Alfacalcidol-supplemented raloxifene therapy has greater bone-sparing effect than raloxifene-alone therapy in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis or osteopenia

Effect of vitamin D supplementation or fortification on bone turnover markers in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vitamin D is a vital indicator of musculoskeletal health, as it plays an important role through the regulation of bone and mineral metabolism. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation/fortification on bone turnover markers in women. All human randomised clinical trials reported changes in bone resorption markers (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen (sCTX) and urinary type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptide (uNTX)) or bone formation factors (osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) and procollagen type-1 intact N-terminal propeptide (P1NP)) following vitamin D administration in women (aged ≥ 18 years) were considered. Mean differences (MD) and their respective 95 % CI were calculated based on fixed or random effects models according to the heterogeneity status. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression models, sensitivity analysis, risk of bias, publication bias and the quality of the included studies were also evaluated. We found that vitamin D supplementation had considerable effect on sCTX (MD: -0·038, n 22) and OC (MD: -0·610, n 24) with high heterogeneity and uNTX (MD: -8·188, n 6) without heterogeneity. Our results showed that age, sample size, dose, duration, baseline vitamin D level, study region and quality of studies might be sources of heterogeneity in this meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis also revealed significant reductions in P1NP level in dose less than 600 μg/d and larger study sample size (>100 participants). Moreover, no significant change was found in BALP level. Vitamin D supplementation/fortification significantly reduced bone resorption markers in women. However, results were inconsistent for bone formation markers.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) with vitamin D composite agent can prevent fracture better than SERMs treatment: based on the National Health Claims Database 2017-2019

With the analysis of nationwide health claim data, treatment with the composite agent of SERMs and vitamin D reduces the risk of osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture better compared to SERMs treatment in women with osteoporosis aged ≥ 50 years.

PURPOSE

This study compared the potential of the composite agent of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and vitamin D (SERM + VitD) with that of SERMs-only for fracture prevention and mortality reduction in women aged ≥ 50 years.

METHODS

The incidence of osteoporotic fracture (fractures of the vertebrae, hip, wrist, or humerus) and all-cause death after treatment with SERM + VitD and SERMs were characterized using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database 2017-2019. The participants were divided into two groups (SERM + VitD vs SERMs). After exclusion and propensity score matching, 2,885 patients from each group were included in the analysis. Fracture incidence was compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to compare the risks of fracture occurrence and mortality between the groups.

RESULTS

The incidence rate (138.6/10,000 vs. 192.4/10,000 person-years), and risk of osteoporotic fractures (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.97; p = 0.024) were lower in the SERM + VitD group than in the SERMs group. Analysis for specific fractures showed a lower hazard of hip fracture in the SERM + VitD group (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.09-0.71; p = 0.009). No difference was observed between the groups regarding mortality.

CONCLUSION

The risk of osteoporotic fractures, especially hip fractures, was lower in the SERM + VitD group than in the SERMs group. Therefore, the composite agent of SERMs and vitamin D can be considered as a viable option for postmenopausal women with a relatively low fracture risk.

Position Statement: Vitamin D Intake to Prevent Osteoporosis and Fracture in Adults

Adequate vitamin D status is essential for bone health. New randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on bone health have recently been published. This position statement updates and expands on the previous 2015 position statement of the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research on the adequate vitamin D status for healthy older adults (age ≥ 70 years) and those at high risk of osteoporosis and fracture (adults on osteoporosis medications) to maintain serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25[OH]D) levels ≥ 20 ng/mL but < 50 ng/mL. A serum 25(OH)D level of 30 ng/mL may be beneficial for those on anti-resorptives. Vitamin D can be obtained from ultraviolet light exposure and diet. To reach the target vitamin D status through intake, adults must consume at least 400 IU/day to reach 20 ng/mL and 800 to 1,000 IU/day to reach 30 ng/mL. Foods familiar to the Korean diet that are high in vitamin D content or consumed frequently enough to positively impact vitamin D status are introduced in addition to the amount required to help reach one's target vitamin D status.

Raloxifene/Vitamin D Combination Therapy vs. Raloxifene Monotherapy on Serum 25-Hydroxy-Vitamin D Level among Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis or Osteopenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

We compared the efficacy of a fixed dose combination of raloxifene 60 mg/vitamin D 800 IU to raloxifene 60 mg alone on vitamin D status, as indicated by change in serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D (25[OH]D) levels.

Methods

In this 16-week, open-label, randomized, active controlled, multicenter clinical trial conducted in 4 university-affiliated hospitals in Korea, postmenopausal women aged 55 to 70 years with osteoporosis or osteopenia were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive raloxifene 60 mg/cholecalciferol 800 IU combination therapy or raloxifene 60 mg monotherapy. Primary endpoint was change in serum 25(OH)D level from baseline to 16 weeks after the intervention.

Results

A total of 96 participants were randomly assigned to raloxifene/vitamin D combination therapy (N=49) and raloxifene monotherapy (N=47) groups. At week 16, serum 25(OH)D level increased from baseline, only in the raloxifene/vitamin D combination therapy group. Change in serum 25(OH)D level from baseline to week 16 was higher in the raloxifene/vitamin D combination therapy group (2.7±6.5 ng/mL) than in the raloxifene monotherapy (−1.7±6.2 ng/mL; P=0.0034) group. Proportions and number of adverse events (AEs) categorized by the System-Organ Class were not different between the groups. There was only one severe AE case (spondylolisthesis; raloxifene/vitamin D group), unlikely to be related to trial intervention.

Conclusions

Among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia, a fixed dose combination of raloxifene 60 mg/vitamin D 800 IU showed superior efficacy in elevating serum 25(OH)D levels compared with raloxifene 60 mg alone during 16 weeks of follow-up. The safety of raloxifene/vitamin D combination was comparable to raloxifene alone.

Quality of life and patient satisfaction with raloxifene/cholecalciferol combination therapy in postmenopausal women

This study was performed to evaluate quality of life (QOL) and patient satisfaction with raloxifene/cholecalciferol combination therapy in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. This multicenter, prospective, noninterventional observational study included 3907 postmenopausal women who received a combination of raloxifene 60 mg and cholecalciferol 800 IU daily to treat or prevent osteoporosis. Changes in QOL and patient satisfaction were evaluated after 3 and 6 months of treatment. In addition, the safety profile was assessed. Mean age was 67.7 ± 9.3 years old. QOL, assessed by European Quality of life instrument 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) index, improved significantly after 3 months (0.81 ± 0.11, P < 0.001) and 6 months (0.82 ± 0.11, P < 0.001) of treatment compared to the baseline (0.78 ± 0.14). Improvement in QOL was also significant regardless of previous regimens both in women who were switched from other drugs (bisphosphonates or selective estrogen receptor modulators) and in women who received the study drug for the first time (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Percentage of women satisfied with the effects (from 37.3 to 67.7%, P < 0.001) and convenience (from 42.8 to 74.1%, P < 0.001) of treatment compared to previous medication significantly increased after 6 months of treatment. In addition, serious adverse drug reactions did not occur, and hot flushes were observed only in 12 women (0.3%). Combination therapy with raloxifene and cholecalciferol significantly improves quality of life with no serious adverse events and high patient satisfaction at 6 months. Our real-world data suggest that this regimen is a promising option for postmenopausal women with low bone mass.

Plain vitamin D or active vitamin D in the treatment of osteoporosis: where do we stand today?

Osteoporosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and its prevention in order to avert fractures was considered of great importance in maintaining well-being and independence among the elderly. Strategies for osteoporosis prevention are well delineated, but research shows that the treatment options offered today could still be improved. The role of plain vitamin D (cholecalciferol) in bone health and the prevention of osteoporosis are well documented; however, as a treatment for osteoporosis, either with or without calcium, it has been shown to be ineffective. This is due in part to the strong negative feedback mechanisms in place in vitamin D-replete patients. However, other factors linked directly to ageing such as oestrogen depletion, reduced kidney or liver function may also be involved in reducing the body's capability to activate plain vitamin efficiently. This is why active vitamin D analogues such as alfacalcidol, 1-α-(OH)D3, are of clinical interest. Alfacalcidol requires only one hydroxylation reaction to become active 1,25-(OH)2-vitamin D3, and the 25-hydroxylase catalyzing this reaction is found in the liver and also interestingly in osteoblasts suggesting a local effect. Registered for use in postmenopausal osteoporosis, in most countries worldwide, alfacalcidol has also shown efficacy in glucocorticoid-induced and male osteoporosis. The present review provides compelling evidence for the efficacy of this compound in the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures both in monotherapy and when combined with other osteoporotic drugs where additive effects are clear. The safety profile of alfacalcidol is shown to be highly acceptable and it is considered less likely to induce hypercalcaemia than another more widely used analogue, calcitriol. Therefore, it remains unclear as to why alfacalcidol is not more widely used in clinical practice.

Denosumab, raloxifene, romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures: a systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures are fractures that result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of non-bisphosphonates {denosumab [Prolia®; Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA], raloxifene [Evista®; Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan], romosozumab [Evenity®; Union Chimique Belge (UCB) S.A. (Brussels, Belgium) and Amgen Inc.] and teriparatide [Forsteo®; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA]}, compared with each other, bisphosphonates or no treatment, for the prevention of fragility fracture.

DATA SOURCES

For the clinical effectiveness review, nine electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were searched up to July 2018.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of fracture and femoral neck bone mineral density were conducted. A review of published economic analyses was undertaken and a model previously used to evaluate bisphosphonates was adapted. Discrete event simulation was used to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years for a simulated cohort of patients with heterogeneous characteristics. This was done for each non-bisphosphonate treatment, a strategy of no treatment, and the five bisphosphonate treatments previously evaluated. The model was populated with effectiveness evidence from the systematic review and network meta-analysis. All other parameters were estimated from published sources. An NHS and Personal Social Services perspective was taken, and costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Fracture risk was estimated from patient characteristics using the QFracture® (QFracture-2012 open source revision 38, Clinrisk Ltd, Leeds, UK) and FRAX® (web version 3.9, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK) tools. The relationship between fracture risk and incremental net monetary benefit was estimated using non-parametric regression. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses were used to assess uncertainty.

RESULTS

Fifty-two randomised controlled trials of non-bisphosphonates were included in the clinical effectiveness systematic review and an additional 51 randomised controlled trials of bisphosphonates were included in the network meta-analysis. All treatments had beneficial effects compared with placebo for vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures, with hazard ratios varying from 0.23 to 0.94, depending on treatment and fracture type. The effects on vertebral fractures and the percentage change in bone mineral density were statistically significant for all treatments. The rate of serious adverse events varied across trials (0-33%), with most between-group differences not being statistically significant for comparisons with placebo/no active treatment, non-bisphosphonates or bisphosphonates. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were > £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year for all non-bisphosphonate interventions compared with no treatment across the range of QFracture and FRAX scores expected in the population eligible for fracture risk assessment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for denosumab may fall below £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year at very high levels of risk or for high-risk patients with specific characteristics. Raloxifene was dominated by no treatment (resulted in fewer quality-adjusted life-years) in most risk categories.

LIMITATIONS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are uncertain for very high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-bisphosphonates are effective in preventing fragility fractures, but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are generally greater than the commonly applied threshold of £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018107651.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 29. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Bazedoxifene improves renal function and increases renal phosphate excretion in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Because aging is a predictor of renal insufficiency in the general population, renal function is a concern in postmenopausal patients undergoing treatment for osteoporosis. Although high serum phosphate concentration is a predictor of renal insufficiency, the effect of selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) on renal function and phosphate homeostasis remains to be established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We administered 20 mg/day bazedoxifene to 48 postmenopausal osteoporotic women who had been taking alfacalcidol for ≥ 6 months, and assessed lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS-BMD), renal function (by calculating estimated glomerular filtration rate using serum cystatin-C levels [eGFRcys] [range 38.0-98.2 mL/min/1.73 m²]), and phosphate homeostasis.

RESULTS

LS-BMD was significantly higher 6 months after the initiation of bazedoxifene administration. eGFRcys had increased by 3 months after initiation and was stable until 12 months. Serum phosphate gradually decreased after initiation, reaching statistical significance at 6 months. The changes in serum phosphate were also significant when the maximum tubular reabsorption rate of phosphate was normalized to glomerular filtration rate (TmP/GFR), indicating that bazedoxifene treatment reduces serum phosphate by increasing the urinary excretion of phosphate. The change in eGFRcys after the initiation of bazedoxifene was significantly negatively correlated with the change in serum phosphate, suggesting that a reduction in serum phosphate improves renal function.

CONCLUSION

Bazedoxifene improves renal function, possibly by increasing renal phosphate excretion, in postmenopausal osteoporotic women without severe renal insufficiency.

Treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures by zoledronic acid injection combined with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation

OBJECTIVE

To observe the clinical results of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) combined with zoledronic acid injection in the treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.

METHODS

60 elderly patients with osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures were diagnosed using a dual energy X-ray bone density instrument. Patients were randomly divided into treatment or control groups (30 cases in each group). Patients in both groups were treated by closed/open reduction and internal fixation using PFNA. In the treatment group, patients received one zoledronic phosphonic acid injection of 5 mg/100 ml via intravenous drip, in addition to 600 mg of Caltrate D (qd) and 0.25 mg of alpha ossification alcohol (qd). The control group received 600 mg of Caltrate D (qd) and 0.25 mg of alpha ossification alcohol (qd). The oral drugs were administered for 12 months. Bone pain relief was observed, and changes in the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar and health-side hip were recorded. Clinical results were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Harris joint function score, and Osteo- porosis Quality of Life Scale (OQOLS).

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, bone pain symptoms were significantly alleviated (p < 0.05) in the treatment group. In the treatment and control groups, both between-group and within-group differences in BMD were significantly increased in L1e4, femoral neck and trochanter (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups in regard to the involved hip or the total rate of improvement at the end of the follow-up period, although cases in the treatment group had higher OQOLS scores than those of the controls (p = 0.04). Cases in the treatment group healed more quickly than those in the control group [(13 ± 3.2) weeks vs (15 ± 4.6) weeks, p = 0.02]. During the follow-up period, cases in the treatment group had no new fractures, whereas 2 new cases of hip fracture and 2 cases of distal radial fractures were observed among the controls.

CONCLUSION

Zoledronic acid injection combined with PFNA is a favorable treatment option for the elderly patients with osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture. It can effectively relieve bone pain, increase bone density, improve quality of life, reduce the occurrence of new fractures and promote fracture healing.

Randomized study comparing vitamin D3 and 1α-Hydroxyvitamin D3 in combination with pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND AND AIM

An intention-to-treat prospective randomized study was carried out to compare the potentiation of antiviral efficacies between cholecalciferol, non-activated vitamin D3 supplement, and alfacalcidol, activated 1α-Hydroxyvitamin D3 [1α (OH)-vitamin D3].

METHODS

Chronic hepatitis patients with genotype 1b hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection showing serum HCV-RNA levels greater than 5 Log IU/mL received oral administration of cholecalciferol (2000 IU/day) or alfacalcidol (0.5 μg/day) for 4 weeks, and then they were given pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN)-α2a plus ribavirin therapy in combination with either vitamin D3 for 48 or 72 weeks according to the response-guided manner.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients were evaluated. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)-D3] levels were increased only in patients in the cholecalciferol group during the lead-in vitamin D administration, and the levels at 4 weeks were higher in these patients than in those in the alfacalcidol group (P < 0.001), while serum 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1α,25(OH)2 -D3] levels were not different between both groups. Rapid virological response was obtained in six (33%) patients in the cholecalciferol group; the ratio was higher than that in the alfacalcidol group (one patient; 6%, P < 0.05). Serum HCV-RNA level decline at 4 weeks of combined Peg-IFN-α2a plus ribavirin therapy compared with the baseline levels were greater in the cholecalciferol group (4.6 Log IU/mL) than in the alfacalcidol group (3.5 Log IU/mL) (P < 0.05), when four patients showing null response to the therapy was excluded. However, both complete early virological response and sustained viral response rates were not different between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Cholecalciferol produced superior potentiation of the antiviral activity than alfacalcidol only during the initial periods of combined Peg-IFN-α2a plus ribavirin therapy through upregulation of serum 25(OH)-D3 levels.

Quality of life in Japanese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with raloxifene and vitamin D: post hoc analysis of a postmarketing study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of active vitamin D3 on quality of life (QOL) and pain in raloxifene-treated Japanese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of a previous prospective postmarketing observational study conducted without a comparator group. This study was conducted in 60 Japanese hospitals from September 2007 to February 2009. We compared changes from baseline in QOL and pain in patients receiving raloxifene plus active vitamin D3 with those in patients receiving raloxifene monotherapy at 8 and 24 weeks after treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (JapicCTI-070465).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

QOL and pain were assessed using Short Form-8 (SF-8), European Quality of Life Instrument 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JOQOL), visual analogue pain scales (VAS pain), and pain frequency scores.

RESULTS

A total of 506 patients were included in the post hoc analysis. Both raloxifene monotherapy (RLX, n = 354) and active vitamin D3 cotreatment (COMBI, n = 152) significantly improved QOL and reduced pain from the baseline at Week 8 and Week 24. The COMBI group had significantly greater improvements in JOQOL total score and activity of daily living (total) domain at Week 24 and last observation carried forward (LOCF) than the RLX group. The COMBI group also had significantly greater improvements in SF-8 domains of general health (at Week 8, Week 24, and LOCF), role physical (at Week 24 and LOCF), and mental health (at LOCF) than the RLX group. The COMBI group also had significantly greater reduction in VAS pain at LOCF than the RLX group (mean [SD]: RLX = -0.99 [2.72], COMBI = -1.54 [2.21], P = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Active vitamin D3 supplementation to raloxifene treatment for 24 weeks may have additional benefits in improving QOL and relieving pain in Japanese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Systematic review of raloxifene in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis or low bone mass (osteopenia)

Purpose

To systematically review the literature describing the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of raloxifene for postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis or low bone mass (osteopenia).

Materials and methods

Medline via PubMed and Embase was systematically searched using prespecified terms. Retrieved publications were screened and included if they described randomized controlled trials or observational studies of postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis or osteopenia treated with raloxifene and reported one or more outcome measures (change in bone mineral density [BMD]; fracture incidence; change in bone-turnover markers, hip structural geometry, or blood–lipid profile; occurrence of adverse events; and change in quality of life or pain). Excluded publications were case studies, editorials, letters to the editor, narrative reviews, or publications from non-peer-reviewed journals; multidrug, multicountry, or multidisease studies with no drug-, country-, or disease-level analysis; or studies of participants on dialysis.

Results

Of the 292 publications retrieved, 15 publications (seven randomized controlled trials, eight observational studies) were included for review. Overall findings were statistically significant increases in BMD of the lumbar spine (nine publications), but not the hip region (eight publications), a low incidence of vertebral fracture (three publications), decreases in markers of bone turnover (eleven publications), improved hip structural geometry (two publications), improved blood–lipid profiles (five publications), a low incidence of hot flushes, leg cramps, venous thromboembolism, and stroke (12 publications), and improved quality of life and pain relief (one publication).

Conclusion

Findings support raloxifene for reducing vertebral fracture risk by improving BMD and reducing bone turnover in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis or osteopenia. Careful consideration of fracture risk and the risk–benefit profile of antiosteoporosis medications is required when managing patients with osteoporosis.

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D below 25 ng/mL is a risk factor for long bone fracture comparable to bone mineral density in Japanese postmenopausal women

There is emergent evidence for divergent associations between 25(OH)D levels and fractures by race and ethnicity, but data on Asian populations are sparse. We investigated this association in a primary care cohort of 1470 postmenopausal Japanese women followed for a mean period of 7.2 years and explored a potential threshold of 25(OH)D. Endpoints were incident vertebral, proximal femur, and long bone fractures. Rate ratios were estimated using multivariate Poisson regression adjusted for lumbar or femur bone mineral density (BMD) less than -2.5 SD of the young adult mean (YAM), age, weight, presence of diabetes mellitus, parathyroid hormone, estimated glomerular filtration rate, prior fracture, back pain, present medications and past medical history. Mean age was 63.7 ± 10.7 years and osteoporosis patients were 41.3 %. The background data of the present participants were almost identical to the subjects participating in the National Health and Nutrition Survey of 2003. Overall, 49.6 % of the subjects had a 25(OH)D value <20 ng/mL and 27.8 % had a 25(OH)D value from 20 to 24 ng/mL. The propensity score for exposure to 25(OH)D < 25 ng/mL in the present and independent community dwelling populations, namely the Miyama and Taiji cohorts, were not significantly different, suggesting no evidence for selection bias. The generalized additive models showed clear decreasing trends in incidence rates of proximal femur and long bone fractures at higher levels of 25(OH)D, and the annual incidence rate of proximal femur fracture was around 0.0005 in women with 25(OH)D > 25 ng/mL, probably leading to the decreasing trend in long bone fracture. Multivariate-adjusted rate ratios of 25(OH)D < 25 ng/mL were 1.01 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.22, p = 0.88) for vertebral fracture, 2.71 (95 % CI 0.94-7.83, p = 0.07) for proximal femur fracture, and 2.20 (95 % CI 1.37-3.53, p < 0.01) for long bone fracture. The respective rate ratios of a BMD level lower than -2.5 SD of the YAM were 1.61 (95 % CI 1.33-1.94, p < 0.01), 1.52 (95 % CI 0.67-3.45, p = 0.32), and 1.54 (95 % CI 1.02-2.33, p = 0.04). In conclusion, 25(OH)D is a leading risk factor for long bone fracture comparable to BMD in Japanese postmenopausal women. The contribution of 25(OH)D to fracture risks is substantial even below 25 ng/mL and is possibly site-specific. We recommend measuring the serum 25(OH)D level in primary care settings.

The SERM raloxifene improves diaphyseal fracture healing in mice

Although several studies reported that raloxifene treatment improves postmenopausal osteoporotic bone structure and reduces fracture risk, only a few animal and no human studies have examined its effects on the fracture healing process. Thus the aim of the present study was to determine, whether systemic application of the selective estrogen receptor modulator raloxifene promotes fracture healing compared to untreated control-, estrogen-deficient-, as well as estrogen-treated mice using a standardized femoral osteotomy model (n = 60 mice). Ten days after surgery, contact radiography and undecalcified histomorphometric analysis revealed that raloxifene administration significantly improved the early stage of fracture healing compared to all other groups. At day 20, raloxifene and estrogen treatment led to a significant increase in callus mineralization and trabecular thickness compared to control mice. μCT analyses revealed no evidence of complete bony bridging of the fracture site in any control-, nor estrogen-deficient mouse after 20 days, while all femoral fractures in the raloxifene and estrogen group already healed adequately at this time. These data indicate that raloxifene treatment significantly improves all phases of fracture healing at least in mice. Therefore, raloxifene could be a possible pharmaceutical to enhance fracture healing in women, without the known side effects of estrogen.

Combination treatment with eldecalcitol (ED-71) and raloxifene improves bone mechanical strength by suppressing bone turnover and increasing bone mineral density in ovariectomized rats

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of combination treatment with eldecalcitol (ELD) and raloxifene (RAL) on bone turnover, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone strength. Eight-month-old rats were ovariectomized (OVX) or sham operated, and divided into five groups (Sham, OVX+vehicle, OVX+RAL, OVX+ELD and OVX+ELD+RAL). ELD (7.5 ng/kg) and RAL (0.3mg/kg) were orally administered alone or in combination daily. Urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD) levels were measured after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. After 12 weeks of treatment, BMD and mechanical properties of the lumbar spine and femur were assessed, and bone histomorphometry was performed. Urinary DPD levels in all the treatment groups were significantly decreased compared with the OVX+vehicle group. At 4 weeks of treatment, urinary DPD level of the combination group was significantly lower than that of either monotherapy group. The reduction in the BMD of the lumbar spine and femur by OVX was significantly prevented in all the treatment groups, and the BMD in the combination group was significantly higher than that in either monotherapy group. The ultimate load and work to failure of the fifth lumbar vertebra were significantly improved only by the combination treatment. The femoral midshaft ultimate load was significantly increased in the OVX+ELD group and the combination group, and the femoral midshaft work to failure was increased only in the combination group. Bone histomorphometric analysis using the third lumbar vertebra revealed that osteoblast surface (Ob.S/BS), osteoclast surface (Oc.S/BS) and osteoclast number (N.Oc/BS) significantly decreased in all treatment groups, and osteoid surface (OS/BS) and bone formation rate (BFR/BS) significantly decreased in the ELD-treated and combination groups. The values of Ob.S/BS and OS/BS in the combination group were lower than those in either of the monotherapy groups. The bone formation parameters in the combination group were not reduced to below levels of the sham-operated control, suggesting that the combination therapy with ELD and RAL may not cause oversuppression of bone turnover. These results indicated that the combination treatment with ELD and RAL might be a beneficial therapy with respect to their combined effects of enhancing the mechanical properties of trabecular and cortical bone by suppressing bone turnover and increasing BMD more than either monotherapy.