Identification and evaluation of 55 genetic variations in the BRCA1 and the BRCA2 genes of patients from 50 Japanese breast cancer families

K3326X and Other C-Terminal BRCA2 Variants Implicated in Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: A Review

Whole genome analysis and the search for mutations in germline and tumor DNAs is becoming a major tool in the evaluation of risk as well as the management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Because of the identification of cancer predisposition gene panels, thousands of such variants have been catalogued yet many remain unclassified, presenting a clinical challenge for the management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Although algorithms exist to estimate the likelihood of a variant being deleterious, these tools are rarely used for clinical decision-making. Here, we review the progress in classifying K3326X, a rare truncating variant on the C-terminus of BRCA2 and review recent literature on other novel single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs, on the C-terminus of the protein, defined in this review as the portion after the final BRC repeat (amino acids 2058-3418).

Next generation sequencing analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 identifies novel variations in breast cancer

Mutations in two major breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, have been identified to be the most important predisposing factors for the development of breast cancer. Thus, BRCA1/2 testing is a well-established method of choice for the assessment of developing breast cancer. Accordingly, here we aimed to report novel BRCA1/2 variations and distribution of previously known mutations and their association with the clinical course of breast cancer disease. A total of 287 breast cancer patients were enrolled from January 2017 through December 2019. Of these patients, 50 of them were identified to be positive for BRCA1/2. Next Generation Sequencing analysis was performed for the screening of exonic and intronic variations of BRCA1/BRCA2 genes. Notably, novel variations of 4448 G > A (Ser1843Asn) in BRCA1, and 982dupA (Thr328AspfsTer) and 7588C > T (Gln2530Ter) in BRCA2 gene were identified. The most common variations in BRCA1 gene were 5152 + 66G > A, 442-34C > T and 5266dupC. In BRCA2 gene, the most common variations were 9097dupA, 67 + 1G > A and 1114A > C. Novel variations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were identified in breast cancer and might be useful predisposing factors in breast cancer diagnosis.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a sample of breast and ovarian cancer families from the Colombian pacific

Introduction:

Breast cancer is the most common neoplasia of women from all over the world especially women from Colombia. 5%­10% of all cases are caused by hereditary factors, 25% of those cases have mutations in the BRCA1/BRCA2 genes.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to identify the mutations associated with the risk of familial breast and/or ovarian cancer in a population of Colombian pacific.

Methods:

58 high-risk breast and/or ovarian cancer families and 20 controls were screened for germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, by Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism (SSCP) and sequencing.

Results:

Four families (6.9%) were found to carry BRCA1 mutations and eight families (13.8%) had mutations in BRCA2. In BRCA1, we found three Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS), of which we concluded, using in silico tools, that c.81­12C>G and c.3119G>A (p.Ser1040Asn) are probably deleterious, and c.3083G>A (p.Arg1028His) is probably neutral. In BRCA2, we found three variants of uncertain significance: two were previously described and one novel mutation. Using in silico analysis, we concluded that c.865A>G (p.Asn289Asp) and c.6427T>C (p.Ser2143Pro) are probably deleterious and c.125A>G (p.Tyr42Cys) is probably neutral. Only one of them has previously been reported in Colombia. We also identified 13 polymorphisms (4 in BRCA1 and 9 in BRCA2), two of them are associated with a moderate increase in breast cancer risk (BRCA2 c.1114A>C and c.8755­66T>C).

Conclusion:

According to our results, the Colombian pacific population presents diverse mutational spectrum for BRCA genes that differs from the findings in other regions in the country.

Analysis of p.Gly12Valfs*2, p.Trp24* and p.Trp77Arg mutations in GJB2 and p.Arg81Gln variant in LRTOMT among non syndromic hearing loss Egyptian patients: implications for genetic diagnosis

Hearing loss (HL) is a global sensory disorder that affects children and deprives them from their rights to enjoy standard social and educational levels. Although hundreds of genetic mutations across several genes have been linked to HL, very limited studies are available on Egyptian population which has high rate of consanguinity and HL. The frequency of the p.Gly12Valfs*2, p.Trp24* and p.Trp77Arg mutations in GJB2 along with the p.Arg81Gln variant in LRTOMT gene was investigated in Egyptian patients. 103 non-syndromic HL (NSHL) Egyptian patients and 100 control subjects were recruited in this study. PCR-RFLP and Direct sequencing were performed to screen and confirm presence/absence of those mutations in Egyptian population. The p.Gly12Valfs*2 mutation was found in eight patients (7.8%) (six homozygous and two heterozygous) with an allele frequency of 6.8%. The p.Trp24* and p.Trp77Arg were absent in both HL patients and controls. Another one patient had the heterozygous variant for p.Arg81Gln in LRTOMT gene. This study reports, for the first time, the presence of a heterozygous change for the p.Arg81Gln in LRTOMT gene in one Egyptian patient. The p.Gly12Valfs*2 mutation, but not the p.Trp24* nor the p.Trp77Arg, in GJB2 is the most frequent variant among Egyptian patients and would therefore be recommended for genetic counseling and diagnosis.

BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in Japanese women with ductal carcinoma in situ

Background

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a component of the clinical spectrum of breast cancer even in those with BRCA1/2 mutation. The aim of this study was to report the feature of DCIS raised in Japanese women with BRCA1/2 mutations.

Methods

A total of 325 Japanese women with breast cancer (BC) (with or without invasive cancer) were referred for genetic counseling and underwent genetic testing for mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Showa University Hospital between December 2011 and August 2016. And 49 of them who were pathologically diagnosed as DCIS were included in this study. Logistic regression models were fit to determine the associations between potential predictive factors and BRCA status. A Cox proportional hazards model is used to predictive value of parameters for Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and contralateral breast tumor recurrence (CBTR).

Results

(a) Of 325 patients (with or without invasive cancer), 19.1% (62/325) tested positive for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. And 18.4% (9/49) was positive for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in DCIS, compared with 19.2% (53/276) in IDC (p = 1.000). Among BRCA mutations, 14.5% (9/62) had DCIS compared with nonmutations (15.2%, 40/263). Incidence of DCIS was 3.0% (1/33) of BRCA1 mutations and 27.5% (8/29) of BRCA2 mutation (p = 0.009). (b) Median age of diagnosis in BRCA mutation carriers was 39 years, compared with 46 years in noncarriers. Age, Family history (FH) of BC, FH of first or second BC and total number of relatives with BC diagnosis (DX) has significant difference between BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers in univariate analysis. In a multivariate logistic model, total relatives with BC DX ≥ 2 (odds ratio [OR], 5.128; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.266–20.763; p = 0.022), age at diagnosis ≤35 years (OR 0.149, 95% CI 0.023–0.954, p = 0.045) and ER+/HER2+ status (OR 5.034, 95% CI 1.092–23.210, p = 0.038) remained as independent significant predictors for BRCA mutation. Ki67 index (cut off by 14% or 30%) did not differ between BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers (p = 0.459 and p = 0.651). (c) There was a significant difference in ER‐positive tumors among BRCA2 carriers and noncarriers (p = 0.042). Subgroup analysis showed BRCA2 carriers tend to be of higher grade (Grade 2 and 3), more frequently ER+/PR+ (p = 0.041) and lower proliferation (Ki67 index) than noncarriers, whereas differences in nuclear grade and ki67 index were not found significantly in our study. (d) BRCA mutation was not associated with an increased risk of IBTR and CBTR.

Conclusion

DCIS is equally as prevalent in patients who were BRCA mutation carriers as in high familial‐risk women who were noncarriers, but occurs at earlier age. BRCA2 carriers have higher incidence in DCIS than that of BRCA1 carriers, and tend to be higher grade and more frequently ER positive and lower proliferation. Total relatives with BC DX ≥2, age at diagnosis ≤35 years and ER+/HER2+ might be independent predictors for BRCA mutation in Japanese women with DCIS and patients of these risk factors should be recommended to receive genetic counseling and BRCA testing.

Increased centrosome number in BRCA-related breast cancer specimens determined by immunofluorescence analysis

BRCA‐related breast carcinoma can be prevented through prophylactic surgery and an intensive follow‐up regimen. However, BRCA genetic tests cannot be routinely performed, and some BRCA mutations could not be defined as deleterious mutations or normal variants. Therefore, an easy functional assay of BRCA will be useful to evaluate BRCA status. As it has been reported that BRCA functions in the regulation of centrosome number, we focused on centrosome number in cancer tissues. Here, 70 breast cancer specimens with known BRCA status were analyzed using immunofluorescence of γ‐tubulin (a marker of centrosome) foci. The number of foci per cell was higher in cases with BRCA mutation compared to wild‐type cases, that is, 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5‐2.3) vs 0.5 (95% CI, 0.2‐0.8) (P < .001). Specifically, foci numbers per cell in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation cases were 1.2 (95% CI, 0.6‐1.8) and 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7‐2.6), respectively, both higher than those in wild‐type cases (P = .042 and P < .0001, respectively). The predictive value of γ‐tubulin foci as determined by area under the curve (AUC = 0.86) for BRCA status was superior to BRCAPRO (AUC = 0.69), Myriad Table (AUC = 0.61), and KOHBRA BRCA risk calculator (AUC = 0.65) pretest values. The use of γ‐tubulin foci to predict BRCA status had sensitivity = 83% (19/23), specificity = 89% (42/47), and positive predictive value = 77% (20/26). Thus, γ‐tubulin immunofluorescence, a functional assessment of BRCA, can be used as a new prospective test of BRCA status.

Advances in ligase chain reaction and ligation-based amplifications for genotyping assays: Detection and applications

Genetic variants have been reported to cause several genetic diseases. Various genotyping assays have been developed for diagnostic and screening purposes but with certain limitations in sensitivity, specificity, cost effectiveness and/or time savings. Since the discovery of ligase chain reaction (LCR) in the late nineties, it became one of the most favored platforms for detecting these variants and also for genotyping low abundant contaminants. Recent and powerful modifications with the integration of various detection strategies such as electrochemical and magnetic biosensors, nanoparticles (NPs), quantum dots, quartz crystal and leaky surface acoustic surface biosensors, DNAzyme, rolling circle amplification (RCA), strand displacement amplification (SDA), surface enhanced raman scattering (SERS), chemiluminescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer have been introduced to both LCR and ligation based amplifications to enable high-throughput and inexpensive multiplex genotyping with improved robustness, simplicity, sensitivity and specificity. In this article, classical and up to date modifications in LCR and ligation based amplifications are critically evaluated and compared with emphasis on points of strength and weakness, sensitivity, cost, running time, equipment needed, applications and multiplexing potential. Versatile genotyping applications such as genetic diseases detection, bacterial and viral pathogens detection are also detailed. Ligation based gold NPs biosensor, ligation based RCA and ligation mediated SDA assays enhanced detection limit tremendously with a discrimination power approaching 1.5aM, 2aM and 0.1fM respectively. MLPA (multiplexed ligation dependent probe amplification) and SNPlex assays have been commercialized for multiplex detection of at least 48 SNPs at a time. MOL-PCR (multiplex oligonucleotide ligation) has high-throughput capability with multiplex detection of 50 SNPs/well in a 96 well plate. Ligase detection reaction (LDR) is one of the most widely used LCR versions that have been successfully integrated with several detection strategies with improved sensitivity down to 0.4fM.

Distribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Asian Patients with Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer in Asian females, and the incidence of breast cancer has been increasing in Asia. Because Asian patients develop breast cancer at a younger age than their Caucasian counterparts, the contributions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations in Asians are expected to be different than in Caucasians. The prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in the Asian population varies among countries and studies. Most Asian studies have reported more frequent mutations in BRCA2 than in BRCA1, with the exception of studies from India and Pakistan. In addition, the contribution of large genomic rearrangements of BRCA1/2 genes is relatively small in Asian populations in comparison to other ethnic populations. Various statistical models for the prediction of BRCA1/2 mutations have underestimated the risk of having these genetic mutations in Asians, especially in predicting BRCA2 gene mutation. Until recently, BRCA1/2 mutation analyses in Asia were mostly conducted by independent single institutions with different patient selection criteria and using various genotyping methods. However, a couple of Asian groups have initiated nationwide studies collecting BRCA1/2 mutational data. These national collaborative studies will help a comprehensive understanding of the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in the Asian population.

Cross-sectional analysis of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Japanese patients suspected to have hereditary breast/ovarian cancer

The prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in Japanese patients suspected to have hereditary breast/ovarian cancer was examined by a multi-institutional study, aiming at the clinical application of total sequencing analysis and validation of assay sensitivity in Japanese people using a cross-sectional approach based on genetic factors estimated from personal and family histories. One hundred and thirty-five subjects were referred to the genetic counseling clinics and enrolled in the study. Full sequencing analysis of the BRCA1/2 gene showed 28 types of deleterious mutations in 36 subjects (26.7%), including 13 types of BRCA1 mutations in 17 subjects (12.6%) and 15 types of BRCA2 mutations in 19 subjects (14.1%). Subjects were classified into five groups and 22 subgroups according to their personal and family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, and the prevalence of deleterious mutations was compared with previously reported data in non-Ashkenazi individuals. Statistical analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel test for groups I through IV revealed that the prevalence of Japanese subjects was significantly higher than that of non-Ashkenazi individuals (P = 0.005, odds ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.22-2.88). Family history of the probands suffering from breast cancer indicated risk factors for the presence of deleterious mutations of BRCA1/2 as follows: (1) families with breast cancer before age 40 within second degree relatives (P = 0.0265, odds ratio 2.833, 95% confidence interval 1.165-7.136) and (2) families with bilateral breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer within second degree relatives (P = 0.0151, odds ratio 2.88, 95% confidence interval 1.25-6.64).

Results of a population-based screening for hereditary breast cancer in a region of North-Central Italy: contribution of BRCA1/2 germ-line mutations

BRCA1/2 mutation status is of paramount importance to identify families at risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC). Most HBOC and BRCA1/2 mutation studies have focused on highly selected sub-populations, and few data are available for large population cohorts. For this reason, as part of a regional cancer prevention strategy in North-Central Italy, we set up a population-based screening programme to identify all resident HBOC families, and to determine their BRCA1/2 mutation status. To date, 44 different BRCA1/2 variants have been identified in 55 HBOC families. Of the seven newly reported mutations, only BRCA1 Q284X is clearly deleterious. The analysis of clinical disease characteristics in relation to age of disease onset and family history showed a difference between BRCA1/2 wild type and mutation carrier families. Interestingly, BRCA1/2 mutations were significantly more common in women who developed breast cancer <or=40 years of age than in BRCA1/2 wild type women (50% vs. 29%, respectively, P = 0.005). The family history selection criteria most likely to indicate the presence of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations are breast cancer <or=35 years (P = 0.012), two first-degree relatives with breast cancer <or=50 years (P = 0.022), and male breast cancer (P = 0.047). The penetrance of BRCA1/2 alterations in our cohort seems to be aligned with other published results. However, new data interpretations have emerged in relation to the clinical criteria and the presence of deleterious mutations. This information shows that a correct and accurate clinical selection could avoid unnecessary molecular tests and could better address genetic analysis and clinical management.

Genetic, functional, and histopathological evaluation of two C-terminal BRCA1 missense variants

BACKGROUND

The vast majority of BRCA1 missense sequence variants remain uncharacterized for their possible effect on protein expression and function, and therefore are unclassified in terms of their pathogenicity. BRCA1 plays diverse cellular roles and it is unlikely that any single functional assay will accurately reflect the total cellular implications of missense mutations in this gene.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the effect of two BRCA1 variants, 5236G>C (G1706A) and 5242C>A (A1708E) on BRCA1 function, and to survey the relative usefulness of several assays to direct the characterisation of other unclassified variants in BRCA genes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from a range of bioinformatic, genetic, and histopathological analyses, and in vitro functional assays indicated that the 1708E variant was associated with the disruption of different cellular functions of BRCA1. In transient transfection experiments in T47D and 293T cells, the 1708E product was mislocalised to the cytoplasm and induced centrosome amplification in 293T cells. The 1708E variant also failed to transactivate transcription of reporter constructs in mammalian transcriptional transactivation assays. In contrast, the 1706A variant displayed a phenotype comparable to wildtype BRCA1 in these assays. Consistent with functional data, tumours from 1708E carriers showed typical BRCA1 pathology, while tumour material from 1706A carriers displayed few histopathological features associated with BRCA1 related tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive range of genetic, bioinformatic, and functional analyses have been combined for the characterisation of BRCA1 unclassified sequence variants. Consistent with the functional analyses, the combined odds of causality calculated for the 1706A variant after multifactorial likelihood analysis (1:142) indicates a definitive classification of this variant as "benign". In contrast, functional assays of the 1708E variant indicate that it is pathogenic, possibly through subcellular mislocalisation. However, the combined odds of 262:1 in favour of causality of this variant does not meet the minimal ratio of 1000:1 for classification as pathogenic, and A1708E remains formally designated as unclassified. Our findings highlight the importance of comprehensive genetic information, together with detailed functional analysis for the definitive categorisation of unclassified sequence variants. This combination of analyses may have direct application to the characterisation of other unclassified variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2.