Diagnostic value of trunk flexion–extension testing in old chronic low back pain patients

The clinical utility and reliability of surface electromyography in individuals with chronic low back pain: A systematic review

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common disorder worldwide, affecting young and old adults alike. Kinematic studies of lumbar-pelvic mobility allied with surface electromyogram (sEMG) can assist in the assessment and management of CLBP. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the evidence relating to the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the surface electromyogram in chronic low back pain patients during flexion-extension-relaxation tasks. Five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase and CINAHL) were searched for eligible studies from inception to March 2024. The risk of bias assessment for the included studies was conducted using the QUADAS-2 tool. Studies included adults (≥18 years) with CLBP > 3 months, reported diagnostic accuracy or reliability measures for sEMG during flexion-extension-relaxation tasks. Eleven studies were included in our systematic review. The risk of bias was found to be high for patient selection, reference standard and flow and timing domains with low risk of bias for the index test domain in most of the included studies. For diagnostic accuracy, six studies reported values ranging between 56-99 % indicating poor to excellent accuracy levels. Four studies reported values between 76-100 % for sensitivity and 65-100 % for specificity indicating sufficient to excellent accuracy levels. Seven studies reported moderate to excellent reliability levels, ranging between 0.66-0.99. This systematic review found the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of sEMG in CLBP patients to range from poor to excellent levels. This systematic review adds knowledge for practitioners and clinicians regarding the use of sEMG during forward, flexion and relaxation tasks/movements.

The relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, pain and disability in low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The role of spinal movement alterations in low back pain (LBP) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analyses examined the relationships between spinal amplitude of movement, disability and pain intensity in patients with LBP.

DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT

We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Pedro and Web of Science for relevant articles until 14th March 2023. Risk of bias was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Studies Tool. We analysed the relationships between amplitude of movement, disability and pain intensity with standard correlational meta-analyses and meta-analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM) in cross-sectional and longitudinal data.

RESULTS

A total of 106 studies (9001 participants) were included. In cross-sectional data, larger amplitude of movement was associated with lower disability (pooled coefficient: -0.25, 95% confidence interval: [-0.29 to -0.21]; 69/5899 studies/participants) and pain intensity (-0.13, [-0.17 to -0.09]; 74/5806). An increase in amplitude of movement was associated with a decrease in disability (-0.23, [-0.31 to -0.15]; 33/2437) and pain intensity (-0.25, [-0.33 to -0.17]; 38/2172) in longitudinal data. MASEM revealed similar results and, in addition, showed that amplitude of movement had a very small influence on the pain intensity-disability relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

These results showed a significant but small association between amplitude of movement and disability or pain intensity. Moreover, they demonstrated a direct association between an increase in amplitude of movement and a decrease in pain intensity or disability, supporting interventions aiming to reduce protective spinal movements in patients with LBP.

SIGNIFICANCE

The large meta-analyses performed in this work revealed an association between reductions in spinal amplitude of movement and increased levels of disability and pain intensity in people with LBP. Moreover, it highlighted that LBP recovery is associated with a reduction in protective motor behaviour (increased amplitude of movement), supporting the inclusion of spinal movement in the biopsychosocial understanding and management of LBP.

Do the WHO-ICF personal factors "age" and "sex" impact limited activity and restricted participation category profiles differently between younger and older women and men in multimodal chronic back pain rehabilitation?

PURPOSE

To investigate if the International Classification of Functioning and Health (ICF) context factors "age" and "sex" would impact the disablement and respective improvement with rehabilitation defined with the ICF core set for chronic low back pain (cLBP). Furthermore, associations between limitations/restrictions and measures of body function or quality of life were of interest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One thousand five hundred and twelve employed cLBP patients who completed 6 months of outpatient rehabilitation and for whom complete assessments were available before and after rehabilitation. Rehabilitation comprised of progressive resistance training, psychological counseling, and educational sessions. Main outcome measures were the ICF-activity/participation core categories automatically predicted from random forests and utilizing information from the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Pain Disability Index.

RESULTS

Generalized linear-mixed models revealed that upon completion of rehabilitation the presence of a limitation within the ICF activity "walking" significantly decreased with significant between-group differences. The category "doing housework" demonstrated gender-specific differences, and both gender- and age-specific differences were observed for work-related participation categories. There were no meaningful associations between ICF limitation/restriction categories and body function measures (point-biserial/Spearman's correlations).

CONCLUSIONS

The personal factors "age" and "sex" impact some ICF limitation/restriction categories in cLBP; appropriately addressing these personal features could further improve phase III rehabilitation outcome.Implications for rehabilitationConsistent with calls to explore the age and sex/gender influence on health and disease, little is known how these factors affect the disablement of individuals with chronic back pain.The factors "age" and "sex" drive differences in some categories within the ICF activity/restriction categories.If age- and gender-specific features in activities and participation are not appropriately addressed through interventions, rehabilitation outcome may remain suboptimal in cLBP.

Variações baseadas em gênero no movimento e na força isométrica do tronco em jovens adultos com dor lombar: Um estudo de caso-controle prospectivo

Objective  To determine gender-based variations in trunk range of motion (RoM) and isometric strength (IS) in symptomatic and asymptomatic young adults.

Methods  In this prospective case-control study, 73 subjects with low back pain (LBP) and 80 asymptomatic subjects were analyzed. Dynamometer-based device trunk RoM and IS measurements in extension, flexion, and rotation were compared in both groups and gender-based subgroups. Multivariate analysis was used to determine factors influencing trunk RoM and IS.

Results  Symptomatic males had significantly less extension RoM and extension, flexion, and rotation isometric trunk strength (ITS) ( p  < 0.0001) compared with asymptomatic males, whereas no significant difference was found between asymptomatic and symptomatic females. However, the mean extension-flexion RoM and mean extension-flexion ITS ratios were significantly lower ( p  = 0.04) in asymptomatic females compared with symptomatic females. Female gender was significantly associated with less extension and flexion ITS in both asymptomatic and symptomatic subjects.

Conclusion  Males with LBP had significant global ITS weakness when compared with asymptomatic males. Despite no significant ITS difference in symptomatic versus asymptomatic females, LBP caused significant extension-flexion RoM and ITS imbalance in females. These gender-based variations in trunk RoM and IS, especially the extensor-flexor IS imbalance in females, must be considered while designing rehabilitation treatment protocols for LBP.

Normative Reference Values for Trunk Range of Motion and Isometric Muscle Strength in Asymptomatic Young Indian Adults

PURPOSE

To determine normative reference values for trunk range of motion (ROM) and isometric strength (TIS) in asymptomatic young, Indian adults.

METHODS

Age, gender, body mass index, lifestyle, and dynamometer-based device measurements of trunk ROM and TIS in extension (EXT), flexion (FLX), and rotation (ROT) were recorded and analysed in 80 asymptomatic subjects between 20 and 40 years of age. Correlation analysis was performed to determine factors influencing EXT and FLX ROM and TIS.

RESULTS

The normative reference values for mean trunk EXT, FLX, right ROT, and left ROT ROM were 23° (95th percentile 31.9°), 40.2°(95th percentile 51.5°), 36.8°(95th percentile 57.7°), and 35.4° (95th percentile 55.7°), respectively; and for mean EXT, FLX, right ROT, and left ROT TIS were 118.1 Nm (95th percentile 278.8 Nm), 63.8 Nm (95th percentile 159.4 Nm), 39.9 Nm (95th percentile 113.6 Nm), and 42.8 Nm (95th percentile 108.9 Nm), respectively. The mean EXT (p = 0.0002), right (p = 0.02), and left ROT ROM (p = 0.01), and the mean EXT, FLX, and ROT TIS (p < 0.0001) were significantly greater in males compared to females. The FLX, EXT, and ROT TIS showed significant strong correlation with EXT and FLX TIS. Mean TIS values in Indian subjects were lower when compared to subjects from other countries.

CONCLUSION

This study established normative reference values for trunk ROM and TIS in asymptomatic young Indian adults. These reference values can be helpful to diagnose trunk ROM and TIS deficits, identify subjects at risk for LBP and disability, and individualise rehabilitation treatment in them.

Relationship between psychological factors and spinal motor behaviour in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis investigated whether more negative psychological factors are associated with less spinal amplitude of movement and higher trunk muscle activity in individuals with low back pain. Furthermore, it examined whether pain intensity was a confounding factor in this relationship. We included studies that provided at least 1 correlation coefficient between psychological (pain-related fear, catastrophizing, depression, anxiety, and self-efficacy) and spinal motor behaviour (spinal amplitude and trunk muscle activity) measures. In total, 52 studies (3949 participants) were included. The pooled correlation coefficients (95% confidence interval; number of participants) were -0.13 (-0.18 to -0.09; 2832) for pain-related fear, -0.16 (-0.23 to -0.09; 756) for catastrophizing, -0.08 (-0.13 to -0.03; 1570) for depression, -0.08 (-0.30 to 0.14; 336) for anxiety, and -0.06 (-0.46 to 0.36; 66) for self-efficacy. The results indicated that higher levels of pain-related fear, catastrophizing, and depression are significantly associated with reduced amplitudes of movement and larger muscle activity and were consistent across subgroup and moderation analyses. Pain intensity did not significantly affect the association between these psychological factors and spinal motor behaviour and had a very small independent association with spinal motor behaviour. In conclusion, the very small effect sizes found in the meta-analyses question the role of psychological factors as major causes of spinal movement avoidance in low back pain. Experimental studies with more specific and individualized measures of psychological factors, pain intensity, and spinal motor behaviour are recommended.

Efficacy of the Pilates versus general exercises versus educational workshops on neuromuscular parameters: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Muscle strength, flexibility and changes in muscle recruitment patterns are usually associated to low back pain (LBP). Physical exercises can reverse the adverse changes associated to LBP.

OBJECTIVES

Compare Pilates, general exercises and educational workshop on muscle flexibility, strength and recruitment of the trunk extensor muscles in women with LBP.

METHODS

Forty-six women were randomly divided into Pilates group (PG, n = 16), general exercise group (GEG, n = 15), and educational group (EG, n = 15). This study sought to determine flexibility, muscle strength, and muscle recruitment of right (RIL), left (LIL) iliocostalis lumbar; right (RMU) and left (LMU) lumbar multifidus muscles. Both PG and GEG performed 16 exercise sessions, while EG attended 4 workshops. Statistical analysis used data sample from Shapiro-Wilk test, Pearson's correlation, multivariate analysis, mixed variance analysis, and Cohen's index.

RESULTS

Flexibility showed no differences (p > 0.05). Muscle strength increased in the intragroup analysis for PG (p = 0.003) and GEG (p = 0.002); however, the intergroup analysis presented no difference. Intergroup showed statistically significant differences for the recruitment of RMU in PG (p < 0.001). Intragroup analysis presented differences after interventions in PG for RIL (p = 0.001); in GEG for LIL (p = 0.005); and in EG for RIL (p = 0.007), LIL (p = 0.002) and RMU (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

None of the groups showed flexibility improvements. PG and GEG increased muscle strength through intragroup analysis. Intergroup analysis showed an increase in recruitment of the RMU muscle in PG and all groups demonstrated significant improvements in the intragroup analysis.

[The lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomen as a diagnostic test in assessment of lumbar impairment. Sensitivity and specificity]

OBJECTIVE

To define the role of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon (FRP), assessed through ratios (FRR), as a diagnostic test to define impairment in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The study sample consisted of 180 participants (16 healthy volunteers and 164 patients on work disability due to CLBP), who were consecutively referred for evaluation at the Biomechanics Laboratory of a workplace accident insurance company from January 2012 to December 2017. The evaluations consisted of an isometric dynamometry test, a kinematic test and assessment of the FRP phenomenon. Minimum criteria were established in the performance of the tests for their acceptance as valid for the study. Lumbar impairment or clinical recovery was defined on the basis of the results of the dynamometry and kinematic tests. The FRP response was assessed with FRRs. A total of 4 different ratios were taken for analysis with ROC curves.

RESULTS

A total of 86 valid tests were obtained (16 classified as lumbar impairment and 71 as recovered cases). The best ratio obtained an area under the ROC curve of 0.87, with a sensitivity of 0.84, a specificity of 0.87, and a positive predictive value of 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

The FRP test, along with dynamometry and kinematic evaluations, is effective in identifying lumbar impairment and is the easiest test for patients with CLBP to perform.

Dynamics of Changes in Isometric Strength and Muscle Imbalance in the Treatment of Women with Low back Pain

The aim of the study was to evaluate the dynamics of isometric changes in strength and muscular lumbar-pelvic imbalances in the treatment of women with low back pain. Forty-one women, nineteen in the study group (A) and twenty-two in the control group (B), participated in the study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed to assess the degree of degenerative changes in the lumbar spine. The diagnosis of isometric muscle strength and their imbalances was performed with the Tergumed 700 device. After six weeks of therapy in the study group (A), there was a significant improvement in the strength of all the examined muscle groups. However, in the control group (B), significant improvement occurred only in the strength of the lumbar flexor muscles and the flexor muscles on the left side. Furthermore, there was a significant intensification of the imbalance of left flexor muscle strength compared to right flexor strength in group B. Significant differences in favour of the study group (A) concerned the strength of the rotator muscles to the left, the strength of the extensor muscles of the lumbar spine, the strength of the flexors of the lumbar spine to the right, and the balance of the strength of the lumbar spine flexors to the left compared to the strength of the flexor muscles to the right. Therapy with the Tergumed 700 system leads to an increase in the muscle strength of the lumbar and pelvic complex, compensating for its imbalance, bringing beneficial effects in the treatment of low back pain.

Diagnosis of painful cemented vertebrae from failed vertebroplasty: modified dynamic radiographs play an important role

PURPOSE

The diagnosis of painful cemented vertebrae resulting from failed PV is not clearly defined in literature. This report evaluates the effectiveness of modified dynamic radiographs in diagnosing painful cemented vertebrae resulting from failed PV.

METHODS

From January 2011 to June 2015, 345 patients with a total of 399 VCFs underwent PV at our institution. Among the 345 patients, 27 patients underwent repeated PV at the cemented vertebrae because of persisting or recurrent pain after vertebroplasty. The prevertebroplasty examinations included routine radiographs, modified dynamic radiographs, and MRI. Kyphotic angles and the anterior vertebral body height (AVBH) were measured. The image findings in routine radiographs, modified dynamic radiographs, and MRI were compared. Finally, a visual analog scale was used to measure the outcome.

RESULTS

The patients ranged in age from 67 to 90 years. MRI revealed a moderate amount of fluid (definite diagnosis of refracture) in the cemented vertebrae in seven patients, bone edema without fluid in nine patients, and bone edema with minimal fluid in ten patients. The rate of diagnosis of painful cemented vertebrae according to MRI was 27% (7/26). The difference in the kyphotic angle between sitting and supine cross-table lateral radiographs was -9.36° ± 5.20° (P < 0.001). The difference in AVBH was 8.08 ± 3.21 mm (P < 0.001). All 27 patients were confirmed to have dynamic mobility according to the modified dynamic radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

When the diagnosis of painful cemented vertebrae is questionable, modified dynamic radiographs can help diagnose painful cemented vertebrae resulting from failed PV.