Lymph node metastasis from cancer of the esophagogastric junction, and determination of the appropriate nodal dissection. Surg Today. 2012;42:351-358. [PMID: 22245924 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-011-0114-4]

Transthoracic single-port-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic transhiatal approach for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach for patients with Siewert type II AEG remains controversial. Several studies have described a new laparoscopic radical resection approach of Siewert type II AEG through the left diaphragm. However, the technical safety and feasibility of the new surgical approach compared with the transhiatal approach have not yet been tested.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed patients with AEG who underwent TSLG and LTH operations in the Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine between January 2017 and April 2021. Histologically confirmed AEG and D2 lymphadenectomy with curative R0 patients were included, and patients with Siewert I/III AEG or distant metastasis were excluded. Blood loss, the amount of harvested lymph node, and complications related to surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients with Siewert type II AEG were analyzed, 44 in the TSLG group and 55 in the LTH group. There was no difference in clinicopathological features between the two groups. The more harvested lymph node (23.33 ± 11.41 vs. 32.18 ± 12.85, p < 0.01), lower mediastinal lymph node (1.07 ± 2.08 vs. 3.25 ± 3.31, p < 0.01), and longer proximal margin length (3.08 ± 1.19 vs. 4.47 ± 0.95 cm, p < 0.01) were observed in the TSLG group. The rate of cure (R0 gastrectomy) in the TSLG group was higher than that in the LTH group (100% vs. 89.09%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The TSLG approach is associated with improved surgical views, simplified lymphatic dissection in the inferior mediastinum, and more reliable margins. TSLG surgery may be an effective addition to LTH surgery, particularly when lower mediastinal lymph node metastases are suspected.

A shorter distal resection margin is a surrogate marker of nodal metastasis and poor prognosis in distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although a 3-5 cm surgical margin distance is recommended for advanced gastric cancer (GC) in Japanese guidelines, little is known about the clinical effects of the surgical margin, especially the distal resection margin (DM). This study aims to clarify the clinical significance of DM in GC.

METHODS

A total of 415 GC patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy between 2008 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The DM significantly stratified recurrence-free survival (P = 0.002), and a DM < 30 mm was an independent factor of a poor prognosis (P = 0.023, hazard ratio: 1.91). Lymphatic recurrence occurred significantly more frequently in the DM < 30 mm group than in the DM ≥ 30 mm group (P = 0.019, 6.9% vs. 1.9%). Regarding the station No.6 lymph node metastases in advanced GC (DM < 30 mm vs. 30 mm ≤ DM ≤ 50 mm vs. DM > 50 mm), the number (P < 0.001, 1.42 ± 1.69 vs. 1.18 ± 1.80 vs. 0.18 ± 0.64), the positive rate (P < 0.001, 59.0% vs. 46.7% vs. 11.3%) and therapeutic value index (43.3 vs. 14.5 vs. 8.0) were significantly higher in the DM < 30 mm group. By subdivision using the DM distance of 30 mm, more segmented prognostic stratifications were possible (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A DM of less than 30 mm could be a surrogate marker of poor RFS, especially increasing nodal recurrence. More intensive treatment strategies, including lymphadenectomy and chemotherapy, are needed for patients with this condition.

Comparison of LNM and survival in T1 stage esophageal cancer patients based on histological classification: A large population-based study

Limited evidence and contradictory results have been reported regarding the impact of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) classification on lymph node metastasis (LNM) and prognosis in esophageal cancer (EC). We aimed to compare 2 histology types in terms of LNM and prognosis using a comprehensive statistical analysis of a large population. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to extract patient information. Univariate and multivariate logistic or Cox regression, a multivariate competing risk model and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to explore the association between LNM or survival and the 2 histology types. Information for 4764 patients, including 1712 SCC and 3052 AC patients, was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a correlation between LNM and histology (odds ratio [OR] = 0.654, P = .037). We found that patients with AC had a better prognosis than SCC patients through both the multivariate Cox regression (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.866) and the multivariate competing risk model (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.704). However, no positive relation was found between LNM and histology type (P = .844) based on propensity score matching (PSM), and the prognosis remained poorer for the patients with SCC (P < .001). T1-stage EC with a histology of SCC may have a comparable risk of LNM as the AC type, while SCC has a poorer prognosis than the AC type.

Establishment of prognostic models for adenocarcinoma of oesophagogastric junction patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Multimodal therapies based on surgical resection have been recommended for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction (AEG). We aimed to evaluate prognostic factors in AEG patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and to build predictive models.

METHODS

T3 - T4N + M0 AEG patients with resectable Siewert type II/III tumours were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation, followed by radical surgery or systemic therapy according to clinical response. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method; multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards method was also conducted. The Harrell concordance index (C-index) was used to test the prognostic value of models involving prognostic factors, and consistency between actual and predicted survival rates was evaluated by calibration curves.

RESULTS

From February 2009 to February 2018, 79 patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; 60 patients of them underwent radical surgery. The R0 resection rate was 98.3%, and 46.7% of patients achieved a major pathologic response (MPR), namely, a residual tumour issue less than 10%. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 63%, and the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 48%. The incidence of grade 3 complications was 21.5%, and no grade 4 complications were reported. According to the results of univariate and multivariate analyses, we included the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), eosinophilic granulocyte (EOS) and postoperative pathologic stage in nomogram analysis to establish prediction models for OS and PFS; the C-index of each model was 0.814 and 0.722, respectively. Both the C-index and calibration curves generated to validate consistency between the actual and predicted survival indicated that the models were well calibrated and of good predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

AEG patients achieved favourable downstaging and pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, with acceptable adverse effects. Inflammation-based and nutrition-related factors and postoperative pathologic stage had a significant influence on OS and PFS, and the predictive value was verified through prognostic models.

The Value of Paratracheal Lymphadenectomy in Esophagectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background

The role of upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy for distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas remains a matter of debate. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of evidence on the incidence of nodal metastases in the upper mediastinum following transthoracic esophagectomy for distal esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Methods

A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases up to November 2020 to include studies on patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy for distal esophageal and/or GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint was the incidence of metastatic nodes in the upper mediastinum based on pathological examination. Secondary endpoints were the definition of upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy rate and survival.

Results

A total of 17 studies were included and the sample sizes ranged from 10-634 patients. Overall, the median incidence of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases was 10.0% (IQR 4.7-16.7). The incidences of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases were 8.3% in the 7 studies that included patients undergoing primary resection (IQR 2.0-16.6), 4,4% in the 1 study that provided neoadjuvant therapy to the full cohort, and 10.6% in the 9 studies that included patients undergoing esophagectomy either with or without neoadjuvant therapy (IQR 8.9-15.8%). Data on survival and RLN palsy rates were scarce and inconclusive.

Conclusions

The incidence of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases in distal esophageal adenocarcinoma is up to 10%. Morbidity should be weighed against potential impact on survival.

Optimal surgery for esophagogastric junctional cancer

Esophagogastric junctional cancer is classified into three categories according to the Siewert classification, which reflects the epidemiological and biological characteristics. Therapeutic strategies have been evaluated according to the three Siewert types. There is a consensus that types I and III should be treated as esophageal cancer and gastric cancer, respectively. On the other hand, type II is often described as true cardiac cancer, which has different clinicopathological features from the other types. Thus, there is no consensus on the surgical management of type II esophagogastric junctional cancer. The optimal surgical management should focus on the principles of cancer surgery, which take into consideration oncological curability, including an appropriate resection margin, adequate lymphadenectomy, and minimization of postoperative complications. In this review, we evaluate the current relevant literature and evidence, on the surgical treatment of esophagogastric junctional cancer, focusing on type II. Esophagectomy with a thoracic approach has the advantage of ensuring a sufficient proximal resection margin and adequate mediastinal lymphadenectomy. However, the oncological benefit is offset by a high incidence of postoperative complications. Minimally invasive esophagectomy could be a possible solution to reduce complications and improve long-term outcomes. Further development of surgical treatments for Siewert type II is required to improve the outcomes. Furthermore, the surgical team should have expertise in both gastric cancer and esophageal cancer treatment, or patients should be managed with close collaboration between thoracic surgeons and gastric cancer surgeons.

Can we predict mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis in esophagogastric junction cancer? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to define clinical indicator that predicts mediastinal lymph nodes metastasis (MLNM) in patients with Esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) to select patient population requiring esophagectomy.

METHODS

A systematic and electronic search of several electronic databases was performed up to August 2020. Studies containing information on risk factors for MLNM in patients diagnosed with EJGC and who underwent curative surgery were included.

RESULTS

Two predictors, including undifferentiated type (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.07-3.10, p = 0.03) and esophageal invasion length (EIL) (OR = 10.95, 95% CI = 6.37-18.82, p < 0.00001) were identified as significant predictors for the risk of MLNM.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the associations of these clinicopathological features with MLNM can be useful in determining operative strategy for EGJC.

Current surgical treatment of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

The incidence of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has shown an upward trend over the past several decades worldwide. In this article, we review previous studies and aimed to provide an update on the factors related to the surgical treatment of EGJ adenocarcinoma. The Siewert classification has implications for lymph node spread and is the most commonly used classification. Different types of EGJ cancer have different incidences of mediastinal and abdominal lymph node metastases, and different surgical approaches have unique advantages and disadvantages. Minimally invasive surgeries have been increasingly applied in clinical practice and show comparable oncologic outcomes. Endoscopic resection may be a good therapy for early EGJ cancer. Additionally, there is still a great need for well-designed, large RCTs to forward our knowledge on the surgical treatment of EGJ cancer.

The optimal extent of lymph node dissection in gastroesophageal junctional cancer: retrospective case control study

BACKGROUND

Recently, the incidence of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer has been increasing in Eastern countries. Mediastinal lymph node (MLN) metastasis rates among patients with GEJ cancer are reported to be 5-25%. However, survival benefits associated with MLN dissection in GEJ cancer has been a controversial issue, especially in Eastern countries, due to its rarity and potential morbidity.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 290 patients who underwent surgery for GEJ cancer at the National Cancer Center in Korea from June 2001 to December 2015. Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes were compared between patients without MLN dissection (Group A) and patients with MLN dissection (Group B). Prognostic factors associated with the survival rate were identified in a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine (10%) patients underwent MLN dissection (Group B). Three of 29 patients (10.3%) showed a metastatic MLN in Group B. For abdominal LNs, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 79.5% in Group A and 33.9% in Group B (P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed that abdominal LN dissection, pT category, and pN category were statistically significant prognostic factors. LNs were the most common site for recurrence in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal LN dissection and pathologic stage are the important prognostic factors for type II and III GEJ cancer rather than mediastinal lymph node dissection.

Optimal Extent of Transhiatal Gastrectomy and Lymphadenectomy for the Stomach-Predominant Adenocarcinoma of Esophagogastric Junction: Retrospective Single-Institution Study in China

Background: The optimal extent of gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer is controversial. Our study aimed to compare the long-term survival of transhiatal proximal gastrectomy with extended periproximal lymphadenectomy (THPG with EPL) and transhiatal total gastrectomy with complete perigastric lymphadenectomy (THTG with CPL) for patients with the stomach-predominant EGJ cancer.

Methods: Between January 2004, and August 2015, 306 patients with Siewert II tumors were divided into the THTG group (n = 148) and the THPG group (n = 158). Their long-term survival was compared according to Nishi's classification. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in the distribution of age, gender, tumor size or Nishi's type (P > 0.05). However, a significant difference was observed in terms of pathological tumor stage (P < 0.05). The 5-year overall survival rates were 62.0% in the THPG group and 59.5% in the THTG group. The hazard ratio for death was 0.455 (95% CI, 0.337 to 0.613; log-rank P < 0.001). Type GE/E = G showed a worse prognosis compared with Type G (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis stratified by Nishi's classification, Stage IA-IIB and IIIA, and tumor size ≤ 30 mm indicated significant survival advantages for the THPG group (P < 0.05). However, this analysis failed to show a survival benefit in Stage IIIB (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Nishi's classification is an effective method to clarify the subdivision of Siewert II tumors with a diameter ≤ 40 mm above or below the EGJ. THPG with EPL is an optimal procedure for the patients with the stomach-predominant EGJ tumors ≤30 mm in diameter and in Stage IA-IIIA. For more advanced and larger EGJ tumors, further studies are required to confirm the necessity of THTG with CPL.

Low risk of lymph node metastasis in 495 early gastric cardiac carcinomas: a multicenter clinicopathologic study of 2101 radical gastrectomies for early gastric carcinoma

Clinical decision-making on endoscopic vs. surgical resection of early gastric cardiac carcinoma remains challenging because of uncertainty on risk of lymph node metastasis. The aim of this multicenter study was to investigate risk factors of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cardiac carcinoma. Guided with the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria, we studied 2101 radical resections of early gastric carcinoma for risk factors associated with lymph node metastasis, including tumor location, gross pattern, size, histology type, differentiation, invasion depth, lymphovascular, and perineural invasion. We found that the risk of lymph node metastasis was significantly lower in early gastric cardiac carcinomas (6.7%, 33/495), compared with early gastric non-cardiac carcinomas (17.1%, 275/1606) (p < 0.0001). In early gastric cardiac carcinoma, no lymph node metastasis was identified in intramucosal carcinoma (0/193) and uncommon types of carcinomas (0/24), irrespective of the gross pattern, size, histologic type, differentiation, and invasion depth. Ulceration, size > 3 cm, and submucosal invasion were not significant independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis. In 33 early gastric cardiac carcinomas with lymph node metastasis, either lymphovascular invasion or poor differentiation was present in 16 (48.5%) cases and together in six cases. By multivariate analysis, independent risk factors of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cardiac carcinoma included lymphovascular invasion (Odds Ratio (OR): 7.6, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.8-20.2) (p < 0.0001) and poor differentiation (OR: 6.0, 95% CI: 1.4-25.9) (p < 0.05). In conclusion, lymph node metastasis was not identified in early gastric cardiac intramucosal carcinoma and uncommon types of carcinoma. The risk of lymph node metastasis was also significantly lower in tumors with submucosal invasion, especially for cases without lymphovascular invasion or poor differentiation. These results lend support to the role of endoscopic therapy in the treatment of patients with early gastric cardiac carcinoma.

Surgical strategies in true adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG II): thoracoabdominal or abdominal approach?

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach for adenocarcinoma directly at the esophagogastric junction (AEG II) is still under debate. This study aims to evaluate the differences between right thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (TAE) (Ivor-Lewis operation) and transhiatal extended gastrectomy (THG) for AEG II.

METHODS

From a prospective database, 242 patients with AEG II (TAE, n = 56; THG, n = 186) were included and analyzed according to characteristics and perioperative morbidity and mortality and overall survival (chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, log-rank, Cox regression).

RESULTS

Groups were comparable at baseline with exception of age. Patients older than 70 years were more frequently resected by THG (p = 0.003). No differences in perioperative morbidity (p = 0.197) and mortality (p = 0.711) were observed, including anastomotic leakages (p = 0.625) and pulmonary complications (p = 0.494). There was no significant difference in R0 resection (p = 0.719) and number of resected lymph nodes (p = 0.202). Overall median survival was 38.4 months. Survival after TAE was significantly longer than after THG (median OS not reached versus 33.6 months, p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed pN-category (p < 0.001) and type of surgery (p = 0.017) as independent prognostic factors. The type of surgery was confirmed as prognostic factor in locally advanced AEG II (cT 3/4 or cN1), but not in cT1/2 and cN0 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our single-center experience suggests that patients with (locally advanced) AEG II tumors may benefit from TAE compared to THG. For further evaluation, a randomized trial would be necessary.

The optimal lymph node dissection in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to refine the optimal lymph node dissection in Western patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

BACKGROUND

Lymphadenectomy is essential in addition to surgery for AEG. Asian studies continually present superior survival rates using a more extended lymphadenectomy compared with results reproduced in the West. Thus, the optimal extend of the lymphadenectomy remains unclear in Western patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort was conducted of patients with AEG from January 1st, 2003 to December 31st, 2011. All patients undergoing curatively intended surgery was included. Two types of resections were constructed; Res1 included patients where only the loco regional lymph nodes were removed (station 1-4, 7 and 9) and Res2 included the additional removal of the more distant stations 8 and/or 11.

RESULTS

We identified 510 patients with AEG. The highest frequency of lymph node metastases was seen in the loco regional stations 1-3, 7 and 9, ranging from 34% to 41.4%. There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups; the median survival rate for Res1 was 30.4 months compared to 24.1 months for Res2 (p = 0.157). Furthermore, the extend of lymph node dissection seemed to have no effect on survival (HR = 1.061, 95%CI 0.84-1.33).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in survival between the extended and the less extended lymphadenectomy was found. The presence of metastases in distant lymph nodes indicates poor survival and may represent disseminated disease. We do not find evidence that supports an extended lymph node dissection in Western patients.

Appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

AIM

To investigate the appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagogastric junction (ECJ).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 52 patients with SCC of the ECJ who underwent extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy. We assessed potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in the upper/middle mediastinum by conducting univariate and multivariate analyses, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the therapeutic value index of each nodal basin dissection was calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis at the basin and the 5-year overall survival rate of patients with metastasis at that basin.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (38%) had mediastinal LNM; 13 (25%) had metastasis in the upper/middle mediastinum, and 13 (25%) had metastasis in the lower mediastinum. Tumor length (P = 0.03) and pathological nodal status (P = 0.01) were independent risk factors for upper/middle mediastinal LNM. The optimal ROC cutoff value of tumor length was 54 mm. The 5-year overall survival rate of the patients with LNM in the upper/middle mediastinum was 46%. The therapeutic value index of upper/middle mediastinal lymphadenectomy was 11.6, which was inferior to that of perigastric lymphadenectomy at 17.3, but superior to that of lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy at 5.8.

CONCLUSION

An upper/middle mediastinal lymphadenectomy may be required for patients with tumors that are ≥54 mm long, and in those with suspected LNM.

Siewert III adenocarcinoma: treatment update

Siewert III cancer, although representing around 40% of EGJ cancers and being the EGJ cancer with worst prognosis, does not have a homogenous treatment, has few dedicated studies, and is often not considered in study protocols. Although staged as an esophageal cancer by the TNM 7th ed., it is considered a gastric cancer by new TNM 8th ed. Our aim was to consolidate the current literature on the indications and treatment options for Siewert III adenocarcinoma. A review of the literature was performed to better delineate treatment indications (according to stage, surgical margins, type of lymphatic spread and lymphadenectomy) and treatment strategy. The treatment approach is strictly dependent on cancer site and nodal diffusion. T1m cancers have insignificant risk of nodal metastases and can be safely treated with endoscopic resections. The risk of nodal metastases increases markedly starting from T1sm cancers and requires surgery with lymphadenectomy. The site of this type of cancer and the nodal diffusion require a total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy, with 5 cm of clear proximal and distal margins and a D2 abdominal and inferior mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Multimodal treatments are indicated in all locally advanced and node positive cancers. Siewert III cancers are gastric cancers with some peculiarities and require dedicated studies and deserve more consideration in the current literature, especially because their treatment is particularly challenging.

What's the Best Way to Treat GE Junction Tumors? Approach Like Gastric Cancer

The debate as to the optimal classification, staging, and treatment of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors wages on, and one must acknowledge that there is no "one-size-fits-all" approach. However, in this review we are charged with defending the position that all GEJ tumors are best treated like gastric cancer. We submit that, as stated, this is not a defensible position and that a clear definition of terms is warranted. Given the rarity of squamous cell carcinoma and the dramatic rise in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the GEJ in the West, we define GEJ "tumors" to mean adenocarcinomas of the GEJ. Furthermore, on the basis of their location, pathogenesis, and biologic behavior, we submit that few would argue with the contention that Siewert type I GEJ tumors are best treated like distal esophageal cancer and that Siewert type III GEJ tumors are best treated like gastric cancer. The real debate concerns the management of Siewert type II GEJ tumors, which arise immediately at the esophagogastric junction. Thus, for the purposes of this review, we have taken the liberty of redefining the question as what's the best way to treat adenocarcinomas of the true GEJ (i.e., Siewert type II tumors), and we submit that these tumors are in fact best treated like gastric cancer. This approach ensures that patients receive those therapies needed for the locoregional and systemic control of their disease together with a surgical procedure that optimizes complete tumor and regional lymph node resection while limiting morbidity.

The Role of No. 10 Lymphadenectomy for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer Patients Without Metastasis to No. 4sa and No. 4sb Lymph Nodes

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus in the impact of No. 10 lymph node dissection (LND) for advanced proximal gastric cancer (APGC) and the status of negative No. 4sa and No. 4sb lymph nodes (No. 4s LNs) is reportedly associated with no metastasis to No. 10 LN. We aimed to evaluate the role of No. 10 LND in APGC patients with negative No. 4s LNs and the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative pathologic examination.

METHODS

We analyzed data on 727 patients with APGC who had undergone D2 lymphadenectomy with No. 10 LND (n = 380) or without No. 10 LND (n = 347) between January 2005 and December 2010. Additionally, from January to July 2014, we prospectively enrolled 48 patients with APGC and examined their No. 4s LNs intraoperatively.

RESULTS

The negative predictive efficacy of No. 4s LN status for no metastasis to No. 10 LN was 98.09 %. Operation time, blood loss, time to first solid diet, hospital stay, and postoperative complication rate differed significantly between patients with negative No. 4s LNs who underwent No. 10 LND (n = 260) and those who did not undergo No. 10 LND (n = 243). Differences between the two groups in 5-year overall and disease-free survival were not statistically significant. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of intraoperative pathological examination of LNs were 93.42, 96.56, and 95.86 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The No. 10 lymphadenectomy may not be recommended in patients with APGC who are found by intraoperative pathological examination to have negative No. 4s LNs.

Should Splenic Hilar Lymph Nodes be Dissected for Siewert Type II and III Esophagogastric Junction Carcinoma Based on Tumor Diameter?: A Retrospective Database Analysis

The aim of the study is to identify the value of a spleen-preserving No. 10 lymphadenectomy (SPL) for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).From January 2007 to June 2014, 694 patients undergoing radical total gastrectomy for Siewert type II/III AEG were analyzed. Oncologic outcomes were compared between SPL and no SPL (No. 10D+ and No. 10D-) groups.The incidence of No. 10 lymph node metastasis (LNM) was 12.3%. No significant differences in the incidence of No. 10 LNM were found between Siewert type II AEG with tumor diameters of <4 cm and ≥4 cm (P = 0.071). However, Siewert type III AEG with a tumor diameter ≥4 cm showed a significantly higher frequency of No. 10 LNM compared with a tumor diameter <4 cm (P < 0.001). The No. 10D+ group had superior 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates compared with the No. 10D- group (P = 0.030 and P = 0.005, respectively). For patients with Siewert type II and type III AEG with a tumor diameter <4 cm, the 3-year OS and DFS rates were similar between the 2 groups. However, the No. 10D+ group had better 3-year OS (66.6% vs 51.1%, P = 0.019) and DFS (63.2% vs 45.9%, P = 0.007) rates for Siewert type III AEG with a tumor diameter ≥4 cm. A multivariate Cox regression showed that SPL was an independent prognostic factor in Siewert type III AEG with a tumor diameter ≥4 cm.SPL may improve the prognosis of Siewert type III AEG with a tumor diameter ≥4 cm, whereas SPL may be omitted without decreasing survival in patients with Siewert type II or type III AEG with a tumor diameter <4 cm.

Theoretical therapeutic impact of lymph node dissection on adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUNDS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the theoretical therapeutic impact of dissecting each lymph node station for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

METHODS

This multicenter study included 431 junctional cancer patients (381 adenocarcinomas and 50 squamous cell carcinomas) who fulfilled the following criteria: (1) the center of the tumor was located between 1 cm above and 2 cm below the esophagogastric junction, and (2) the tumor invaded the junction. The theoretical therapeutic impact of dissecting each lymph node station was evaluated based on the therapeutic value index calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis to each station and the 5-year survival rate of patients with metastasis to that station.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rates (95% confidence interval) were 60.4% (55.1-65.7) in the adenocarcinoma cases and 52.3% (35.6-69.0) in the squamous cell carcinoma cases. The nodal stations showing the first to fifth highest index were the paracardial and lesser curvature nodes (nos. 1, 2 and 3), nodes at the root of the left gastric artery (no. 7) and lower mediastinal lymph nodes, regardless of the histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Nodal dissection achieved by proximal gastrectomy and lower esophagectomy should be the minimal requirement for junctional cancer regardless of the histology, considering the therapeutic value indices for the relevant lymph node stations.

Distribution of involved abdominal lymph nodes is correlated with the distance from the esophagogastric junction to the distal end of the tumor in Siewert type II tumors

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical approach for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has not yet been agreed. Here we investigated whether the distance from the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) to the distal end of the tumor was related to the distribution of involved abdominal lymph nodes in Siewert type II tumors.

METHODS

A total of 288 patients with pT2-4 AEG Siewert II, treated by R0 surgical resection at 7 institutions in Japan, were retrospectively investigated. The distribution of involved abdominal nodes was correlated with the distance from the EGJ to the distal end of the tumor.

RESULTS

In patients where the distance from the EGJ to the distal end of the tumor was ≤30 mm, the frequency of nodal involvement along the greater curvature or antrum was low (2.2%). In contrast, in patients where the distance was >50 mm, the incidence of this nodal involvement was 20.0%. In patients where the distance was 30-50 mm incidence was intermediate (8.0%). Multivariate analyses showed that the distance from the EGJ to the distal end of the tumor was significantly related to lymph node involvement along the greater curvature or antrum (odds ratio 3.7, 95% confidence interval 1.3-11, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

When the distance from the EGJ to the distal end of the tumor is ≤ 30 mm for Siewert II AEG, esophagectomy or proximal gastrectomy is sufficient from the point of view of abdominal lymphadenectomy. However, a total gastrectomy should be considered for abdominal lymphadenectomy when this distance is > 50 mm.

Diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for lymph node metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of hybrid positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for lymph node (LN) metastasis of esophageal cancer. We also investigated the correlation between the size of metastatic nests and the detection by PET/CT.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy with two- or three-field radical lymphadenectomy were analyzed retrospectively. We compared the diagnosis of preoperative PET/CT to the postoperative histopathological examination by each anatomical field (n = 1,231) in all 258 patients. The metastatic LNs resected from PET/CT positive fields were classified as belonging to the PET/CT-N-positive group (n = 229) and those from negative fields as belonging to the PET/CT-N-negative group (n = 352). The cross-sectional areas of metastatic nests were measured in each metastatic LN.

RESULTS

Of the 1,231 fields, 275 (22 %) were positive for metastasis, including 581 LNs from 408 regional LN stations. The sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT examined by each anatomical field were 25.8 and 97.8 %, respectively. The median area of metastatic nests was 17.7 mm2 in the PET/CT-N-positive group, and 7.7 mm2 in the PET/CT-N-negative group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant correlation was suggested between the nest size and detection by PET/CT. Because of its low sensitivity, PET/CT alone is insufficient to determine the surgical procedures, especially when considering reduction surgery.

Distribution of lymph node metastasis and clinical validity of gastric tube reconstruction in lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with gastric invasion

BACKGROUND

The distribution of lymph node (LN) metastases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with gastric invasion remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between gastric invasion and abdominal LN metastasis in patients with esophageal SCC. Furthermore, the clinical validity of gastric tube reconstruction for those with gastric invasion was investigated.

METHODS

Patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy at our institution were reviewed. Gastric invasion was evaluated with pretreatment upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and classified into 3 groups: no invasion, Gr 0; slight invasion (0-19 mm), Gr 1; and massive invasion (20 mm or longer), Gr 2. The correlations between gastric invasion, the number of abdominal LN metastases, and postoperative recurrence were investigated.

RESULTS

Of 79 patients, the distribution of pretreatment gastric invasion was Gr 0, 1, and 2 in 57, 15, and 7 patients, respectively. All patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. There was no significant difference in the number of abdominal LN metastases among groups. In survival analysis, the location of the distal end of the tumor was not a predictive factor for postoperative recurrence. Regarding patterns of recurrence, in patients with gastric invasion, there was no remarkable increase in the frequency of recurrence in the abdominal LNs or the regional LNs around the gastric tube.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment gastric invasion did not significantly influence abdominal LN metastasis and postoperative recurrence. In patients with esophageal SCC at the lower thoracic esophagus with gastric invasion, subtotal esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction might be a valid surgical procedure.

Status and prognosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with cardia cancer - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) has a poor prognosis and survival rates significantly decreases if lymph node metastasis is present. An extensive lymphadenectomy may increase chances of cure, but may also lead to further postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the optimal treatment of cardia cancer remains controversial. A systematic review of English publications dealing with adenocarcinoma of the cardia was conducted to elucidate patterns of nodal spread and prognostic implications.

METHODS

A systematic literature search based on PRISMA guidelines identifying relevant studies describing lymph node metastasis and the associated prognosis. Lymph node stations were classified according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association guidelines.

RESULTS

The highest incidence of metastasis is seen in the nearest regional lymph nodes, station no. 1-3 and additionally in no. 7, 9 and 11. Correspondingly the best survival is seen when metastasis remain in the most locoregional nodes and survival equally tends to decrease as the metastasis become more distant. Furthermore, the presence of lymph node metastasis significantly correlates to the TNM-stage. Incidences of metastasis in mediastinal lymph nodes are associated with poor survival.

CONCLUSION

The best survival rates is seen when lymph node metastasis remains locoregional and survival rates decreases when distant lymph node metastasis is present. The dissection of locoregional lymph nodes offers significantly therapeutic benefit, but larger and prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effect of dissecting distant and mediastinal lymph nodes.

Lymph node metastasis and lymphadenectomy of resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

Based on Siewert classification, adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEGs) have different behaviors of perigastric-mediastinal nodal metastasis. Siewert type I AEGs have higher incidence of mediastinal nodal metastasis than those of type II or III, especially at middle-upper mediastinum. With regard to the necessity of mediastinal lymphadenectomy, theoretically, transthoracic esophagogastrectomy with complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy is suggested for Siewert type I AEGs, while transhiatal total gastrectomy with lower mediastinal and D2 perigastric lymphadenectomy is a standard surgery for type II-III AEGs. Nevertheless, the mediastinal nodal metastasis is an independent factor of poor prognosis for any type of AEG.

The optimal extent of lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction differs between Siewert type II and Siewert type III patients

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has been increasing worldwide. We investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with Siewert type II and III AEGs and clarified the optimal intra-abdominal lymph node dissection in these patients.

METHODS

This study included 132 patients with AEG who underwent curative resection at Shizuoka Cancer Center from September 2002 to December 2012. We used the index of estimated benefit from lymph node dissection (IEBLD) to assess the efficacy of lymph node dissection of each station. The clinicopathological characteristics and IEBLDs of each station were compared between patients with Siewert type II and III AEGs.

RESULTS

We analyzed 92 patients with Siewert type II AEG and 40 patients with Siewert type III AEG. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was high in both groups (64.1 % in type II AEG and 75.0 % in type III AEG). The 5-year survival rates were similar for the patients with Siewert type II and III AEGs, at 54.0 and 53.4 %, respectively. The IEBLDs of stations located near the esophagogastric junction were generally high in both groups, while the IEBLDs of lower perigastric lymph nodes were higher in Siewert type III than in Siewert type II AEG cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The IEBLDs were similar between Siewert type II and III AEGs at all stations except for lower perigastric lymph nodes. Total gastrectomy should be selected as a standard treatment for Siewert type III AEG, whereas in Siewert type II AEG, preservation of the distal part of the stomach may be an acceptable procedure.

Thoracic lymph node involvement in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma relative to the location of the proximal end of the tumor

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to determine preoperatively whether upper/middle thoracic lymphadenectomy is necessary in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) or lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we investigated whether stratification based on the location of the proximal end of the tumor, as assessed using preoperative computed tomography (CT) images, would be useful for predicting upper/middle thoracic lymph node involvement for AEG and lower ESCC.

METHODS

A total of 142 patients with AEG and lower ESCC treated by R0-1 surgical resection via a thoracotomy was retrospectively investigated. The location of the proximal end of the tumor in comparison with the vena cava foramen (VCF) was decided by inspecting preoperative CT images and then correlated with upper/middle thoracic lymph node involvement.

RESULTS

The incidence of upper/middle thoracic lymph node involvement was low in AEG and ESCC tumors having proximal ends below the VCF (0 %, 0 of 13, and 5.9 %, 1 of 17, for AEG and ESCC, respectively). In contrast, when the tumors' proximal ends were above the VCF, patients had higher frequencies of upper/middle thoracic lymph node involvement (36.4 %, 8 of 22, and 37.8 %, 34 of 90, for AEG and ESCC, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the location of the proximal end of the tumor is an independent risk factor related to upper/middle thoracic lymph node involvement (odds ratio 14.3, 95 % confidence interval 1.76-111, p = 0.013), whereas other clinical factors (cT, cN, tumor length, and histologic types) are not.

CONCLUSIONS

This manner of stratification using preoperative CT images could be useful in deciding the extent of thoracic lymphadenectomy in both AEG and ESCC.

Tumor volume of resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction at multidetector CT: association with regional lymph node metastasis and N stage

PURPOSE

To determine whether the volume of resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) measured at multidetector computed tomography (CT) is associated with regional lymph node metastasis and N stage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Two hundred sixteen patients with resectable AEG prospectively underwent contrast material-enhanced thoracoabdominal multidetector CT less than 2 weeks before curative resection. Gross tumor volume was retrospectively measured on CT scans. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify whether gross tumor volume is associated with regional lymph node metastasis. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare gross tumor volume among N stages, with Bonferroni correction for multigroup comparisons. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine if gross tumor volume could help classify N stage.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that gross tumor volume is associated with regional lymph node metastasis (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that gross tumor volume is an independent risk factor of lymph node metastasis (P = .023, odds ratio = 2.791). The Mann-Whitney U test showed that gross tumor volume could help differentiate between stage N0 and stages N1-N2 or N1-N3 disease and between stages N1-N2 and stage N3 disease (P < .0001 for all). In patients with stage T1-T3 AEG, gross tumor volume could help differentiate between stage N0 and stages N1-N2 (cutoff, 15.23 cm(3)) or N1-N3 (cutoff, 17.16 cm(3)) disease and between stages N1-N2 and stage N3 disease (cutoff, 33.96 cm(3)). In patients with stage T3 AEG, gross tumor volume could help differentiate stage N0 from stages N1-N2 (cutoff, 18.41 cm(3)) or N1-N3 (cutoff, 19.30 cm(3)) disease and stages N1-N2 from stage N3 disease (cutoff, 33.96 cm(3)).

CONCLUSION

Gross tumor volume of AEG measured with multidetector CT is associated with regional lymph node metastasis and N stage.

Clinicopathological characteristics and optimal management for esophagogastric junctional cancer; a single center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Esophagogastric junctional (EGJ) cancer occurs in the mucosa near the esophagogastric junction, and has characteristics of both esophageal and gastric malignancies; its optimal treatment strategy is controversial.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent curative surgery with lymphadenectomy for EGJ cancer. Tumor specimens were categorized by histology and location into four types-centered in the esophagus < 5 cm from EGJ (type E), which were subtyped as (i) squamous-cell carcinoma (SQ) or (ii) adenocarcinoma (AD); (iii) any histological tumor centered in the stomach < 5 cm from EGJ, with EGJ invasion (type Ge); (iv) any histological tumor centered in the stomach < 5 cm from EGJ, without EGJ invasion (type G)-and classified by TNM system; these were compared to patients' clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 92 EGJ cancer patients were studied. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 35.5 months. Tumors were categorized as 12 type E (SQ), 6 type E (AD), 27 type Ge and 47 type G; of these 7 (58.3%), 3 (50%), 19 (70.4%) and 14 (29.8%) and 23 patients, respectively, had lymph node metastases. No patients with type E (AD) and Ge tumors had cervical lymph node metastasis; those with type G tumors had no nodal metastasis at cervical and mediastinal lymph nodes. Multivariate analysis showed that type E (AD) tumor was an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

We should distinguish type Ge tumor from type E (AD) tumor because of the clinicopathological and prognostic differentiation. Extended gastrectomy with or without lower esophagectomy according to tumor location and lower mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenectomy are recommended for EGJ cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan, UMIN000008596.