Clinical and prognostic differences between surgically resected right-sided and left-sided colorectal cancer

Prognostic value of primary tumor location in colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis

The clinical, histological, and molecular differences between right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (RCC) have received considerable attention. Over the past decade, many articles have been published concerning the association between primary tumor location (PTL) of colorectal cancer and survival outcomes. Therefore, there is a growing need for an updated meta-analysis integrating the outcomes of recent studies to determine the prognostic role of right vs left-sidedness of PTL in patients with colorectal cancer. We conducted a comprehensive database review using PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane library databases from February 2016 to March 2023 for prospective or retrospective studies reporting data on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of RCC compared with LCC. A total of 60 cohort studies comprising 1,494,445 patients were included in the meta-analysis. We demonstrated that RCC is associated with a significantly increased risk of death compared with LCC by 25% (hazard ratio (HR), 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-1.31; I2 = 78.4%; Z = 43.68). Results showed that patients with RCC have a worse OS compared with LCC only in advanced stages (Stage III: HR, 1.275; 95% CI 1.16-1.4; P = 0.0002; I2 = 85.8%; Stage IV: HR, 1.34; 95% CI 1.25-1.44; P < 0.0001; I2 = 69.2%) but not in primary stages (Stage I/II: HR, 1.275; 95% CI 1.16-1.4; P = 0.0002; I2 = 85.8%). Moreover, a meta-analysis of 13 studies including 812,644 patients revealed that there is no significant difference in CSS between RCC and LCC (HR, 1.121; 95% CI 0.97-1.3; P = 0.112). Findings from the present meta-analysis highlight the importance of PTL in clinical decision-making for patients with CRC, especially in advanced stages. We provide further evidence supporting the hypothesis that RCC and LCC are distinct disease entities that should be managed differently.

A pairwise immune gene model for predicting overall survival and stratifying subtypes of colon adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

There is increasing evidence for a close correlation between risk stratification, prognosis and the immune environment in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). However, the efficacy of immunotherapy is different among different patients with COAD. Therefore, the current work tends to use immune-related gene to develop a gene-pair model to evaluate the COAD prognosis, and to develop a new method for risk stratification of COAD, which is conducive to better predict the immunotherapy effect of patients.

METHODS

Specifically, from the TCGA and GEO (GSE14333 and GSE39582) databases, we first collected gene expression profiles, associated survival follow-up information of COAD patients. Through systematic bioinformatics analysis, we established a prognosis-related model of colon cancer with three pairs of "immune gene pairs", with uni- and multivariate and lasso cox regression analyses verifying the model stability. Most immune cells showed markedly different levels of infiltration between the two risk subgroups calculated by the model. More, single-cell RNA-seq analyses were also performed to validate the selected genes in the immune gene-pair model.

RESULTS

A prognosis-related model of colon cancer with three pairs of "immune gene pairs" were built and validated by several datasets. The analysis of immune landscape of COAD revealed that low-risk subgroup obtained by the prognosis-related model for COAD can be further divided into three subclusters with different prognosis. Then, we applied the Tumor online Prognostic analyses Platform (ToPP) to construct a prognostic model using these five genes. Results show that APOD, ISG20 and STC2 are risk factors, while CXCL9 and IL7R are protection factors. We also found that only the five-gene model could also predict the prognosis of COAD patients, indicating the robustness of the gene-pair model. Among the five genes, including CXCL9, APOD, STC2, ISG20, and IL7R, in the gene-pair model, single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the high expression of CXCL9 and IL7R in inflammatory macrophages. Using cell-cell interaction and trajectory analysis, data indicate that CXCL9+/IL7R+ pro-inflammatory macrophages were capable of secreting and activating more anti-tumor pathways than CXCL9-/IL7R- pro-inflammatory macrophages.

CONCLUSIONS

In short, we have successfully developed an "immune gene pair" related model that can judge the prognostic status of patients with COAD and may contribute to risk stratification and evaluate potential beneficiaries of immunotherapy, providing new ideas for the anti-COAD management and therapy.

Clinical implication of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with right-sided colon cancer after complete mesocolic excision: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background

This study aimed to assess the clinical implications of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in patients with right-sided colon cancer (RCC) after complete mesocolic excision (CME).

Methods

A total of 441 patients with RCC who underwent CME were included. The optimal cut-off value for the ALI was determined using the X-tile software. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and long-term outcomes. Predictive nomograms for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were constructed after propensity score matching (PSM), and their performance was assessed using the net reclassification improvement index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement index (IDI), and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (time-ROC) curve analysis.

Results

The optimal preoperative ALI cut-off value was 36.3. After PSM, ASA classification 3/4, operative duration, and a low ALI were independently associated with postoperative complications in the multivariate analysis (all P<0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that an age >60 years, a carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level >37 U/mL, pathological N+ stage, and a low ALI were independently correlated with OS (all P<0.05). A CA19-9 level >37 U/mL, pathological N+ stage, lymphovascular invasion, and a low ALI were independent predictors of DFS (all P<0.05). Predictive nomograms for OS and DFS were constructed using PSM. Furthermore, a nomogram combined with the ALI was consistently superior to a non-ALI nomogram or the pathological tumor-node-metastasis classification based on the NRI, IDI, and time-ROC curve analysis after PSM (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

The ALI was an effective indicator for predicting short- and long-term outcomes in patients with RCC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02712-0.

Survival after curative resection for stage I colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma

Purpose

The prognostic value of the mucinous adenocarcinoma histotype on the early stages especially for stage I colorectal cancer (CRC) is still unclear. This study determined the clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term outcome of stage I colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAC).

Methods

Among the total of 530 patients with stage I CRC (58 having MAC and 472 having non-MAC) who underwent radical resection, the correlation between clinicopathological factors and MAC was analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether mucinous histotype itself was an independent prognostic impact in stage I patients.

Results

MACs were observed more frequently located in the colon than rectum (p = 0.049), more frequently displayed the deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) phenotype (p = 0.001) and had a greater frequency of T2 stage (p = 0.002). The rate of recurrence was 15.3% and the mortality was 9.2% among all stage I CRC patients. There was no difference in disease-free survival and overall survival between MACs and non-MACs. On multivariate analysis, older age (p = 0.009, hazard ratio: 2.22), rectal cancer (p = 0.008, hazard ratio: 3.21), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (p < 0.001, hazard ratio: 6.28), and deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) phenotypes (p = 0.044, hazard ratio: 2.62) were independently associated to poor survival of stage I CRC. A high carcinoembryonic antigen level (p = 0.034, hazard ratio: 1.86), rectal cancer (p = 0.035, hazard ratio: 1.81), LVI (p = 0.002, hazard ratio: 3.59) and dMMR phenotypes (p = 0.009, hazard ratio: 2.85) were independently related to short disease-free survival of stage I CRC.

Conclusions

Compared with non-MAC, MAC patients had more T2 patients and more dMMR phenotypes in stage I CRC at presentation, but the mucinous histology is not a significant predictor of recurrence and prognosis in stage I CRC.

Pathological Features and Prognostication in Colorectal Cancer

The prognostication of colorectal cancer (CRC) has traditionally relied on staging as defined by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging classifications. However, clinically, there appears to be differences in survival patterns independent of stage, suggesting a complex interaction of stage, pathological features, and biomarkers playing a role in guiding prognosis, risk stratification, and guiding neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. Histological features such as tumour budding, perineural invasion, apical lymph node involvement, lymph node yield, lymph node ratio, and molecular features such as MSI, KRAS, BRAF, and CDX2 may assist in prognostication and optimising adjuvant treatment. This study provides a comprehensive review of the pathological features and biomarkers that are important in the prognostication and treatment of CRC. We review the importance of pathological features and biomarkers that may be important in colorectal cancer based on the current evidence in the literature.

Comparison of Resected Malignant Tumors of the Right- and Left-Sided Colon—Is There a Difference?

Embryological, anatomical, and immunological differences between the right-sided and left-sided colons are well known, but the difference in oncological behavior of colon tumors has only recently become the main subject of studies. Published articles propose that there is a difference not only in symptoms, but also in survival. Our aim was to analyze the clinicopathological and oncological differences among our patients who had been operated for colon cancer in our department. We examined the historical data of our patients who underwent colon resection for malignancy between 1st of January 2016 and 31st of December 2018. Tumor markers, histological results, postoperative complications, and oncological therapies were investigated. The primary outcome was overall survival. We analyzed our patients’ survival data with Kaplan–Meier log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. In our study, 267 patients were enrolled. One hundred thirty-three (49.8%) patients had right-sided colon cancer; 134 (50.2%) patients had left-sided colon cancer. Patients with right-sided colon cancer were significantly more likely to have mucinous adenocarcinoma (p = 0.037). No significant differences were revealed in overall survival between right-sided colon cancer and left-sided colon cancer patients (p = 0.381). Additional subgroup analysis showed that there were no significant differences in overall survival for laterality neither in the metastatic group (p = 0.824) nor in the non-metastatic group (p = 0.345). Based on the conflicting previous study results, our findings repeatedly highlight that the relationship between tumor location in the colon and overall survival is not straightforward.

Sarcopenia and primary tumor location influence patients outcome after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases

INTRODUCTION

Right-sided and left-sided colorectal cancer (CRC) is known to differ in their molecular carcinogenic pathways. The prevalence of sarcopenia is known to worsen the outcome after hepatic resection. We sought to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia and its prognostic application according to the primary CRC tumor site.

METHODS

355 patients (62% male) who underwent liver resection in our center were identified. Clinicopathologic characteristics and long-term outcomes were stratified by sarcopenia and primary tumor location (right-sided vs. left-sided). Tumors in the coecum, right sided and transverse colon were defined as right-sided, tumors in the left colon and rectum were defined as left-sided. Sarcopenia was assessed using the skeletal muscle index (SMI) with a measurement of the skeletal muscle area at the level L3.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent right sided colectomy (n = 233, 65%) showed a higher prevalence of sarcopenia (35.2% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.03). These patients also had higher chances for postoperative complications with Clavien Dindo >3 (OR 1.21 CI95% 0.9-1.81, p = 0.05) and higher odds for mortality related to CRC (HR 1.2 CI95% 0.8-1.8, p = 0.03).On multivariable analysis prevalence of sarcopenia remained independently associated with worse overall survival and disease free survival (overall survival: HR 1.47 CI 95% 1.03-2.46, p = 0.03; HR 1.74 CI95% 1.09-3.4, p = 0.05 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia is known to have a worse prognosis in patients with CRLM and CRC. Depending on the primary location sarcopenia has a variable effect on the outcome after liver resection.

Differences in T cell immune-related lncRNA and mRNA expression patterns between right- and left-sided colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

Right-sided colorectal cancer (RCRC) and left-sided colorectal cancer (LCRC) harbor different genetic alterations associated with immune response.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the differences in T cell immune-related RNA expression patterns between RCRC and LCRC.

METHODS

The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and lncRNAs (DElncRNAs) between LCRC and RCRC were screened from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. A correlation analysis between DEGs or DElncRNAs and differential T cells was also performed to obtain T cell-related genes, followed by miRNA prediction. The mRNA-lncRNA network and the competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network were subsequently constructed, and the expression level of mRNA in the ceRNA network was verified using GSE104645.

RESULTS

RCRC patients had a poorer prognosis and were older than LCRC patients. In total, 923 DEGs and 328 DElncRNAs were screened between LCRC and RCRC patients. Compared to RCRC patients, LCRC patients showed a decrease in CD8⁺ T cells. In addition, 26 miRNAs, 8 mRNAs, and 10 lncRNAs were included in the ceRNA network. Finally, the validation analysis revealed that CDHR1 and PRLR were significantly downregulated, while TRIB2 was upregulated in RCRC patients compared to LCRC patients.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of T cell immune-related RNA expression might provide new insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of the differences between LCRC and RCRC.

Brain derived neurotrophic factor declines after complete curative resection in gastrointestinal cancer

Background

Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a neurotrophin involved in neural and metabolic diseases, but it is also one of the crucial factors in cancer development and metastases. In the current study, we investigated serum BDNF concentrations in patients that underwent surgical treatment for colorectal cancer or pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Serum BDNF concentrations were measured with standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, before and on the third day after the operation, in 50 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer and 25 patients with pancreatic cancer (tumours in the head of pancreas). We compared pre- and postoperative BDNF levels, according to the subsequent TNM stage, histologic stage, lymph node involvement, neuro- or angio-invasion, and resection range.

Results

In the pancreatic cancer group, BDNF concentrations fell significantly postoperatively (p = 0.011). In patients that underwent resections, BDNF concentrations fell (p = 0.0098), but not in patients that did not undergo resections (i.e., laparotomy alone). There were significant pre- and postoperative differences in BDNF levels among patients with (p = 0.021) and without (p = 0.034) distant metastases. Significant reductions in BDNF were observed postoperatively in patients with small tumours (i.e., below the median size; p = 0.023), in patients with negative angio- or lymphatic invasion (p = 0.028, p = 0.011, respectively), and in patients with lymph node ratios above 0.17 (p = 0.043). In the colon cancer group, the serum BDNF concentrations significantly fell postoperatively in the entire group (p = 0.0076) and in subgroups of patients with or without resections (p = 0.034, p = 0.0179, respectively). Significant before-after differences were found in subgroups with angioinvasions (p = 0.050) and in those without neuroinvasions (p = 0.049). Considering the TNM stages, the postoperative BDNF concentration fell in groups with (p = 0.0218) and without (p = 0.034) distant metastases and in patients with tumours below the median size (p = 0.018).

Conclusion

Our results suggested that BDNF might play an important role in gastrointestinal cancer development. BDNF levels were correlated with tumour volume, and with neuro-, angio- and lymphatic invasions. In pancreatic cancer, BDNF concentrations varied according to the surgical procedure and they fell significantly after tumour resections. Thus, BDNF may serve as a potential marker of complete resections in underdiagnosed patients. However, this hypothesis requires further investigation. In contrast, no differences according to the procedure was made in patients with colon cancer.

Investigation of clinicopathological characters and gene expression features in colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma utilizing CMS classification

Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a rare pathological type of colorectal cancer, of which the clinicopathological features and genetic background have not yet been fully investigated. Previous research has focused on the optimization of colorectal cancer treatment utilizing consensus molecular subtyping (CMS). However, it is not known what type of CMS would be designated to SRCC treatment. In the current study, of 1,350 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer who underwent surgery, 14 were diagnosed with SRCC. The case-control cohort that fit the clinical background of the SRCC case was constructed. Statistical comparison between the SRCC group and the case-control cohort was performed among clinicopathological variables. SRCC and well to moderately adenocarcinoma case mRNA were submitted to microarray analysis and CMS analysis. Compared with the case-control cohort, the SRCC group was located more in the right-sided colon, the lymphatic invasion was more severe and the peritoneal dissemination was more frequent. The cancer-specific survival and the progression-free survival were significantly worse in the SRCC group compared with the case-control cohort. Microarray and CMS analysis identified that one SRCC case was significantly well assigned in the CMS 4 group and the other case was assigned in the CMS 1 group. Gene set analysis revealed the upregulation of EMT related genes and the downregulation of fatty acid, glycolysis, differentiation, MYC, HNF4A, DNA repair genes. In conclusion, the clinical characteristics of SRCC are severe but there is a possibility of the presence of different phenotypes according to CMS analysis.

Left colon as a novel high-risk factor for postoperative recurrence of stage II colon cancer

Background

It is not clear whether stage II colon and rectal cancer have the same risk factors for recurrence. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for postoperative recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 990 patients who had undergone radical surgery for stage II colorectal cancer. Patients’ pathological features and characteristics including age, sex, family history, body mass index, tumor diameter, gross type of tumor, infiltration degree (T3/T4), tumor grade, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion, pathologic examination of lymph node number, and preoperative carcinoembryonic assay (CEA) level was compared between patients with and without recurrence. Finally, the prediction of the left and right colons was analyzed.

Results

The mean ages of the colon cancer and rectal cancer patients were 69.5 years and 66.4 years, respectively. In total, 508 (82.1%) and 285 (76.8%) patients were treated laparoscopically for colon cancer and rectal cancer, respectively, with median follow-up periods of 42.2 months and 41.8 months, respectively. Forty-four recurrences occurred in both the colon cancer (7.1%) and rectal cancer (11.9%) groups. The preoperative serum CEA level and T4 infiltration were significantly higher in recurrent colorectal cancer patients. The postoperative recurrence rate of left colon cancer (descending colon, sigmoid colon) was higher than that of right colon cancer (cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon) (OR 2.191, 95% CI 1.091–4.400, P = 0.027). In COX survival factor analysis of colon cancer, the left colon is one of the independent risk factors (risk ratio 5.377, 95% CI 0.216–0.88, P = 0.02). In disease-free survival (DFS), the left colon has a relatively poor prognosis (P = 0.05). However, in the COX analysis and prognosis analysis of OS, no difference was found between the left colon and the right colon.

Conclusion

Preoperative CEA and depth of infiltration (T4) are high-risk factors associated with recurrence and are prognostic factors in stage II colorectal cancer. Left colon is also a risk factor for postoperative recurrence of stage II colon cancer.

Tumor sidedness influences prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in colon cancer patients undergoing curative surgery

This study aimed to evaluate prognostic impacts of the number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and LN ratio on cancer-specific mortality after surgery in patients with right-sided colon cancer (RCC) or left-sided colon cancer (LCC) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Number of LNs examined and LN ratio were treated as categorical and/or continuous. Competing risks proportional hazards regressions adjusted by propensity score were performed. All included patients had stage I, II, or III disease, and 45.1% of them had RCC. RCC and LCC patients with high level of LNs examined had better prognosis after segmental resection or hemicolectomy. RCC and LCC patients with higher LN ratio had worse prognosis regardless of surgery. Survival benefit of having high level of LNs examined was observed in RCC patients with stage I, II, or III disease, but only in LCC patients with stage II disease. Both higher LN ratio and high level of LN were negative prognostic factors for cancer-specific mortality in stage III patients regardless of tumor sidedness. In conclusion, RCC patients in various conditions had worse or comparable prognosis compared to their LCC counterparts, which reflected the severity of LN metastasis.