Clinical and radiological course of intracerebral haemorrhage associated with the new non-vitamin K anticoagulants

Coagulation Tests and Reversal Agents in Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants: The Challenging Scenarios of Life-Threatening Bleeding and Unplanned Invasive Procedures

In clinical practice, the number of patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has consistently increased over the years. Since anticoagulant therapy has been associated with an annual incidence of major bleeding (MB) events of approximately 2% to 3.5%, it is of paramount importance to understand how to manage anticoagulated patients with major or life-threatening bleeding. A considerable number of these patients' conditions necessitate hospitalization, and the administration of reversal agents may be imperative to manage and control bleeding episodes effectively. Importantly, effective strategies for reversing the anticoagulant effects of DOACs have been well recognized. Specifically, idarucizumab has obtained regulatory approval for the reversal of dabigatran, and andexanet alfa has recently been approved for reversing the effects of apixaban or rivaroxaban in patients experiencing life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding events. Moreover, continuous endeavors are being made to develop supplementary reversal agents. In emergency scenarios where specific reversal agents might not be accessible, non-specific hemostatic agents such as prothrombin complex concentrate can be utilized to neutralize the anticoagulant effects of DOACs. However, it is paramount to emphasize that specific reversal agents, characterized by their efficacy and safety, should be the preferred choice when suitable. Moreover, it is worth noting that adherence to the guidelines for the reversal agents is poor, and there is a notable gap between international recommendations and actual clinical practices in this regard. This narrative review aims to provide physicians with a practical approach to managing specific reversal agents.

Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Critically Ill Adults with Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The objective of this document is to provide recommendations on the formal reliability of major clinical predictors often associated with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) neuroprognostication.

METHODS

A narrative systematic review was completed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology and the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, Setting questions. Predictors, which included both individual clinical variables and prediction models, were selected based on clinical relevance and attention in the literature. Following construction of the evidence profile and summary of findings, recommendations were based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria. Good practice statements addressed essential principles of neuroprognostication that could not be framed in the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Timing, Setting format.

RESULTS

Six candidate clinical variables and two clinical grading scales (the original ICH score and maximally treated ICH score) were selected for recommendation creation. A total of 347 articles out of 10,751 articles screened met our eligibility criteria. Consensus statements of good practice included deferring neuroprognostication-aside from the most clinically devastated patients-for at least the first 48-72 h of intensive care unit admission; understanding what outcomes would have been most valued by the patient; and counseling of patients and surrogates whose ultimate neurological recovery may occur over a variable period of time. Although many clinical variables and grading scales are associated with ICH poor outcome, no clinical variable alone or sole clinical grading scale was suggested by the panel as currently being reliable by itself for use in counseling patients with ICH and their surrogates, regarding functional outcome at 3 months and beyond or 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines provide recommendations on the formal reliability of predictors of poor outcome in the context of counseling patients with ICH and surrogates and suggest broad principles of neuroprognostication. Clinicians formulating their judgments of prognosis for patients with ICH should avoid anchoring bias based solely on any one clinical variable or published clinical grading scale.

Management of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is considered a potentially severe complication of oral anticoagulants (OACs) and antiplatelet therapy (APT). Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who survived ICH present both an increased ischemic and bleeding risk. Due to its lethality, initiating or reinitiating OACs in ICH survivors with AF is challenging. Since ICH recurrence may be life-threatening, patients who experience an ICH are often not treated with OACs, and thus remain at a higher risk of thromboembolic events. It is worthy of mention that subjects with a recent ICH and AF have been scarcely enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ischemic stroke risk management in AF. Nevertheless, in observational studies, stroke incidence and mortality of patients with AF who survived ICH had been shown to be significantly reduced among those treated with OACs. However, the risk of hemorrhagic events, including recurrent ICH, was not necessarily increased, especially in patients with post-traumatic ICH. The optimal timing of anticoagulation initiation or restarting after an ICH in AF patients is also largely debated. Finally, the left atrial appendage occlusion option should be evaluated in AF patients with a very high risk of recurrent ICH. Overall, an interdisciplinary unit consisting of cardiologists, neurologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, patients, and their families should be involved in management decisions. According to available evidence, this review outlines the most appropriate anticoagulation strategies after an ICH that should be adopted to treat this neglected subset of patients.

Distinct Behavior of Traumatic versus Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hematomas: Different Biology or Impact of Age?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 Patients with large intracerebral hematomas (ICH) may demonstrate different demographics and underlying brain and systemic diseases, as well as different radiologic courses and distinct outcomes. It remains unclear whether their different behavior attributes to a different biology of the ICH or to the asymmetric characteristics of the two populations. To analyze and adjust for potential sources of selection and treatment bias, our study compared age-matched patients with traumatic and nontraumatic ICH in a single cohort diagnosed and treated in the same surgical department.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 We analyzed 135 consecutive patients with traumatic (n = 90) or spontaneous ICH (n = 45) undergoing treatment at a surgical intensive care unit of an urban university hospital. We documented their differences before and after adjustment for age in terms of demographics, the therapies applied, their radiologic (i.e., volume and rate of ICH expansion [HE]) and clinical (patients' outcome at 30 days) course, the length of hospital and ICU stay, as well as the hospital costs.

RESULTS

 Patients with traumatic ICH demonstrated more favorable clinical and radiologic characteristics at admission, that is, higher Glasgow Coma Scale score (p < 0.001), less frequently dilated pupil (p = 0.028), lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0.001), smaller ICH volume (p < 0.001), noneloquent (p < 0.001) or nonintraventricular (p = 0.003) ICH locations, as well as underwent fewer neurosurgical interventions (p < 0.001) and showed a better outcome (p = 0.041), defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale 4 and 5. After adjustment for age, no different outcomes were observed. Of note, elderly patients on novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were more likely to develop an HE compared with those on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs, p = 0.05) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) but not after spontaneous ICH.

CONCLUSION

 Our data reveal a significant heterogeneity within the traumatic series. Whereas younger patients show an excellent outcome, the elderly population of the traumatic cases demonstrates a poor outcome similar to that of the nontraumatic cohort. HE under NOACs rather than under VKAs is more likely in the elderly after TBI. Larger prospective trials are warranted to elucidate the potential individual underlying molecular mechanisms for the development of an ICH and HE in these diseases.

How do you manage ANTICOagulant therapy in neurosurgery? The ANTICO survey of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINCH)

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulant assumption is a concern in neurosurgical patient that implies a delicate balance between the risk of thromboembolism versus the risk of peri- and postoperative hemorrhage.

METHODS

We performed a survey among 129 different neurosurgical departments in Italy to evaluate practice patterns regarding the management of neurosurgical patients taking anticoagulant drugs. Furthermore, we reviewed the available literature, with the aim of providing a comprehensive but practical summary of current recommendations.

RESULTS

Our survey revealed that there is a lack of knowledge, mostly regarding the indication and the strategies of anticoagulant reversal in neurosurgical clinical practice. This may be due a lack of national and international guidelines for the care of anticoagulated neurosurgical patients, along with the fact that coagulation and hemostasis are not simple topics for a neurosurgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

To overcome this issue, establishment of hospital-wide policy concerning management of anticoagulated patients and developed in an interdisciplinary manner are strongly recommended.

Clinical and Radiological Characteristics of Vitamin K Versus Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulation-Related Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Recent studies indicated that functional outcome after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) related to direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC-ICH) is similar, if not better, than vitamin K antagonist (VKA)-related ICH (VKA-ICH) due to a smaller initial hematoma volume (HV). However, the association with hematoma expansion (HE) and location is not well understood.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 102 consecutive patients with acute non-traumatic ICH on oral anticoagulation therapy to determine HV and HE stratified by hematoma location, and the relation to the 90-day outcome.

RESULTS

DOAC-ICH (n = 25) and VKA-ICH (n = 77) had a similar admission HV and HE (unadjusted p > 0.05, each). Targeted reversal strategies were used in 93.5% of VKA-ICH versus 8% of DOAC-ICH. After adjustment, an unfavorable 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin scale score 4-6) was independently associated with a lower admission Glasgow Coma Scale score (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.26-2.10; p < 0.001) and greater HV (OR 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.05; p = 0.046). After exclusion of patients without follow-up head computed tomography to allow for adjustment by occurrence of HE, VKA-ICH was associated with an approximately 3.5 times greater odds for a poor 90-day outcome (OR 3.64; 95% CI 1.01-13.09; p = 0.048). However, there was no significant association of the oral anticoagulant strategy with 90-day outcome in the entire cohort (OR 2.85; 95% CI 0.69-11.86; p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

DOAC use did not relate to worse HE, HV, and functional outcome after ICH, adding to the notion that DOAC is a safe alternative to VKA even in the absence of access to targeted reversal strategies (which are still not universally available).

Mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage associated with antiplatelet agents, oral anticoagulants or no antithrombotic therapy

The association between preceding treatment with antiplatelet agents (APs), vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and mortality after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains unclear. The aim of this multicenter, prospective cohort study was to assess the risk for death after ICH in consecutive patients who were on treatment with APs, VKAs, DOACs, or no antithrombotic agent. The primary outcome was in-hospital death by day 30. ICH volume at admission and volume expansion were centrally assessed. Out of 598 study patients, in-hospital death occurred in 21% of patients who were on treatment with APs, 25% with VKAs, 30% with DOACs, and 13% with no antithrombotics. Crude death rate was higher in patients on antithrombotics as compared to patients receiving no antithrombotic agent. At multivariate analysis, age (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04-1.10), previous stroke (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.14-2.93), GCS ≤8 at admission (HR 6.06; 95% CI 3.16-9.74) and GCS 9-12 (HR 3.38; 95% CI 1.81-6.33) were independent predictors of death. Treatment with APs (HR 1.29; 95% CI 0.61-2.76), VKAs (HR 1.42; 95% CI 0.70-2.88) or DOACs (HR 1.28; 95% CI 0.61-2.73) were not predictors of death in the overall study population, in non-trauma associated ICH as well as when GCS was not included in the model. ICH volume and volume expansion were independent predictors of death. In conclusion, preceding treatment with antithrombotic is associated with the severity of ICH. Age, previous stroke and clinical severity at presentation were independent predictors of in-hospital death in patients with ICH.

Management of Patients with Acute Subdural Hemorrhage During Treatment with Direct Oral Anticoagulants

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation therapy is a major risk factor for unfavorable patient outcomes following (traumatic) intracranial hemorrhage. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic diseases. Data on patients treated for acute subdural hemorrhage (SDH) during anticoagulation therapy with DOAC are limited.

METHODS

We analyzed the medical records of consecutive patients treated at our institution for acute SDH during anticoagulation therapy with DOAC or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) during a period of 30 months. Patient characteristics such as results of imaging and laboratory studies, treatment modalities and short-term patient outcomes were included.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients with preadmission DOAC (n = 65) or VKA (n = 63) intake were compared. The overall 30-day mortality rate of this patient cohort was 27%, and it did not differ between patients with DOAC or VKA intake (26% vs. 27%; p = 1.000). Similarly, the rates of neurosurgical intervention (65%) and intracranial re-hemorrhage (18%) were comparable. Prothrombin complex concentrates were administered more frequently in patients with VKA intake than in patients with DOAC intake (90% vs. 58%; p < 0.0001). DOAC treatment in patients with acute SDH did not increase in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates compared to VKA treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the favorable safety profile of DOAC in patients, even in the setting of intracranial hemorrhage. However, the availability of specific antidotes to DOAC may further improve the management of these patients.

Security profile of direct anticoagulants. Preferred use in atrial fibrillation

A multidisciplinary panel of cardiologists, neurologists, internal medicine and specialists in hemostasis and thrombosis has elaborated this document showing recent scientific evidences supporting a better profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitaminK antagonists (VKA), as well as the indications of specific antidotes and hemostatic agents to reverse the anticoagulant effects of DOACs. The analysis reinforces the best profile of DOACs and its special benefit in patients with basal high hemorrhagic risk.

Meta-analysis of haematoma volume, haematoma expansion and mortality in intracerebral haemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulant use

OBJECTIVE

To obtain precise estimates of age, haematoma volume, secondary haematoma expansion (HE) and mortality for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) taking oral anticoagulants [Vitamin K antagonists (VKA-ICH) or non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC-ICH)] and those not taking oral anticoagulants (non-OAC ICH) at ICH symptom onset.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing VKA-ICH or NOAC-ICH or both with non-OAC ICH. Primary outcomes were haematoma volume (in ml), HE, and mortality (in-hospital and 3-month). We calculated odds ratios (ORs) using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) and determined the mean ICH volume difference.

RESULTS

We identified 19 studies including data from 16,546 patients with VKA-ICH and 128,561 patients with non-OAC ICH. Only 2 studies reported data on 4943 patients with NOAC-ICH. Patients with VKA-ICH were significantly older than patients with non-OAC ICH (mean age difference: 5.55 years, 95%CI 4.03-7.07, p < 0.0001, I² = 92%, p < 0.001). Haematoma volume was significantly larger in VKA-ICH with a mean difference of 9.66 ml (95%CI 6.24-13.07 ml, p < 0.00001; I² = 42%, p = 0.05). HE occurred significantly more often in VKA-ICH (OR 2.96, 95%CI 1.74-4.97, p < 0.00001; I² = 65%). VKA-ICH was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (VKA-ICH: 32.8% vs. non-OAC ICH: 22.4%; OR 1.83, 95%CI 1.61-2.07, p < 0.00001, I² = 20%, p = 0.27) and 3-month mortality (VKA-ICH: 47.1% vs. non-OAC ICH: 25.5%; OR 2.24, 95%CI 1.52-3.31, p < 0.00001, I² = 71%, p = 0.001). We did not find sufficient data for a meta-analysis comparing NOAC-ICH and non-OAC-ICH.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirms, refines and expands findings from prior studies. We provide precise estimates of key prognostic factors and outcomes for VKA-ICH, which has larger haematoma volume, increased rate of HE and higher mortality compared to non-OAC ICH. There are insufficient data on NOACs.

Intake of NOAC is associated with hematoma expansion of intracerebral hematomas after traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE

Novel oral anticoagulants are increasingly replacing vitamin K antagonists in the prophylaxis of thromboembolism as they are associated with lower incidence of spontaneous intracerebral hematomas and they do not require drug level monitoring. However, management dilemmas are apparent in patients on novel oral anticoagulants who have developed intracerebral hematomas after traumatic brain injury, since clinical experience with their reversal strategies is limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 90 patients with traumatic intracerebral hematomas undergoing treatment at the surgical intensive care unit of the BG University Clinic Bergmannsheil in Bochum between 2015 and 2018. We analyzed potential prognostic factors for their radiological (expansion of intracerebral hematoma) and clinical (patients' outcome) course, in particular the role of novel oral anticoagulants.

RESULTS

71.1% of patients were male; mean age was 67.3 years. Hematoma's expansion occurred in 35.9% of our patients, whereas 62.2% of our cohort showed a favorable outcome, defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale 4 and 5. Intake of novel oral anticoagulants was associated with a higher rate of hematoma's expansion compared to patients on vitamin K antagonists (p = 0.05) or to patients with normal coagulation status (p = 0.002). A younger age (p < 0.001) was identified as the sole independent prognostic factor for a more favorable outcome, after excluding our cases, who underwent a cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed a higher rate of hematoma's expansion in patients with traumatic intracerebral hematomas on novel oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin K antagonists and recommend the consideration of prophylactic reversal of the novel oral anticoagulants at admission. Larger prospective trials are warranted to conclude whether the current specific reversal protocols are safe and effective.

Similar outcomes between vitamin K and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants associated intracerebral hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

The application of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) reduces the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in comparison with vitamin K antagonist (VKA). However, the features and outcomes of NOAC-associated ICH are still unclear, especially for Asian populations.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 49 consecutive patients who had spontaneous ICH while using NOAC or VKA. We compared the clinical characteristics, ICH volume, 7-day and 3-month mortality, and functional outcomes at discharge and 3 months post-stroke using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) between NOAC- and VKA-associated ICH. The clinical features, ICH volume, ICH location, and/or treatment methods were statistically adjusted.

RESULTS

Among the 49 ICH patients, 15 (30.6%) were using NOAC and 34 (69.4%) were taking VKA. There were no significant differences in the initial ICH volume between groups (mean volume 34.2 ± 43.8 vs. 59.4 ± 46.5 mL, p = 0.061). The percentage of early mortality (within 7 days post-ICH) was significantly lower in the NOAC group (13.3% vs. 44.1%; p = 0.047), but the 3-month mortality was similar (33.3% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.294). The functional outcome was equally poor in both groups at discharge (p = 0.670) and 3 months post-ICH (mean mRS score 4.7 ± 1.3 vs. 4.6 ± 1.7, p = 0.766).

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in initial ICH volume, 90-day mortality, or functional outcomes between NOAC and VKA-associated ICH in Asians.

Hematoma location and morphology of anticoagulation-associated intracerebral hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To study hematoma location and morphology of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) associated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) and delineate causes and mechanism.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature research and meta-analysis of studies comparing neuroimaging findings in patients with OAC-ICH compared to those with ICH not associated with OAC (non-OAC ICH). We calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) for ICH location using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects method and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

We identified 8 studies including 6,259 patients (OAC-ICH n = 1,107, pooled OAC-ICH population 17.7%). There was some evidence for deep ICH location (defined as ICH in the thalamus, basal ganglia, internal capsule, or brainstem) being less frequent in patients with OAC-ICH (OAC-ICH: 450 of 1,102/40.8% vs non-OAC ICH: 2,656 of 4,819/55.1%; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88-1.00, p = 0.05, I ² = 0%) while cerebellar ICH location was significantly more common in OAC-ICH (OAC-ICH: 111 of 1,069/10.4% vs non-OAC ICH: 326 of 4,787/6.8%; RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12-1.89, p = 0.005, I ² = 21%) compared to non-OAC ICH. There was no statistically significant relationship to OAC use for lobar (OAC-ICH: 423 of 1,107/38.2% vs non-OAC ICH: 1,884 of 5,152/36.6%; RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89-1.17, p = 0.75, I ² = 53%, p for heterogeneity = 0.04) or brainstem ICH (OAC-ICH: 36 of 546/6.6% vs non-OAC ICH: 172 of 2,626/6.5%; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.58-1.87, p = 0.89, I ² = 59%, p for heterogeneity = 0.04). The risk for intraventricular extension (OAC-ICH: 436 of 840/51.9% vs non-OAC ICH: 1,429 of 3,508/40.7%; RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.16-1.36, p < 0.001, I ² = 0%) was significantly increased in patients with OAC-ICH. We found few data on ICH morphology in OAC-ICH vs non-OAC ICH.

CONCLUSION

The overrepresentation of cerebellar ICH location and intraventricular extension in OAC-ICH might have mechanistic relevance for the underlying arteriopathy, pathophysiology, or bleeding pattern of OAC-ICH, and should be investigated further.

Intracerebral hemorrhage associated with warfarin versus non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in Asian patients

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have half the incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) compared to those receiving warfarin. However, the differences in outcomes of NOAC-associated ICH (NICH) and warfarin-associated ICH (WICH) remain controversial. In this study, we investigated the clinical outcome and radiologic findings of ICH in Asian patients receiving NOACs or warfarin. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 544 ICH patients admitted to our hospital from January 2013 through December 2017, and compared the baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, ICH-related radiologic findings, and clinical outcome between the WICH and NICH groups. WICH and NICH were diagnosed in 46 and 13 patients, respectively. Lesions were located more frequently in the supratentorial deep area (45.7% and 46.2%) than the lobar area (30.4% and 30.8%) or brainstem and cerebellum (23.9% and 23.1%) in the WICH and NICH groups, respectively. The hematoma expansion and concomitant intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) rate was significantly higher in the WICH group than in the NICH group (58.7% versus 7.7%, P = 0.001 and 50.0% versus 15.4%, P = 0.030, respectively). Hematoma expansion (odds ratio [OR]: 50.546; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.763-924.748; P = 0.008) and concomitant IVH (OR: 9.240; 95% CI: 1.450-58.892; P = 0.019) were independently associated with mortality at three months, after adjustment for confounding variables. Our results indicate that the radiological findings and clinical outcome at three months in patients with ICH are more favorable in those receiving NOAC therapy than in those receiving warfarin treatment.

Outcomes of intraparenchymal hemorrhage after direct oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used as an alternative to vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) for anticoagulation and have shown lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage; however, there is disagreement in the literature over the outcomes of the intraparenchymal hemorrhages (IPH) associated with DOACs, and clinical concern regarding the lack of standardized reversal strategies for DOACs. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis was to compare mortality, hematoma volume, and risk of hematoma expansion in patients who developed an IPH on DOACs versus VKA. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were selected that reported on mortality, hematoma expansion, and hematoma volume in DOAC-associated IPH. Pooled risk ratios (RR) were calculated for mortality and hematoma expansion and pooled mean difference (MD) was calculated for hematoma volume (ml) using random-effect models. 15 studies reporting on 1238 patients were included in the systematic review. Eleven of these compared DOAC-IPH to VKA-IPH and were pooled quantitatively. DOAC-IPH was not associated with increased mortality risk (RR: 0.95, 95%-CI: 0.72 -1.27) or increased hematoma expansion risk (RR: 0.92; 95%-CI: 0.75-1.12) compared to VKA-IPH. The hematoma volume of DOAC- IPH was statistically significantly smaller than VKA-IPH (MD: -12.14 ml; 95%-CI: -15.38; -8.89). In conclusion, DOAC-IPH was not associated with increased mortality or hematoma expansion compared to VKA-IPH and may be associated with a smaller hematoma volume.

Neuroimaging and clinical outcomes of oral anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Whether intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) associated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC-ICH) has a better outcome compared to ICH associated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA-ICH) is uncertain.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between NOAC-ICH and VKA-ICH patients. The primary outcome measure was 30-day all-cause mortality. All outcomes were assessed in multivariate regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, ICH location, and intraventricular hemorrhage extension.

RESULTS

We included 7 eligible studies comprising 219 NOAC-ICH and 831 VKA-ICH patients (mean age = 77 years, 52.5% females). The 30-day mortality was similar between NOAC-ICH and VKA-ICH (24.3% vs 26.5%; hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67-1.31). However, in multivariate analyses adjusting for potential confounders, NOAC-ICH was associated with lower admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (linear regression coefficient = -2.83, 95% CI = -5.28 to -0.38), lower likelihood of severe stroke (NIHSS > 10 points) on admission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.30-0.84), and smaller baseline hematoma volume (linear regression coefficient = -0.24, 95% CI = -0.47 to -0.16). The two groups did not differ in the likelihood of baseline hematoma volume < 30cm³ (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.81-1.62), hematoma expansion (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.63-1.48), in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.49-1.11), functional status at discharge (common OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.57-1.07), or functional status at 3 months (common OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.75-1.43).

INTERPRETATION

Although functional outcome at discharge, 1 month, or 3 months was comparable after NOAC-ICH and VKA-ICH, patients with NOAC-ICH had smaller baseline hematoma volumes and less severe acute stroke syndromes. Ann Neurol 2018;84:702-712.

Prothrombin complex concentrate versus placebo, no intervention, or other interventions in critically bleeding patients associated with oral anticoagulant administration: a protocol for a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute critical bleeding is one of the most feared complications during treatment with oral anticoagulating agents. As more patients undergo treatment with anticoagulating agents, critically bleeding episodes in patients with vitamin K antagonists, thrombin inhibitor, or factor Xa inhibitor-inducted coagulopathy will be encountered frequently by physicians. Hence, an effective treatment capable of reversing the iatrogenic coagulopathy in the acute setting is needed. In randomised clinical trials and observational studies, prothrombin complex concentrate has been reported to be superior to other acute interventions, and many guidelines recommend prothrombin complex concentrate in treatment of critically bleeding patients. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the evidence of the effects of prothrombin complex concentrate compared with placebo, no intervention, or other treatment options in critically bleeding patients treated with oral anticoagulants.

METHODS/DESIGN

A comprehensive search for relevant published literature will be undertaken in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Science Citation Index, regulatory databases, and trial registers. We will include randomised clinical trials comparing prothrombin complex concentrate versus placebo, no intervention, or other interventions in critically bleeding patients with oral anticoagulant-induced coagulopathy. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be handled by two independent review authors. Meta-analysis will be performed as recommended by Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, bias will be assessed with domains, and trial sequential analysis will be conducted to control random errors. Certainty will be assessed by GRADE.

DISCUSSION

As critical bleeding in patients treated with oral anticoagulants is an increasing problem, an up-to-date systematic review evaluating the benefits and harms of prothrombin complex concentrate is urgently needed. It is the hope that this review will be able to guide best practice in treatment and clinical research of these critically bleeding patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018084371.

Outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage related to non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The characteristics and natural history of acute non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants (NOAC)-associated intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) are largely unknown. We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to compare baseline ICH volume, haematoma expansion and clinical outcomes between NOAC-ICH versus vitamin K antagonists-ICH (VKA-ICH).

METHODS

We searched PubMed and conference abstracts for observational studies comparing baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients with NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH using an appropriate keyword/MeSH term search strategy. Data were extracted following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. The main outcome measures were mortality and unfavourable functional outcome (modified Rankin Score: 4-6) at discharge and at 3 months, as well as ICH volumes and haematoma expansion rates in the two groups. Random-effects models with DerSimonian-Laird weights were used for pooled estimates calculation.

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 393 NOAC-ICH and 3482 VKA-ICH were pooled in meta-analysis. There was no difference in mean ICH-volume between the two groups (standard mean difference: -0.24; 95% CI -0.52 to 0.04, p=0.093). The rates of haematoma expansion were comparable in NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH (OR: 0.76; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.19, p=0.236). We did not find any difference between patients with NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH in all-cause mortality at discharge (OR: 0.66; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.05, p=0.077) and unfavourable functional outcome at discharge (OR: 0.77; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.44, p=0.413). The 3-month outcome was also comparable between the two ICH groups. Moderate-to-substantial statistical heterogeneity was noted.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that ICH volume, haematoma expansion, mortality and functional outcome appear to be similar for NOAC-ICH versus VKA-ICH. Large prospective cohorts and updated meta-analyses are needed to provide more precise estimates.

Comparing intracerebral hemorrhages associated with direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin

OBJECTIVES

This cross-sectional survey explored the characteristics and outcomes of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-associated nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs) by analyzing a large nationwide Japanese discharge database.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 2,245 patients who experienced ICHs while taking anticoagulants (DOAC: 227; warfarin: 2,018) and were urgently hospitalized at 621 institutions in Japan between April 2010 and March 2015. We compared the DOAC- and warfarin-treated patients based on their backgrounds, ICH severities, antiplatelet therapies at admission, hematoma removal surgeries, reversal agents, mortality rates, and modified Rankin Scale scores at discharge.

RESULTS

DOAC-associated ICHs were less likely to cause moderately or severely impaired consciousness (DOAC-associated ICHs: 31.3%; warfarin-associated ICHs: 39.4%; p = 0.002) or require surgical removal (DOAC-associated ICHs: 5.3%; warfarin-associated ICHs: 9.9%; p = 0.024) in the univariate analysis. Propensity score analysis revealed that patients with DOAC-associated ICHs also exhibited lower mortality rates within 1 day (odds ratio [OR] 4.96, p = 0.005), within 7 days (OR 2.29, p = 0.037), and during hospitalization (OR 1.96, p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide study revealed that DOAC-treated patients had less severe ICHs and lower mortality rates than did warfarin-treated patients, probably due to milder hemorrhages at admission and lower hematoma expansion frequencies.

Decision Algorithms for Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Practical Guide for Neurologists

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are valid alternative options to vitamin K antagonists due to their limited interactions with drugs or food and the fact that they do not require regular coagulation monitoring. To this regard, recent practice guidelines recommend that DOACs should be considered as first-line anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This review (1) outlines current international guidelines for the management of DOACs to prevent stroke in patients with NVAF, (2) outlines indications for elderly patients as well as specific settings including acute coronary syndromes and intracranial hemorrhage, and (3) offers a practical guide for the use of DOACs in neurological settings.