Association of age with the timing of acute spine surgery-effects on neurological outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury

Therapeutic efficacy of adrenergic agents on systemic and spinal hemodynamics in an acute cervical spinal cord injury rodent model

BACKGROUND

Cervical spinal cord injury usually results in cardiorespiratory dysfunctions due to interruptions of the bulbospinal pathways innervating the cervical phrenic motoneurons and thoracic sympathetic preganglionic neurons.

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of adrenergic agents on systemic and spinal hemodynamics during acute cervical spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN

In vivo animal study.

METHODS

The cardiorespiratory function and spinal cord blood flow and oxygenation level were monitored in response to cervical spinal cord contusion and intravenous infusion of three types of adrenergic agents (phenylephrine, dobutamine, and norepinephrine).

RESULTS

Cervical spinal cord contusion resulted in immediate reduction of respiratory airflow, arterial blood pressure, and spinal cord blood flow. The arterial blood pressure and spinal cord blood flow remained lower than the pre-injury value in contused animals infused with saline at 60 min post-injury. Infusion of phenylephrine (500, 1000, and 2000 μg/kg) and norepinephrine (125, 250, and 500 μg/kg) significantly increased the arterial blood pressure, while only norepinephrine augmented the spinal cord blood flow. Conversely, dobutamine (1000 and 2000 μg/kg) reduced both arterial blood pressure and spinal cord blood flow. Notably, administration of adrenergic agents tended to increase spinal cord hemorrhage in contused animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Infusion of norepinephrine can effectively maintain the blood pressure and improve spinal cord blood flow during acute spinal cord injury.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Norepinephrine may be a superior medicine for hemodynamic management; however, the potential hemorrhage should be considered when utilizing the vasopressor to regulate systemic and spinal hemodynamics at the acute injured stage.

Evolving trends in the surgical, anaesthetic, and intensive care management of acute spinal cord injuries in the UK

PURPOSE

We surveyed the treatment of acute spinal cord injuries in the UK and compared current practices with 10 years ago.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey was conducted amongst neurosurgeons, neuroanaesthetists, and neurointensivists that manage patients with acute spinal cord injuries. The survey gave two scenarios (complete and incomplete cervical spinal cord injuries). We obtained opinions on the speed of transfer, timing and aim of surgery, choice of anaesthetic, intraoperative monitoring, targets for physiological parameters, and drug treatments.

RESULTS

We received responses from 78.6% of UK units that manage acute spinal cord injuries (33 neurosurgeons, 56 neuroanaesthetists/neurointensivists). Most neurosurgeons operate within 12 h for incomplete (82%) and complete (64%) injuries. There is a significant shift from 10 years ago, when only 61% (incomplete) and 30% (complete) of neurosurgeons operated within 12 h. The preferred anaesthetic technique in 2022 is total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA), used by 69% of neuroanaesthetists. Significantly more intraoperative monitoring is now used at least sometimes, including bispectral index (91%), non-invasive cardiac output (62%), and neurophysiology (73-77%). Methylprednisolone is no longer used by surgeons. Achieving at least 80 mmHg mean arterial blood pressure is recommended by 70% neurosurgeons, 62% neuroanaesthetists, and 75% neurointensivists.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 2012 and 2022, there was a paradigm shift in managing acute spinal cord injuries in the UK with earlier surgery and more intraoperative monitoring. Variability in practice persists due to lack of high-quality evidence and consensus guidelines.

Risk factors of AIS C incomplete cervical spinal cord injury for poor prognosis-The significance of anorectal evaluation

BACKGROUND

Although the prognosis of incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) diagnosed as American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade C (AIS C) is generally favorable, some patients remain non-ambulatory. The present study explored the clinical factors associated with the non-ambulatory state of AIS C patients.

METHODS

This study was a single-center retrospective observational study. Seventy-three participants with AIS C on admission were enrolled and divided into two groups according to ambulatory ability after one year. Prognostic factors of SCI were compared in ambulatory (A-group) and non-ambulatory participants (NA-group). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed on demographic information, medical history, mechanism of injury, presence of fracture, ASIA motor scores (MS) of the extremities, neurological findings, including an anorectal examination on admission, and imaging findings.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included in the A-group and 32 in the NA-group. Univariable analysis revealed that the following factors were related to poor outcomes (p < 0.05): older age, history of cerebrovascular disorder, impairment/absence of S4-5 sensory score, deep anal pressure (DAP) (-), voluntary anal contraction (VAC) (-), anorectal tone (-), anal wink reflex (-), and low MS of the upper and lower extremities. In the multivariable analysis using age, presence or absence of sacral abnormality, and history of cerebrovascular disorders (adjusted for these three factors), older age and presence of sacral abnormality on admission were independent risk factors for a non-ambulatory state at the 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Incomplete AIS C SCI individuals with older age and/or impairment of anorectal examination could remain non-ambulatory at 1-year follow-up.

A dynamic nomogram for predicting the probability of irreversible neurological dysfunction after cervical spinal cord injury: research based on clinical features and MRI data

BACKGROUND

Irreversible neurological dysfunction (IND) is an adverse event after cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). However, there is still a shortage of objective criteria for the early prediction of neurological function. We aimed to screen independent predictors of IND and use these findings to construct a nomogram that could predict the development of neurological function in CSCI patients.

METHODS

Patients with CSCI attending the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University between January 2014 and March 2021 were included in this study. We divided the patients into two groups: reversible neurological dysfunction (RND) and IND. The independent predictors of IND in CSCI patients were screened using the regularization technique to construct a nomogram, which was finally converted into an online calculator. Concordance index (C-index), calibration curves analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) evaluated the model's discrimination, calibration, and clinical applicability. We tested the nomogram in an external validation cohort and performed internal validation using the bootstrap method.

RESULTS

We enrolled 193 individuals with CSCI in this study, including IND (n = 75) and RND (n = 118). Six features, including age, American spinal injury association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade, signal of spinal cord (SC), maximum canal compromise (MCC), intramedullary lesion length (IMLL), and specialized institution-based rehabilitation (SIBR), were included in the model. The C-index of 0.882 from the training set and its externally validated value of 0.827 demonstrated the model's prediction accuracy. Meanwhile, the model has satisfactory actual consistency and clinical applicability, verified in the calibration curve and DCA.

CONCLUSION

We constructed a prediction model based on six clinical and MRI features that can be used to assess the probability of developing IND in patients with CSCI.

The Effect of Anterior-Only, Posterior-Only, and Combined Anterior Posterior Fixation for Cervical Spine Injury with Soft Tissue Injury: A Finite Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This finite element analysis aimed to investigate the effects of surgical procedures for cervical spine injury.

METHODS

A three-dimensional finite element model of the cervical spine (C2-C7) was created from computed tomography. This model contained vertebrae, intervertebral discs, anterior longitudinal ligament, and posterior ligament complex. To create the cervical spine injury model, posterior ligament complex and anterior longitudinal ligament at C3-C4 were resected and the center of the intervertebral disc was resected. We created posterior-only fixation (PF), anterior-only fixation (AF), and combined anterior-posterior fixation (APF) models. A pure moment with a compressive follower load was applied, and range of motion, annular/nucleus stress, instrument stress, and facet forces were analyzed.

RESULTS

In all motion except for flexion, range of motion of PF, AF, and APF models decreased by 80%-95%, 85%-93%, and 97%-99% compared with the intact model. C3-C4 annulus stress of PF, AF, and APF models decreased by 28%-72%, 96%-100%, and 99%-100% compared with the intact model. Facet contact forces of PF, AF, and APF models decreased by 77%-79%, 97%-99%, and 77%-86% at C3-C4 compared with the intact model. Screw stress in the PF model was higher than in the APF model, and plate stress in the AF model was lower than in the APF model, but bone graft stress in the AF model was higher than in the APF model.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical stabilization was preserved by the APF model. Regarding range of motion, the PF model had an advantage compared with the AF model except for flexion. An understanding of biomechanics provides useful information for the clinician.