Four-year outcomes of restored posterior tooth surfaces-a massive data analysis

Longevity of composite restorations in posterior teeth placed by dental students: a 12-year retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the longevity of resin composite restorations placed in posterior teeth by dental students, using data from electronic records from 2008 to 2019.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographic (gender and age) and clinical variables (dental group, position in dental arch, and the number of restored surfaces) were evaluated. The 5-year follow-up was assessed according to the day the restoration was placed. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to calculate the annual failure rate. Data were analyzed by Chi-Square, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

In total, 3.883 records relative to return periodicity were analyzed. The final sample consisted of 900 restorations from 479 patients. The majority were females, aged between 31 and 60. In total, 256 failures were reported (success rate = 78%), showing an annual failure rate of 2.05%. The main reasons for failures were restoration replacement (55.5%), endodontics (21.9%), prosthetics (14.5%) and extraction (8.2%). There was a higher risk of failure in restorations involving three or more surfaces (p = 0.000) and in patients over 60 years (p < 0.001). In females (p = 0.030), molars (p = 0.044), and maxillary teeth (p = 0.038) failed in a shorter time.

CONCLUSIONS

Resin composite restorations placed in permanent posterior teeth by dental students had high survival rates. The main reason for failure was the replacement of restorations. The age group and the number of restored surfaces significantly affected the success of the restorations.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The electronic health records over 12 years showed that 78% of the resin restorations in posterior teeth placed by dental students were successful for a minimum of five years.

Survival analysis of posterior composite restorations in National Dental PBRN general dentistry practices

OBJECTIVE

Quantify the survival of posterior composite restorations (PCR) placed during the study period in permanent teeth in United States (US) general dental community practices and factors predictive of that survival.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted utilizing de-identified electronic dental record (EDR) data of patients who received a PCR in 99 general dentistry practices in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (Network). The final analyzed data set included 700,885 PCRs from 200,988 patients. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan Meier (product limit) estimator were performed to estimate the survival rate (defined as the PCR not receiving any subsequent treatment) after the first PCR was observed in the EDR during the study time. The Cox proportional hazards model was done to account for patient- and tooth-specific covariates.

RESULTS

The overall median survival time was 13.3 years. The annual failure rates were 4.5-5.8 % for years 1-5; 5.3-5.7 %, 4.9-5.5 %, and 3.3-5.2 % for years 6-10, 11-15, and 16-20, respectively. The failure descriptions recorded for < 7 % failures were mostly caries (54 %) and broken or fractured tooth/restorations (23 %). The following variables significantly predicted PCR survival: number of surfaces that comprised the PCR; having at least one interproximal surface; tooth type; type of prior treatment received on the tooth; Network region; patient age and sex. Based on the magnitude of the multivariable estimates, no single factor predominated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of Network practices geographically distributed across the US observed PCR survival rates and predictive factors comparable to studies done in academic settings and outside the US.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Specific baseline factors significantly predict the survival of PCRs done in US community dental practices.

Needs for re-intervention on restored teeth in adults: a practice-based study

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the need for re-intervention on dental coronal restorations in adults seen in a network of general dental practitioners (ReCOL).  MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved 40 practitioners and 400 patients. Coronal restoration failures (needing re-intervention for unsatisfactory outcomes) were assessed with a simplified rating scale of seven criteria from the FDI World Dental Federation. The oral health status, the risk factors, and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 were also examined. Previous restoration characteristics (extent, technique, material) were analyzed according to the need for re-intervention (yes/no), the age group, and the risk profile. Qualitative variables were compared between "re-intervention" and "no re-intervention" group using Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

The need for re-intervention was estimated at 74% (95% CI: 70; 79); it increased with age (49 to 90%), unfavorable risk profile (82 vs. 62%), and extent of the filling (32, 39, 44, and 44% on 1, 2, 3 surfaces, and crowns, respectively). More posterior than anterior teeth were restored (median per patient: 6 vs. 1) or needed re-intervention (median per patient: 1 vs. 0).

CONCLUSIONS

The needs for re-intervention in adults are still high within a context of ever-changing materials and techniques, simplified and rationalized decision-makings, and demands for patient involvement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Meeting these needs requires the following: (i) consensus definitions and assessment methods for "failure" and (ii) reliable feedbacks on materials, procedures, and satisfaction. Building large and detailed databases fed by networks of motivated practitioners will help analyzing complex success/failure data by artificial intelligence and guiding treatment and research.

Performance of fixed dental prostheses up to 6 years-A massive data analysis

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Metal and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) have been clinically determined to provide long-term durable restorations. However, data on their performance under practice conditions are sparse.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the longevity of FDPs under practice conditions by analyzing a large insurance claims database.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were extracted from the data warehouse of a major German national health insurance company (BARMER). The analysis focused on the FDP types with the lowest deductibles in the insurance system. All metal-based FDPs replacing up to 3 adjacent teeth were included. Ceramic veneering was optional and only approved on the labial surfaces of maxillary teeth mesial to the first molar and mandibular teeth mesial to the second premolar. Fee codes allowed clinical courses to be traced on a day count basis. Three groups with FDPs replacing 1 tooth, 2 teeth, and 3 teeth were formed. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted for the target events removal or extraction, indicating FDP failure and extraction of an abutment tooth.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 124 660 FDPs that replaced 1 tooth (76.5%), 2 teeth (19.8%), or 3 teeth (3.7%). The cumulative survival rates for removal or extraction at 6 years differed significantly, with 83.0% for 1-pontic FDPs, 78.1% for 2-pontic FDPs, and 74.0% for 3-pontic FDPs. Thus, approximately 1 of 6 one-pontic FDPs, 1 of 5 two-pontic FDPs, and 1 of 4 three-pontic FDPs failed. The cumulative survival rates for extraction of an abutment tooth at 6 years showed no significant difference, with 96.0% for 1-pontic FDPs, 95.6% for 2-pontic FDPs, and 95.1% for 3-pontic FDPs.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival rates of FDPs according to insurance data were lower than those reported by clinical studies, indicating a gap between efficacy and effectiveness.

Practice-based analysis of direct posterior dental restorations performed in a public health service: Retrospective long-term survival in Brazil

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the survival and associated factors for the longevity of direct posterior restorations and to verify whether the geographic location of public health units could influence the long-term survival of such restorations. Data were extracted from electronic patient files of the Brazilian public oral health services. The sample comprised 2,405 class I and II restorations performed 4 to 24 years ago (mean, 8.9 years) in 351 patients (6.8 teeth/patient) across 12 public health units located in different city regions (42 professionals—55 restorations). The restoration was considered successful if it had not been repaired or replaced at the time of evaluation; failure was defined as replacement of the restoration, the need for endodontic treatment, tooth/restoration fracture or tooth extraction. Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier test for restoration survival and Cox regression to evaluate the factors associated with failure. The majority of the restorations involved the use of amalgam (85%), involved a single face (70%), and were without pulp/dentin capping (85%). The overall survival rate was 95%, and the mean observation time was 8.9 years. The restoration survival was 79% (95% CI: 60.6–89.5) over 24 years, and the mean survival time was 22.2 years (95% CI: 21.9–22.6 years). The annual failure rate up to 24 years was 0.9%. After the adjustment, only the number of restored faces and the geographic location where the restoration was performed remained associated with failure of the restoration. The direct posterior restorations performed at the evaluated public health service units presented high survival rates. The restorations of people with lower access to POHS had lower survival rates. Class I restorations presented higher survival rates than class II restorations with two or more faces, regardless of the restorative material used.

When to intervene in the caries process? A Delphi consensus statement

Objectives To define an expert Delphi consensus on when to intervene in the caries process and existing carious lesions.Methods Non-systematic literature synthesis, expert Delphi consensus process and expert panel conference.Results Lesion activity, cavitation and cleansability determine intervention thresholds. Inactive lesions do not require treatment (in some cases, restorations may be placed for form, function, aesthetics); active lesions do. Non-cavitated carious lesions should be managed non- or micro-invasively, as should most cavitated lesions which are cleansable. Cavitated lesions which are not cleansable usually require minimally invasive management. In specific circumstances, mixed interventions may be applicable. Occlusally, cavitated lesions confined to enamel/non-cavitated lesions extending radiographically into deep dentine may be exceptions. Proximally, cavitation is hard to assess tactile-visually. Most lesions extending radiographically into the middle/inner third of dentine are assumed to be cavitated. Those restricted to the enamel are not cavitated. For lesions extending radiographically into the outer third of dentine, cavitation is unlikely. These lesions should be managed as if they were non-cavitated unless otherwise indicated. Individual decisions should consider factors modifying these thresholds.Conclusions Comprehensive diagnosis is the basis for systematic decision-making on when to intervene in the caries process and existing lesions.

Six-year survival of single crowns - A massive data analysis

OBJECTIVES

Numerous clinical trials have proven the long-term stability of metal and metal-ceramic crowns. However, data on their performance under practice conditions are rare.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the longevity of crowns by means of massive data analyses.

METHODS

The data were extracted from the data warehouse of a major German national health insurance company (BARMER, Berlin, Germany). The analysis focused on crown types with the lowest deductibles. Metal crowns and metal-ceramic crowns with ceramic veneering on the vestibular aspects of teeth 15-25 and 34-44 placed from 2012 to 2017 were included. The placement of the crowns, crown removals and tooth extractions were identified using the corresponding fee codes. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted for the outcomes "crown removal or extraction" and for "extraction".

RESULTS

The cumulative six-year survival rates were 88.0 % for the outcome "crown removal or extraction" and 92.5 % for the outcome "extraction" (N = 192,868). The survival functions had slightly steepening but close to linear courses.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of the treatment with metal and metal-ceramic crowns was moderately inferior in comparison to clinical trials. However, treatment with metal and metal-crowns is judged to be a reliable and safe option under practice conditions.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Clinicians must inform patients about potential treatment outcomes. Therefore, additional knowledge about single crown outcomes under general practice settings based on large database analyses is important.

Massive data analyses show negative impact of type 1 and 2 diabetes on the outcome of periodontal treatment

Objectives

The aim was to evaluate the impact of diabetes on the outcome of periodontal treatment based on massive data analyses.

Materials and methods

Data originated from the database of a major German National Health Insurance. Patients who underwent periodontal treatment were allocated to four groups according to their medical condition: type 1 diabetes (D1), type 2 diabetes with the intake of oral anti-diabetics (D2M), type 2 diabetes without the intake of oral anti-diabetics (D2), and a control group without diabetes (ND). Four-year Kaplan-Meier survival analyses on the patient level and multivariate regression analyses were conducted for tooth extraction.

Results

Of 415,718 patients, 4139 matched the criteria for D1, 22,430 for D2M, and 23,576 for D2. At 4 years, the cumulative survival rate (no extraction) was 51.7% in the D1 group, 54.0% in the D2M group, and 57.7% in the D2 group. The ND control group had a significantly higher survival rate of 65.9% (P < 0.0001). In the multivariate analyses, both diabetes types were significantly associated with further tooth loss after periodontal treatment.

Conclusions

The diagnosis of diabetes type 1 or 2 seems to be associated with a higher risk of tooth loss after periodontal treatment.

Clinical relevance

The long-term prognosis of teeth in diabetes patients should be judged carefully.

Type and time of first re-intervention of posterior restorations - 13-year scenario at the public dental service

Objectives: We investigated the first re-interventions of two- and three-surface direct restorations on posterior teeth, specifically noting the type and time of the first re-intervention.Materials and methods: In 2002, altogether 5542 posterior two- and three-surface composite and amalgam restorations were done for 3051 patients aged 25-30 years at Helsinki City Public Dental Service (PDS). Based on electronic patient records, we analysed all restorations (n = 2445) having re-intervention during a 13-year follow-up. We recorded the type of tooth, restoration size, and type of first re-intervention. The time to re-intervention was the interval between the date of the placement of restoration at the year 2002 and its first re-intervention.Results: Restorative treatment was the most common (77.9%) first re-intervention, followed by endodontics (11.5%), extractions (5.2%), and other (5.4%). Males, more frequently than females, had extraction or endodontics as first re-intervention. The average time to re-intervention was 5.7 years (SD 3.8; median 5.2). Both median and mean times were shortest for cases involving endodontics or extractions.Conclusions: For the majority of two- and three-surface posterior restorations, the first re-intervention is restorative (replacement or repair of restoration). The shortest time to re-intervention is for restorations that have endodontics or extraction as the first re-intervention.

Material selection for tooth-supported single crowns-a survey among dentists in Germany

Objectives

This study aimed to survey dentists in Germany to identify their favored materials for the fabrication of tooth-supported single crowns (SCs) depending on the location of the abutment teeth and the preparation margin.

Materials and methods

The survey included questions regarding demographic characteristics of dentists/their dental practice and preferred restorative materials for the fabrication of SCs for abutment teeth 16, 11, 34, and 36 with either supra- or subgingival preparation margins.

Results

Between August 2019 and February 2020, 721 dentists participated in the survey; responses from 33 dentists were excluded from data analysis because the dentists did not work in Germany or provided less than one fixed dental prosthesis/month. Dentists favored ceramic materials independent of the location of the abutment tooth and preparation margin (56.6–92.2%). CAD/CAM resin composites or full metals were preferred by only a few participants. A significantly higher proportion of dentists recommended porcelain fused to metal for subgingival preparation margins than for supragingival margins (p < 0.001). Characteristics of dentists/dental practices influenced a single scenario (11 subgingival) that was dependent on the dentist’s time since graduation. When asked to specify the ceramic materials, numerous participants wrote a free response (5.7–7.8%) or did not answer (0.7–4.8%).

Conclusions

Dentists in Germany selected restorative materials for SCs depending on the clinical scenario. Since numerous dentists did not specify the ceramic materials, postgraduate information and education might help to extend expertise.

Clinical relevance

The results of this survey provide insight into the favored materials of dentists for the fabrication of tooth-supported SCs.

Maintaining pulpal vitality: Cost-effectiveness analysis on carious tissue removal and direct pulp capping

OBJECTIVES

When managing deep carious lesions, dentists can maintain pulp vitality via (1) avoiding pulp exposure and complications by performing selective (SE) instead of non-selective (NS) carious tissue removal, and/or (2) treat exposed pulps by direct capping with mineral-trioxide-aggregate (MTA) instead of calcium hydroxide (CH). We assessed the cost-effectiveness of SE vs. NS combined with direct pulp capping using MTA vs. CH.

METHODS

A mixed public-private-payer perspective within German healthcare was applied. We modeled a permanent molar with a deep carious lesion and a vital asymptomatic pulp. The lesion was treated by SE/NS and, in case of exposure, direct pulp capping using MTA/CH. The tooth was followed over the lifetime of an initially 30-year-old patient using Markov-models, informed by pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses and further data sources. The primary health outcome was tooth-retention time. Costs were derived from German fee item catalogues, combined with micro-costing. Monte-Carlo micro-simulation was performed, and uncertainty introduced via probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses. Value-of-information-analysis (VOI) was performed to quantify the value of further research.

RESULTS

SE and, in case of pulp exposure, MTA had a high chance (>95 %) of being cost-effective, with teeth being retained for 37.37 years at costs of 2140 Euro in mean. Alternative strategies were both more costly and less effective; this ranking was robust in sensitivity analyses. The VOI was 1.18 Euro per treated case and 12.86 million Euro on population-level.

CONCLUSION

Selective carious tissue removal and, in case of pulp exposure, direct capping with MTA was the most cost-effective strategy.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Avoiding pulp exposure was more relevant for cost-effectiveness than how the exposed pulp was managed. Overall differences remain limited, though, and dentists may want to tailor treatment strategies according to their expertise and patients' expectations.

Using big data to promote precision oral health in the context of a learning healthcare system

There has been a call for evidence-based oral healthcare guidelines, to improve precision dentistry and oral healthcare delivery. The main challenges to this goal are the current lack of up-to-date evidence, the limited integrative analytical data sets, and the slow translations to routine care delivery. Overcoming these issues requires knowledge discovery pipelines based on big data and health analytics, intelligent integrative informatics approaches, and learning health systems. This article examines how this can be accomplished by utilizing big data. These data can be gathered from four major streams: patients, clinical data, biological data, and normative data sets. All these must then be uniformly combined for analysis and modelling and the meaningful findings can be implemented clinically. By executing data capture cycles and integrating the subsequent findings, practitioners are able to improve public oral health and care delivery.

Can We Predict Usage of Dental Services? An Analysis from Germany 2000 to 2015

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to predict the usage of dental services in Germany from 2000 to 2015 based on epidemiologic and demographic data, and to compare these predictions against claims within the statutory health insurance.

METHODS

Indicators for operative (number of coronally decayed or filled teeth, root surface caries lesions, and fillings), prosthetic (number of missing teeth), and periodontal treatment needs (number of teeth with probing pocket depths (PPDs) ≥ 4 mm) from nationally representative German Oral Health Studies (1997, 2005, 2014) were cross-sectionally interpolated across age and time, and combined with year- and age-specific population estimates. These, as well as the number of children eligible for individual preventive services (aged 6 to 17 y), were adjusted for age- and time-specific insurance status and services' utilization to yield predicted usage of operative, prosthetic, periodontal, and preventive services. Cumulative annual usage in these 4 services groups were compared against aggregations of a total of 24 claims positions from the statutory German health insurance.

RESULTS

Morbidity, utilization, and demography were highly dynamic across age groups and over time. Despite improvements of individual oral health, predicted usage of dental services did not decrease over time, but increased mainly due to usage shifts from younger (shrinking) to older (growing) age groups. Predicted usage of operative services increased between 2000 and 2015 (from 52 million to 56 million, +7.8%); predictions largely agreed with claimed services (root mean square error [RMSE] 1.9 million services, error range -4.6/+3.8%). Prosthetic services increased (from 2.4 million to 2.6 million, +11.9%), with near perfect agreement to claimed data [RMSE 0.1 million services, error range -8.3/+3.9%]). Periodontal services also increased (from 21 million to 27 million, +25.9%; RMSE 5.2 million services, error range +21.9/+36.5%), as did preventive services (from 22 million to 27 million, +20.4%; RMSE 3 million, error range -13.7/-4.7%).

CONCLUSION

Predicting dental services seems viable when accounting for the joint dynamics of morbidity, utilization, and demographics.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT

Based on epidemiologic and demographic data, predicting usage of certain dental services is viable when accounting for the dynamics of morbidity, utilization, and demographics.

When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement

OBJECTIVES

To define an expert Delphi consensus on when to intervene in the caries process and on existing carious lesions using non- or micro-invasive, invasive/restorative or mixed interventions.

METHODS

Non-systematic literature synthesis, expert Delphi consensus process and expert panel conference.

RESULTS

Carious lesion activity, cavitation and cleansability determine intervention thresholds. Inactive lesions do not require treatment (in some cases, restorations will be placed for reasons of form, function and aesthetics); active lesions do. Non-cavitated carious lesions should be managed non- or micro-invasively, as should most cavitated carious lesions which are cleansable. Cavitated lesions which are not cleansable usually require invasive/restorative management, to restore form, function and aesthetics. In specific circumstances, mixed interventions may be applicable. On occlusal surfaces, cavitated lesions confined to enamel and non-cavitated lesions radiographically extending deep into dentine (middle or inner dentine third, D2/3) may be exceptions to that rule. On proximal surfaces, cavitation is hard to assess visually or by using tactile methods. Hence, radiographic lesion depth is used to determine the likelihood of cavitation. Most lesions radiographically extending into the middle or inner third of the dentine (D2/3) can be assumed to be cavitated, while those restricted to the enamel (E1/2) are not cavitated. For lesions radiographically extending into the outer third of the dentine (D1), cavitation is unlikely, and these lesions should be managed as if they were non-cavitated unless otherwise indicated. Individual decisions should consider factors modifying these thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive diagnostics are the basis for systematic decision-making on when to intervene in the caries process and on existing carious lesions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Carious lesion activity, cavitation and cleansability determine intervention thresholds. Invasive treatments should be applied restrictively and with these factors in mind.

The differences between three performance measures on dental restorations, clinical success, survival and failure: A matter of perspective

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective methodology study was to investigate the influence of using different definitions for restoration failure and inclusion criteria on restoration longevity expressed in AFR.

METHODS

EPF from fifteen general dental practices were used for collecting the data for this study. From the EPF, 321,749 composite restorations placed in 52,245 patients by forty-seven GDPs between January 2000 and December 2011 were included. Kaplan-Meier statistics were applied and mean AFRs over 2, 5 and 10 years were calculated. The effect on the AFR of using different levels of failure: based on Claims data (CD), Success (SUC), Survival (SUR) and different inclusion criteria of tooth/restoration variables were reported.

RESULTS

Highest AFRs were found for level CD, in which every intervention was considered as failure, and the lowest AFRs for level SUR in which repairs and an endodontic treatments were not considered as a failure. AFRs increased when the observation period prolonged especially for SUR, followed by SUC and CD. An overview of long-term survival studies showed a wide variation in study design, performed clinical examination (USPHS criteria or GDP), number of restorations included, description of restoration failure and found AFRs for CD, SUC and SUR.

SIGNIFICANCE

Using failure criteria, Success and Survival, in future clinical studies would enable a better comparison of studies as well as demonstrate the impact of more conservative restorative intervention protocols on patient care.

Tailored Dentistry: From "One Size Fits All" to Precision Dental Medicine?

Over the past 30 years and fueled by both a rapidly evolving understanding of dental diseases and technological advances in diagnostics and therapy, dentistry has been changing dramatically. Managing dental caries and carious lesions had, for nearly a century, encompassed only a small number of basic concepts that were applied to virtually all patients and lesions, namely, invasive removal of any carious tissue regardless of its activity or depth and its replacement with restorative materials (amalgams or crowns for most of the past) or tooth removal and prosthetic replacement. Grounded in a deeper understanding of the disease "caries," its management-aiming to control the causes of the disease, to slow down or alleviate existing disease, and, only as a last resort, to remove its symptoms using a bur or forceps-has become more complex and diverse. In parallel and at nearly unprecedented speed, our patients are changing, as mirrored by ongoing debates as to the demographic and, with it, the social future of most high-income countries. This article describes how these changes will have a profound future impact on how we practice dental medicine in the future. It will deduce, from both demographic and epidemiologic trends, why there is the need to apply not one but rather the whole range of existing evidence-based concepts in an individualized (personalized) manner, hence increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of dental management strategies, and also describe how these strategies should be tailored according not only to our patients (their age and risk profiles) but also to the specific tooth (or site or lesion).

Risk Factors for Dental Restoration Survival: A Practice-Based Study

To improve patient dental care, it is necessary to identify possible risk factors for the failing of restorations. This practice-based cohort study investigated the performance and influence of possible risk factors at the level of the practice, patient, tooth, and restoration on survival of direct class II restorations. Electronic patient files from 11 Dutch general practices were collected, and 31,472 restorations placed between January 2015 and October 2017 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier statistics were performed; annual failure rates (AFRs) were calculated; and variables were assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis. The observation time of restorations varied from 0 to 2.7 y, resulting in a mean AFR of 7.8% at 2 y. However, wide variation in AFRs existed among the operators, varying between 3.6% and 11.4%. A wide range of patient-related variables is related to a high risk for reintervention: patient age (elderly: hazard ratio [HR], 1.372), general health (medically compromised: HR, 1.478), periodontal status (periodontal problems: HR, 1.207), caries risk and risk for parafunctional habits (high: HR, 1.687), restorations in molar teeth (HR, 1.383), restorations placed in endodontically treated teeth (HR, 1.890), and multisurface restorations (≥4 surfaces: HR, 1.345). Restorations placed due to fracture were more prone to fail than restorations placed due to caries. When patient-related risk factors were excluded, remaining risk factors considerably changed in their effect and significance: the effect of operator, age of the patient, and endodontic treatment increased; the effect of the diagnosis decreased; and the socioeconomic status became significant (high: HR, 0.873). This study demonstrated that a wide variation of risk factors on the practice, patient, and tooth levels influences the survival of class II restorations. To provide personalized dental care, it is important to identify and record potential risk factors. Therefore, we recommend further clinical studies to include these patient risk factors in data collection and analysis.

Tooth loss after periodontal treatment-Mining an insurance database

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate tooth loss after periodontal treatment.

METHODS

The data was collected from the digital database of a major German national health insurance company. Periodontal treatment was the intervention in the treatment group. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses on the patient level with the primary outcome extraction were carried out over four years. A control group without treatment was matched and analysed. Differences were tested with the Log-Rank-test. Extraction incidences were calculated over a matched observation period six years before and four years after treatment for both treatment and control group.

RESULTS

A total of 415,718 periodontal treatments could be traced. Focussing on the outcome "extraction", the cumulative four-year survival rate was 63.8% after periodontal treatment. The matched control group without periodontal treatment showed a survival rate of 72.5%. These differences were significant (p < 0.0001). The extraction incidence over time was higher in a four-year period after periodontal treatment compared to a six-year period before periodontal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of periodontal treatment was acceptable. In about two thirds of the patients, extractions could be completely avoided within a four year period after treatment.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study within the German national health insurance system shows that extractions were not observed after periodontal treatment in the majority of cases. Although periodontitis is a chronic disease, patients suffering from periodontitis have a considerable chance to prevent further tooth loss.

Amalgam Alternatives: Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information Analysis

We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of amalgam alternatives—namely, incrementally placed composites (IComp), composites placed in bulk (BComp), and glass ionomer cements (GIC). In a sensitivity analysis, we also included composite inlays (CompI) and incrementally placed bulk-fills (IBComp). Moreover, the value of information (VOI) regarding the effectiveness of all strategies was determined. A mixed public-private-payer perspective in the context of Germany was adopted. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to yield effectiveness estimates (relative risk [RR] of failure). A 3-surfaced restoration on a permanent molar in initially 30-y-old patients was followed over patients’ lifetime using a Markov model. Restorative and endodontic complications were modeled; our outcome parameter was the years of tooth retention. Costs were derived from insurance fee items. Monte Carlo microsimulations were used to estimate cost-effectiveness, cost-effectiveness acceptability, and VOI. Initially, BComp/GIC were less costly (110.11 euros) than IComp (146.82 euros) but also more prone to failures (RRs [95% credible intervals (CrI)] were 1.6 [0.8 to 3.4] for BComp and 1.3 [0.5 to 5.6] for GIC). When following patients over their lifetime, IComp was most effective (mean [SD], 41.9 [1] years) and least costly (2,076 [135] euros), hence dominating both BComp (40.5 [1] years; 2,284 [126] euros) and GIC (41.2 years; 2,177 [126] euros) in 90% of simulations. Eliminating the uncertainty around the effectiveness of the strategies was worth 3.99 euros per restoration, translating into annual economic savings of 87.8 million euros for payers. Including CompI and IBComp into our analyses had only a minimal impact, and our findings were robust in further sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, the initial savings by BComp/GIC compared with IComp are very likely to be compensated by the higher risk of failures and costs for retreatments. CompI and IBComp do not seem cost-effective. All alternatives are likely to be inferior to amalgam. The VOI was considerable, and future studies may yield significant economic benefits.