Organization of rhodopsin molecules in native membranes of rod cells–an old theoretical model compared to new experimental data

Fluorescence spectroscopy of rhodopsins: insights and approaches

Fluorescence spectroscopy has become an established tool at the interface of biology, chemistry and physics because of its exquisite sensitivity and recent technical advancements. However, rhodopsin proteins present the fluorescence spectroscopist with a unique set of challenges and opportunities due to the presence of the light-sensitive retinal chromophore. This review briefly summarizes some approaches that have successfully met these challenges and the novel insights they have yielded about rhodopsin structure and function. We start with a brief overview of fluorescence fundamentals and experimental methodologies, followed by more specific discussions of technical challenges rhodopsin proteins present to fluorescence studies. Finally, we end by discussing some of the unique insights that have been gained specifically about visual rhodopsin and its interactions with affiliate proteins through the use of fluorescence spectroscopy. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Retinal Proteins - You can teach an old dog new tricks.

Defining the interface between the C-terminal fragment of alpha-transducin and photoactivated rhodopsin

A novel combination of experimental data and extensive computational modeling was used to explore probable protein-protein interactions between photoactivated rhodopsin (R*) and experimentally determined R*-bound structures of the C-terminal fragment of alpha-transducin (Gt(alpha)(340-350)) and its analogs. Rather than using one set of loop structures derived from the dark-adapted rhodopsin state, R* was modeled in this study using various energetically feasible sets of intracellular loop (IC loop) conformations proposed previously in another study. The R*-bound conformation of Gt(alpha)(340-350) and several analogs were modeled using experimental transferred nuclear Overhauser effect data derived upon binding R*. Gt(alpha)(340-350) and its analogs were docked to various conformations of the intracellular loops, followed by optimization of side-chain spatial positions in both R* and Gt(alpha)(340-350) to obtain low-energy complexes. Finally, the structures of each complex were subjected to energy minimization using the OPLS/GBSA force field. The resulting residue-residue contacts at the interface between R* and Gt(alpha)(340-350) were validated by comparison with available experimental data, primarily from mutational studies. Computational modeling performed for Gt(alpha)(340-350) and its analogs when bound to R* revealed a consensus of general residue-residue interactions, necessary for efficient complex formation between R* and its Gt(alpha) recognition motif.

Modeling of the complex between transducin and photoactivated rhodopsin, a prototypical G-protein-coupled receptor

Obtaining a reliable 3D model for the complex formed by photoactivated rhodopsin (R*) and its G-protein, transducin (Gtalphabetagamma), would significantly benefit the entire field of structural biology of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In this study, we have performed extensive configurational sampling for the isolated C-terminal fragment of the alpha-subunit of transducin, Gtalpha 340-350, within cavities of photoactivated rhodopsin formed by different energetically feasible conformations of the intracellular loops. Our results suggested a new 3D model of the rhodopsin-transducin complex that fully satisfied all available experimental data on site-directed mutagenesis of rhodopsin and Gtalphabetagamma as well as data from disulfide-linking experiments. Importantly, the experimental data were not used as a priori constraints in model building. We performed a thorough comparison of existing computational models of the rhodopsin-transducin complex with each other and with current experimental data. It was found that different models suggest interactions with different molecules in the rhodopsin oligomer, that providing valuable guidance in design of specific novel experimental studies of the R*-Gtalphabetagamma complex. Finally, we demonstrated that the isolated Gtalpha 340-350 fragment does not necessarily bind rhodopsin in the same binding mode as the same segment in intact Gtalpha.

A beta-arrestin binding determinant common to the second intracellular loops of rhodopsin family G protein-coupled receptors

beta-Arrestins have been shown to inhibit competitively G protein-dependent signaling and to mediate endocytosis for many of the hundreds of nonvisual rhodopsin family G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). An open question of fundamental importance concerning the regulation of signal transduction of several hundred rhodopsin-like GPCRs is how these receptors of limited sequence homology, when considered in toto, can all recruit and activate the two highly conserved beta-arrestin proteins as part of their signaling/desensitization process. Although the serine and threonine residues that form GPCR kinase phosphorylation sites are common beta-arrestin-associated receptor determinants regulating receptor desensitization and internalization, the agonist-activated conformation of a GPCR probably reveals the most fundamental determinant mediating the GPCR and arrestin interaction. Here we identified a beta-arrestin binding determinant common to the rhodopsin family GPCRs formed from the proximal 10 residues of the second intracellular loop. We demonstrated by both gain and loss of function studies for the serotonin 2C, beta2-adrenergic, alpha2a)adrenergic, and neuropeptide Y type 2 receptors that the highly conserved amino acids, proline and alanine, naturally occurring in rhodopsin family receptors six residues distal to the highly conserved second loop DRY motif regulate beta-arrestin binding and beta-arrestin-mediated internalization. In particular, as demonstrated for the beta2 AR, this occurs independently of changes in GPCR kinase phosphorylation. These results suggest that a GPCR conformation directed by the second intracellular loop, likely using the loop itself as a binding patch, may function as a switch for transitioning beta-arrestin from its inactive form to its active receptor-binding state.