Neuroimaging Association Scores: reliability and validity of aggregate measures of brain structural features linked to mental disorders in youth

Exploring Neuroimaging Association Scores in adulthood ADHD and middle-age trajectories

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder associated with brain differences in children, but not in adults. A combined evaluation of the regional brain differences could improve statistical power and, consequently, allow the detection of possible effects in adults. Thus, our aim is to verify whether Neuroimaging Association Scores (NAS) are associated with adulthood ADHD and clinical trajectories of the disorder in midlife. Clinical and neuroimaging data were collected for 121 subjects with ADHD (mean age: 47.1 ± 10.5; 43% male) and 82 controls (mean age: 38.2 ± 9.0; 54.9% male). Cases were assessed seven and thirteen years after baseline diagnosis, and their clinical trajectories were classified as stable if they fulfilled ADHD diagnosis in all assessments or unstable if they presented remission and recurrence of symptoms. Neuroimaging data were acquired in the last clinical assessment (thirteen years after baseline) and NAS were calculated as a weighted sum of the associations previously reported by meta-analyses for three types of structural brain modalities: cortical thickness, cortical surface area, and subcortical volume. The NAS for cortical surface area was higher in cases compared to controls. No association was found for NAS and number of symptoms of ADHD or clinical trajectories. The fact that differences were restricted to ADHD diagnostic status suggests a susceptibility effect that is not extended to subtle aspects of the disorder. Our results also suggest that evaluating overall effects may have advantages especially when applied to adult ADHD samples.

Neurodevelopmental risk and adaptation as a model for comorbidity among internalizing and externalizing disorders: genomics and cell-specific expression enriched morphometric study

BACKGROUND

Comorbidity is the rule rather than the exception for childhood and adolescent onset mental disorders, but we cannot predict its occurrence and do not know the neural mechanisms underlying comorbidity. We investigate if the effects of comorbid internalizing and externalizing disorders on anatomical differences represent a simple aggregate of the effects on each disorder and if these comorbidity-associated cortical surface differences relate to a distinct genetic underpinning.

METHODS

We studied the cortical surface area (SA) and thickness (CT) of 11,878 preadolescents (9-10 years) from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study. Linear mixed models were implemented in comparative and association analyses among internalizing (dysthymia, major depressive disorder, disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, agoraphobia, panic disorder, specific phobia, separation anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder), externalizing (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder) diagnostic groups, a group with comorbidity of the two and a healthy control group. Genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) and cell type specificity analysis were performed on 4468 unrelated European participants from this cohort.

RESULTS

Smaller cortical surface area but higher thickness was noted across patient groups when compared to controls. Children with comorbid internalizing and externalizing disorders had more pronounced areal reduction than those without comorbidity, indicating an additive burden. In contrast, cortical thickness had a non-linear effect with comorbidity: the comorbid group had no significant CT differences, while those patient groups without comorbidity had significantly higher thickness compare to healthy controls. Distinct biological pathways were implicated in regional SA and CT differences. Specifically, CT differences were associated with immune-related processes implicating astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, while SA-related differences related mainly to inhibitory neurons.

CONCLUSION

The emergence of comorbidity across distinct clusters of psychopathology is unlikely to be due to a simple additive neurobiological effect alone. Distinct developmental risk moderated by immune-related adaptation processes, with unique genetic and cell-specific factors, may contribute to underlying SA and CT differences. Children with the highest risk but lowest resilience, both captured in their developmental morphometry, may develop a comorbid illness pattern.