1
|
Meyer GM, Hollunder B, Li N, Butenko K, Dembek TA, Hart L, Nombela C, Mosley P, Akram H, Acevedo N, Borron BM, Chou T, Castaño Montoya JP, Strange B, Barcia JA, Tyagi H, Castle DJ, Smith AH, Choi KS, Kopell BH, Mayberg HS, Sheth SA, Goodman WK, Leentjens AFG, Richardson RM, Rossell SL, Bosanac P, Cosgrove GR, Kuhn J, Visser-Vandewalle V, Figee M, Dougherty DD, Siddiqi SH, Zrinzo L, Joyce E, Baldermann JC, Fox MD, Neudorfer C, Horn A. Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Optimal Stimulation Sites. Biol Psychiatry 2024; 96:101-113. [PMID: 38141909 PMCID: PMC11190041 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment option for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Several stimulation targets have been used, mostly in and around the anterior limb of the internal capsule and ventral striatum. However, the precise target within this region remains a matter of debate. METHODS Here, we retrospectively studied a multicenter cohort of 82 patients with OCD who underwent DBS of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum and mapped optimal stimulation sites in this region. RESULTS DBS sweet-spot mapping performed on a discovery set of 58 patients revealed 2 optimal stimulation sites associated with improvements on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, one in the anterior limb of the internal capsule that overlapped with a previously identified OCD-DBS response tract and one in the region of the inferior thalamic peduncle and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Critically, the nucleus accumbens proper and anterior commissure were associated with beneficial but suboptimal clinical improvements. Moreover, overlap with the resulting sweet- and sour-spots significantly estimated variance in outcomes in an independent cohort of 22 patients from 2 additional DBS centers. Finally, beyond obsessive-compulsive symptoms, stimulation of the anterior site was associated with optimal outcomes for both depression and anxiety, while the posterior site was only associated with improvements in depression. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest how to refine targeting of DBS in OCD and may be helpful in guiding DBS programming in existing patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garance M Meyer
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Barbara Hollunder
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ningfei Li
- Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Konstantin Butenko
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Till A Dembek
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lauren Hart
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Cristina Nombela
- Biological and Health Psychology, School of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Philip Mosley
- Clinical Brain Networks Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Neurosciences Queensland, St. Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Spring Hill, Queensland, Australia; Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Health and Biosecurity, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Harith Akram
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Acevedo
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin M Borron
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tina Chou
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Juan Pablo Castaño Montoya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bryan Strange
- Laboratory for Clinical Neuroscience, Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan A Barcia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Himanshu Tyagi
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - David J Castle
- University of Tasmania and Centre for Mental Health Service Innovation, Tasmania, Australia; State-wide Mental Health Service, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Andrew H Smith
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Ki Sueng Choi
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Brian H Kopell
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Wayne K Goodman
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Albert F G Leentjens
- Department of Psychiatry, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Susan L Rossell
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Bosanac
- St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - G Rees Cosgrove
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jens Kuhn
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Johanniter Hospital Oberhausen, EVKLN, Oberhausen, Germany
| | - Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martijn Figee
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Darin D Dougherty
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shan H Siddiqi
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ludvic Zrinzo
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eileen Joyce
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Juan Carlos Baldermann
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael D Fox
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andreas Horn
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ng PR, Bush A, Vissani M, McIntyre CC, Richardson RM. Biophysical Principles and Computational Modeling of Deep Brain Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:422-439. [PMID: 37204360 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.04.471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has revolutionized the treatment of neurological disorders, yet the mechanisms of DBS are still under investigation. Computational models are important in silico tools for elucidating these underlying principles and potentially for personalizing DBS therapy to individual patients. The basic principles underlying neurostimulation computational models, however, are not well known in the clinical neuromodulation community. OBJECTIVE In this study, we present a tutorial on the derivation of computational models of DBS and outline the biophysical contributions of electrodes, stimulation parameters, and tissue substrates to the effects of DBS. RESULTS Given that many aspects of DBS are difficult to characterize experimentally, computational models have played an important role in understanding how material, size, shape, and contact segmentation influence device biocompatibility, energy efficiency, the spatial spread of the electric field, and the specificity of neural activation. Neural activation is dictated by stimulation parameters including frequency, current vs voltage control, amplitude, pulse width, polarity configurations, and waveform. These parameters also affect the potential for tissue damage, energy efficiency, the spatial spread of the electric field, and the specificity of neural activation. Activation of the neural substrate also is influenced by the encapsulation layer surrounding the electrode, the conductivity of the surrounding tissue, and the size and orientation of white matter fibers. These properties modulate the effects of the electric field and determine the ultimate therapeutic response. CONCLUSION This article describes biophysical principles that are useful for understanding the mechanisms of neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan Bush
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matteo Vissani
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cameron C McIntyre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Robert Mark Richardson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beydler E, Katzell L, Putinta K, Holbert R, Carr B. Deep brain stimulation programming for intractable obsessive-compulsive disorder using a long pulse width. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1142677. [PMID: 37457764 PMCID: PMC10344357 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1142677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Around 25% of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) do not respond to medication or psychotherapy, producing significant impairment and treatment challenges. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been shown in multiple blinded trials to be a safe and durable emerging option for treatment-refractory OCD. Intraoperative device interrogation offers a theoretical anchor for starting outpatient DBS programming; however, no definitive post-operative programming algorithm for psychiatrists exists currently. Case Here we present a 58-year-old female with childhood-onset, severe, intractable OCD with multiple failed trials of psychotherapy, medication, and electroconvulsive therapy. After interdisciplinary evaluation, she underwent bilateral electrode implantation targeting the anterior limb of the internal capsule, nucleus accumbens (ALIC/NAc). Intraoperative interrogation afforded sparse information about a preferred lead contact or current density target. Subsequent outpatient interrogation consisted of systematic and independent mapping using monopolar cathodic stimulation with constant current. Modulating bipolar and triple monopolar configurations, amplitude, and pulse width all failed to induce observable effects. Given negligible interrogation feedback, we created an electrical field through the ALIC bilaterally, using the three most ventral contacts to create triple monopoles, with a long pulse width and moderate amperage. Conclusion Three months post-programming, the patient reported significant improvement in OCD symptoms, particularly checking behaviors, with response sustained over the next several months. As with our case, the majority of DBS lead contacts do not induce affective or physiological markers in patients, complicating programming optimization. Here, we discuss an approach to titrating various stimulation parameters and purported mechanisms of physiological markers in DBS for OCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Beydler
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Lauren Katzell
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kevin Putinta
- Department of Psychiatry, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, United States
| | - Richard Holbert
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Brent Carr
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Philipson J, Naesstrom M, Johansson JD, Hariz M, Blomstedt P, Jahanshahi M. Deep brain stimulation in the ALIC-BNST region targeting the bed nucleus of stria terminalis in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: effects on cognition after 12 months. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 165:1201-1214. [PMID: 36056244 PMCID: PMC10140080 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05351-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate cognitive effects 12 months after Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the Bed Nucleus of Stria Terminalis (BNST) in patients with refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). METHODS Eight patients (5 female; mean ± SD age 36 ± 15) with OCD were included. A neuropsychological test battery covering verbal and spatial episodic memory, executive function, and attention was administered preoperatively and 12 months after surgery. Medical records were used as a source for descriptive data to probe for any changes not covered by standardized checklists and the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the primary outcome measure. RESULTS At 12 months, seven patients showed response to DBS: three were full responders (i.e., Y-BOCS ≥ 35% improvement), and four were partial responders (Y-BOCS 25-34% improvement). Relative to baseline, there was a slight decline on visuo-spatial learning (p = 0.027), and improved performance on the Color-Word Interference inhibition/switching subtest (p = 0.041), suggesting improvement in cognitive flexibility. CONCLUSIONS DBS in the BNST for treatment refractory OCD generates very few adverse cognitive effects and improves cognitive flexibility after 12 months of stimulation. The improvement in Y-BOCS and the absence of major cognitive side effects support the BNST as a potential target for DBS in severe OCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Philipson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Neuroscience, Umeå University, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Matilda Naesstrom
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Marwan Hariz
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Neuroscience, Umeå University, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden.,Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 33 Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Patric Blomstedt
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Neuroscience, Umeå University, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Marjan Jahanshahi
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, 33 Queen Square, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wårdell K, Nordin T, Vogel D, Zsigmond P, Westin CF, Hariz M, Hemm S. Deep Brain Stimulation: Emerging Tools for Simulation, Data Analysis, and Visualization. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:834026. [PMID: 35478842 PMCID: PMC9036439 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.834026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established neurosurgical procedure for movement disorders that is also being explored for treatment-resistant psychiatric conditions. This review highlights important consideration for DBS simulation and data analysis. The literature on DBS has expanded considerably in recent years, and this article aims to identify important trends in the field. During DBS planning, surgery, and follow up sessions, several large data sets are created for each patient, and it becomes clear that any group analysis of such data is a big data analysis problem and has to be handled with care. The aim of this review is to provide an update and overview from a neuroengineering perspective of the current DBS techniques, technical aids, and emerging tools with the focus on patient-specific electric field (EF) simulations, group analysis, and visualization in the DBS domain. Examples are given from the state-of-the-art literature including our own research. This work reviews different analysis methods for EF simulations, tractography, deep brain anatomical templates, and group analysis. Our analysis highlights that group analysis in DBS is a complex multi-level problem and selected parameters will highly influence the result. DBS analysis can only provide clinically relevant information if the EF simulations, tractography results, and derived brain atlases are based on as much patient-specific data as possible. A trend in DBS research is creation of more advanced and intuitive visualization of the complex analysis results suitable for the clinical environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Wårdell
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Teresa Nordin
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Dorian Vogel
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Muttenz, Switzerland
| | - Peter Zsigmond
- Department of Neurosurgery and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Carl-Fredrik Westin
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Marwan Hariz
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Neuroscience, Ume University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Simone Hemm
- Neuroengineering Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Muttenz, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sato A, Tominaga K, Iwatani Y, Kato Y, Wataya-Kaneda M, Makita K, Nemoto K, Taniike M, Kagitani-Shimono K. Abnormal White Matter Microstructure in the Limbic System Is Associated With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Front Neurol 2022; 13:782479. [PMID: 35359647 PMCID: PMC8963953 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.782479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a genetic disease that arises from TSC1 or TSC2 abnormalities and induces the overactivation of the mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin pathways. The neurological symptoms of TSC include epilepsy and tuberous sclerosis complex-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND). Although TAND affects TSC patients' quality of life, the specific region in the brain associated with TAND remains unknown. We examined the association between white matter microstructural abnormalities and TAND, using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).MethodsA total of 19 subjects with TSC and 24 age-matched control subjects were enrolled. Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) were performed to assess group differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) between the TSC and control groups. Atlas-based association analysis was performed to reveal TAND-related white matter in subjects with TSC. Multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between TAND and the DTI parameters; FA and mean diffusivity in seven target regions and projection fibers.ResultsThe TBSS showed significantly reduced FA in the right hemisphere and particularly in the inferior frontal occipital fasciculus (IFOF), inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), uncinate fasciculus (UF), and genu of corpus callosum (CC) in the TSC group relative to the control group. In the association analysis, intellectual disability was widely associated with all target regions. In contrast, behavioral problems and autistic features were associated with the limbic system white matter and anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC) and CC.ConclusionThe disruption of white matter integrity may induce underconnectivity between cortical and subcortical regions. These findings suggest that TANDs are not the result of an abnormality in a specific brain region, but rather caused by connectivity dysfunction as a network disorder. This study indicates that abnormal white matter connectivity including the limbic system is relevant to TAND. The analysis of brain and behavior relationship is a feasible approach to reveal TAND related white matter and neural networks. TAND should be carefully assessed and treated at an early stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akemi Sato
- United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Tominaga
- United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Molecular Research Center for Children's Mental Development, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Pediatrics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Iwatani
- United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Molecular Research Center for Children's Mental Development, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Pediatrics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoko Kato
- Molecular Research Center for Children's Mental Development, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mari Wataya-Kaneda
- Division of Health Science, Department of Neurocutaneous Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Dermatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kai Makita
- Research Center for Child Mental Development, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Nemoto
- Division of Clinical Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masako Taniike
- United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Molecular Research Center for Children's Mental Development, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Pediatrics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kuriko Kagitani-Shimono
- United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
- Molecular Research Center for Children's Mental Development, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Pediatrics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
- *Correspondence: Kuriko Kagitani-Shimono
| |
Collapse
|