Simplified S1 vertebral bone quality (vbq) score to assess proximal junctional kyphosis after Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery

BACKGROUND

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a common complication following corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with a Lenke 5 curve. Previous studies have suggested that PJK may be associated with osteopenia, which is prevalent in AIS patients. MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scores have been proposed as a valuable tool to assess preoperative bone quality. However, accurately measuring VBQ scores in Lenke 5 AIS patients with a structural lumbar curve can be challenging. Recently, a simplified S1 VBQ score has been proposed as an alternative method when the traditional VBQ score is not applicable. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of the simplified S1 VBQ score in predicting the occurrence of PJK after corrective surgery for Lenke 5 AIS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient data to assess the predictive utility of the S1 VBQ score for PJK in Lenke 5 AIS patients. Demographic, radiographic, and surgical data were collected, and S1 VBQ scores were calculated based on preoperative T1-weighted MRI images. Univariate analysis, linear regression, and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify potential risk factors for PJK and to assess the correlation between other variables and the S1 VBQ score. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and area under the curve values were used to evaluate the predictive efficiency of the S1 VBQ score for PJK.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients (aged 15.50 ± 2.36 years) were included in the analysis, of whom 24 (22.9%) developed PJK. S1 VBQ scores were significantly higher in the PJK group compared to the non-PJK group (2.83 ± 0.44 vs. 2.48 ± 0.30, P < 0.001), and there was a significant positive correlation between the S1 VBQ score and proximal junctional angle (PJA) (r = 0.46, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the S1 VBQ scores and preoperative thoracic kyphosis (TK) were significant predictors of PJK.

CONCLUSION

This study provided evidence that higher S1 VBQ scores were independently associated with PJK occurrence following corrective surgery for Lenke 5 AIS. Preoperative measurement of the S1 VBQ score on MRI may serve as a valuable tool in planning surgical correction for Lenke 5 AIS.

Ten-year follow-up of Lenke 5 curves treated with spinal fusion

INTRODUCTION

Patients with surgically treated Lenke 5 curves require at least partial fusion of the lumbar spine. The implications of lumbar fusion remain unknown as long-term follow-up is sparse.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected registry of patients with Lenke 5 curves treated with spinal fusion was performed. Clinical and radiographic outcomes as well as SRS-22 scores were collected at 2- and 10-year follow-up.

RESULTS

54 of 247 available patients met all inclusion criteria [26 treated with posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and 28 with anterior spinal fusion (ASF)]. Preoperative lumbar curve magnitude was 45.1 ± 8.4° and corrected to 14.0 ± 7.2° (p < 0.001). A 3.3 ± 7.3° increase in curve size was noted at final follow-up (p < 0.008) with 20.3% of patients having a loss of correction (LOC)of 10° or more. Thoracic curve correction and kyphosis were stable at 10-year follow-up. End vertebrae angulation improved from 11.2 ± 23.2° to 0.96 ± 6.4° (p = 0.004) and translation improved from 2.5 ± 2.9 to 0.92 ± 1.5 cm (p = 0.008) with no LOC. Disc wedging below the lower instrumented vertebrae increased from 0.3 ± 4.9° to 2.8 ± 4.4° (p < 0.001) with no change at 10 years. SRS-22 self-image and satisfaction improved from post-operative to final follow-up. No patient required a second operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ASF and PSF showed durable results at 10-year follow-up with no obvious difference between approaches. 20% of patients had a LOC > 10°; this did not correlate with pain or need for revision surgery. Disc wedging was stable. Selection of LIV did not correlate with pain scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Anterior versus posterior spinal fusion for Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

PURPOSE

To review and compare clinical and radiologic outcomes between anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for the treatment of Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to Preferred reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. All level I-III evidence studies investigating the clinical and radiologic outcomes of ASF and PSF for the treatment of Lenke type 5 AIS were included.

RESULTS

Nine studies (285 ASF patients, 298 PSF patients) were included. ASF was associated with a significantly lower number of levels fused compared with PSF (p < 0.01) with similar immediate and long-term coronal deformity correction (p = 0.16; p = 0.12, respectively). PSF achieved a better correction of thoracic hypokyphosis in one study and lumbar hypolordosis in three studies. PSF was associated with a significant shorter length of stay (LOS) compared with ASF (p < 0.01). One long-term study demonstrated a significantly higher rate of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) with PSF compared with ASF. There were no significant differences in major complication or re-operation rates.

CONCLUSION

For the treatment of Lenke type 5 AIS, there is moderate evidence to suggest that ASF requires a lower number of instrumented levels to achieve similar immediate and long-term coronal deformity correction compared with PSF. There is some evidence to suggest that PSF may achieve better thoracic and lumbar sagittal deformity correction compared with ASF. There is some evidence to suggest a higher incidence of PJK at long-term follow-up with PSF compared with ASF. ASF is associated with a longer post-operative LOS compared with PSF.

How to select the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) determination in Lenke type 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) requires a thorough understanding and prediction of the correction force on the LIV from coronal, sagittal, and axial plane. Although many LIV selection criteria have been reported, none of them comprehensively evaluated the multidimensional characteristics of the LIV till now.

PURPOSE

To develop and evaluate our LIV selection criteria in Lenke type 5 AIS patients using pedicle screw system via posterior approach.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All consecutive patients with Lenke 5 curves who were treated with one-stage selective lumbar fusion using complete pedicle screw system in our center from January 2006 to December 2017, with minimum 2-year follow-up.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Age, gender and Risser grade, fused levels, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaires outcome were recorded. Coronal, sagittal, and axial parameters were measured from plain radiographs.

METHODS

A total of 138 consecutive patients with Lenke 5 curves treated with selective lumbar fusion were retrospectively analyzed, with minimum 2-year follow-up. Our LIV selection criteria include: (1) the most cephalad vertebrae touched by central sacrum vertical line (CSVL); (2) Nash-Moe rotation being equal or less than grade I on the standing AP radiograph; (3) CSVL cross between the two pedicles of LIV on concave bending film; (4) not at the apex of kyphosis. Radiographic data, operative data, perioperative complications and SRS-22 outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 50.9±24.7 months. The thoracolumbar/lumbar curve was corrected from 46.9°±8.9° before surgery to 5.5°±2.6° at the final follow-up. The C7-CSVL was 19.7±6.2 mm before surgery and 5.2±3.4 mm at the final follow-up. The LIV translation was corrected from 22.3 ±5.4 mm before surgery to 4.8 ± 2.6 mm at the final follow-up, with the correction rate of 78.4%. The LIV tilt was corrected from 21.6 ± 4.4° before surgery to 2.6 ± 2.3° at the final follow up, with the correction rate of 87.9%. Our LIV saved 0.3 level than SRS-last barely touching vertebra, 0.6 level than SRS-last substantially touching vertebra, 0.9 level than neutral vertebra, and 1.4 level than stable vertebra.

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates using our LIV criteria, our study achieved the correction rate of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve as 88.9%, with the rate of adding on or coronal imbalance as 8.7% (12/138). The criteria may provide important guidance for preoperative decision-making in Lenke 5 AIS patients, and more multicenter prospective studies with larger samples are needed to further validate the findings of this study.

Flexibility assessment of the unfused thoracic segments above the "potential upper instrumented vertebrae" using the supine side bending radiographs in Lenke 5 and 6 curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Selection of upper instrumented vertebra for Lenke 5 and 6 curves remains debatable, and several authors have described different selection strategies.

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzed the flexibility of the unfused thoracic segments above the "potential upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV)" (T1-T12) and its compensatory ability in Lenke 5 and 6 curves using supine side bending (SSB) radiographs.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was used.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This study comprised 100 patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The ability of the unfused thoracic segments above the potential UIV, that is, T1-T12, to compensate in Lenke 5 and 6 curves was determined. We also analyzed postoperative radiological outcome of this cohort of patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

METHODS

Right and left SSB were obtained. Right side bending (RSB) and left side bending (LSB) angles were measured from T1 to T12. Compensatory ability of thoracic segments was defined as the ability to return to neutral (center sacral vertical line [CSVL]) with the assumption of maximal correction of lumbar curve with a horizontal UIV. The Lenke 5 curves were classified as follows: (1) Lenke 5-ve (mobile): main thoracic Cobb angle <15° and (2) Lenke 5+ve (stiff): main thoracic Cobb angle 15.0°-24.9°. This study was self-funded with no conflict of interest.

RESULTS

There were 43 Lenke 5-ve, 31 Lenke 5+ve, and 26 Lenke 6 curves analyzed. For Lenke 5-ve, >70% of thoracic segments were able to compensate when UIV were at T1-T8 and T12 and >50% at T9-T11. For Lenke 5+ve, >70% at T1-T6 and T12, 61.3% at T7, 38.7% at T8, 3.2% at T9, 6.5% at T10, and 22.6% at T11 were able to compensate. For Lenke 6 curve, >70% at T1-T6, 69.2% at T7, 19.2% at T8, 7.7% at T9, 0% at T10, 3.8% at T11, and 34.6% at T12 were able to compensate. There was a significant difference between Lenke 5-ve versus Lenke 5+ve and Lenke 5-ve versus Lenke 6 from T8 to T11. There were no significance differences between Lenke 5+ve and Lenke 6 curves from T1 to T11.

CONCLUSIONS

The compensatory ability of the unfused thoracic segment of Lenke 5+ve curves was different from the Lenke 5-ve curves, and it demonstrated characteristics similar to the Lenke 6 curves.

Analysing the change of sagittal balance in patients with Lenke 5 idiopathic scoliosis

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic parameters and the influence of lowest instrumented vertebrae on sagittal parameters in Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients.

Methods

A total of 42 patients (37 females, 5 males; mean age: 16.71 ± 3.46 years) were included in the study. Preoperative and postoperative last follow up lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral slope (SS) angles measured. By stopped fusion in L3, L4 or L5 we divided the group into three parts.

Results

Mean follow-up was 43 months. Preoperatively, the mean TK and LL were 36.8° and 55.3°. At the last follow up, the mean TK and LL were 27.1° and 49.0° degrees, respectively. Preoperatively, the mean PI, PT and SS were 53.3°, 16.1° and 37.4° degrees. At the last follow up, the mean PI, PT and SS were 52.7°, 19.9° and 33.0° respectively. Significant differences were observed for SS (p = 0.003), TK (p = 0.004), LL (p = 0.012) and PT (p = 0.013) postoperatively for all patients. According the L3 and L4 groups there is significant difference in SS, LL (p = 0.013) and PT (p = 0.018) which means a significant decrease occurs in SS and LL when the distal fusion level changes from L3 to L4 but significant increase in PT in L3 group to compensate spinopelvic change after surgery.

Conclusion

The selection of more distal level for fusion adversely affects the compensation mechanisms of sagittal balance in Lenke 5 AIS patients.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, Therapeutic study.

Selective versus hyperselective posterior fusions in Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

Recent literature has reported that the ]progression risk of Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) during adulthood had been underestimated. Surgery is, therefore, proposed more to young patients with progressive curves. However, choice of the approach and fusion levels remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of the length of posterior fusion on clinical and radiological outcomes in Lenke 5 AIS.

METHODS

All Lenke 5 AIS operated between 2008 and 2012 were included with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups according to the length of fusion. In the first group (selective), the upper instrumented level (UIV) was the upper end vertebra of the main structural curve and distally the fusion was extended to the stable and neutral vertebra, according to Lenke's classification. In the second group (hyperselective), shorter fusions were performed and the number of levels fused depended on the location of the apex of the curve (at maximum, 2 levels above and below, according to Hall's criteria). Apart from the fusion level selection, the surgical procedure was similar in both groups. Radiological outcomes and SRS-22 scores were reported.

RESULTS

78 patients were included (35 selective and 43 hyperselective). The number of levels fused was significantly higher in the first group (7.8 ± 3 vs 4.3 ± 0.6). None of the patients was fused to L4 in selective group. No correlation was found between length of fusion and complication rate. Eight patients had adding-on phenomenon among which 6 (75%) had initially undergone hyperselective fusions and had significantly higher postoperative lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) tilt. In the adding-on group, LIV was located above the last touching vertebra (LTV) in 62.5% of the cases and above the stable vertebra (SV) in 87.5%. Patients in the selective group reported a significantly lower score in the SRS function domain.

CONCLUSION

Coronal alignment was restored in both groups. Hyperselective posterior fusions can be considered in Lenke 5 AIS, preserving one or two mobile segments, with similar clinical and radiological outcomes. However, selection of the LIV according to SV and LTV need to be accurately analyzed in order to avoid adding-on during follow-up.