Surgical treatment outcome after serial debridement of infected nonunion-A retrospective cohort study

Multidisciplinary Teams in Musculoskeletal Infection - From a Pathologist's Perspective

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings have emerged as a promising approach for the treatment of cancer patients. These meetings involve a team of healthcare professionals from different disciplines working together to develop a holistic, patient-centered treatment. Although MDT meetings are well established in oncology, they play a minor role in other diseases. Recent evidence suggests that the implementation of MDT meetings can improve patient outcomes in musculoskeletal infections. The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to present the agenda of our multidisciplinary limb board including live microscopy with a special focus on the pathologist's role. The descriptive analysis of the limb board included 66 cases receiving live microscopy at the meeting and a total of 124 histopathological findings and 181 stainings. We could elucidate that pathologists seem to play an important role especially in clarifying the correct diagnosis. In 80.3 % of the findings, the pathologist specified the clinical diagnosis of the requesting physician leading to a consensus-based treatment plan for each patient. The implementation of MDT meetings including live microscopy in patients with musculoskeletal infections holds potential benefits, such as improved communication, scientific collaboration, and raising clinicians' awareness and understanding of histopathology findings. However, potential challenges, such as organizational effort and technical prerequisites should be considered.

[Treatment strategies for fracture-related infections with concurrent soft tissue damage]

Fracture-related infections are the predominant complication following surgical fracture treatment. The distal lower leg, e.g., in pilon tibial fractures, is at a high risk of infection due to poor soft tissue coverage, particularly in cases of open fractures in this area. Fracture-related infections with significant soft tissue damage require special attention alongside treatment of the infection itself. In general, the principle is that healing of fracture-related infection is not possible without sufficient soft tissue coverage. Therefore, it is crucial to integrate both soft tissue damage and fracture-related infection into a comprehensive treatment plan from the beginning. An interdiscpilinary treatment approach between trauma and plastic surgery is often necessary and beneficial. In cases, where fracture fixation devices or bone is exposed, mid- or long-term use of vacuum-assisted wound therapy is not advisable due to a higher risk of reinfection. Hence, an interdisciplinary treatment strategy involving trauma and plastic surgery should prioritize early soft tissue closure, referred to as the "orthoplastic approach". If this cannot be done in the own hospital, early patient transfer is indicated to ensure optimal interdisciplinary therapy with early soft tissue closure and simultaneous trauma surgical treatment to control the infection and enable bone healing. Free fasciocutaneous or muscle flap techniques in combination with adequate trauma surgical and antibiotic therapy lead to good reliable results in these situations.

Fracture-Related Infection-Epidemiology, Etiology, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Fracture-related infection (FRI) is a challenge to physicians and other workers in health care. In 2018, there were 7253 listed cases of FRI in Germany, corresponding to an incidence of 10.7 cases per 100 000 persons per year.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved from a search in PubMed with the search terms "fracture," "infection," "guideline," and "consensus." Aside from the primary literature, international guidelines and consensus recommendations were evaluated as well.

RESULTS

FRI arise mainly from bacterial contamination of the fracture site. Staphylococcus aureus is the most commonly detected pathogen. The treatment is based on surgery and antibiotics and should be agreed upon by an interdisciplinary team; it is often difficult because of biofilm formation. Treatment options include implant-preserving procedures and single-stage, two-stage, or multi-stage implant replacement. Treatment failure occurs in 10.3% to 21.4% of cases. The available evidence on the efficacy of various treatment approaches is derived mainly from retrospective cohort studies (level III evidence). Therefore, periprosthetic joint infections and FRI are often discussed together.

CONCLUSION

FRI presents an increasing challenge. Preventive measures should be optimized, and the treatment should always be decided upon by an interdisciplinary team. Only low-level evidence is available to date to guide diagnostic and treatment decisions. High-quality studies are therefore needed to help us meet this challenge more effectively.

A modified induced membrane 2-stage technique using a thoracodorsal artery perforator free flap followed by vascularized or non-vascularized free fibular transfer for the treatment of complex bone infection with concomitant severe soft tissue lesion-A case series of 9 cases

Treatment of post-traumatic complex bone infection is very challenging. The two principal bone reconstruction approaches are the single-stage vascularized bone graft technique and the two-stage induced membrane technique (IMT). Here we introduce a modified 2-stage induced membrane technique (MIMT) for complex long bone infection with a major bone defect and a concomitant severe soft tissue lesion. The 2-stage procedure consists of bone debridement, placement of a PMMA spacer and soft tissue reconstruction with a thoracodorsal artery perforator free flap ("Tdap") at stage 1. At stage 2, the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap is elevated and a fibular strut graft (either vascularized of non-vascularized) is placed for bone reconstruction. We retrospectively analyzed the extents of lower extremity, long bone, post-traumatic bone infection treated via MIMT from 2008 to 2020. There were nine such cases (eight males) of mean age 59.8 (range 31 to 79) years. The osteomyelitis durations ranged from 3 to 360 months (mean 53 months). The cortical bone defect sizes was ranged from 9 to 14 cm (mean10.7 cm). All skin resurfacing employed Tdap. Vascularized fibular grafts were placed in six patients and non-vascularized grafts were placed in three. The fibular graft size ranged from 12.5 to 19 cm (mean 16.2 cm). Non-vascularized iliac bone grafts served as the fibula docking sites. Unfortunately, all patients suffered complications before bone union was achieved. One case of plate stress fracture and one case of screw fracture required plate and screw change. In three cases of cellulitis, one resolved by use of intravenous antibiotics, others required plate and screw removal. Wound disruption required re-suture and distal skin flap partial necrosis was covered by perforator-based island flap. One case of fibular stress fracture needed cast for 4 weeks. A peroneal nerve palsy patient recovered spontaneously. Bone union was achieved after 6 months in five patients and after 8 months in three (mean 6.9 months). All patients were able to walk unaided. The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 14 years (mean 6.2 years). MIMT saves the limbs in cases with difficult post-traumatic bone infection. It is valid treatment option for complex bone infections with severe soft tissue lesions. However, even with this technique potential complication must be considered.

The antibiotic bead pouch - a useful technique for temporary soft tissue coverage, infection prevention and therapy in trauma surgery

Soft tissue defects resulting from trauma and musculoskeletal infections can complicate surgical treatment. Appropriate temporary coverage of these defects is essential to achieve the best outcomes for necessary plastic soft tissue defect reconstruction. The antibiotic bead pouch technique is a reasonable surgical approach for managing temporary soft tissue defects following adequate surgical debridement. This technique involves the use of small diameter antibiotic-loaded bone cement beads to fill the dead space created by debridement. By applying antibiotics to the bone cement and covering the beads with an artificial skin graft, high local dosages of antibiotics can be achieved, resulting in the creation of a sterile wound that offers the best starting position for soft tissue and bone defect reconstruction. This narrative review describes the rationale for using this technique, including its advantages and disadvantages, as well as pearls and pitfalls associated with its use in daily practice. In addition, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the literature that has been published since the technique was introduced in surgical practice.

Bone regeneration after marginal bone resection in two-stage treatment of chronic long bone infection - a combined histopathological and clinical pilot study

INTRODUCTION

In chronic bone infection, marginal bone resection avoids large and difficult to reconstruct bone defects. However, there is still a lack of knowledge on bone regeneration during chronic bone infection and bone healing capability after marginal bone resection. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and histopathological outcomes after marginal bone resection in chronic long bone infection. We hypothesized that there is a regenerative bone healing potential after marginal bone resection that results in an acceptable clinical outcome and improved pathohistological bone healing parameters during treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine patients were treated for chronic bone infections in a two-stage manner with marginal bone resection of the infected area and the placement of an antibiotic-loaded polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) spacer at stage one followed by bone reconstruction at stage two combined with systemic antibiotic therapy. Comparable bone samples were harvested at the border region between vital and necrotic bone area during stage one and the identical location during stage two. Control bone samples were harvested from five healthy patients without bone infection. Clinical outcome in terms of infection eradication and bone consolidation were assessed. The phenotypic changes of osteocyte and morphological changes of lacunar-canalicular network were investigated by histological and immunohistochemical staining between the two observation periods. Furthermore, expression levels of major bone formation and resorption markers were investigated by immunohistochemical and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining.

RESULTS

The clinical results with a follow-up of 12.9 months showed that eight of nine patients (88.9%) achieved bone consolidation after a planned two-stage procedure of marginal resection of necrotic bone and consecutive reconstruction. In four of the nine patients (44.4%), additional marginal debridements after stage two had to be performed. After marginal resection at stage one, the improved bone formation ability at stage two was demonstrated by significantly lower percentage of empty lacunae, significantly more mature osteocytes and higher BMP-2 positive cell density, whereas decreased resorption was indicated by significantly lower osteoclast density and RANKL/OPG ratio. In patients requiring additional debridement compared to patients without additional debridements, a significantly higher percentage of empty lacunae was found at stage one.

CONCLUSION

Marginal bone resection combined with local and systemic antibiotic therapy is a feasible treatment option to avoid large bone defects as bone from the marginal resection area seems to have good regenerative potential. Despite a high revision rate of 44.4%, this technique avoids large bone resection and revisions can be done by further marginal debridements.

Comparison of outcomes and operative course between septic and aseptic nonunion in long bones

PURPOSE

The treatment of nonunion of long bones is difficult particularly in the presence of infection, which often involves staged surgical management. There is limited literature to compare the post operative course and outcomes of patients treated for septic versus aseptic nonunion. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine if a difference exists between the number of surgical procedures, time to union, and rate of successful union for these two groups.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single tertiary care center. Patients suffering nonunion of the humerus, tibia and femur were included. Patient demographic data and characteristics of the post operative course were collected to include number and reason for repeat operations, antibiotic course, time to union, and development of a successful union.

RESULTS

About 28 of 122 patients had septic nonunion. After diagnosis of nonunion, the septic group averaged 3.9 surgeries compared to 1.5 in the aseptic group (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of successful union (79.8% versus 85.7%; p = 0.220), though the septic group took 129 days longer on average for successful union. (376 versus 247; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Septic nonunion of long bones is associated with the need for significantly more operations as well as time to union, though union rates remain similar. The identification of infection is critical for both the appropriate treatment as well as counseling patients on the expected post operative course.