How to select the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke 5/6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with derotation technique

Is It Enough to Stop Distal Fusion at L3 in Mild to Moderate Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients?

OBJECTIVE

There has been no definitive conclusion on the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether it is enough to stop distal fusion at L3 in mild to moderate Lenke 5C AIS patients with posterior selective lumbar fusion, Ponte osteotomies and segmental direct vertebra rotation and to analyze the risk factors for postoperative complications in patients selecting L3 as the LIV.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 106 Lenke 5C AIS patients who underwent corrective surgery in our institution from 2010 to 2021, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The LIV was L3 or L4. According to the LIV, patients were initially divided into Group I (the LIV was L3) and Group II (the LIV was L4). Then, Group I was further divided into a complication group and a non-complication group. Demographics, radiological parameters, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic analysis were used to identify the risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with L3 as the LIV.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the demographics, radiological parameters, postoperative complications, or clinical outcomes between Group I and Group II (p > 0.05), and the outcomes were satisfactory in both groups. The main postoperative complications were distal adding-on (11 cases), coronal imbalance (16 cases), proximal junctional kyphosis (2 cases), and internal fixation failure (4 cases). Logistic regression analysis revealed that age and postoperative C7-CSVL were independent predictors of postoperative complications when selecting L3 as the LIV.

CONCLUSION

Terminating the distal fusion level at L3 was practical for mild to moderate Lenke 5C AIS patients. For patients selecting L3 as the LIV, younger patients should be cautious, and maintaining postoperative coronal balance is necessary for avoiding postoperative complications.

Comparison between the lowest instrumented vertebrae L3 with the use of direct vertebrae rotation (DVR) and the lowest instrumented vertebrae L4 for non-DVR in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis Lenke 5C/6C: when LEV is L4

OBJECTIVE

As there are no substantial selection criteria for determining the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) Lenke 5C/6C, thus, many surgeons base their selection on experience. The study aims to compare the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV) lumbar vertebra three (L3) with the use of direct vertebrae rotation (DVR) to the lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV) lumbar vertebra four (L4) with the use of non-DVR for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) Lenke 5C/6C when the lower end vertebrae (LEV) is at lumbar vertebrae four (L4).

METHODS

This prospective study involved 101 patients who were divided into two groups based on different techniques. The patients were prospectively followed up for at least four years. All patients included in the study had a lower end vertebra (LEV) at L4, while patients older than 18 years and patients with prior surgical procedures were excluded. The DVR group consisted of 49 patients, and the non-DVR group included 51 patients.

RESULTS

The preoperative mean LIV disc angle was 3.1 ± 3 and 3.1 ± 1, P = 0.097, which corrected to 1.2 ± 0 and 1.1 ± 0 in both groups at 4-year follow-up without statistical significance. The LIVDA and LIVT were statistically insignificant at the preoperative, and there were no significant differences at the follow-up visitation. The DVR group achieved a satisfactory coronal and Cobb's angle correction compared to the NDVR group; however, there were no statistical differences at the follow-up visitations. Both groups achieve a satisfactory correction rate without substantial significance in clinical and radiological outcomes. Furthermore, no post-surgical complications were recorded in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

DVR is suitable for selecting L3 as the LIV in AIS Lenke 5C/6C compared to L4 in non-DVR. DVR preserved more segments without substantial complications during the follow-up visitations. Nevertheless, both groups will continue to be followed up to prevent adding-on post-surgical complications.

Comparable rates of lumbar disc degeneration at long-term following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis spinal fusion extended to L3 or L4: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) requires a careful choice of fusion levels. The usual recommendation for the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) for double major or thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves falls on L3 or L4. The aim of the present study is to assess if the spinal fusion with LIV selection of L3 or L4 in AIS patients has a clinical or radiological impact in terms of degenerative disc disease (DDD) in distal unfused segments at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases from eligible articles was conducted. Only studies regarding long-term follow-up of AIS patients treated with spinal fusion were included. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were extracted and summarized. Meta-analysis on long-term follow-up MRI studies was performed. p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included, for a total of 1264 patients. Clinical assessment of included patients showed a slight tendency to have worse clinical outcomes if spinal fusion is extended to L4 rather than L3. Despite that, meta-analysis could not be performed on clinical parameters because of heterogeneity of evaluated PROMs in included studies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation at long-term follow-up showed no significant difference in terms of disc degeneration rate at overall meta-analysis (p = 0.916) between patients fused to L3 and L4.

CONCLUSION

The LIV selection of L3 rather than L4, according to current literature, does not prevent disc degeneration in distal unfused segments over the long term. Long-term studies of patients treated with contemporary spinal instrumentation are needed.

Factors that influence in-brace derotation effects in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study based on EOS imaging system

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of bracing on apical vertebral derotation and explore the factors that influence in-brace derotation effects in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. For patients with AIS, vertebral rotation causes cosmetic appearance abnormalities and acts as an indicator for curve progression. However, there have been few studies investigating the precise derotation effects of bracing for apical vertebra. The application of EOS imaging system enables quantitative evaluation of vertebral rotation in the axial plane in a standing position.

METHODS

There were 82 eligible patients enrolled in current study, who underwent EOS imaging evaluation before and immediately after bracing. The clinical demographic data (age, gender, Risser sign and menstrual status) were recorded. The correlation analyses between derotation effects and key parameters (age, pre-brace Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, vertebral rotation, pelvis axial rotation and apical vertebral level) were performed. The in-brace derotation effects stratified by gender, Risser sign, apical vertebral level, menarche status, coronal balance and sagittal balance were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The rotation of apical vertebra was decreased from 8.8 ± 6.0 degrees before bracing to 3.8 ± 3.3 degrees immediately after bracing (p < 0.001), and the derotation rate was 49.2 ± 38.3%. The derotation degrees in brace was significantly correlated with major curve Cobb angle (r = 0.240, p = 0.030), minor curve Cobb angle (r = 0.256, p = 0.020) and total curve Cobb angle (r = 0.266, p = 0.016). Both the pre-brace apical vertebral rotation and apical vertebral level were significantly correlated with derotation effects in brace (p < 0.001). Patients with thoracic major curve showed worse derotation effects than those with lumbar major curve (p < 0.001). In addition, patients with coronal balance showed better in-brace derotation effects than those with coronal decompensation (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

A satisfactory apical vertebral derotation rate (approximately 50%) could be obtained immediately after bracing in AIS patients. Pre-brace Cobb angle of curve, pre-brace apical vertebral rotation, apical vertebral level and coronal balance exhibited close associations with in-brace derotation effects of apical vertebra.

Risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in a multicenter study of Lenke type 5 and 6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients

PURPOSE

In Lenke type 5 and 6 curves, a major thoracolumbar or lumbar curve, the rates of PJK are reported as high as 50%. The purpose of this study was to confirm the rate of PJK, investigate possible risk factors, and evaluate surgical complications and the long-term effects of PJK on patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of multicenter data identified 192 with patients with 2 year and 94 with 5-year follow-up. Included patients had a Lenke type 5 or 6 curve and underwent a selective thoracolumbar or lumbar curve fusion. All radiographs preoperatively and postoperatively (1 year, 2 years, and 5 years) were evaluated. Demographic and radiographic data was analyzed as risk factors for PJK using a multi-variate regression. Outcomes scores and complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

17 patients (8.9%) developed radiographic PJK; 1 at 1 year, 7 at 2 years, and another 9 at 5 years. All 17 patients had an upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) within 3 levels or less caudal of the thoracic kyphosis apex (the most horizontal vertebra on the sagittal); no patient with a UIV 4 or more levels from the thoracic apex (n = 96) developed PJK (X2 = 13.03, p < 0.001). In addition, PJA > 8° was found to significantly increase the risk of PJK (p = 0.039). SRS scores were significantly worse for PJK patients at 5 years in the self-image and function (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In Lenke 5/6 curves, no patient with a UIV 4 or more levels caudal to the thoracic kyphosis apex had PJK up to 5 years postoperatively. PJA greater than 8° was identified as a risk factor for PJK. Patients with radiographic PJK had worse SRS scores 5 years postoperatively.

Lowest Instrumented Vertebra at L3 Versus L4 in Posterior Fusion for Moderate Lenke 5C Type Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Case-Match Radiological Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the radiological outcomes in Lenke 5C type patients whose lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) was L3 or L4 in a case-match study.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-match study and included 82 patients in the study. Radiological results before surgery, after surgery, and at last follow-up were recorded and analyzed in the L3 and L4 groups.

RESULTS

After matching the age, Risser's sign, sex, and main Cobb, 41 pairs of patients were enrolled in our study. The total fusion segments in the L3 group (median [interquartile range]: 5.0 [6.0-5.0]) were shorter than those in the L4 group (6.0 [6.5-6.0]). The main curve was significantly corrected after surgery in both groups, and was comparable at the last followup between groups. In addition, according to the results of Fisher precision probability test, there was no significant difference of coronal or sagittal imbalance between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The correction in coronal and sagittal planes in L3 group and L4 group remains similar. On account of more motion segments, L3 could be an ideal choice as LIV in moderate Lenke 5C type AIS. Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the effect of larger compensatory lumbar-sacral curve when stopping at L3.

Relationship between lumbosacral transitional vertebra and postoperative outcomes of patients with Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 5-year follow-up study

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and evaluate the relationship between postoperative outcomes and LSTV when the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) is fixed at L3.

METHODS

The study included 61 patients with Lenke 5C AIS who underwent fusion surgery of L3 as the LIV who were followed-up for a minimum of 5 years. Patients were divided into two groups: LSTV + and LSTV-. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic data, including L4 tilt and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) Cobb angle, were obtained and analyzed.

RESULTS

LSTV was observed in 15 patients (24.5%). The L4 tilt was not significantly different between the two groups preoperatively (P = 0.54); however, it was significantly greater in the LSTV group postoperatively (2 weeks: LSTV +  = 11.7 ± 3.1, LSTV -  = 8.8 ± 3.2, P = 0.013; 2 years: LSTV +  = 11.5 ± 3.5, LSTV -  = 7.9 ± 4.1, P = 0.006; 5 years: LSTV +  = 9.8 ± 3.1, LSTV -  = 7.3 ± 4.5,  P= 0.042). The postoperative TL/L curve was greater in the LSTV + group, with significant differences at 2 weeks and 2 years postoperatively (preoperative: LSTV +  = 53.5 ± 11.2, LSTV -  = 51.7 ± 10.3,P = 0.675; 2 weeks: LSTV +  = 16.1 ± 5.0, LSTV- = 12.2 ± 6.6, P = 0.027; 2 years: LSTV +  = 21.7 ± 5.9, LSTV -  = 17.6 ± 5.9, P = 0.035; 5 years: LSTV +  = 18.7 ± 5.8, LSTV -  = 17.0 ± 6.1, P = 0.205).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of LSTV in Lenke 5C AIS patients was 24.5%. Lenke 5C AIS patients with LSTV with the LIV at L3 had a significantly greater postoperative L4 tilt than those without LSTV and retained the TL/L curve.

Optimization of in-brace corrective force in adolescents with Lenke type 5 curve using finite element model

BACKGROUND

Pelvic parameters have been taken into consideration for the evaluation of the outcomes of bracing in AIS. To discuss the stress required to correct the pelvic deformity related to Lenke5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) by finite element analysis, and provide a reference for the shaping of the pelvic region of the brace.

METHODS

An three-dimensional (3D) corrective force on the pelvic area was defined. Computed tomography images were used to reconstruct a 3D model of Lenke5 AIS. Computer-aided engineering software Abaqus was used to implement finite element analysis. By adjusting the magnitude and position of corrective forces, coronal pelvic coronal plane rotation (PCPR) and Cobb angle (CA) of lumbar curve in the coronal plane, horizontal pelvic axial plane rotation, and apical vertebra rotation (AVR) were minimized to achieve the best effect on the spine and pelvic deformity correction. The proposed corrective conditions were divided into three groups: (1) forces applied on X-axis; (2) forces applied both in the X- and Y-axis; and (3) forces applied along the X-, Y-, and Z-axis at the same time.

RESULTS

In three groups, CA correction reduced by 31.5%, 42.5%, and 59.8%, and the PCPR changed to 12°, 13°, and 1° from 6.5°, respectively. The best groups of correction forces should simultaneously locate on the sagittal, transverse, and coronal planes of the pelvis.

CONCLUSIONS

For Lenke5 AIS, 3D correction forces can sufficiently reduce scoliosis and pelvic asymmetrical state. Force applied along the Z-axis is vital to correct the pelvic coronal pelvic tilt associated with Lenke5 AIS.

How to select the lowest instrumented vertebra in NF-1 non-dystrophic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To investigate lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection strategy for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) non-dystrophic scoliosis.

METHODS

Consecutive eligible subjects with NF-1 non-dystrophic scoliosis were included. All patients were followed up at least for 24 months. Enrolled patients with LIV in stable vertebra were divided into stable vertebra group (SV group), and the other patients with LIV above the stable vertebra were divided into above stable vertebra group (ASV group). Demographic data, operative data, preoperative and postoperative radiographic data, and clinical outcome were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 14 patients in SV group (ten males and four females, mean age 13.9 ± 4.1 years) and 14 patients in ASV group (nine males and five females, mean age 12.9 ± 3.5 years). The mean follow-up period was 31.7 ± 17.4 months for patients in SV group and 33.6 ± 17.4 months for patients in ASV group, respectively. No significant differences were found in demographic data between two groups. The coronal Cobb angle, C7-CSVL, AVT, LIVDA, LIV tilt and SRS-22 questionnaire outcome significantly improved at the final follow-up in both groups. However, significantly higher loss of correction rate and increasement of LIVDA were found in ASV group. Two patients (14.3%) in ASV group but none in SV group suffered adding-on phenomenon.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients in both SV and ASV groups obtained improved therapeutic efficacy at final follow-up, the radiographic and clinical outcome seemed more likely to deteriorate in ASV group after surgery. The stable vertebra should be recommended as LIV for NF-1 non-dystrophic scoliosis.