Management of ABO-incompatible living-donor liver transplantation: past and present trends

Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Liver Transplantation: Immuno-Pathological Characteristics and Long-Term Follow-Up

The diagnosis of liver antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is challenging and likely under-recognized. The association of AMR with donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and its clinical course in relation to pathologic findings and treatment are ill defined. We identified cases of liver AMR by following the criteria outlined by the 2016 Banff Working Group. Patient demographics, native liver disease, histopathologic findings, treatment type, clinical outcome, and transaminase levels during AMR diagnosis, treatment, and resolution were determined. Patients (n = 8) with AMR average age was 55.2 years (range: 19-68). Seven of eight cases met the Banff criteria for AMR. Personalized treatment regimens consisted of optimization of immunosuppression, intravenous pulse steroids, plasmapheresis, IVIG, rituximab, and bortezomib. Five patients experienced complete resolution of AMR, return of transaminases to baseline, and decreased DSA at long-term follow-up. One patient developed chronic AMR and two patients required re-transplantation. Follow-up after AMR diagnosis ranged from one to 11 years. Because AMR can present at any time, crossmatch, early biopsy, and routine monitoring of DSA levels should be implemented following transaminase elevation to recognize AMR. Furthermore, treatment should be immediately implemented to reverse AMR and prevent graft failure, chronic damage, re-transplantation, and possibly mortality.

Bile duct diffusion-weighted image hyperintensity predicts intrahepatic biliary complications after ABO-incompatible liver transplantation

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the value of the diffusion-weighted image (DWI) for predicting intrahepatic biliary complications (IHBC) after ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi-LT), potentially leading to refractory cholangitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study at a single center, 56 patients who underwent ABOi-LT from March 2021 to January 2023 were analyzed. All received magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and DWI during the postoperative hospitalization. MRCP findings, including bile duct DWI hyperintensity, were assessed. Participants suspected of having a biliary infection or obstructive jaundice underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) during the follow-up. Non-anastomotic biliary strictures on cholangiography were classified as IHBC, as either perihilar or diffuse form. DWI hyperintensity was compared between groups with and without IHBC. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for IHBC.

RESULTS

Of the 55 participants (median age 55 years, 39 males), IHBC was diagnosed in eight patients over a median follow-up of 15.9 months (range 5.6-31.1). Bile duct DWI hyperintensity was observed in 18 patients. Those with DWI hyperintensity exhibited a higher IHBC incidence (6/18, 33.3% vs. 2/36, 5.6%; p = 0.01), and more frequently developed the diffuse type IHBC (4/18, 22.2% vs. 1/36, 2.8%; p = 0.04). Regression analysis indicated that bile duct DWI hyperintensity is an independent risk factor for IHBC (odds ratio (OR) 10.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4, 71.2; p = 0.02) and its diffuse form (OR 15.3; 95% CI 1.2, 187.8; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative DWI hyperintensity of bile ducts can serve as a biomarker predicting IHBC after ABOi-LT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Postoperative diffusion-weighted image hyperintensity of the bile duct can be used as a biomarker to predict intrahepatic biliary complications and aid in identifying candidates who may benefit from additional management for antibody-mediated rejection.

KEY POINTS

Intrahepatic biliary complications following ABO-incompatible liver transplantation can cause biliary stricture and biloma formation. Bile duct hyperintensity on early postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging was associated with increased intrahepatic biliary complication risk. This marker is an additional method for identifying individuals who require intensive management to prevent complications.

I-JAMM-(I): A survey providing an insight into the practices of isoagglutinin titration in ABO incompatible kidney and liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

ABO-incompatible transplantations allow patients to receive timely transplants. Isoagglutinin titration to ascertain levels of incompatible antibodies in the recipient is important in determining patient selection and transplant survivability. To find out the prevalent trends in India, the largest, first of its kind survey was carried out among the transplant centers regarding their practices in isoagglutinin titration.

METHODS

The survey was drafted by a working group of Transfusion and Transplant Immunology specialists from six different centers. Data was obtained via the use of an online questionnaire.

RESULTS

Results were categorized into four categories, Hospital information, Titration methodology, Role of transfusion specialists and cut-off titers. Most centers had a well-established solid-organ transplant program with considerable number of ABO-incompatible transplantations. Most centers performed isoagglutinin titration in Transfusion Medicine department. Column Agglutination Technique (CAT) was the most common method, using EDTA blood samples and freshly-prepared in-house pooled cells. Most centers had a turn-around time of less than 12 h. While the policy for ascertaining baseline and threshold titers is well-defined in ABO-incompatible renal transplants, variations from center to center still exist for ABO-incompatible liver transplants. Most centers required a Transfusion Medicine consultation for the patients before such transplants.

CONCLUSION

With increasing ABO-incompatible kidney and liver transplants across the country, the role of Transfusion medicine specialists has become vital in pre-conditioning regimes enabling the viability and success of such transplants. This was a unique survey that provided a snapshot of current trends and practices of isoagglutinin titration for ABO-incompatible transplants in India.

Implementing living-donor pediatric liver transplantation in Southern Vietnam: 15-year results and perspectives

BACKGROUND

ND2 in Ho Chi Minh City is currently the only public center that performs PLT in Southern Vietnam. In 2005, the first PLT was successfully performed, with support from Belgian experts. This study reviews the implementation of PLT at our center and evaluates the results and challenges.

METHODS

Implementation of PLT at ND2 required medico-surgical team building and extensive improvement of hospital facilities. Records of 13 transplant recipients from 2005 to 2020 were studied retrospectively. Short- and long-term complications, as well as the survival rates, were reported.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 8.3 ± 5.7 years. Surgical complications included one case of hepatic artery thrombosis that was successfully repaired, one case of colon perforation resulting in death from sepsis, and two cases of bile leak that were drained surgically. PTLD was observed in five patients, of whom three died. There were no cases of retransplantation. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year patient survival rates were 84.6%, 69.2%, and 69.2%, respectively. There were no cases of complication or death among the donors.

CONCLUSION

Living-donor PLT was developed at ND2 for providing a life-saving treatment to children with end-stage liver disease. Early surgical complication rate was low, and the patient survival rate was satisfactory at 1 year. Long-term survival decreased considerably due to PTLD. Future challenges include surgical autonomy and improvement of long-term medical follow-up with a particular emphasis on prevention and management of Epstein-Barr virus-related disease.

Strategies for ABO Incompatible Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is a definitive treatment for the decompensated liver cirrhosis and fulminant liver failure. With limited availability of cadaveric liver allograft, ABO incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) plays an important part in further expansion of donor pool. Over the years, with the introduction of Rituximab and improving desensitisation protocol, outcomes of ABOi LDLT are on par with ABO compatible LT. However, ABOi LDLT protocol varies markedly from centre to centre. Intravenous Rituximab followed by plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption effectively reduce ABO isoagglutinins titre before transplant, thereby reducing the risk of antibody mediated rejection in the post-transplant period. Local infusion therapy and splenectomy are not used routinely at most of the centres in Rituximab era. Post-transplant immunosuppression usually consists of standard triple drug regime, and tacrolimus trough levels are targeted at higher level compared to ABO compatible LT. Introduction of newer therapies like Belatacept and Obinutuzumab hold promise to further improve outcomes and reduce the risk of antibody mediated rejection related complications. ABOi LT in emergency situations like acute liver failure and deceased donor LT is challenging due to limited time period for desensitisation protocol before transplant, and available evidence are still limited but encouraging.

ABO-Incompatible Liver Transplantation under the Desensitization Protocol with Rituximab: Effect on Biliary Microbiota and Metabolites

Background: ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi LT) under the desensitization protocol with rituximab had excellent survival outcomes comparable to those of ABO-compatible liver transplantation (ABOc LT). In this work, we explored the effect of ABOi LT on recipients from the perspective of biliary microbiota and metabonomics. Methods: Liver transplant (LT) recipients treated at our center were enrolled in the study. In total, 6 ABOi LT recipients and 12 ABOc LT recipients were enrolled, and we collected their bile five times (during LT and at 2 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month after LT). The collected samples were used for 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry analysis. Results: We obtained 90 bile samples. Whether in group ABOi LT or ABOc LT, the most common phyla in all of the samples were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. The most common genera were Lactobacillus, Weissella, Klebsiella, Pantoea and Lactococcus. There was no significant difference in the diversity between the two groups at 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month after LT. However, the biggest disparities between the ABOi LT recipients and ABOc LT recipients were observed 2 days after LT, including increased biodiversity with a higher ACE, Chao1, OBS and Shannon index (p < 0.05), and more Staphylococcus in ABOi LT and binary−Jaccard dissimilarity, which indicated varying β-diversity (p = 0.046). These differences were not observed at 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month after LT. The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed that the composition of the bile microbiota did not change significantly within 1 month after LT by longitudinal comparison. In an analysis of the bile components, the metabolites were not significantly different every time. However, four enrichment KEGG pathways were observed among the groups. Conclusion: These findings suggest that ABOi LT under the desensitization protocol with rituximab did not significantly affect the biliary microbiota and metabolites of recipients.

ABO-incompatible Pediatric Liver Transplantation With Antibody and B-cell Depletion-free Immunosuppressive Protocol in High Consanguinity Communities

The success of orthotopic liver transplantation as a life-saving treatment has led to new indications and a greater competition for organ grafts. Pediatric patients with acute liver-related crises can benefit from orthotopic liver transplantation, but organ availability in the limited time can be a major obstacle. Crossing ABO blood group barriers could increase the organs available to such patients.

METHODS

From November 2010 to June 2015, 176 children aged 0.2-to18 y were transplanted in the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center. Out of those, 19 children were transplanted across blood group barriers (ABO incompatible). The underlying diseases were biliary atresia (n = 6); progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2 (n = 4); Crigler-Najjar syndrome (n = 3); hepatoblastoma (n = 2); and urea cycle disorder, Caroli disease, cryptogenic cirrhosis, and neonatal sclerosing cholangitis (n = 1 each). Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, mycophenolate, tacrolimus, and steroids. Pretransplant prophylactic plasmapheresis, high-dose immunoglobulins, and rituximab were not administered.

RESULTS

The grafts were from living donors (n = 17) and deceased donors (n = 2). Living donor morbidity was nil. The recipient median age was 21 mo (5-70 mo). After a median follow-up of 44 mo, 2 recipients (10%) died because of sepsis, 1 because of uncontrolled acute myeloid leukemia. The overall rejection rate was 7%, and no grafts were lost because of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). HLA matching was 3.8 of 6 (A, B, DR), and there were 2 patients presented with acute cellular rejection, 1 patient with AMR, and 1 patient with biliary strictures.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO incompatible liver transplantation is a feasible and life-saving option even with antibody and B-cell depletion-free protocol without increasing the risks for AMR. We speculate that this excellent result is most likely because of presence of relatively low titer ABO isoagglutinins and the high HLA match compatibility caused by habit of longstanding interfamilial marriages as typical of Saudi Arabia.

ABO incompatible living donor liver transplant with antibody titer of 1:4: First case report from Pakistan

Introduction and importance

The most common reason for live liver donor rejection is ABO incompatibility. With breaching this incompatibility barrier, probably an additional 25%–35% of liver transplantation (LT) procedures would become possible. Also, ABOi-LT can be lifesaving in acute settings. Initially, ABOi-LT reported a poor prognosis secondary to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) which is more common in ABOi allograft recipients. AMR may be avoided by desensitization. Various desensitization protocols are practiced globally, however, there is no consensus available on the optimal desensitization protocol for the ABOi-LT. The ABO-incompatible (ABOi) can expand the liver donor pool tremendously. We report the first case of ABO incompatible-liver transplantation (ABOi-LT) from Pakistan.

Case presentation

A 48 years old male, presented with decompensated liver diseaseand hepatocellular carcinoma secondary to HCV infection. LT was advised as the optimal modality of treatment. Due to the non-availability of a compatible donor, ABOi-LT was planned.His daughter agreed to donate.Pre-LT desensitization was started on the 23rd-day pre-LT with intravenous (I/V) rituximab 700 mg/body (375 mg/m²) along with I/V Bortezomib 2mg (1.3 mg/m²⁾. Bortezomib was repeated subcutaneously (S/C) on the 20th, 16th, and 13th days pre-LT. One week before LT oral Mycophenolate mofetil 500 mg and Tacrolimus 1 mg were started twice daily. Therapeutic plasmapheresis was done on the 5th, 3rd, and 1st-day pre-LT. Per-operatively, Basiliximab was administeredI/V with a dose of 0.8 gm/kg during the anhepatic phase. Anti-A & Anti-B titer level was determined on the 5th day before plasmapheresis and repeated on the 2nd and 1st-day pre-LT. Then post-LT plasmapheresis was done onthe 15th day and at 3 months. The CD 19 activity was determined one day before LT and on the 15th-day post-LT. His LT was performed uneventfully and was discharged on the 15th postoperative day (POD). However, on the 26th POD, he was diagnosed with left subclavian vein thrombosis which was treated successfully with anticoagulation therapy for 6 months. Till the last follow up patient is doing well.

Clinical discussion

Desensitization is the removal of preformed anti-ABO antibodies and depleting serum B cells production. Antibody-mediated rejection irreversibly damages the graft and predisposes it to graft failure. The prognosis of ABOi-LT has dramatically improved since the introduction of desensitization protocols.

Conclusion

Antibody-mediated rejection may be avoided by desensitization. The intravascular infusion therapies and splenectomy can be omitted from the desensitization protocol. ABO-i LT can tremendously increase the liver donor pool.

•

Antibody-mediated rejection could be avoided by desensitization.

•

There is no consensus available on a standardized ABOi-LDLT desensitization protocol.

•

We report the first case of ABOi-LDLT from Pakistan with an antibody titer of 1:4.

•

We used bortezomib along with rituximab and plasmapheresis as a desensitization protocol.

•

In our case, we managed to reduce the anti-body titer to as low as 1:4 before the transplant.

Excellent outcome following emergency deceased donor ABO-incompatible liver transplantation using rituximab and antigen specific immunoadsorption

BACKGROUND

The acceptance of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) liver grafts will expand the donor pool for a patient in urgent need for a liver transplantation (LT). Here we report our results with emergency ABOi DD (deceased donor) LT using rituximab and antigen specific immunoadsorption.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

2009 to 2019 we performed 20 ABOi DD LTs (adults n = 17, children n = 3) for patients in urgent need for a LT. Immunosuppression consisted of rituximab (n = 20) and basiliximab (n = 15) or anti-thymocyte globuline (n = 4), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG; n = 6), tacrolimus, prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil. Fifteen patients were treated with IA (n = 14) or both IA and plasmapheresis (PP; n = 1) pre-transplant and 18 patients were treated with IA (n = 15) or both IA and PP (n = 3) post-transplant. The median pre-transplant MELD- score was 40 (range 18-40). Patient and graft survival and complications were compared to a 1:4 case matched control group of ABO-identical or compatible (ABOid/c) DDLT.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3- and 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 85, 85 and 78% for the ABOi recipients and not significantly different compared to ABOid/c controls. Only one ABOi patient developed antibody-mediated rejection.

CONCLUSION

Patient and graft survival after emergency ABOi DDLT using rituximab and immunoadorption was equal to ABOid/DDLT. ABOi DD LT was a successful approach to expand the donor pool for patients in urgent need for a liver graft.

Clinical outcomes after ABO-incompatible liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABOi-LT) is increasingly used to overcome donor shortage. Evidence about disadvantage and advantage in comparison with ABO-compatible liver transplantation (ABOc-LT) needs to be performed in the early and late periods. Herein, We compared the short-term and long-term outcomes between ABOi-LT and ABOc-LT cohorts.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis based on the observation studies which included outcomes at ≥1 year after ABOi-LT and ABOc-LT procedures, based on the MEDLINE (via Pubmed), the Cochrance Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and EMBASE (via Ovid) systems. Two researchers independently screened each study according to the pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria to assess the quality of each study and extracted data from published studies. The primary outcome indicators were all-cause mortality and graft survival at 1, 3 and 5 years after transplantation. In the meta-analysis, we based on the value of heterogeneity using a fixed-effect and a random-effect. A fixed-effect model was used if the value of I2 was less than or equal 50%; and a random-effect model was used if the value of I2 was greater than 50%.

FINDINGS

Out of 335 identified records, 29 records with 10,783 patients with liver transplants; 2137 of them were ABOi-LTs and the remaining 8646 were ABOc-LTs. There was no significant difference at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year in all-cause mortality, death-censored graft survival and complication incidence rate between ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi-LDLT) group and ABO-compatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOc-LDLT) group. Compared with ABO-compatible deceased donor liver transplantation (ABOc-DDLT), ABO-incompatible deceased donor liver transplantation (ABOi-DDLT) had a higher 1-year all-cause mortality, and the value of totally pooled odds ratio (OR) was 1.89 (1.28,2.80). However, there was no significant difference at 3-year and 5-year all-cause mortality between ABOi-DDLT and ABOc-DDLT groups. ABOi-DDLT group had a lower 1-year and 5-year death-censored graft survival than ABOc-DDLT, as the value of totally pooled OR was 1.91 (1.41,2.60) and 1.52 (1.12,2.05), respectively. No significant difference was detected at 3-year death-censored graft survival between ABOi-DDLT and ABOc-DDLT groups. ABOi-DDLT group had a higher complication incidence rate than ABOc-DDLT, and the value of totally pooled OR was 2.26 (1.53,3.33). We found no obvious bias except for the complication of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT; P = 0.038).

IN CONCLUSION

The short-term and long-term outcomes were worse after ABOi-DDLT than ABOc-DDLT in the all-cause mortality, death-censored graft survival, and complication incidence rate. However, the same outcomes were essentially comparable between ABOi-LDLT vs. ABOc-LDLT cohorts. Considering the current shortage of liver donors, we believe that ABOi-LT from living donor and deceased donors can save lives under emergency situations.

Is 0.6% Reasonable as the Minimum Requirement of the Graft-to-recipient Weight Ratio Regardless of Lobe Selection in Adult Living-donor Liver Transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Several studies reported favorable outcomes of small-for-size grafts with graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0.8% in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, their indications should be carefully determined because they must have been indicated for low-risk cases over larger grafts with 0.8% ≤ GRWR. Furthermore, evidence for minimum requirements of GRWR remains inconclusive. We investigated the safety of small-for-size grafts against larger grafts by adjusting for confounding risk factors, and minimum requirement of graft volume in adult LDLT.

METHODS

We enrolled 417 cases of primary adult-to-adult LDLT in our center between 2006 and 2019. The outcomes of small grafts (0.6% ≤ GRWR < 0.8%, n = 113) and large grafts (0.8% ≤ GRWR, n = 289) were mainly compared using a multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis showed that small grafts were not a significant risk factor for overall graft survival (GS). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, small grafts did not significantly affect overall GS regardless of lobe selection (versus large grafts). However, GRWR < 0.6% was associated with poor overall GS. Although there were no significant differences between the 2 groups, unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curves of small grafts were inferior to those of large grafts in subcohorts with ABO incompatibility, and donor age ≥50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar outcomes were observed for small and large graft use regardless of lobe selection. 0.6% in GRWR was reasonable as the minimum requirement of graft volume in LDLT. However, small grafts should be indicated carefully for high-risk cases.

ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation with high preoperative antibody titer: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABOi-LDLT) is essential for expanding the donor pool. ABOi-LDLT prognosis has improved since desensitization treatment with rituximab; however, patients with high antibody titers are considered to be at high risk of antibody mediated rejection (AMR). Nevertheless, the preoperative antibody titer cutoff levels that preclude ABOi-LDLT have not yet been determined. In this study, the highest preoperative antibody titer was 1:4096, and the recipient had good outcomes. There has been only one report of good outcomes with a preoperative antibody titer of more than 1:4096. We hypothesized that high preoperative antibody titers in ABOi-LDLT may not be associated with AMR in protocols involving rituximab.

CASE PRESENTATION

The recipient was a 22-year-old man with biliary atresia and underwent ABOi-LDLT (B to O). We administered 500 mg of rituximab 14 days prior and then 300 mg of rituximab one day prior to ABOi-LDLT. The recipients preoperative IgG antibody titer was 1:4096. Postoperative immunosuppressive protocol involved steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. The patient had satisfactory graft function three years following ABOi-LDLT.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The antibody that is responsible for posttransplant AMR should be newly synthesized after transplantation as a result of sensitization by antigens on the vascular endothelial cells of the graft. In ABOi-LDLT, natural antibodies may not cause AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important factor for preventing AMR in recipients undergoing ABOi-LDLT is the suppression of de novo antibodies. High preoperative antibody titers may not necessarily preclude ABOi-LDLT, provided that rituximab is used in desensitization.

Is ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation Really a Good Alternative for Pediatric Recipients?

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been proposed to compensate for donor shortage. To date, few studies have reported detailed ABOi LDLT results in large series of pediatric patients. C4d complement deposition in graft capillaries has been reported to be associated with antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was conducted, comparing clinical outcomes of each of 34 consecutive pediatric ABOi LDLT recipients with those of 2 non-ABOi pairs (n = 68), matched according to pre-transplant diagnostic criteria, age, and date of transplantation. In addition, we studied the C4d immunostaining pattern in 22 ABOi and in 36 non-ABOi recipients whose liver biopsy was performed within the first 4 post-transplant weeks for suspected acute rejection.

RESULTS

The incidence of biliary complications was higher in ABOi recipients (p < 0.05), as were the incidence of acute humoral rejection (p < 0.01) and the incidence of retransplantation (p < 0.05). All children who required retransplantation were older than 1 year at the time of ABOi LDLT. Positive C4d immunostaining was observed in 13/22 (59%) ABOi recipients versus 3/36 (8.3%) non-ABOi recipients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

ABOi LDLT is a feasible option for pediatric end-stage liver disease but carries increased risks for the recipient, especially for children older than 1 year, even with a specific preparation protocol. C4d immunostaining may be a hallmark of acute humoral rejection in ABOi liver transplantation.

Living donor liver transplantation for small infants aged less than 6 months: The experience of a single institute

PURPOSE

Liver transplantation (LT) for small infants < 6 months old is rare but becoming common as perioperative care improves. In Taiwan, living donor LT (LDLT) has expanded indications but is rarely performed for this age group because of unfavorable outcomes in the literature. We evaluated LDLT outcomes of patients <6 months old.

METHODS

We identified infants < 6 months old undergoing LDLT between 2004 and 2019 at our hospital. Variables related to recipients, donors, surgeries, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Nine patients were identified. Indications for LT were biliary atresia (n = 2), Alagille syndrome (n = 1), protein C deficiency (n = 1), and acute liver failure (n = 5), including two patients with neonatal hemochromatosis, one with herpes simplex hepatitis, one with giant cell hepatitis with autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and one with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Median age and weight at LT were 129 days and 4.8 kg, respectively. Graft types included left lateral segment (LLS, n = 4), hyper-reduced LLS (n = 4), and monosegment (n = 1). The median graft-to-recipient weight ratio was 4%. The median follow-up period was 14 months (range, 8 days to 127 months) with two mortalities, and two patients were totally weaned off immunosuppressants. Adjuvant therapies were required for patients with giant cell hepatitis and hemophagocytosis. Preoperative reconstructive imaging for estimating graft thickness facilitated surgical planning.

CONCLUSION

Although LDLT is difficult to perform for small infants, outcomes are favorable and mainly dependent on underlying causes in addition to technical innovations.

ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation with Reduced Rituximab Dose: A Retrospective Analysis of 65 Patients - Can We Fast-Track Liver Transplant Surgery and Improve Long-Term Survival?

BACKGROUND ABO-incompatible (ABO-i) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a feasible alternative for donor liver allograft in emergency situations, especially in Asia, where deceased-donor organs remain scarce. The reported outcomes of ABO-i LDLT after optimal desensitization are comparable to those of ABO-compatible LDLT. In this retrospective study, we found improved outcomes after ABO-i LDLT with a low-dose rituximab in combination with double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) and prophylactic antibiotic therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between January 2006 and December 2018, a total of 65 recipients underwent ABO-i LDLT surgeries at our center. The study cohort consisted of 50 recipients (Era III) who underwent ABO-i LDLT using the recently updated desensitization protocol, which included rituximab 200 mg intravenous injection once a week prior to LDLT, 4 sessions of DFPP in all patients, and prophylactic antibiotics for 3 months. RESULTS The 3-year overall survival rate achieved in ABO-i LDLT patients was 72.7% (66.6% for Era I and 33.3% for Era II patients). In the study population, 11 patients developed complications due to infection. Five of these patients (10%) died due to overwhelming sepsis. Four patients (8%) were diagnosed with multiple strictures and diffusely scattered dilatation of intrahepatic bile ducts on computed tomography, without vascular complications. Three of them had evidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). CONCLUSIONS Our experience shows that the ABO-i LDLT protocol of lowered rituximab combined with pre-transplant sessions of plasmapheresis and a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen can be effective in chronic liver failure patients with clinical urgency in the absence of an ABO-compatible donor. Fast-tracking the use of ABO-i LDLT is feasible in patients with an acute liver failure (ALF) and can safely increase the donor liver pool, with an acceptable outcome.

The Human Immune Response to Cadaveric and Living Donor Liver Allografts

The liver is an important contributor to the human immune system and it plays a pivotal role in the creation of both immunoreactive and tolerogenic conditions. Liver transplantation provides the best chance of survival for both children and adults with liver failure or cancer. With current demand exceeding the number of transplantable livers from donors following brain death, improved knowledge, technical advances and the desire to prevent avoidable deaths has led to the transplantation of organs from living, ABO incompatible (ABOi), cardiac death donors and machine based organ preservation with acceptable results. The liver graft is the most well-tolerated, from an immunological perspective, of all solid organ transplants. Evidence suggests successful cessation of immunosuppression is possible in ~20–40% of liver transplant recipients without immune mediated graft injury, a state known as “operational tolerance.” An immunosuppression free future following liver transplantation is an ambitious but perhaps not unachievable goal. The initial immune response following transplantation is a sterile inflammatory process mediated by the innate system and the mechanisms relate to the preservation-reperfusion process. The severity of this injury is influenced by graft factors and can have significant consequences. There are minimal experimental studies that delineate the differences in the adaptive immune response to the various forms of liver allograft. Apart from ABOi transplants, antibody mediated hyperacute rejection is rare following liver transplant. T-cell mediated rejection is common following liver transplantation and its incidence does not differ between living or deceased donor grafts. Transplantation in the first year of life results in a higher rate of operational tolerance, possibly due to a bias toward Th2 cytokines (IL4, IL10) during this period. This review further describes the current understanding of the immunological response toward liver allografts and highlight the areas of this topic yet to be fully understood.

Prognostic index consisting of early post-transplant variables <2 weeks in adult living-donor liver transplantation

AIM

Six-month recipient mortality after adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains high. Early and accurate prediction of recipient outcome and continuous monitoring of recipient severity after surgery are both essential for guiding appropriate care. This study was designed to identify early post-transplant parameters associated with 6-month mortality, and thereby to construct a discriminatory prognostic index (PI).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 400 consecutive primary adult-to-adult LDLTs in our center (2006-2017). Perioperative variables were comprehensively analyzed for their accuracy in predicting recipient mortality by comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of each factor.

RESULTS

The AUROCs of preoperative predictive factors, for example, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and donor age, were 0.56 and 0.64, respectively, whereas those of post-transplant platelet count (PLT), total bilirubin (T-BIL), and prothrombin time - international normalized ratio (INR) on postoperative day (POD)-7-14 were 0.71/0.84, 0.68/0.82, and 0.71/0.78, respectively. Logistic regression analysis provided a formula: PI_POD-14  = 3.39 + 0.12 × PLT_POD-14  - 0.09 × T-BIL_POD-14  - 1.23 × INR_POD-14 , indicating a high AUROC of 0.87. Recipient 6-month survival with PI_POD-14  < 2.38 (n = 173) was 71.7%, whereas that with PI_POD-14  ≥ 2.38 (n = 222) was 97.7% (P < 0.001). The AUROCs of PI_POD-7 were as high as 0.8 in the subgroups with younger donors (<50 years of age), right lobe grafts, ABO-identical/compatible combinations, or low MELD score (<20), indicating usefulness of PI to identify unexpectedly complicated cases within the first week.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel, post-transplant survival estimator, PI, accurately predicts recipient 6-month mortality within 1-2 weeks after adult LDLT. Daily monitoring of PI could facilitate early interventions including retransplantation in critically ill patients.

ABO-nonidentical liver transplantation from a deceased donor and clinical outcomes following antibody rebound: A case report

BACKGROUND

Although ABO-nonidentical and ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (LT) are other options for end-stage liver disease treatment, the development of antibodies against blood group antigens (anti-A/B antibodies) is still a challenge in managing and follow-up of the recipients.

CASE SUMMARY

A 56-year-old male with end-stage liver disease with rapid deterioration and poor prognosis was considered to receive a deceased ABO-nonidentical liver graft. All required tests were performed according to our pre-LT diagnostic protocol. The orthotopic LT procedure involving O+ donor and A1B+ recipient was performed. Our treatment strategy to overcome the antibody‐mediated rejection included a systemic triple immunosuppressive regimen: methylprednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. The immunological desensitization consisted of the chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulins. The patient was also on antibiotic treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefotaxime, and metronidazole. On the 10^th postoperative day, high titers of IgG anti-A and anti-B antibodies were found in the patient’s plasma. We performed a liver biopsy, which revealed histological evidence of antibody-mediated rejection, but the rejection was excluded according to the Banff classification. The therapy was continued until the titer decreased significantly on the 18^th postoperative day. Despite the antibiotic, antifungal, and antiviral treatment, the patient deteriorated and developed septic shock with anuria and pancytopenia. The conservative treatment was unsuccessful, which lead to the patient’s fatal outcome on the 42^nd postoperative day.

CONCLUSION

We present a patient who underwent ABO-nonidentical LT from a deceased donor. Even though we implemented the latest technological advancements and therapeutic approaches in the management of the patient and the initial results were promising, due to severe infectious complications, the outcome was fatal.

Older Donor Age Is a Risk Factor for Negative Outcomes After Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Small-for-Size Grafts

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) using small-for-size grafts (SFSGs), ie, a graft with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0.8%, has been a challenge that should be carefully dealt with, and risk factors in this category are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to examine the risk factors and outcomes of ALDLT using SFSGs over a 13-year period in 121 patients who had undergone their first ALDLT using SFSGs. Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), early graft loss, and 1-year mortality were encountered in 21.6%, 14.9%, and 18.4% of patients, respectively. By multivariate analysis, older donor age (≥45 years) was an independent risk factor for SFSS (odds ratio [OR], 4.46; P = 0.004), early graft loss (OR, 4.11; P = 0.02), and 1-year mortality (OR, 3.76; P = 0.02). Child-Pugh C class recipients were associated with a higher risk of SFSS development (P = 0.013; OR, 7.44). Despite no significant difference between GRWR categories in the multivariate outcome analysis of the whole population, in the survival analysis of the 2 donor age groups, GRWR <0.6% was associated with significantly lower 1-year survival than the other GRWR categories in the younger donor group. Moreover, in the high final portal venous pressure (PVP) group (>15 mm Hg), younger ABO-compatible donors showed 100% 1-year survival with a significant difference from the group of other donors. Older donor age was an independent risk factor for SFSS, early graft loss, and 1-year mortality after ALDLT using SFSGs. GRWR should not be <0.6%, and PVP modulation is indicated when grafts from older or ABO-incompatible donors are used.

Impact of Donor Age on Recipient Survival in Adult-to-Adult Living-donor Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of donor age on recipient outcome after living-donor partial liver transplantation (LDLT).

BACKGROUND

Donor age is a well-known prognostic factor in deceased donor liver transplantation; however, its role in LDLT remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 315 consecutive cases of primary adult-to-adult LDLT in our center between April 2006 and March 2014. Recipients were divided into 5 groups according to the donor age: D-20s (n = 60); D-30s (n = 72); D-40s (n = 57); D-50s (n = 94); and D-60s (n = 32). The recipient survival and the association with various clinical factors were investigated.

RESULTS

Recipient survival proportions were significantly higher in D-20s compared with all the other groups (P = 0.008, < 0.001, < 0.001, and = 0.006, vs D-30s, -40s, -50s, and -60s, respectively), whereas there was no association between recipient survival and their own age. There are 3 typical relationships between donors and recipients in adult-to-adult LDLT: from child-to-parent, between spouses/siblings, and from parent-to-child. The overall survival in child-to-parent was significantly higher than in spouses/siblings (P = 0.002) and in parent-to-child (P = 0.005), despite significantly higher recipient age in child-to-parent [59 (42-69) years, P < 0.001]. Contrastingly, parent-to-child exhibited the lowest survival, despite the youngest recipient age [26 (20-43) years, P < 0.001]. In addition, younger donor age exhibited significantly better recipient survival both in hepatitis C virus-related and in non-hepatitis C virus diseases. Univariate and multivariate analyses both demonstrated that donor age and graft-type (right-sided livers) are independent prognostic factors for recipient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor age is an independent, strong prognostic factor in adult-to-adult LDLT.

Immunologic strategies and outcomes in ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation

Antibody mediated rejection (AMR) after adult ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation (ABO-I LDLT) induced hepatic necrosis or diffuse intrahepatic biliary complications, which were related with poor graft and patient survival. Various desensitization protocols have been used to overcome these problems. Since using rituximab, the outcomes of ABO-I LDLT show a similar survival rate to those of ABO-compatible living donor liver transplantation. However, diffuse bile duct complications still occur after ABO-I LDLT. We have reviewed the past and current immune strategies for desensitization and to provide outcomes and ABO incompatibility-related complications in ABO-I LDLT.

Infectious Complications in Adult ABO-Incompatible Liver Transplantation: Our Preliminary Experience

The number of ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantations (ABO-I LDLT) has increased owing to the use of preoperative rituximab for immunosuppression. However, controversy remains regarding adequate immunosuppression owing to rejection and infection. Here, we present 5 cases of our ABO-I LDLT experience, emphasizing rejection and infectious complications, retrospectively. The treatment protocol included prophylactic rituximab followed by plasma exchange prior to transplantation, splenectomy, and immunosuppressive and prophylactic antibiotic regimens after transplantation. Four of the 5 patients also received local infusion therapy via the portal vein. Neither hyperacute nor antibody-mediated rejection occurred. All grafts were functioning well at discharge. Rehospitalization was required for 2 patients due to severe infection within 6 months of transplantation. Invasive aspergillosis was successfully treated in 1 patient, but the other patient died from severe sepsis with overwhelming postsplenectomy infection syndrome. Our results confirm that, although improved immunosuppressive therapy markedly reduces rejection in ABO-I LDLT, it is also associated with an increased risk of various life-threatening infections.

Low Titers of Antidonor ABO Antibodies After ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Background

The ABO blood-type barrier in kidney and liver transplantation has been overcome by aggressive treatments such as B cell depletion using rituximab. However, the long-term effects of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation (ABO-I LTx) on immunological status have not previously been studied. Here, we assessed whether long-term immune hyporesponsiveness against ABO blood-group antigens was retained.

Methods

We recruited 81 patients, 75 patients who had survived ABO-I LTx without retransplantation and 6 patients who had survived after retransplantation using blood type-compatible grafts. The time between ABO-I LTx and outpatient visits for blood sampling for this study ranged from 1.1 to 16.8 years. We also evaluated patients' backgrounds and postoperative therapies.

Results

Overall, antidonor ABO antibody titers in the 75 patients without retransplantation decreased during long-term follow-up. In the subset of 40 patients with blood type O, anti-nondonor ABO antibody titers did not decrease and were significantly higher than antidonor ABO antibody titers. In addition, long-term antidonor ABO antibody titers were significantly lower in pediatric patients than in adult patients. In the 6 patients who were retransplanted with blood type–compatible grafts, antidonor ABO antibody immunoglobulin G titers remained low, but IgM titers increased slightly long after removal of the ABO-incompatible graft.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that donor-specific hyporesponsiveness remains after ABO-I LTx, particularly in pediatric patients. Long-term persistence of blood antigens may contribute to this donor-specific hyporesponsiveness.

A High Portal Venous Pressure Gradient Increases Gut-Related Bacteremia and Consequent Early Mortality After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Portal hypertension (PHT) is defined as a portal venous pressure gradient (PVPG) exceeding 5 mm Hg, which results in severe clinical manifestations. However, the validity of intraoperative PVPG monitoring and the association between PHT and bacterial translocation after liver transplantation remain unclear.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 223 patients who underwent primary adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation from 2008 to 2015 were divided into 2 groups based on the PVPG at the end of the operation: high PVPG (>5 mm Hg, n = 69) and low PVPG (≤5 mm Hg, n = 154). The clinical factors were compared between the groups, and the association between a high PVPG and posttransplant bacteremia/bacterial infections was investigated.

RESULTS

The high PVPG group had a significantly higher incidence of bacteremia (46% vs 24%, P < 0.001), higher 90-day mortality rate (20% vs 7%, P = 0.002), and poorer 1-year survival (71% vs 86%, P = 0.006). The high PVPG group had a particularly higher incidence of bacteremia caused by "gut bacteria" including Enterobacteriaceae, Bacteroides spp., and Enterococcus spp. (29% vs 12%, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that a PVPG greater than 5 mm Hg (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-5.55; P = 0.017) was an independent predictor of bacteremia due to gut bacteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring of the PVPG is clinically meaningful for predicting patients' prognosis. In particular, a high PVPG with a threshold of 5 mm Hg at the end of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation may increase gut-related bacteremia through the mechanism of bacterial translocation, resulting in early mortality.

ABO-incompatible deceased donor pediatric liver transplantation: Novel titer-based management protocol and outcomes

ABO-ILT have re-emerged as an alternate option for select patients awaiting transplant. However, treatment protocols for children undergoing deceased donor ABO-ILT are not standardized. We implemented a novel IS protocol for children undergoing deceased donor ABO-ILT based on pretransplant IH titers. Children with high pretransplant IH titers (≥1:32) underwent an enhanced IS protocol including plasmapheresis, rituximab, IVIG, and mycophenolate, while children with IH titers ≤1:16 received steroids and tacrolimus. We retrospectively assessed our outcomes of ABO-ILT with ABO-compatible recipients of similar age and diagnosis over a 2-year period. Ten children with median age of 8.9 months underwent ABO-ILT, 4 of 10 patients underwent enhanced IS due to high IH titers. Rates of complications (rejection, infections, biliary, and vascular) at both 1 year and up to 3 years post-transplant were comparable between the groups. Patients with ABO-ILT had good graft function with 100% survival at a median follow-up of 3.3 years. In conclusion, IS tailored to pretransplant IH titers in pediatric deceased donor ABO-ILT is feasible and can achieve outcomes similar to ABO-CLT at 1 and 3 years post-transplantation.

Is Portal Venous Pressure Modulation Still Indicated for All Recipients in Living Donor Liver Transplantation?

There is a consensus that portal venous pressure (PVP) modulation prevents portal hypertension (PHT) and consequent complications after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). However, PVP-modulation strategies need to be updated based on the most recent findings. We examined our 10-year experience of PVP modulation and reevaluated whether it was necessary for all recipients or for selected recipients in ALDLT. In this retrospective study, 319 patients who underwent ALDLT from 2007 to 2016 were divided into 3 groups according to the necessity and results of PVP modulation: not indicated (n = 189), indicated and succeeded (n = 92), and indicated but failed (n = 38). Graft survival and associations with various clinical factors were investigated. PVP modulation was performed mainly by splenectomy to lower final PVP to ≤15 mm Hg. Successful PVP modulation improved prognosis to be equivalent to that of patients who did not need modulation, whereas failed modulation was associated with increased incidence of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS; P = 0.003) and early graft loss (EGL; P = 0.006). Among patients with failed modulation, donor age ≥ 45 years (hazard ratio [HR], 3.67; P = 0.02) and ABO incompatibility (HR, 3.90; P = 0.01) were independent risk factors for graft loss. Survival analysis showed that PVP > 15 mm Hg was related to poor prognosis in grafts from either ABO-incompatible or older donor age ≥ 45 years (P < 0.001), but it did not negatively affect grafts from ABO-compatible/identical and young donor age < 45 years (P = 0.27). In conclusion, intentional PVP modulation is not necessarily required in all recipients. Although grafts from both ABO-compatible/identical and young donors can tolerate PHT, lowering PVP to ≤15 mm Hg is a key to preventing SFSS and consequent EGL with grafts from either ABO-incompatible or older donors.

Comparison of Liver Graft Regeneration Between ABO-Compatible and ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was accepted as a feasible therapy for end-stage liver disease after the introduction of rituximab. The present study investigated the association between ABO incompatibility and graft regeneration in patients who underwent LDLT. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 335 adult patients who underwent elective LDLT were divided into ABO-compatible (ABOc) and ABOi LDLT groups using propensity score (PS) matching of graft regeneration-related factors. Postoperative serial changes in graft volumes were compared between the groups. The factors associated with graft volume on postoperative day (POD) 21 were investigated in patients who underwent ABOi LDLT. RESULTS In total, 300 (89.6%) patients underwent ABOc LDLT and 35 (10.4%) patients underwent ABOi LDLT. After PS matching, the ABOc and ABOi groups each included 32 paired patients. The absolute liver graft volumes on POD 21 were significantly lower in the ABOi group than those in the ABOc group in the PS-matched patients (1098.4 [964.0-1,162.0] vs. 1202.0 [1107.8-1455.2] mL; p=0.007). Major complications, including overall patient mortality during the follow-up period, did not differ between the groups. In patients who underwent ABOi LDLT, the preoperative graft volume/standard liver volume ratio and CD4+ cell level on POD 14 were independent factors related to liver graft volume on POD 21. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that ABO incompatibility could affect postoperative liver graft regeneration. Therefore, graft regeneration must be investigated using a volumetric assessment in patients who have undergone ABOi LDLT.

Increasing use of therapeutic apheresis as a liver-saving modality

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is used for temporary support of liver function in patients presenting with early graft dysfunction after liver transplantation (LT) or liver surgery. We analyzed the effect of therapeutic apheresis on patients with liver disease.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and August 2016, 93 apheresis procedures were performed for 26 patients at our institution. Anti-ABO isoagglutination immunoglobulin (Ig) M titer was checked using a type A and type B 3% red blood cell (RBC) suspension in saline with two-fold serial dilutions of patient serum. Anti-ABO isoagglutination IgG titer was checked by a type A and B 0.8% RBC suspension using a low-ionic strength/Coombs card.

RESULTS

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) LT was the most common (n=10, 38.5%) indication for apheresis; early graft dysfunction after LT (n=8, 30.7%) was the second most common. Median initial IgM and IgG anti-ABO titers for ABOi LT recipients were 1:16 (range, 1:8-1:128) and 1:48 (range, 1:8-1:2048). We performed preoperative TPE in 10 recipients (median number of sessions, 1.5; range, 1-11). Among patients with early graft dysfunction, those who underwent living donor LT had better survival (4/4; 100%) than those who underwent nonliving donor LT (0/3; 0%). Patients who underwent living donor LT first and then additional LT also survived after three TPE sessions.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic apheresis is associated with a good survival rate and is essential for liver support in patients with early graft dysfunction after LT or posthepatectomy liver failure and during preparation for ABOi LT.

Longitudinal Analysis of the Intestinal Microbiota in Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence suggests that the intestinal microbiota plays an important role in liver diseases. However, the dynamics of the intestinal microbiota during liver transplantation (LT) and its potential role in clinical course remain unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed the intestinal microbiota of 38 patients who underwent LT in Kyoto University Hospital. We characterized the microbial compositions of fecal specimens from LT patients using a metagenomics approach by an Illumina MiSeq platform. We analyzed the diversity of microbiota sequentially from pretransplantation until 2 months after LT and also compared the microbiota during an episode of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and bloodstream infections (BSI) to the microbial composition of time-matched fecal specimens obtained from patients who did not experience ACR or BSI, respectively.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty fecal specimens were analyzed. Dynamic changes were observed in the microbial composition of LT recipients during the perioperative period. Over the course of LT, the mean diversity index decreased during the first 3 weeks after LT and gradually increased during our observation period. The loss of intestinal microbiota diversity was associated with high Child-Pugh scores, high model for end-stage liver disease scores, ACR, and BSI. At the family level, Bacteroides, Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococcaceae, and Bifidobacteriaceae were increased whereas Enterococcaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Clostridiaceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Peptostreptococcaceae were decreased in ACR patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The microbiota of LT patients was associated with the severity of liver diseases and the presence of ACR and BSI. These results lay the groundwork for more comprehensive investigations of microbiota characteristics to identify diagnostic markers for transplant health and to guide intervention strategies to improve transplant outcomes.

Single-Center Experience of ABO-Incompatible Living-Donor Liver Transplantation With a New Simplified Intravenous Immunoglobulin Protocol: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

The outcomes of patients who undergo ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have markedly improved as strategies have become more innovative and advanced. Here, we describe 25 cases of ABO-I LDLT with a simplified protocol and compare the outcomes to those of ABO-compatible LDLT. We analyzed outcomes via a retrospective review of 182 adult LDLT cases including 25 ABO-I LDLTs from January 2011 to December 2014. Propensity scoring was used to compare the groups. The desensitization protocol included plasma exchange, rituximab, and intravenous immunoglobulin without local infusion therapy. The triple immunosuppression protocol consisted of tacrolimus and steroids with mycophenolate mofetil; a splenectomy was not routinely performed. The median age of recipients was 51 years (range, 35-66 years), and the median mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15 (range, 7-37). The initial ranges of isoagglutinin IgM and IgG titers were 1:1 to 1:256 and 1:4 to 1:2048, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient demographics or perioperative variables between the groups. Although significant rebound elevation in anti-ABO antibody during the postoperative period was observed in 3 cases, neither C4d staining nor clinical signs of antibody-mediated rejection was apparent in these cases. No diffuse intrahepatic biliary stricture was encountered in any ABO-I LDLT patient within a mean follow-up of 22.6 ± 17.2 months. Moreover, no significant difference in overall or graft survival was observed between the groups. ABO-I LDLT can be performed safely under this new simplified protocol and may be proposed when ABO-compatible donors are unavailable.

Comparison of acute kidney injury between ABO-compatible and ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation: A propensity matching analysis

The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has significantly decreased the prevalence of antibody-mediated rejection of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, little is known about acute kidney injury (AKI) following ABOi LDLT. The aim of this study was to identify the incidence of AKI in ABOi LDLT and compare it with that of ABO-compatible (ABOc) LDLT. We retrospectively collected and analyzed the data of 1617 patients who underwent liver transplant surgery from November 2008 to December 2014. Risk factors for AKI were investigated using multivariate regression analysis. In 271 ABOi LDLTs, AKI occurred in 184 (67.9%) according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. After propensity score matching, the incidence of AKI was significantly higher after ABOi LDLT than after ABOc LDLT (67.0% versus 48.2%; P < 0.001). Furthermore, the intensive care unit stay (P = 0.01) was significantly prolonged, but there were no significant differences in mortality (P = 0.74), graft failure (P = 0.32), and postoperative dialysis (P = 0.74) between the 2 groups. Hemoglobin level and operation time were independent risk factors for AKI following ABOi LDLT. In conclusion, the incidence of AKI is higher in ABOi LDLT than ABOc LDLT. However, the impact of AKI on postoperative outcomes was not marked in our study. Therefore, ABOi LDLT in selected patients is promising with apparent good graft and survival outcomes. Liver Transplantation 22 1656-1665 2016 AASLD.

2016 Comprehensive Update of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology: Introduction of Antibody-Mediated Rejection

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology reviewed and discussed literature evidence regarding antibody-mediated liver allograft rejection at the 11th (Paris, France, June 5-10, 2011), 12th (Comandatuba, Brazil, August 19-23, 2013), and 13th (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 5-10, 2015) meetings of the Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology. Discussion continued online. The primary goal was to introduce guidelines and consensus criteria for the diagnosis of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and provide a comprehensive update of all Banff Schema recommendations. Included are new recommendations for complement component 4d tissue staining and interpretation, staging liver allograft fibrosis, and findings related to immunosuppression minimization. In an effort to create a single reference document, previous unchanged criteria are also included.

Current techniques for AB0-incompatible living donor liver transplantation

For a long time, it was considered medical malpractice to neglect the blood group system during transplantation. Because there are far more patients waiting for organs than organs available, a variety of attempts have been made to transplant AB0-incompatible (AB0i) grafts. Improvements in AB0i graft survival rates have been achieved with immunosuppression regimens and plasma treatment procedures. Nevertheless, some grafts are rejected early after AB0i living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to antibody mediated rejection or later biliary complications that affect the quality of life. Therefore, the AB0i LDLT is an option only for emergency situations, and it requires careful planning. This review compares the treatment possibilities and their effect on the patients’ graft outcome from 2010 to the present. We compared 11 transplant center regimens and their outcomes. The best improvement, next to plasma treatment procedures, has been reached with the prophylactic use of rituximab more than one week before AB0i LDLT. Unfortunately, no standardized treatment protocols are available. Each center treats its patients with its own scheme. Nevertheless, the transplant results are homogeneous. Due to refined treatment strategies, AB0i LDLT is a feasible option today and almost free of severe complications.

Bundled strategies against infection after liver transplantation: Lessons from multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Infection is a life-threatening complication after liver transplantation (LT). A recent outbreak of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa triggered changes in our infection control measures. This study investigated the usefulness of our bundled interventions against postoperative infection after LT. This before-and-after analysis enrolled 130 patients who underwent living donor or deceased donor LT between January 2011 and October 2014. We initiated 3 measures after January 2013: (1) we required LT candidates to be able to walk independently; (2) we increased the hand hygiene compliance rate and contact precautions; and (3) we introduced procalcitonin (PCT) measurement for a more precise determination of empirical antimicrobial treatment. We compared factors affecting the emergence of drug-resistant microorganisms, such as the duration of antimicrobial and carbapenem therapy and hospital stay, and outcomes such as bacteremia and death from infection between before (n = 77) and after (n = 53) the LT suspension period. The utility of PCT measurement was also evaluated. Patients' backgrounds were not significantly different before and after the protocol revision. Incidence of bacteremia (44% versus 25%; P = 0.02), detection rate of multiple bacteria (18% versus 4%; P = 0.01), and deaths from infections (12% versus 2%; P =  0.04) significantly decreased after the protocol revision. Duration of antibiotic (42.3 versus 25.1 days; P =  0.002) and carbapenem administration (15.1 versus 5.2 days; P < 0.001) and the length of postoperative hospital stay (85.4 versus 63.5 days; P =  0.048) also decreased after the protocol revision. PCT mean values were significantly higher in the bacteremia group (10.10 ng/mL), compared with the uneventful group (0.65 ng/mL; P =  0.002) and rejection group (2.30 ng/mL; P =  0.02). One-year overall survival after LT significantly increased in the latter period (71% versus 94%; P =  0.001). In conclusion, the bundled interventions were useful in preventing infections and lengthening overall survival after LT.

Liver transplantation with deceased ABO-incompatible donors is life-saving but associated with increased risk of rejection and post-transplant complications

ABO-incompatible (ABOi) liver transplantation (LT) with deceased donor organs is performed occasionally when no ABO-compatible (ABOc) graft is available. From 1996 to 2011, 61 ABOi LTs were performed in Oslo and Gothenburg. Median patient age was 51 years (range 13-75); 33 patients were transplanted on urgent indications, 13 had malignancy-related indications, and eight received ABOi grafts for urgent retransplantations. Median donor age was 55 years (range 10-86). Forty-four patients received standard triple immunosuppression with steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil, and forty-four patients received induction with IL-2 antagonist or anti-CD20 antibody. Median follow-up time was 29 months (range 0-200). The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient survival (PS) and graft survival (GS) were 85/71%, 79/57%, 75/55%, and 59/51%, respectively, compared to 90/87%, 84/79%, 79/73%, and 65/60% for all other LT recipients in the same period. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year GS for A2 grafts were 81%, 67%, 62%, and 57%, respectively. In conclusion, ABOi LT performed with non-A2 grafts is associated with inferior graft survival and increased risk of rejection, vascular and biliary complications. ABOi LT with A2 grafts is associated with acceptable graft survival and can be used safely in urgent cases.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Children: Surgical and Immunological Results in 250 Recipients at Université Catholique de Louvain

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcome of pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) regarding portal vein (PV) reconstruction, ABO compatibility, and impact of maternal donation on graft acceptance.

BACKGROUND

LDLT and ABO-mismatched transplantation constitute feasible options to alleviate organ shortage in children. Vascular complications of portal hypoplasia in biliary atresia (BA) and acute rejection (AR) are still major concerns in this field.

METHODS

Data from 250 pediatric LDLT recipients, performed at Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc between July 1993 and June 2012, were collected retrospectively. Results were analyzed according to ABO matching and PV complications. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to study the impact of immunosuppression, sex matching, and maternal donation on AR rate.

RESULTS

Overall, the 10-year patient survival rate was 93.2%. Neither patient or graft loss nor vascular rejection, nor hemolysis, was encountered in the ABO nonidentical patients (n = 58), provided pretransplant levels of relevant isoagglutinins were below 1/16. In BA recipients, the rate of PV complications was lower after portoplasty (4.6%) than after truncal PV anastomosis (9.8%) and to jump graft interposition (26.9%; P = 0.027). In parental donation, maternal grafts were associated with higher 1-year AR-free survival (55.2%) than paternal grafts (39.8%; P = 0.041), but only in BA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

LDLT, including ABO-mismatched transplantation, constitutes a safe and efficient therapy for liver failure in children. In BA patients with PV hypoplasia, portoplasty seems to constitute the best technique for PV reconstruction. Maternal donation might be a protective factor for AR.

Pediatric Liver Transplantation Across the ABO Blood Group Barrier: Is It an Obstacle in the Modern Era?

BACKGROUND

The initial experience with ABO incompatible (ABOi) orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTs) was dismal. In the current study, we investigated whether ABOi pediatric OLTs could achieve acceptable patient outcomes. The option for ABOi transplantation is vital because critically ill children have limited access to donor liver allografts.

STUDY DESIGN

Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox analysis was performed on data collected from 13,179 pediatric OLT recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database, including 540 ABOi recipients. We also analyzed 18 pediatric recipients of ABOi OLTs at Texas Children's Hospital. Recipients were divided into 2 groups: transplanted between 1987 to 2002 (remote era) and 2002 to 2013 (modern era).

RESULTS

Analysis revealed 4 main points. First, there was a significant (p < 0.01) improvement in ABOi OLT survival in the modern era. Second, threshold analysis revealed superior outcomes (p < 0.01) for OLT recipients younger than 2 years of age. Third, survival outcomes for ABOi and ABO-identical OLTs were the same for recipients younger than 2 years: ABOi was 91.8% (1 year) and 88.4% (5 year), and ABO identical was 91.5% (1 year) and 86.7% (5 year) (p = 0.94). Lastly, we found identical OLT results when analyzing our own institutional experience. To date, there has been a 92.9% survival rate in the modern era compared with 75% in the remote era. All recipients younger than 2 years (n = 9) are still alive, compared with 78% of those older than 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis revealed a significant improvement in the survival of ABOi liver transplant recipients in the modern era. Importantly, ABOi liver transplantation can be performed in recipients younger than 2 years of age with equivalent outcomes compared with ABO-identical recipients.

ABO-Incompatible Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Under the Desensitization Protocol With Rituximab

ABO incompatibility is no longer considered a contraindication for adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) due to various strategies to overcome the ABO blood group barrier. We report the largest single-center experience of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) ALDLT in 235 adult patients. The desensitization protocol included a single dose of rituximab and total plasma exchange. In addition, local graft infusion therapy, cyclophosphamide, or splenectomy was used for a certain time period, but these treatments were eventually discontinued due to adverse events. There were three cases (1.3%) of in-hospital mortality. The cumulative 3-year graft and patient survival rates were 89.2% and 92.3%, respectively, and were comparable to those of the ABO-compatible group (n = 1301). Despite promising survival outcomes, 17 patients (7.2%) experienced antibody-mediated rejection that manifested as diffuse intrahepatic biliary stricture; six cases required retransplantation, and three patients died. ABOi ALDLT is a feasible method for expanding a living liver donor pool, but the efficacy of the desensitization protocol in targeting B cell immunity should be optimized.

Donor- and recipient-derived immunity in ABO incompatible living-related liver transplantation

This report describes how donor- and recipient-derived immunity was influenced by immunosuppressive treatment of ABO incompatibility (rituximab and immunoadsorption/plasmaphereses) in the long-term. We present an 8-year course of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunity, isohemagglutinins and B cell numbers. Whereas cellular HBV immunity was transferred from the HBV vaccinated donor (blood group A1) to the HBV naïve recipient (blood group 0), humoral HBV specific immune transfer was lacking. Starting at month 17 after transplantation, the recipient was vaccinated six times against HBV. Anti-HBs did not appear until the sixth vaccination at month 44. Immunoadsorption prior to transplantation reduced anti-A1 IgG titers from 256 to 2. Titers after transplantation remained low (⩽64). B cell numbers were below standard values up to month 26, then normalized and exceeded normal values from year 7 to 8 post transplantation. In conclusion, donor-derived B cell immunity was lost but recipient-derived immunity persisted after ABO incompatible transplantation.

The impact of rituximab in ABO-incompatible pediatric living donor liver transplantation: the experience of a single center

Previous studies have demonstrated the safety of ABO-incompatible pediatric LDLT using preoperative plasmapheresis and rituximab; however, no reports have described the timing and dosage of rituximab administration for pediatric LDLT. This study aimed to describe a safe and effective dosage and timing of rituximab for patients undergoing pediatric ABO-incompatible LDLT based on the experience of our single center. A total of 192 LDLTs in 187 patients were examined. These cases included 29 ABO-incompatible LDLTs in 28 patients. Rituximab was used beginning in January 2004 in recipients older than two yr of age (first period: 375 mg/m(2) in two cases; second period: 50 mg/m(2) in two cases; and 200 mg/m(2) in eight cases). Two patients who received 375 mg/m(2) rituximab died of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and hemophagocytic syndrome. One patient who received 50 mg/m(2) rituximab required retransplantation as a consequence of antibody-mediated complications. All eight patients administered 200 mg/m(2) survived, and the mean CD20(+) lymphocyte count was 0.1% at the time of LDLT. In the preoperative management of patients undergoing pediatric ABO-incompatible LDLT, the administration of 200 mg/m(2) rituximab three wk prior to LDLT was safe and effective.

Fourteen successful consecutive cases of ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation: new simplified intravenous immunoglobulin protocol without local infusion therapy

Since various innovative strategies including local infusion therapy and rituximab have been introduced, the survivals and outcomes of recipients in ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have remarkably improved. Thus, ABO-I LDLT can be a feasible therapeutic option for the patient with end-stage liver disease if an ABO-compatible donor is not available. Although most ABO-I protocols are based on rituximab, plasma exchange, and local infusion therapy, treatment strategies have been changing according to a center's preference or their results. Nonetheless, the consensus of the ABO-I LDLT protocol remains undetermined. Herein, we present our experience with new simple ABO-I LDLT protocol and the excellent results for 14 patients from January 2011 to May 2013. All patients were administrated a single dose of rituximab over 7 days before transplantation followed by plasma exchange to lower anti-ABO antibody titer ≤32. The basic immunosuppression protocol consisted of tacrolimus and steroids with mycophenolate mofetil starting 3 days before transplantation. Splenectomy was not performed routinely and local infusion therapy was not applied at the postoperative period. Instead, the patients received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) after LDLT on days 1, 3, and 5. Neither antibody-mediated rejection nor biliary stricture were encountered in the patients, with a mean follow-up of 16.27 ± 9.4 months. This new simplified ABO-I LDLT protocol seems to prevent antibody-mediated rejection and could be considered as the safe and effective modality to overcome the ABO blood-type barrier in LDLT.