Posterior percutaneous plating of the humerus

Is an anteromedial minimally invasive approach for middle and distal third humeral fractures feasible? A cadaveric study and clinical case series

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic injury to the radial nerve is a risk in surgical treatment for extraarticular fractures of the middle and distal third of the humerus. We aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility and advantages of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) via an anteromedial approach in the treatment of middle and middle-distal humeral fractures and to evaluate proximity to neurovascular structures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2016, 13 adult cadaver arms were used to simulate a minimally invasive surgical approach to the anteromedial humerus followed by fixation with a locking compression plate (LCP), and several sets of anatomical data were measured to clarify the possible risk of iatrogenic vascular and nerve injury in this surgical approach. Then, a case series study of 12 patients with humeral fractures who were treated with this surgical approach was conducted between 2017 and 2020.

RESULTS

The average humeral length was 29.22 ± 1.62 cm, the average width of the medial epicondyle of the humerus was 1.31 ± 0.17 cm, and the average distance from the vertex of the medial epicondyle to the median nerve was 2.96 ± 1.62 cm. Furthermore, the safe area for distal humeral screw placement was 6.28 ± 0.39 cm, and the average distance from the tip of the distal end of the screw in the medial epicondyle to the ulnar nerve was 1.7 ± 1.25 mm. None of the 12 patients had nerve damage or an incisional infection after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

The new approach was performed as described, and no cases of iatrogenic nerve palsy occurred. This approach can be used as an alternative for the treatment of extraarticular fractures of the middle and distal thirds of the humerus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

[Translated article] The use of an anatomical implant compared to a straight LCP decreases extraction in posterior humeral MIPO

PURPOSE

Posterior MIPO approach in the humerus has been described by using a 4.5mm LCP plate. Although straight plates have shown good results, they have not been designed to adapt to the distal humeral metaphysis. The goal of the study was to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in hardware removal after posterior MIPO with either a straight or a pre-contoured plate.

METHODS

Patients older than 18 years, who had suffered mid-distal humeral shaft fracture, were treated by a posterior MIPO technique with a locking plate and had a minimum of 12-month follow-up were retrospectively included. Patients were separated into: group 1 (LCP 4.5mm straight plate); and group 2 (3.5mm anatomically shaped plate). Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed in the postoperative period. Patient-reported outcomes and the need of hardware removal because of pain were assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven patients in group 1 and 40 in group 2. No patient was lost to follow-up. There were no statistical differences between in patient reported outcomes measures. All the fractures healed. Within group 1, 18% (95%CI: 6-38%) of the patients required implant removal while in group 2 this incidence was 0% (95%CI: 0-9%) (P 0.009).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the use of a 4.5mm LCP compared to an anatomical 3.5mm LCP in posterior MIPO of the humerus generates greater discomfort and therefore leads to a 18% increase in the risk of implant removal.

The use of an anatomical implant compared to a straight LCP decreases extraction in posterior humeral MIPO

PURPOSE

Posterior MIPO approach in the humerus has been described by using a 4.5mm LCP plate. Although straight plates have shown good results, they have not been designed to adapt to the distal humeral metaphysis. The goal of the study was to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in hardware removal after posterior MIPO with either a straight or a pre-contoured plate.

METHODS

Patients older than 18 years, who had suffered mid-distal humeral shaft fracture, were treated by a posterior MIPO technique with a locking plate and had a minimum of 12-month follow-up were retrospectively included. Patients were separated into: group 1 (LCP 4.5mm straight plate); and group 2 (3.5mm anatomically shaped plate). Clinical and radiological evaluation were performed in the postoperative period. Patient-reported outcomes and the need of hardware removal because of pain were assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven patients in group 1 and 40 in group 2. No patient was lost to follow-up. There were no statistical differences between in patient reported outcomes measures. All the fractures healed. Within group 1, 18% (95%CI: 6-38%) of the patients required implant removal while in group 2 this incidence was 0% (95%CI: 0-9%) (P 0.009).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the use of a 4.5mm LCP compared to an anatomical 3.5mm LCP in posterior MIPO of the humerus generates greater discomfort and therefore leads to a 18% increase in the risk of implant removal.

Humeral shaft fracture: systematic review of non-operative and operative treatment

INTRODUCTION

Humeral shaft fractures can be treated non-operatively or operatively. The optimal management is subject to debate. The aim was to compare non-operative and operative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture in terms of fracture healing, complications, and functional outcome.

METHODS

Databases of Embase, Medline ALL, Web-of-Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were systematically searched for publications reporting clinical and functional outcomes of humeral shaft fractures after non-operative treatment with a functional brace or operative treatment by intramedullary nailing (IMN; antegrade or retrograde) or plate osteosynthesis (open plating or minimally invasive). A pooled analysis of the results was performed using MedCalc.

RESULTS

A total of 173 studies, describing 11,868 patients, were included. The fracture healing rate for the non-operative group was 89% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84-92%), 94% (95% CI 92-95%) for the IMN group and 96% (95% CI 95-97%) for the plating group. The rate of secondary radial nerve palsies was 1% in patients treated non-operatively, 3% in the IMN, and 6% in the plating group. Intraoperative complications and implant failures occurred more frequently in the IMN group than in the plating group. The DASH score was the lowest (7/100; 95% CI 1-13) in the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis group. The Constant-Murley and UCLA shoulder score were the highest [93/100 (95% CI 92-95) and 33/35 (95% CI 32-33), respectively] in the plating group.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that even though all treatment modalities result in satisfactory outcomes, operative treatment is associated with the most favorable results. Disregarding secondary radial nerve palsy, specifically plate osteosynthesis seems to result in the highest fracture healing rates, least complications, and best functional outcomes compared with the other treatment modalities.

Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) Through the Posterior Approach for the Humerus: A Cadaveric Study

Background Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been effectively used in femur and tibia fractures. MIPO in the humerus is conducted by anterior (most commonly used), lateral, and posterior approaches. However, in the anterior approach, in distal humeral diaphyseal fractures, there is a lack of adequate room for screw placement in the distal fragment for good stability. In such cases, the posterior approach for MIPO may be a propitious treatment method. However, the literature on MIPO using the posterior approach for humeral diaphyseal fractures is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of MIPO through the posterior approach and study the association of radial nerve injury with MIPO through the posterior approach for the humerus. Methodology This experimental study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India, and 20 cadaveric arms (10 right and 10 left) of 11 embalmed (formalin) cadavers were included (seven males and four females). Cadavers were placed prone on the dissection table. The posterolateral tip of the acromion and lateral epicondyle of the humerus were used as bony landmarks that were marked under C-Arm (Ziehm Imaging, Orlando, FL, USA) using K wires (Kirschner wires, Surgical Holdings, Essex, UK). Two incisions on the posterior part of the arm were made, and the radial nerve was identified at the proximal incision. After creating a submuscular tunnel, a 3.5 mm extraarticular distal humeral locking compression plate (LCP) was introduced over the posterior surface of the humerus and fixed to the humerus distally with one screw and then adjusted proximally and fixed to the humerus with another screw in the proximal window, followed by placement of couple more screws under C-Arm. After plate fixation, the dissection was completed to meticulously explore the radial nerve. The radial nerve was examined thoroughly for any injury sustained after completion of dissection, from the triangular interval to the lateral intermuscular septum where the nerve enters the anterior chamber. The position of the radial nerve with respect to plate holes was noted. The distance from the posterolateral tip of the acromion to the lateral epicondyle was measured as humeral length. The medial and lateral points where radial nerve passed over the posterior surface of the humerus were measured from the posterolateral tip of the acromion and compared with the humeral length. Results In this study, the radial nerve was lying over the posterior surface of the humerus for a mean distance of 52.161 ± 5.16 mm. The mean distance at which the radial nerve crossed the medial and lateral borders of the posterior surface of the humerus, measured from the posterolateral tip of the acromion, was 118.34 ± 10.86 mm (40.07% of humeral length) and 170 ± 12.30 mm (57.57% of humeral length), respectively, and the mean humeral length in this study was 295.27 ± 17.94 mm. The radial nerve and its branches were found to be intact in all cases. The radial nerve was related to the fifth, sixth, and seventh holes, with the nerve lying most commonly over the sixth hole (3.5 mm extraarticular distal humerus locking plate). Conclusions The posterior approach of MIPO in humeral fractures is a safe and reliable treatment modality with minimal risk of radial nerve injury. The radial nerve can be safely identified at the spiral groove using the bony landmarks described in our study.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis via posterior approach for type B and C fractures of distal humeral shaft: surgical tactics and a clinical series

The optimal technique and implant for fixation of multifragmentary fractures of the distal humeral shaft remain inconclusive. We describe the use of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) via posterior approach and extra-articular distal humerus locking compression plate (LCP-EADH) fixation for 18 such fractures. All fractures were united with a mean union time of 17.6 weeks (range 12-20). Transient radial nerve palsy was demonstrated in 2 patients. Six patients had 5° varus angulation and 1 had 5° valgus angulation. Triceps power was Grade 5 in all patients. The mean arc of elbow motion was 127.5 degrees (range 115-140). Six patients had an excellent MEP score and 12 had a good MEP score. As the results, posterior MIPO and LCP-EADH fixation could be an alternative for multifragmentary fractures of the distal humeral shaft, particularly for fractures with a very short distal fragment.

Treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a new minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction and internal fixation: a case control study

Background

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a new minimally-invasive surgical approach–anteromedial minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO)–in the treatment of middle and distal humeral shaft fractures.

Methods

Fourteen patients with humeral shaft fracture treated with anteromedial MIPO from November 2016 to March 2020 (MIPO Group) were selected as the study subjects. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were used to treat 14 patients with humeral shaft fractures as the control group (ORIF group). The two groups were fixed with a locking compression plate (LCP) or LCP + multi-directional locking screw system (MDLS). The incision length, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operation time, length of hospital stay, fracture healing time, QuickDASH score and Constant score were observed and compared between the two groups.

Results

Fourteen patients were enrolled in each group. The incision length (7.79 ± 2.39 cm), intraoperative blood loss (96.07 ± 14.96 mL), operative time (110.57 ± 21.90 min), hospital stay (6.29 ± 1.49 days) and fracture healing time (14.94 ± 0.99 weeks) in the MIPO group were all lower than those in the ORIF group, and the difference was statistically significant for each parameter (P < 0.05). The intraoperative fluoroscopy time (20.07 ± 3.22) in the MIPO group was significantly higher than that in the ORIF group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in age (P = 0.078), QuickDASH score (P = 0.074) or Constant score (P = 0.293) between the two groups and no postoperative complications occurred in any of the patients.

Conclusion

The anteromedial approach MIPO technique has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, low risk of nerve injury and high rate of fracture healing. It is one of the most effective methods for the treatment of middle and middle–distal humeral shaft fractures.

Biomechanical evaluation of a modified proximal humeral locking plate application for distal extra-articular diaphyseal humeral fractures

The extra-articular distal humerus locking plate (EADHP) is widely used for distal extra-articular diaphyseal humeral fracture fixation. However, it occasionally causes skin prominence and discomfort. The upside-down use of a proximal humerus internal locking system (PHILOS) plate is suggested as an alternative option, but it lacks biomechanical evidence. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance between two different fixation methods: the modified use of the PHILOS plate on the anterior cortex versus conventional use of an EADHP on the posterior cortex. Twelve pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric humeri were used and 7 mm gap osteotomy was performed at 50 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle to simulate an AO/OTA 12-C1.3 fracture type. Single load to failure was measured after five stiffness tests of the plate-bone constructs in anterior/posterior bending, internal/external torsion, and axial compression. There were no significant differences in metrics between the two groups, except for the load to failure in posterior bending, which was significantly higher for PHILOS (1589.3 ± 234.5) compared to EADHP (1430.1 ± 188.6), p < .023. In conclusion, the modified use of the PHILOS plate showed comparable biomechanical performance compared to the conventional EADHP. The new fixation method offers potential clinical advantages, considering the patient's position and surgical approach at the time of surgery as well as postoperative soft tissue irritation. Therefore, this could be an option for distal humeral extra-articular diaphyseal fracture fixation when the use of EADHP is not suitable or preferred.

Radial nerve palsy associated with closed humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review of 1758 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Humeral shaft fractures are often associated with radial nerve palsy (RNP) (8-16%). The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess the incidence of primary and secondary RNP in closed humeral shaft fractures. The secondary aim was to compare the recovery rate of primary RNP and the incidence of secondary RNP between operative and non-operative treatment.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in 'Trip Database', 'Embase' and 'PubMed' to identify original studies reporting on RNP in closed humeral shaft fractures. The Coleman Methodology Score was used to grade the quality of the studies. The incidence and recovery of RNP, fracture characteristics and treatment characteristics were extracted. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to compare operative versus non-operative treatment.

RESULTS

Forty studies reporting on 1758 patients with closed humeral shaft fractures were included. The incidence of primary RNP was 10%. There was no difference in the recovery rate of primary RNP when comparing operative treatment with radial nerve exploration (98%) versus non-operative treatment (91%) (p = 0.29). The incidence of secondary RNP after operative and non-operative treatment was 4% and 0.4%, respectively (p < 0.01).

INTERPRETATION

One-in-ten patients with a closed humeral shaft fracture has an associated primary RNP, of which > 90% recovers without the need of (re-)intervention. No beneficial effect of early exploration on the recovery of primary RNP could be demonstrated when comparing patients managed non-operatively with those explored early. Patients managed operatively for closed humeral shaft fractures have a higher risk of developing secondary RNP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Systematic Review.

Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Posterior Approach to Distal Humeral Shaft Fractures-A Surgical Technique

Comminuted extraarticular metaphyseal and diaphyseal fractures of the distal humerus frequently require operative fixation through a posterior approach. Most of the previously described approaches to the posterior humerus are dependent on large and extensile approaches. This video demonstrates open reduction and internal fixation of a comminuted metaphyseal distal humerus fracture through a minimally invasive posterior approach.

Anterior minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis using reversed proximal humeral internal locking system plate for distal humeral shaft fractures

OBJECTIVE

To describe the surgical application of anterior minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO) using reversed proximal humerus internal locking system (PHILOS) plate for multifragmentary distal humeral shaft fractures.

METHODS

Twelve patients with distal humeral shaft fractures (type 12B, n = 6 and type 12C, n = 6) were operated on by anterior MIPO and reversed PHILOS plate fixation. The amount of intact bone in the distal fragment was measured by fracture-to-coronoid distance (FCD). Data of the postoperative alignment, complications, union time, and clinical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

The mean time for fractures to unite in all patients was 14.8 weeks (range 12-22). There was no perioperative complication. The mean FCD was 4.8 cm (range 2.1-8.1). The mean coronal angulation was 3.4° (range 0-9), and the mean sagittal angulation was 1° (range 0-5). All patients had excellent UCLA shoulder score and MEP score results, and the mean range of elbow motion was 140° (range 130-145).

CONCLUSION

Anterior MIPO using reversed PHILOS plate is safe and effective for multifragmentary fractures of the distal humeral shaft even in a fracture with a length of intact bone above the coronoid fossa of only 2 cm.

New, Minimally Invasive, Anteromedial-Distal Approach for Plate Osteosynthesis of Distal-Third Humeral Shaft Fractures: An Anatomical Study

Background:

Fractures of the distal third of the humeral shaft remain a challenge today. Plate osteosynthesis is the most commonly used method of treatment. Current minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) techniques applied to the distal part of the humerus have shown a high risk of radial nerve injury, and they are unable to adequately fix distal-most fractures. Our hypothesis was that using a new MIPO approach, distal humeral shaft fractures can be safely fixed. The aim of this study was to develop this new anteromedial-distal MIPO approach.

Methods:

We conducted a laboratory descriptive study using 16 arms from adult human specimens. A new anteromedial-distal MIPO approach, starting distally through a small window in the pronator teres muscle, was developed. A premolded plate was introduced in the anterior side of the medial epicondylar area, through the anterior face of the humerus, up to the proximal part of the humeral shaft. Several anatomical parameters were measured on dissection to define the distances of the plate and screws to the neurovascular structures that could be at risk.

Results:

The radial nerve was not at risk because of its pathway through the posterior and lateral aspects of the arm. The mean distance from the most distal border of the medial epicondyle to the proximal border of the coronoid fossa was 3.36 cm (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.23 to 3.50 cm). At least 3 screws could be inserted in all specimens in this area and up to 5 when the fixation area was extended 2 cm proximally. The mean width of the medial epicondylar area was 2.19 cm (95% CI, 2.03 to 2.33 cm), space enough for the distal fixation of the plate. The ulnar nerve was at risk only from the tip of the most distal screw (mean distance of 2.50 mm; 95% CI, 1.60 to 3.40 mm) in specimens with a very narrow medial epicondylar area.

Conclusions:

This approach provides adequate fixation for distal humeral shaft fractures, but proper clinical studies must be undertaken.

Clinical Relevance:

This new approach avoids the risk of radial nerve injury.

Modified use of a proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate in extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal humeral fractures is controversial in terms of surgical approach and position of implant. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a modified application of the proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate in extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal humeral fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 23 patients with extra-articular distal humerus fractures were treated using either open plating or the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique with upside down application of the PHILOS plate. Fracture configuration, number of screws in the distal fragment, and time to union were analysed. Elbow range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and complications were evaluated at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Fracture union was obtained in all patients at a mean postoperative time of 20.8 ± 2.9 weeks. The mean shortest and longest cortical lengths were 50.7 ± 14.0 mm and 85.2 ± 12.4 mm, respectively. The average number of screws in the distal humeral fragment was 5.6 ± 0.7. No statistically significant correlation was observed between the shortest cortical length and number of screws in the distal fragment (p = 0.224) or between the longest cortical length and the number of screws in the distal humeral fragment (p = 0.956). The average MEPS was 97.6 (range, 75-100). No postoperative complications that required reoperation were occured.

CONCLUSION

A modified anterior application of the PHILOS plate in extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal humeral fracture showed satisfactory outcomes, so it is an alternative when considering the ability to increase plate-screw density with locking screw fixation in a distal humeral fragment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level IV, case series.

Anteromedial minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for distal third humeral shaft fractures - Is it possible?: A cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the anteromedial minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) approach for distal third humeral shaft fractures and identify neurovascular structures at risk with this approach.

METHODS

Twenty cadaveric arms were fixed with 12-hole precontoured narrow locking compression plates (LCP) with the anteromedial approach using MIPO technique. The proximal approach was done between the biceps and deltoid muscle directly to the bone. The distal approach involved elevating the brachialis from medial intermuscular septum. The plate was inserted beneath the brachialis tunnel from distal to proximal. Three locking screws were fixed at each end through incisions and the rest of screws were inserted percutaneously. The arms were then dissected to identify damage to or direct contact between the screws and brachial artery (BA), median nerve (MN), musculocutaneous nerve (MCN), and radial nerve (RN). The distances from the screws to structures at risk, humeral length, and length of three distal screws in mediolateral (ML) direction were measured.

RESULTS

The average humeral length was 28.97 cm. The average danger zone for the BA and MN were 20.47%-62.66% of the humeral length from the lateral epicondyle, and 20.47%-75.02% for the MCN. The ulnar nerve was not endangered by this approach as it lies posteromedially to the humerus. The danger zone for the RN averaged 27.07%-43.74%, and the most dangerous screw that either penetrated or touched the nerve was at the fifth hole, which lay at 33.14% of the humeral length. The average length of three distal screws in ML direction were 41.4, 25.0 and 22.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The anteromedial MIPO approach can be performed through the internervous plane beneath the brachialis muscle without exposing any nerves or causing any muscle splitting with a 12-hole plate. Both proximal and distal screw insertion must be done with direct exposure. Insertion of percutaneous screws in the middle part of the plate between the two incisions is not possible. This approach could be an alternative for extra-articular distal third humeral shaft fractures which provides less invasive surgical dissection, allows the use of longer distal screws, and achieves better cosmesis.

The safety and feasibility of minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the posterior aspect of the humerus: A cadaveric study

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of applying MIPO of the humerus via the posterior approach and to observe the tension of the radial nerve in different elbow positions. Two separate incisions were made on the posterior aspect of the humerus in ten fresh cadavers (20 humeri). The radial nerve was identified at the proximal incision and the distances through which the nerve could be elevated from the bone with the elbow in flexion and extension were measured. A 10-hole extra-articular distal humeral locking compression plate was inserted and fixed through the submuscular tunnel. The tunnel was then explored to identify any entrapment of the radial nerve and to observe the anatomical relationship of the radial nerve to the plate and bone. There was no entrapment of the radial nerve or its branches. The distances through which the radial nerve could be elevated were greater with the elbow in extension than in flexion (P < 0.01). The radial nerve crossed the medial and lateral borders of the posterior surface of the humerus at 80.1-132 mm (average 104.7 mm) and 116.6-175.5 mm (average 142.7 mm) of its total length, respectively. The axillary nerve was located at 38.7-61.7 mm (average 47.9 mm) of total humeral length. MIPO of the humerus using the posterior approach is an alternative option for treating distal humeral shaft fracture. The risk of radial nerve injury can be minimized by careful dissection in the proximal incision. Clin. Anat. 32:176-182, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Submuscular double bridge plating for complex distal fractures of the humerus: an alternative, safe, and efficient treatment method

PURPOSE

The aim of our study is to show the functional outcomes and complication rates of humeral complex fractures in adults, using osteosynthesis with two bridging orthogonal submuscular plates.

METHODS

The study consists of a prospective case series of 13 patients with isolated humeral complex fractures treated with two bridging orthogonal submuscular plates. Functional assessment was performed using disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score with 30 items. The age ranged from 22 to 68 years, with a mean age of 39 years. Functional assessment with DASH score was performed at the twelfth postoperative week.

RESULTS

All patients presented fracture healing in the fourth postoperative month. Of the 13 patients, five (38%) had a DASH score of zero (best function possible). One patient developed neuropraxis and presented with a score of 100 (worst possible). One case developed superficial infection, which was treated with oral antibiotics and local debridement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated satisfactory functional outcome in patients with distal-third diaphyseal humeral complex fractures treated with two locked submuscular plates. The authors consider it as a safe method and an efficient alternative, especially in younger patients who require early functional recovery.

Posterior minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of distal third humeral shaft fractures with segmental isolation of the radial nerve

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes of a cohort of patients with distal third humeral shaft fractures treated using a posterior minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique. Twenty-one patients were retrospectively evaluated, 13 men and 8 women with an average age of 37 years. The surgery was performed through two posterior incisions away from the fracture site. The radial nerve was identified and protected. The fracture was fixed with a narrow 4.5/5.0mm locking compression plate. After an average follow-up of 22 months, flexion-extension of the elbow was 138°±7°, with a range of motion of 131°. Shoulder motion was 160° in forward flexion, 59° in external rotation, and internal rotation was to the spinous process of 9th thoracic vertebra. Pain severity was 0.5 on the VAS. The DASH score was 9. Average Constant score was 84. MEPI was 97. Fracture union was obtained in all patients. One patient developed transient postoperative radial nerve palsy. These results demonstrate that the posterior MIPO technique is a reliable option for treating distal third humeral shaft fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.