Surgical repair of Salter-Harris type II fracture of the distal humerus: short and long-term outcomes in a case series of three dogs and one cat

CASE HISTORIES

Three dogs and one cat sustained forelimb trauma and were presented to a university veterinary clinic (Liège, Belgium) and a private veterinary hospital (Beacouzé, France). All four animals were referred for surgery.

CLINICAL FINDINGS

Two dogs and the cat were ambulatory on admission but unable to bear weight on the affected limb. One dog was non-ambulatory and lacked voluntary movement and sensation in one forelimb. Salter-Harris type II fractures of the distal humerus were diagnosed by radiography in all cases; avulsion of the brachial plexus and pelvic fractures were also present in the non-ambulatory dog.

TREATMENT AND OUTCOME

All Salter-Harris type II fractures were stabilised by open reduction and internal fixation with cross pins. One minor complication (seroma) and three major complications (implant migration) developed after surgery. The pins were completely removed in one case and partially removed in two cases to resolve these complications. At the final follow-up examination (12-31 months after surgery), owners reported no lameness in three of the four cases and grade 2/5 left forelimb lameness in one case.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This type of fracture is rarely described in the literature; however, it should be included in the differential diagnoses of traumatic humeral fractures in growing dogs and cats. In this case series, we achieved fair-to-excellent short-term and long-term outcomes after osteosynthesis of Salter-Harris type II fractures by cross pinning.

Olecranon Osteotomy by a Gigli Saw versus Chevron's Osteotomy for Exposure of Intra-articular Distal Humerus: A Comparative Study

Introduction

Olecranon osteotomy is employed for the fixation of intraarticular distal humeral fractures. We conducted a prospective, randomised study comparing Chevron's osteotomy with olecranon osteotomy by a Gigli saw for exposure of the intraarticular distal humerus in terms of functional outcome and intra-operative ease of the surgery.

Materials and methods

Thirty patients with skeletally mature AO/OTA type 13- B and 13-C distal humerus fractures were randomly allocated to Chevron's or Gigli saw groups. Each group consisted of a total of 15 patients. Both the groups were assessed on post-operative parameters including arm, shoulder or hand pain, ability to perform certain routine activities, tingling sensations and pain while sleeping.

Results

In the Gigli saw group, 12 patients had no gross limitation of activity and 13 were able to perform moderate activities with ease. Similar results were observed in the Chevron's group. The mean difference between the two groups in Oxford Score was 0.60, within the 95% confidence interval and in line with QuickDASH-11 Score.

Conclusion

Chevron's technique offers stability and better healing, providing a larger surface area for bone union. However, it is challenging and time-consuming. Also, literature suggests that the Gigli saw has multiple benefits, saves time and effort, and heals by switching blood supply from centrifugal to centripetal post-operatively. Our study suggests that both Chevron's technique and the use of the Gigli saw are effective in distal humeral intra-articular fractures as assessed by multiple parameters. Hence both techniques can be equally used depending on the surgeon's preference.

Outcomes and complications after open reduction and internal fixation of distal humeral fractures with precontoured locking plates

Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate functional and radiographic results after open reduction and internal fixation of distal humeral fractures using precontoured locking plates. Our main hypothesis was that patients older than 65 years have inferior outcomes compared with younger patients.

Methods

All patients treated for a distal humeral fracture with precontoured locking plates between 2006 and 2017 at a level 1 trauma center were identified. Included patients underwent a clinical examination, and new radiographs were obtained. Functional outcomes were evaluated using Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, visual analog scale elbow satisfaction, and range of motion. Complications and reoperations were recorded.

Results

Fifty-seven patients with a median age of 60 years were included in this study. Median Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand was 14, and median Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 85. There was no difference in functional scores in patients younger than 65 years or 65 years or older. However, the median flexion-extension arc was 121 degrees in patients younger than 65 years and 111 degrees in patients 65 years or older (P = 0.01). The overall complication rate was 68%, and 24 patients had at least 1 reoperation. Ulnar neuropathy was the most common complication followed by reduced range of motion.

Conclusions

Operative management of distal humeral fractures with precontoured locking plates provides good functional outcome. The patient-reported outcomes were good, independent of patient age. The implant failure rate is low with precontoured locking plates; however, the complication rate remains high, and reoperations are common.

Level of Evidence

Level 4, retrospective study.

Elbow arthroplasty is safe for the management of simple open distal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Elbow arthroplasty (EA) is an established technique for the treatment of select distal humeral fractures, yet little data exists regarding the safety and outcome of EA in the presence of an open distal humeral fracture where the risk of periprosthetic infection is an even greater concern. We hypothesized that EA does not carry an increased risk of infection or other postoperative complications when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures.

METHODS

Seventeen patients underwent total EA (n = 9) or hemiarthroplasty (n = 8) for an open distal humeral fracture. The open fracture component was classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Society system as "simple" or "complex." Outcome measures collected included the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion, complications, and reoperations. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation were compared with those who underwent preliminary débridement procedures and subsequent staged arthroplasty. A systematic review of the existing literature was performed to analyze other reported cases and contextualize our findings.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 46 months (range, 12-138 months). All fractures were multifragmentary and intra-articular. Sixteen patients had a "simple" open fracture and 1 had a "complex" fracture. The overall mean MEPS was 83 (range, 30-100; standard deviation ± 17), with a mean flexion-extension arc of 96°. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation demonstrated a higher mean flexion arc (116° vs. 79°, P = .02) than those who underwent staged arthroplasty. The mean MEPS was not significantly different between the groups (90 vs. 78, P = .12). Complications included asymptomatic ulna component loosening (n = 1), joint instability (n = 1), and symptomatic heterotopic ossification (n = 3). There were no deep or superficial infections recorded.

CONCLUSION

EA is safe and effective when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures. Primary débridement and implantation may offer functional benefits over a staged approach.

Biomechanical evaluation of a modified proximal humeral locking plate application for distal extra-articular diaphyseal humeral fractures

The extra-articular distal humerus locking plate (EADHP) is widely used for distal extra-articular diaphyseal humeral fracture fixation. However, it occasionally causes skin prominence and discomfort. The upside-down use of a proximal humerus internal locking system (PHILOS) plate is suggested as an alternative option, but it lacks biomechanical evidence. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance between two different fixation methods: the modified use of the PHILOS plate on the anterior cortex versus conventional use of an EADHP on the posterior cortex. Twelve pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric humeri were used and 7 mm gap osteotomy was performed at 50 mm proximal to the lateral epicondyle to simulate an AO/OTA 12-C1.3 fracture type. Single load to failure was measured after five stiffness tests of the plate-bone constructs in anterior/posterior bending, internal/external torsion, and axial compression. There were no significant differences in metrics between the two groups, except for the load to failure in posterior bending, which was significantly higher for PHILOS (1589.3 ± 234.5) compared to EADHP (1430.1 ± 188.6), p < .023. In conclusion, the modified use of the PHILOS plate showed comparable biomechanical performance compared to the conventional EADHP. The new fixation method offers potential clinical advantages, considering the patient's position and surgical approach at the time of surgery as well as postoperative soft tissue irritation. Therefore, this could be an option for distal humeral extra-articular diaphyseal fracture fixation when the use of EADHP is not suitable or preferred.

Long-term outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty for distal humeral fracture: results from a prior randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is a reliable treatment for elderly patients with comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures. However, the longevity and long-term complications associated with this procedure are unknown. The objectives of this study were to examine long-term outcomes and implant survival in elderly patients undergoing TEA for fracture.

METHODS

Patients from a previously published randomized controlled trial of 42 patients in which TEA was compared with open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) were followed up long term. Patients were aged 65 years or older with comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures. Outcomes included patient-reported grading of function and pain, revision surgical procedures, and implant survival.

RESULTS

Data were obtained for 40 patients, 15 treated with ORIF and 25 treated with TEA, with a mean follow-up period of 12.5 years for surviving patients and 7.7 years for deceased patients. The reoperation rate was 3 of 25 in the TEA group and 4 of 15 in the ORIF group (P = .39). Of the 25 patients with TEAs, only 1 required (early) revision arthroplasty; 7 were living with their original arthroplasty, and 15 died with a well-functioning implant in situ. Three were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

TEA is an effective and reliable procedure for the treatment of comminuted distal humeral fractures in the elderly patient. Our study reveals reliable implant long-term survival, with no patient requiring a late revision. For the majority of these patients, a well-performed TEA will give them a well-functioning elbow for life and will be the last elbow procedure required.

Increased incidence of distal humeral fracture surgery and decreased incidence of respective corrective osteotomy among Finns aged 0 to 18 years between 1987 and 2016: a population-based study

PURPOSE

Previous studies on paediatric and adolescent distal humeral fractures have reported an increase in surgical treatment activity. This increase could be hypothesized to reduce the incidence of corrective osteotomies. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and trends of the primary surgical treatment of distal humeral fractures and corrective osteotomies in children and adolescents.

METHODS

All Finns 18 years of age or younger who underwent treatment for distal humeral fracture between 1987 and 2016 were included in this population-based study. Surgical treatment data were obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Register of Finland. In calculating annual surgery incidence rates, the annual mid-year populations were obtained from the Official Statistics Finland. Surgical treatment was categorized into four groups; reposition and casting, osteosynthesis, external fixation and corrective osteotomy.

RESULTS

During the 30-year study period, 9017 surgical procedures were performed in Finland with the primary or secondary diagnosis code being a distal humeral fracture. Of these, 6961 (77.2%) were osteosynthesis and the incidence of osteosynthesis (per 100 000 person-years) increased fourfold from 8.2 in 1987 to 34.1 in 2016. In the same 30-year study period, the total number of corrective osteotomies was low (151) with annual variation from one to 16. The incidence of corrective osteotomies (per 100 000 person-years) decreased sevenfold from 0.7 to 0.1.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of surgical treatment with osteosynthesis in distal humeral fractures increased fourfold in Finland between 1987 and 2016. During the same time period, the number of corrective osteotomies diminished significantly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of total elbow arthroplasty versus open reduction-internal fixation for distal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) are 2 viable surgical treatment options for acute, intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Whereas recent systematic reviews and randomized trials have suggested that TEA and ORIF result in similar functional outcome scores, no previous study has assessed the comparative cost-effectiveness between TEA and distal humeral ORIF in this specific demographic.

METHODS

A Markov model was created with the highest-level data available from the literature depicting transitioning health states based on treatment strategies. To populate the quality-of-life data points in the model lacking in the literature, a survey was conducted of patients at 2 referral institutions who underwent TEA or ORIF for acute, intra-articular distal humeral fractures via the European Quality of Life, 5 Domains (EQ-5D) questionnaire at least 2 years postoperatively. Cost data from 2016 for each strategy were used to calculate the comparative cost-effectiveness of TEA versus ORIF.

RESULTS

For patients aged 65 years, the total cost of TEA was $19,407 compared with $20,669 for ORIF. The effectiveness of TEA and ORIF was 8.17 and 7.72, respectively. Overall, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of TEA ($2375.76/quality-adjusted life-year) was favored more than ORIF ($2677.26/quality-adjusted life-year).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest TEA is a slightly more cost-effective procedure than ORIF for most elderly patients who sustain acute, intra-articular distal humeral fractures. Still, the unique limitations, complications, and revision rates for each strategy must be carefully weighed for each patient when making a decision.

A new technique for olecranon osteotomy in the treatment of distal humeral fractures

Background

Olecranon osteotomy is a commonly used method for obtaining adequate exposure of the articular surface in complex distal humeral fractures. We describe a new technique whereby a precontoured olecranon plate is first fixed to the olecranon, and a Gigli saw is used to perform the osteotomy while the plate is in place.

Methods

By use of a standard posterior approach, a precontoured olecranon plate is applied to the olecranon and affixed with screws both proximally and distally to the planned osteotomy site. A Gigli saw is passed anterior to the olecranon and is used to create an osteotomy through the bare area of the sigmoid notch. The plate is removed from the distal fragment. The proximal olecranon fragment, plate, and extensor mechanism are retracted proximally en bloc to expose the articular surface. After fracture repair, the osteotomy fragments are reapproximated, and the plate is reattached to the distal fragment. QuickDASH (short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) scores for patients treated with this technique were compared with those of patients treated with the standard chevron osteotomy method.

Results

All patients achieved radiographic and clinical union of the osteotomy site. QuickDASH, VR-12 physical, and VR-12 mental scores were not significantly different from those of patients in the chevron osteotomy group (P = .93, P = .79, and P = .68, respectively; t test).

Conclusion

The described method provides excellent visualization of the joint, is less technically challenging than the standard chevron osteotomy, and reduces operative time. Osteotomy union was attained in all 5 cases, with functional outcomes comparable with those attained with the chevron technique.

Triceps-sparing extra-articular step-cut olecranon osteotomy for distal humeral fractures: an anatomic study

BACKGROUND

This anatomic study investigated the distal humeral articular surface exposure achievable through a triceps-sparing oblique extra-articular osteotomy of the olecranon with a step-cut modification compared with the anconeus flap transolecranon apex distal chevron osteotomy. In addition, the bone contact surface areas of the osteotomized surfaces after transolecranon and extra-articular osteotomies were compared.

METHODS

Seven pairs of fresh adult cadaveric elbow joints were examined. Each of the right elbows underwent triceps-sparing extra-articular step-cut olecranon osteotomy (SCOOT) with an anconeus flap, and the left elbows underwent the anconeus flap transolecranon apex distal chevron osteotomies (CO). The articular surface exposed by each of the osteotomy techniques was then digitally analyzed using a 3-dimensional measurement system. The bone contact surface area of the osteotomized surfaces was also assessed.

RESULTS

The percentage of total joint exposed by the SCOOT group was less than the CO group (SCOOT: 64% ± 3% vs. CO: 73% ± 3%; P = .002). There was significantly greater bone contact surface area of the osteotomized surfaces in the SCOOT group compared with the CO group (SCOOT: 1172 ± 251 mm² vs. CO: 457 ± 133 mm²; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

The triceps SCOOT procedure with an anconeus flap provides excellent distal humeral articular surface exposure with the added benefit of a substantially increased (2.6-times) bone contact surface area of the osteotomized surfaces.