Ridge preservation using a new 3D collagen matrix: a preclinical study

Effectiveness of a collagen matrix seal and xenograft in alveolar ridge preservation: an experimental study in dogs

Majority of previous studies on alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) used collagen membranes as barrier membranes, and further evidence for ARP in dehiscent extraction sockets with a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) and matrix is needed. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of non-cross linked collagen membranes (membrane) and crosslinked collagen matrices (matrix) on ARP using DBBM in extraction sockets with buccal dehiscence. In six mongrel dogs, the mesial roots of three mandibular premolars (P2, P3, and P4) were extracted 1 month after dehiscence defect induction. Two experimental groups were randomly assigned: (1) DBBM with a membrane (DBBM/membrane group) and (2) DBBM with a matrix (DBBM/matrix group). Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric, microcomputed tomography (μCT), and histologic analyses were performed to assess the ridge preservation. Both groups were effective to maintain the ridge width (p > 0.05), and the DBBM/matrix group showed more favorable soft tissue regeneration and bone quality in the histological analysis (p = 0.05). Based on these results, DBBM/matrix could be better choice for ARP in cases of buccal dehiscence defects.

Alveolar ridge preservation with fibroblast growth factor-2 modified acellular dermal matrix membrane and a bovine-derived xenograft: An experimental in vivo study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of a bone substitute material combined with fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) loaded barrier membrane on the preservation of alveolar ridge after tooth extraction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Four dogs were included. Six extraction sockets of each animal received the 3 treatments and were randomly divided into three groups. Group A: negative control; Group B: bovine xenografts + membrane; and Group C: bovine xenografts + FGF-2-loaded membrane. CBCT and histological analysis were performed to evaluate changes in the width and height of alveolar ridges and extraction socket bone healing 8 weeks post-extraction.

RESULTS

CBCT showed that the alveolar bone in Group A was significantly thinner than that in Group B and Group C at 1 and 3 mm apically from the alveolar crest. The alveolar width at 1 mm in Group C (60.99 ± 15.36%) was significantly thicker than that in Group B (39.75 ± 30.18%). Histomorphmetrical measurements showed that the buccal alveolar width at 1 mm was significantly thicker in Groups B and C than in Group A. Additionally, buccal bone height and lingual bone width at 1 mm in Group C (87.06 ± 10.34%, 89.09 ± 10.56%) were significantly greater than in Group A (53.48 ± 23.94%, 82.72 ± 12.59%).

CONCLUSION

The present findings indicate that application of bovine bone combined with barrier membrane with or without FGF-2 over tooth sockets can effectively reduce ridge absorption, especially in terms of ridge width and FGF-2 modified membrane seems to improve the outcomes obtained with membrane alone.

Ridge Alterations following Socket Preservation Using a Collagen Membrane in Dogs

Background

The healing process following tooth extraction results in alveolar ridge resorption. The dimensional changes may complicate the subsequent implant procedure. Socket preservation using absorbable collagen membranes or a combination of membranes with calcium phosphate cement (CPC) particles might ensure that the alveolar ridge retains a suitable morphology for implant placement.

Objective

To evaluate the quality and quantity of new bone regenerated after application of either collagen membranes alone covering the sockets or a combination of membranes with CPC particles added into the sockets in dogs. Materials and Methods. Six dogs were included in this study. The mandibular premolars were extracted. For each hemimandible, three premolar extraction sites were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: a covering collagen membrane, CPC with a covering collagen membrane, and a socket left empty. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements, polyfluorochrome sequential labeling, and histological assessments were performed to investigate the healing ability and repair processes within a 6-month observation period.

Results

Buccal bone height in the membrane group was significantly higher than that in the membrane+CPC and blank groups at 4 and 6 months after extraction. The mineral apposition rate over 2-4 months and the alizarin red-stained area in the membrane group were significantly higher than those in the other two groups. Histological analysis after 6 months of healing showed significantly higher amounts of newly formed bone in the membrane group than in the other groups.

Conclusion

Extraction sites treated with collagen barrier membranes showed better protection than sites not covered with membranes. And the buccal bone wall of the socket was well preserved by collagen membrane without extra CPC materials. Socket preservation using absorbable membranes alone yielded better quality and quantity of regenerated bone inside the socket site.

Comparison of Bio-degradation for Ridge Preservation Using Silk Fibroin-based Grafts and a Collagen Plug

A material for ridge preservation should have dimensional stability to resist bio-degradation. This study was designed to compare bio-degradation of ridge preservation materials. Collagen plug was used as a positive control. Untreated, ethanol-treated, and 4-hexylresorcinol (4HR)-treated silk plugs were used for the experimental group. Each material underwent a scanning electron microscopic exam and a Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopic exam. Bio-degradation was evaluated by analyzing cylindrical bony defects in rabbit tibias. There were no prominent differences in microstructure among the silk plug groups. FT-IR exam demonstrated that the ethanol- and 4HR-treated silk plug groups had enhanced β-sheet structure. All silk plug groups exhibited significantly higher residual graft than the collagen plug group 4 weeks postoperative (p < 0.05). In conclusion, silk fibroin-based ridge preservation material was less bio-degradable than a collagen plug until at least 4 weeks after grafting.

Effect of ridge preservation for early implant placement - is there a need to remove the biomaterial?

AIM

To assess (i) bone regeneration around implants placed early in sites with or without ridge preservation and (ii) if the bone substitute material (DBBM-C) has to be removed at implant placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In eight beagle dogs, three sites were randomly assigned to ridge preservation (DBBM-C plus collagen matrix (CMX)) (two sites; RP) or spontaneous healing (1 site; SH). Four weeks later, in one of the RP sites, dental implants were placed without removing the DBBM-C (RP1), whereas in RP2 and SH sites all non-integrated DBBM-C and/or granulation tissue were removed before implant placement and concomitant GBR. Histomorphometric outcomes were assessed at 4 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The median buccal fBIC (first bone-to-implant contact) was located more apical in groups RP1: 1.34 mm (0.09; 2.96) and RP2: 1.41 mm (0.54; 2.72) than in group SH: 0.79 mm (0.26; 1.50) (p = 0.452) at 4 weeks. At 12 weeks, median buccal fBIC values were for RP1: 0.88 mm (0.00; 2.33), for RP2: 0.16 mm (0.00; 1.33) and for SH: 0.00 mm (0.00; 0.98) (p = 0.362). BIC values increased over 12 weeks in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ridge preservation followed by early implant placement led to higher BIC values at 12 than at 4 weeks. There is no need to remove the biomaterial at implant placement to ensure osseointegration. No relevant differences were observed between the three groups for any outcome measure.

Advances in collagen, chitosan and silica biomaterials for oral tissue regeneration: from basics to clinical trials

Different materials have distinct surface and bulk characteristics; each of them potentially useful for the treatment of a particular wound or disease.