Global alignment and proportion (GAP) scores in an asymptomatic, nonoperative cohort: a divergence of age-adjusted and pelvic incidence-based alignment targets

Impact of postoperative spinal malalignment on postoperative health-related quality of life after long-level fixation for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: does residual coronal angularity matter?

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the influence of spinal malalignment on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in a long-level fusion spine.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 121 consecutive patients with DLS after long-segment fusion. HRQOL and radiographic parameters were collected at final follow-up. For postoperative residual Cobb angle (CA), patients were divided as follows: group (0) (CA < 10°), group (+) (CA 10°∼20 °), and group (++) (CA > 20°). For postoperative coronal vertical axis (CVA), patients were separated as follows: group (0) (CVA < 2 cm), group (+) (CVA 2 ∼ 3 cm), and group (++) (CVA > 3 cm). Patients were also grouped by the sagittal modifiers as group (0), group (+), and group (++) according to the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification, respectively.

RESULTS

Visual analog scale (VAS) for back was significantly lower in CA 10°∼20° group compared to other groups. Patients with remnant CA > 20° showed worse Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), SRS-22 and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) - physical component scores (PCS). Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) showed significant correlation with HRQOLs after surgery, and the statistical significance of ODI, SRS-22 and SF-36 scores was observed among subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In long-level fused spine, residual CA > 20° resulted in worse clinical outcomes and was recommended to avoid during surgery. And 10° to 20° residual CA was acceptable in DLS patients and even better than Cobb angle < 10° in several HRQOLs, therefore strictly pursing upright alignment seems unnecessary. SVA also showed effectiveness in assessing HRQOL in the fixed spine.

Characteristics of Spinal Morphology According to the Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study

STUDY DESIGN

Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) cohort: prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the distribution of GAP scores in the MEANS cohort and compare the spinal shape via stratification by GAP alignment category, age, and country.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The GAP score has been used to categorize spinal morphology and prognosticate adult spinal deformity surgical outcomes and mechanical complications. We analyzed a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort to assess the distribution of GAP scores.

METHODS

Four hundred sixty-seven healthy volunteers without spinal disorders were recruited in five countries. Sagittal radiographic parameters were measured via the EOS imaging system. The GAP total and constituent factor scores were calculated for each patient. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was performed to compare variables across groups, followed by the post hoc Games-Howell test. Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables. The significance level was set to P <0.05.

RESULTS

In the MEANS cohort, 13.7% (64/467) of volunteers were ≥60 years old, and 86.3% (403/467) were <60 years old. 76.9% (359/467) was proportioned, 19.5% (91/467) was moderately disproportioned, and 3.6% (17/467) was severely disproportioned. There was no significant difference in the frequency of proportioned, moderately, or severely disproportioned GAP between subjects from different countries ( P =0.060). Those with severely disproportioned GAP alignment were on average 14.5 years older ( P =0.016), had 23.1° lower magnitude lumbar lordosis (LL) ( P <0.001), 14.2° higher pelvic tilt ( P <0.001), 13.3° lower sacral slope ( P <0.001), and 24.1° higher pelvic-incidence (PI)-LL mismatch ( P <0.001), 18.2° higher global tilt ( P <0.001) than those with proportioned GAP; thoracic kyphosis and PI were not significantly different ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The GAP system applies to a large, multiethnic, asymptomatic cohort. Spinal alignment should be considered on a spectrum, as 19.5% of the asymptomatic volunteers were classified as moderately disproportioned and 3.6% severely disproportioned. Radiographic malalignment does not always indicate symptoms or pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Development of ethnicity-adjusted global alignment and proportion score to predict the risk of mechanical complications following corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Surgery for degenerative scoliosis (DS) is a complex procedure with high complication and revision rates. Based on the concept that pelvic incidence (PI) is a constant parameter, the global alignment and proportional (GAP) score was developed from sagittal alignment data collected in the Caucasian populations to predict mechanical complications. However, the PI varies among different ethnic groups, and the GAP score may not apply to Chinese populations. Thus, this study aims to assess the predictability of the GAP score for mechanical complications in the Chinese populations and develop an ethnicity-adjusted GAP score.

PURPOSE

To test the predictability of the original GAP score in the Chinese population and develop a Chinese ethnicity-tailored GAP scoring system.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGS

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 560 asymptomatic healthy volunteers were enrolled to develop Chinese ethnicity-tailored GAP (C-GAP) score and a total of 114 DS patients were enrolled to test the predictability of original GAP score and C-GAP score.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographic information, sagittal spinopelvic parameters of healthy volunteers and DS patients were collected. Mechanical complications were recorded at a minimum of 2-year follow-up after corrective surgery for DS patients.

METHODS

A total of 560 asymptomatic healthy volunteers with a mean age of 61.9±14.1 years were enrolled to develop ethnicity-adjusted GAP score. Besides, 114 surgically trated DS patients (M/F=10/104) with a mean age of 60.7±7.1 years were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data and radiological parameters of both groups, including PI, lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and global tilt (GT) were collected. Ideal LL, SS, and GT were obtained by calculating their correlation with PI of healthy volunteers using linear regression analysis. Relative pelvic version (RPV), relative lumbar lordosis (RLL), lordosis distribution index (LDI), and relative spinopelvic alignment (RSA) were obtained using the ideal parameters, and the Chinese population adjusted GAP score (C-GAP) was developed based on these values. The predictability of original and C-GAP for mechanical failure was evaluated using clinical and radiological data of DS patients by evaluating the area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic curve. This study was supported the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 82272545), ($ 8,000-10,000) and the Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Center, and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M701677), Level B ($ 5,000-7,000).

RESULTS

Ideal SS=0.53×PI+9 (p=.002), ideal LL=0.48×PI+22 (p=.023) and ideal GT=0.46 × PI-9 (p=.011). were obtained by correlation analysis using sagittal parameters from those healthy volunteers, and RPV, RLL, RSA, and LDI were calculated accordingly. Then, the ethnicity-adjusted C-GAP score was developed by summing up the numeric value of calculated RPV, RLL, RSA, and LDI. The AUC was classified as ''no or low discriminatory power'' for the original GAP score in predicting mechanical complications (AUC=0.592, p=.078). Similarly, the original GAP score did not correlate with mechanical complications in DS patients. According to the C-GAP score, the sagittal parameters were proportional in 25 (21.9%) cases, moderately disproportional in 68 (59.6%), and severely disproportional in 21% (18.5%) cases. The incidence of mechanical complications was statistically different among proportioned and moderately disproportional and severely disproportional portions of the C-GAP score (p=.03). The predictability of the C-GAP score is high with an AUC=0.773 (p<.001). In addition, there is a linear correlation between mechanical complication rate and C-GAP score (χ=0.102, p=.02).

CONCLUSION

The Ethnicity-adjusted C-GAP score system developed in the current study provided a more accurate and reliable for predicting the risk of mechanical complications after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Clinical significance of relative pelvic version measurement as a predictor of low back pain after total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between the preoperative global alignment and proportion (GAP) score and low back pain (LBP) after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of 200 patients who underwent primary unilateral THA for hip osteoarthritis. The following variables were compared between individuals with (n = 76) and without (n = 124) LBP after THA over a mean follow-up of 2 years: age, sex, GAP score, and patient-reported outcome measures. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to detect predictive factors.

RESULTS

The following parameters were predictive of post-THA LBP: relative pelvic version (RPV) <-7° (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.72; P = 0.032) and relative lumbar lordosis <-15° (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.13; P = 0.041) preoperatively. Using an RPV cutoff value of - 7° (specificity 61/64 = 0.953; sensitivity 121/136 = 0.890), there were significant between-group differences in LBP visual analog scale (P = 0.020), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, P = 0.014), EuroQol 5-Dimension (P = 0.027), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (HOOS JR, P = 0.012), patient satisfaction (P = 0.024). There was clinically meaningful improvement for LBP visual analog scale (P = 0.001), ODI (P = 0.004), and HOOS JR (P < 0.001). The RPV before THA was correlated with HOOS JR (r = 0.773, P = 0.012) and ODI (r = - 0.602, P = 0.032) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Among the GAP score, a moderate-to-severe pelvic retroversion was significantly associated with LBP post-THA. The RPV measurement may be a useful predictor of THA outcome, which may influence patient satisfaction.

Algorithmic Patient Selection for Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery

Evidenced-based data-driven decision-making algorithms guide patient and approach selection for adult spinal deformity surgery. Algorithms are continually refined as surgical goals and intraoperative technology evolve.

Lumbar Lordosis Distribution in Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers: A Systematic Review

Background

Restoring lumbar lordosis is important for adult spinal deformity surgery. Several reports have suggested that lumbar lordosis distribution has a significant impact on the outcome of surgery, including lumbar distribution index (LDI), proximal lumbar lordosis (PLL), and distal lumbar lordosis (DLL). The features of lumbar lordosis distribution are inconclusive in asymptomatic adults.

Questions/Purposes

We sought to evaluate the variation of lumbar lordosis distribution (LDI, PLL, and DLL) and to identify associated factors in asymptomatic adult volunteers.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of the Embase and Medline databases to identify studies in asymptomatic adult volunteers to evaluate lumbar lordosis distribution including LDI, PLL, and DLL.

Results

Twelve articles met eligibility criteria and were included in our review. The respective pooled estimates of mean and variance, respectively, were 65.10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.61-67.58) and 13.70% in LDI, 16.51° (95% CI: 5.54-27.49) and 11.46° in PLL, and 35.47° (95% CI: 32.79-38.18) and 9.10° in DLL. Lumbar lordosis distribution was associated with race, age, sex, body mass index, pelvic incidence, and Roussouly classification.

Conclusions

This systematic review found that despite a wide variation in LDI and PLL, DLL is maintained in a narrower range in asymptomatic adult volunteers, especially in white populations. Distal lumbar lordosis may be a more reliable radiographic parameter to restore the lumbar lordosis distribution in preoperative planning.

Sagittal alignment cut-off values for predicting future fall-related fractures in community-dwelling osteoporotic women

PURPOSE

Determining the optimal cut-off value of sagittal alignment for detecting osteoporotic patients at high risk for fall-related fractures is essential for understanding fracture risk and informing clinicians and physical therapists. We determined the optimal cut-off value of sagittal alignment for detecting osteoporotic patients at high risk for fall-related fractures in this study.

METHODS

In the retrospective cohort study, we enrolled a total of 255 women aged ≥ 65 years who visited an outpatient osteoporosis clinic. We measured participants' bone mineral density and sagittal alignment, including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt, thoracic kyphosis, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, global tilt, and gap score at the initial visit. The cut-off value for sagittal alignment that was significantly associated with fall-related fractures was calculated after using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 192 patients were included in the analysis. After a mean follow-up of 3.0 years, 12.0% (n = 23) had fractures due to falls. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that SVA (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.022, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.005-1.039) was the only independent predictor of fall-related fracture occurrence. The predictive ability of SVA for the occurrence of fall-related fractures was moderate (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.728, 95% CI = 0.623-0.834), with a cut-off value of 100 mm for SVA. SVA classified by cut-off value was also associated with an increased risk of developing fall-related fractures (HR = 17.002, 95% CI = 4.102-70.475).

CONCLUSION

We found that assessing the cut-off value of sagittal alignment would be useful information in understanding fracture risk in postmenopausal older women.

Sagittal alignment cut-off values for predicting future fall-related fractures in community-dwelling osteoporotic women

PURPOSE

Determining the optimal cut-off value of sagittal alignment for detecting osteoporotic patients at high risk for fall-related fractures is essential for understanding fracture risk and informing clinicians and physical therapists. We determined the optimal cut-off value of sagittal alignment for detecting osteoporotic patients at high risk for fall-related fractures in this study.

METHODS

In the retrospective cohort study, we enrolled a total of 255 women aged ≥ 65 years who visited an outpatient osteoporosis clinic. We measured participants' bone mineral density and sagittal alignment, including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt, thoracic kyphosis, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, global tilt, and gap score at the initial visit. The cut-off value for sagittal alignment that was significantly associated with fall-related fractures was calculated after using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 192 patients were included in the analysis. After a mean follow-up of 3.0 years, 12.0% (n = 23) had fractures due to falls. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that SVA (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.022, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.005-1.039) was the only independent predictor of fall-related fracture occurrence. The predictive ability of SVA for the occurrence of fall-related fractures was moderate (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.728, 95% CI = 0.623-0.834), with a cut-off value of 100 mm for SVA. SVA classified by cut-off value was also associated with an increased risk of developing fall-related fractures (HR = 17.002, 95% CI = 4.102-70.475).

CONCLUSION

We found that assessing the cut-off value of sagittal alignment would be useful information in understanding fracture risk in postmenopausal older women.

The Effects of Global Alignment and Proportionality Scores on Postoperative Outcomes After Adult Spinal Deformity Correction

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested achieving global alignment and proportionality (GAP) alignment may influence mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between the GAP score and mechanical complications after ASD surgery.

METHODS

Patients with ASD with at least 5-level fusion to pelvis and minimum 2-year data were included. Multivariate analysis was used to find an association between proportioned (P), GAP-moderately disproportioned, and severely disproportioned (GAP-SD) states and mechanical complications (inclusive of proximal junctional kyphosis [PJK], proximal junctional failure [PJF], and implant-related complications [IC]). Severe sagittal deformity was defined by a "++" in the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab criteria for sagittal vertebral axis or pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety patients with ASD were included. Controlling for age, Charlson comorbidity index, invasiveness and baseline deformity, and multivariate analysis showed no association of GAP-moderately disproportioned patients with proximal junctional kyphosis, PJF, or IC, while GAP-SD patients showed association with IC (odds ratio [OR]: 1.7, [1.1-3.3]; P = .043). Aligning in GAP-relative pelvic version led to lower likelihood of all 3 mechanical complications (all P < .04). In patients with severe sagittal deformity, GAP-SD was predictive of IC (OR: 2.1, [1.1-4.7]; P = .047), and in patients 70 years and older, GAP-SD was also predictive of PJF development (OR: 2.5, [1.1-14.9]; P = .045), while improving in GAP led to lower likelihood of PJF (OR: 0.2, [0.02-0.8]; P = .023).

CONCLUSION

Severely disproportioned in GAP is associated with development of any IC and junctional failure specifically in older patients and those with severe baseline deformity. Therefore, incorporation of patient-specific factors into realignment goals may better strengthen the utility of this novel tool.

Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score in asymptomatic individuals: is it universal?

BACKGROUND

The global alignment and proportion (GAP) score was established based on American and European subjects, which might limit its applicability to the Chinese population due to ethnicity-related difference of sagittal alignment.

PURPOSE

To analyze the applicability of GAP score in the Chinese population and to investigate the age- and gender-associated differences of spinopelvic and GAP score parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cross-sectional radiographic study.

PATIENTS SAMPLE

Of 692 asymptomatic Chinese volunteers aged between 20 and 79 prospectively recruited between January 2017 and June 2019, 490 subjects were eventually included in this study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), L1-S1 lordosis, L4-S1 lordosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA) and global tilt (GT) were measured on lateral X-rays. The GAP scores and its parameters including relative pelvic version (RPV), relative lumbar lordosis (RLL), lordosis distribution index (LDI) and relative spinopelvic alignment (RSA) were calculated for each subject.

METHODS

Subjects were divided into four groups: Group 1M: male subjects <60 years old; Group 1F: female subjects <60 years old; Group 2M: male subjects ≥60 years old and Group 2F: female subjects ≥60 years old. The GAP scores and categories were determined and compared between groups. The results of sagittal alignment were compared with the previous studies evaluating the normative sagittal alignment in other populations. Univariate linear regression analysis was carried out between pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL) and global tilt (GT) in each group.

RESULTS

The distributions of GAP categories and the updated Roussouly classification were statistically different from other populations. Significantly different distribution of GAP categories was observed between Group 1M and Group 2M, Group 1F and Group 2F, and Group 1M and Group 1F. Radiographic measurements and GAP parameters were significantly different between Group 1M and Group 2M, and Group 1F and Group 2F. Gender-related difference of parameters was more prominent between Group 1M and Group 1F. Linear relationship of PI with SS, LL and GT were different from the regression models of "ideal" sagittal alignment in GAP score.

CONCLUSIONS

The GAP score might be inappropriate in Chinese population due to ethnicity-related alignment difference. Worse feasibility of GAP score was observed in female and old subjects.

Are Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeons or Classical Open Spine Surgeons More Consistent with Their Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity?

OBJECTIVE

Spine surgeons have a heuristic sense of how to surgically restore alignment and address adult spinal deformity (ASD) symptoms, but consensus on the extent of treatment remains unclear. We sought to determine the variability of surgical approaches in treating ASD.

METHODS

Sixteen spine surgeons were surveyed on treatment approaches in 10 select ASD cases. We repeated the survey with the same surgeons 4 weeks later, with cases ordered differently. We examined the variability in length of construct, use of interbody spacers, osteotomies, and pelvic fixation frequency.

RESULTS

Treatment approaches for each case varied by surgeon, with some surgeons opting for long fusion constructs in cases for which others offered no surgery. There was no consensus among surgeons on the number of levels fused, interbody spacer use, or anterior/posterior osteotomies. Intersurgeon and intrasurgeon variability was 48% (kappa = 0.31) and 59% (kappa = 0.44) for surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus 37% (kappa = 0.21) and 47% (kappa = 0.30) for those performing open surgery. In the second-round survey, 8 of 15 (53%) surgeons substantially changed the construct length, number of interbody spacers, and osteotomies in at least half the cases they previously reviewed. Surgeons performing MIS versus open surgery were less likely to extend constructs to the pelvis (42.5% vs. 67.5%; P = 0.02), but construct length was not correlated with whether a surgeon performed MIS or open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal deformity surgeons lack consensus on the optimal surgical approach for treating ASD. Classifying surgeons as performing MIS or open surgery does not mitigate this variability.

State of the art advances in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) can be associated with substantial suffering due to pain and disability. Surgical intervention for achieving neural decompression and restoring physiological spinal alignment has shown to result in significant improvement in pain and disability through patient-reported outcomes. Traditional open approaches involving posterior osteotomy techniques and instrumentation are effective based on clinical outcomes but associated with high complication rates, even in the hands of the most experienced surgeons. Minimally invasive techniques may offer benefit while decreasing associated morbidity. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for ASD has evolved over the past 20 years, driven by improved understanding of open procedures along with novel technique development and technologic advancements. Early efforts were hindered due to suboptimal outcomes resulting from high pseudarthrosis, inadequate correction, and fixation failure rates. To address this, multi-center collaborative groups have been established to study large numbers of ASD patients which have been vital to understanding optimal patient selection and individualized management strategies. Different MIS decision-making algorithms have been described to better define appropriate candidates and interbody selection approaches in ASD. The purpose of this state of the review is to describe the evolution of MIS surgery for adult deformity with emphasis on landmark papers, and to discuss specific MIS technology for ASD, including percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation, hyperlordotic grafts, three-dimensional navigation, and robotics.