Radiographic clues for determining carpal instability and treatment protocol for scaphoid fractures

Factors associated with union time of acute middle-third scaphoid fractures: an observational study

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the union time of acute middle-third scaphoid fractures following treatments and to analyze the effect of different factors on late union.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with acute middle-third scaphoid fracture at our institution between January 2013 and December 2017. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and treatment strategy, such as age, gender, body mass index, habit of smoking, sides of injury, dominant hand, ulnar variance, multiple fractures, and treatment methods, were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify possible predictive factors.

Results

A total of 132 patients with scaphoid fracture were included in our study. Operation was performed in 67 patients (50.8%), and conservative treatment was performed in the other 65 patients (49.2%). The union time was 7.2±0.5 weeks. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, late diagnosis (odds ratio, 1.247; 95% CI, 1.022–1.521) and conservative treatment method (odds ratio, 1.615; 95% CI, 1.031–2.528) were identified as 2 independent predictors of late union in scaphoid fractures patients. Other parameters were not demonstrated to be predictive factors.

Conclusion

Late diagnosis and conservative treatment were two factors associated with late union. Long time of follow-up is necessary for patient with these factors.

Current Management of Scaphoid Nonunion Based on the Biomechanical Study

Scaphoid nonunion causes abnormal wrist kinematics and typically leads to carpal collapse and subsequent degenerative arthritis of the wrist. However, the natural history, including carpal collapse and degenerative arthritis of scaphoid nonunion, may vary at different fracture locations. This article reviews recent biomechanical studies related to the natural history of scaphoid nonunion. In the distal-type fractures (type B2 in Herbert classification), where the fracture located distal to the scaphoid apex, the proximal scaphoid fragment and lunate, which are connected through the dorsal scapholunate interosseous ligament (DSLIL) and dorsal intercarpal ligament (DIC), extend together, and the distal fragment of the scaphoid flexes individually. Therefore, untreated type B2 fractures normally show the humpback deformity, resulting in dorsal intercalated segment instability deformity relatively earlier after the injury. In the proximal-type fractures (type B1), where the fracture is located proximal to the scaphoid apex, the connection between the distal fragment and lunate is preserved through the DSLIL and DIC so that the scaphoid-lunate complex remains stable and the carpal collapse is less severe than that in distal-type fractures. The fracture location relative to the apex of the dorsal scaphoid ridge is a reliable landmark in the determination of the natural history of scaphoid nonunion.

Three-dimensional analysis of osteophyte formation on distal radius following scaphoid nonunion

BACKGROUND

The purposes of this study were to quantitatively analyze osteophyte formation of the distal radius following scaphoid nonunion and to investigate how fracture locations relate to osteophyte formation patterns.

METHODS

Three-dimensional surface models of the scaphoid and distal radius were constructed from computed tomographic images of both the wrists of 17 patients' with scaphoid nonunion. The scaphoid nonunions were classified into 3 types according to the location of the fracture line: distal extra-articular (n = 6); distal intra-articular (n = 5); and proximal (n = 6). The osteophyte models of the radius were created by subtracting the mirror image of the contralateral radius model from the affected radius model using a Boolean operation. The osteophyte locations on the radius were divided into 5 areas: styloid process, dorsal scaphoid fossa, volar scaphoid fossa, dorsal lunate fossa, and volar lunate fossa. Osteophyte volumes were compared among the areas and types of nonunion. The presence or absence of dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI) deformity was also determined.

RESULTS

The distal intra-articular type exhibited significantly larger osteophytes in the styloid process than the distal extra-articular type. Furthermore, the proximal type exhibited significantly larger osteophytes in the dorsal scaphoid fossa than the distal extra-articular type. Finally, the distal intra- and extra-articular types were more associated with DISI deformity and tended to have larger osteophytes in the lunate fossa than the proximal type.

CONCLUSION

The pattern of osteophyte formation in the distal radius determined using three-dimensional computed tomography imaging varied among the different types of scaphoid nonunion (distal extra-articular, distal intra-articular, and proximal). The results of this study are clinically useful in determining whether additional resection of osteophytes or radial styloid is necessary or not during the treatment of the scaphoid nonunion.

Classifications of Acute Scaphoid Fractures: A Systematic Literature Review

Background In the lack of consensus, surgeon-based preference determines how acute scaphoid fractures are classified. There is a great variety of classification systems with considerable controversies. Purposes The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of the different classification systems, clarifying their subgroups and analyzing their popularity by comparing citation indexes. The intention was to improve data comparison between studies using heterogeneous fracture descriptions. Methods We performed a systematic review of the literature based on a search of medical literature from 1950 to 2015, and a manual search using the reference lists in relevant book chapters. Only original descriptions of classifications of acute scaphoid fractures in adults were included. Popularity was based on citation index as reported in the databases of Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar. Articles that were cited <10 times in WoS were excluded. Results Our literature search resulted in 308 potentially eligible descriptive reports of which 12 reports met the inclusion criteria. We distinguished 13 different (sub) classification systems based on (1) fracture location, (2) fracture plane orientation, and (3) fracture stability/displacement. Based on citations numbers, the Herbert classification was most popular, followed by the Russe and Mayo classifications. All classification systems were based on plain radiography. Conclusions Most classification systems were based on fracture location, displacement, or stability. Based on the controversy and limited reliability of current classification systems, suggested research areas for an updated classification include three-dimensional fracture pattern etiology and fracture fragment mobility assessed by dynamic imaging.

Scaphoid Fracture - Overview and Conservative Treatment

Scaphoid fracture is the most common fracture in carpal bones. Although the reported union rate of conservatively-treated fractures is more than 90%, there is a controversy over the most appropriate treatment. In recent years, many reports have compared the clinical outcomes of conservatively-treated scaphoid fractures with the results of operatively treated ones using randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment. In this paper, based on literature review, we provide an overview of the management of the acute scaphoid fractures particularly focusing on the issues related to conservative treatment.