1
|
Robertson SC, Ashley MR. Complications of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA. SUPPLEMENT 2023; 130:169-178. [PMID: 37548736 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12887-6_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most common surgery performed on the cervical spine, and the number of its cases has tripled over the last two decades. Although this intervention is typically safe and effective, it carries an inherent complication risk, which should not be underestimated. Improvements in surgical techniques and advances in interbody fusion devices and plating systems have certainly reduced the rate of postoperative morbidity, but despite such progress, surgeons need to beware consistently of the potential complications, inform the patient of their possibility, and have a management strategy as they develop. This review discusses postoperative morbidity encountered in recently reported large studies on ACDF and highlights the senior author's own single-surgeon experience with 2579 such procedures performed between 1998 and 2017. In his clinical series, which is the largest one reported to date, the overall complication rate was 7.0% (180 cases), and dysphagia (1.9% of cases), graft/hardware failures (1.3% of cases), and postoperative hematomas (0.9% of cases) were noted most frequently. Understanding of the risk and clinical impact of complications after ACDF is very important and every effort should be put on their possible avoidance and on appropriate management when they do occur.
Collapse
|
2
|
Clinical risk factors associated with the development of adjacent segment disease in patients undergoing ACDF: A systematic review. Spine J 2023; 23:146-156. [PMID: 36031098 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Cervical fusion for degenerative disorders carries a known risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD), a complication that often requires surgical intervention to relieve symptoms. Proposed risk factors for development of ASD include both clinical and radiographic patient characteristics. However, the true impact of these risk factors is less understood due to limitations in sample sizes and loss to follow-up in individual studies. PURPOSE To review and critically examine current literature on the clinical risk factors associated with development of ASD in the cervical spine following ACDF. STUDY DESIGN Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. METHODS We systematically reviewed the literature in December 2019 according to the PRISMA guidelines. Methodological quality of included papers and quality of evidence were evaluated according to MINORS and GRADE framework. Meta-analysis was performed to compute the odds ratio(OR)with corresponding 95% confidence interval(CI)for dichotomous data, and mean difference(MD) with 95% CI for continuous variables. RESULTS 6,850 records were obtained using database query. Title/abstract screening resulted in 19 articles for full review, from which 10 papers met the criteria for analysis. There were no significant differences in gender (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.75-1.30), BMI (MD -0.09, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.29), smoking (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.80-1.59), alcohol (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.70-1.64), diabetes (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.56-1.31), number of segments fused (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.16), and preoperative JOA (MD -0.50, 95% CI -1.04 to 0.04). Age (MD 3.21, 95% CI 2.00-4.42), congenital/developmental stenosis (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.06-3.56), preoperative NDI (MD 4.18, 95% CI 2.11 to 6.26), preoperative VAS (neck) (MD 0.54 95% CI 0.09-0.99), and preoperative VAS (arm) (MD 0.98, 95% CI 0.43-1.34) were found to be statistically significant risk factors. CONCLUSION Patients with congenital stenosis, advanced age, and high preoperative NDI are at increased risk of developing ASD.
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang X, Lin Y, Wang Q, Gao L, Feng F. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. J Pain Res 2022; 15:3137-3156. [PMID: 36311292 PMCID: PMC9604433 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s375720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Study design A bibliometric analysis. Objective To identify and analyze the top 100 cited articles in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Summary of Background Data Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most routine surgical procedures in spine surgery. Many surgeons and academics have researched ACDF thoroughly and published numerous articles. However, there is no relevant bibliometric analysis. Therefore, our study aims to identify and analyze the top 100 cited articles in ACDF to identify the research trends. Methods We searched the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection database with restrictions and identified the top 100 cited publications in ACDF for analysis. Results The citation counts of the top 100 cited publications ranged from 37 to 361 (mean 67.42). All studies were published between 2008 and 2019, with 2013 and 2015 the most prolific years. The journals Spine and Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine provided the majority of the articles. Overall, the 100 articles came from 12 countries, with the United States being the top producer, followed by China and South Korea. The most frequent keywords were "spine", "anterior cervical discectomy and fusion", "interbody fusion", 'arthrodesis', "follow-up", "decompression", and "ACDF". Conclusion ACDF has been regarded as a classical gold standard in anterior cervical surgery, and the emergence of new surgical procedures has not affected its status. Cervical disc arthroplasty still needs further research and development. As the first bibliometric analysis of ACDF, this bibliometric study is meant to provide guidance for clinicians and scholars to research the development trend of this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xun Wang
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang310053, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yanze Lin
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang310053, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qiongtai Wang
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang310053, People’s Republic of China
| | - Liqing Gao
- Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang310053, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fabo Feng
- Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, People’s Republic of China,Correspondence: Fabo Feng, Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, People’s Republic of China, Email
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bari TJ, Hansen LV, Dahl B, Gehrchen M. Use of demineralized cortical fibers is associated with reduced risk of pseudarthrosis after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for adult spinal deformity. Spine Deform 2022; 10:657-667. [PMID: 34807398 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-021-00444-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effect of demineralized cortical fibers (DCF) on postoperative pseudarthrosis requiring revision surgery in patients undergoing pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS The use of DCF was introduced across all procedures in 2017 and subsequent patients undergoing PSO surgery were prospectively and consecutively registered. Following sample-size estimation, a retrospective cohort was also registered undergoing the same procedure immediately prior to the implementation of DCF. The non-DCF group underwent surgery with ABG. Minimum follow-up was 2 years in both groups. The main outcome was postoperative pseudarthrosis, either CT-verified or verified intraoperatively during revision surgery due to rod breakage and assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS A total of 48 patients were included in the DCF group and 76 in the non-DCF group. The DCF group had more frequently undergone previous spine surgery (60% vs 36%) and had shorter follow-up (32 ± 2 vs 40 ± 7 months). Pseudarthrosis occurred in 7 (15%) patients in the DCF group and 31 (41%) in the non-DCF group, corresponding to a relative risk increase of 2.6 (95%CI 1.3-2.4, P < 0.01). 1-KM survival analyses, taking time to event into account and thus the difference in follow-up, also showed increased pseudarthrosis in the non-DCF group (log-rank P = 0.022). Similarly, multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, instrumented levels and sacral fusion was also with significantly increased odds of pseudarthrosis in the non-DCF group (OR: 4.3, 95%CI: 1.7-11.3, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION We found considerable and significant reductions in pseudarthrosis following PSO surgery with DCF compared to non-DCF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanvir Johanning Bari
- Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Lars Valentin Hansen
- Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Benny Dahl
- Department of Orthopedics and Scoliosis Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Martin Gehrchen
- Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Singhatanadgige W, Sukthuayat A, Tanaviriyachai T, Kongtharvonskul J, Tanasansomboon T, Kerr SJ, Limthongkul W. Risk factors for polyetheretherketone cage subsidence following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:2557-2565. [PMID: 34297205 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04923-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interbody cage subsidence is a postoperative complication leading to poor outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). This study aimed to identify risk factors of cage subsidence in lumbar spinal diseases after MIS-TLIF using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, plain radiographs and three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) performed 12 months after MIS-TLIF were evaluated, and the risk of cage subsidence was calculated with odds ratio (OR), confidence interval (CI), and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 114 patients (mean age, 65 years) and 135 levels were included in this study: 80 (59.3%) with and 55 (40.7%) without cage subsidence. Multifidus atrophy showed the strongest association with PEEK cage subsidence (p < 0.001). Compared to those with normal mass, the odds of PEEK cage subsidence were 76.0 (95% CI: 3.9-1472.9) for severe atrophy. The factors significantly associated with cage subsistence were posterior cage position (OR = 4.2; p = 0.005), cage height ≥ 12 mm (OR = 7.6; p = 0.008), use of an autograft mixed with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) (OR = 5.8; p = 0.002), body mass index (BMI) > 27.5 kg/m2 (OR = 4.2; p = 0.03), and titanium-coated PEEK (Ti-PEEK) cage-type (OR = 38.4, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS In MIS-TLIF with a PEEK cage, the factors associated with an increased risk of cage subsidence were higher BMI, increased severity of multifidus muscle atrophy, Ti-coated PEEK cage-type, cage height ≥ 12 mm, use of DBM mixed autograft, and posterior cage position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weerasak Singhatanadgige
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
- Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Amnat Sukthuayat
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Terdpong Tanaviriyachai
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
- Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Teerachat Tanasansomboon
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Stephen J Kerr
- Biostatistics Excellence Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Worawat Limthongkul
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
- Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Rd, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bergin SM, Wang TY, Park C, Rajkumar S, Goodwin CR, Karikari IO, Abd-El-Barr MM, Shaffrey CI, Yarbrough CK, Than KD. Pseudarthrosis rate following anterior cervical discectomy with fusion using an allograft cellular bone matrix: a multi-institutional analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 50:E6. [PMID: 34062497 DOI: 10.3171/2021.3.focus2166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The use of osteobiologics, engineered materials designed to promote bone healing by enhancing bone growth, is becoming increasingly common for spinal fusion procedures, but the efficacy of some of these products is unclear. The authors performed a retrospective, multi-institutional study to investigate the clinical and radiographic characteristics of patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy with fusion performed using the osteobiologic agent Osteocel, an allograft mesenchymal stem cell matrix. METHODS The medical records across 3 medical centers and 12 spine surgeons were retrospectively queried for patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with the use of Osteocel. Pseudarthrosis was determined based on CT or radiographic imaging of the cervical spine. Patients were determined to have radiographic pseudarthrosis if they met any of the following criteria: 1) lack of bridging bone on CT obtained > 300 days postoperatively, 2) evidence of instrumentation failure, or 3) motion across the index level as seen on flexion-extension cervical spine radiographs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were then performed to identify independent preoperative or perioperative predictors of pseudarthrosis in this population. RESULTS A total of 326 patients met the inclusion criteria; 43 (13.2%) patients met criteria for pseudarthrosis, of whom 15 (34.9%) underwent revision surgery. There were no significant differences between patients with and those without pseudarthrosis, respectively, for patient age (54.1 vs 53.8 years), sex (34.9% vs 47.4% male), race, prior cervical spine surgery (37.2% vs 33.6%), tobacco abuse (16.3% vs 14.5%), chronic kidney disease (2.3% vs 2.8%), and diabetes (18.6% vs 14.5%) (p > 0.05). Presence of osteopenia or osteoporosis (16.3% vs 3.5%) was associated with pseudarthrosis (p < 0.001). Implant type was also significantly associated with pseudarthrosis, with a 16.4% rate of pseudarthrosis for patients with polyetherethereketone (PEEK) implants versus 8.4% for patients with allograft implants (p = 0.04). Average lengths of follow-up were 27.6 and 23.8 months for patients with and those without pseudarthrosis, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated osteopenia or osteoporosis (OR 4.97, 95% CI 1.51-16.4, p < 0.01) and usage of PEEK implant (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.04-4.83, p = 0.04) as independent predictors of pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS In patients who underwent single-level ACDF, rates of pseudarthrosis associated with the use of the osteobiologic agent Osteocel are higher than the literature-reported rates associated with the use of alternative osteobiologics. This is especially true when Osteocel is combined with a PEEK implant.
Collapse
|
7
|
Arnold PM, Vaccaro AR, Sasso RC, Goulet B, Fehlings MG, Heary RF, Janssen ME, Kopjar B. Two-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Undergoing Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Global Spine J 2021; 11:458-464. [PMID: 32875918 PMCID: PMC8119920 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220914880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Secondary analysis of data from the multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational device exemption study. OBJECTIVE Studies on outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in individuals with diabetes are scarce. We compared 24-month radiological and clinical outcomes in individuals with and without diabetes undergoing single-level ACDF with either i-FACTOR or local autologous bone. METHODS Between 2006 and 2013, 319 individuals with single-level degenerative disc disease (DDD) and no previous fusion at the index level underwent ACDF. The presence of diabetes determined the 2 cohorts. Data collected included radiological fusion evaluation, neurological outcomes, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and the 36-Item Short Form Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental component summary scores. RESULTS There were 35 individuals with diabetes (11.1%; average body mass index [BMI] = 32.99 kg/m2; SD = 5.72) and 284 without (average BMI = 28.32 kg/m2; SD = 5.67). The number of nondiabetic smokers was significantly higher than diabetic smokers: 73 (25.70%) and 3 (8.57%), respectively. Preoperative scores of NDI, VAS arm pain, and SF-36v2 were similar between the diabetic and nondiabetic participants at baseline; however, VAS neck pain differed significantly between the cohorts at baseline (P = .0089). Maximum improvement for NDI, VAS neck and arm pain, and SF-36v2 PCS and MCS scores was seen at 6 months in both cohorts and remained stable until 24 months. CONCLUSIONS ACDF is effective for cervical radiculopathy in patients with diabetes. Diabetes is not a contraindication for patients requiring single-level surgery for cervical DDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M. Arnold
- Carle Spine Institute, IL, USA,Paul M. Arnold, Carle Spine Institute,
610 N. Lincoln Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
| | | | - Rick C. Sasso
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana Spine Group, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abedi A, Formanek B, Russell N, Vizesi F, Boden SD, Wang JC, Buser Z. Examination of the Role of Cells in Commercially Available Cellular Allografts in Spine Fusion: An in Vivo Animal Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102:e135. [PMID: 33079897 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.00330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the extensive use of cellular bone matrices (CBMs) in spine surgery, there is little evidence to support the contribution of cells within CBMs to bone formation. The objective of this study was to determine the contribution of cells to spinal fusion by direct comparisons among viable CBMs, devitalized CBMs, and cell-free demineralized bone matrix (DBM). METHODS Three commercially available grafts were tested: a CBM containing particulate DBM (CBM-particulate), a CBM containing DBM fibers (CBM-fiber), and a cell-free product with DBM fibers only (DBM-fiber). CBMs were used in viable states (CBM-particulatev and CBM-fiberv) and devitalized (lyophilized) states (CBM-particulated and CBM-fiberd), resulting in 5 groups. Viable cell counts and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) content on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) within each graft material were measured. A single-level posterolateral lumbar fusion was performed on 45 athymic rats with 3 lots of each product implanted into 9 animals per group. After 6 weeks, fusion was assessed using manual palpation, micro-computed tomography (μ-CT), and histological analysis. RESULTS The 2 groups with viable cells were comparable with respect to cell counts, and pairwise comparisons showed no significant differences in BMP-2 content across the 5 groups. Manual palpation demonstrated fusion rates of 9 of 9 in the DBM-fiber specimens, 9 of 9 in the CBM-fiberd specimens, 8 of 9 in the CBM-fiberv specimens, and 0 of 9 in both CBM-particulate groups. The μ-CT maturity grade was significantly higher in the DBM-fiber group (2.78 ± 0.55) compared with the other groups (p < 0.0001), while none of the CBM-particulate samples demonstrated intertransverse fusion in qualitative assessments. The viable and devitalized samples in each CBM group were comparable with regard to fusion rates, bone volume fraction, μ-CT maturity grade, and histological features. CONCLUSIONS The cellular component of 2 commercially available CBMs yielded no additional benefits in terms of spinal fusion. Meanwhile, the groups with a fiber-based DBM demonstrated significantly higher fusion outcomes compared with the CBM groups with particulate DBM, indicating that the DBM component is probably the key determinant of fusion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Data from the current study demonstrate that cells yielded no additional benefit in spinal fusion and emphasize the need for well-designed clinical studies on cellular graft materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aidin Abedi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Blake Formanek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | - Scott D Boden
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jeffrey C Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Zorica Buser
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis With Polyetheretherketone Spacers: What is the Role of the Grafting Material? Clin Spine Surg 2020; 33:E539-E544. [PMID: 32324673 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000000995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective study of 2 surgeons' use of a single polyetheretherketone (PEEK) device. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to investigate the fusion adjunct placed within PEEK devices to examine the likelihood of an arthrodesis, regardless of the PEEK interbody device itself. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The effectiveness of PEEK interbody devices in anterior cervical arthrodesis has been questioned. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed the results of 121 patients with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and 96 with local autograft bone placed within identical PEEK devices for anterior cervical arthrodesis (from 2011 to 2018); 1 surgeon used DBM and another local autograft bone. Arthrodesis was determined independently by a surgeon and 2 blinded neuroradiologists. RESULTS For DBM versus autograft; mean age was 60 versus 61 years, smoking status 42.1% versus 31%, diabetes mellitus 18.2% versus 28%, mean body mass index 31 versus 30, and follow up averaged 17 months in both groups. For DBM versus autograft; a radiographic arthrodesis was observed in 22.3% versus 76% of patients. Refusion at the index level was required in 5.8% of the DBM and 0% of the autograft patients. CONCLUSIONS A PEEK interbody device filled with local autograft resulted in a higher radiographic fusion rate and a lower need for reoperation at the index level than an identical device filled with DBM. Caution is warranted in assigning fusion failure to the PEEK device alone in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery.
Collapse
|
10
|
Simpson CR, Kelly HM, Murphy CM. Synergistic use of biomaterials and licensed therapeutics to manipulate bone remodelling and promote non-union fracture repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2020; 160:212-233. [PMID: 33122088 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Disrupted bone metabolism can lead to delayed fracture healing or non-union, often requiring intervention to correct. Although the current clinical gold standard bone graft implants and commercial bone graft substitutes are effective, they possess inherent drawbacks and are limited in their therapeutic capacity for delayed union and non-union repair. Research into advanced biomaterials and therapeutic biomolecules has shown great potential for driving bone regeneration, although few have achieved commercial success or clinical translation. There are a number of therapeutics, which influence bone remodelling, currently licensed for clinical use. Providing an alternative local delivery context for these therapies, can enhance their efficacy and is an emerging trend in bone regenerative therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide an overview of how biomaterial design has advanced from currently available commercial bone graft substitutes to accommodate previously licensed therapeutics that target local bone restoration and healing in a synergistic manner, and the challenges faced in progressing this research towards clinical reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Simpson
- Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helena M Kelly
- Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland; School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ciara M Murphy
- Tissue Engineering Research Group, Department of Anatomy and Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland; Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Trinity College Dublin (TCD), Dublin, Ireland; Advanced Materials and Bioengineering Research Centre (AMBER), RCSI and TCD, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
First Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) Response and Safety Evaluation of Fibrous Demineralized Bone Matrix in a Critical Size Femoral Defect Model of the Sprague-Dawley Rat. MATERIALS 2020; 13:ma13143120. [PMID: 32668732 PMCID: PMC7412543 DOI: 10.3390/ma13143120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of large bone defects is one of the great challenges in contemporary orthopedic and traumatic surgery. Grafts are necessary to support bone healing. A well-established allograft is demineralized bone matrix (DBM) prepared from donated human bone tissue. In this study, a fibrous demineralized bone matrix (f-DBM) with a high surface-to-volume ratio has been analyzed for toxicity and immunogenicity. f-DBM was transplanted to a 5-mm, plate-stabilized, femoral critical-size-bone-defect in Sprague-Dawley (SD)-rats. Healthy animals were used as controls. After two months histology, hematological analyses, immunogenicity as well as serum biochemistry were performed. Evaluation of free radical release and hematological and biochemical analyses showed no significant differences between the control group and recipients of f-DBM. Histologically, there was no evidence of damage to liver and kidney and good bone healing was observed in the f-DBM group. Reactivity against human HLA class I and class II antigens was detected with mostly low fluorescence values both in the serum of untreated and treated animals, reflecting rather a background reaction. Taken together, these results provide evidence for no systemic toxicity and the first proof of no basic immunogenic reaction to bone allograft and no sensitization of the recipient.
Collapse
|
12
|
McCarthy MH, Weiner JA, Patel AA. Strategies to Achieve Spinal Fusion in Multilevel Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: An Overview. HSS J 2020; 16:155-161. [PMID: 32523483 PMCID: PMC7253572 DOI: 10.1007/s11420-019-09738-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior cervical fusion offers surgeons a safe and reliable surgical option for single-level and multilevel pathology; however, multilevel fusions pose a higher risk of complications than single-level fusions, including possible pseudoarthrosis, adjacent segment disease, sagittal imbalance, and construct subsidence. Various techniques can be used to mitigate risk in multilevel anterior cervical fusion. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We reviewed the literature to determine the best surgical strategies in multilevel anterior cervical fusion. METHODS We searched the PubMed database for articles published from January 1980 through July 2019. Two authors identified relevant articles and then manually screened them for others to include in this review. RESULTS We initially identified 1936 articles and included 48 in our review. We found that clinical outcomes of multilevel anterior cervical fusion can be optimized through the use of biologics and graft selection, the evaluation of pre-existing deformity, the assessment of comorbidities, and the selection of fusion levels. Meticulous surgical technique in conjunction with modern surgical tools, such as instrumentation and biologics, allow surgeons to address complex cervical problems while limiting morbidity and enhancing clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Multilevel anterior cervical fusions offer a relatively safe and reliable treatment option for both single-level and multilevel pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael H. McCarthy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. Saint Clair, Suite 1350, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
| | - Joseph A. Weiner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. Saint Clair, Suite 1350, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
| | - Alpesh A. Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. Saint Clair, Suite 1350, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang M, Chou D, Chang CC, Hirpara A, Liu Y, Chan AK, Pennicooke B, Mummaneni PV. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion performed using structural allograft or polyetheretherketone: pseudarthrosis and revision surgery rates with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 32:562-569. [PMID: 31835252 DOI: 10.3171/2019.9.spine19879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Both structural allograft and PEEK have been used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). There are reports that PEEK has a higher pseudarthrosis rate than structural allograft. The authors compared pseudarthrosis, revision, subsidence, and loss of lordosis rates in patients with PEEK and structural allograft. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of patients who were treated with ACDF at their hospital between 2005 and 2017. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with either PEEK or structural allograft, anterior plate fixation, and a minimum 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria were hybrid PEEK and allograft cases, additional posterior surgery, adjacent corpectomies, infection, tumor, stand-alone or integrated screw and cage devices, bone morphogenetic protein use, or lack of a minimum 2-year follow-up. Demographic variables, number of treated levels, interbody type (PEEK cage vs structural allograft), graft packing material, pseudarthrosis rates, revision surgery rates, subsidence, and cervical lordosis changes were collected. These data were analyzed by Pearson's chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test, according to the sample size and expected value) and Student t-test. RESULTS A total of 168 patients (264 levels total, mean follow-up time 39.5 ± 24.0 months) were analyzed. Sixty-one patients had PEEK, and 107 patients had structural allograft. Pseudarthrosis rates for 1-level fusions were 5.4% (PEEK) and 3.4% (allograft) (p > 0.05); 2-level fusions were 7.1% (PEEK) and 8.1% (allograft) (p > 0.05); and ≥ 3-level fusions were 10% (PEEK) and 11.1% (allograft) (p > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the subsidence magnitude between PEEK and allograft in 1-, 2-, and ≥ 3-level ACDF (p > 0.05). Postoperative lordosis loss was not different between cohorts for 1- and 2-level surgeries. CONCLUSIONS In 1- and 2-level ACDF with plating involving the same number of fusion levels, there was no statistically significant difference in the pseudarthrosis rate, revision surgery rate, subsidence, and lordosis loss between PEEK cages and structural allograft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minghao Wang
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Dean Chou
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Chih-Chang Chang
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Ankit Hirpara
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Yilin Liu
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Andrew K Chan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Brenton Pennicooke
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California; and
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Calvert GC, Huffmon GV, Rambo WM, Smith MW, McEntire BJ, Bal BS. Clinical outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with silicon nitride spine cages: a multicenter study. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY (HONG KONG) 2019; 5:504-519. [PMID: 32043001 PMCID: PMC6989924 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intervertebral spacers made of silicon nitride (Si3N4) are currently used in cervical and thoracolumbar fusion. While basic science data demonstrate several advantages of Si3N4 over other biomaterials, large-scale clinical results on its safety and efficacy are lacking. This multicenter retrospective study examined outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using Si3N4 cages. Results were compared to compiled metadata for other ACDF materials. METHODS Pre-operative patient demographics, comorbidities, changes in visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, complications, adverse events, and secondary surgical interventions were collected from the medical records of 860 patients who underwent Si3N4 ACDF at four surgical centers. For comparison, MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar searches were performed for ACDF using other cage or spacer materials. Nine studies with 13 cohorts and 736 patients met the inclusion criteria for this control group. RESULTS Overall, the mean last-follow-up for all patients was 319±325 days (10.6±10.8 months), with the longest follow-up being 6.5 years. In comparison to the metadata, patients from the Si3N4 groups were older (57.9±12.2 vs. 56.8±11.1 y, P=0.06) and had higher BMI values (30.0±6.3 vs. 28.1±6.5, P<0.01), but gender and smoking were not different. The Si3N4 patients reported significant improvements in VAS pain scores at last follow-up (i.e., pre-op of 71.0±22.1 vs. follow-up of 36.4±31.5, P<0.01). Although both preoperative and last-follow-up pain scores were higher for Si3N4 patients than the control, the overall change in scores (ΔVAS) was similar. From pre-op to last-follow up, ΔVAS values were 35.4±34.3 for patients receiving the Si3N4 implants versus 34.4±27.3 for patients from the meta-analysis (P=0.56). The complication and reoperation rate for the Si3N4 and the metadata were also comparable (i.e., 7.39% and 0.31% versus 9.79% and 0%, P=0.17 and 0.25, respectively). CONCLUSIONS ACDF outcomes using Si3N4 implants matched the clinical efficacy of other cage biomaterials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Micah W. Smith
- Ortho Northeast, 11130 Parkview Plaza Dr., Fort Wayne, IN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Partial Vertebrae Resection Laterally to Harvest Supplemental Autograft Bone for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Technical Note and Outcomes. World Neurosurg 2018; 121:44-50. [PMID: 30267944 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Revised: 09/16/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of partial vertebrae resection laterally through intervertebral space to harvest supplemental autograft bone for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS Patients who accepted 1-segment (n = 19, 38.2 months follow-up) or 2-segment (n = 17, 40.4 months follow-up) ACDF with supplemental autograft bone were included. Cervical lordosis (CL), segmental lordosis (SL), anterior segment height (ASH), and posterior segment height (PSH) on neutrally lateral radiography, and intervertebral fusion rate on computed tomography were measured. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, Japanese Orthopedic Association score, visual analog scale around the neck or arm, Neck Disability Index, and complications were also recorded. RESULTS Mean operation time was 86.2 and 115.6 minutes, and the intraoperative blood loss was 41.7 and 79.4 mL in cases with 1-segment and 2-segment ACDF, respectively. At the final visit, the visual analog scale score and Neck Disability Index significantly decreased, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association score significantly increased. Significant increases were observed in the ASH, PSH, CL, and SL after 2-segment ACDF. Significant increases were observed in the CL and SL after 1-segment ACDF, but not in the ASH and PSH. All the ASH, PSH, CL, and SL kept unchanged at the final visit. All cases acquired definite intervertebral fusion, and the incidence of cage subsidence was 5.3% after 1-segment and 17.6% after 2-segment ACDF at the final visit. CONCLUSIONS Partial vertebrae resection laterally through the intervertebral space was a safe and effective method to harvest supplemental autograft bone for the ACDF.
Collapse
|
16
|
Muzević D, Splavski B, Boop FA, Arnautović KI. Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Instrumented Allograft Fusion: Lordosis Restoration and Comparison of Functional Outcomes among Patients of Different Age Groups. World Neurosurg 2018; 109:e233-e243. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Revised: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/21/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
17
|
Le BQ, Nurcombe V, Cool SM, van Blitterswijk CA, de Boer J, LaPointe VLS. The Components of Bone and What They Can Teach Us about Regeneration. MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2017; 11:E14. [PMID: 29271933 PMCID: PMC5793512 DOI: 10.3390/ma11010014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The problem of bone regeneration has engaged both physicians and scientists since the beginning of medicine. Not only can bone heal itself following most injuries, but when it does, the regenerated tissue is often indistinguishable from healthy bone. Problems arise, however, when bone does not heal properly, or when new tissue is needed, such as when two vertebrae are required to fuse to stabilize adjacent spine segments. Despite centuries of research, such procedures still require improved therapeutic methods to be devised. Autologous bone harvesting and grafting is currently still the accepted benchmark, despite drawbacks for clinicians and patients that include limited amounts, donor site morbidity, and variable quality. The necessity for an alternative to this "gold standard" has given rise to a bone-graft and substitute industry, with its central conundrum: what is the best way to regenerate bone? In this review, we dissect bone anatomy to summarize our current understanding of its constituents. We then look at how various components have been employed to improve bone regeneration. Evolving strategies for bone regeneration are then considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bach Quang Le
- Institute of Medical Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 8A Biomedical Grove, #6-06 Immunos, Singapore 138648, Singapore.
| | - Victor Nurcombe
- Institute of Medical Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 8A Biomedical Grove, #6-06 Immunos, Singapore 138648, Singapore.
| | - Simon McKenzie Cool
- Institute of Medical Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 8A Biomedical Grove, #6-06 Immunos, Singapore 138648, Singapore.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119288, Singapore.
| | - Clemens A van Blitterswijk
- Department of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Jan de Boer
- Department of Cell Biology-Inspired Tissue Engineering, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Vanessa Lydia Simone LaPointe
- Department of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van der Stok J, Hartholt KA, Schoenmakers DAL, Arts JJC. The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review. Bone Joint Res 2017; 6:423-432. [PMID: 28733366 PMCID: PMC5539308 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.bjr-2017-0027.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical level of evidence of commercially available demineralised bone matrix (DBM) products for their use in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery. Methods A total of 17 DBM products were used as search terms in two available databases: Embase and PubMed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. All articles that reported the clinical use of a DBM-product in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery were included. Results The literature search resulted in 823 manuscripts of which 64 manuscripts met the final inclusion criteria. The included manuscripts consisted of four randomised controlled trials (level I), eight cohort studies (level III) and 49 case-series (level IV). No clinical studies were found for ten DBM products, and most DBM products were only used in combination with other grafting materials. DBM products were most extensively investigated in spinal surgery, showing limited level I evidence that supports the use Grafton DBM (Osteotech, Eatontown, New Jersey) as a bone graft extender in posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery. DBM products are not thoroughly investigated in trauma surgery, showing mainly level IV evidence that supports the use of Allomatrix (Wright Medical, London, United Kingdom), DBX (DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland), Grafton DBM, or OrthoBlast (Citagenix Laval, Canada) as bone graft extenders. Conclusions The clinical level of evidence that supports the use of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery is limited and consists mainly of poor quality and retrospective case-series. More prospective, randomised controlled trials are needed to understand the clinical effect and impact of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Cite this article: J. van der Stok, K. A. Hartholt, D. A. L. Schoenmakers, J. J. C. Arts. The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systemati c review. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:423–432. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J van der Stok
- Department of Orthopaedics, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, and Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K A Hartholt
- Department of Surgery-Traumatology, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - D A L Schoenmakers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI Research School, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J J C Arts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI Research School, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands, and The Orthopaedic Biomechanics Group, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|