Comparative evaluation of autofluorescence imaging and histopathological investigation for oral potentially malignant disorders in Taiwan

Effectiveness of adjunctive screening tools for potentially malignant oral disorders and oral cancer: A systematic review

Background and objectives

To enhance the abilities of healthcare professionals to make informed treatment decisions and establish accurate diagnoses, it is essential to assess the diagnostic reliability of different adjunctive aids. This systematic review aimed to compare the accuracy of various adjunctive methods for diagnosing suspected oral cancer (OC) or potentially malignant oral disorders (OPMD) in adults against histopathological investigative results.

Materials and methods

The review protocol registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023463525) was developed in strict accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-Diagnostic Test Accuracy checklist. A comprehensive electronic search was conducted to identify relevant research articles published between January 2014 and April 2023 using the PubMed and EBSCO databases. The research question was meticulously structured following the participants' index test, reference standard, target condition, and study setting framework. To evaluate methodological quality and assess the risk of bias (RoB), the Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used.

Results

An initial search yielded 483 publications, which were reduced to 278 after removal of duplicates. Finally, 85 publications underwent full-text review by two investigators, which lead to 29 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 7% had a low RoB, 72% had an unclear RoB, and 21% had a high RoB. Applicability concerns were expressed in 59% of the studies with low concern, 31% with unclear quality evidence of concern, and 10% with high concern.

Conclusion

The review findings support the use of these diagnostic methods as valuable adjuncts to biopsy for the early detection of various OPMD and OC. They also highlight the importance of regular screening and awareness in reducing the global burden of OC, while acknowledging that they cannot replace the gold standards of surgical biopsy and histopathological evaluation.

Autofluorescence Image-Guided Endoscopy in the Management of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Tumors

At this juncture, autofluorescence and narrow-band imaging have resurfaced in the medicine arena in parallel with current technology advancement. The emergence of newly developed optical instrumentation in addition to the discovery of new fluorescence biomolecules have contributed to a refined management of diseases and tumors, especially in the management of upper aerodigestive tract tumors. The advancement in multispectral imaging and micro-endoscopy has also escalated the trends further in the setting of the management of this tumor, in order to gain not only the best treatment outcomes but also facilitate early tumor diagnosis. This includes the usage of autofluorescence endoscopy for screening, diagnosis and treatment of this tumor. This is crucial, as microtumoral deposit at the periphery of the gross tumor can be only assessed via an enhanced endoscopy and even more precisely with autofluorescence endoscopic techniques. Overall, with this new technique, optimum management can be achieved for these patients. Hence, the treatment outcomes can be improved and patients are able to attain better prognosis and survival.

Non-invasive imaging of oral potentially malignant and malignant lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Non-invasive (NI) imaging techniques have been developed to overcome the limitations of invasive biopsy procedures, which is the gold standard in diagnosis of oral dysplasia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC). This systematic review and meta- analysis was carried out with an aim to investigate the efficacy of the NI-imaging techniques in the detection of dysplastic oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and OSCC. Records concerned in the detection of OPMDs, Oral Cancer were identified through search in PubMed, Science direct, Cochrane Library electronic database (January 2000 to October 2020) and additional manual searches. Out of 529 articles evaluated for eligibility, 56 satisfied the pre-determined inclusion criteria, including 13 varying NI-imaging techniques. Meta-analysis consisted 44 articles, wherein majority of the studies reported Autofluorescence (AFI-38.6%) followed by Chemiluminescence (CHEM), Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) (CHEM, NBI-15.9%), Fluorescence Spectroscopy (FS), Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy (DRS), (FS, DRS-13.6%) and 5aminolevulinic acid induced protoporphyrin IX fluorescence (5ALA induced PPIX- 6.8%). Higher sensitivities (Sen) and specificities (Spe) were obtained using FS (Sen:74%, Spe:96%, SAUC=0.98), DRS (Sen:79%, Spe:86%, SAUC = 0.91) and 5 ALA induced PPIX (Sen:91%, Spe:78%, SAUC = 0.98) in the detection of dysplastic OPMDs from non-dysplastic lesions(NDLs). AFI, FS, DRS, NBI showed higher sensitivities and SAUC (>90%) in differentiating OSCC from NDLs. Analysed NI-imaging techniques suggests the higher accuracy levels in the diagnosis of OSCC when compared to dysplastic OPMDs. 5 ALA induced PPIX, DRS and FS showed evidence of superior accuracy levels in differentiation of dysplastic OPMDs from NDLs, however results need to be validated in a larger number of studies.

In Vivo Imaging-Based Techniques for Early Diagnosis of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are lesions that may undergo malignant transformation to oral cancer. The early diagnosis and surveillance of OPMDs reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients. Diagnostic techniques based on medical images analysis have been developed to diagnose clinical conditions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of imaging-based techniques compared to the gold standard of histopathology to assess their ability to correctly identify the presence of OPMDs. Design: Literature searches of free text and MeSH terms were performed using MedLine (PubMed), Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library (from 2000 to 30 June 2020). The keywords used in the search strategy were: (“oral screening devices” or “autofluorescence” or “chemiluminescence” or “optical imaging” or “imaging technique”) and (“oral dysplasia” or “oral malignant lesions” or “oral precancerosis”). Results: The search strategy identified 1282 potential articles. After analyzing the results and applying the eligibility criteria, the remaining 43 papers were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 34 of these were included in the meta-analysis. Conclusions: None of the analyzed techniques based on assessing oral images can replace the biopsy. Further studies are needed to explore the role of techniques-based imaging analysis to identify an early noninvasive screening method.

Accuracy of autofluorescence and chemiluminescence in the diagnosis of oral Dysplasia and Carcinoma: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To define the accuracy of autofluorescence-based (AF) and chemiluminescence-based (CL) systems in the diagnosis of oral dysplastic and malignant lesions in addition to the Conventional Oral Examination (COE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was performed according to the PRISMA-DTA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 2631 oral cavity lesions (AF, n = 2076; CL, n = 555) from 26 studies (AF = 17; CL = 9) was used for calculation of diagnostic accuracy parameters. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of the AF were 81.3% (95% CI: 74.3% - 87.5%) and 52.1% (95% CI: 36.9% - 67.1%), respectively. Cumulative diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 5.44 (95% CI: 2.29 - 10.56) with a significant heterogeneity between studies (I² = 80.7%, 95% CI: 70.0% - 86.7%; p < .05). The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity for the CL were 84.9% (95% CI: 66.7% - 96.7%) and 51.8% (95% CI: 37.3% - 65.9%), respectively. The overall pooled DOR was 8.59 (95% CI: 2.11 - 22.38) with a significant heterogeneity between studies (I² = 65.4%, 95% CI: 29.6% - 83.0%; p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

AF and CL present a high sensitivity in the diagnosis of dysplastic and malignant oral cavity lesions, demonstrating that diagnostic biopsies may be avoided in case of a negative test result. Both tests have a low specificity, and the reduction of the false positive rate compared to the COE alone remains poor.

Diagnostic tests for oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients presenting with clinically evident lesions

BACKGROUND

Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common form of malignancy of the oral cavity, and is often proceeded by oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD). Early detection of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (oral cancer) can improve survival rates. The current diagnostic standard of surgical biopsy with histology is painful for patients and involves a delay in order to process the tissue and render a histological diagnosis; other diagnostic tests are available that are less invasive and some are able to provide immediate results. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective: to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of index tests for the detection of oral cancer and OPMD, in people presenting with clinically evident suspicious and innocuous lesions.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE

to estimate the relative accuracy of the different index tests.

SEARCH METHODS

Cochrane Oral Health's Information Specialist searched the following databases: MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 20 October 2020), and Embase Ovid (1980 to 20 October 2020). The US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register (ClinicalTrials.gov) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were also searched for ongoing trials to 20 October 2020. No restrictions were placed on the language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases. We conducted citation searches, and screened reference lists of included studies for additional references.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected studies that reported the diagnostic test accuracy of the following index tests when used as an adjunct to conventional oral examination in detecting OPMD or oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: vital staining (a dye to stain oral mucosa tissues), oral cytology, light-based detection and oral spectroscopy, blood or saliva analysis (which test for the presence of biomarkers in blood or saliva).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance. Eligibility, data extraction and quality assessment were carried out by at least two authors, independently and in duplicate. Studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). Meta-analysis was used to combine the results of studies for each index test using the bivariate approach to estimate the expected values of sensitivity and specificity.

MAIN RESULTS

This update included 63 studies (79 datasets) published between 1980 and 2020 evaluating 7942 lesions for the quantitative meta-analysis. These studies evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of conventional oral examination with: vital staining (22 datasets), oral cytology (24 datasets), light-based detection or oral spectroscopy (24 datasets). Nine datasets assessed two combined index tests. There were no eligible diagnostic accuracy studies evaluating blood or salivary sample analysis. Two studies were classed as being at low risk of bias across all domains, and 33 studies were at low concern for applicability across the three domains, where patient selection, the index test, and the reference standard used were generalisable across the population attending secondary care. The summary estimates obtained from the meta-analysis were: - vital staining: sensitivity 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 0.90) specificity 0.68 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.77), 20 studies, sensitivity low-certainty evidence, specificity very low-certainty evidence; - oral cytology: sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.94) specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.97), 20 studies, sensitivity moderate-certainty evidence, specificity moderate-certainty evidence; - light-based: sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.93) specificity 0.50 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.68), 23 studies, sensitivity low-certainty evidence, specificity very low-certainty evidence; and - combined tests: sensitivity 0.78 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.94) specificity 0.71 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.84), 9 studies, sensitivity very low-certainty evidence, specificity very low-certainty evidence.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At present none of the adjunctive tests can be recommended as a replacement for the currently used standard of a surgical biopsy and histological assessment. Given the relatively high values of the summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity for oral cytology, this would appear to offer the most potential. Combined adjunctive tests involving cytology warrant further investigation. Potentially eligible studies of blood and salivary biomarkers were excluded from the review as they were of a case-control design and therefore ineligible. In the absence of substantial improvement in the tests evaluated in this updated review, further research into biomarkers may be warranted.

Evaluation of oral potentially malignant disorders with autoflorescence, reflectance spectroscopy and vital staining and their correlation with histopathology - Hospital based prospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate diagnostic efficacy of Identafi® and toluidine blue in screening of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty nine patients (63 lesions) with OPMDs visiting Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, B.P.Koirala Institute of Health Science (BPKIHS) were included in the study. After thorough history and oral examination, screening was done by Identafi® followed by toluidine blue staining. Then incisional biopsy under local anesthesia was performed from the site showing positive change followed by histopathological examination.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity and specificity of Identafi®^'s violet light was 73% and 46.2%. The overall sensitivity and specificity of Identafi®^'s green-amber light were 78.4% and 15.4% respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of toluidine blue were 51.4 and 84.6 respectively. A statistically-significant association was observed between the toluidine blue and histopathology results, (p = 0.04), p value set at ≤ 0.05.

CONCLUSION

Identafi®'s violet light and green amber light are more sensitive in detecting true positives. Toluidine blue is highly specific in ruling out true negative cases. The screening of OPMDs will help in selecting proper biopsy site followed by early diagnosis and intervention, hence increasing the prognosis, outcome and decrease complications associated with it.

Clinico-pathological correlation of optical fluorescence imaging in oral mucosal lesions

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify clinical and pathological characteristics of oral mucosal lesions that may be predictive of optical autofluorescence imaging patterns.

METHODS

Clinical data and archival histopathological material were collected from patients who presented with at least one oral mucosal lesion and underwent assessment via conventional oral examination, optical autofluorescence imaging and histopathological analysis. An open-source digital pathology image analysis software was used to perform histomorphometric measurements. Classification and regression trees were used to determine histopathological characteristics most predictive of a clinical autofluorescence outcome.

RESULTS

Histomorphometric features associated with tissue architecture, epithelial changes, inflammation and vasculature were found to be significantly associated with autofluorescence patterns. Diascopic fluorescence was found to be significantly predicted by lichenoid inflammation and was significantly associated with a diagnosis of oral lichen planus. Loss of autofluorescence with partial blanching was significantly associated with histopathological features noted in dysplastic and malignant lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence for the use of diascopic fluorescence as a technique to aid in clinical differentiation of benign inflammatory lesions from potentially malignant pathology. Based on the findings of this study, optical fluorescence imaging is a technique of added value in discernment of oral mucosal lesions, and our results support its clinical use.

Strategies to improve diagnosis and risk assessment for oral cancer patients

To realise the benefits of new diagnostic techniques for the prediction of oral cancer, further validation and multicentre analyses are needed to determine their clinical impact in contemporary practice.

Potential role of autofluorescence imaging in determining biopsy of oral potentially malignant disorders: A large prospective diagnostic study

Autofluorescence examination of oral tissues using the VELscope has been suggested as an adjunctive tool for cancer detection and diagnosis. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of VELscope in a large prospective study of 517 patients with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD). For the outcome assessments of discrimination of carcinoma form general OPMD and distinguishing high-risk lesions (moderate/severe dysplasia and carcinoma) from low-risk lesions (no/mild dysplasia), high sensitivity (100% and 95.9% respectively) and negative predictive value (100% and 98.2% respectively) were observed. All the carcinoma and showed loss of autofluorescence (LAF) and only 3 (0.6%) moderate/severe dysplasia were observed without LAF. These data indicate that the cases without LAF using VELscope substantially rule out the presence of high-risk lesions including cancer. This may prove to be useful specially to alleviate patient anxiety regarding a clinically suspicious oral lesion without the LAF, and to avoid a unnecessary biopsy for these cases. Collectively, a perspective to highlight was that a no biopsy strategy may be appropriate for OPMD without LAF using VELscope after conventional oral examination.

Optical fluorescence imaging in oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to systematically review the efficacy of direct optical fluorescence imaging as an adjunct to comprehensive oral examination in the clinical evaluation, risk assessment and surgical management of oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders.

METHODS

Studies adopting autofluorescence devices, evaluating the efficacy of comprehensive oral examination and optical fluorescence imaging in detection, visualisation or management of oral squamous cell carcinoma or oral potentially malignant disorders, as well as discriminating oral epithelial dysplasia from other mucosal lesions, were included in the literature search across bibliographic databases until October 2018.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were found to be eligible for inclusion in qualitative analysis. Of these, only six studies demonstrated a low risk of bias across all domains of the methodological assessment tool (QUADAS-2). Optical fluorescence imaging demonstrated positive results, with higher sensitivity scores, increased lesion detection and visualisation than comprehensive oral examination alone in the clinical evaluation of oral squamous cell carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides promising evidence for the utilisation of optical fluorescence imaging as an adjunct to comprehensive oral examination in varying clinical settings. It is important that devices utilising optical fluorescence imaging are viewed strictly as clinical adjuncts and not specifically as diagnostic devices.