The influence of a multidisciplinary team meeting and prehabilitation on complex abdominal wall hernia repair outcomes

Preoperative anaesthesia and other team meetings for complex cases: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

The conventional two-step process for surgical procedures - surgical followed by anaesthetic consultation - may not adequately address the needs of complex cases involving high-risk patients or procedures, leading to increased risks of adverse events. Although surgical team meetings (STM) and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) were implemented many years ago, anaesthesia team meetings (ATM) have recently emerged as potential solutions to enhance perioperative management.

PURPOSE

We aim to systematically review and summarize the existing literature that reflects the main theoretical approaches, practices, effects, and clinical relevance of preoperative team meetings - with specific consideration to preoperative ATM - in managing difficult cases.

METHODS

We performed a narrative review of the literature (1980-2024) to identify studies focusing on the practice and the impact of preoperative meetings on patient outcomes, compliance with treatment plans, and teamwork quality. We provide here a qualitative synthesis of the findings.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were identified: 11 consider preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM), 2 consider preoperative surgical team meeting (STM), and only one anaesthesia team meeting (ATM).

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently not enough robust evidence that preoperative team meetings clearly improve hard patient's outcome parameters. And the place for ATM does not appear to have been studied to date. There is a need for well-designed studies to explore the impact of preoperative ATM on clinical practice improvement, quality of care, and patient outcomes.

Comprehensive retrospective analysis of the European hernia Society quality of life in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to analyze the European Hernia Society Quality of Life (EHS-QoL) in abdominal wall reconstruction by comparing preoperative scores with those at 1 and 2 postoperative years.

METHODS

Data from 105 patients with complex incisional hernias were collected preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Statistical analyses included three ART ANOVA models to compare scores among the three time points and within each time point's items.

RESULTS

The EHS score significantly decreased from preoperative (Mdn ​= ​57) to 1 year (Mdn ​= ​10.5) and 2 years postoperative (Mdn ​= ​8). The most significant changes occurred between preoperative and 1-year measurements, particularly in pain levels during activities and limitations in heavy labor and activities outside the home.

CONCLUSION

Patients' quality of life notably improved at 1 year post-surgery, with some reaching near-maximum levels, and this improvement was generally sustained or increased at 2 years post-surgery.

The Impact of a Specialized Hernia Center and Standardized Practices on Surgical Outcomes in Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: Hernia registries report that guidelines are not always implemented by general surgeons and suggest that the success rate of this procedure is higher in hernia specialty centers. There are many definitions of hernia centers, but their objectives consist of improving healthcare by homogenizing the clinical practice. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze hernia centers' definitions and compare hernia centers with non-specialized centers. Material and Methods: Cochrane Central, Scopus, Scielo, and PubMed were systematically searched for studies defining a hernia center or comparing hernia centers and non-specialized centers. Outcomes assessed were recurrence, surgical site events, hospital length of stay (LOS), and operative time. We performed subgroup analyses of hernia type. Statistical analysis was performed with R Studio. Results: 3,260 studies were screened and 88 were thoroughly reviewed. Thirteen studies were included. Five studies defined a hernia center and eight studies, comprising 141,366 patients, compared a hernia center with a non-specialized center. Generally, the definitions were similar in decision-making and educational requirements but differed in structural aspects and the steps required for the certification. We found lower recurrence rates for hernia centers for both inguinal (1.08% versus 5.11%; RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.23; p < 0.001) and ventral hernia (3.2% vs. 8.9%; RR 0.425; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.64; p < 0.001). Hernia centers also presented lower surgical site infection for both ventral (4.3% vs. 11.9%; RR 0.435; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.90; p = 0.026) and inguinal (0.1% vs. 0.52%; RR 0.15; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.99; p = 0.49) repair. Conclusion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis support that a hernia center establishment improves postoperative outcomes data. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024522263, PROSPERO CRD42024522263.

Prevention of component separation in complex abdominal wall surgery by Botox prehabilitation: a propensity-matched study

AIM

To facilitate midline fascial closure in complex abdominal wall surgery, component separation techniques (CST) are usually required. However, CST is associated with an enlarged morbidity. Prehabilitation could increase the compliance of the abdominal wall and thereby decrease the necessity of myofascial release. This can be accomplished by administration of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) in the lateral abdominal wall musculature. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of BTA on the subsequent necessity to perform CST in patients with complex abdominal wall hernias.

METHODS

Patients with a complex abdominal wall hernia, planned to undergo CST between July 2020 and November 2022 were included. Outcome of procedures with 300U of BTA 4 (2-6) weeks prior to surgery, were retrospectively analyzed by comparison with propensity matched subjects of an historical group. Hernia width difference was assessed by CT and operative details were included.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients with a median hernia width of 12 cm (IQR 9-14, range 24) were prehabilitated with BTA between July 2020 and November 2022. A CST was planned for all, however not required in 6/13 patients (46%) to accomplish midline fascial closure. A mean elongation of lateral abdominal wall musculature of 4.01 cm was seen in patients not requiring CST. Compared to the propensity score matched control group, a 27% reduction (p = 0.08) in the need for CST was observed.

CONCLUSION

There is a tendency for decrease of necessity for CST by preoperatively administered BTA in patients with complex abdominal wall defects. Although small, as this study used propensity matched comparison, further exploration of BTA should be encouraged.

Exploring Variable Approaches in Complex Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Surgeons have long grappled with categorizing complex hernias, leading to varied interpretations and fluctuating incidence rates. Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction (CAWR) addresses repairs for large hernias, with defined factors including size, previous repairs, mesh placement, infections, and comorbidities. This review explores pivotal surgical techniques for complex hernia repair, starting with Preoperative Progressive Pneumoperitoneum (PPP) and progressing to innovative methods like Botulinum Toxin Type A. Mesh fixation, both open and laparoscopic, plays a crucial role, with synthetic and biological mesh options discussed. Hybrid techniques and the "sandwich" approach are proposed for intricate cases. Each technique presents advantages and limitations, emphasizing the ongoing quest for optimal outcomes.

The modified frailty index predicts postoperative morbidity in elective hernia repair patients: analysis of the national inpatient sample 2015-2019

PURPOSE

Frailty has shown promise in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality following hernia surgery. This study aims to evaluate the predictive capacity of the 11-item modified frailty index (mFI) in estimating postoperative outcomes following elective hernia surgery using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the NIS from 2015 to 2019 was performed including adult patients who underwent elective hernia repair. The mFI was used to stratify patients as either frail (mFI ≥ 0.27) or robust (mFI < 0.27). The primary outcomes were in-hospital postoperative morbidity and mortality. The secondary outcomes were system-specific morbidity, length of stay (LOS), total in-hospital healthcare cost, and discharge disposition. Univariable and multivariable regressions were utilized.

RESULTS

In total, 14,125 robust patients and 1704 frail patients were included. Frailty was associated with an increased age (mean age 66.4 years vs. 52.6 years, p < 0.001) and prevalence of ventral hernias (51.9% vs. 44.4%, p < 0.001). Adjusted analyses demonstrated that frail patients had increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.89, 95% CI 1.50, 10.11, p = 0.005), postoperative overall morbidity (aOR 1.98, 95% CI 1.72, 2.29, p < 0.001), postoperative LOS (adjusted mean difference (aMD) 0.78 days, 95% CI 0.51, 1.06, p < 0.001), total in-hospital healthcare costs (aMD $7562 95% CI 3292, 11,832, p = 0.001), and were less likely to be discharged home (aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53, 0.69, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The mFI may be a reliable predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality in elective hernia surgery. Utilizing this tool can aid in patient education and identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from tailored prehabilitation.

Staged abdominal wall reconstruction in the setting of complex gastrointestinal reconstruction

PURPOSE

Literature on one- versus two-staged abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with complex gastrointestinal reconstruction (GIR) is limited to single-arm case series with a focus on patients who complete all planned stages. Herein, we describe our experience with both one- and two-staged approaches to AWR/GIR, with attention to those who did not complete both intended stages.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted to identify patients who underwent a one- or two-stage approach to GIR/AWR from 2013 to 2020. The one-stage approach included GIR and definitive sublay mesh herniorrhaphy. The two-stage approach included Stage 1 (S1)-GIR and non-definitive herniorrhaphy and Stage 2 (S2)-definitive sublay mesh herniorrhaphy.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients underwent GIR/AWR: 20 (37.0%) underwent a planned 1-stage operation while 34 (63.0%) underwent S1 of a planned 2-stage approach. Patients assigned to the 2-stage approach were more likely to be smokers, have a history of mesh infection, have an enterocutaneous fistula, and a contaminated wound class (p<0.05). Of the 34 patients who underwent S1, 12 (35.3%) completed S2 during the mean follow-up period of 44 months while 22 (64.7%) did not complete S2. Of these, 10 (45.5%) developed hernia recurrence but did not undergo S2 secondary to elective nonoperative management (40%), pending preoperative optimization (30%), additional complex GIR (10%), hernia-related incarceration requiring emergent surgery (10%), or unrelated death (10%). No differences in outcome including SSI, SSO, readmission, and recurrence were noted between the 12 patients who completed the two-stage approach and the 20 patients who completed a one-stage approach, despite increased risk factors for complications in the 2-stage group (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Planned two-stage operations for GIR/AWR may distribute operative complexity and post-operative morbidity into separate surgical interventions. However, many patients may never undergo the intended definitive S2 herniorrhaphy. Future evaluation of 1- versus 2-stage GIR/AWR is needed to clarify indications for each approach. This work must also consider the frequent deviations from intended clinical course demonstrated in this study.

[Loss of domain and reduction in median suture tension]

BACKGROUND

Abdominal wall reconstruction in large incisional hernia/laparostoma poses a particular challenge. A loss of domain is the extreme form of intestinal volume displacement. The challenge lies in overcoming retraction of the lateral abdominal muscles.

OBJECTIVE

Experienced surgeons have access to a variety of techniques aimed at gaining lateral length along the abdominal wall or reducing suture tension at the midline. These techniques are intended to facilitate reconstruction even in complex cases and are outlined in this article from a practical perspective.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The application of botulinum toxin A (BTA) and progressive pneumoperitoneum (PPP) are described as preoperative methods to gain abdominal wall length. Peritoneal flaps, intraoperative fascial traction (IFT) and component separation including transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) are available for the surgical reconstruction of the abdominal wall. Bridging and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh approach are fallback techniques. All these techniques were integrated into a practical algorithm for complex abdominal wall reconstruction including preoperative and postoperative care and assessed by the authors with respect to effort, effectiveness and complexity.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In the opinion of the authors, the status of complex abdominal wall reconstruction is currently best described by a combination of the most effective and proven techniques in terms of a "categorical algorithm". The combination of BTA, IFT and TAR presently appears to be the most effective method; however, experience and expertise are a prerequisite.