Limitations of the endonasal endoscopic approach in treating olfactory groove meningiomas. A systematic review

Endoscopic endonasal approach for olfactory groove meningioma resection: Strategies and outcomes in a retrospective case series

OBJECTIVE

Though the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is a widely accepted treatment for skull base tumors, the specific use of EEA for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) is debated, with variable outcomes reported in the literature. We review the surgical results of OGM resections for one surgeon including the operative approach, surgical nuances, and outcomes, with a focus on factors relating to patient selection which favor EEA over transcranial approaches.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed thirteen cases of endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas. Patient characteristics, clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Extent of resection was determined based on volumetric analysis of pre- and postoperative MRI.

RESULTS

Anatomic characteristics that render a tumor difficult to access fully are lateral extension beyond the mid-orbit and anterior extension to the falx. Simpson Grade I resection was achieved in 11/13 (84.6 %) cases. Mean pre-operative tumor volume was 8.99 cm3 (range 2.19-16.79 cm3), and 92 % of tumors were WHO grade I. We demonstrate 2 cases of smell preservation, possible with small unilateral tumors and tumors that are confined to either the anterior or posterior portion of the cribriform plate. The post-operative CSF leak rate was 7.7 %, without prophylactic lumbar CSF drainage. The mortality rate was 7.7 % (n = 1) after infectious complications following CSF leak.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningiomas is an effective and safe operative method with outcomes and complication rates comparable to transcranial approaches. Key considerations include careful patient selection and familiarity with technical nuances of endoscopic endonasal approach for this specific tumor type.

Unilateral Supraorbital Keyhole Craniotomy Avoiding the Frontal Sinus for Large and Giant Olfactory-Groove Meningiomas: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

There are several different approaches to large and giant olfactory-groove meningiomas (OGMs). Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. We present our series using a unilateral supraorbital keyhole approach avoiding the frontal sinus for the resection of large and giant OGMs without the use of fixed brain retractors or orbital rim removal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients operated on for large (>3 cm in largest diameter) and giant (>5 cm) OGMs by the senior author from 2016 to 2021 were prospectively identified and retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were operated on using an endoscopic endonasal approach were excluded. No fixed retraction was used.

RESULTS

In total, 14 consecutive patients (11 with large, 3 with giant) were included. All patients were female, with an average age ± standard deviation of 59.7 ± 11.5 years. The median [interquartile range] preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status score was 80 [80-88]. The median preoperative tumor diameter and volume were 3.8 [3.2-4.2] cm and 22.2 [10.5-25.2] cm3, respectively. All patients underwent gross total resection. The median hospital stay was 2.7 [2-3] days, with all patients being discharged to home. No patients incurred any postoperative medical and/or surgical complications. Of the 9 patients who had subjective smell preoperatively, 5 stated they had subjective olfaction after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate the utility of a unilateral supraorbital keyhole approach avoiding the frontal sinus for large and giant OGMs. The potential advantages of this approach are minimizing bilateral brain manipulation, avoiding the frontal sinus and potential mucoceles, and reducing the risk of cerebrospinal fluid leaks.

The Evolution of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Olfactory Groove Meningiomas

BACKGROUND

There is controversy over the choice of optimal approach for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGM). The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is one of the most recently described corridors, which provides direct access to the tumor base.

OBJECTIVE

To detail the evolution of the endoscopic endonasal technique over the past 2 decades and demonstrate the impact of this evolution on patient outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study based on a prospectively maintained database of consecutive cases of OGM operated on at our institution via EEA. For analysis, the whole cohort has been divided into 3 equal "eras" according to the time period during which the surgery happened, creating early, middle, and contemporary groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were included, 25 in each group. The rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak significantly decreased over time (28%, 32%, and 8% in the early, middle, and contemporary groups, respectively, P = .020). The rate of postoperative encephalomalacia was significantly lower in more recent groups (24%, 16%, and 0% in the early, middle, and contemporary groups, respectively, P = .029), as was the time to resolution of postoperative brain edema (103.9 months, 87.3 months, and 16.8 months in the early, middle, and contemporary groups, respectively, P = .020).

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic endonasal approach for OGM significantly evolved over time, achieving lower cerebrospinal fluid leak rates while providing a high rate of Simpson grade 1 resection. Technical improvements minimized the frontal lobe impact. Current data support EEA as a safe and effective corridor to treat OGM.

Olfactory Groove Meningiomas: Comprehensive assessment between the different microsurgical transcranial approaches and the Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches, systematic review and metanalysis on behalf of the EANS skull base section

•OGM surgery is much more complex than a simple debate of "from above or from below" (transcranial vs endoscopic).•Lateral Sub-frontal and Superior Interhemispheric seem the most effective, superior and versatile approaches for OGM.•Minimally Invasive Transcranial approaches showed no inferiority in OGM sized <4 ​cm.•Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches showed inferior results in surgical and in functional outcomes for OGM.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Brain Contusion and Early Outcomes in Patients with Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas Undergoing Unifrontal Surgery: Single Center Experience with 110 Patients

Background

Though frontal lobe contusion is a major cause for morbidity and prolonged hospitalization following excision of anterior skull base meningiomas, there is only limited literature on this complication. This study aimed to find out the incidence of postoperative frontal lobe contusion, identify the risk factors for its development and its impact on early postoperative outcome.

Methods

Data from 110 patients who underwent excision of anterior skull base meningiomas through a unilateral supraorbital craniotomy from 2001 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors analyzed for development of postoperative contusion were tumor location, size, volume, peritumoral edema, tumor consistency, extent of resection, tumor grade and type of retraction used.

Results

Simpson grade II excision was achieved in ninety-two patients (83.6%). There was no frontal lobe contusion in eighty-two patients (74.5%). Frontal lobe contusion was noted in twenty-eight patients (25.5%), but was severe in only four patients (3.6%). On multivariate analysis, fixed retractor use (OR 11.56 [1.21-110.03]; P =0.03) and WHO grade II tumor (OR 3.29 [1.11-9.77]; P =0.03) were independently associated with postoperative frontal lobe contusion. Patients with higher contusion grade had significantly longer postoperative hospitalization (P =.02) and lower KPS score at discharge (P =.01).

Conclusions

Unilateral supraorbital craniotomy and lateral subfrontal approach is an excellent procedure for excision of anterior skull base meningiomas with minimal postoperative complications related to frontal lobe retraction. Frontal lobe contusion should be avoided with the use of dynamic retraction, since postoperative contusion prolongs hospitalization and worsens the functional outcome at discharge.

Endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for planum sphenoidale versus tuberculum sellae meningiomas

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if the distinction between planum sphenoidale (PS) and tuberculum sellae (TS) meningiomas is clinically meaningful and impacts the results of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA).

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients who were 18 years of age or older and underwent EEA for newly diagnosed grade I PS meningiomas (PSMs) and TS meningiomas (TSMs) between October 2007 and May 2021 were included. The PS and TS were distinguished by drawing a line passing through the center of the TS and perpendicular to the PS on postcontrast T1-weighted MRI. Probabilistic heatmaps were created to display the actual distribution of tumor volumes. Tumor volume, extent of resection (EOR), visual outcome, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

The 47 tumors were distributed in a smooth continuum. Using an arbitrary definition, 24 (51%) were PSMs and 23 (49%) were TSMs. The mean volume of PSMs was 5.6 cm3 compared with 4.5 cm3 for TSMs. Canal invasion was present in 87.5% of PSMs and 52% of TSMs. GTR was achieved in 38 (84%) of 45 cases in which it was the goal, slightly less frequently for PSMs (78%) compared with TSMs (91%), although the difference was not significant. Th mean EOR was 99% ± 2% for PSMs and 98% ± 11% for TSMs. Neither the suprasellar notch angle nor the percentage of tumor above the PS impacted the rate of GTR. After a median follow-up of 28.5 months (range 0.1–131 months), there were 2 (5%) recurrences after GTR (n = 38) both of which occurred in patients with PSMs. Forty-two (89%) patients presented with preoperative impaired vision. Postoperative vision was stable or improved in 96% of patients with PSMs and 91% of patients with TSMs. CSF leakage occurred in 4 (16.6%) patients with a PSM, which resolved with only lumbar drainage, and in 1 (4.3%) patient with a TSM, which required reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

PSM and TSMs arise in a smooth distribution, making the distinction arbitrary. Those classified as PSMs were larger and more likely to invade the optic canals. Surgical outcome for both locations was similar, slightly favoring TSMs. The arbitrary distinction between PSMs and TSMs is less useful at predicting outcome than the lateral extent of the tumor, regardless of the site of origin.

Midline Skull Base Meningiomas: Transcranial and Endonasal Perspectives

Simple Summary

Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. Over time, several corridors have been proposed, each one carrying its own pros and cons. During the last decades, the endoscopic endonasal route has been asserted among the classic routes for a growing number of midline and paramedian lesions. Therefore, the aim of our paper is to present a comprehensive review of the indications and techniques for the management of skull base meningiomas, emphasizing the ambivalent and complementary role of the low and high routes.

Abstract

Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. The state of the art of skull base meningiomas accounts for both transcranial, or high, and endonasal, or low, routes. A comprehensive review of the pertinent literature was performed to address the surgical strategies and outcomes of skull base meningioma patients treated through a transcranial approach, an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), or both. Three databases (PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Ovid Embase) have been searched. The review of the literature provided 328 papers reporting the surgical, oncological, and clinical results of different approaches for the treatment of skull base meningiomas. The most suitable surgical corridors for olfactory groove, tuberculum sellae, clival and petroclival and cavernous sinus meningiomas have been analyzed. The EEA was proven to be associated with a lower extent of resection rates and better clinical outcomes compared with transcranial corridors, offering the possibility of achieving the so-called maximal safe resection.

Olfactory Outcomes after Resection of Tuberculum Sella and Planum Sphenoidale Meningiomas via a Transcranial Approach

Objectives Controversy exists surrounding the optimal approaches to tuberculum sella meningioma (TSM) and planum meningioma (PM). Olfaction is infrequently considered within this context but is nonetheless an important quality of life measure. The evolution of olfactory outcomes following contemporary transcranial surgery remains unclear. This study reviews olfactory outcomes after supraorbital craniotomy for TSM or PM and defines temporal trends in its recovery.

Study Design A prospective study of a patients who underwent a minimally invasive supraorbital craniotomy for TSM or PM was conducted at a single neurosurgical center.

Participants & Main Outcome Measures All patients were questioned about olfaction at presentation 3 months postoperatively, 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter (median follow-up = 37 months). The olfactory status of patients was categorized as normosmia, anosmia, hyposmia, parosmia, (altered perception of odours), or phantosmia, (olfactory hallucinations).

Results Twenty-two patients were included in the study analysis, (range = 27–76). Precisely, 3 months after surgery, seven patients had normal olfaction (32%). Six patients were anosmic, (27%) four hyposmic, (18%), three parosmic, (14%), and two were phantosmic (9%). At 1-year follow-up, almost half of patients (10; 48%) were normosmic, while two patients (9.5%) were anosmic. There were no further improvements in olfaction between 1 year and long-term follow-up.

Conclusion Subfrontal transcranial approaches for TSM or PM appear to be associated with changes in olfaction that can improve with time; these improvements occur within the first year after surgery. Impacts upon olfaction should be considered when selecting a surgical approach and patients counseled appropriately.

Anterior Skull Base Meningioma: Surgical Approach and Complication Avoidance

Introduction  Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) and keyhole transcranial approaches (TCAs) are being increasingly used in anterior skull base meningioma (ASBM) surgery. Objective  We compare tumor resection rates and complication profiles of EEA and supraorbital keyhole approach (SOKHA) with conventional TCAs. Methods  Fifty-four patients with ASBM (olfactory groove meningioma [OGM], n  = 19 and planum sphenoidale/tuberculum sellae meningioma [PSM/TSM], n  = 35) operated at a single center over 7 years were retrospectively analyzed. Results  The overall rate of gross total resection (GTR) was higher in OGM (15/19, 78.9%) than PSM-TSM group (23/35, 65.7%, p  = 0.37). GTR rate with OGM was 90% and 75% with TCA and EEA. Death ( n  = 1) following medical complication (TCA) and cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring re-exploration ( n  = 2, one each in TCA and EEA) accounted for the major complications in OGM. For the PSM/TSM group, the GTR rates were 73.3% ( n  = 11/15), 53.8% ( n  = 7/13), and 71.4% ( n  = 5/7) with TCA, EEA, and SOKHA, respectively. Seven patients (20%) of PSM-TSM developed major postoperative complications including four deaths (one each in TCA and SOKHA, and two in EEA groups) and three visual deteriorations. Direct and indirect vascular complications were common in lesser invasive approaches to PSM-TSM especially if the tumor has encased intracranial arteries. Conclusion  No single approach is applicable to all ASBMs. TCA is still the best approach to obtain GTR but has tissue trauma-related problems. SOKHA may be a good alternative to TCA in selected PSM-TSMs, while EEA may be an alternate option in some OGMs. A meticulous patient selection is needed to derive reported results of EEA for PSM-TSM.

Olfactory function testing before and after anesthesia

This study aimed to determine whether anesthesia would affect olfactory function. Patients who were admitted for surgical intervention that did not include the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses were included in this prospective cohort study. Structured medical history was taken from the patients, including the following: age, sex, smoking history, alcohol intake, current medications, and sleep deficits prior to surgery. Before surgery, patients were asked for a self-rating of their olfactory function. Olfactory function was also measured using Sniffin' Sticks comprising measures of odor threshold, discrimination, and identification. The mean interval between olfactory tests was 6 days (range 3-12 days). Seventy-three patients were included in the study, 34 men and 39 women. Olfactory scores were consistent before and after surgery as indicated by correlative analyses (p < 0.05). Odor thresholds, discrimination, identification, and composite TDI scores did not change significantly, whereas odor identification scores increased (p = 0.011) after surgery. In conclusion, post-operative olfactory scores remained stable. However, identification scores exhibited a slight increase which can be attributed to a retest effect. Overall, the present results indicate that surgery outside of the nasal and paranasal sinus region performed in general anesthesia has no major effect on the sense of smell.

The Suprasellar Meningioma Patient-Reported Outcome Survey: a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for resection of suprasellar meningioma

OBJECTIVE

Suprasellar meningioma resection via either the transcranial approach (TCA) or the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is an area of controversy and active evaluation. Skull base surgeons increasingly consider patient-reported outcomes (PROs) when choosing an approach. No PRO measure currently exists to assess quality of life for suprasellar meningiomas.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing suprasellar meningioma resection between 2013 and 2019 via EEA (n = 14) or TCA (n = 14) underwent semistructured interviews. Transcripts were coded using a grounded theory approach to identify themes as the basis for a PRO measure that includes all uniquely reported symptoms. To assess content validity, 32 patients and 15 surgeons used a Likert scale to rate the relevance of items on the resulting questionnaire and the general Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS29). The mean scores were calculated for all items and compared for TCA versus EEA patient cohorts by using unpaired t-tests. Items on either questionnaire with mean scores ≥ 2.0 from patients were considered meaningful and were aggregated to form the novel Suprasellar Meningioma Patient-Reported Outcome Survey (SMPRO) instrument.

RESULTS

Qualitative analyses resulted in 55 candidate items. Relative to patients who underwent the EEA, those who underwent the TCA reported significantly worse future outlook before surgery (p = 0.01), tiredness from medications 2 weeks after surgery (p = 0.001), and word-finding and memory difficulties 3 months after surgery (p = 0.05 and < 0.001, respectively). The items that patients who received a TCA were most concerned about included medication-induced lethargy after surgery (2.9 ± 1.3), blurry vision before surgery (2.7 ± 1.5), and difficulty reading due to blurry vision before surgery (2.7 ± 2.7). Items that patients who received an EEA were most concerned about included blurry vision before surgery (3.5 ± 1.3), difficulty reading due to blurry vision before surgery (2.4 ± 1.3), and problems with smell postsurgery (2.9 ± 1.3). Although surgeons overall overestimated how concerned patients were about questionnaire items (p < 0.0005), the greatest discrepancies between patient and surgeon relevance scores were for blurry vision pre- and postoperatively (p < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively) and problems with taste postoperatively (p < 0.001). Seventeen meningioma-specific items were considered meaningful, supplementing 8 significant PROMIS29 items to create the novel 25-item SMPRO.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors developed a disease- and approach-specific measure for suprasellar meningiomas to compare quality of life by operative approach. If demonstrated to be reliable and valid in future studies, this instrument may assist patients and providers in choosing a personalized surgical approach.

ABBREVIATIONS

EEA = endoscopic endonasal approach; GTR = gross-total resection; PRO = patient-reported outcome; PROMIS29 = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29; QOL = quality of life; SMPRO = Suprasellar Meningioma Patient-Reported Outcome Survey; TCA = transcranial approach.

Olfactory groove meningioma with a 10-year history of smell loss and olfactory recovery after surgery

A rare cause of olfactory impairment is olfactory groove meningiomas with insidious onset of non-specific symptoms like headache, olfactory dysfunction, psychiatric symptoms such as depression, personality changes, declining cognitive function, visual disturbances or seizures. A common complication of surgery is loss of olfactory function. Still, the preservation of olfactory function should be attempted as olfactory loss often has a severe negative impact on quality of life. This report describes a woman with an olfactory groove meningioma and a 10-year history of olfactory impairment. It includes preoperatively and postoperatively extended olfactory testing, a neurosurgical approach to preserve the olfactory function and postoperative olfactory rehabilitation. After rehabilitation, the patient regained a normal olfactory function, even though the right-sided olfactory nerve could not be preserved during surgery. The case demonstrates the importance of performing neuroimaging in selected patients with olfactory loss and a method for preserving and potentially improving postoperative olfactory function.

Comparison of Three Surgical Approaches for Frontobasal Meningiomas: Purely Endoscopic Endonasal, Purely Microscopic Bifrontal Transcranial, and Combined Endoscopic and Microscopic Supraorbital Transciliary Approaches

ABSTRACT

Surgical removal of frontobasal meningiomas (FBMs) can be achieved using different techniques, including endoscopic, transcranial, and combined approaches. The advantages and disadvantages of the outcomes of these approaches should be compared to provide the most convenient surgical treatment to the patient. This study aimed to compare 3 surgical approaches for FBMsin terms of outcomes and determine the superiority of each on the basis of anatomical, surgical, and clinical efficacy. Systematic review was performed to identify studies comparing techniques for the surgical removal of FBMs. Each group included 13 patients; 39 patients with FBMshad undergone surgery. These groups were endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), microscopic bifrontal transcranial approach (MTA), and endoscopic plus microscopic combined supraorbital transciliary approach (STA) groups. Data on the demographics of patient population, pre- and post-operative neurological examination, tumor properties, imaging studies, and surgical complications were extracted. The mean age at the time of surgery for the patient population was 53.2 years. Among the groups, no statistically significant differences were observed with regard to sex (P = 0.582). The mean follow-up time was 56.7 months. A statistically significant difference was observed in the mean tumor volume among the groups; the MTA group showed the highest mean tumor volume. However, no significant difference was found in the mean tumor volume between EEA and STA groups. Regarding operation duration, the STA group had the shortest operation time (mean = 281.5 minutes), whereas the average surgical duration in MTA group was the longest (mean = 443.8 minutes). The average bleeding volume was highest in the MTA group (mean = 746.2 ml) and lowest in the EEA group (mean = 320.8 ml). Tumor removal was incomplete in three patients (two in the EEA group and one in the MTA group). Recurrence was detected in two cases. One patient with recurrence was operated using the endoscopic surgical approach, whereas the other patient underwent the microscopic bifrontal approach. Post-operative hyposmia/anosmia or decreased olfactory function was the most common complication observed in 5 patients, 2 patients each in the EEA and MTA groups and one in the STA group. The second most common complication was wound infection in one patient in the MTA group and two patients in the STA group (7.7%). Both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and meningitis were present in two patients (5.1%), one patient each from the EEA and STA groups. Pre-operative visual disturbances were reported in 13 patients (33.3%), all of which resolved post-operatively No statistical differences were found among the groups. Mortality occurred in a patient in the MTA group (2.6%) caused by cardiac arrest on post-operative day 1. This is the first study comparing the surgical outcomes of three surgical approaches for FBMs. Although recent literature suggests that both endoscopic and transcranial approaches have their own advantages and disadvantages, the authors showed that none of the surgical approaches have obvious superiority over the others with regard to outcomes. Thus, the selection of the ideal surgical approach should be based on surgical experience and tumor characteristics.

The endoscope-assisted supraorbital "keyhole" approach for anterior skull base meningiomas: an updated meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The gold-standard treatment for symptomatic anterior skull base meningiomas is surgical resection. The endoscope-assisted supraorbital "keyhole" approach (eSKA) is a promising technique for surgical resection of olfactory groove (OGM) and tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) but has yet to be compared with the microscopic transcranial (mTCA) and the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in the context of existing literature.

METHODS

An updated study-level meta-analysis on surgical outcomes and complications of OGM and TSM operated with the eSKA, mTCA, and EEA was conducted using random-effect models.

RESULTS

A total of 2285 articles were screened, yielding 96 studies (2191 TSM and 1510 OGM patients). In terms of effectiveness, gross total resection incidence was highest in mTCA (89.6% TSM, 91.1% OGM), followed by eSKA (85.2% TSM, 84.9% OGM) and EEA (83.9% TSM, 82.8% OGM). Additionally, the EEA group had the highest incidence of visual improvement (81.9% TSM, 54.6% OGM), followed by eSKA (65.9% TSM, 52.9% OGM) and mTCA (63.9% TSM, 45.7% OGM). However, in terms of safety, the EEA possessed the highest cerebrospinal fluid leak incidence (9.2% TSM, 14.5% OGM), compared with eSKA (2.1% TSM, 1.6% OGM) and mTCA (1.6% TSM, 6.5% OGM). Finally, mortality and intraoperative arterial injury were 1% or lower across all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of diverse study populations, the eSKA appeared not to be associated with increased adverse outcomes when compared with mTCA and EEA and offered comparable effectiveness. Case-selection is paramount in establishing a role for the eSKA in anterior skull base tumours.

Meningiomas of the Planum Sphenoidale and Tuberculum Sella

Patients with meningiomas of the planum sphenoidale and tuberculum sella often present with insidious vision loss in one or both eyes as the only sign or symptom of their disease, although other sensory, oculomotor, and even endocrine abnormalities may be seen in a minority of cases. Incidentally discovered tumors also are common, as patients may undergo neuroimaging for unrelated symptoms or events. Depending on the size and orientation of the tumor, central vision loss from optic nerve compression may be a later sign, and loss of peripheral vision in one or both eyes may not be recognized until it has progressed to areas closer to fixation. A thorough neuroophthalmologic assessment including visual field testing will help to define the extent of optic pathway involvement. Both fundus examination and optical coherence tomography of the retinal nerve fiber layer and macular ganglion cell complex will aid in determining prognosis after treatment of the tumor. Orbital surgery rarely is indicated as primary therapy for meningiomas in this location, and surgical resection or debulking is usually pursued before consideration is given to radiation therapy. Because of the long-term risk of residual tumor growth or recurrence, neuroophthalmic surveillance along with serial neuroimaging is required for years after tumor resection and/or radiation therapy.

Eyebrow supraorbital keyhole craniotomy for olfactory groove meningiomas with endoscope assistance: case series and systematic review of extent of resection, quantification of postoperative frontal lobe injury, anosmia, and recurrence

BACKGROUND

Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) are commonly treated with open craniotomy. Endonasal approaches have also been described.

OBJECTIVE

To present clinical and radiographic outcomes for the minimally invasive eyebrow incision supraorbital keyhole approach with endoscopic assistance for OGMs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study and a systematic literature review.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were identified, all with Grade I meningiomas. Radiographic gross total resection of enhancing tumor was achieved in all patients. Mean frontal lobe fluid-attenuated inversion recovery volume decreased from 11.1 ± 18.3 cm³ preoperatively to 9.9 ± 11.4 cm³ immediately postoperatively, and there was minimal new restricted diffusion (3.2 ± 2.2 cm³; max 7.5 cm³). Median length of stay was 3 days (range 2-8). Vision was improved in 4 (80%) and stable in 1 (20%) of 5 patients with a preoperative deficit. New postoperative anosmia occurred in 3 (23%) of 13 patients with any preoperative olfaction. All patients were satisfied with their cosmetic result at 3 months. After a median follow-up of 32.2 months, there were 2 (13.3%) asymptomatic radiographic recurrences, 1 treated with radiosurgery and the other with endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA). No patients required further craniotomy. Systematic review revealed the present series to be the largest to date reporting disaggregated outcomes for the eyebrow approach to OGM.

CONCLUSION

The eyebrow incision supraorbital keyhole craniotomy with endoscopic assistance is a safe and effective approach to OGM with tumor control rates similar to more invasive open approaches and better than the endonasal approach. Rates of frontal lobe injury, CSF leak and anosmia are comparatively low.

Endoscopic endonasal surgery for anterior cranial fossa meningiomas

Meningiomas along the anterior skull base arise from the midline but have historically been resected via open cranial approaches with lateral to medial trajectories. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) offers a direct, inferomedial approach which has demonstrated several superior qualities for their resection. These meningiomas include tuberculum sellae, planum sphenoidale, and olfactory groove meningiomas. While early gross total resection (GTR) was lower than open approaches, EEA has currently achieved comparable rates of GTR and significantly improved postoperative visual outcomes. Rate of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was one of the early complicating features preventing widespread use of EEA. However, CSF leak rates have dramatically fallen into a tolerable range with introduction of the vascularized nasoseptal flap. Olfactory groove meningiomas often present with anosmia which is persistent after endonasal approach. Rates of other complications have proven similar between EEA and open approaches and include: vascular injury, infection, morbidity, and mortality. With the appropriate team and experience, EEA for anterior skull base meningiomas is increasingly becoming the standard for resection of these lesions. However, there are certain anatomic considerations, patient features, and other aspects which may favor the open approach over EEA, and vice versa; these must be carefully and judiciously evaluated preoperatively. Overall, resection and recurrence rates are comparable, complication rates fall within a very acceptable range, and patients experience superior cosmesis and improved visual outcome with this approach.

Results of Transcranial Resection of Olfactory Groove Meningiomas in Relation to Imaging-Based Case Selection Criteria for the Endoscopic Approach

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) is increasingly used for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). The role of EES for large (≥4 cm) or complex OGMs is debated. Specific imaging features have been reported to affect the degree of gross total resection (GTR) and complications following EES for OGMs. The influence of these factors on transcranial resection (TCR) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of specific imaging features on outcome following TCR to provide a standard for large and endoscopically less favorable OGMs against which endoscopic outcomes can be compared.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients undergoing TCR for OGMs 2002 to 2016.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (mean age 62.1 yr, mean maximum tumor diameter 5.04 cm and average tumor volume of 48.8 cm3) were studied. Simpson grade 1 and 2 resections were achieved in 80% and 12%, respectively. A favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) was attained in 86%. The degree of resection, mRS, mortality (4%), recurrence (6%), infection (8%), and cerebrospinal fluid leak requiring intervention (12%) were not associated with tumor calcification, absence of cortical cuff, T2 hyperintensity, tumor configuration, tumor extension beyond midpoint of superior orbital roof, or extension to posterior wall of frontal sinus. There was no difference in resection rates but a trend towards greater complications between 3 arbitrarily divided groups of large meningiomas of increasing complexity based on extensive extension or vascular adherence.

CONCLUSION

Favorable outcomes can be achieved with TCR for large and complex OGMs Factors that may preclude endoscopic resection do not negatively affect outcome following TCR.

Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic endonasal vs transcranial approaches for olfactory groove meningioma

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) have been adopted as an alternative to standard transcranial approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). However, the relative cost-effectiveness remains controversial.

METHODS

Cost-utility analysis from a societal perspective comparing EEA vs transcranial approaches for OGM was used in this study. Surgical treatment was modeled using decision analysis, and a Markov model was adopted over a 20-year horizon. Parameters were obtained from literature review. Costs were expressed in 2017 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

In the base case, EEA was cost-effective compared with transcranial surgery with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $33 523 ($30 475 USD)/QALY. There was a 55% likelihood that EEA was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of $50 000/QALY. EEA remained cost-effective at a cerebrospinal fluid leak rate below 60%, gross total resection rate above 25%, and base cost less than $66 174 ($60 158 USD).

CONCLUSION

EEA may be a cost-effective alternative to transcranial approaches for selected OGM.

TRANS-FRONTAL SINUS APPROACH FOR OLFACTORY GROOVE MENINGIOMAS: A 19 YEAR EXPERIENCE

INTRODUCTION

Olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs) account for 8-13 % of all intracranial meningiomas. The gold standard of treatment is generally surgery, however various approaches have been used and the literature is still uncertain about the superiority of one treatment over the others. The most debated techniques are traditional microscopic open approaches versus the endoscopic endonasal ones. The aim of this paper is to prove a valid surgical route that gathers the benefits of both endoscopic and transcranial routes.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients underwent trans-frontal sinus surgical removal of an OGM between January 2000 and January 2019 at the Neurosurgical Departments in Torino, Brescia and Legnano (Italy). The clinical features were collected in a database and compared with neuroimaging and outcomes. All patients were investigated with neuroimaging techniques. Clinical evaluations were performed 3-4 months and 1 year after surgery, together with neuroradiological follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients with OGM underwent Simpson grade I resection. The most common neurological symptom leading to neuroradiological evaluations were headaches (36 %), followed by behavioural changes (30 %), hyposmia/anosmia (12 %), visual impairments (6%) and focal deficits (6%). At 3-4 months follow-up 48 patients underwent a brain MRI (2 patients underwent a brain CT), and a complete resection was confirmed in 45 patients (94 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite different techniques and studies supported by good evidence, there is no consensus on the best surgical approach for OGMs. The data shown in this article suggests that the trans-frontal sinus approach is a valid alternative to an endoscopic approach and the classical transcranial routes, collecting benefits from both approaches.

Efficacy of simultaneous pericranial and nasoseptal "double flap" reconstruction of anterior skull base defects after combined transbasal and endoscopic endonasal approaches

BACKGROUND

The "double flap" reconstruction technique, comprised of a simultaneous vascularized pedicled pericranial flap (PCF) and pedicled nasoseptal flap (NSF), can be used to repair anterior skull base defects after a combined cranionasal or transbasal-endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been performed to remove malignant anterior skull base tumors. The use of two vascularized flaps may potentially decrease the incidence of post-radiation flap necrosis and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks after radiation therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of a prospective skull base database on patients who underwent the double flap reconstruction technique after a combined transbasal-EEA approach. Data collected for each patient included demographics, method of tumor resection and repair, complications, tumor recurrence, and follow-up.

RESULTS

Nine patients who underwent a combined transbasal-EEA approach for resection of anterior skull base tumors with significant intracranial extension followed by reconstruction of the cranial base using the double flap technique. Four were men and five were women, with a mean age of 49 years (range, 15-68 years). There was no postoperative CSF leakage detected or complications of infection, meningitis, mucocele, or tension pneumocephalus after a mean follow-up of 35.7 months (range, 4.5-98 months). Seven of the nine patients underwent adjuvant radiation without flap necrosis. Local tumor recurrence was not observed in any of the patients at last follow-up; however, one patient developed distant brain metastasis.

CONCLUSION

The simultaneous PCF and NSF double flap reconstruction is an effective technique in preventing postoperative CSF leakage and post-radiation necrosis when repairing anterior skull base defects after combined transbasal-EEA approaches. This technique may be useful in patients anticipated to undergo postoperative radiation therapy.

Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approach to resection of olfactory groove meningiomas: a systematic review

Despite the increasing utility of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for management of anterior skull base (ASB) pathologies, the optimal treatment strategy for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGM) remains unclear. This project sought to systematically compare outcomes of EEA management with conventional transcranial approach (TCA) for the treatment of OGMs. A systematic review was performed to identify studies that compared outcomes following EEA and TCA for OGMs. Data extracted from each study included gross total resection (GTR), incidence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, and post-operative complications including anosmia. The results of the search yielded 5 studies which met the criteria for inclusion and analysis. All studies compared TCA (n = 922) with EEA (n = 141) outcomes for OGMs. Overall, the rate of gross total resection (GTR) was lower among the endoscopic group (70.9%) relative to the transcranial group (91.5%). The rate of post-operative CSF leak was 6.3% vs. 25.5% for the transcranial and endoscopic groups, respectively. Post-operative anosmia was higher for patients undergoing EEA (95.9%) compared with patients in the transcranial group (37.4%). In this analysis, EEA was associated with a lower rate of GTR and higher incidences of CSF leaks and post-operative anosmia. However, with increasing surgeon familiarity of the endoscopic anatomy and technique for managing ASB pathologies, a nuanced approach may be used to minimize patient morbidity and widen the spectrum of skull base surgery.

Transbasal versus endoscopic endonasal versus combined approaches for olfactory groove meningiomas: importance of approach selection

OBJECTIVE There has been much debate regarding the optimal surgical approach for resecting olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). In this paper, the authors analyzed the factors involved in approach selection and reviewed the surgical outcomes in a series of OGMs. METHODS A retrospective review of 28 consecutive OGMs from a prospective database was conducted. Each tumor was treated via one of 3 approaches: transbasal approach (n = 15), pure endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA; n = 5), and combined (endoscope-assisted) transbasal-EEA (n = 8). RESULTS The mean tumor volume was greatest in the transbasal (92.02 cm³) and combined (101.15 cm³) groups. Both groups had significant lateral dural extension over the orbits (transbasal 73.3%, p < 0.001; combined 100%), while the transbasal group had the most cerebral edema (73.3%, p < 0.001) and vascular involvement (66.7%, p < 0.001), and the least presence of a cortical cuff (33.3%, p = 0.019). All tumors in the combined group were recurrent tumors that invaded into the sinonasal cavity. The purely EEA group had the smallest mean tumor volume (33.33 cm³), all with a cortical cuff and no lateral dural extension. Gross-total resection was achieved in 80% of transbasal, 100% of EEA, and 62.5% of combined cases. Near-total resection (> 95%) was achieved in 20% of transbasal and 37.5% of combined cases, all due to tumor adherence to the critical neurovascular structures. The rate of CSF leakage was 0% in the transbasal and combined groups, and there was 1 leak in the EEA group (20%), resulting in an overall CSF leakage rate of 3.6%. Olfaction was preserved in 66.7% in the transbasal group. There was no significant difference in length of stay or 30-day readmission rate between the 3 groups. The mean modified Rankin Scale score was 0.79 after the transbasal approach, 2.0 after EEA, and 2.4 after the combined approach (p = 0.0604). The mean follow-up was 14.5 months (range 1-76 months). CONCLUSIONS The transbasal approach provided the best clinical outcomes with the lowest rate of complications for large tumors (> 40 mm) and for smaller tumors (< 40 mm) with intact olfaction. The role of EEA appears to be limited to smaller, appropriately selected tumors in which olfaction is already absent. EEA also plays an important adjunctive role when combined with the transbasal approach for recurrent OGMs invading the sinonasal cavity. Careful patient selection using an individualized, tailored strategy is important to optimize surgical outcomes.

Orbitocranial Approaches to the Skull Base

There are a myriad of approaches and surgical options for removal and treatment of skull base diseases. While, historically, large open approaches have been preferred, several endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques are now available that preserve intraoperative visualization and surgical success while minimizing morbidity and recovery times. Herein, the authors review common open, minimally invasive, and endoscopic approaches to the anterior skull base.

Septal Flip Flap for Anterior Skull Base Reconstruction After Endoscopic Transnasal Craniectomy: Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic endonasal anterior skull base malignant sinonasal tumor resection and reconstruction remains a challenge. We describe our septal flip flap (SFF) reconstruction, a new surgical technique for repairing anterior skull base defects and report our outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 24 patients who underwent skull base reconstruction using a SFF following endoscopic resection with transnasal craniectomy. We raise the SFF from the contralateral nasal septum based on the septal branches of the anterior and posterior ethmoidal arteries; the SFF is then rotated laterally for anterior skull base reconstruction after transnasal resection with craniectomy.

RESULTS

The SFF was used for multiple tumor types including, most commonly, intestinal-type adenocarcinoma, followed by olfactory neuroblastoma, squamous cell carcinoma, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, and other types. All of the cases had either preoperative or postoperative radiation therapy. All flaps remained viable postoperatively. Postoperatively, nasal crusting was significantly reduced with faster healing of the surgical cavity.

CONCLUSIONS

The SFF adds to the clinical armamentarium the opportunity to provide vascularized mucosal coverage extending from the frontal recess back to the planum sphenoidalis. The use of SFF requires careful consideration when dealing with paranasal sinus cancers so as not to infringe oncologic principles.

[Transsphenoidal surgery of suprasellar meningiomas - is there a future for the technique?]

Surgery of suprasellar meningiomas is a challenge and associated with a high risk of injury to the vascular-neural structures lying along the approach and surrounding the tumor. Currently, many foreign clinics and our Center have introduced a technique for resection of suprasellar meningiomas through the anterior extended transsphenoidal endoscopic endonasal approach.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to evaluate the role of extended transsphenoidal endoscopic endonasal approaches in surgery of suprasellar meningiomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present study is a retrospective analysis of surgical treatment outcomes in 45 patients (11 males and 34 females aged 23 to 70 years (median, 50 years) with suprasellar meningiomas who underwent surgery for skull base tumors using the anterior extended transsphenoidal endoscopic endonasal approach in the Surgery Department of the Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute in the period from 2009 to 2017. In all cases, surgery was the primary method of treatment.

RESULTS

Total tumor resection (the tumor was resected completely together with an infiltrated DM - Simpson 1) was achieved in 77.8% (35/45) of cases; subtotal resection (more than 80% of the tumor was removed) was in 17.8% (8/45) of cases; in 4.4% (2/45) of cases, resection was partial (less than 80% of the tumor was resected). Worsening or development of visual impairments immediately after surgery occurred in 13 (28%) of 45 patients. In 3 of them, vision was completely recovered on conservative treatment by the time of hospital discharge. In 4 patients, vision partially improved by the time of discharge. In 6 patients, vision was not recovered by discharge (in 2 of them, vision partially improved during follow-up). Therefore, by the time of hospital discharge, deterioration in vision occurred in 10 (22%) of 45 patients. In 7 (21.2%) out of 33 patients who had visual impairments before surgery, there was an improvement in vision in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

Analyzing the findings and generalizing our experience, we may say that, in surgery of suprasellar meningiomas, the anterior extended transsphenoidal endoscopic endonasal approach should be used for relatively small (up to 3 cm), medially located symmetrical tumors that do not involve large vessels. The efficacy of this technique for tumors extending into the optic nerve canals requires additional analysis in a larger series of cases.

Olfactory groove and tuberculum sellae meningioma resection by endoscopic endonasal approach versus transcranial approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

Intracranial meningiomas such as olfactory groove meningioma (OGM) and tuberculum sellae meningioma (TSM) arising at the anterior skull base are amenable to surgical resection. Traditionally, this has been achieved by transcranial approaches (TCAs), however, there has been an evolution in an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) within recent years. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if the EEA was superior to the TCA in managing these anterior skull base meningioma based on comparative studies only, and highlight the limitations of the current literature. Searches of seven electronic databases from inception to April 2018 were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. There were 1479 articles identified for screening. Data were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis of proportions. A total of 10 comparative studies satisfied criteria for inclusions. Resection by the EEA resulted in significantly less likelihood of worse vision (OR, 0.318; p = 0.039) when compared to TCA in OGM. However, EEA resulted also in significantly greater likelihoods of olfactory loss in OGM (OR, 4.511; p = 0.038) and TSM (OR, 3.075; p = 0.017), and CSF leak (OR, 3.854; p = 0.013) in TSM. In terms of surgical and prognosis outcomes, there was no statistically significant trend in favor of either approach in OGM or TSM. The EEA appears to confer a different postoperative complication profile when compared to the TCA in resecting OGM vs TSM which validates previous case-series comparisons. There is a need for longer-term studies that are larger, prospective, randomized in order to fully elucidate efficacy given slow tendency for progression of meningioma in order to develop a more rigorous approach selection algorithm.

The Endoscopic Endonasal Management of Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas

Introduction  The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) might seem an "unnatural" route for intradural lesions such as meningiomas. The aim of this study is to critically revise our management of anterior skull base meningiomas to consider, in what cases it may be advantageous. Material and Methods  Each consecutive case of anterior skull base meningioma operated on through an EEA or combined endoscopic-transcranial approach at our institution, between 2003 and 2017, have been included. Tumors were classified on the basis of their location and intra or extracranial extension. Follow-up consisted of an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and a clinical examination 3 months after the surgery and then repeated annually. Results  Fifty-seven patients were included. The most common location was the tuberculum sellae (62%), followed by olfactory groove (14%), planum sphenoidale (12%), and frontal sinus (12%). Among these, 65% were intracranial, 7% were extracranial, and 28% both intra and extracranial. Radical removal was achieved in 44 cases (77%). Complications consisted in 10 CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) leaks (17.6%), 1 overpacking (1.7%), and 1 asymptomatic brain ischemia (1.7%). Visual acuity and campimetric deficits improved respectively in 67 and 76% of patients. Recurrence rate was of 14%. Conclusions  EEA presents many advantages in selected cases of anterior skull base meningioma. However, it is hampered by the relevant risk of CSF leak. We consider that it could be advantageous for planum/tuberculum sellae tumors. Conversely, for olfactory groove or frontal sinus meningiomas, it can be indicated for tumors with extracranial extension, while its role is still debatable for purely intracranial forms as considering our surgical results, it could be advantageous for midline planum/tuberculum sellae tumors. Conversely, it can be of first choice for olfactory groove or frontal sinus meningiomas with extracranial extension, while its role for purely intracranial forms is still debatable.