Does fusion status after posterior lumbar interbody fusion affect patient-based QOL outcomes? An evaluation performed using a patient-based outcome measure

Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of different oblique lumbar interbody fusions for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

To systematically evaluate the differences in the clinical efficacy of lumbar degenerative disorders (LDDs) treatment between oblique lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF), OLIF stand-alone (OLIF-SA), and OLIF with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF). A systematic search was conducted on both English and Chinese databases, wherein the literature was screened based on title, abstract, and full text. Literature that met the inclusion criteria was assessed for quality and relevant information was extracted. The main outcome indicators were recorded and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed. A thorough evaluation was conducted on the 12 papers that satisfied the inclusion criteria. Among these articles, 5 studies compared OLIF-PF with OLIF-SA, 5 studies compared OLIF-PF with OLIF-AF, and 2 studies compared OLIF-PF, OLIF-SA, and OLIF-AF. According to the included articles, a total of 758 people were treated with OLIF surgery (341 individuals covered in OLIF-PF group, 288 individuals covered in OLIF-SA group, and 129 individuals covered in OLIF-129 group). Pooled analysis showed that OLIF-PF performed better in terms of imaging outcomes compared to OLIF-SA and OLIF-AF. However, in terms of surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss, OLIF-PF showed a significant disadvantage compared to the other two surgical procedures. The ODI scores exhibited a preference for OLIF-AF, indicating a marginal superiority of OLIF-AF with regard to clinical outcomes. It is advisable for physicians to carefully select the most suitable OLIF procedure, taking into account their expertise and the individual requirements of each patient.

Trabecular Bone Remodeling after Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indirect Findings for Stress Transmission between Vertebrae after Spinal Fusion Surgery

Introduction

After posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), trabecular bone remodeling (TBR) occurs in the vertebral body. This study aimed to investigate whether imaging findings obtained with PLIF are applicable to lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF).

Methods

A total of 53 cases who underwent one- or two-level LLIF with polyether ether ketone cage and posterior spinal fixation/fusion (PSF) were retrospectively included in this study. TBR, vertebral endplate cyst (VEC), facet union, and pseudarthrosis were investigated on computed tomography (CT) images at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Of the 53 patients, 36 (68%) who underwent CT examination at approximately 5 years postoperatively were subanalyzed.

Results

TBR was commonly observed anterior to the cage on CT sagittal images. The TBR-positive rate was 21%, 67%, and 73% at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively, respectively. The 3-month TBR-positive segments showed significantly less VEC (0% vs. 29%, P=0.029) at 1 year postoperatively. The 1-year TBR-positive segments showed a significantly higher facet union rate (83% vs. 57%, P=0.019) and less pseudoarthrosis (0% vs. 13%, P=0.041) at 2 years postoperatively. At 5 years postoperatively, 50% of the 2-year TBR-positive segments turned negative with solid intervertebral bony fusion.

Conclusions

TBR-positive segments had significantly lower future VEC positivity, higher future facet union rates, and lower future pseudarthrosis rates. In LLIF-PSF, TBR suggests the establishment of intervertebral stability and allows consideration of intervertebral biomechanics.

Accelerated fusion dynamics by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, particularly in osteoporotic conditions

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Early fusion is crucial in interbody procedures to minimize mechanical complications resulting from delayed union, especially for patients with osteoporosis. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are used in spinal fusion procedures; however, limited evaluation exists regarding time-to-fusion for BMP use, particularly in patients with osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the difference in time-to-fusion after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery between recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) usage and nonusage groups according to bone density.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective single-center cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This study enrolled 132 patients (mean age, 65.25±8.66; male patients, 40.9%) who underwent single-level TLIF for degenerative disorders between February 2012 and December 2021, with pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT).

OUTCOME MEASURE

The interbody fusion mass and bone graft status on postoperative CT scans was obtained annually, and time-to-fusion was recorded for each patient.

METHODS

The patients were divided into 2 groups based on rhBMP-2 use during the interbody fusion procedure. Patients were further divided into osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal groups based on preoperative L1 vertebral body attenuation values, using cutoffs of 90 and 120 Hounsfield units. It was strictly defined that fusion is considered complete when a trabecular bone bridge was formed, and therefore, the time-to-fusion was measured in years. Time-to-fusion was statistically compared between BMP group and non-BMP groups, followed by further comparison according to bone density.

RESULTS

The time-to-fusion differed significantly between BMP and non-BMP groups, with half of the patients achieving fusion within 2.5 years in the BMP group compared with 4 years in the non-BMP group (p<.001). The fusion rate varied based on bone density, with the maximum difference observed in the osteoporosis group, when half of the patients achieved fusion within 3 years in the BMP group compared to 5 years in the non-BMP group (p<.001). Subgroup analysis was conducted, revealing no significant associations between time-to-fusion and factors known to influence the fusion process, including age, gender, medical history, smoking and alcohol use, and medication history, except for rh-BMP2 use and bone density.

CONCLUSIONS

RhBMP-2 usage significantly reduced time-to-fusion in single-level TLIF, especially in patients with osteoporosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Trabecular Bone Remodeling After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Three-Dimensional Porous Tantalum and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The criteria for determining completion of intervertebral stability after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) remain controversial. Several new radiological indicators of bone growth and osteointegration have been established. We compared computed tomography (CT) findings related to osteointegration after PLIF with interbody cages of two different materials and designs.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 103 patients who underwent PLIF with three-dimensional porous tantalum (Tn) cages or titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (TiP) cages. CT images obtained 3 months and 1 year after surgery were examined for trabecular bone remodeling (TBR), cancellous condensation (CC), and vertebral endplate cyst (VEC) formation. The incidences of each finding were compared by cage type, and rates of instrument failure and pseudarthrosis were determined.

RESULTS

Three months postoperatively, 87% of the levels with Tn cages exhibited TBR, whereas 96% of those with TiP cages did not (P < .001). Most levels with Tn cages levels exhibited TBR and no CC 3 months (81%) and 1 year (94%) after surgery. Although 78% of levels with TiP cages exhibited CC and no TBR 3 months after surgery, 59% exhibited both CC and TBR 1 year after surgery. Significantly fewer VECs formed around the Tn cages than around the TiP cages both 3 months (P = .002) and 1 year (P < .001) after surgery. Implant-related problems occurred at levels that exhibited neither TBR nor CC.

CONCLUSIONS

The porous tantalum cage may enable intervertebral stability that is comparable to bony fusion soon after surgery.

Efficacy of using autologous cells with graft substitutes for spinal fusion surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and imaging features

Over the past several decades, there has been a notable increase in the total number of spinal fusion procedures worldwide. Advanced spinal fusion techniques, surgical approaches, and new alternatives in grafting materials and implants, as well as autologous cellular therapies, have been widely employed for treating spinal diseases. While the potential of cellular therapies to yield better clinical results is appealing, supportive data are needed to confirm this claim. This meta-analysis aims to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes between graft substitutes with autologous cell therapies and graft substitutes alone. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies comparing graft substitutes with autologous cell therapies and graft substitutes alone up to February 2024. The risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated using the Downs and Black checklist. The following outcomes were extracted for comparison: fusion success, complications/adverse events, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Thirteen studies involving 836 patients were included, with 7 studies considered for the meta-analysis. Results indicated that the use of graft substitutes with autologous cell therapies demonstrated higher fusion success rates at 3, 6, and 12 months, lower VAS score at 6 months, and lower ODI score at 3, 6, and 12 months. The complication rate was similar between graft substitutes with autologous cell therapies and graft substitutes alone. Although the current literature remains limited, this meta-analysis suggests that the incorporation of cellular therapies such as bone marrow and platelet derivatives with graft substitutes is associated with a higher fusion rate and significant improvements in functional status and pain following spinal fusion. Future well-designed randomized clinical trials are needed to definitively assess the clinical effectiveness of cellular therapies in spinal fusion.

Trabecular Bone Remodeling as a New Indicator of Osteointegration After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

We newly found that trabecular bone remodeling (TBR) often appeared in the fixed adjacent vertebrae during bony fusion. Thus, TBR might indicate osteointegration. Hence, we aimed to investigate whether TBR in the early postoperative period could predict future bony fusion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 78 patients who underwent one-level PLIF. Demographic data were reviewed. Using computed tomography (CT) images taken at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, we investigated the vertebral endplate cyst (VEC) formation, TBR in the vertebral body, cage subsidence, and clear zone around pedicle screw (CZPS).

RESULTS

TBR had high interobserver reliability regardless of cage materials. VECs, TBR, and both were found in 30, 53, and 16 patients at 3 months postoperatively and in 30, 65, and 22 patients at 1 year postoperatively, respectively. The incidence of VEC, which indicates poor fixation, was lower in early (3 months postoperatively) TBR-positive patients, with a significant difference at 1 year postoperatively (3 months, P = .074; 1 year, P = .003). Furthermore, 3 (5.7%) of the 53 early TBR-positive patients had CZPS without instability at 1 year postoperatively. In 25 TBR-negative patients, 1 (4.0%) had pedicle screw cutout requiring reoperation, 1 (4.0%) had pseudarthrosis, and 4 (16%) had CZPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early TBR (3 months) did not experience pedicle screw cutout nor pseudarthrosis and had significantly fewer VECs than those without early TBR. Thus, TBR may be a new radiological marker of initial fixation after PLIF.

Pedicle Screw Fixation With Cement Augmentation Versus Without in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis Following Posterior Spinal Fusion Surgery, Superiority According to Bone Mineral Density: A Three-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether cement augmentation has an impact on clinical and radiologic outcomes following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in low-density bones and whether its performance is comparable to regular bone density.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2021, 114 patients with spinal canal stenosis were enrolled to undergo PSF. They were initially stratified based on their bone mineral density: T-score ≥ -1.5: Group I (n = 34), and T-score < -1.5: Group II (n = 80). Furthermore, group II was randomly subdivided: II-A (unaugmented, n = 35) and II-B (bone cement augmented, n = 45). The primary and secondary endpoints of the study were evaluated using visual analog scales (VAS) and radiologic parameters, including screw loosening, screw or rod fractures, proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional vertebral fracture (PJVF), and adjacent segment disease (ASD), at 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

All 3 groups showed improvement in VAS scores, but the most significant improvements were seen in groups I and II-B. Group II-B had lower incidence rates of ASD, PJVF, PJK, rod, and screw fracture compared to group II-A, but only screw loosening was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Contrary, there were statistically significant differences in all variables except for ASD and screw fracture (P = 0.0576 and 0.670, respectively) when comparing groups I and II-A. In both groups I and II-A, screw loosening was the most common complication following PSF, while only 5.41% of patients in group II-B experienced it.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of cement augmentation in mitigating pain and screw loosening following PSF surgery in low-density bones is comparable to that of normal-density bone.

A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF)

PURPOSE

The rate of elective lumbar fusion has continued to increase over the past two decades. However, there remains to be a consensus on the optimal fusion technique. This study aims to compare stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with posterior fusion techniques in patients with spondylolisthesis and degenerative disc disease through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by searching the Cochrane Register of Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception to 2022. In the two-stage screening process, three reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts. The full-text reports of the remaining studies were then inspected for eligibility. Conflicts were resolved through consensus discussion. Two reviewers then extracted study data, assessed it for quality, and analysed it.

RESULTS

After the initial search and removal of duplicate records, 16,435 studies were screened. Twenty-one eligible studies (3686 patients) were ultimately included, which compared stand-alone ALIF with posterior approaches such as posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF). A meta-analysis showed surgical time and blood loss was significantly lower in ALIF than in TLIF/PLIF, but not in those who underwent PLF (p = 0.08). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in ALIF than in TLIF, but not in PLIF or PLF. Fusion rates were similar between the ALIF and posterior approaches. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain were not significantly different between the ALIF and PLIF/TLIF groups. However, VAS back pain favoured ALIF over PLF at one year (n = 21, MD - 1.00, CI - 1.47, - 0.53), and at two years (2 studies, n = 67, MD - 1.39, CI - 1.67, - 1.11). The VAS leg pain scores (n = 46, MD 0.50, CI 0.12 to 0.88) at two years significantly favoured PLF. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores at one year were not significantly different between ALIF and the posterior approaches. At two years, ODI scores were also similar between the ALIF and the TLIF/PLIF. However, the ODI scores at two years (2 studies, n = 67, MD - 7.59, CI - 13.33, - 1.85) significantly favoured ALIF over PLF (I2 = 70%). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (JOAS) for low back pain at one year (n = 21, MD - 0.50, CI - 0.78) and two years (two studies, n = 67, MD - 0.36, CI - 0.65, - 0.07) significantly favoured ALIF over PLF. No significant differences were found in leg pain at the 2-year follow-up. Adverse events displayed no significant differences between the ALIF and posterior approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Stand-alone-ALIF demonstrated a shorter operative time and less blood loss than the PLIF/TLIF approach. Hospitalisation time is reduced with ALIF compared with TLIF. Patient-reported outcome measures were equivocal with PLIF or TLIF. VAS and JOAS, back pain, and ODI scores mainly favoured ALIF over PLF. Adverse events were equivocal between the ALIF and posterior fusion approaches.

Perioperative Clinical Features and Long-term Prognosis After Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF), OLIF With Anterolateral Screw Fixation, or OLIF With Percutaneous Pedicle Fixation: A Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), OLIF combined with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF), and OLIF combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF) in the treatment of single-level or 2-level degenerative lumbar disease.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and 2021, 71 patients were treated with OLIF and combined OLIF. The demographic data, clinical outcomes, radiographic outcomes, and complications were compared among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

The operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the OLIF (p<0.05) and OLIF-AF (p<0.05) groups were lower than in the OLIF-PF group. Posterior disk height improvement in the OLIF-PF group was better than in the OLIF (p<0.05) and OLIF-AF (p<0.05) groups. In terms of foraminal height (FH), the OLIF-PF group was significantly better than the OLIF group (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the OLIF-PF and OLIF-AF groups (p>0.05) or between the OLIF and OLIF-AF groups (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in fusion rates, the incidence of complications, lumbar lordosis, anterior disc height, and cross-sectional area among the 3 groups (p>0.05). The OLIF-PF group had significantly lower rates of subsidence than the OLIF group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

OLIF remains a viable option with similar patient-reported outcomes and fusion rates compared with surgeries that include lateral and posterior internal fixation while greatly reducing the financial burden, intraoperative time, and intraoperative blood loss. OLIF has a higher subsidence rate than lateral and posterior internal fixation, but most subsidence is mild and has no adverse effect on clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of lumbar spinal stenosis, 2021 - Secondary publication

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) guideline for the management of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) was first published in 2011. Since then, the medical care system for LSS has changed and many new articles regarding the epidemiology and diagnostics of LSS, conservative treatments such as new pharmacotherapy and physical therapy, and surgical treatments including minimally invasive surgery have been published. In addition, various issues need to be examined, such as verification of patient-reported outcome measures, and the economic effect of revised medical management of patients with lumbar spinal disorders. Accordingly, in 2019 the JOA clinical guidelines committee decided to update the guideline and consequently established a formulation committee. The purpose of this study was to describe the formulation we implemented for the revision of the guideline, incorporating the recent advances of evidence-based medicine.

METHODS

The JOA LSS guideline formulation committee revised the previous guideline based on the method for preparing clinical guidelines in Japan proposed by the Medical Information Network Distribution Service in 2017. Background and clinical questions were determined followed by a literature search related to each question. Appropriate articles based on keywords were selected from all the searched literature. Using prepared structured abstracts, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were performed. The strength of evidence and recommendations for each clinical question was decided by the committee members.

RESULTS

Eight background and 15 clinical questions were determined. Answers and explanations were described for the background questions. For each clinical question, the strength of evidence and the recommendation were both decided, and an explanation was provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of LSS was completed according to the latest evidence-based medicine. We expect that this guideline will be useful for all medical providers as an index in daily medical care, as well as for patients with LSS.

Translucent Zone Between Autograft and Endplate Two Months Postoperatively Is an Independent Predictor of Delayed Osseous Union in Elderly Patients With Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery

Background Delayed union or pseudoarthrosis after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is associated with poor outcomes in health-related quality of life. Therefore, it is important to achieve earlier solid fusion for a successful clinical outcome after PLIF. A few authors reported that biomechanical factors may influence spinal fusion rates. The purpose of our retrospective study was to evaluate the independent predictors of delayed osseous union related to intraoperative procedures of PLIF, and to find ways to reduce delayed osseous union. Methods This was a retrospective study of a completed trial. We reviewed 66 elderly patients with osteoporosis after PLIF (all female, mean age 71 years, follow-up period over 6 months). Lumbar computed tomography scans at 2 months postoperatively were examined for the presence of a translucent zone between autograft and endplate (more than 50% of vertebral diameter), and autograft position with bone bridging (anterior, central, or posterior). Osseous union was assessed by using computed tomography 6 months postoperatively. Results Thirty-three patients (50%) showed complete osseous union, while 33 did not. A translucent zone between autograft and endplate two months postoperatively was observed in nine patients (27%) in the union group and in 23 (70%) in the nonunion group (p<0.01). Autograft position with bone bridging two months postoperatively was anterior, central, and posterior in 17 (52%), 30 (91%), and 20 patients (61%) in the union group, and in 12 (36%), 20 (61%), and seven patients (21%) in the nonunion group (p=0.22, p<0.01, and p<0.01), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of a translucent zone between autograft and endplate (odds ratio, 0.101; 95% confidence interval: 0.026-0.398; p<0.01) and teriparatide administration (odds ratio, 8.810; 95% confidence interval: 2.222-34.936; p<0.01) were independently associated with osseous union after PLIF. Conclusions A translucent zone between autograft and endplate at two months postoperatively independently predicted delayed osseous union within six months after PLIF. Complete osseous union rates were higher in patients with posterior bone bridging two months postoperatively than in those without. These findings apart from preoperative predictors of osseous union might serve as indicators of how intraoperative techniques affects osseous union enhancement.

Comparison of Fusion Rate and Functional Outcome Between Local Cancellous Bone Plus Demineralized Bone Matrix and Local Bone in 1-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study with prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the difference in fusion rate and clinical outcome of patients with local bone as filler for the graft and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) plus only the cancellous bone from local bone as a filler for cage in 1-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with cage.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cancellous bone is more advantageous than cortical bone in the local bone for improving bone formation in spine fusion surgery. There are little studies on the difference in fusion rate and reduction of fusion time using only these cancellous bones.

METHODS

Of the 40 patients who underwent 1-level PLIF using cage, 20 patients in group A used local bone and 20 patients in group B used mixture of cancellous bone extracted separately from local bone and commercially available DBM as filler for cage. Changes in fusion rate and intervertebral spacing were measured using lateral radiography, and fusion was determined as nonunion using the Brantigan-Steffee classification. The clinical outcome was evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no difference in height change over time between the two groups. Regarding union grade, group B showed better union grade than group A. However, no difference in union grade change over time was observed between the 2 groups. In group B, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and SF-36 mental component score (MCS) significantly decreased, but there was no difference in change over time.

CONCLUSIONS

In 1-level PLIF for degenerative lumbar disease, better fusion rate was observed in the group that used only cancellous bone from local bone plus DBM than that in the group that used local bone; however, there was no difference in fusion grade change over time in the 2 groups.

Comparison of Short-Term Radiographical and Clinical Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a 3D Porous Titanium Alloy Cage and a Titanium-Coated PEEK Cage

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical case series.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the short-term (≤1 year) radiographical and clinical outcomes between posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with a titanium-coated poly-ether-ether-ketone (TCP) cage and PLIF with a three-dimensional porous titanium alloy (PTA) cage.

METHODS

Overall, 63 patients who had undergone 1- or 2-level PLIF since March 2015 were enrolled (median age, 71 years). The first 34 patients underwent PLIF with TCP cages (until June 2017) and the next 29 patients with PTA cages. Fusion status, vertebral endplate cyst formation (cyst sign: grade 0, none; grade 1, focal; and grade 2, diffuse), cage subsidence (grade 0, <1 mm; grade 1, 1-3 mm; and grade 2, >3 mm), and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes based on the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were compared at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively between the 2 cage groups.

RESULTS

Cyst sign and cage subsidence grades were significantly lower in the PTA cage group than in the TCP cage group at 6 months postoperatively (cyst sign, p = 0.044; cage subsidence, p = 0.043). In contrast, the fusion rate and surgery effectiveness based on JOABPEQ at both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively were not different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-reported QOL outcomes were similar between the TCP and PTA cage groups until 1 year postoperatively. However, a higher incidence and severity of postoperative vertebral endplate cyst formation in patients with the TCP cage was a noteworthy radiographical finding.

Impact of Early Intervertebral Osseous Union After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Health-Related Quality of Life

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Nonunion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is associated with poor improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We aimed to investigate the influence of early osseous union after PLIF on HRQOL.

METHODS

We reviewed 138 patients with 1-level PLIF (mean age 67 years, follow-up period ≥1 year). Postoperative lumbar computed tomography was performed to assess screw loosening and intervertebral union. HRQOL was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (28%) showed complete union at 6 months postoperatively (early union group). Twenty-eight patients (20%) showed complete union at 6 to 12 months postoperatively (delayed union group), while 71 patients demonstrated noncomplete union. Effective improvement of lumbar spine dysfunction and psychological disorders was achieved in 19 (63.3%) and 17 (50.0%) patients in the early union group, in 9 (42.9%) and 14 (53.8%) patients in the delayed union group, and in 22 (34.9%) and 19 (29.2%) patients in the nonunion group, respectively (P = .036 and P = .036, respectively). The nonunion group had a significantly higher proportion of cases with screw loosening at 6 and 12 months postoperatively than the complete union group (P = .033 and P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar spine dysfunction and psychological disorders improved in cases with early complete union compared to those with nonunion. Screw loosening occurred in cases with nonunion predominantly from 6 months postoperatively. Therefore, the achievement of early complete union might be helpful for better HRQOL and lower incidence of postoperative complications.

Preclinical Safety of a 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite-Demineralized Bone Matrix Scaffold for Spinal Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled preclinical study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the host inflammatory response of our previously described hyperelastic, 3D-printed (3DP) hydroxyapatite (HA)-demineralized bone matrix (DBM) composite scaffold to the response elicited with the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in a preclinical rat posterolateral lumbar fusion model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Our group previously found that this 3D-printed HA-DBM composite material shows promise as a bone graft substitute in a preclinical rodent model, but its safety profile had yet to be assessed.

METHODS

Sixty female Sprague-Dawley rats underwent bilateral posterolateral intertransverse lumbar spinal fusion using with the following implants: 1) type I absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) alone; 2) 10 μg rhBMP-2/ACS; or 3) the 3DP HA-DBM composite scaffold (n = 20). The host inflammatory response was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging, while the local and circulating cytokine expression levels were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays at subsequent postoperative time points (N = 5/time point).

RESULTS

At both 2 and 5 days postoperatively, treatment with the HA-DBM scaffold produced significantly less soft tissue edema at the fusion bed site relative to rhBMP-2-treated animals as quantified on magnetic resonance imaging. At every postoperative time point evaluated, the level of soft tissue edema in HA-DBM-treated animals was comparable to that of the ACS control group. At 2 days postoperatively, serum concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-α and macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 were significantly elevated in the rhBMP-2 treatment group relative to ACS controls, whereas these cytokines were not elevated in the HA-DBM-treated animals.

CONCLUSION

The 3D-printed HA-DBM composite induces a significantly reduced host inflammatory response in a preclinical spinal fusion model relative to rhBMP-2.Level of Evidence: N/A.

Bone Metabolism in the Healing Process of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Temporal Changes of Bone Turnover Markers

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate temporal changes of bone turnover markers (BTMs) after lumbar spinal fusion in patients without osteoporosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Radiological studies are the standard method to monitor bony fusion, but they do not allow a timely assessment of bone healing. BTMs react rapidly to changes in bone metabolism during fusion process and could be an additional tool to monitor this process.

METHODS

A total of 78 nonosteoporosis patients who had undergone one- or two-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion were included. Fusion status was assessed using computed tomography sagittal and coronal images. Serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP), and osteocalcin (OC) were measured to assess bone formation, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) was measured to assess bone resorption. Serum samples were obtained before surgery and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

A solid fusion was achieved in 71 of 78 patients (91%), and seven patients resulted in pseudarthrosis. In the fusion group, the level of all BTMs once decreased at 1 postoperative week. Then, BAP and P1NP reached a peak at 4 weeks after surgery, and TRACP-5b and OC peaked at 8 weeks. Thereafter, the level of P1NP and TRACP-5b gradually got closer to the baseline over a year, and BAP kept high until 52 postoperative weeks. In the pseudarthrosis group, peak level of BTMs was significantly higher and the increased level of BAP and P1NP was kept until 52 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated dynamics of BTMs after lumbar spinal fusion in patients without osteoporosis. These normal population data contribute as a baseline to evaluate the effect of osteogenic agents on bone metabolism after spinal fusion.Level of Evidence: 2.

Outcomes of the use of cement-augmented cannulated pedicle screws in lumbar spinal fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

There are few studies of the radio-clinical outcomes of cement-augmented cannulated pedicle screw (CPS) fixation in osteoporotic patients.

PURPOSE

To compare the radiological and clinical outcomes between groups receiving cement-augmented CPS and solid pedicle screws (SPS) in lumbar fusion surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective comparative study PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 187 patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis from 2014 to 2019.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiological evaluation included screw failure, cage failure, rod breakage, and fusion grade at postoperative 6 months and 1 year. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scales for back pain (VAS-BP), leg pain (VAS-LP), Korean Oswestry disability index (K-ODI), and postoperative complications were also compared.

METHODS

Outcomes of patients with high risk factors for implant failure [old age, osteoporosis, autoimmune disease or chronic kidney disease (CKD)] who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cement-augmented CPS fixation (Group C, n=55) or SPS fixation (Group S, n=132) were compared.

RESULTS

324 pedicle screws in Group C and 775 pedicle screws in Group S were analyzed. Group C had a significantly higher average age and lower T-score, and included more patients with autoimmune disease and CKD than group S (all p<.05). Clear zones, screw migration and loss of correction were significantly less frequent in Group C (all p<.05). Thirteen screw breakages were observed; they were only in Group C (4.0%) and all were in the proximal of the two holes. Interbody and posterolateral fusion rates were not significantly different. At last follow-up, all clinical parameters including VAS-BP, VAS-LP, and K-ODI scores had improved significantly in both groups. Postoperative complications were not significantly different in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In lumbar fusion surgery, using cement-augmented CPS in high-risk groups for implant failure could be a useful technical option for reducing acute radiological complications and obtaining clinical results comparable to those obtained using SPS in patients with low risk of implant failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines for Perioperative Spine: Preoperative Nutritional Assessment

BACKGROUND

Preoperative malnutrition has been implicated in adverse events after elective surgery, potentially impacting patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

As a potentially modifiable risk factor, we sought to determine which assessments of nutritional status were associated with specific adverse events after spine surgery. In addition, we explored if a preoperative nutritional improvement intervention may be beneficial in lowering the rates of these adverse events.

METHODS

The literature search yielded 115 abstracts relevant to the PICO (patient/population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) questions included in this chapter. The task force selected 105 articles for full text review, and 13 met criteria for inclusion in this systematic review.

RESULTS

Malnutrition, assessed preoperatively by a serum albumin <3.5 g/dL or a serum prealbumin <20 mg/dL, is associated with a higher rate of surgical site infections (SSIs), other wound complications, nonunions, hospital readmissions, and other medical complications after spine surgery. A multimodal nutrition management protocol decreases albumin and electrolyte deficiencies in patients with normal preoperative nutritional status. It also improves overall complication rates but does not specifically impact SSIs.

CONCLUSION

It is recommended to assess nutritional status using either serum albumin or prealbumin preoperatively in patients undergoing spine surgery.The full guidelines can be accessed at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/4-preoperative-nutritional-assessment.

Factors Affecting Incomplete L5/S Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Including Spinopelvic Sagittal Parameters

Study Design

Retrospective observational study.

Purpose

In this study we identify risk factors, including patient demographics, sagittal parameters, and clinical examinations, affecting incomplete L5/S posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

Overview of Literature

The lumbosacral spine is considered to have an interbody fusion rate lower than that of the lumbar spine, but few studies have investigated the cause, including investigating the pelvis. We believe that pelvic morphology can affect L5/S interbody fusion of the lumbosacral spine.

Methods

We observed 141 patients (61 men, 80 women; average age, 65.8 years) who had undergone PLIF and checked for the presence of L5/S interbody fusion. We investigated factors such as age, gender, the presence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), fusion level, and grade 2 osteotomy, as well as pre-, post-, and post-preoperative L5/S disk height and angle, lumbar lordosis, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and pelvic incidence (PI), comparing those with and without L5/S interbody fusion. In addition, we analyzed the patients classified into short-level (n=111) and multi-level fusion groups (n=30).

Results

Overall, the L5/S interbody fusion rate was 70% (short-level, 78%; multi-level, 40%). Age and pre- and post-preoperative L5/S disk angle were significantly different in each fusion level group. DISH presence, grade 2 osteotomy, and postoperative VAS and JOA scores were significantly different in the short-level fusion group, whereas PI was significantly different in the multi-level fusion group.

Conclusions

Incomplete union after L5/S PLIF correlates with advanced age, many fusion levels, and a large value of preoperative and a small value of post-preoperative L5/S disk angles.

Good clinical outcomes in nonunion cases after facet fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

There are many satisfactory long-term outcomes after posterolateral fusion (PLF) for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS); nonunion cases have also achieved good clinical outcomes. Facet fusion (FF), a minimally invasive evolution of PLF, also resulted in good clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess the course of nonunion cases after FF and determine whether the nonunion cases achieved good clinical outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 136 patients who underwent FF for DLS. Range of motion (ROM) at the fused level was measured using a flexion-extension lateral radiograph preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were classified into the Fusion or Unconfirmed Fusion group by computed tomography (CT) 1 year postoperatively. Furthermore, patients in the Unconfirmed Fusion group were classified into the Delayed Union or Nonunion group depending on the confirmation status of FF upon the following CT. The average preoperative ROM and clinical outcomes were compared between the three groups. The Fusion, Delayed Union, and Nonunion groups had 109, 14, and 13 patients, respectively. In the Nonunion group, the average ROM significantly decreased from 13.0° preoperatively to 4.9° postoperatively. There was a significant difference in the average preoperative ROM between the groups. The larger the preoperative ROM, the fewer facets fused. There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups. Five patients (3.7%) required revision surgery for adjacent segment disease 1-5.5 years after FF. Even nonunion cases after FF achieved good clinical outcomes, likely because the unstable spondylolisthesis was stabilized. FF did not require revision surgery for nonunion itself.

Two-level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at the Lumbosacral Segment has a High Risk of Pseudarthrosis and Poor Clinical Outcomes: Comparison Between the Lumbar and Lumbosacral Segments

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to investigate the fusion rate and clinical outcomes of 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PLIF provides favorable clinical outcomes and a high fusion rate. However, most extant studies have been limited to the results of single-level PLIF. Clinical outcomes and fusion rate of 2-level PLIF are unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 73 patients who underwent 2-level PLIF below L3 between 2008 and 2016 (follow-up period >2 y) were included. Patients were divided into the 2 groups on the basis of surgical level. The lumbar group included 48 patients who underwent L3/4/5 PLIF, and the lumbosacral group included 25 patients who underwent L4/5/S PLIF. Fusion rate and clinical outcomes were compared. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and a visual analog scale were used for evaluation.

RESULTS

Fusion rate was significantly lower in the lumbosacral group (lumbar 96% vs. lumbosacral 64%; P<0.001). Eight of 9 cases of pseudarthrosis occurred at the lumbosacral segment. Improvement in the mental health domain of the JOAPEQ was significantly lower in the lumbosacral group (lumbar 16 vs. lumbosacral 10; P=0.02). The VAS data showed that improvements in the following variables were significantly lower in the lumbosacral group than in the lumbar group: pain in low back (lumbar -38 vs. lumbosacral -23; P=0.004), pain in buttocks or lower leg (lumbar -48 vs. lumbosacral -29; P=0.04), and numbness in buttocks or lower leg (lumbar -44 vs. lumbosacral -33; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-level PLIF at the lumbosacral segment demonstrated a significantly lower fusion rate and poorer clinical outcomes than that at the lumbar-only segments. Some reinforcement for the sacral anchor is recommended to improve fusion rate, even for short fusion like 2-level PLIF, if the lumbosacral segment is included.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Impact of sufficient contact between the autograft and endplate soon after surgery to prevent nonunion at 12 months following posterior lumbar interbody fusion

OBJECTIVE

Nonunion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is associated with poor long-term outcomes in terms of health-related quality of life. Biomechanical factors in the fusion segment may influence spinal fusion rates. There are no reports on the relationship between intervertebral union and the absorption of autografts or vertebral endplates. Therefore, the purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the risk factors of nonunion after PLIF and identify preventive measures.

METHODS

The authors analyzed 138 patients who underwent 1-level PLIF between 2016 and 2018 (75 males, 63 females; mean age 67 years; minimum follow-up period 12 months). Lumbar CT images obtained soon after the surgery and at 6 and 12 months of follow-up were examined for the mean total occupancy rate of the autograft, presence of a translucent zone between the autograft and endplate (more than 50% of vertebral diameter), cage subsidence, and screw loosening. Complete intervertebral union was defined as the presence of both upper and lower complete fusion in the center cage regions on coronal and sagittal CT slices at 12 months postoperatively. Patients were classified into either union or nonunion groups.

RESULTS

Complete union after PLIF was observed in 62 patients (45%), while nonunion was observed in 76 patients (55%). The mean total occupancy rate of the autograft immediately after the surgery was higher in the union group than in the nonunion group (59% vs 53%; p = 0.046). At 12 months postoperatively, the total occupancy rate of the autograft had decreased by 5.4% in the union group and by 11.9% in the nonunion group (p = 0.020). A translucent zone between the autograft and endplate immediately after the surgery was observed in 14 and 38 patients (23% and 50%) in the union and nonunion groups, respectively (p = 0.001). The nonunion group had a significantly higher proportion of cases with cage subsidence and screw loosening at 12 months postoperatively in comparison to the union group (p = 0.010 and p = 0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower occupancy rate of the autograft and the presence of a translucent zone between the autograft and endplate immediately after the surgery were associated with nonunion at 12 months after PLIF. It may be important to achieve sufficient contact between the autograft and endplate intraoperatively for osseous union enhancement and to avoid excessive absorption of the autograft. The achievement of complete intervertebral union may decrease the incidence of cage subsidence or screw loosening.

Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery

BACKGROUNDS

Disadvantages of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages are their smooth and hydrophobic surfaces and their lack of osteoconductivity. Titanium (Ti) coated PEEK cage has been innovated to overcome these potential concerns. However, few well-designed studies have investigated the efficacy of Ti-coated PEEK cage on interbody fusion in humans. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Ti coating on bone ongrowth at bone-implant surface by simultaneously comparing Ti-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in the same intervertebral space.

METHODS

This study is a prospective comparative study for the two different cages. Twenty-six subjects who underwent one-level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) were included. Two PEEK cages [a plasma-sprayed Ti-coated (PTC-PEEK) and an uncoated PEEK cage] were inserted in the same intervertebral space. Fusion rates, cage subsidence, and vertebral cancellous condensation (VCC) around the cage, which indicates bone growth on the surface of each cage, were assessed by thin-slice computed tomography (CT) immediately (within 1 week) and at 3 months postoperatively. A functional radiograph was obtained at 3 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-three subjects showed solid fusion at 3 months postoperatively (fusion rate, 88%). Cage subsidence was not observed. VCC was often observed around the PTC-PEEK cage as evaluated by completely synchronized CT images between immediately and at 3 months postoperatively. Quantified VCC around the cage was significantly larger in the PTC-PEEK cage than in the uncoated PEEK cage (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The Ti-coated PEEK cage exhibits radiographic signs, suggesting bone ongrowth, as represented by VCC around the cage compared with that around the uncoated PEEK cage. The Ti-coated PEEK cage has the potential to promote solid fusion and to improve clinical outcomes in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

Potential significance of facet joint fusion or posteromedial fusion observed on CT imaging following attempted posterolateral or posterior interbody fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Radiologic evidence of successful lumbar fusion has traditionally been based on bridging bone spanning the intertransverse processes (posterolateral fusion or PLF) or disc space (interbody fusion, or IBF). Often, postoperative computed tomography (CT) of unsuccessful PLF and IBF demonstrates bridging bone across the facet joints or connecting the medial transverse process to the ipsilateral superior articular facet of the caudal vertebra. The significance of this finding in terms of implant stability and clinical outcomes has not previously been reported.

PURPOSE

To determine rates of facet joint fusion (FJF)/posteromedial fusion (PMF) following single-level PLF surgery, with or without interbody. A secondary goal was to determine comparative outcomes associated with isolated FJF/PMF versus PLF and IBF.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective CT-based review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred-three patients underwent single-level PLF surgery with local autograft bone or PLF+IBF with local autograft bone.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Fusion was assessed at 6-months and 12-months postoperatively using strict CT criteria. Patient reported outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and SF-36.

METHODS

Thin-cut CTs were examined to determine whether successful fusion had occurred in seven different anatomic locations. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine significant differences in mean outcome scores and other continuous measures between groups at baseline and follow-up. Chi-square test of independence or Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportions between groups on categorical measures.

RESULTS

Two hundred-three patients and 157 patients completed 6- and 12 month follow-up, respectively. At 12 months, 35.1% of PLF patients demonstrated successful unilateral/bilateral PLF. Including unilateral or bilateral FJF/PMF, the fusion rate was 73.4%. Among PLF+IBF patients, 38.1% demonstrated successful IBF/PLF. Including unilateral or bilateral FJF/PMF, the fusion rate was 55.6%. All fusion groups demonstrated significant improvement in back pain and leg pain scores as well as ODI and SF-36 PF at 6- and 12 months compared with pre-op. No significant difference in any outcome measure, rates of implant loosening or reoperation was observed between successful PLF/IBF and FJF/PMF groups.

CONCLUSIONS

FJF/PMF is often observed on postoperative CT evaluation following surgery originally performed to achieve PLF or IBF. Short-term follow-up suggests no significant difference in implant loosening rates or patient reported outcomes when FJF/PMF is observed versus PLF or IBF in such patients. Long-term clinical outcomes of FJF/PMF versus PLF or IBF remain unknown. These findings apply solely to single-level instrumented spinal fusion surgery utilizing pedicle screws with or without IBF.

Influence of novel design alteration of pedicle screw on pull-out strength: A finite element study

BACKGROUND

We conducted a finite element study to assess the effectiveness of a novel pedicle screw design with two alterations in the distal and proximal portions.

METHODS

Finite element (FE) models of 24 vertebrae were constructed using computed tomographic data. Pull-out strength of 4 different pedicle screws were compared. The basic screw design was a dual threaded one (PS0), in which the proximal portion is double-threaded (cortical thread), and the distal portion is single-threaded (cancellous thread). In PS1, the inter-thread double-core shape was added to PS0 in the distal portion. Compared to PS0, in PS2, the proximal portion was elongated by 5 mm. PS3 had both PS1 and PS2 features. In addition, the 24 vertebrae were classified into 3 groups based on volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the vertebral body: low <120 mg/cm³, moderate 120-170 mg/cm³, and high >170 mg/cm³.

RESULTS

The mean pull-out strengths (±SD) were 1137 ± 500 N, 1188 ± 520 N, 1191 ± 512 N, and 1242 ± 538 N for PS0, PS1, PS2, and PS3, respectively. In PS1, there was significant difference in the incremental ratio of pull-out strength to PS0 between the low and high vBMD groups (3.7 ± 1.6% vs. 5.0 ± 1.0%, p = 0.006). In PS2, there was a significant difference in the incremental ratio to PS0 between the moderate and high vBMD groups (7.6 ± 4.0% vs. 3.3 ± 1.8%, p < 0.001). In PS3, there was a significant difference in the incremental ratio to PS0 between the moderate and high vBMD groups (12.1 ± 4.8% vs. 8.5 ± 2.1%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The two design alterations showed the combined additive effect in the PS3 design. The moderate vBMD group has a balanced bone property to reflect the combined effects of the PS1 and PS2 design alterations.

Weekly Teriparatide Administration and Preoperative Anterior Slippage of the Cranial Vertebra Next to Fusion Segment < 2 mm Promote Osseous Union After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the independent predictors of osseous union after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PLIF is usually performed to treat lumbar degenerative diseases in elderly patients. Some patients exhibit intervertebral pseudoarthrosis.

METHODS

We analyzed 66 elderly patients with osteoporosis who underwent PLIF from 2011 to 2014 (all women, mean age 71 years, follow-up period ≥6 months). Patients were randomly allocated to receive either treatment with weekly teriparatide, starting at 1 week postoperatively, or no teriparatide. Preoperative lumbar spine radiographs were obtained, and the amount of anterior slippage was measured. Osseous union was assessed by computed tomography at 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (50%) showed complete osseous union, while 33 did not. Teriparatide was administered in 20 (61%) patients of the union group and in 9 (27%) patients of the nonunion group (P < 0.01). The preoperative anterior slippage of the cranial vertebra next to fusion segment < 2 mm was observed in 16 (49%) and 4 (12%) patients in the union and nonunion groups, respectively (P < 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis showed that teriparatide administration (odds ratio, 4.75; 95% confidence interval: 1.51-14.90; P < 0.01) and preoperative anterior slippage of the cranial vertebra next to fusion segment < 2 mm (odds ratio, 5.90; 95% confidence interval: 1.53-22.70; P < 0.01) were independently associated with osseous union within 6 months after PLIF. At 6 months postoperatively, the mean femoral neck bone mineral density significantly increased by 1.1% in the union group and decreased by 1.3% in the nonunion group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Weekly teriparatide administration and preoperative anterior slippage of the cranial vertebra next to fusion segment < 2 mm were independent predictors of osseous union within 6 months after PLIF. Our findings suggest that biological and mechanical factors may influence the improvement of spinal fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Effect of osteoporosis on the clinical and radiological outcomes following one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion

BACKGROUND

Cage subsidence or pedicle screw loosening following lumbar fusion surgery is frequently reported in osteoporotic patients. However, few studies have analyzed clinical as well as radiological outcomes after such surgeries as a function of bone mineral density. We aimed to evaluate the impact of osteoporosis on the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).

METHODS

Fifty-five non-osteoporotic (T-score ≥ -1.0) and 31 osteoporotic (T-score ≤ -2.5) patients who underwent one-level PLIF were followed up for >2 years. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) parameters were assessed. Fusion success was identified with dynamic plain radiographs and computed tomography. Pedicle screw loosening and cage subsidence were evaluated. The clinical and radiological parameters were compared between osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic patients. Subgroup analysis was performed on cage subsidence or screw loosening.

RESULTS

Although VAS score for back pain was higher in osteoporotic patients than in non-osteoporotic patients at 6 months postoperatively (3.3 vs. 2.2, P = 0.062), this difference disappeared at 1 year postoperatively (2.9 vs. 2.5, P = 0.606). However, no differences were noted between the groups in ODI and EQ-5D grades. Cage subsidence (65.4% vs. 17.6%, P < 0.001) and screw loosening rates (32.3% vs. 12.7%, P = 0.029) were significantly higher in osteoporotic patients than in non-osteoporotic patients, but fusion rate did not differ between the groups. Although clinical outcomes did not differ between those who had cage subsidence or screw loosening and those who did not, fusion rate was lower in those who showed screw loosening than those who did not (71.4% vs. 93.9%, P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher cage subsidence and pedicle screw loosening rates in osteoporotic patients did not significantly affect the clinical outcomes, but screw loosening, which occurred more frequently in older patients, significantly reduced the fusion success rate. Thus, PLIF procedure may be a good surgical treatment option to achieve good clinical outcomes, even in osteoporotic patients despite higher rates of cage subsidence and pedicle screw loosening. However, surgeons should monitor screw loosening because of its significant association with non-union.

Hounsfield unit of screw trajectory as a predictor of pedicle screw loosening after single level lumbar interbody fusion

OBJECT

This study aims to clarify the clinical potential of Hounsfield unit (HU), measured on computed tomography (CT) images, as a predictor of pedicle screw (PS) loosening, compared to bone mineral density (BMD).

METHODS

A total of 206 screws in 52 patients (21 men and 31 women; mean age 68.2 years) were analyzed retrospectively. The screws were classified into two groups depending on their screw loosening status on 3-month follow-up CT (loosening screw group vs. non-loosening screw group). Preoperative HU of the trajectory was evaluated by superimposing preoperative and postoperative CT images using three-dimensional image analysis software. Age, sex, body mass index, screw size, BMD of lumbar, and HU of screw trajectory were analyzed in association with screw loosening. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, and the thresholds for PS loosening risk factors were evaluated using a continuous numerical variable and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to determine the diagnostic performance, and values > 0.75 were considered to represent good performance.

RESULTS

The loosening screw group contained 24 screws (12%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the significant independent risk factors were not BMD but male sex [P = 0.028; odds ratio (OR) 2.852, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.120-7.258] and HU of screw trajectory (P = 0.006; OR 0.989, 95% CI 0.980-0.997). ROC curve analysis demonstrated that the AUC for HU of screw trajectory for women was 0.880 (95% CI 0.798-0.961). The cutoff value was 153.5. AUC for men was 0.635 (95% CI 0.449-0.821), which was not considered to be a good performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Low HU of screw trajectories was identified as a risk factor of PS loosening for women. For female patients with low HU, additional augmentation is recommended to prevent PS loosening.

The Biological Enhancement of Spinal Fusion for Spinal Degenerative Disease

In this era of aging societies, the number of elderly individuals who undergo spinal arthrodesis for various degenerative diseases is increasing. Poor bone quality and osteogenic ability in older patients, due to osteoporosis, often interfere with achieving bone fusion after spinal arthrodesis. Enhancement of bone fusion requires shifting bone homeostasis toward increased bone formation and reduced resorption. Several biological enhancement strategies of bone formation have been conducted in animal models of spinal arthrodesis and human clinical trials. Pharmacological agents for osteoporosis have also been shown to be effective in enhancing bone fusion. Cytokines, which activate bone formation, such as bone morphogenetic proteins, have already been clinically used to enhance bone fusion for spinal arthrodesis. Recently, stem cells have attracted considerable attention as a cell source of osteoblasts, promising effects in enhancing bone fusion. Drug delivery systems will also need to be further developed to assure the safe delivery of bone-enhancing agents to the site of spinal arthrodesis. Our aim in this review is to appraise the current state of knowledge and evidence regarding bone enhancement strategies for spinal fusion for degenerative spinal disorders, and to identify future directions for biological bone enhancement strategies, including pharmacological, cell and gene therapy approaches.

Revision Surgery for Short Segment Fusion Influences Postoperative Low Back Pain and Lower Extremity Pain: A Retrospective Single-Center Study of Patient-Based Evaluation

Introduction

Patients treated with revision surgery after lumbar decompression with fusion typically have persistent low back pain and lower extremity numbness compared with patients treated with only primary surgery. No well-designed study has investigated the persistence and degree of pain after revision surgery following instrumented operation. The purpose of this study is to compare residual pain among patients who underwent reoperation and those who underwent only primary surgery for lumbar degenerative disorder using patient-based evaluation.

Methods

We reviewed 350 consecutive patients (143 men, 207 women, mean age 63 years) treated with primary lumbar instrumented surgery between October 2010 and February 2014 at our institution and followed up for ≥2 years postoperatively. Patients were categorized into three groups based on number of levels fused: 1-segment, 2-segment, and ≥3-segment fusion (1F, 2F, and ≥3F groups, respectively). We used the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and visual analog scales (VASs) for low back pain and lower extremity pain to evaluate pain intensity pre- and postoperatively.

Results

Salvage surgery for late-phase complications was required in 5 cases (2.4%), 6 cases (11.3%), and 11 cases (12.1%) in the 1F, 2F, and ≥3F groups, respectively. In the 1F and 2F groups, patients treated with revision surgery had unsatisfactory improvement in the pain domain of JOABPEQ and VASs for low back pain and lower extremity pain compared with patients with only primary short fusion surgery. The ≥3F group showed no significant differences between patients who underwent reoperation and those who underwent only primary surgery.

Conclusion

Low back pain and lower extremity pain often persist after revision surgery in patients treated with short fusion (≤2-segment) operation. We need to follow pain states in such patients.

The Impact of L5 Sacralization on Fusion Rates and Clinical Outcomes After Single-level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) at L4-L5 Level

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of L5 sacralization on fusion rates and clinical outcomes after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery at the L4-L5 level.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

L5 sacralization can produce greater stress concentration at the adjacent segment (L4-L5); therefore, L4-L5 PLIF surgery in patients with L5 sacralization may negatively affect fusion rate and be associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, no study has examined the impact of L5 sacralization on fusion rates and clinical outcomes of patients who undergo L4-L5 PLIF surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 153 patients who underwent L4-L5 PLIF, data of 145 who met the study criteria were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 31 patients had L5 sacralization (group A), whereas the remaining 114 patients did not (group B). The primary study endpoint was fusion rate evaluated using dynamic radiographs and computed tomographic scans. Secondary endpoints included (1) pain intensity in the lower back and radiating to the lower extremities on the visual analog scale; (2) clinical outcomes assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index and 12-item Short Form Health Survey; (3) surgical outcomes; and (4) complications.

RESULTS

Fusion rate evaluated using dynamic radiographs and computed tomographic scans at 6 months after surgery did not differ significantly between patients with and without sacralization (P=0.70 and 0.81, respectively), whereas fusion rate at 1 year after surgery did (P=0.04 and 0.04, respectively). In particular, patients with type II or III L5 sacralization had significantly lower fusion rates than those with other types of or no L5 sacralization. Pain intensity, clinical and surgical outcomes, and complications did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with type II or III L5 sacralization may have worse fusion rates after L4-L5 PLIF surgery than those with type I or no sacralization.

Bone Turnover Markers as a New Predicting Factor for Nonunion After Spinal Fusion Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether bone turnover markers could be a useful indicator for prediction of nonunion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Nonunion is a major complication of lumbar spinal fusion surgery. The involvement of bone turnover in the process of bony union in spinal fusion surgery is, however, poorly understood.

METHODS

Of the 74 patients analyzed, 13 were diagnosed with nonunion. We evaluated the significance of the following risk factors: age, sex, number of fused segments, serum levels of total alkaline phosphatase, procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b), and albumin, and history of diabetes mellitus, cigarette smoking, or alcohol use. We also defined the bone turnover ratio (BTR) as a value that equals serum TRACP-5b concentration divided by serum P1NP concentration to evaluate patients' individual bone turnover balance and investigated the significance of BTR as a risk factor.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that older age, malnutrition, and lower P1NP are risk factors for nonunion. Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that in the presence of lower P1NP, higher TRACP-5b becomes a risk factor. Furthermore, we identified BTR as the most significant risk factor for nonunion. The optimum cut-off value of BTR by receiver-operating characteristic curve was 11.74.

CONCLUSION

These findings show a relation between bone turnover and nonunion after spinal fusion surgery. The measurement of bone turnover markers could potentially be used to predict nonunion after spinal fusion surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Factors associated with patient satisfaction for PLIF: Patient satisfaction analysis

Introduction: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has produced satisfactory clinical outcomes; however, all previous reports have only included evaluations by surgeon-based methods. The purpose of this study was to investigate patient-based surgical outcomes and the factors associated with patient satisfaction for PLIF. Methods: Patients who underwent PLIF for lumbar spondylolisthesis were reviewed (n=443). The average follow-up period was 8 years. Surgical outcomes were assessed using an original questionnaire, a numerical rating scale (NRS), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and the recovery rate. The original questionnaire consisted of five categories, with patient-evaluated score out of 100 points for surgery, satisfaction, improvement, recommendation to others, and willingness to undergo repeat surgery on a 5-point scale. According to the questionnaire responses, patient-based outcomes were divided into three groups: positive, intermediate, and negative and were compared with the NRS, SF-36, and JOA scores. Furthermore, factors associated with patient satisfaction were examined. Results: A total of 273 patients responded. Response rate was 62%. The average patient-evaluated score for surgery was 82 points. In terms of satisfaction section, positive, intermediate, and negative response rates were 82%, 7%, and 11%, respectively. With respect to other sections, positive, intermediate, and negative response rates were 87%, 7%, and 6% in improvement section; 66%, 23%, and 11% in recommending section; and 72%, 18%, and 10% in repeat section, respectively. The average pre- and postoperative JOA scores were 12 and 24, respectively. Significant correlations were detected between patient-based surgical outcomes and the NRS scores, physical component scores of the SF-36, and the JOA score. Postoperative permanent motor loss and multiple revision surgery were the major factors related to a negative response. Conclusions: High satisfaction rate to PLIF and significant correlation between patient- and surgeon-based surgical outcomes were detected. Postoperative permanent motor loss and multiple revision surgery were the major factors related to a negative response.

Risk Factors for Poor Patient-Reported Quality of Life Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis of 2-Year Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to identify risk factors for poor patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes, based on five categories (pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, social life dysfunction, and psychological disorders) of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) at the 2-year follow-up.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many studies have been reported on patient QOL outcomes after lumbar surgery; however, few reports have focused on risk factors for poor postoperative QOL outcomes in terms of the various disabilities and dysfunctions after PLIF.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients (39 men and 61 women; mean age 69.6 [44-84] yr) who underwent single- or two-level PLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis and/or foraminal stenosis with a 2-year follow-up were included. The effectiveness of surgery in each category of the JOABPEQ was evaluated. Demographic and clinical data and radiographic parameters were reviewed. Risk factors for poor postoperative QOL outcomes in each category of the JOABPEQ were investigated by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Older age and spinopelvic malalignment (preoperative high pelvic tilt or postoperative decrease in lumbar lordosis [=postoperative increase in the mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis]) were risk factors for poor postoperative QOL outcomes in all categories of the JOABPEQ, except for lumbar spine dysfunction. In contrast, increase in number of PLIF segments, non-union, and radiographic adjacent segment degeneration were risk factors for poor postoperative QOL outcomes in lumbar spine dysfunction and gait disturbance.

CONCLUSION

The risk factors for poor QOL outcomes after PLIF differed among the five categories of the JOABPEQ. In particular, surgery-related factors (e.g., increase in number of PLIF segments, nonunion, and radiographic adjacent segment degeneration) had a negative effect on the improvement of lumbar spine dysfunction and gait disturbance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Cross-Sectional Area of the Lumbar Spine Trunk Muscle and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rate: A Retrospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between trunk muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA) and fusion rate after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using pedicle screw fixation (PLIF-PSF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although trunk muscles of the lumbar spine contribute to spinal stability and alignment, effect of trunk muscles on spinal fusion rate and time to fusion is unclear.

METHODS

A total of 192 adult patients with degenerative lumbar disease who underwent PLIF-PSF at L3-L4 or L4-L5 were included. The MCSA of the flexor (psoas major, PS), extensor (erector spinae, ES; multifidus, MF) were measured using preoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging at 3 segments. Bone union was evaluated using lumbar dynamic plain radiography. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of bone fusion.

RESULTS

Most PS MCSAs in the fusion group were significantly larger than in the nonfusion group, except for MCSA at the L2-L3 segment (all P<0.05). In cases of ES and MF MCSAs, 4 of 6 segments were significantly large. Multivariate analysis revealed that the PS MCSA at L4-L5 was an independent factor for decreased possibility of nonfusion status in both segments (OR=0.812, P=0.028). Pearson analysis demonstrated that the most trunk MCSAs were negatively correlated with time to fusion for both segments and PS MCSAs exhibited a significant correlation with time to fusion except for MCSA at the L2-L3 segment.

CONCLUSIONS

Trunk MCSAs were significantly larger for a fusion group than a nonfusion group. As trunk MCSAs increased, fusion timing decreased.

Correlations and time-dependent changes of upper arm performance tests, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and a newly developed patient-based outcome measure : the Japanese Orthopaedic Cervical Myelopathy Questionnaire

AIMS

In this prospective observational study, we investigated the time-dependent changes and correlations of upper arm performance tests (ten-second test and Simple Test for Evaluating Hand Function (STEF), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) in 31 patients with cervical myelopathy who had undergone surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We hypothesised that all the indices correlate with each other, but show slightly different recovery patterns, and that the newly described JOACMEQ is a sensitive outcome measure.

RESULTS

Peak recoveries were achieved one month post-operatively in the ten-second test and JOACMEQ upper extremity function (UEF) subscale, and at three months in the JOA and STEF scores. The recoveries of all indices were maintained until six months post-operatively. The upper extremity function (UEF) subscale in the JOACMEQ showed the strongest correlation with STEF although all the indices correlated with each other. Patients with ≥ 20 and < 20 acquired points in the UEF subscale were classified into the UEF-improved and UEF-unimproved groups. Comparisons between the groups showed that pre-operative evaluation of "coordinated motion" of the STEF was significantly low in the UEF-unimproved group.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the JOACMEQ is a concise, sensitive, patient-based outcome measure for evaluating functional recovery in patients with cervical myelopathy who have undergone surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:990-6.

A Comparative Radiographic Analysis of Fusion Rate between L4-5 and L5-S1 in a Single Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Objective

This study aimed to investigate radiographic fusion rates at L4-5 and L5-S1 after single level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and evaluate the relationship between fusion rates and preoperative disc slope angle (DSA), lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental angle (SA), and pelvic parameters.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent single level PLIF at L4-5 or L5-S1 during May 2003-December 2012 at our institution. 73 patients were finally enrolled. Fusion was assessed by use of the Brantigan-Steffee classification, less than 2mm translation and less than 5° motion on the flexion-extension lateral radiographs. We analyzed the radiographic fusion rates, risk factors, and relationship of fusion rates with DSA, LL, SA, and pelvic parameters.

Results

There were 59 patients (80.8%) in the L4-5 group and 14 (19.2%) in L5-S1 (average follow-up, 34 months). The radiographic fusion rates were 89.8% in the L4-5 group (53/59) and 42.9% in L5-S1 (6/14) (p<0.001).The preoperative DSA was significantly lesser in the L4-5 group than in the L5-S1 group (13.1±8.1° vs. 27.2±6.7°, p<0.001). The LL, SA, and pelvic parameters were not related with radiographic fusion rates in both groups. Risk factors for non-union were not identified between the two groups except for the surgery level (p<0.001).

Conclusion

The radiographic fusion rate at L5-S1 was less than half that at L4-5 after single level PLIF. This may be due to the anatomical and biomechanical differences between the two levels. More vigorous effort to achieve successful fusion at L5-S1 should be considered.