A systematic review and meta-analysis of the post-operative adverse effects associated with mosquito net mesh in comparison to commercial hernia mesh for inguinal hernia repair in low income countries

Prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using conventional versus custom-made (mosquito) mesh performed in Cameroon: a short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Adverse economic conditions often prevent the widespread implementation of modern surgical techniques in third world countries such as in Sub-Sahara Africa.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To demonstrate that a modern technique (laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty [TEP]) can safely be performed at significantly lower cost using inexpensive mesh material.

SETTINGS

Douala University Hospital Gynecology, Obstetrics and Pediatrics and two affiliated centers, Ayos Regional Hospital and Edéa Regional Hospital in Cameroon.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) of consecutive adult patients presenting with primary inguinal hernia treated by TEP, comparing implantation of sterilized mosquito mesh (MM) with conventional polypropylene mesh (CM). Primary endpoints were peroperative, early and midterm postoperative complications and hernia recurrence at 30 months.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (48 males) were randomized to MM (n = 32) or CM (n = 30). Groups were similar in age distribution and occupational features. Peroperative and early outcomes differed in terms of conversion rate (2/32 MM) due to external (electrical power supply) factors and mesh removal for early obstruction (1/30 CM). No outcome differences, including no recurrences, were noted after a median follow-up of 21 months.

CONCLUSION

In this RCT with medium-term follow-up, TEP performed with MM appears not inferior to CM.

Study of Operative Outcomes of Hernioplasty Using Mosquito Net Mesh at a Tertiary Hospital

Background

Synthetic mesh is the most efficient way to repair groin hernias. However, many patients in low and middle-income countries cannot afford the above-mentioned mesh. This study's goal was to describe the mosquito net mesh's (MNM) safety, viability, complications, and recurrence rate in hernioplasty done in rural populations.

Material and methods

This study was a single-centre, prospective, descriptive study, conducted in patients >18 years of age, of either gender, with unilateral or bilateral primary inguinal hernias (reducible/irreducible/bilateral hernia), admitted for elective or emergency open inguinal hernia mesh repair. The surgery was performed using reasonably priced (affordable to people of low socioeconomic status) polyethylene mosquito net mesh, which was cut into 8x16 cm rectangles and wrapped in two sealed plastic bags. They were sterilised using the ethylene oxide sterilisation (EtO) method. The type of hernia (unilateral or bilateral), post-operative pain, and complications were noted.

Results

Among 400 study participants, the incidence of inguinal hernia was highest in the 60-79 year age group (51.5%). Direct inguinal hernia (67.5 %) was higher compared to indirect inguinal hernia (32.5 %). While a majority of the participants had a hernia on the right side (50%), 164 patients (41%) had a hernia on the left side, and 36 patients (9%) had a bilateral inguinal hernia. The average operative time for unilateral inguinal hernia was 73.96 minutes and for bilateral inguinal hernia was 106.66 minutes. Out of 400 patients, 355 patients (88.75%) had no complications. Among the postoperative patients, 14 patients (3.5%) experienced surgical site infection; 9 patients (2.25%) experienced headache; 5 patients (1.25%) experienced hematoma; 12 patients (3%) experienced urinary retention; and 5 patients (1.25%) experienced testicular pain. The average hospital stay of patients was 4.25 days. Patients returned to their daily activities and employment in an average of 7.29 days. The market cost of a single standard polypropylene mesh was Rs.1,660/-. For making a single mosquito net mesh of the same size, we had an expenditure of Rs. 11.83/- including the cost of sterilization. In this study, 382 patients (95.5%) gave us good feedback, 11 patients (2.75) gave satisfactory feedback, and 7 patients (1.75%) gave excellent feedback.

Conclusion

In environments with limited resources, using mosquito net mesh for hernioplasty is reasonable, acceptable, doable, and economical.

Inguinal hernia repair: a global perspective

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations performed worldwide with most of the burden of these occurring in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs). There has been much research investigating the most effective method of hernia repair in resource-rich countries, however very little has been done to determine the most cost-beneficial method of hernia repair in LMICs.

METHODS

A systematic review of the English literature through PubMed and Scopus was conducted according to the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria of which 17 were randomised controlled trials and 11 were systematic reviews. Three areas of investigation were established from the literature search, namely operative method and type of mesh used (where applicable). Open-mesh procedures were shown to be less costly and have shorter operative times than laparoscopic methods. People who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair regularly returned to normal activities earlier than those who had open-mesh procedures. However, there was no other difference in complication rates between these two methods. Recent investigations have revealed that sterilised synthetic mosquito net was similar to hernia-specific meshes whilst significantly reducing cost.

CONCLUSION

We postulate that the most cost-beneficial method of hernia repair for implementation in LMICs is using open-mesh procedures with sterilised mosquito net under local anaesthetic. Further cost-benefit research is required in this area.

Muheza approach: a sustainable mesh hernia service in a resource-poor setting and developing a national methodology to hernia surgery in Tanzania

BACKGROUND

Hernias are amongst the most common general surgical problems worldwide. In 2019, an estimated 800 000 inguinal hernias remain untreated in Tanzania. Furthermore, only 5% of hernias in Africa are repaired with mesh due to costs, resulting in high recurrence rates. We describe the establishment of a safe, sustainable and affordable mesh hernia programme in Tanzania.

METHODS

Hernia repairs were performed by a UK Consultant General Surgeon and two Tanzanian Surgical Assistant Medical Officers between November 2018 and April 2019. Tanzanian Assistant Medical Officers were taught in a modular fashion. Polyethylene 'mosquito net' mesh was sterilized using a steam autoclave on site. A standardized approach to intraoperative technique and perioperative care was adopted. Patients were followed up and a registry maintained.

RESULTS

A total of 50 mesh hernia repairs were performed on all-comers between November 2018 and April 2019. One additional hernia repair was carried out without mesh as the hernia contained perforated bowel with faecal contamination. Of the 50 patients, 47 were followed up. At 2 weeks, none were found to have recurrence, none had evidence of infection and none reported numbness. Of the 47 patients, nine reported low-grade discomfort. On further follow-up, the pain resolved in seven of the nine patients, and the remaining two reported persistent low-grade discomfort (both recurrent hernias with the reported pain less than preoperatively).

CONCLUSION

Proposals have been accepted for a Tanzania National Hernia Project, which aims to establish mesh repair as the gold-standard approach to inguinal hernia surgery across Tanzania. Through education and collaboration, this project hopes to address the major outstanding health issue of untreated hernias in Tanzania.

Improving surgical education in East Africa with a standardized hernia training program

INTRODUCTION

Inguinal hernias are among the most common surgical diseases in Africa. The current International HerniaSurge Guidelines recommend mesh-based surgical techniques in Low Resource Settings (LRS). This recommendation is currently unachievable in large parts of Africa due to the unaffordability of mesh and lack of appropriate training of the few available surgeons. There is, therefore, a need for formal training in mesh surgery. There is an experience in Hernia Repair for the Underserved in Central and South America, however, inadequate evidence of structured training in Africa.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Since 2016, the aid Organizations, Surgeons for Africa and Operation Hernia have developed and employed a structured hernia surgical training program for postgraduate surgical trainees and medical doctors in Rwanda. This course consists of lectures on relevant aspects of hernia surgery and hands-on training in operating theatres. The lectures emphasize anatomy and surgical technique. All parts of the training were evaluated. Formal pre-course evaluation was conducted to assess the personal surgical experience of the trainees.

RESULTS

Over a 3-year period, a structured hernia training programme was employed to train a total of 36 surgical trainees in both mesh and also non mesh hernia surgery. The key principle in this course is the continuous competence assessment and feedback. Evidence is provided to demonstrate improvement in surgical skills as well as knowledge of surgical anatomy which is essential to acquiring surgical competency. With self-assessment, expressed on a Likert scale, the participants could improve the theoretical knowledge about hernias from median 4.4 (on a scale of 1-10) before training to 8.4 after the training. The specific knowledge about anatomy could be improved in the same assessment from 4.8 before training to 8.1. after the training. After training course 12 of the 36 participants (33.33%) were able to carry out both suture- and mesh-based operations of simple inguinal hernias completely and independently. 20 of the 36 participants (55.55%) required only minimal supervision and only four participants (11.11%) required surgical supervision even after the completion of the course.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated that, medical personnel in Africa can be trained in mesh and non-mesh hernia surgery using a structured training programme.

Hernioplasty using low-cost mesh compared to surgical mesh in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to assess the differences in surgical outcomes between hernioplasty using low-cost mesh and surgical mesh in adults undergoing elective hernioplasty in low- and middle-income countries.

INTRODUCTION

The use of untreated mosquito netting in inguinal hernioplasty in low- and middle-income countries has been well described in the literature, with two recent limited systematic reviews finding equivalent postoperative surgical outcomes. This comprehensive review, across a wider set of databases and gray literature, will assess a broader set of outcomes including patient and surgeon preference and sterility, report more granular complication outcomes, and include other low-cost mesh alternatives such as resterilized surgical mesh and indigenous products, alongside mosquito net mesh.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Adult patients undergoing elective inguinal hernioplasty with mesh in low- and middle-income countries.

METHODS

Electronic bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) and gray literature databases and trial registers will be searched for experimental studies, either randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials, comparing hernioplasty with surgical mesh versus low-cost mesh, published in any language from 2000 to the present. Two independent reviewers will conduct the literature search, screen titles and abstracts, assess full-text studies for inclusion, assess methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool, and extract data using a custom extraction tool. Synthesis will involve pooling for statistical meta-analysis with either a random-effects or fixed-effects model, as appropriate, and where this is not possible, findings will be presented in narrative form.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42019136028.

Use of commercial mesh for hernia repair in a low resource setting: experience after 500 cases

BACKGROUND

The use of mesh has revolutionized the management of hernias in many parts of the world. There is, however, limited experience on its use in sub-Saharan Africa. This study describes a single hospital experience after 500 cases of mesh hernia repairs in a sub-Saharan African country.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of the first 500 cases of abdominal wall hernia operations performed using commercial mesh since year 2007. Socio-demographic characteristics, hernia type, method of repair and outcome data were analyzed and presented as descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The first 500 cases of mesh hernia repairs were performed between 2007 and 2017 during which a total of 1,175 hernia operations were carried out, mesh repair accounting for 42.5% of the total. There was a progressive rise in the uptake of mesh repairs over time, with mesh repairs overtaking tissue based repairs in the last few years of the review. Inguinal hernia was by far the commonest indication for mesh use (80.4%), followed by incisional hernia (9%). Polypropylene mesh was the most common type of mesh used in about 96.2% of cases. Overall, there were seven recurrences (1.4%) at a mean follow-up period of 15.3 months (1-108 months) CONCLUSION: In spite of resource limitations, the use of mesh for hernia repairs continues to rise and has overtaken tissue-based repairs in a sub-Saharan African setting. Results show good outcomes justifying continued use.

An in vitro study on the biocompatibility of fibroblasts in sterile and non-sterile low-cost and commercial meshes

INTRODUCTION

Despite several successful studies with low-cost meshes (LCM) for the treatment of inguinal hernias in India and Africa, a nationwide application has not been possible for a variety of reasons. One problem is the special preparation and sterilization of these meshes-naturally, they should comply with international standards and demands, which is often difficult to achieve in Africa. Our primary approach was to determine whether there are differences in the biocompatibility of fibroblasts between non-sterile and sterile LCMs and commercial meshes (CM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two polyester CMs with different pore size and a polyester LCM were examined as both sterile and non-sterile. LCM was plasma sterilized at 60 °C and steam sterilized at 134 °C. Sterile and non-sterile meshes were soaked with an antibiotic (penicillin/streptomycin) and antimycotic solution (amphotericin B). Human fibroblasts from healthy subcutaneous tissue were used. Various tests for evaluating the growth behavior and cell morphology of human fibroblasts were conducted. Semiquantitative (light microscopy) and qualitative (scanning electron microscopy) analyses were performed after 1 week and again after 12 weeks. The metabolism of fibroblasts was checked by pH measurements and glucose analyses. Biocompatibility of fibroblasts on sterile and non-sterile meshes was carried out by luminescence methods (cell viability and apoptosis) as well as calorimetric methods for proliferation determination (BrDU assay) and cytotoxicity (LDH assay).

RESULTS

Light and electron microscopy revealed a moderate growth of fibroblasts on all investigated mesh types. The results of glycolysis and the pH value were within the normal range for all sterile and non-sterile meshes. In biocompatibility studies, no elevated level of apoptosis was detected. The viability measurement of mitochondrial activity of fibroblasts showed a 50% inhibition of mitochondria in all nets, with the exception of non-sterile CM, whereas mitochondrial activity was increased in the non-sterile CM. A proliferation measurement (BrdU test) revealed different growth inhibition in the sterile and non-sterile meshes. This growth inhibition was significantly stronger, particularly for non-sterile CM light meshes, than it was for the non-sterile LCM.

CONCLUSION

Again, our studies show no significant differences in biocompatibility of fibroblasts between expensive and low-cost meshes. In addition, we detected fibroblast growth even in sterile meshes, independent of the mesh group. To our knowledge, the present study is the first of its kind in terms of qualitative equivalence of sterile and non-sterile in vitro mesh samples. We do not wish to create future patient studies with non-sterilized meshes saturated with antibiotics/antimycotics. However, perhaps we can prove in future studies that under semi-sterile conditions with certain LCMs, wound infection rates can be acceptable.

Meta-analysis of the use of sterilized mosquito net mesh for inguinal hernia repair in less economically developed countries

Background

Inguinal hernias are common in less economically developed countries (LEDCs), and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Tension-free mesh repair is the standard treatment worldwide. Lack of resources combined with the high cost of commercial synthetic mesh (CSM) have limited its use in LEDCs. Sterilized mosquito net mesh (MNM) has emerged as a low-cost, readily available alternative to CSM. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MNM for the use in hernia repair in LEDCs.

Methods

A systematic review and data meta-analysis of all published articles from inception to August 2018 was performed. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched. The primary outcome measure was the overall postoperative complication rate of hernia repair when using MNM. Secondary outcome measures were comparisons between MNM and CSM with regard to overall complication rate, wound infection, chronic pain and haematoma formation.

Results

A total of nine studies were considered relevant (3 RCTs, 1 non-randomized trial and 5 prospective studies), providing a total cohort of 1085 patients using MNM. The overall complication rate for hernia repair using MNM was 9·3 per cent. There was no significant difference between MNM and CSM regarding the overall postoperative complication rate (odds ratio 0·99, 95 per cent c.i. 0·65 to 1·53; P = 0·98), severe or chronic pain (OR 2·52, 0·36 to 17·42; P = 0·35), infection (OR 0·56, 0·19 to 1·61; P = 0·28) or haematoma (OR 1·05, 0·62 to 1·78; P = 0·86).

Conclusion

MNM has a low overall postoperative complication rate and is unlikely to be inferior to CSM in terms of safety and efficacy. MNM is a suitable low-cost alternative to CSM in the presence of financial constraint.

Mesh implants for hernia repair: an update

INTRODUCTION

Today the use of textile meshes has become a standard for the treatment of abdominal wall hernias and for the reinforcement of any tissue repair as the strength of the implant decreases the recurrence rates. With increasing use, side effects of the textile implants became apparent, as well.

AREAS COVERED

Based on publications in Medline over the past decade, general and specific benefits, as well as risks, are discussed with the challenge to define individual risk-benefit ratios. For meshes, certain high-risk or low-risk conditions can be defined. In an attempt to eliminate mesh-related risks, quality control for medical devices has meanwhile been revised. In both the USA and the EU post-market surveillance studies are required to keep medical devices approved.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The impact of material on the complication rate will vary depending on the patient's co-morbidity or the risks of the procedure. Even the best material can end up with disappointing results in case of poor healing or poor surgery. On the other hand, when using high-risk devices, most of the complications after excellent surgery with excellent indication can be supposed to be mesh-related. Thus, the use of low-risk devices is recommended even though its advantage may not be demonstrable in clinical studies.

Autoinflammatory/autoimmunity syndrome induced by adjuvants (Shoenfeld's syndrome) in patients after a polypropylene mesh implantation

In both hernia repair and pelvic organ prolapse surgery, polypropylene (PP) meshes are increasingly used. Although these technologies offer tremendous clinical benefits, the efficacy of these implants can be hindered by the body's immunologic reaction to the implanted material. Undesirable local effects such as chronic pain have been extensively described. Systemic effects, however, are not yet reported. Because systemic effects after implantation of other biomaterials have been described, we evaluated patients with implanted PP meshes for signs and symptoms of biomaterial-related systemic illnesses. Patients referred to an Autoimmunity Clinic between January 2014 and December 2017 were analyzed. In 40 patients, mesh implants were present. These patients were evaluated for the development of a systemic illness. Thirty-two consecutive women and eight men were included in the current study. Median age at the time of operation was 49.5 years (range, 28-75 years). Eighteen patients had a hernia repair and 22 patients had a vaginal mesh implant. Thirty-nine of 40 patients presented with chronic fatigue, and 38 of 40 patients had myalgia or muscle weakness. In most patients, these symptoms started shortly after the operation. All patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for autoinflammatory/autoimmunity syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA). In addition, most patients reported localized pain and (often-invalidating) irritable bowel syndrome. One quarter of the patients had an immunodeficiency, whereas a diagnosis of well-established systemic and/or localized autoimmune diseases was made in 45% of patients. Importantly, 75% of patients had a pre-existing allergic disease. In 6 patients, the hernia mesh could be completely removed, thereby resulting in (partial) recovery of the systemic disease. In conclusion, 40 patients developed symptoms of a systemic illness after a mesh operation. All patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for ASIA. One quarter of the patients had an immunodeficiency, whereas in approximately half of the patients, an autoimmune disease developed. We postulate that PP mesh implants may increase the risk of developing (auto)immune diseases by acting as an adjuvant.