. Patients were excluded if they had surgery for metastatic, traumatic, or infectious etiologies or had incomplete preoperative 12-item Short Form (SF-12) PCS or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF) survey. Additionally, patients with any incomplete VR-12 PCS surveys through 1 year were excluded. Demographics and perioperative characteristics were recorded. Mean postoperative PROM scores and score difference from preoperative baseline were calculated at each postoperative timepoint through 1 year. The relationship of VR-12-PCS with SF-12-PCS and PROMIS PF was evaluated with a Pearson's correlation coefficient and time-independent partial correlation. RESULTS A total of 59 patients underwent single-level MIS TLIFs. The cohort was 44.1% women with an average age of 53.8 years, and 52.5% were obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2). The VR-12 PCS, SF-12 PCS, and PROMIS PF surveys had significant improvements from baseline to the 6 month through 1 year postoperative timepoints (P ≤ 0.001, all). All timepoints revealed strong VR-12-PCS correlations with SF-12-PCS and PROMIS PF (all P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION VR-12 PCS, SF-12 PCS, and PROMIS PF scores all indicate statistically significant improvements in physical function for patients following MIS TLIF. VR-12 PCS was strongly correlated with the historically validated SF-12 PCS system as well as with the more recent PROMIS PF survey. Our observations give weight to utilizing the VR-12 PCS survey as a valid measure of physical function among patients undergoing MIS TLIF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study validates VR-12 PCS to measure physical function for TLIF patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - James M Parrish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nathaniel W Jenkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Elliot D K Cha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Conor P Lynch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Caroline N Jadczak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Shruthi Mohan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cara E Geoghegan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nadia M Hrynewycz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zavras AG, Nolte MT, Sayari AJ, Singh K, Colman MW. Stand-Alone Cage Versus Anterior Plating for 1-Level and 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35:155-165. [PMID: 35394961 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective, randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE The aim was to compare perioperative and radiographic outcomes between stand-alone and anterior plated 1 and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA ACDF with interbody spacer and separate plate/screw construct (PLATE) may be associated with a higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia, increased operative time, and other complications. Therefore, some have opted to utilize an interbody cage with integrated screws and no plate (CAGE) with good results. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with 1-level to 2-level degenerative disease were prospectively enrolled and randomized into 1 of 2 treatment arms consisting of either PLATE or CAGE reconstruction. Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Primary endpoints included improvement on patient-reported outcome metrics, construct integrity, cervical alignment, successful arthrodesis, and subsequent revision surgeries. RESULTS Forty-six patients were included: 12 with 1-level PLATE, 12 with 1-level CAGE, 12 with 2-level PLATE, and 10 with 2-level CAGE. For 1-level ACDF, PLATE patients reported worse swallow function on Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire at 6 weeks (P=0.050) and 6 months (P=0.042). Pseudarthrosis requiring revision was observed in one PLATE patient. For 2-level ACDF CAGE patients reported worse disability on neck disability index (P=0.037) at 6 weeks, as well as worse neck disability index (P=0.017) and visual analog scale neck (P=0.010) at 6 months. However, PLATE patients reported worse swallow function on Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire at 6 weeks (P=0.038). There were no differences in the rates of fusion, loss of disc height correction, subsidence, or in sagittal parameters between cohorts for both 1-level and 2-level ACDF. CONCLUSION There was greater incidence of transient postoperative dysphagia in both single and 2-level PLATE cohorts. However, early postoperative outcomes were worse for 2-level CAGE in certain patient-reported metrics. This suggests that although anterior instrumentation may be associated with a higher likelihood of dysphagia, it may also lead to higher short-term stability and improved patient-reported outcomes for 2-level fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athan G Zavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zavras AG, Dandu N, Nolte MT, Butler AJ, Federico VP, Sayari AJ, Sullivan TB, Colman MW. Segmental range of motion after cervical total disc arthroplasty at long-term follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:1-9. [PMID: 35453108 DOI: 10.3171/2022.2.spine2281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As an alternative procedure to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, total disc arthroplasty (TDA) facilitates direct neural decompression and disc height restoration while also preserving cervical spine kinematics. To date, few studies have reported long-term functional outcomes after TDA. This paper reports the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis that investigated how segmental range of motion (ROM) at the operative level is maintained with long-term follow-up. METHODS PubMed and MEDLINE were queried for all published studies pertaining to cervical TDA. The methodology for screening adhered strictly to the PRISMA guidelines. All English-language prospective studies that reported ROM preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and/or at long-term follow-up of 5 years or more were included. A meta-analysis was performed using Cochran's Q and I2 to test data for statistical heterogeneity, in which case a random-effects model was used. The mean differences (MDs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. RESULTS Of the 12 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 8 reported the long-term outcomes of 944 patients with an average (range) follow-up of 99.86 (60-142) months and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference between preoperative segmental ROM and segmental ROM at 1-year follow-up (MD 0.91°, 95% CI -1.25° to 3.07°, p = 0.410). After the exclusion of 1 study from the comparison between preoperative and 1-year ROM owing to significant statistical heterogeneity according to the sensitivity analysis, ROM significantly improved at 1 year postoperatively (MD 1.92°, 95% CI 1.04°-2.79°, p < 0.001). However, at longer-term follow-up, the authors again found no difference with preoperative segmental ROM, and no study was excluded on the basis of the results of further sensitivity analysis (MD -0.22°, 95% CI -1.69° to -1.23°, p = 0.760). In contrast, there was a significant decrease in ROM from 1 year postoperatively to final long-term follow-up (MD -0.77°, 95% CI -1.29° to -0.24°, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Segmental ROM was found to initially improve beyond preoperative values for as long as 1 year postoperatively, but then ROM deteriorated back to values consistent with preoperative motion at long-term follow-up. Although additional studies with further longitudinal follow-up are needed, these findings further support the notion that cervical TDA may successfully maintain physiological spinal kinematics over the long term.
Collapse
|
19
|
Colman MW, Zavras AG, Federico VP, Nolte MT, Butler AJ, Singh K, Phillips FM. Longitudinal assessment of segmental motion of the cervical spine following total disc arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of devices. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:1-7. [PMID: 35426820 DOI: 10.3171/2022.2.spine22143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Total disc arthroplasty (TDA) has been shown to be an effective and safe treatment for cervical degenerative disc disease at short- and midterm follow-up. However, there remains a paucity of literature reporting the differences between individual prosthesis designs with regard to device performance. In this study, the authors evaluated the long-term maintenance of segmental range of motion (ROM) at the operative cervical level across a diverse range of TDA devices. METHODS In this study, the authors retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent 1- or 2-level cervical TDA between 2005 and 2020 at a single institution. Patients with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up and lateral flexion/extension radiographs preoperatively, 2 months postoperatively, and at final follow-up were included. Radiographic measurements included static segmental lordosis, segmental range of motion (ROM) on flexion/extension, global cervical (C2-7) ROM on flexion/extension, and disc space height. The paired t-test was used to evaluate improvement in radiographic parameters. Subanalysis between devices was performed using one-way ANCOVA. Significance was determined at p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 85 patients (100 discs) were included, with a mean patient age of 46.01 ± 8.82 years and follow-up of 43.56 ± 39.36 months. Implantations included 22 (22.00%) M6-C, 51 (51.00%) Mobi-C, 14 (14.00%) PCM, and 13 (13.00%) ProDisc-C devices. There were no differences in baseline radiographic parameters between groups. At 2 months postoperatively, PCM provided significantly less segmental lordosis (p = 0.037) and segmental ROM (p = 0.039). At final follow-up, segmental ROM with both the PCM and ProDisc-C devices was significantly less than that with the M6-C and Mobi-C devices (p = 0.015). From preoperatively to 2 months postoperatively, PCM implantation led to a significant loss of lordosis (p < 0.001) and segmental ROM (p = 0.005) relative to the other devices. Moreover, a significantly greater decline in segmental ROM from 2 months postoperatively to final follow-up was seen with ProDisc-C, while segmental ROM increased significantly over time with Mobi-C (p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS Analysis by TDA device brand demonstrated that motion preservation differs depending on disc design. Certain devices, including M6-C and Mobi-C, improve ROM on flexion/extension from preoperatively to postoperatively and continue to increase slightly at final follow-up. On the other hand, devices such as PCM and ProDisc-C contributed to greater segmental stiffness, with a gradual decline in ROM seen with ProDisc-C. Further studies are needed to understand how much segmental ROM is ideal after TDA for preservation of physiological cervical kinematics.
Collapse
|
20
|
Nolte MT, Harada GK, LeDuc R, Sayari AJ, Basques BA, Louie PK, Colman MW, Goldberg EJ, DeWald CJ, Phillips FM, Kogan M, An HS, Samartzis D. Pediatric Back Pain: A Scoring System to Guide Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Pediatr Orthop 2022; 42:116-122. [PMID: 34995265 DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000002026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of back pain in the pediatric population is increasing, and the workup of these patients presents a clinical challenge. Many cases are selflimited, but failure to diagnose a pathology that requires clinical intervention can carry severe repercussions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) carries a high cost to the patient and health care system, and may even require procedural sedation in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system based on pediatric patient factors to help determine when an MRI will change clinical management. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive pediatric patients who presented to clinic with a chief complaint of back pain between 2010 and 2018 at single orthopaedic surgery practice. Comprehensive demographic and presentation variables were collected. A predictive model of factors that influence whether MRI results in a change in management was then generated using cross-validation least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 729 patients were included, with a mean age of 15.1 years (range: 3 to 20 y). Of these, 344 (47.2%) had an MRI. A predictive model was generated, with nocturnal symptoms (5 points), neurological deficit (10 points), age (0.7 points per year), lumbar pain (2 points), sudden onset of pain (3.25 points), and leg pain (3.75 points) identified as significant predictors. A combined score of greater than 9.5 points for a given patient is highly suggestive that an MRI will result in a change in clinical management (specificity: 0.93; positive predictive value: 0.92). CONCLUSIONS A predictive model was generated to help determine when ordering an MRI may result in a change in clinical management for workup of back pain in the pediatric population. The main factors included the presence of a neurological deficit, nocturnal symptoms, sudden onset, leg pain, lumbar pain, and age. Care providers can use these findings to better determine if and when an MRI might be appropriate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III-diagnostic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Nolte
- International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
MacLean IS, Lu Y, Patel BH, Agarwalla A, Nolte MT, Lavoie-Gagne O, Romeo AA, Forsythe B. A Risk Stratification Nomogram to Predict Inpatient Admissions After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Among Patients Eligible for Medicare. Orthopedics 2022; 45:43-49. [PMID: 34734779 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20211101-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The goal of this study was to establish a risk stratification nomogram to aid in determining the need for inpatient admission among patients who were eligible for Medicare and were undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify all patients older than 65 years who underwent primary TSA between 2006 and 2016. The primary outcome measure was inpatient admission, as defined by hospital length of stay longer than 2 days. Multiple demographic, comorbid, and peri-operative variables were used in a multivariate logistic regression model to yield a risk stratification nomogram. A total of 1514 inpatient and 6020 out-patient admissions were analyzed. Age older than 80 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.69; P<.0001; 95% CI, 2.21-3.27), female sex (OR, 2.18; P<.0001; 95% CI, 1.90-2.51), dependent functional status (OR, 1.69; P<.0001; 95% CI, 1.2-2.38), dialysis (OR, 3.48; P=.029; 95% CI, 1.14-10.63), admission from an inpatient facility (OR, 1.76; P<.0001; 95% CI, 1.70-1.82), and inflammatory arthritis (OR, 1.69; P<.02; 95% CI, 1.25-13.78) were the greatest determinants of inpatient stay. The resulting predictive model showed acceptable discrimination and calibration. Our model enabled reliable and straightforward identification of the most suitable candidates for inpatient admission among patients who were eligible for Medicare and were undergoing primary TSA. Patients who were receiving dialysis, who had dyspnea at rest, and who had bleeding disorders were more likely to be admitted as inpatients after TSA. Larger multicenter studies are necessary to externally validate the proposed predictive nomogram. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(1):43-49.].
Collapse
|
22
|
Nolte MT, Cha EDK, Lynch CP, Jacob KC, Patel MR, Geoghegan CE, Jadczak CN, Mohan S, Singh K. Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as Predictors of Revision Lumbar Decompression Procedures. Neurospine 2022; 18:863-870. [PMID: 35000342 PMCID: PMC8752697 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2142230.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) as predictors for revision lumbar decompression (LD).
Methods Patients who underwent primary, single or multilevel LD were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized according to whether or not they underwent revision LD within 2 years of the primary procedure. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item Short Form Health Survey and 12-item Veterans RAND physical component score (SF-12 PCS and VR-12 PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF) were recorded. Delta PROM scores were evaluated for differences between groups and as a risk factor for a revision LD.
Results The study included 135 patients, 91 undergoing a primary procedure only and 44 undergoing a primary and revision procedure. Matched patients did not demonstrate any significant differences in demographics or perioperative characteristics. Patients who underwent a revision had a mean time to revision of 7.4 ± 5.7 months. Primary cohort significantly improved for all PROMs (all p < 0.05), while the primary plus revision cohort significantly improved for VAS back, ODI, and PROMIS-PF (all p < 0.05). However, cohorts differed in VAS back and PROMIS-PF (p < 0.05). Delta PROMs were not a significant risk factor for revision except at 6 months for PROMIS-PF (p = 0.024).
Conclusion LD has been associated with reliable outcomes, but early identification of patients at risk for revision is critical. This study suggests that tools such as PROMIS-PF may serve a role in predicting who is at risk and the 6-month follow-up period may be valuable for counseling patients who are not experiencing improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Elliot D K Cha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Conor P Lynch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kevin C Jacob
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Madhav R Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cara E Geoghegan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Caroline N Jadczak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Shruthi Mohan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nolte MT, Louie PK, Basques BA, Varthi AG, Paul JC, Khanna K, Khurana T, Chaudhri A, Samartzis D, Goldberg EJ, An HS. Patients Undergoing 3-Level-or-Greater Decompression-Only Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Have Similar Outcomes to Those Undergoing Single-Level Surgery at 2 Years. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15:945-952. [PMID: 34551931 PMCID: PMC8651207 DOI: 10.14444/8124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stability following multilevel decompressive laminectomy without fusion has been debated using in vitro biomechanical and radiographic models. However, there is a lack of information regarding clinical outcomes for these patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the association between clinical outcomes and number of levels decompressed via laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent a primary lumbar laminectomy between 2009 and 2015 by senior orthopedic spine surgeons for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the number of decompression levels: single level or 3 or more levels. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained in the form of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for the back and leg, 12-Item Short Form Mental and Physical Survey scores, and Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Mental and Physical Survey scores. RESULTS Overall, 138 consecutive patients were assessed, of which 106 underwent a single-level and 32 underwent a 3-or-more-level laminectomy. Average follow-up was 24.2 months. There were no significant differences in the preoperative VAS back, VAS leg, or ODI scores between the single-level laminectomy and 3-or-more-level laminectomy groups. Both groups of patients experienced significant improvements in these clinical outcomes postoperatively with no clinically significant difference in the degree of improvement. Reoperation rates were low and similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing decompression of 3 or more levels present with similar postoperative outcomes to those who undergo a single-level decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Under specific clinical and radiographic criteria, a multilevel decompression of 3 or more levels may be a safe and effective procedure with acceptable outcomes at 2 years after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T. Nolte
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Philip K. Louie
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Bryce A. Basques
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arya G. Varthi
- Yale School of Medicine, Orthopaedics, and Rehabilitation, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Krishn Khanna
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tarush Khurana
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arshan Chaudhri
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Dino Samartzis
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edward J. Goldberg
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Howard S. An
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nolte MT, Parrish JM, Jenkins NW, Cha EDK, Lynch CP, Mohan S, Geoghegan CE, Jadczak CN, Hrynewycz NM, Singh K. The Influence of Comorbidity on Postoperative Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression. Clin Spine Surg 2021; 34:E390-E396. [PMID: 33560010 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the association between comorbidity burden and reaching minimum clinically important difference (MCID) following lumbar decompression (LD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There is limited research on the influence of preoperative comorbidity burden on patient-reported outcome improvement following LD. METHODS A prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for eligible spine surgeries between 2015 and 2019. Inclusion criteria were primary, single, or multilevel LD. Patients were excluded for missing preoperative patient-reported outcome surveys. Stratification was based on Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score: 0 points (no comorbidities), 1-2 points (low CCI), ≥3 points (high CCI). Demographics and perioperative characteristics were evaluated for differences. Linear regression assessed postoperative improvement for visual analogue scale (VAS) back, VAS leg, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Short Form-12 Physical Composite Score (SF-12 PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF) scores through 1 year. Achievement rate of MCID was compared between groups and evaluated for significant predictors. RESULTS Three hundred fourteen patients were included (123 no comorbidities, 100 low CCI, 91 high CCI). Higher CCI patients were older, more likely to smoke, and have comorbid diseases (all P<0.001). Perioperative differences included increased operative time, levels decompressed, length of stay, and discharge day in the CCI≥3 group. No differences in the rate of achieving MCID for VAS back, VAS leg, and ODI. CCI≥3 subgroup had a lower rate of reaching MCID at 6 months for SF-12 PCS, at 6 weeks for PROMIS-PF, and the overall rate for both SF-12 PCS and PROMIS-PF (all P<0.05). Multilevel procedures was a predictor for MCID achievement for ODI. CONCLUSIONS Patients with increased comorbidities undergoing LD had an equivalent MCID achievement rate for pain and disability metrics through 1 year. High CCI patients did, however, have a lower rate of achieving MCID for their physical function surveys which suggests that comorbidity burden influences improvement in physical function following LD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nolte MT, Parrish JM, Jenkins NW, Cha EDK, Lynch CP, Jacob KC, Patel MR, Jadczak CN, Geoghegan CE, Mohan S, Podnar J, Buvanendran A, Singh K. Multimodal Analgesic Management for Lumbar Decompression Surgery in the Ambulatory Setting: Clinical Case Series and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg 2021; 154:e656-e664. [PMID: 34343679 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective pain control is vital for successful surgery in the ambulatory setting. Our study aims to characterize a case series of patients who underwent lumbar decompression (LD) in the ambulatory surgical center (ASC) with the use of a multimodal analgesic (MMA) protocol. METHODS A prospective surgical registry was retrospectively assessed for patients who underwent single or multilevel LD in an ASC using MMA from 2013 to 2019. Observation in excess of 23 hours was not permitted at the ASC, and patients were required to be discharged the same day. Length of stay, patient-reported visual analog scale pain scores before discharge, and the quantity of narcotic medications administered to patients before discharge were recorded. Quantity of narcotic medications were converted into units of oral morphine equivalents and summed across all types of narcotic medications prescribed. RESULTS A total of 499 patients were included. In total, 86.0% (429) of the patients underwent a single-level decompression procedure, 13.8% (69) of patients underwent a 2-level, and 0.2% (1) of the patients underwent a 3-level procedure; 83.6% (417) of the patients in this study underwent a primary LD, and 14.0% (70) underwent a revision decompression. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest clinical case series focused on LD procedures within an ASC requiring no planned 23-hour observation. This study demonstrates the feasibility of performing LD surgery in an ASC with proper patient selection, surgical technique, and MMA protocol. All patients were discharged from the surgical center on the same day of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - James M Parrish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nathaniel W Jenkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Elliot D K Cha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Conor P Lynch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kevin C Jacob
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Madhav R Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Caroline N Jadczak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cara E Geoghegan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Shruthi Mohan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeffrey Podnar
- Department of Anesthesiology, Midwest Anesthesia Partners LLC, Park Ridge, IL, USA
| | | | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nolte MT, Jenkins NW, Parrish JM, Mohan S, Geoghegan CE, Jadczak CN, Hrynewycz NM, Singh K. The Influence of Sex on Clinical Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15:763-769. [PMID: 34315760 DOI: 10.14444/8098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research focused on postoperative outcomes among men and women undergoing minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MIS LD) spine surgery is sparse. This study aims to assess the influence of sex on postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) evaluations and achievement of a minimum clinically important difference (MCID). METHODS A prospectively maintained surgical database was retrospectively queried for patients undergoing primary or revision, single or multilevel LD procedures from 2011 to 2019. Patients with incomplete visual analog scale (VAS) leg or back surveys were excluded. Demographic and operative variables were recorded, and a chi-squared analysis or t tests were used to compare by sex. PROMs were evaluated from preoperative to postoperative time points. PROM score differences and postoperative improvement were evaluated between sexes by a t test. Achievement of MCID by sex was compared using chi-squared analysis. RESULTS The study cohort (n = 572) was 70% male (n = 398), had an average age of 47 years, and 42% were obese. Sexes differed in preoperative VAS leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and 12-item short form (SF-12)-physical composite score (PCS) scores (all P < .05) and in ODI at 6 and 12 weeks (P = .048; P = .001) and VAS back and leg scores at 6 months (P = .039; P = .019). Both sexes significantly improved (P < .050) all PROMs at all time points except for VAS back at 1 year for women and ODI at 6 weeks and 6 months for men. The only significant difference in achievement of MCID was for ODI at 6 months (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS Significant preoperative differences were observed among sexes with ODI, SF-12-PCS, and VAS leg scores. By 1 year, there were no significant sex differences for any PROM or for achievement of MCID. MIS LD has an equivalent role for both sexes in achieving MCID. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results demonstrate no sex difference in PROMs following LD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nathaniel W Jenkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James M Parrish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Shruthi Mohan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Cara E Geoghegan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Caroline N Jadczak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nadia M Hrynewycz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jenkins NW, Parrish JM, Nolte MT, Jadczak CN, Geoghegan CE, Mohan S, Hrynewycz NM, Singh K. Charlson Comorbidity Index: An Inaccurate Predictor of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Fusion Outcomes. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15:770-779. [PMID: 34266930 DOI: 10.14444/8099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a scarcity of research on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and its influence on minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement after minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The objective of this study is to detail the association between the CCI and attaining MCID after MIS TLIF. METHODS A prospective surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for spine surgeries between May 2015 and February 2019. Inclusion criteria were primary or revision, 1- or 2-level MIS TLIF procedures. Patients were stratified based on CCI score: 0 points (no comorbidities), 1-2 points (mild CCI), ≥3 points (moderate CCI). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were assessed by subgroup using appropriate statistical analysis. Subgroups were analyzed with linear regression or χ2 tests for continuous or categorical variables, respectively. Subgroup scores, improvement, and MCID achievement were assessed at postoperative timepoints (eg, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SF-12 Physical Composite Score (PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF). RESULTS A total of 171 patients were included (n = 51 [no comorbidities], n = 73 [mild CCI], and n = 47 [moderate CCI]). Higher CCI patients were older and more likely to be smokers, diabetic, arthritic, hypertensive, or have a malignancy history (P < 0.003). Preoperatively, ODI and PROMIS PF were the only patient-reported outcomes with a significant association by CCI group (P = 0.015 and 0.014). Back pain was the only measure that had a significant association with the CCI subgroup at 1 year for score (P = 0.002) or MCID (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS By 1 year, regardless of the number of comorbidities, a similar proportion of patients undergoing MIS TLIF were able to achieve MCID for visual analog scale leg, SF-12 PCS, and PROMIS PF. Patients with higher comorbidities are not likely to experience a significant difference in symptom improvement. Regardless of CCI score, MIS TLIF can have a significant benefit for patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Text.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel W Jenkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James M Parrish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Caroline N Jadczak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Cara E Geoghegan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Shruthi Mohan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nadia M Hrynewycz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jenkins NW, Parrish JM, Nolte MT, Jadczak CN, Mohan S, Geoghegan CE, Hrynewycz NM, Podnar J, Buvanendran A, Singh K. Multimodal Analgesic Management for Cervical Spine Surgery in the Ambulatory Setting. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15:219-227. [PMID: 33900978 DOI: 10.14444/8030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient selection and analgesic techniques, such as the multimodal analgesic (MMA) protocol, aid in ambulatory surgical center (ASC) cervical spine surgery. The purpose of this case series is to characterize patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and total cervical disc replacement (CDR) in an ASC with an enhanced MMA protocol. METHODS A prospectively maintained registry was retrospectively reviewed for cervical surgeries between May 2013 and August 2019. Inclusion criteria included ASC patients who underwent single-level or multilevel CDR or ACDF using an MMA protocol. Baseline, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics were recorded, including length of stay, visual analog scale pain scores, neck disability index, complications, and narcotics administered. RESULTS A total of 178 patients met inclusion criteria with 125 single-level, 52 two-level, and 1 three-level procedure. Of those patients, 127 underwent ACDF and 51 underwent CDR. The longest procedure was 95 minutes and the mean length of stay was 6.1 hours, with 2 patients requiring hospital admission. All other patients were discharged within 10 hours. One of the admitted patients experienced a postoperative seizure that was later determined to be secondary to drug use and serotonin syndrome. The second patient developed an anterior cervical hematoma 5 hours postoperatively, which was immediately evacuated. The patient was admitted for observation and discharged the next day. CONCLUSION In our study, patients experienced considerable improvement in disability scores, with a low likelihood of postoperative complications. A safe and effective MMA protocol may help facilitate anterior cervical surgery in the outpatient setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Transitioning anterior cervical discectomy and fusions to the ASC requires an appropriate MMA protocol. Our findings reveal that an enhanced MMA protocol will help improve disability scores while keeping the likelihood of postoperative complications low. This supports the ASC setting for cervical spine procedures in appropriate patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel W Jenkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James M Parrish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Caroline N Jadczak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Shruthi Mohan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Cara E Geoghegan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nadia M Hrynewycz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jeffrey Podnar
- Department of Anesthesiology, Midwest Anesthesia Partners LLC, Park Ridge, Illinois
| | | | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, , Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sayari AJ, Harada GK, Basques BA, Louie PK, Gandhi SD, Banks L, Sung AS, Nolte MT, Gosse J, An HS. Duration of Symptoms Does Not Affect Clinical Outcome After Lumbar Arthrodesis. Clin Spine Surg 2021; 34:E72-E79. [PMID: 33633062 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study at a single institution. OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of symptom duration on clinical outcomes after posterolateral lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Nonoperative measures are generally exhausted before patients are indicated for surgical intervention, leaving patients with their symptomatology for varying lengths of time. It is unclear at what point in time surgical intervention may become less efficacious at alleviating preoperative symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent primary elective open posterior lumbar spinal fusion at a single academic institution were included. Patient and operative characteristics were compared between symptom duration groups (group 1: <12 mo of pain, group 2: ≥12 mo of pain). Preoperative and final postoperative visual analog scale back/leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index, were collected. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final radiographs were assessed to measure lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), and the PI-LL difference was calculated. RESULTS In total, 167 patients were included in group 1, whereas 359 patients were included in group 2. Baseline demographics and operative characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Both groups had similar changes in sagittal parameters and had no significant difference in rates of complication, reoperation, discharge to rehabilitation facility, or early adjacent segment degeneration. Both groups demonstrated similar improvement in clinical outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Despite differences in symptom duration, patients who had pain for ≥12 months demonstrated similar improvement after posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis than those who had pain for <12 months. Extended effort of conservative treatments or delay of operative intervention does not appear to negatively impact the eventual outcome of surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash J Sayari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Nolte MT, Harada GK, Louie PK, McCarthy MH, Sayari AJ, Mallow GM, Siyaji Z, Germscheid N, Cheung JPY, Neva MH, El‐Sharkawi M, Valacco M, Sciubba DM, Chutkan NB, An HS, Samartzis D. COVID-19: Current and future challenges in spine care and education - a worldwide study. JOR Spine 2020; 3:e1122. [PMID: 33392457 PMCID: PMC7770197 DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted spine care around the globe. Much uncertainty remains regarding the immediate and long-term future of spine care and education in this COVID-19 era. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional, international study of spine surgeons. METHODS A multi-dimensional survey was distributed to spine surgeons around the world. A total of 73 questions were asked regarding demographics, COVID-19 observations, personal impact, effect on education, adoption of telemedicine, and anticipated challenges moving forward. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess factors related to likelihood of future conference attendance, future online education, and changes in surgical indications. RESULTS A total of 902 spine surgeons from seven global regions completed the survey. Respondents reported a mean level of overall concern of 3.7 on a scale of one to five. 84.0% reported a decrease in clinical duties, and 67.0% reported a loss in personal income. The 82.5% reported being interested in continuing a high level of online education moving forward. Respondents who personally knew someone who tested positive for COVID-19 were more likely to be unwilling to attend a medical conference 1 year from now (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: [0.39, 0.95], P = .029). The 20.0% reported they plan to pursue an increased degree of nonoperative measures prior to surgery 1 year from now, and respondents with a spouse at home (OR: 3.55, 95% CI: [1.14, 11.08], P = .029) or who spend a large percentage of their time teaching (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: [1.02, 2.07], P = .040) were more likely to adopt this practice. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic has had an adverse effect on surgeon teaching, clinical volume, and personal income. In the future, surgeons with family and those personally affected by COVID-19 may be more willing to alter surgical indications and change education and conference plans. Anticipating these changes may help the spine community appropriately plan for future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T. Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation InitiativeRUSH University Medical CenterChicagoUSA
| | - Garrett K. Harada
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation InitiativeRUSH University Medical CenterChicagoUSA
| | - Philip K. Louie
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Michael H. McCarthy
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Arash J. Sayari
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation InitiativeRUSH University Medical CenterChicagoUSA
| | - G. Michael Mallow
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation InitiativeRUSH University Medical CenterChicagoUSA
| | - Zakariah Siyaji
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation InitiativeRUSH University Medical CenterChicagoUSA
| | | | - Jason PY Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyThe University of Hong KongHong Kong
| | - Marko H. Neva
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryTampere University HospitalTampereFinland
| | - Mohammad El‐Sharkawi
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryAssiut University Medical SchoolAssiutEgypt
| | - Marcelo Valacco
- Department of OrthopaedicsChurruca Hospital de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
| | - Daniel M. Sciubba
- Department of NeurosurgeryJohn Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Norman B. Chutkan
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Arizona College of MedicinePhoenixArizonaUSA
| | - Howard S. An
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation InitiativeRUSH University Medical CenterChicagoUSA
| | - Dino Samartzis
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation InitiativeRUSH University Medical CenterChicagoUSA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lu Y, Agarwalla A, Patel BH, Nolte MT, Cancienne J, Verma N, Cole BJ, Forsythe B. Influence of workers' compensation status on postoperative outcomes in patients following biceps tenodesis: a matched-pair cohort analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:2530-2537. [PMID: 33190754 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS Although the literature on the association of workers' compensation (WC) status with negative outcomes after orthopedic surgery is extensive, there is a paucity of evidence on outcomes in WC recipients undergoing biceps tenodesis. We hypothesized that WC patients would report significantly worse outcomes postoperatively on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS Functional and health-related quality-of-life PROMs and a visual analog scale score for pain were administered preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively to consecutive patients undergoing isolated biceps tenodesis between 2014 and 2018 at our institution. Thirty-eight WC patients were matched 1:2 to non-WC patients by age, body mass index, and operative limb. The minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptom state were calculated for all patients via anchor- and distribution-based methods. Rates of achievement and the likelihood of achievement were determined. RESULTS All patients showed significant improvements in all outcome measures (P < .001). WC patients reported inferior postoperative scores on all PROMs examined. WC status significantly predicted a reduced likelihood of achieving substantial clinical benefit for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.81; P = .01) and the patient acceptable symptom state (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.65; P = .003) for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.10-0.61; P = .003), Constant-Murley Subjective Assessment (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.77; P = .016), and visual analog scale pain score (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.16-0.47; P < .001). CONCLUSION WC patients reported inferior scores on all postoperative PROMs and demonstrated lower odds of achieving substantial benefit and satisfaction regarding improvements in both function and pain compared with non-WC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yining Lu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Avinesh Agarwalla
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Bhavik H Patel
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jourdan Cancienne
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nikhil Verma
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian J Cole
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian Forsythe
- Division of Sports Medicine, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jenkins NW, Parrish JM, Nolte MT, Hrynewycz NM, Brundage TS, Singh K. Validating the VR-12 Physical Function Instrument After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with SF-12, PROMIS, and NDI. HSS J 2020; 16:443-451. [PMID: 33380979 PMCID: PMC7749899 DOI: 10.1007/s11420-020-09817-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Development and validation of Veterans RAND 12-item (VR-12) physical component survey (PCS) has been established among civilian and veteran populations but it has not been examined among anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) patients. PURPOSES/QUESTIONS We sought to validate legacy patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with VR-12 PCS among patients undergoing ACDF procedures. METHODS A prospectively collected surgical registry was retrospectively evaluated for elective single or multi-level ACDFs performed for degenerative spinal pathologies from January 2014 to August 2019. Exclusion criteria included missing pre-operative surveys and surgery for trauma, metastasis, or infection. Demographic variables, baseline pathologies, and peri-operative variables were collected. A paired t test evaluated the change from the pre-operative score to each post-operative timepoint for VR-12 PCS, the 12-item Short-Form Survey (SF-12) PCS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated at each timepoint. Correlation was evaluated with a Pearson's correlation coefficient and time-independent partial correlation. RESULTS Of the 202 patients who underwent ACDF, 41.1% were female and the average age was 49.5 years. All PROMs had statistically significantly increased from baseline when compared with post-operative timepoints (12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years). MCID achievement rates increased through 2 years. All timepoints revealed strong VR-12 PCS correlations with SF-12 PCS, PROMIS-PF, and NDI scores. CONCLUSION VR-12 PCS was strongly correlated with the well-validated SF-12 PCS and NDI metrics as well as with the more recent PROMIS-PF. All PROMs demonstrated statistically significant improvement in patients post-operatively. VR-12 PCS is a valid measure of physical function among patients undergoing ACDF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel W. Jenkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
| | - James M. Parrish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
| | - Michael T. Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
| | - Nadia M. Hrynewycz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
| | - Thomas S. Brundage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kunze KN, Lilly DT, Khan JM, Louie PK, Ferguson J, Basques BA, Nolte MT, Dewald CJ. High-Grade Spondylolisthesis in Adults: Current Concepts in Evaluation and Management. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14:327-340. [PMID: 32699755 DOI: 10.14444/7044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Information regarding the treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) in adults has been previously described; however, previous descriptions of the evaluation and surgical management of HGS do not represent more recent and now established approaches. The purpose of the current review is to discuss current concepts in the evaluation and management of patients with HGS. Methods Literature review. Results HGS is diagnosed in up to 11.3% of adults with spondylolisthesis and typically presents as nonspecific lower back pain. Regarding evaluation, a thorough history and physical examination should be performed, which may help predict the presence of HGS. Diagnostic imaging, and specifically the use of spino-pelvic parameters, are now commonly implicated in guiding treatment course and prognosis. When surgical intervention is indicated, surgical approaches include in situ fusion variations, reduction and partial reduction with fusion, and vertebrectomy. Although the majority of studies suggest improvements with these approaches, the literature is limited by a low level of evidence with regards to the superiority of one technique when compared with others. Conclusions HGS is a unique cause of low back pain in adults that carries considerable morbidity, but rarely presents with neurologic symptoms. Although the definitions, classifications, and methods of diagnosis of this spinal deformity have been established and accepted, the ideal surgical management of this deformity remains highly debated. Fusion in situ techniques are often technically easier to perform and provide lower risk of neurologic complications, whereas reduction and fusion techniques offer greater restoration of global spino-pelvic balance. Preoperative spino-pelvic parameters may have utility in assisting in procedural selection; however, future, higher-quality and longer-term studies are warranted to determine the optimal surgical intervention among the widely available techniques currently used, and to better define the indications for these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle N Kunze
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Daniel T Lilly
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jannat M Khan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Philip K Louie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Joseph Ferguson
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Bryce A Basques
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Christopher J Dewald
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sayari AJ, Harada GK, Louie PK, McCarthy MH, Nolte MT, Mallow GM, Siyaji Z, Germscheid N, Cheung JP, Neva MH, El-Sharkawi M, Valacco M, Sciubba DM, Chutkan NB, An HS, Samartzis D. Personal Health of Spine Surgeons Can Impact Perceptions, Decision-Making and Healthcare Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Worldwide Study. Neurospine 2020; 17:313-330. [PMID: 32615695 PMCID: PMC7338966 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2040336.168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if personal health of spine surgeons worldwide influences perceptions, healthcare delivery, and decision-making during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed by distributing a multidimensional survey to spine surgeons worldwide. Questions addressed demographics, impacts and perceptions of COVID-19, and the presence of surgeon comorbidities, which included cancer, cardiac disease, diabetes, obesity, hypertension, respiratory illness, renal disease, and current tobacco use. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify specific comorbidities that influenced various impact measures. RESULTS Across 7 global regions, 36.8% out of 902 respondents reported a comorbidity, of which hypertension (21.9%) and obesity (15.6%) were the most common. Multivariate analysis noted tobacco users were more likely to continue performing elective surgery during the pandemic (odds ratio [OR], 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-4.72; p = 0.001) and were less likely to utilize telecommunication (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.86; p = 0.011), whereas those with hypertension were less likely to warn their patients should the surgeon become infected with COVID-19 (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37-0.91; p = 0.017). Clinicians with multiple comorbidities were more likely to cite personal health as a current stressor (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.07-1.63; p = 0.009) and perceived their hospital's management unfavorably (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.91; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION This is the first study to have mapped global variations of personal health of spine surgeons, key in the development for future wellness and patient management initiatives. This study underscored that spine surgeons worldwide are not immune to comorbidities, and their personal health influences various perceptions, healthcare delivery, and decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash J. Sayari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, RUSH University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Garrett K. Harada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, RUSH University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Philip K. Louie
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, RUSH University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael H. McCarthy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael T. Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, RUSH University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gary M. Mallow
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, RUSH University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Zakariah Siyaji
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, RUSH University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Jason P.Y. Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Marko H. Neva
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Mohammad El-Sharkawi
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Assiut University Medical School, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Marcelo Valacco
- Department of Orthopaedics, Churruca Hospital de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Daniel M. Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Norman B. Chutkan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Howard S. An
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, RUSH University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Dino Samartzis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- The International Spine Research and Innovation Initiative, RUSH University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
The COVID-19 global pandemic presents a challenge to orthopaedic education. Around the world, including in the United States, elective surgeries are being deferred and orthopaedic residents and fellows are being asked to make drastic changes to their daily routines. In the midst of these changes are unique opportunities for resident/fellow growth and development. Educational tools in the form of web-based learning, surgical simulators, and basic competency tests may serve an important role. Challenges are inevitable, but appropriate preparation may help programs ensure continued resident growth, development, and well-being while maintaining high-quality patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Kogan
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (Dr. Kogan, Dr. Hannon, and Dr. Nolte), and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO (Dr. Klein)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Parrish JM, Jenkins NW, Nolte MT, Massel DH, Hrynewycz NM, Brundage TS, Myers JA, Singh K. Predictors of inpatient admission in the setting of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a Minimally Invasive Spine Study Group (MISSG) investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:1-9. [PMID: 32442965 DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.spine20134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedure may be amenable to ambulatory surgery, it has been hypothesized that limitations such as the risk of postoperative ileus and vascular complications have hindered transition of this procedure to the outpatient setting. Identification of independent risk factors predisposing patients to inpatient stays of ≥ 24 hours after ALIF may facilitate better postsurgical outcomes, target modifiable risk factors, and assist in the development of screening tools to transition appropriate patients to the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) setting for this procedure. The purpose of this study was to identify the most relevant risk factors that predispose patients to ≥ 24-hour admission following ALIF. METHODS A prospectively maintained surgical registry was reviewed for patients undergoing single ALIF between May 2006 and December 2019. Demographics, preoperative diagnosis, perioperative variables, and postoperative complications were evaluated according to their relative risk (RR) elevation for an inpatient stay of ≥ 24 hours. A Poisson regression model was used to evaluate predictors of inpatient stays of ≥ 24 hours. Risk factors for inpatient admission of ≥ 24 hours were identified with a stepwise backward regression model. RESULTS A total of 111 patients underwent single-level ALIF (50.9% female and 52.6% male, ≤ 50 years old). Eleven (9.5%) patients were discharged in < 24 hours and 116 remained admitted for ≥ 24 hours. The average inpatient stay was > 2 days (53.7 hours). The most common postoperative complications were fever (body temperature ≥ 100.4°F; n = 4, 3.5%) and blood transfusions (n = 4, 3.5%). Bivariate analysis revealed a preoperative diagnosis of retrolisthesis or lateral listhesis to elevate the RR for an inpatient stay of ≥ 24 hours (RR 1.11, p = 0.001, both diagnoses). Stepwise multivariate analysis demonstrated significant predictors for inpatient stays of ≥ 24 hours to be an operation on L4-5, coexisting degenerative disc disease (DDD) with foraminal stenosis, and herniated nucleus pulposus (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20, p = 0.009, all covariates). CONCLUSIONS This study provides data regarding the incidence of demographic and perioperative characteristics and postoperative complications as they pertain to patients undergoing single-level ALIF. This preliminary investigation identified the most relevant risk factors to be considered before appropriately transitioning ALIF procedures to the ASC. Further studies of preoperative characteristics are needed to elucidate ideal ASC ALIF patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Parrish
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nathaniel W Jenkins
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael T Nolte
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Dustin H Massel
- 2Department of Orthopaedics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Florida; and
| | - Nadia M Hrynewycz
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Thomas S Brundage
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jonathan A Myers
- 3Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kern Singh
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Khan JM, Harada GK, Basques BA, Nolte MT, Louie PK, Iloanya M, Tchalukov K, Berkowitz M, Derman P, Colman M, An HS. Patients with predominantly back pain at the time of lumbar fusion for low-grade spondylolisthesis experience similar clinical improvement to patients with predominantly leg pain: mid-term results. Spine J 2020; 20:276-282. [PMID: 31563578 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2019] [Revised: 09/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Patients with back pain predominance (BPP) have traditionally been thought to derive less predictable symptomatic relief from lumbar fusion surgery. PURPOSE To compare postoperative clinical outcomes as well as degree of improvement in clinical outcome measures between patients with BPP and patients with leg pain predominance (LPP) undergoing open posterior lumbar fusion. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Analysis of patients who underwent an open posterior lumbar fusion for low-grade (Meyerding Grade I or II) degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis from 2011 to 2018 was conducted. Surgery was indicated after failure of conservative treatment to address radiculopathy and/or neurogenic claudication. Patients were excluded if they were under 18 years of age at the time of surgery, had less than 6 months of follow-up, presented with a lumbar vertebral body fracture, tumor, or infection, or underwent a fusion surgery that extended to the thoracic spine, high-grade spondylolisthesis, or concomitant deformity. OUTCOME MEASURES Radiographs obtained at preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final visits were evaluated for presence or absence of fusion. Patient-reported outcomes were recorded at preoperative and final clinic visits that included: visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg pain, and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was analyzed, along with rates of postoperative complication and reoperation. METHODS Preoperative and final patient-reported outcomes were obtained. Achievement of MCID was evaluated using following thresholds: ODI 14.9, VAS-back pain 2.1, VAS-leg pain 2.8. For analysis, patients were divided into two groups based on predominant location of pain: predominantly VAS-back pain (BPP) and predominantly VAS-leg pain (LPP). RESULTS One hundred forty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 71 had LPP, and 70 had BPP. Patients with preoperative LPP experienced greater improvements in VAS-leg (p<.001) compared to those with BPP, whereas patients with preoperative BPP experienced greater improvements in VAS-back (p=.011) postoperatively compared to those with LPP. There were no differences in the final clinical outcomes. Additionally, LPP achieved MCID for VAS-leg (p=.027) at significantly higher proportion than BPP and BPP achieved MCID for VAS-back (p=.050) at significantly higher proportion than LPP. CONCLUSIONS Patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis who underwent an open posterior lumbar fusion had improvement in symptoms regardless of presentation with BPP or LPP. In properly indicated patients, posterior spinal fusion is effective for those with BPP in the setting of experiencing both leg and back pain, and clinicians can use this information for perioperative discussions and surgical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jannat M Khan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Garrett K Harada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bryce A Basques
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Philip K Louie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael Iloanya
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Konstantin Tchalukov
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark Berkowitz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Peter Derman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Howard S An
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Injury and musculoskeletal disorders are a major cause of death, disability, and decreased quality of life in developing countries. Thus, understanding the cost-effectiveness of orthopedic care in low- and middle-income countries may help to guide future outreach. A systematic review was conducted on the literature available on the cost-effectiveness of surgical trips that provided orthopedic-related care and extracted data regarding the cost-effectiveness of the orthopedic-related interventions. The cost-effectiveness of the interventions was determined using the WHO-CHOICE thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T. Nolte
- Resident Physician, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Jacob S. Nasser
- Clinical Research Associate, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kevin C. Chung
- Professor of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, Assistant Dean for Faculty Affairs, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bohl DD, Nolte MT, Ong K, Lau E, Calkins TE, Della Valle CJ. Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated with Reductions in the Rates of Dislocation and Acetabular Component Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101:250-256. [PMID: 30730484 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.18.00108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior work suggests that computer-assisted navigation improves acetabular component position during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, it is not known whether this translates to improvements in clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to test for associations between navigation use and the risk of dislocation, aseptic revision of the acetabular component, aseptic revision of the femoral component, aseptic revision of either component, and acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study, conducted using the 100% Medicare Part A claims data set. Inclusion criteria were an age of ≥65 years and primary THA for osteoarthritis. First, the association between navigation use and patient and hospital characteristics was assessed. Second, while controlling for these characteristics, multivariate regression was used to test for the association of navigation use and the outcomes listed above. RESULTS A total of 803,732 primary THA procedures were identified; 14,540 (1.81%) involved the use of navigation. Navigation use was associated with younger age, other/unknown race, the Western census region, higher socioeconomic status, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, shorter length of stay, private hospitals, teaching hospitals, and larger hospitals (p < 0.05 for each). Navigation use was associated with a lower rate of dislocation (1.00% versus 1.70% for no navigation; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58 to 0.82; p < 0.001) and aseptic revision of the acetabular component (1.03% versus 1.55%; adjusted HR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.88; p < 0.001). Navigation was not associated with aseptic revision of the femoral component (1.54% versus 1.87%; p = 0.064), aseptic revision of either component (1.91% versus 2.31%; p = 0.077), acute PJI at 6 weeks (0.34% versus 0.45%; p = 0.121), or acute PJI at 90 days (0.50% versus 0.66%; p = 0.458). CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study suggest that navigation is associated with reductions in the rates of dislocation and aseptic acetabular revision following primary THA. However, these results should be interpreted carefully in the setting of potential confounding by unmeasured variables, such as surgeon volume, family support, and patient compliance. Causality cannot be inferred until further prospective trials can vet this technology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D Bohl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michael T Nolte
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kevin Ong
- Exponent, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Tyler E Calkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Craig J Della Valle
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Yamamoto M, Kurimoto S, Iwatsuki K, Nishizuka T, Nolte MT, Hirata H. Sonography-guided arthroscopic excision is more effective for treating volar wrist ganglion than dorsal wrist ganglion. Acta Orthop Belg 2018; 84:78-83. [PMID: 30457504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment results of sonography-guided arthroscopic excision for volar and dorsal wrist ganglions. A total of 42 patients with wrist ganglions underwent sonography-guided arthroscopic resection. Clinical outcome measures included wrist range of motion, grip strength, patient-rated questionnaire Hand20, and numerical pain rating scale. All patients were assessed for recurrence throughout the follow-up period. Ganglions were located at the dorsal wrist in 26 cases and at the volar wrist in 16 cases. The mean Hand20 and pain scores were significantly improved after sonography-guided arthroscopic resection for both volar and dorsal wrist ganglions. Recurrence was seen in six cases (23%) of dorsal wrist ganglion but no cases of volar wrist ganglion (P < .05). The use of sonography-guided arthroscopic ganglion excision is better for treating volar wrist ganglion than dorsal wrist ganglion.
Collapse
|
42
|
Nolte MT, Maroukis BL, Chung KC, Mahmoudi E. A Systematic Review of Economic Analysis of Surgical Mission Trips Using the World Health Organization Criteria. World J Surg 2017; 40:1874-84. [PMID: 27160452 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3542-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has developed tools to standardize economic evaluations of global health interventions, little is known about the cost-effectiveness of surgical mission trips and their economic values. Our objective was to systematically evaluate the current literature on surgical volunteering trips to measure their adherence to WHO CHOosing Interventions that are cost-effective (WHO-CHOICE). We hypothesized that the majority of studies use some type of cost-effectiveness analysis that do not adhere to these standards. METHODS A systematic review of Pubmed, Medline, and Embase databases was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, with inclusion criteria set a priori. Of the 908 publications screened, 72 were selected for full text review; 17 met inclusion criteria. RESULTS Only 17 out of 72 studies reported some type of economic analysis. We categorized the studies into service, educational, and combination (service and educational) surgical trips. Although seven of the service studies calculated the cost per disability-adjusted life year averted, the results were not based on WHO-CHOICE standards to facilitate comparisons among alternative options. Furthermore, none of the three educational trips calculated the value of the education provided, but only published cost estimates of the resources used during the trip. CONCLUSIONS Although a few studies performed some type of economic analysis, owing to their non-adherence to WHO-CHOICE standards, the results were not comparable to other studies. International surgical trips are expensive. To improve the efficacy and optimal use of limited resources, studies on surgical trips should follow the guidelines set by the WHO-CHOICE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brianna L Maroukis
- Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kevin C Chung
- Section of Plastic Surgery, Assistant Dean for Faculty Affairs, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Elham Mahmoudi
- Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Building 16, Room G024W, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nolte MT, Shauver MJ, Chung KC, Giladi AM. Effect of Policy Change on the Use of Long-Distance Transport and Follow-Up Care for Patients With Traumatic Finger Amputations. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42:610-617.e2. [PMID: 28499510 PMCID: PMC5545056 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In January 2006, the American College of Emergency Physicians released updated guidelines for air transfer. Digit amputation and near-amputation were no longer an indication for this costly service. We analyzed the effect of this update on the use of air transport and associated care outcomes for finger amputation patients and examined factors involved in providing follow-up care for these patients. METHODS A retrospective chart review identified all patients treated for traumatic finger amputation between 1995 and 2012 at a major hand trauma referral center. Analysis of available outcome measures was conducted using multiple logistic and linear regression models. Analysis of factors affecting frequency of return visits was performed via negative binomial regression. RESULTS We identified 724 patients with isolated traumatic finger amputations. A total of 267 patients (37%) were transferred from an outside hospital. Patients injured after 2006 were less likely to be transferred via air, with a decrease from 29.5% pre-2006 to 14.9% post-2006. There was no difference in likelihood of replantation success, length of hospital stay, or number of return visits pre- versus post-2006. Patients transferred via helicopter after 2006 were more likely to be younger than 20 years of age and injured in a winter month. Following successful replantation, work-relatedness was associated with a higher number of return visits, whereas increasing age and transfer from farther than 100 miles away were associated with fewer. CONCLUSIONS After the American College of Emergency Physicians policy update, decreased use of emergency air transport to a hand trauma referral center for patients with traumatic finger amputations did not adversely affect care delivery and outcomes. These changes may be successfully implemented on a center-by-center basis to reduce costs without detriment to patient care; however, coordination of follow-up care for long-distance transport patients may require special focus when designing policy around referral centers. TYPE PF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melissa J. Shauver
- Clinical Research Coordinator, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kevin C. Chung
- Professor of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, Assistant Dean for Faculty Affairs, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Aviram M. Giladi
- Resident, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yamamoto M, Natsume T, Kurimoto S, Iwatsuki K, Nishizuka T, Nolte MT, Hirata H. Patients with benign hand tumors are indicated for surgery according to patient-rated outcome measures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70:487-494. [PMID: 28153429 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2016] [Revised: 12/07/2016] [Accepted: 12/22/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study assessed the treatment outcomes of upper extremity benign tumors using the patient-rated outcome measures of Hand20 questionnaire. METHODS In total, 304 patients who underwent surgery for benign bone and soft tissue tumors of the upper limb were included. Tumors were classified into three size groups: <1 cm, 1-3 cm, and >3 cm. Tumors were divided with respect to location: digit, hand, wrist, forearm, elbow, upper arm, or axilla. We prospectively assessed responses to the Hand20 questionnaire that was administered both before and after surgery. RESULTS The mean Hand20 and pain scores significantly improved after surgery in patients with ganglion cysts, giant cell tumors of the tendon sheath, enchondromas, or pyogenic granulomas. For patients with hemangiomas, schwannomas, or glomus tumors, although the mean pain scores improved significantly following surgery, there were no significant changes in the mean Hand20 scores. However, the statistical power for this analysis was low. The mean Hand20 and pain scores improved significantly, regardless of the size grouping. The mean Hand20 scores significantly improved after surgery in patients with finger, thumb, hand, or wrist tumors. Except for elbow to axillary tumors, the mean pain scores significantly improved in all patients. CONCLUSION The results of Hand20 and pain scores suggest that most patients with benign hand tumors are indicated for surgery, but the degree of improvement differs according to tumor pathology and location but not size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiro Yamamoto
- Department of Hand Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
| | - Tadahiro Natsume
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kariya Toyota General Hospital, 5-15 Sumiyoshi-cho, Kariya 448-8505, Japan
| | - Shigeru Kurimoto
- Department of Hand Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Iwatsuki
- Department of Hand Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan
| | - Takanobu Nishizuka
- Department of Hand Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan
| | - Michael T Nolte
- University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Hitoshi Hirata
- Department of Hand Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chung KC, Nolte MT, Mahmoudi E. Management strategies in surgical research: the multidisciplinary team. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017; 42:213-215. [PMID: 28128032 DOI: 10.1177/1753193416680117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- K C Chung
- Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - M T Nolte
- Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - E Mahmoudi
- Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality normative data requires a diverse sample of participants and plays an important role in the appropriate use of health outcomes. Using social media and other online resources for survey recruitment is a tempting prospect, but the effectiveness of these methods in collecting a diverse sample is unknown. The purpose of this study is to pilot test four methods of recruitment to determine their ability to produce a sample representative of the general US population. METHODS This project is part of a larger study to gather normative data for the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). We used flyers, e-mail, Facebook, and an institution-specific clinical research recruitment Web site to direct participants to complete an online version of the MHQ. Participants also provided comorbidity and demographic information. RESULTS The institution-specific recruitment Web site yielded the greatest number of respondents in an age distribution that mirrored the US population. Facebook was effective for recruiting young adults, and e-mail was successful for recruiting the older adults. None of the methods was successful in reaching an ethnically diverse sample. CONCLUSIONS Obtaining normative data that is truly representative of the US population is a difficult task. The use of any one recruitment method is unlikely to result in a representative sample, but a greater understanding of these methods will empower researchers to use them to target specific populations. This pilot analysis provides support for the use of Facebook and clinical research sites in addition to traditional methods of e-mail and paper flyers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melissa J. Shauver
- />Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Kevin C. Chung
- />University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI USA , />Section of Plastic Surgery, The University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2130 Taubman Center, SPC 5340, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5340 USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Nolte MT, Pirofsky B, Gerritz GA, Golding B. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for antibody deficiency. Clin Exp Immunol 1979; 36:237-43. [PMID: 477026 PMCID: PMC1537711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Twenty patients with antibody deficiency were treated at random with either intramuscular immune serum globulin (ISG) or intravenous modified immune serum globulin (M-ISG). Fourteen patients received of 259 M-ISG infusions during 242 months of treatment. Catastrophic vasomotor reactions were not observed. A single dose of 150 mg/kilo M-ISG increased serum IgG values a mean 248 mg%. Intravenous M-ISG therapy was effective in reducing the incidence of acute infections. Subjects receiving M-ISG developed 0.103 acute infections per month of treatment. Patients injected with ISG had 0.295 acute infections per month of treatment. Seven subjects had separate courses of both intravenous M-ISG and intramuscular ISG. Acute infections per month of treatment for M-ISG and ISG were 0.104 and 0.406, respectively.
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that host resistance factors may be abnormal in Guamanians in whom amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinsonism-dementia develop, cellular immunity was evaluated in both diseases and compared to that of Guamanians with other nervous-system diseases, normal adult Guamanians and non-Guamanians with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinsonism. Diminished responses to skin-test antigens, lymphopenia, diminished per cent and total T cells and, less frequently, decreased mitogen responses were seen in Guamanian patients with amytorophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinsonism-dementia but not in the other patient or normal groups. Guamanian patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and diminished cellular immunity had an increased frequency of HLA-Bw35 (P less than 0.005) and shorter mean duration of disease (P less than 0.05) than those with normal cellular immunity. In Parkinsonism dementia diminished cellular immunity was less strongly associated with HLA-BW35 (P less than 0.05) and was not associated with differences in duration of disease. Normal Guamanians and those with other nervous-system diseases showed no association of diminished cellular immunity with HLA-Bw35. The association appeared disease-related, with onset concomitant with the neurologic expression of Guamanian amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinsonism-dementia.
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Immunological function was evaluated in 9 patients who received oxisuran at a dose range of 5-90 mg/kg, for periods of 5-40 weeks. Bone marrow cytotoxicity and lymphopenia did not occur. Established humoral immunological reactions were unaffected by oxisuran. Only 6 of 19 previously positive skin tests reverted to negative. Primary cellular immune reactivity was markedly suppressed. Allogenic skin graft survival was prolonged to a mean of 30.7 days and only 2 of 9 patients were successfully sensitized to dinitrochlorobenzene and Keyhole limpet hemocyanin, respectively. Both IgG and IgM responses to primary typhoid immunization were inhibited. In vitro peripheral blood lymphocyte activity in phytohemagglutinin and mixed lymphocyte culture tests remained normal. These data suggest that oxisuran interferes with the afferent limb of the immune system and may thereby be clinically useful in human transplantation.
Collapse
|