Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cervical Laminoplasty is Associated With Lower Health Care Costs as Compared With Cervical Fusion Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to examine the cost of CLP versus CF stratified by approach to guide decision-making.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical laminoplasty (CLP) and cervical fusion (CF) are viable alternatives for surgical management of cervical spine myelopathy, with no clear consensus on clinical superiority. However, despite clinical equivalence in patient outcomes, there is limited data on the relative costs between CLP and CF.

METHODS

This study searched PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases. Inclusion criteria were articles that examined the cost between CLP and any type of CF (stratified by anterior, posterior, or combined approach). A random-effects continuous model for meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean difference (SMD).

RESULTS

Eleven articles were included. Patients (n = 21,033) had an average age of 56.0 ± 3.6 years and underwent either CLP (n = 4364), posterior CF (n = 3529), anterior CF (n = 13,084), or combined CF (n = 56). The mean reported cost among patients who underwent CLP (n=3742) was significantly lower compared with patients who underwent CF (n = 6329), irrespective of the approach for CF (P = 0.028; SMD = -2.965). For subgroup analysis by surgical approach, the mean reported cost among patients treated with CLP was significantly lower as compared with patients treated with posterior CF (P = 0.013; SMD = -1.861) and anterior CF (P < 0.001; SMD = -0.344). Patients who underwent CLP had a significantly lower mean hardware cost than patients who underwent posterior CF (P < 0.001; SMD = -3.275).

CONCLUSIONS

CLP appears to be associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant lower reported costs than CF, irrespective of the approach based on meta-analysis of low or moderate-quality retrospective studies. CLP may also have lower reported costs than both posterior CF and anterior CF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Direct anterior decompression in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament significantly relieves short-segment spinal cord high signal

BACKGROUND

In patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine (OPLL), high spinal cord signal (HCS) is frequently observed in the spinal cord of the corresponding segment. However, studies on the differences in the improvement of high spinal cord signal due to different surgical approaches are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the improvement of high spinal cord signal in long and short segments with different choices of surgical approaches.

METHODS

In this study, we conducted a meticulous review of medical records for patients diagnosed with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Demographic variables, including gender, age, and body mass index (BMI), were systematically recorded. We evaluated the severity of neurological impairment using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores both preoperatively and at multiple postoperative follow-up points. Neurological assessments were complemented by serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) to measure the extent of high-signal changes (HCS) in the spinal cord, and the alteration of the HCS was quantified by the SCR (the ratio between the signal intensity value of the HCS region and the signal intensity value of the normal spinal cord region at C7-T1).

RESULTS

In the short-segment high signal change (HCS) group, comparisons of JOA score improvement (Recovery1) and HCS improvement (CR1) at 6 months postoperatively did not demonstrate significant differences between the surgical approaches (P > 0.05; Table 1). However, at the 2-year follow-up, patients who underwent anterior surgery exhibited significantly greater improvements in both JOA scores (Recovery2) and HCS (CR2), with statistical significance achieved (P < 0.05; Table 1). In contrast, in the long-segment HCS group, there was no significant difference between the anterior and posterior surgical approaches in terms of JOA improvement and HCS improvement at 6 months and 2 years postoperatively (P > 0.05; Table 2).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with OPLL who present with spinal cord high signal, anterior surgery by resection of the ossified posterior longitudinal ligament and direct decompression is more conducive to regression of small spinal cord high signal and improvement of clinical neurological function if the extent of spinal cord high signal is small.

A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient-reported outcomes and surgical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy include ACDF and cervical laminoplasty. Given that the literature has been mixed regarding the optimal approach, especially in patients without kyphosis, there is a need for additional studies investigating outcomes between ACDF and cervical laminoplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of adult patients undergoing 3 or 4-level surgery. Patients with preoperative kyphosis based on C2-C7 Cobb angles were excluded. The electronic medical record and institutional databases were reviewed for baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients who underwent ACDF and 52 patients who underwent laminoplasty were included in the study. The laminoplasty cohort had a higher overall Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.10 ± 1.43 vs 2.39 ± 1.57, P = 0.011). Both groups had a comparable number of levels decompressed, C2-C7 lordosis, and diagnosis of myelopathy versus myeloradiculopathy. Patients who underwent laminoplasty had a longer length of stay (2.04 ± 1.15 vs 1.48 ± 0.70, P = 0.003) but readmission, complication, and revision rates were similar. Both groups had similar improvement in myelopathy scores (∆modified Japanese Orthopedic Association: 1.11 ± 3.09 vs 1.06 ± 3.37, P = 0.639). ACDF had greater improvement in Neck Disability Index (∆Neck Disability Index: -11.66 ± 19.2 vs -1.13 ± 11.2, P < 0.001), neck pain (∆Visual Analog Scale-neck: -2.69 ± 2.78 vs -0.83 ± 2.55, P = 0.003), and arm pain (∆Visual Analog Scale-arm: -2.47 ± 3.15 vs -0.48 ± 3.19, P = 0.010). These findings persisted in multivariate analysis except for Neck Disability Index.

CONCLUSION

ACDF and cervical laminoplasty appear equally efficacious at halting myelopathic progression. However, patients who underwent ACDF had greater improvements in arm pain at 1 year postoperatively. Longitudinal studies evaluating the efficacy of laminoplasty to mitigate adjacent segment disease are indicated to establish a robust risk-benefit assessment for these 2 procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multisegment Ossification of Cervical Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the existing literature and conduct a systematic evaluation of the clinical outcomes associated with anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) and posterior laminoplasty (LP) for the treatment of multisegment ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search of databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI, from the inception of the initial database to March 2023. We analyzed various parameters, including demographic data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, cervical curvature, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and postoperative complications. Two independent reviewers screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Our evaluation encompassed 7 studies involving a total of 467 patients. The patient cohort was divided into 2 groups: Group A (ACAF) comprised 226 patients, while Group B (LP) comprised 241 patients. Overall, our statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the 2 groups (P < 0.05) in terms of intraoperative blood loss, operative time, JOA score, JOA score improvement rate, postoperative VAS score, postoperative cervical curvature, and the incidence of certain postoperative complications (C5 nerve root paralysis, dysphagia, and axial symptoms). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage and postoperative total complications between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that, in the treatment of multilevel cervical OPLL, ACAF yields superior outcomes compared to LP. Specifically, ACAF improves postoperative neurologic function, reduces postoperative pain, lowers intraoperative blood loss, improves postoperative cervical curvature, and decreases the incidence of C5 nerve root paralysis and postoperative axial symptoms. Nonetheless, ACAF is associated with longer operative times and a higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia, though the overall incidence of postoperative complications is similar. It is important to note that these conclusions should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited sample size and the variable quality of the included studies. Further research involving larger, high-quality studies is warranted to validate these findings.

An Algorithmic Roadmap for the Surgical Management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Narrative Review

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a leading cause of disability, and its surgical management is crucial for improving patient neurological outcomes. Given the varied presentations and severities of DCM, treatment options are diverse. Surgeons often face challenges in selecting the most appropriate surgical approach because there is no universally correct answer. This narrative review aimed to aid the decision-making process in treating DCM by presenting a structured treatment algorithm. The authors categorized surgical scenarios based on an algorithm, outlining suitable treatment methods for each case. Four primary scenarios were identified based on the number of levels requiring surgery and K-line status: (1) K-line (+) and ≤3 levels, (2) K-line (+) and ≥3 levels, (3) K-line (-) and ≤3 levels, and (4) K-line (-) and ≥3 levels. This categorization aids in determining the appropriateness of anterior or posterior approaches and the necessity for fusion, considering the surgical level and K-line status. The complexity of surgical situations and diversity of treatment methods for DCM can be effectively managed using an algorithmic approach. Furthermore, surgical techniques that minimize the stages and address challenging conditions could enhance treatment outcomes in DCM.

The Association between High Preoperative MRI-based Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) Score and Titanium Mesh Cage Subsidence after Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion

OBJECTIVE

Recently, the MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score has been shown to correlate with Hounsfeld units (HU) value, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-score and predict osteoporotic fractures. Preoperative cervical HU value is an independent correlative factor for early titanium mesh cage (TMC) subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). However, to date the direct association between cervical VBQ score and TMC subsidence has not been studied. This study aims to investigate the predictive effect of cervical VBQ score derived from sagittal non-contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI on the early TMC subsidence after ACCF.

METHODS

Patients who underwent one-level ACCF from January 2016 to January 2020 were included. We retrospectively collected baseline data on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), disease type, level of surgery and radiology parameters. The cervical VBQ score was measured using preoperative non-contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to screen the independent risk factors of TMC subsidence. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under curve (AUC) were performed to assess the predictive ability of TMC subsidence based on the cervical VBQ score. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine the correlations between the cervical VBQ score and TMC subsidence.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients who underwent one-level ACCF were included in this study, and 46 (34.33%) patients had TMC subsidence. Univariable analyses demonstrated that the age, TMC placement depth and VBQ score were associated with subsidence. The cervical VBQ score in the subsidence group was significantly higher than that in the no subsidence group (3.75 ± 0.45 vs. 3.20 ± 0.42, p < 0.001). The multivariate logistic regression analysis proved that the higher VBQ score (odds ratio[OR] = 13.563, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.968 - 37.031, p < 0.001) was the only variable that significantly predicted subsidence. Using a VBQ score cutoff value of 3.445, the cervical VBQ score yielded a sensitivity of 69.6% and a specificity of 85.2% with an AUC of 0.810 to differentiate patients with subsidence and with no subsidence.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative higher cervical VBQ score is an independent risk factor for TMC subsidence after ACCF. The cervical VBQ score may be a valuable tool for assisting in distinguishing the presence of TMC subsidence.

Anterior direct decompression significantly relieves spinal cord high signal in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

In patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, high cord signal (HCS) is frequently observed. However, limited research has investigated the variations in HCS improvement resulting from different surgical approaches. This study aims to explore the potential relationship between the choice of surgical approach and the postoperative improvement of intramedullary high signal in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) patients.

METHODS

We extensively reviewed the patients' medical records, based on which demographic information such as gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded, and assessed the severity of the patients' neurological status preoperatively and postoperatively by using the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOAs), focusing on consecutive preoperative and postoperative Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2WI measurements, to study the statistical correlation between the improvement of HCS and the choice of surgical approach.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographic, imaging parameters, and clinical symptoms between patients undergoing anterior and posterior surgery (p > 0.05, Table 1). However, both improvement in JOAs (Recovery2) and improvement in HCS (CR2) were significantly better in the anterior surgery group two years after surgery (p < 0.05, Table 1). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis revealed that posterior surgery and higher preoperative signal change ratio (SCR) were identified as risk factors for poor HCS improvement at the two-year postoperative period (p < 0.05, Table 2). Table 1 Differences in demographic, imaging parameters, and clinical symptoms in patients with anterior and posterior approach Anterior approach Posterior approach P-Values Demographic data  Sex (male/female) 10/12 6/17 0.175  Age 58.59 ± 5.68 61.43 ± 9.04 0.215  Hypertension 14/8 14/9 0.848  Diabetes 16/6 19/4 0.425  BMI 25.58 ± 4.72 26.95 ± 4.58 0.331  Smoking history 19/3 16/7 0.175 Preoperative measured imaging parameters  Preoperative SCR 1.615 ± 0.369 1.668 ± 0.356 0.623  CR1 0.106 ± 0.125 0.011 ± 0.246 0.08  CNR 0.33 ± 0.073 0.368 ± 0.096 0.15  C2-7 Cobb angle 8.977 ± 10.818 13.862 ± 13.191 0.182  SVA 15.212 ± 8.024 17.46 ± 8.91 0.38  mK-line INT 3.694 ± 3.291 4.527 ± 2.227 0.323 Imaging follow-up  6 months postoperative SCR 1.45 ± 0.44 1.63 ± 0.397 0.149  2 years postoperative SCR 1.26 ± 0.19 1.65 ± 0.35 0.000**  CR2 0.219 ± 0.14 - 0.012 ± 0.237 0.000** Clinical symptoms  Preoperative JOAs 10.64 ± 1.59 10.83 ± 1.47 0.679  6 months postoperative JOAs 11.82 ± 1.37 11.65 ± 1.4 0.69  2 years postoperative JOAs 14.18 ± 1.01 12.52 ± 2.06 0.001**  Recovery1 0.181 ± 0.109 0.128 ± 0.154 0.189  Recovery2 0.536 ± 0.178 0.278 ± 0.307 0.001** *, statistical significance (p < 0.05). **, statistical significance (p < 0.01) BMI = body mass index. SCR = the signal change ratio between the localized high signal and normal spinal cord signal at the C7-T1 levels. CR1 = the regression of high cord signals at 6 months postoperatively (i.e., CR1 = (Preoperative SCR-SCR at 6 months postoperatively)/ Preoperative SCR). CR2 = the regression of high cord signal at 2 years postoperatively (i.e., CR2 = (Preoperative SCR-SCR at 2 years postoperatively)/ Preoperative SCR). CNR = canal narrowing ratio. SVA = sagittal vertical axis. mK-line INT = modified K-line interval. JOAs = Japanese Orthopedic Association score. Recovery1 = degree of JOAs recovery at 6 months postoperatively (i.e., Recover1 = (JOAs at 6 months postoperatively-Preoperative JOAs)/ (17- Preoperative JOAs)). Recovery2 = degree of JOAs recovery at 2 years postoperatively (i.e., Recover2 = (JOAs at 2 years postoperatively-Preoperative JOAs)/ (17-Preoperative JOAs)) Table 2 Linear regression analyses for lower CR2 values 95% CI P value Uni-variable analyses Demographic data  Sex (male/female) - 0.01 0.221 0.924  Age - 0.015 0.003 0.195  Hypertension - 0.071 0.204 0.334  Diabetes - 0.195 0.135 0.716  BMI - 0.375 0.422 0.905  Smoking history - 0.249 0.077 0.295  Surgical approach - 0.349 - 0.113 0.000# Preoperative measured imaging parameters  C2-7 Cobb angle - 0.009 0.002 0.185  SVA - 0.008 0.008 0.995  mK-line INT - 0.043 0.005 0.122  Preoperative SCR 0.092 0.445 0.004#  CR1 0.156 0.784 0.004#  CNR - 0.76 0.844 0.918 Multi-variable analyses  Surgical approach - 0.321 - 0.118 0.000**  Preoperative SCR 0.127 0.41 0.000**  CR1 - 0.018 0.501 0.067 #, variables that achieved a significance level of p < 0.1 in the univariate analysis *statistical significance (p < 0.05). **statistical significance (p < 0.01) BMI = body mass index. SCR = the signal change ratio between the localized high signal and normal spinal cord signal at the C7-T1 levels. CR1 = the regression of high cord signals at 6 months postoperatively (i.e., CR1 = (Preoperative SCR-SCR at 6 months postoperatively)/ Preoperative SCR). CR2 = the regression of high cord signal at 2 years postoperatively (i.e., CR2 = (Preoperative SCR-SCR at 2 years postoperatively)/ Preoperative SCR). CNR = canal narrowing ratio. SVA = sagittal vertical axis. mK-line INT = modified K-line interval CONCLUSIONS: For patients with OPLL-induced cervical spondylotic myelopathy and intramedullary high signal, anterior removal of the ossified posterior longitudinal ligament and direct decompression offer a greater potential for regression of intramedullary high signal. At the same time, this anterior surgical strategy improves clinical neurologic function better than indirect decompression in the posterior approach.

The Deterioration of Cervical Kyphosis During Neck Flexion after Laminoplasty Affects the Surgical Outcome of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective single-center study.

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated whether postoperative cervical alignment changes, in addition to preoperative patient backgrounds, imaging parameters, and disease severity, affect outcomes 1 year after laminoplasty.

METHODS

One hundred and three cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients who underwent laminoplasty were enrolled. Preoperative and postoperative (1-year) Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, cervical alignment, and balance on X-rays were assessed. Patients were classified into 2 groups for a univariate analysis according to the status of the recovery rate (RR) of the JOA score ≥50%. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with good surgical outcomes a.

RESULTS

The mean RR of the JOA score was 47.5% and the loss of cervical lordosis in the neutral position was 5.5°. The univariate analysis revealed slight differences in age, sex, and the duration of disease. Preoperative C2-7 angles were not significantly different. The C2-7 angle during flexion after surgery was significantly smaller in Group F. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, significant factors associated with the status of RR≥50% were a younger age (OR: .75, 95%CI: .59-.96), shorter duration of disease (OR: .94, 95%CI: .89-.99), and a lordotic C2-7 angle during neck flexion after surgery (OR: 1.47, 95%CI: 1.1-1.95).

CONCLUSION

We retrospectively assessed the surgical outcomes of laminoplasty in 103 CSM cases. In addition to an older age and longer duration of disease, postoperative deteriorations in cervical kyphosis during neck flexion had a negative impact on outcomes.

The use of a new high-speed shielded curved drill is associated with improved intraoperative and clinical outcomes after cervical corpectomy and fusion procedures: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) is an effective technique to address multi-level degenerative cervical myelopathy. However, as the number of surgical levels increases, the outcomes worsen with respect to complication rates, range of motion and length of surgery. This study aimed to determine the clinical outcome of ACCF procedures performed using a new distally curved and shielded drilling device.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 43 ACCF procedures in which the device was used for osteophyte removal. Patient files were reviewed to assess the early clinical results and complications following ACCF. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using patient neck and arm pain scores and SF-36 questionnaires. Hospitalization characteristics were compared with historical controls.

RESULTS

All procedures were uneventful and without major complications or neurological deterioration. Single-level ACCF procedures required an average of 71 min and followed by an average hospitalization of 3.3 days. Osteophyte removal, verified by intraoperative imaging, was satisfactory. Average neck pain score was improved by 0.9 points (p = 0.24). Average arm pain score was improved by 1.8 points (p = 0.06). SF-36 scores were improved in all domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The new curved device enabled safe and efficient removal of osteophytes sparing adjacent vertebral removal in ACCF procedures, thus improving the clinical outcome.

Posterior Hybrid Technique for the Treatment of Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury with High Signal Intensity on T2WI

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of the posterior hybrid technique (PHT) for the treatment of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without vertebral fracture or dislocation with high signal intensity on T2WI (CSCIH).

Methods

A comparative analysis of clinical efficacy between CSCIH patients who underwent anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) surgery and those who underwent PHT surgery was retrospectively conducted. Demographic characteristics, cervical range of motion (CRM), cross-sectional area of spinal cord (CSASC), spinal canal area residual rate (SCARR), high signal intensity ratio (HSIR), Cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association (CJOA) score, and neck disability index (NDI) were assessed.

Results

Forty-three CSCIH cases with PHT and 46 CSCIH cases with ADF were collected from January 2013 to January 2017. The CRM in patients with PHT was superior to that in patients with ADF at the final follow-up (64.21 ± 18.46° vs. 48.71 ± 19.34°, p = 0.0002). The SCARR also showed greater improvements in the PHT group than in the ADF group (final follow-up: 93.54 ± 11.09% vs. 88.13 ± 10.84%, p = 0.022). Both groups indicated significant improvements in the CSASC and HSIR (p < 0.05); however, no significant differences were observed between the two groups. All patients showed improvements in the CJOA score and the NDI after surgery (p < 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, the ADF group had better NDI scores than the PHT group (31.17 ± 10.42 vs. 36.78 ± 9.65, p = 0.010), whereas the PHT group exhibited better improvements than the ADF group at the final follow-up (66.86 ± 9.28% vs. 57.67 ± 10.22%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The PHT was as effective as ADF in the treatment of CSCIH, whereas the PHT was superior in the improvement of patients' health-related quality of life and in CRM preservation during the long-term follow-up.

Nationwide sample data analysis of additional surgery rate after anterior or posterior cervical spinal surgery

Surgical outcomes of degenerative cervical spinal disease are dependent on the selection of surgical techniques. Although a standardized decision cannot be made in an actual clinical setting, continued education is provided to standardize the medical practice among surgeons. Therefore, it is necessary to supervise and regularly update overall surgical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the rate of additional surgery between anterior and posterior surgeries for degenerative cervical spinal disease using the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) nationwide patient database. The NHIS-NSC is a population-based cohort with about a million participants. This retrospective cohort study included 741 adult patients (> 18 years) who underwent their first cervical spinal surgery for degenerative cervical spinal disease. The median follow-up period was 7.3 years. An event was defined as the registration of any type of cervical spinal surgery during the follow-up period. Event-free survival analysis was used for outcome analysis, and the following factors were used as covariates for adjustment: location of disease, sex, age, type of insurance, disability, type of hospital, Charles comorbidity Index, and osteoporosis. Anterior cervical surgery was selected for 75.0% of the patients, and posterior cervical surgery for the remaining 25.0%. Cervical radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, hard disc, or soft disc was the primary diagnosis in 78.0% of the patients, and central spinal stenosis was the primary diagnosis in 22.0% of them. Additional surgery was performed for 5.0% of the patients after anterior cervical surgery and 6.5% of the patients after posterior cervical surgery (adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.74). The rates of additional surgery were not different between anterior and posterior cervical surgeries. The results would be helpful in evaluating current practice as a whole and adjusting the health insurance policy.

Post-operative dysphagia following ventral cervical approach: complication or side-effect? Retrospective analysis and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To ameliorate the clinical decision-making process when debating between a ventral or dorsal cervical approach by elucidating whether post-operative dysphagia be regarded as a complication or a transient side effect.

METHODS

A literature review of studies comparing complication rates following ventral and dorsal cervical approaches was performed. A stratified complication rate excluding dysphagia was calculated and discussed. A retrospective cohort of patients operated for degenerative cervical myelopathy in a single institution comprising 665 patients was utilized to analyze complication rates using a uniform definition for dysphagia.

RESULTS

Both the ventral and the dorsal approach groups exhibited comparable neurological improvement rates. Since transient dysphagia was not considered a complication, the dorsal approach was associated with higher level of overall complications.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Inconsistencies in the definition of dysphagia following ventral cervical surgery impedes the interpretation of trials comparing dorsal and ventral complication rates. A uniform definition for complications and side effects may enhance the validity of medical trials.

Influence of preoperative depression on clinical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: A retrospective study

Background

Depression is a highly prevalent mental disorder, and we found that patients with preoperative depression had worse postoperative improvement in lumbar fusion. Are mental factors related to the prognosis of laminoplasty?

Objective

To analyze the relationship between depression and clinical outcomes after laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel CSM.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 115 patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), who underwent laminoplasty and were followed up for more than 1 year, were enrolled in this study from October 2018 to October 2021. Patients with the scores of 21-item Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) ≥ 15 or Hamilton Depression Scale-24 (HAMD-24) > 20 were included in the depression group. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the changes and recovery rate (RR) of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (JOA) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) respectively. Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to reveal the relationship between preoperative depressive states and clinical outcomes.

Results

Fourteen patients were diagnosed with depression by BDI and twenty-nine by HAMD-24. Between the depression group and the non-depression group, the age, gender, smoking history, and duration of symptoms were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression showed that the BDI scores had a negative relationship with the changes and RR of JOA and NDI, and the HAMD-24 scores had a negative relationship with the changes and RR of JOA.

Conclusions

Preoperative depression in patients with multilevel CSM can lead to worse prognosis. In order to improve the curative effect of the operation, we should pay attention to the psychological state monitoring and intervention of patients before they receive laminoplasty.

Impact of the K-line in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Analysis of sagittal cervical curvature changes and surgical outcomes

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the relationship of the K-line with sagittal cervical curvature changes and surgical outcomes in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 84 patients with OPLL who underwent posterior cervical single-door laminoplasty. The patients were divided into a K-line-positive (+) group and a K-line-negative (-) group. Perioperative data, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

Of 84 total patients, 50 patients were in the K (+) group and 29 patients were in the K (-) group. Neurological function improved in both groups after laminoplasty. The C2-7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis were significantly changed in the K(-) group compared with those in the K (+) group before the operation and at the 3-month and final follow-ups.

Conclusion

Neurological function was recovered in both groups, and the clinical effect on the K (+) group was better than that on the K (-) group. The cervical curvature in patients with OPLL tends to be anteverted and kyphotic after laminoplasty and is an important factor in reducing the clinical effect.

Factors affecting titanium mesh cage subsidence in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

PURPOSE

To analyze risk factors of titanium mesh cage (TMC) subsidence in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

TMC subsidence is defined as the reduction of the adjacent vertebral bodies by ≥ 2 mm. Patients with cervical OPLL who were treated with single-level ACCF between January 2019 and May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed in two groups: patients with TMC subsidence as Group S and patients with no TMC subsidence as Group N during the one-year follow-up period. The degree of distraction of surgical segment and correction of the cervical curvature was measured to analyze their relationship with TMC subsidence.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were included in Group S, and 138 patients were included in Group N. There was no significant difference in patient demographics and complications between the two groups. The degree of distraction in Group S was significantly higher than that in Group N (11.4% ± 7.6% vs. 4.7% ± 9.7%, P < 0.01). The change of C2 to C7 Cobb angle (α) in Group S was significantly greater than that in Group N (5.7 ± 2.7 vs. 1.4 ± 4.7, P < 0.01), and the change of interspinous process distance (SPD) in Group S was also significantly greater than that in Group N (7.0 ± 4.2 vs. 4.1 ± 2.7, P < 0.01). The JOA score and JOA recovery rate were not statistically different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative selection of overlength TMC in single-level ACCF for OPLL, over-distraction and excessive correction of the cervical curvature may cause TMC subsidence after surgery. No significant impact of TMC subsidence on the surgical outcome was observed during the 1-year follow-up period.

Relationship between spinocranial angle and clinical outcomes after laminoplasty in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

Background

The aims of this study were to identify the relationship between the spinocranial angle (SCA) and clinical outcomes and to explore whether the SCA is a suitable indicator to predict clinical outcomes for patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

Methods

Sixty-five patients with cervical OPLL who underwent laminoplasty with at least 24 months of follow-up were selected for the current study and were divided into two groups according to whether the SCA was greater than or less than the mean preoperative SCA. Sagittal alignment changes were compared between the groups. The Pearson correlation coefficient was applied to assess the relationship among sagittal parameters. Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were applied to identify the relationship between the recovery rate (RR) and radiological parameters.

Results

Patients were classified into two groups based on the mean value of preoperative SCA (85.1°). SCA was negatively correlated with T1 slope (T1s) and cervical lordosis (CL) and positively correlated with the C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) (p &lt; 0.001). Patients with lower SCA had larger T1s and CL preoperatively and at the follow-up (T1s: p &lt; 0.001; CL: p &lt; 0.001) and showed greater loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty (p &lt; 0.001). However, no significant differences in the incidence of kyphosis, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) or RR were noted between the two groups. Although Pre-SCA, Pre-CL, F/U-CL and Pre-T1sCL were significantly associated with RR, these indicators were not associated with RR in the multivariate regression analysis.

Conclusion

Patients with lower SCA tended to have higher T1s and CL before surgery and greater loss of cervical lordosis at the follow-up visit but still maintained a greater lordosis angle. Although preoperative SCA is significantly related to RR, the relationship is not sufficient to indicate that preoperative SCA can be used to predict clinical outcomes. Therefore, further research is needed to confirm the impact of SCA on clinical outcomes for OPLL.

A comparative study of surgical outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and selective laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BACKGROUND

Few studies have directly compared anterior and posterior surgical approaches in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients with short-segment disease. We aimed to examine and compare surgical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) and selective laminoplasty (S-LAMP) in CSM patients with 1- or 2-level disease.

METHODS

Forty-six patients, who received surgeries for CSM, were prospectively investigated; 24 underwent ACDF and 22 underwent S-LAMP. Average follow-up was 3.5 years. The following pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements were recorded: (1) C2-7 angle, (2) local angle (lordotic Cobb angle at operative level), (3) cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (center of gravity of the head-C7 SVA), and (4) C7 slope. Outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score), neck pain visual analog scale, and neck disability index (NDI).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups. Postoperatively, C2-7 angle, local angle, cervical SVA, C7 slope, C-JOA score, and neck pain and NDI scores were not significantly different between the two groups; however, the recovery rate of the C-JOA score was superior in the ACDF group (57.5%) compared to the S-LAMP group (42.1%). The recovery rate of the C-JOA score in the local lordosis subgroup (local angle ≥ 0°) showed no significant difference between the two surgical groups. However, in the local kyphosis subgroup (local angle < 0°), C-JOA score recovery rate was worse after S-LAMP (20.4%) than ACDF (57.9%); local angle also worsened postoperatively after S-LAMP.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with local lordosis at the segments of cervical spondylosis and spinal cord compression, S-LAMP showed equivalent surgical outcomes (neurological recovery, neck pain and NDI scores, and cervical alignment) to ACDF. However, in patients with local kyphosis, S-LAMP worsened the kyphosis and resulted in worse neurological recovery.

Significance of Vertebral Body Sliding Osteotomy as a Surgical Strategy for the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO) has previously been reported as a technique to decompress ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) by translating the vertebral body anteriorly. This study aimed to evaluate the radiological and clinical efficacies of VBSO and clarify the surgical indications of VBSO for treating myelopathy caused by OPLL.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with symptomatic OPLL-induced cervical myelopathy treated with VBSO or laminoplasty who were followed up for more than 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical alignment, range of motion, fusion, modified K-line (mK-line) status, and minimum interval between ossified mass and mK-line (INT_(min)), and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were assessed. Patients in the VBSO group were compared with those who underwent laminoplasty.

RESULTS

Cervical lordosis and INT_(min) significantly increased in the VBSO group. All patients in the VBSO group assessed as mK-line (-) preoperatively were assessed as mK-line (+) postoperatively. However, in the LMP group, the mK-line status changed from (+) preoperatively to (-) postoperatively in 3 patients. Final JOA score (p = 0.02) and JOA score improvement (p = 0.01) were significantly higher in the VBSO group. JOA recovery ratio (p = 0.03) and proportion of patients with a recovery rate ≥50% were significantly higher in the VBSO group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

VBSO is an effective surgical option for OPLL-induced myelopathy, demonstrating favorable neurological recovery and lordosis restoration with low complication rates. It is best indicated for kyphotic alignment, OPLL with a high space-occupying ratio, and OPLL involving ≤3 segments.

A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatments for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term outcomes for Laminoplasty, Laminectomy/fusion, and ACDF.

METHODS

We utilized a prospectively-collected, multi-center national database with a propensity score matching algorithm to compare the short-term outcomes for laminoplasty, laminectomy/fusion, and multi-level (>3) ACDF (with and without corpectomy). Bivariate analyses involved both chi-square/fisher exact test and t-test/ANOVA on perioperative factors. Multivariate analyses were performed to determined independent risk factors for short term outcomes.

RESULTS

546 patients remained after propensity score matching, with 182 patients in each cohort. ACDF required the longest operative time 188 ± 79 versus laminectomy/fusion (169 ± 75, p = 0.017), and laminoplasty (167 ± 66, p = 0.004). ACDF required the shortest hospital stay (LOS ≥ 2: ACDF 56.6%, laminoplasty 89.6%, laminectomy/fusion 93.4%, p < 0.05). ACDF had lower overall complications (ACDF 3.9%, laminoplasty 7.7%, laminectomy/fusion 11.5%, p < 0.05), mortality (ACDF 0%, laminoplasty 0.55%, laminectomy/fusion 2.2%, p < 0.05), and unplanned readmissions (ACDF 4.4%, laminoplasty 4.4%, laminectomy/fusion 9.9%, p < 0.05). No significant differences were seen in the other outcomes including DVT/PT, acute renal failure, UTI, stroke, cardiac complications, or sepsis. In the multivariate analysis, laminectomy/fusion (OR 17, reference: ACDF) and laminoplasty (OR10, reference: ACDF) were strong independent risk factors for LOS ≥ 2 days. Laminectomy/fusion (OR 3.2, reference: ACDF) was an independent predictor for any adverse events 30-days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Laminectomy/fusion carries the highest risk for morbidity, mortality, and unplanned readmissions in the short-term postoperative period. Laminoplasty and ACDF cases carry similar short-term complications risks. ACDF is significantly associated with the longest operative duration and shortest LOS without an increase in individual or overall complications, readmissions, or reoperations.

Instrumented fusion versus instrumented non-fusion following expansive open-door laminoplasty for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty with instrumented fusion (ELIF) and expansive open-door laminoplasty with instrumented non-fusion (ELINF) for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

Patients who underwent ELIF or ELINF due to multilevel cervical OPLL from June 2013 to June 2019 were identified. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were enrolled in this study with a minimum follow-up of 24 months, including 42 patients in the ELIF group and 36 patients in the ELINF group. At the final follow-up, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and C2-C7 Cobb angle in the ELIF group were significantly better than those in the ELINF group, and cervical range of movement (ROM) in the ELIF group decreased significantly than that in the ELINF group. The incidence of OPLL progression at the final follow-up was 4.76% (2/42) in the ELIF group and 27.78% (10/36) in the ELINF group. Postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) score improved significantly in each group, but JOA score and recovery rate (RR) in the ELIF group were significantly better than those in the ELINF group at the final follow-up. When K-line was positive, the difference in the final JOA score between the two groups was not significant, but the RR in the ELIF group was significantly better than that in the ELINF group. When K-line was negative, the final JOA score and RR in the ELIF group were significant higher than those in the ELINF group.

CONCLUSIONS

ELIF and ELINF were two effective surgical procedures for treating multilevel cervical OPLL. However, ELIF was superior to ELINF due to better postoperative JOA score and RR, significant improvement of C2-C7 Cobb angle and maintenance of SVA, and suppressant effect on OPLL progression, especially for patients with K-line ( - ) OPLL.

Quality assessment of systematic reviews of surgical treatment of cervical spine degenerative diseases: an overview

OBJECTIVE

To gather all systematic reviews of surgical treatment of degenerative cervical diseases and assess their quality, conclusions and outcomes.

METHODS

A literature search for systematic reviews of surgical treatment of degenerative cervical diseases was conducted. Studies should have at least one surgical procedure as an intervention. Included studies were assessed for quality through Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) questionnaires. Quality of studies was rated accordingly to their final score as very poor (<30%), poor (30%-50%), fair (50%-70%), good (70%-90%), and excellent (>90%). If an article reported a conclusion addressing its primary objective with supportive statistical evidence for it, they were deemed to have an evidence-based conclusion.

RESULTS

A total of 65 systematic reviews were included. According to AMSTAR and PRISMA, 1.5% to 6.2% of studies were rated as excellent, while good studies counted for 21.5% to 47.7%. According to AMSTAR, most studies were of fair quality (46.2%), and 6.2% of very poor quality. Mean PRISMA score was 70.2%, meaning studies of good quality. For both tools, performing a meta-analysis significantly increased studies scores and quality. Cervical spondylosis studies reached highest scores among diseases analyzed. Authors stated conclusions for interventions compared in 70.7% of studies, and only two of them were not supported by statistical evidence.

CONCLUSION

Systematic reviews of surgical treatment of cervical degenerative diseases present "fair" to "good" quality in their majority, and most of the reported conclusions are supported by statistical evidence. Including a meta-analysis significantly increases the quality of a systematic review.

Efficacy and safety of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) through mini-incision and posterior laminoplasty (LAMP) for treatment of long-level cervical spondylosis: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) through mini-incision and posterior laminoplasty for long-level cervical spondylosis were investigated.

METHOD

From January 2018 to September 2019, clinical patients data with 3-4 segments (C3-7) cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, cervical spondylotic myelopathy, or mixed cervical spondylosis who received ACDF (42 cases) throughwith mini-incision or LAMP (36 cases) treatment were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The operative time, bleeding volume, incisive length, and hospital stay were recorded. Moreover, the intervertebral height, functional segment height, cervical lordosis, cervical hyperextension and hyperflexion range-of-motion (ROM) and ROM in all directions of the cervical spine before and after the operation were measured. Additionally, all relevant postoperative complications were also recorded. Then, the therapeutic effects of both surgical methods were investigated.

RESULTS

Patients in the ACDF group had less bleeding, shorter incision, and fewer hospitalization days than the LAMP group. There was no significant difference in JOA, VAS score of the upper limb, NDI score after surgery between two groups. Postoperative intervertebral height and functional segment height in the ACDF group were significantly higher than those before the operation, and postoperative functional segment height of the ACDF group was significantly higher than that of the LAMP group. Moreover, the postoperative cervical lordosis angle in the ACDF group was significantly larger than the LAMP group. There was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative ROM in all directions of the cervical spine for the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ACDF through mini-incision and LAMP are effective treatments for long-level cervical spondylosis. However, ACDF through mini-incision shows minor trauma, less bleeding, fast recovery, and it is beneficial for cervical lordosis reconstruction.

Postoperative progression of ligamentum flavum ossification after posterior instrumented surgery for thoracic posterior longitudinal ligament ossification: long-term outcomes during a minimum 10-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to investigate clinical and radiological outcomes after thoracic posterior fusion surgery during a minimum of 10 years of follow-up, including postoperative progression of ossification, in patients with thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL).

METHODS

The study participants were 34 consecutive patients (15 men, 19 women) with an average age at surgery of 53.6 years (range 36-80 years) who underwent posterior decompression and fusion surgery with instrumentation at the authors' hospital. The minimum follow-up period was 10 years. Estimated blood loss, operative time, pre- and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, and JOA score recovery rates were investigated. Dekyphotic changes were evaluated on plain radiographs of thoracic kyphotic angles and fusion levels pre- and postoperatively and 10 years after surgery. The distal junctional angle (DJA) was measured preoperatively and at 10 years after surgery to evaluate distal junctional kyphosis (DJK). Ossification progression at distal intervertebrae was investigated on CT.

RESULTS

The Cobb angles at T1-12 were 46.8°, 38.7°, and 42.6°, and those at the fusion level were 39.6°, 31.1°, and 34.1° pre- and postoperatively and at 10 years after surgery, respectively. The changes in the kyphotic angles from pre- to postoperatively and to 10 years after surgery were 8.0° and 7.2° at T1-12 and 8.4° and 7.9° at the fusion level, respectively. The DJA changed from 4.5° postoperatively to 10.9° at 10 years after surgery. There were 11 patients (32.3%) with DJK during follow-up, including 4 (11.8%) with vertebral compression fractures at lower instrumented vertebrae or adjacent vertebrae. Progression of ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) on the caudal side occurred in 8 cases (23.6%), but none had ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) progression. Cases with OLF progression had a significantly lower rate of DJK (0% vs 38.5%, p < 0.01), a lower DJA (3.4° vs 13.2°, p < 0.01), and a smaller change in DJA at 10 years after surgery (0.8° vs 8.1°, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior decompression and fusion surgery with instrumentation for T-OPLL was found to be a relatively safe and stable surgical procedure based on the long-term outcomes. Progression of OLF on the caudal side occurred in 23.6% of cases, but cases with OLF progression did not have DJK. Progression of DJK shifts the load in the spinal canal forward and the load on the ligamentum flavum is decreased. This may explain the lack of ossification in cases with DJK.

Treatment of cervical myelopathy by posterior approach: Laminoplasty vs. laminectomy with posterior fixation, are there differences from a clinical and radiological point of view?

INTRODUCTION

Cervical degenerative myelopathy is a variable and progressive degenerative disease caused by chronic compression of the spinal cord. Surgical approaches for the cervical spine can be performed anteriorly and/or posteriorly. Regarding the posterior approach, there are 2 fundamental techniques: laminoplasty and laminectomy with posterior fixation (LPF). There is still controversy concerning the technique in terms of outcome and complications. The aim of the present work is to analyze from the clinical and radiological point of view these 2 techniques: laminoplasty and LPF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A historical cohort of 39 patients was reviewed (12 LFP and 27 laminoplasty) including patients operated in a 10 years period at the Hospital Universitario La Paz with a follow-up of 12 months after surgery was carried out. The clinical results were analyzed and compared using the Nurick scale and the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale (mJOA) and the radiological results using the Cobb angle, Sagittal Vertical Axis, T1 Slope and alignment (measured by Cobb-T1 Sloppe).

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed in the postoperative improvement of the Nurick scale (p = 0.008) and mJOA (p = 0.018) in the laminoplasty group. In LFP there is a tendency to a greater improvement, but statistical significance is not reached due to the low sample size of this group. No statistically significant differences were observed in the radiological variables. Regarding the total number of complications, a higher number was observed in the laminoplasty group (7 cases) versus LFP (one case), but no statistically significant differences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Laminoplasty and LFP are both safe and effective procedures in the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. The findings of our study demonstrate statistically significant clinical improvement based on the Nurick and mJOA scales with laminoplasty. No significant differences in terms of complications or radiological variables were observed between the 2 techniques.

The Effect of Laminectomy with Instrumented Fusion Carried into the Thoracic Spine on the Sagittal Imbalance in Patients with Multilevel Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a difference in either the cervical alignment or the clinical outcomes in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) patients who underwent laminectomy with instrumented fusion (LIF) ending at C₆ , C₇ , or proximal thoracic spine for the treatment of multilevel OPLL, and to find out the appropriate distal fusion level.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study. In total, 36 patients with cervical OPLL who underwent three or more level LIF in our institution between January 2015 and January 2017 were enrolled. They were divided into three groups according to their distal ends: C₆ (nine females and 11 males, 60.45 ± 9.68 years old), C₇ (four females and six males, 61.60 ± 10.29 years old), and T-group (two females and four males, 64.33 ± 8.12 years old). Radiographic (compression level, classification of OPLL, occupying rate, C_2-7 cobb angle, C_2-7 sagittal vertical axis, and fusion level) and clinical outcomes (NDI score, operative time, and blood loss) were compared. Predictors of postoperative sagittal imbalance were also identified according to if the postoperative C_2-7 SVA was greater than 40 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of preoperative parameters predicting postoperative cervical stability were evaluated via the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up at least 1 year. The blood loss in T group was significantly more than C₆ or C₇ group. The length of fusion level became significantly longer when the caudal level extended to the thoracic spine. The age, preoperative SVA, and NDI score at follow-up were significantly greater in the imbalance group. At the final follow-up, the cervical lordosis tended to be straight and the C_2-7 SVA tended to be greater when the caudal level of fusion was extended to upper thoracic segment. Further ROC curve analysis suggested that patients' age had a sensitivity of 75.00%, specificity of 79.17% for cervical stability, and the AUC was 0.844 (P < 0.01), with the cutoff value for age being 66.5 years old. For preoperative SVA, the sensitivity was 58.30%, and specificity was 91.70%, with the AUC of 0.778 (P < 0.01). The cutoff value for preoperative SVA was 30.4 mm.

CONCLUSION

Although posterior fusion terminating in the thoracic spine was not superior to the cervical spine for patients with multilevel OPLL, for elderly patients (>67 years) with great preoperative SVA (>30 mm), terminating at C₆ was recommended to limit the invasion of cervical extensor muscles, provided the decompression was adequate.

Comparison of Interventions for Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the literature and systematically evaluate outcomes for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament interventions including anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF), laminoplasty (LP), and laminectomy with fusion (LF).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1990 to March 2021. Patient demographic data, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, cervical lordosis and overall complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

We evaluated 30 studies involving 2038 patients. Patients undergoing ACCF had improved Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores compared with patients undergoing LP (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.85) and LF (WMD 1.21, 95% CI 0.17-2.24). Patients with ACAF had better cervical lordosis compared with patients with ACCF (WMD 7.00, 95% CI 0.72-13.27), LP (WMD 10.27, 95% CI 4.64-15.90), and LF (WMD 8.98, 95% CI 2.48-15.47). Additionally, ACAF (odds ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.84) and LP (odds ratio 0.50, 95% CI 0.28-0.90) had a lower incidence of complications compared with ACCF.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese Orthopaedic Association score outcomes indicated that ACCF was superior to LP and LF. ACAF had the largest cervical lordosis among all procedures. ACCF showed a higher incidence of overall complications compared with ACAF and LP.

Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) vs Posterior Laminoplasty for Multilevel Severe Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Retrospective Study Based on a Two-Year Follow-up

Objectives

To compare the clinical outcomes of anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (ACAF), a new surgical technique, with laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) based on a 2‐year follow‐up.

Methods

Clinical data of 53 patients (21 by ACAF and 32 by laminoplasty) who have accepted surgery for treatment of cervical myelopathy caused by multilevel severe OPLL (occupying rate ≥ 50%) from March 2015 to March 2017 were retrospectively reviewed and compared between ACAF group and laminoplasty group. Operative time, blood loss, and complications of the two groups were recorded. Radiographic parameters were evaluated pre‐ and postoperatively: cervical lordosis on X‐ray, space available for the cord (SAC) and the occupying ratio (OR) on computed tomography (CT), and the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the spinal cord at the narrowest level and the spinal cord curvature on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring was used to evaluate neurologic recovery. Statistical analysis was conducted to analyze the differences between two groups. The Mann–Whitney U test and chi square test were used to compare categorical variables. unpaired t test was used to compare continuous data.

Results

All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. The operative time was longer in ACAF group (286.5 vs 178.2 min, P < 0.05). The blood loss showed no significant difference (291.6 vs 318.3 mL, P > 0.05). Less complications were observed in ACAF group than in laminoplasty group (one case [4.7%] of C5 palsy and one case [4.7%] of cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] leakage in ACAF group; four cases [12.5%] of C5 palsy, two cases [6.3%] of CSF leakage, and four cases [12.5%] of axial symptoms in laminoplasty group). The mean JOA score at last follow‐up (14.6 vs 12.8, P < 0.05) and the improvement rate (IR) (63.8% vs 47.8%, P < 0.05) in ACAF group were superior to those in laminoplasty group significantly. The postoperative OR (16.7% vs 40.9%, P < 0.05), SAC (150.8 vs 110.5 mm², P < 0.05), AP spinal cord diameter (5.5 vs 4.2 mm, P < 0.05), and cervical lordosis (12.7° vs 4.7°, P < 0.05) were improved more considerably in ACAF group, with significant differences between two groups. Notably, the spinal cord on MRI showed a better curvature in ACAF group.

Conclusions

This study showed that ACAF is considered superior to laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel severe OPLL as anterior direct decompression and better curvature of the spinal cord led to satisfactory neurologic outcomes and low complication rate.

Comparison of the anterior and posterior approach in treating four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes and complications between the anterior and posterior approaches for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

METHODS

A total of 19 patients underwent anterior decompression and fusion and 25 patients underwent posterior laminoplasty and instrumentation in this study. Perioperative information, intraoperative blood loss, clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications were recorded. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, 36-item short form survey (SF-36) score and cervical alignment were assessed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in JOA scores between the anterior and posterior group preoperatively (11.6 ± 1.6 vs. 12.1 ± 1.5), immediately postoperatively (14.4 ± 1.1 vs. 13.8 ± 1.3), or at the last follow-up (14.6 ± 1.0 vs. 14.2 ± 1.1) (P > 0.05). The JOA scores significantly improved immediately postoperatively and at the last follow-up in both groups compared with their preoperative values. The recovery rate was significantly higher in the anterior group both immediately postoperatively and at the last follow-up. The SF-36 score was significantly higher in the anterior group at the last follow-up compared with the preoperative value (69.4 vs. 61.7). Imaging revealed that there was no significant difference in the Cobb angle at C2-C7 between the two groups preoperatively (-2.0° ± 7.3° vs. -1.4° ± 7.5°). The Cobb angle significantly improved immediately postoperatively (12.3° ± 4.2° vs. 9.2° ± 3.6°) and at the last follow-up (12.4° ± 3.5° vs. 9.0° ± 2.6°) in both groups compared with their preoperative values (P = 0.00). Three patients had temporary dysphagia in the anterior group and four patients had persistent axial symptoms in the posterior group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the anterior and posterior approaches were effective in treating four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy in terms of neurological clinical outcomes and radiological features. However, the JOA score recovery rate and SF-36 score in the anterior group were significantly higher. Persistent axial pain could be a major concern when undertaking the posterior approach.

Klippel–Feil Syndrome with Multiple Cervical Anomalies Discovered Following Trauma

The approach to the upper cervical spine is a challenge for surgeons, not only for its complex anatomy but also for the great variety of pathologies. Klippel–Feil syndrome (KFS) is a congenital disease characterized by the fusion of two or more cervical segments and is associated with various musculoskeletal and vascular malformations. However, there is no consensus on the type of surgery, approach, level of fixation or fusion. We report the case of a KFS, associated with multiple anatomical variants, who suffered a traumatic cervical injury and underwent surgical treatment.

Ultrasonic osteotome versus high-speed burr in cervical anterior vertebral subtotal resection: A retrospective study of 81 cases

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of ultrasonic osteotome in cervical anterior vertebral subtotal resection.

METHODS

Retrospective clinical data were collated for 81 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who required cervical anterior vertebral subtotal resection.

RESULTS

Group A (n=40) was treated with an ultrasonic osteotome and group B (n=41) with a high-speed burr. Vertebrectomy time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical complications, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and JOA score improvement were compared. Group A showed significantly shorter vertebrectomy time and significantly less intraoperative blood loss (P<0.05). In group A, dysphagia occurred in one patient, and superior laryngeal nerve injury in one. Urinary tract infection occurred in one patient in group B. JOA score in both groups significantly increased 3 days after surgery (P<0.05), and at last follow-up compared with 3 days after surgery (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonic osteotome was a safe and effective tool for subtotal anterior cervical vertebral resection.

Strategies to Achieve Spinal Fusion in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: An Overview

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical fusion offers surgeons a safe and reliable surgical option for single-level and multilevel pathology; however, multilevel fusions pose a higher risk of complications than single-level fusions, including possible pseudoarthrosis, adjacent segment disease, sagittal imbalance, and construct subsidence. Various techniques can be used to mitigate risk in multilevel anterior cervical fusion.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We reviewed the literature to determine the best surgical strategies in multilevel anterior cervical fusion.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for articles published from January 1980 through July 2019. Two authors identified relevant articles and then manually screened them for others to include in this review.

RESULTS

We initially identified 1936 articles and included 48 in our review. We found that clinical outcomes of multilevel anterior cervical fusion can be optimized through the use of biologics and graft selection, the evaluation of pre-existing deformity, the assessment of comorbidities, and the selection of fusion levels. Meticulous surgical technique in conjunction with modern surgical tools, such as instrumentation and biologics, allow surgeons to address complex cervical problems while limiting morbidity and enhancing clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Multilevel anterior cervical fusions offer a relatively safe and reliable treatment option for both single-level and multilevel pathology.

Effect of K-line on posterior cervical surgery in patients with posterior longitudinal ligament ossification

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of K-line on posterior single-door decompression with fusion fixation (PFF) and posterior single-door decompression with non-fusion fixation (PNF) for patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

A total of 65 patients with OPLL were analyzed retrospectively. They consisted of 44 patients with positive K-line, designated as the K ( +) group, and 21 patients with negative K-line, designated as K (-). The patients were also divided into a PFF group (38 patients) and a PNF group (27 patients). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, C2-C7 Cobb angle, improvement rate of JOA score, and complications were calculated and statistically analyzed between the groups.

RESULTS

In the K ( +) group, there were no significant differences in the incidence of C5 nerve root palsy and C2-C7 Cobb angle between the two groups of surgical patients, but there were significant differences in the improvement rate of JOA score and the incidence of axial pain. In the K (-) group, there were no significant differences in the incidence of axial pain, the incidence of C5 nerve root palsy, and preoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle between the two groups, but significant differences were observed in the improvement rate of JOA score and C2-C7 Cobb angle at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In the K ( +) group, the improvement rate of JOA score was higher and the incidence of axial pain was lesser in the PNF group than in the PFF group. In the K (-) group, the improvement rate of JOA score was higher in the PFF group than in the PNF group, and there was significant loss of C2-C7 Cobb angle in the PNF group.

Clinical outcomes of epidural and intradural decompression for treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy

Objective

This study was performed to examine the clinical outcomes of epidural and intradural decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Methods

The data for 13 patients who underwent epidural and intradural decompression for treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy (study group) and 20 patients who underwent only cervical laminoplasty, fusion, and epidural decompression (historical control group) were retrospectively reviewed. The preoperative and postoperative neurological status was evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score.

Results

All patients’ neurological symptoms were significantly improved at the final follow-up. In the study group, the patients’ mean preoperative JOA score was 8.07 ± 1.80, and the final score improved by 70.88% ± 21.18%. The blood loss and operation time were significantly greater in the study group than control group. The recovery time was shorter in the study group than control group. The improvement rate was not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

A pia mater incision with separation of the arachnoid adhesion can significantly improve the cerebrospinal fluid flow and spinal blood flow in degenerative cervical myelopathy. Arachnoid adhesion can lead to intradural spinal scar compression. The surgical intervention described herein can achieve satisfactory neurological outcomes and shorten the recovery time.

Surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: Anterior decompression and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) with that of posterior laminoplasty (LAMP) for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for cervical myelopathy owing to OPLL between 2007 and 2016 at our institution. Fifty patients were included in this study, including 17 patients in ADF group and 33 patients in LAMP group. Surgical outcomes were assessed under the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. The radiologic and clinical data were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in age, follow-up time, operation time, blood loss, length of stay, preoperative JOA score, occupying ratio of OPLL, diameter of spinal canal, preoperative and final follow-up C2-C7 Cobb angles, and the change of C2-C7 Cobb angle before and after operation between ADF and LAMP groups. The final follow-up JOA score and the neurological recovery rate were significantly higher in ADF group than in LAMP group, particularly in patients with segmental-type OPLL. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage is a major complication after ADF, C5 paralysis, and axial pain frequently results from LAMP.

CONCLUSION

Compared with LAMP, ADF shows better improvement of neurological function in patients with cervical myelopathy due to OPLL, especially in patients with segmental-type cervical OPLL.

A novel anterior decompression technique for kyphosis line (K-line) ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL): vertebral body sliding osteotomy

Background

Conventional anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is associated with a high incidence of surgery-related complications. A novel anterior decompression technique [vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO)] has been developed to prevent such complications and achieve effective anterior decompression for severe OPLL patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the procedure of novel surgical technique and to evaluate the long-term surgical outcomes.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2014, 24 patients underwent VBSO for treatment of cervical myelopathy caused by severe OPLL. Operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), neurologic outcomes and perioperative complications were investigated. Various radiographic parameters such as the preoperative canal occupying ratio, postoperative canal widening, and preoperative and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment were also measured. Minimum follow-up was 24 months.

Results

The mean Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score) improved from 12.4±2.9 preoperatively to 16.0±1.4 at the final follow-up (P<0.05). The mean recovery rate of the C-JOA score at the final follow-up was 68.65%±17.80%. The mean operating time was 130.7±21.0 minutes and the EBL was 176.3±38.0 mL. There were no perioperative complications. Pseudarthrosis was detected in two cases at 12 months postoperatively. The average spinal canal compromised ratio by OPLL decreased from 64.0%±15.0% preoperatively to 15.5%±12.2% postoperatively (P<0.05), with an average postoperative canal widening of 5.15±1.39 mm.

Conclusions

Novel anterior decompression technique termed VBSO may be an effective and safe surgical option for anterior decompression surgery in patients with severe cervical OPLL. Since, VBSO does not involve a direct manipulation of the OPLL mass or dissection of the interspace between the OPLL and dura mater, this may significantly decrease the incidence of surgery-related complications, operation time, and intraoperative blood loss.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior decompression with fusion and posterior laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remains controversial because there are few comprehensive studies investigating the surgical methods. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate evidence in the literature and compare the surgical outcomes of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP), which are representative procedures for cervical OPLL.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify comparative studies of ADF and LAMP for cervical OPLL. The language was restricted to English, and the year of publication was from January 1980 to December 2018. We extracted outcomes from the studies, such as preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, cervical alignment, surgical complications and reoperation rate. Then, meta-analysis was performed for these surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were obtained, including 1 prospective cohort study and 11 retrospective cohort studies. In the meta-analysis, neurological recovery rate in JOA score was greater in ADF than in LAMP, especially in patients with a large canal occupying ratio (≥60%) and preoperative kyphotic alignment. ADF also exhibited more favorable results in postoperative cervical alignment. In contrast, operating time and intraoperative blood loss were greater in ADF. Surgical complications were more frequently seen in ADF, leading to higher rates of reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed both the merits and shortcomings of ADF and LAMP. ADF resulted in more favorable neurological recovery compared to LAMP, especially for patients with massive OPLL and kyphotic alignment. Postoperative cervical lordosis was also better preserved in ADF. However, ADF was associated with greater surgical invasion and higher incidences of surgical complications.

Long-term Outcome of Anterior Cervical Decompression With Fusion for Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Including Postsurgical Remnant Ossified Spinal Lesion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the outcome, perioperative complications, and prognostic factors of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is little information on the long-term surgical outcome of ACDF including postsurgical remnant ossified spinal lesion.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2013, 80 patients with cervical myelopathy towing to OPLL underwent ACDF at our hospital. Among these, 42 patients were followed-up for at least 5 years and their data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 7.9 ± 2.8 years, and the overall improvement rate was 59.2% ± 15.0%. Although 12 (15.0%) perioperative complications were observed in 6 patients, accompanied by neurological deterioration, none of the patients had chronic complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis that included the preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, type of OPLL, occupying ratio of OPLL, and number of fused segments and increase in the transverse area of the cord identified the latter parameter as the only independent and significant determinant of radiological and clinical improvement of >50%. Among the patients with remaining ossified spinal lesions out of the decompressed range (16 patients), postoperative progression was observed in 6 cases (14.3%) who were all of the mixed type; floated lesions within the decompressed range did not show progression during the follow-up. Adjacent segment degeneration was seen in nine (21.4%) patients, and neurological signs and symptoms were seen in only three of the nine patients and only one patient required revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

The long-term clinical outcome of patients with cervical OPLL after ACDF is considered satisfactory. Surgery-related complications and adjacent segment diseases should not be reasons to avoid ACDF. Care should be taken in selecting ACDF with postsurgical remnant ossified spinal lesion, as it could progress postoperatively especially in the mixed type OPLL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Serum oxidative stress influences neurological recovery after surgery to treat acutely worsening symptoms of compression myelopathy: a cross-sectional human study

Background

Recent reports indicate that oxidative stress induced by reactive oxygen species is associated with the pathobiology of neurodegenerative disorders that involve neuronal cell apoptosis. Here we conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate serum levels of oxidative stress in cervical compression myelopathy.

Methods

Thirty-six serum samples were collected preoperatively from patients treated for acutely worsening compression myelopathy (AM) and chronic compression myelopathy (CM). Serum levels of oxidative stress markers were evaluated by measuring derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites (ROM), which reflect concentrations of hydroperoxides. ROM in healthy individuals range from 250 to 300 (U. CARR), whereas ROM >340–400 and > 400 define moderate and severe levels of oxidative stress, respectively. Difference of ROM by the cause of disorders whether cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) or cervical ossification of longitudinal ligament (OPLL), correlations between ROM and patient age, body mass index (BMI), history of smoking, existence of diabetes were examined. Neurological evaluations according to Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were performed and correlated with ROM.

Results

ROM increased to 349.5 ± 54.8, representing a moderate oxidative stress, in CM samples. ROM increased to 409.2 ± 77.9 in AM samples, reflecting severe oxidative stress which were significantly higher than for CM samples (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference by the cause of disorders (CSM or OPLL). ROM were significantly increased in AM serum samples from female patients versus AM male and CM patients (p < 0.05). There were no correlations between ROM and age, BMI, history of smoking, and existence of diabetes. A negative correlation between ROM and recovery rate of JOA score (R² = 0.454, p = 0.047) was observed in the AM group.

Conclusions

Although moderate oxidative stress was present in patients with CM, levels of oxidative stress increased in severity in patients with AM. These results suggest that postsurgical neurological recovery is influenced by severe oxidative stress in AM.

Reoperation Rates after Laminoplasty for Cervical Disorders: A 26-Year Period Survival Function Method Analysis

Introduction

Laminoplasty is a common surgery for cervical myelopathy. Previous studies have analyzed the reoperation rates in posterior decompression surgeries of the cervical spine. However, few studies have solely focused on midline-splitting laminoplasty (MSL) using a large number of patients. This aims to analyze the reoperation rates after MSL using the survival function method.

Methods

Between 1988 and 2013, 4,208 MSLs were performed as a primary operation for cervical myelopathy and enrolled in our spinal surgery registration system. The Kaplan-Meier survival function method was used to analyze the rates of reoperation.

Results

Of 4,208 patients with primary MSL, 40 underwent reoperation for neurological complications. The overall reoperation rate was 0.26%, 0.64%, 0.83%, 0.93%, and 0.95% at 1, 5, 10, 20, and >20 years, respectively. The causes of reoperation were postoperative cervical radiculopathy in 10 patients, stenosis at an adjacent level in 8, stenosis due to failed “open-door” lamina in 6, instability of the cervical spine in 4, cervical disc herniation in 3, elongation of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in 3, spinal cord injury in 1, fracture of the cervical spine in 1, postoperative scar formation in 1, ossification of anterior longitudinal ligament in 1, and unknown in 2. The number of patients with surgical site infection (SSI) who needed surgical debridement was 34 (0.81%).

Conclusions

Excluding reoperations for SSI, the reoperation rate of MSL was approximately 1.0% at the maximum of 26 years after surgery. MSL was determined to be a reliable surgical procedure regarding postoperative complications requiring additional surgeries.

Progression of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament After Laminoplasty or Laminectomy With Posterior Fixation

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to investigate the course of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) progression after laminoplasty (LP) or laminectomy with posterior fixation (PF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

LP is now recognized as a standard technique for the treatment of cervical multisegment OPLL; however, PF is beneficial for patients with severe stenosis. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in mechanical stress in OPLL, which is assumed to significantly impact progression.

METHODS

The progression of OPLL was assessed using midline sagittal computed tomography images of the cervical spine at various follow-up points. Radiographic parameters including the C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 range of motion (ROM), and adjacent cranial and caudal segmental ROMs were measured. Postoperative changes and differences between the LP and PF groups in the radiographic parameters were calculated to assess biomechanical stress. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors affecting the progression rate.

RESULTS

The authors included 14 PF and 36 LP patients, with a mean follow-up period of 28.9±20.8 and 37.6±16.8 months, respectively (P=0.069). After surgical treatment, both groups showed loss of cervical lordosis (9.2±6.9 vs. 5.3±8.2 degrees, P=0.220) and C2-C7 ROM (14.6± 13.5 vs. 13.1±12.2 degrees, P=0.861). The decrease of ROM in the cranial adjacent segment was larger in the LP group than in the PF group (0.7±4.1 vs. 1.4±5.5 degrees, P=0.453). The ROM in the caudal adjacent segment decreased in the LP group but increased in the PF group (-1.4±6.2 vs. 2.6±5.1 degrees, P=0.041). The progression rate was 2.15±1.31 mm/mo in the PF group and 1.53±1.04 mm/mo in the LP group (P=0.041). PF showed an odds ratio of 12.917 for a higher progression rate (95% confidence interval, 1.397-119.443; P=0.024).

CONCLUSION

The rate of progression of cervical OPLL was significantly higher after PF than after LP.Level III-a retrospective analysis.

Effect of microscopically assisted decompression with micro-hook scalpel in the surgical treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

Objective

This study was performed to investigate the effect of microscopically assisted decompression using a micro-hook scalpel on ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

Methods

Sixty-one patients with OPLL were divided into Group A (posterior surgery with laminectomy of the responsible segment and lateral mass screw fixation) and Group B (anterior cervical corpectomy with intervertebral titanium cage fusion). Neurological function was assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and recovery rate. The fixation status and the result of spinal canal decompression were radiographically assessed.

Results

In Groups A and B, the JOA score was significantly higher and the VAS score was significantly lower at 1 week postoperatively and at the final follow-up than during the preoperative period. The mean recovery rate in Group A and B was 59.92% ± 13.46% and 62.28% ± 14.00%, respectively. Postoperative radiographs showed good positioning and no damage to the internal fixation materials. The spinal canal was also fully decompressed.

Conclusions

Microscopically assisted decompression with a micro-hook scalpel in both anterior and posterior surgeries achieved good clinical effects in patients with OPLL.

How to Avoid Postoperative Remaining Ossification Mass in Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively review the cases with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) treated with anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF). Patients with postoperative remaining ossification mass (PROM) are analyzed to figure out the causes and preventions of this problem.

METHODS

A total of 115 patients were included. PROM was identified as remaining OPLL existed in the spinal canal other than included in the vertebral-OPLL complex on postoperative computed tomography. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system was used to evaluate the neurologic status. Surgery-related complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and spinal cord or nerve injury were all recorded. The patients with the PROM group and those without the PROM group were compared.

RESULTS

There were 14 patients with wide-base OPLL (12.2%) and 10 patients (8.7%) with PROM among the 115 patients with OPLL. The 10 patients with PROM were all with wide-base OPLL. The average improvement rate of Japanese Orthopaedic Association score in patients without PROM was significantly larger than that in patients with PROM (69.5 ± 22.6% vs. 36.7 ± 22.0, P < 0.01). Incidence rate of postoperative CSF leakage and neural deterioration were significantly higher in patients with PROM than that in patients without PROM (CSF leakage, 40.0% vs. 5.9%; neural deterioration, 50.0% vs. 3.0%). No other complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of PROM might cause complications and poor neural function recovery in patients treated with ACAF. Surgical techniques should be noted to avoid PROM in ACAF surgery.

Comparison of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion versus Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Spondylotic cervical myelopathy is a severe condition commonly affecting aging people. Although many investigations have been conducted, a consensus on the best surgical management is still missing. The aim of our study was to systematically review the pertinent literature and carry out a meta-analysis to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of the anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and the posterior laminoplasty.

METHODS

This study was conducted in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines statement. Different medical database (PubMed, Embase, Scopus) were screened for eligible scientific reports. The key words "cervical," "spondylosis," "myelopathy," "laminoplasty," "ACDF" (MeSH) have been used in any possible combination. As outcome variables, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, operation time, blood loss, cervical lordosis, range of motion and, complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 626 articles were screened and 5 finally included in the meta-analysis. Comparing the anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and laminoplasty groups, no differences were found in Japanese Orthopedic Association score, operation time, and complication rate. The ACDF was associated with lower intraoperative blood loss and better cervical lordosis preservation, whereas the laminoplasty was associated with a wider cervical range of motion.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis seem to suggest that ACDF should be preferred to the laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy, although proper designed randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to further investigate this relevant ongoing issue.

Analyses of effect factors associated with the postoperative dissatisfaction of patients undergoing open-door laminoplasty for cervical OPLL: a retrospective cohort study

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the effect factors associated with the postoperative dissatisfaction of patients undergoing open-door laminoplasty for cervical OPLL.

Methods

In this study, 194 patients, who underwent open-door laminoplasty for cervical OPLL from January 2009 to January 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. The Patient Satisfaction Index (PSI) was collected at discharge, 6 months, 1 year, and the last follow-up. According to the PSI, patients were divided into satisfied group and dissatisfied group. The possible effect factors included demographic variables and surgery-related variables.

Results

At discharge, 42 (21.6%) patients were in the dissatisfied group, as compared to the satisfied group, the hospitalization cost, hospital stay, postoperative depression, the axial neck pain, delayed wound healing, and VAS-neck had significant statistical differences. At 6-month follow-up, 25 (12.9%) patients were in the dissatisfied group. The axial neck pain and JOA score had significant statistical differences between the two groups, and no significant differences were found between the two groups in other items. At 1 year with 18 (9.3%) dissatisfied patients and last follow-up with 14 (7.2%) dissatisfied patients, the JOA score and symptom recurrence had significant statistical differences. For further analysis, the dissatisfied patients with axial neck pain at 6 months were significantly higher than that at other terms and the JOA score of the two groups increased gradually with prolonging of restoration years but compared with the dissatisfied group, the JOA scores were obviously better in the satisfied group at the last follow-up.

Conclusions

Overall, to patients undergoing open-door laminoplasty for cervical OPLL, hospitalization cost and neck pain might be mainly associated with patient dissatisfaction at the early and middle recovery. Patient dissatisfaction at the long-term treatment outcome might be mainly associated with the low improvement rate of JOA score and symptom recurrence.

Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Cervical Myelopathy: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify advantages and disadvantages of the anterior and posterior approaches in the treatment of cervical stenosis and myelopathy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Both anterior and posterior surgical approaches for cervical stenosis and myelopathy have been shown to result in improvement in health-related outcomes. Despite the evidence, controversy remains regarding the best approach to achieve decompression and correct deformity.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with cervical stenosis and myelopathy who had undergone anterior cervical fusion and instrumentation (n = 38) or posterior cervical laminectomy and instrumentation (n = 51) with at least 6 months of follow-up. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography scans, as well as health-related outcomes, including Visual Analog Scale for neck pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association score for myelopathy, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form-36 Health Survey, were collated before surgery and at follow-up (median 12.0 and 12.1 months for anterior and posterior group, respectively).

RESULTS

Both anterior and posterior approaches were associated with significant improvements in all studied quality of life parameters with the exception of general health in the anterior group and energy and fatigue in the posterior group. In the anterior group, follow-up assessment revealed a significant increase in C2-7 lordosis. Both approaches were accompanied by significant increases in C2-7 sagittal balance [sagittal vertical axis (SVA)]. There were two complications in the anterior group and nine complications in the posterior group; the incidence of complications between the two groups was not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

When the benefits of one approach over the other are not self-evident, the anterior approach is recommended, as it was associated with a shorter hospital stay and more successful restoration of cervical lordosis than posterior surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Prevalence and risk factors of axial neck pain in patients undergoing multilevel anterior cervical decompression with fusion surgery

Objectives

The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence and risk factors for axial neck pain in patients undergoing multilevel anterior cervical decompression with fusion surgery.

Methods

In this study, 88 patients, who underwent multilevel anterior cervical decompression with fusion surgery from January 2012 to January 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the postoperative axial neck pain, the patients were classified into two groups: axial pain group and no axial pain group. The patients were followed up 3 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after cervical anterior surgery for the early- and long-term clinical evaluation. The possible effect factors included demographic variables (age, sex, BMI, smoking, drinking, heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, preoperative kyphosis, preoperative axial neck pain, preoperative JOA scores, and ODI) and surgery-related variables (surgical option, vertebral lesions, spinal canal stenosis rate, superior fusion segment, presence of intramedullary high signal intensity).

Results

The prevalence of axial neck pain was 27.3% (24 cases of 88). Our results showed that preoperative axial neck pain (62% vs 23%, P < 0.001) and preoperative kyphosis (42% vs 21.9%, P < 0.001) were risk factors for axial pain after multilevel anterior cervical surgery. Additionally, for patients with preoperative cervical kyphosis, compared to no axial pain group, the axial neck group was significantly more likely to exist a higher preoperative angle of C2–7 (13.31 ± 2.33 vs 7.33 ± 2.56, P < 0.001) and a higher correction range for kyphosis (20.24 ± 4.12 vs 12.34 ± 3.12, P < 0.001). However, for all the patients with postoperative axial symptoms, the improvement rate of axial pain was significantly higher for patients without cervical kyphosis at the early-term follow-up (3 weeks) (P = 0.032), no significant differences were found at the medium-term (P = 0.554) and long-term follow-up (P = 0.902), and improvements of clinical symptom have no obvious difference at the last follow-up.

Conclusions

Overall, preoperative axial neck pain and kyphosis could predict axial neck pain for patients undergoing multilevel anterior cervical decompression with fusion surgery, and recovery of cervical kyphosis may contribute to the long-term recovery of neural function, but may also suffer from risk of short-term axial pain, which could be reduced through moderate cervical curvature recovery.

Postoperative Progression of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to provide a systematic and comprehensive review of the existing literature regrading postoperative ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) progression.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted an exhaustive review of electronic databases. Potential articles were screened and related information was extracted and analyzed. Twenty-four articles with low-quality evidence were included in the review. The findings of the literature review were divided into several groups: the relationship of surgery to OPLL progression; incidence and risk factors; timing and process of OPLL progression; the effect of additional instrumentation on progression; and neurologic deterioration related with progression.

RESULTS

There was no definitive conclusion for whether surgery could accelerate OPLL progression compared with the natural course. The incidence of postoperative OPLL progression was reported from 3.3% to 74.5%. Younger age, involvement of multiple levels and mixed or continuous types are recognized as risk factors. OPLL could progress transversely and longitudinally and progression in length appeared more significant than progression in thickness. Although radiologic OPLL progression was observed significantly more frequently after laminoplasty than after fusion surgery, whether additional instrumented fusion could suppress progression needs further research. Radiographic progression of OPLL did not positively correspond with neurologic deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of high-level evidence makes it difficult to draw definite conclusions and further research and long-term follow-up clinical studies are needed to better understand postoperative OPLL progression.