1
|
Strober WA, Valappil B, Snyderman CH. Impact of Reverse Septal Flap on Morbidity of Nasoseptal Flap Reconstruction of Skull Base Defects. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2023:19458924231166801. [PMID: 36991310 DOI: 10.1177/19458924231166801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The workhorse for endonasal reconstruction of skull base defects is the posteriorly-based nasoseptal flap (NSF). Postoperative nasal deformities and decreased olfaction are potential complications of NSF. The reverse septal flap (RSF) minimizes the donor site morbidity of the NSF by covering the exposed cartilage of the anterior septum. Currently, there are minimal data examining its effect on outcomes including nasal dorsum collapse and olfaction. OBJECTIVE Our study aims to clarify whether the RSF should be utilized when the option exists. METHODS Adult patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) surgery of the skull base (transsellar/transplanum/transclival approaches) with NSF reconstruction were identified. Data from 2 separate cohorts, one retrospective and one prospective, were collected. Follow-up was at least 6 months. Patients were photographed preoperatively and postoperatively using standard rhinoplastic nasal views. Patients completed the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) and the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) preoperatively and postoperatively and were also queried regarding subjective changes in nasal appearance and plans for cosmetic surgery following EEA. RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in the change in UPSIT and SNOT-22 scores between patients receiving RSF and other reconstructive groups (either NSF without RSF or no NSF). One of 25 patients who were reconstructed with an NSF with RSF reported a change in nasal appearance; none were considering reconstructive surgery. The proportion of patients reporting changes in appearance was significantly lower in the NSF with RSF group as compared to the NSF without RSF group (P = .012). CONCLUSION The use of an RSF to limit donor site morbidity of the NSF was shown to significantly decrease the proportion of patients who reported nasal deformities and did not show a significant difference in patient-reported sinonasal outcomes. Given these findings, RSF should be considered whenever an NSF is used for reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A Strober
- 12317University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Benita Valappil
- Department of Otolaryngology, 12317University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, 12317University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palmieri D, Champagne PO, Valappil B, McDowell MM, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. Risk Factors in a Pediatric Population for Postoperative Intracranial Infection Following Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery and the Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2022; 37:13-18. [PMID: 36050937 DOI: 10.1177/19458924221123113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) is performed through a non-sterile corridor. Intracranial infection rates in a pediatric population have not been extensively studied and the exact effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on rates of infection after EESBS in pediatric patients remains unclear. OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study is to investigate risk factors for postoperative intracranial infection during EESBS in a pediatric population and help elucidate the role of antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of 99 consecutive patients under the age of 18 who underwent EESBS at our institution from 2013 to 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network criteria for diagnosis of meningitis were used to identify postoperative intracranial infections. RESULTS The average age was 12.3 years (range 1.6-18) with 66 male patients and 33 female patients. 49 patients had an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, of which 4 had a postoperative CSF leak. We identified 3 postoperative intracranial infections (3%), which were all meningitis cases. The infection rate was 6% (3/49) among those with intraoperative CSF leaks. All patients with meningitis had a postoperative CSF leak. All infections were transclival approaches (2 chordoma and 1 neurenteric cyst). CONCLUSION This investigation represents one of the largest pediatric endoscopic skull base surgery cohorts. EESBS is safe to perform in pediatric populations, but transclival approaches and postoperative CSF leaks are risk factors for postoperative meningitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Palmieri
- 12317University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Pierre-Olivier Champagne
- Department of Neurological Surgery, 12317University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Benita Valappil
- Department of Otolaryngology, 12317University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael M McDowell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, 12317University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, 12317University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, 12317University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McDowell MM, Jacobs RC, Valappil B, Abou-Al-Shaar H, Zenonos GA, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA. Dural Sealants Do Not Reduce Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak after Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 83:589-593. [PMID: 36393876 PMCID: PMC9653287 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction The application of cranial tissue sealants to assist with postoperative closure is widespread, but data are lacking regarding its utility in endoscopic endonasal surgery (EEA). A prospective study was conducted to assess the effect of sealant usage on postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rate following standard reconstruction.
Methods A prospective trial of sealant usage after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery was performed from May 2016 to June 2019 at a tertiary referral cranial base center. This study enrolled 300 consecutive adult and pediatric patients with skull base pathology who underwent EES in which an intraoperative CSF leak occurred. Patients were sequentially stratified into equally sized groups who did or did not receive sealant as part of their reconstruction.
Results Three hundred consecutive adult and pediatric patients were enrolled in the study and had a confirmed intraoperative CSF leak. The intervention cohort with sealant (first 150 patients) had 21 postoperative CSF leaks (14% rate) compared with 9 postoperative CSF leaks (6% rate) in the control group without sealant (p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, sealant usage was associated with a higher rate of postoperative CSF leak (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7; p = 0.025). Male gender (OR = 2.4; p = 0.04) and high-flow intraoperative CSF leak (OR = 3.1; p = 0.038) were also found to be associated with postoperative CSF leak.
Conclusion Among all patients undergoing EES with an intraoperative CSF leak, the addition of sealant to standard closure techniques did not reduce the rate of postoperative CSF leaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael M. McDowell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Rachel C. Jacobs
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Benita Valappil
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Georgios A. Zenonos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Eric W. Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Carl H. Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Paul A. Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khalafallah AM, Rakovec M, Burapachaisri K, Fung S, Kozachik SL, Valappil B, Abou-Al-Shaar H, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Zenonos GA, Gardner PA, Baskaya MK, Dornbos D, Choby G, Kuan EC, Roxbury C, Overdevest JB, Gudis DA, Lee VS, Levy JM, Thamboo A, Schlosser RJ, Huang J, Bettegowda C, London NR, Rowan NR, Wu AW, Mukherjee D. The Suprasellar Meningioma Patient-Reported Outcome Survey: a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for resection of suprasellar meningioma. J Neurosurg 2021:1-9. [PMID: 34874673 DOI: 10.3171/2021.6.jns21517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Suprasellar meningioma resection via either the transcranial approach (TCA) or the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is an area of controversy and active evaluation. Skull base surgeons increasingly consider patient-reported outcomes (PROs) when choosing an approach. No PRO measure currently exists to assess quality of life for suprasellar meningiomas. METHODS Adult patients undergoing suprasellar meningioma resection between 2013 and 2019 via EEA (n = 14) or TCA (n = 14) underwent semistructured interviews. Transcripts were coded using a grounded theory approach to identify themes as the basis for a PRO measure that includes all uniquely reported symptoms. To assess content validity, 32 patients and 15 surgeons used a Likert scale to rate the relevance of items on the resulting questionnaire and the general Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS29). The mean scores were calculated for all items and compared for TCA versus EEA patient cohorts by using unpaired t-tests. Items on either questionnaire with mean scores ≥ 2.0 from patients were considered meaningful and were aggregated to form the novel Suprasellar Meningioma Patient-Reported Outcome Survey (SMPRO) instrument. RESULTS Qualitative analyses resulted in 55 candidate items. Relative to patients who underwent the EEA, those who underwent the TCA reported significantly worse future outlook before surgery (p = 0.01), tiredness from medications 2 weeks after surgery (p = 0.001), and word-finding and memory difficulties 3 months after surgery (p = 0.05 and < 0.001, respectively). The items that patients who received a TCA were most concerned about included medication-induced lethargy after surgery (2.9 ± 1.3), blurry vision before surgery (2.7 ± 1.5), and difficulty reading due to blurry vision before surgery (2.7 ± 2.7). Items that patients who received an EEA were most concerned about included blurry vision before surgery (3.5 ± 1.3), difficulty reading due to blurry vision before surgery (2.4 ± 1.3), and problems with smell postsurgery (2.9 ± 1.3). Although surgeons overall overestimated how concerned patients were about questionnaire items (p < 0.0005), the greatest discrepancies between patient and surgeon relevance scores were for blurry vision pre- and postoperatively (p < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively) and problems with taste postoperatively (p < 0.001). Seventeen meningioma-specific items were considered meaningful, supplementing 8 significant PROMIS29 items to create the novel 25-item SMPRO. CONCLUSIONS The authors developed a disease- and approach-specific measure for suprasellar meningiomas to compare quality of life by operative approach. If demonstrated to be reliable and valid in future studies, this instrument may assist patients and providers in choosing a personalized surgical approach. ABBREVIATIONS EEA = endoscopic endonasal approach; GTR = gross-total resection; PRO = patient-reported outcome; PROMIS29 = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29; QOL = quality of life; SMPRO = Suprasellar Meningioma Patient-Reported Outcome Survey; TCA = transcranial approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maureen Rakovec
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | | | - Shirley Fung
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sharon L. Kozachik
- Medical University of South Carolina College of Nursing, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Benita Valappil
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
| | - Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric W. Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
| | - Carl H. Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
| | - Georgios A. Zenonos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Paul A. Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mustafa K. Baskaya
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Wisconsin–Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - David Dornbos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Garrett Choby
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Edward C. Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Christopher Roxbury
- Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jonathan B. Overdevest
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - David A. Gudis
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois
| | - Victoria S. Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joshua M. Levy
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Anterior Skull Base, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Andrew Thamboo
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Rodney J, Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Judy Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Nyall R. London
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nicholas R. Rowan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Albert W. Wu
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Debraj Mukherjee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khalafallah A, Fung S, Kozachik S, Valappil B, Shaar HAA, Wang E, Zenonos G, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Gallia G, Rowan N, Mukherjee D. QOLP-15. QUALITATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENTIAL QUALITY OF LIFE (QOL) IN SUPRASELLAR MENINGIOMA PATIENTS TREATED VIA ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL APPROACH VERSUS OPEN CRANIOTOMY. Neuro Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The optimal surgical treatment of suprasellar meningiomas remains controversial. While successful surgery has historically been measured by extent of tumor resection (EOR), surgeons must also balance tumor- and patient-specific characteristics with quality of life (QoL) outcomes when considering either an open craniotomy or endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA).
METHODS
We conducted 28 in-depth individual interviews with patients diagnosed with suprasellar meningioma and treated via EEA (n=14) or craniotomy (n=14). We used a structured interview script and the transcribed interviews were independently coded by two researchers. Consensus was used to identify themes and domains of interest.
RESULTS
The overall sample (80% between 40-69 years old, 70% female, and 82% white) was largely similar between craniotomy and EEA cohorts. Tumor volumes were not different between both cohorts (p=0.2), with a combined average of 4.4 cm3 (standard error ± 0.7). Suprasellar meningiomas caused a wide range of symptoms with 21 concepts elicited. The most frequently endorsed concepts were “Vision” (n=22), “Headaches” (n=11), “Fatigue” (n=11), “Cognitive Symptoms” (n=10), “Pituitary Dysfunction – including Trouble Sleeping and Frequent Urination” (n=9), “Sinus Problems” (n=7), and “Personality Changes” (5). Both surgical approaches demonstrated improvements in vision (69.2% EEA, 66.7% craniotomy) and headaches (100% EEA, 80% craniotomy). Compared to EEA, craniotomy yielded a longer list of complications (3 vs.14) and surgery-specific symptoms (9 vs.16). More craniotomy patients reported having negative emotions (5 vs.1), new depression and anxiety (6 vs.1), financial difficulties (3 vs.1), and reduced desire/ability to pursue fun activities (12 vs.7) after surgery relative to EEA counterparts.
CONCLUSION
Suprasellar meningiomas can be debilitating with significantly impact on patients’ health and QoL. Our findings demonstrate differential effects upon patients’ post-operative QoL associated with type of surgery. Our findings support the need for measuring patient-centered, disease-specific QoL outcomes in patients undergoing craniotomy versus EEA for suprasellar meningioma resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shirley Fung
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sharon Kozachik
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gary Gallia
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas Rowan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chou CT, Valappil B, Mattos JL, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW. The Effect of Nasoseptal Flap Elevation on Post-Operative Olfaction and Sinonasal Quality of Life: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2020; 35:353-360. [PMID: 32921136 DOI: 10.1177/1945892420957505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of nasoseptal flaps (NSF) for defect reconstruction in endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to cranial base pathology has markedly reduced rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak. However, the effect of NSF use on post-operative olfaction remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of NSF use during EEA on binarial and uninarial olfaction, and sinonasal quality of life (QOL). METHODS This was a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing EEA for sellar pathology were recruited from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from December 2014 to May 2017. Subjects were randomized pre-operatively to a side of NSF harvest. Olfaction and QOL were assessed pre-operatively and 6 to 12 months post-operatively using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test, "Sniffin' Sticks," and Sinonasal Outcomes Test 22. The side of dominant uninarial olfaction was determined using "Sniffin' Sticks." RESULTS Thirty-one patients were enrolled. Sixteen underwent EEA without NSF (control group) and 15 with NSF. A dominant side of olfaction was identified in 14 patients with NSF; 8 patients were randomized to NSF harvest on the dominant side and the remaining 6 on the non-dominant side. NSF elevation resulted in a 4% decrease in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test scores, but was not statistically significant compared to controls. Similarly, NSF elevation on the side of dominant olfaction resulted in a 6% decrease, but was not statistically significant when compared to the non-dominant elevation group. Change in rhinologic QOL as determined by the Sinonasal Outcomes Test 22 was not significantly different between any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS The use of NSF during EEA for sellar pathology does not have a significant effect on olfaction or rhinologic QOL. The presence of a dominant side of olfaction is not a primary consideration when deciding the side of NSF harvest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney T Chou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Benita Valappil
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jose L Mattos
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Snyderman CH, Gardner PA, Wang EW, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Valappil B. Experience With the Endoscopic Contralateral Transmaxillary Approach to the Petroclival Skull Base. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:294-298. [PMID: 32413156 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS The contralateral transmaxillary (CTM) approach is a new surgical approach that improves the surgical trajectory relative to the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Here, we present our clinical experience with the CTM approach to the petroclival region of the skull base. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. METHODS A retrospective review of 29 patients who underwent a CTM approach for skull base pathology from 2015 to 2020 was performed. Assessment of gross total resection (GTR) was based on postoperative imaging. RESULTS The male:female ratio was 15:14, with an average age of 52 years (range = 19-78 years). Diagnoses included: 12 chondrosarcomas, 11 chordomas, two meningiomas, one schwannoma, one metastasis, one petrous apicitis, and one arachnoid cyst. CTM was performed in addition to a transclival approach and ipsilateral transpterygoid approach in all patients. Reconstruction of surgical defects included a vascularized flap in all but two patients: 24 nasoseptal flaps and three lateral nasal wall flaps. The reconstructive flap was on the same side as the CTM approach in 22 of 28 (79%) patients. There were no ICA injuries. In a subset of patients with chondromatous tumors, GTR of the targeted area was achieved in 16 of 22 (73%) evaluable chondromatous tumors. With a median follow-up of 13 months, 64% of these patients are without disease or dead of other causes; the remainder are alive with disease. CONCLUSIONS The CTM approach improves the degree of resection of skull base tumors involving the petroclival region using an endoscopic endonasal approach and may minimize risk to the ICA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 131:294-298, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl H Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.,Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.,Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Juan C Fernandez-Miranda
- Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Benita Valappil
- Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Melachuri S, Valappil B, Snyderman C. Variations in Surgical Outcomes of Carotid Body Tumors by Surgical Specialty. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:E190-E195. [PMID: 32311766 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS A carotid body tumor (CBT) is a rare type of tumor that is divided among multiple surgical specialties. Individual surgeons may have limited experience in treating these tumors. We aim to compare different surgical specialties within a single healthcare system to detect variations in management and outcome. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective chart review. METHODS A chart review of all patients who underwent surgery for CBT at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) from 2000 to 2019 was carried out. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used for descriptive statistics, comparison of outcomes, and identification of risk factors. RESULTS Fifty-eight CBT resection surgeries were performed at UPMC. Patients with advanced tumor were 6.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-32.7) times more likely to undergo preoperative embolization and 8.53 (95% CI: 2.011-36.19) times more likely to sustain carotid artery injury. Advanced-stage tumor resections were associated with greater blood loss (P = .03) and longer hospitalization (P = .02). Collaborative surgeries were associated with higher rates of carotid artery injury (P = .003), residual tumor (P < .001), and longer hospitalization (P = .003), as these combined cases were generally reserved for advanced-stage tumors (P = .02). There were no differences in outcomes between specialties. Of 22 surgeons, the median number of surgeries per surgeon was one (range = 1-12, 54.5%). CONCLUSIONS Surgeons who completed only one surgery for CBT had a greater rate of hospital readmission and greater length of hospital stay. Collaborative surgeries had worse outcomes due to more advanced tumors requiring more complex surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E190-E195, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samyuktha Melachuri
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Benita Valappil
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Carl Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rowan NR, Valappil B, Chen J, Wang EW, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. Prospective characterization of postoperative nasal deformities in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull-base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 10:256-264. [PMID: 31665569 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 09/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeons have become increasingly aware of the impact of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) of the skull base on sinonasal-related quality of life. Prior retrospective investigation described a correlation between nasoseptal flap (NSF) reconstruction in EES with postoperative nasal deformities, such as nasal dorsum collapse. The primary objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the incidence of, and contributing factors to, postoperative changes in nasal structure following EES. Secondary goals included assessing subjective changes in nasal appearance as well as objective nasal analysis. METHODS Clinical demographics and detailed perioperative information was prospectively collected for patients undergoing transsellar/suprasellar EES for skull-base tumors. Preoperatively, 1-month and 6-month photographs were completed for objective photographic nasal analysis and blinded assessment by surgeons. Subjective patient feedback was also solicited. RESULTS Overall, 14.7% (5/34) of patients subjectively reported postoperative nasal deformities, whereas both blinded-surgeon and objective nasal measurements identified deformities in 12.9% (4/31) of patients. Patients with postoperative deformities were more likely to have skull-base reconstruction with an NSF (p = 0.01) and trended toward an increased incidence in patients with nonpituitary neoplasms (p = 0.07). There were no other associations between clinical or operative characteristics and external deformities. No patients planned to undergo corrective repair. CONCLUSION External nasal deformities following EES are more frequent than previously acknowledged. Postoperative deformities appear to be associated with NSF reconstruction and may be associated with surgery for nonpituitary neoplasms. Patients should be counseled on this potential outcome, and future studies should investigate how to minimize postoperative sequela.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas R Rowan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Benita Valappil
- Department of Otolaryngology, Eye & Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jonlin Chen
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Eye & Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, Eye & Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nakassa A, Geltzeiler M, Valappil B, Chang YF, Zenonos G, Wang E, Fernandez-Miranda J, Snyderman C, Gardner P. Use of Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Endoscopy in the Assessment of Vascularity of Intranasal Flaps. Skull Base Surg 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Nakassa
- UPMC Center for Cranial Base Surgery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Benita Valappil
- UPMC Center for Cranial Base Surgery, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Yue-Fang Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Georgios Zenonos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Eric Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Juan Fernandez-Miranda
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Carl Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Paul Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rowan NR, Turner MT, Valappil B, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. Injury of the Carotid Artery during Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery: Surveys of Skull Base Surgeons. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2017; 79:302-308. [PMID: 29765829 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1607314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/10/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to review endoscopic skull base surgeon experience with internal carotid artery (ICA) injuries during endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) to provide an estimate of the incidence of ICA injury, the associated factors and identify the best training modalities for the management of this complication. Design Anonymous electronic survey of past participants at a well-established endoscopic skull base surgery course and a global online community of skull base surgeons. Main Outcome Measures Relative incidence of ICA injuries during EES, associated anatomic and intraoperative factors, and surgeon experience. Results At least 20% of surgeons in each surveyed population experienced a carotid artery injury. Reported carotid artery injuries were most common during tumor exposure and removal (48%). The parasellar carotid artery was the most commonly injured segment (39%). Carotid artery injuries were more common in high-volume surgeons, but only statistically significant in one of the two populations. Attendance at a skull base course or courses did not change the incidence of carotid artery injury in either surveyed population. In both surveys, respondents preferred live surgeries or active (not computer simulated) training models. Conclusions ICA injury is underreported and most common when manipulating the parasellar carotid artery for exposure and tumor dissection. Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with these injuries, vascular injury management should be prioritized and taught in a graduated approach by modern endoscopic skull base courses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas R Rowan
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Meghan T Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Benita Valappil
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Juan C Fernandez-Miranda
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Linkov F, Valappil B, McAfee J, Goughnour SL, Hildrew DM, McCall AA, Linkov I, Hirsch B, Snyderman C. Development of an evidence-based decision pathway for vestibular schwannoma treatment options. Am J Otolaryngol 2017; 38:57-64. [PMID: 27780583 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2016.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2016] [Accepted: 09/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To integrate multiple sources of clinical information with patient feedback to build evidence-based decision support model to facilitate treatment selection for patients suffering from vestibular schwannomas (VS). METHODS This was a mixed methods study utilizing focus group and survey methodology to solicit feedback on factors important for making treatment decisions among patients. Two 90-minute focus groups were conducted by an experienced facilitator. Previously diagnosed VS patients were recruited by clinical investigators at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). Classical content analysis was used for focus group data analysis. Providers were recruited from practices within the UPMC system and were surveyed using Delphi methods. This information can provide a basis for multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework to develop a treatment decision support system for patients with VS. RESULTS Eight themes were derived from these data (focus group + surveys): doctor/health care system, side effects, effectiveness of treatment, anxiety, mortality, family/other people, quality of life, and post-operative symptoms. These data, as well as feedback from physicians were utilized in building a multi-criteria decision model. DISCUSSION The study illustrated steps involved in the development of a decision support model that integrates evidence-based data and patient values to select treatment alternatives. CONCLUSIONS Studies focusing on the actual development of the decision support technology for this group of patients are needed, as decisions are highly multifactorial. Such tools have the potential to improve decision making for complex medical problems with alternate treatment pathways.
Collapse
|
13
|
O'Donnell JA, Modesto A, Oakley M, Polk DE, Valappil B, Spallek H. Sealants and dental caries: insight into dentists' behaviors regarding implementation of clinical practice recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144:e24-30. [PMID: 23543700 PMCID: PMC3676186 DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The authors conducted a qualitative study of private-practice dentists in their offices by using vignette-based interviews to assess barriers to the use of evidence-based clinical recommendations in the treatment of noncavitated carious lesions. METHODS The authors recruited 22 dentists as a convenience sample and presented them with two patient vignettes involving noncavitated carious lesions. Interviewers asked participants to articulate their thought processes as they described treatment recommendations. Participants compared their treatment plans with the American Dental Association's recommendations for sealing noncavitated carious lesions, and they described barriers to implementing these recommendations in their practices. The authors recorded and transcribed the sessions for accuracy and themes. RESULTS Personal clinical experience emerged as the determining factor in dentists' treatment decisions regarding noncavitated carious lesions. Additional factors were lack of reimbursement and mistrust of the recommendations. The authors found that knowledge of the recommendations did not lead to their adoption when the recommendation was incongruent with the dentist's personal experience. CONCLUSIONS The authors found that ingrained practice behavior based on personal clinical experience that differed substantially from evidence-based recommendations resulted in a rejection of these recommendations. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Attempts to improve the adoption of evidence-based practice must involve more than simple dissemination of information to achieve a balance between personal clinical experience and scientific evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean A O'Donnell
- School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 440 Salk Hall, 3501 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Scholle SH, Buranosky R, Hanusa BH, Ranieri L, Dowd K, Valappil B. Routine screening for intimate partner violence in an obstetrics and gynecology clinic. Am J Public Health 2003; 93:1070-2. [PMID: 12835182 PMCID: PMC1447906 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.93.7.1070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/25/2002] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|