Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

Effect of Limb Dominance on Chronic Ankle Instability: Does It Matter?

Our study aimed to examine preoperative differences in strength and balance between dominant foot (DF) and nondominant foot (non-DF) of individuals undergoing ligament stabilization surgery in the general population. Patients with records of preoperative evaluation, including isokinetic dynamometric strength evaluation, Y-balance test (YBT), and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), were included in the study. The DF was the preferred leg for accurately kicking a ball through a goal. Statistical analysis determined the differences between DF and non-DF and the correlations between muscle strength, balance, and FAOS. There was no statistically significant difference between DF and non-DF regarding evertor and invertor muscle strength (p=0.082-0.951). The YBT revealed no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.082-0.951). There was a significant correlation between the evertor peak torque and total work deficits at 30°/s (p=0.022), as well as the evertor peak torque deficit at 120°/s (p=0.048). No significant differences in muscle strength and balance were found between DF and non-DF in nonathletes with chronic ankle instability. Peroneal muscle strength deficit was associated with functional impairment. Tailored interventions are needed to address limb dominance and muscle strength deficits in CAI management.

Assessing Functional Ankle Instability in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Functional Ankle Instability (FAI) is the subject of extensive research in sports and other environments. Given the importance of accurately measuring this latent construct, it is imperative to carry out a careful assessment of the available tools. In this context, the aim of this review was to take an in-depth look at the six most cited measurement tools to assess FAI, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcome measures related to ankle and foot. Four electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed, and SportDiscus) were searched (up to November 2022) to identify the six most cited questionnaires for assessing FAI. Our analysis showed that the most cited questionnaires are the following: the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Each questionnaire was thoroughly assessed and discussed in three sections: Development, Reliability, and Summaries. In addition, bibliometric data were calculated to analyze the relevance of each questionnaire. Despite variations in terms of validity and reliability, conceptualization, structure, and usefulness, the six questionnaires proved to be robust from a psychometric point of view, being widely supported in the literature. The bibliometric analyses suggested that the FAOS ranks first and the FFI ranks sixth in the weighted average of the impact factors of their original publications.

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Foot and Ankle Disability Index

The Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) is one of the most commonly used tools for evaluating foot and ankle function. Due to the lack of a Korean version for properly evaluating Koreans, it was not possible to compare Korean data with data from other countries using FADI. Therefore, we created a Korean version of the FADI questionnaire and evaluated its reliability and validity. We translated the English version of FADI and FADI-sport into Korean and then back into English. The Korean version of the FADI and FADI-sport, the previously verified visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the previously validated Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36) were administered to outpatients with chronic foot and ankle pain. A total of 64 patients who visited the outpatient clinic for chronic foot and ankle pain from January 2023 to March 2023 were included. To evaluate test-retest reliability and internal consistency, we used the intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. We also assessed the concurrent and construct validity of the Korean version of FADI and FADI-sport by comparing them with the VAS and SF-36. Cronbach's alpha values were 0.953 and 0.945 for the FADI and FADI-sport, respectively, indicating good internal consistency. The reproducibility was good, and a strong correlation was observed between FADI, VAS, and SF-36. Therefore, the validation of the Korean version of the FADI was successfully performed, and it is a reliable questionnaire for self-evaluation of a patient's foot and ankle condition.

Empfehlung für Fragebögen zur Untersuchung der Fuß- und Sprunggelenkfunktion vom Research-Komitee der AGA

Das standardisierte Erheben von Behandlungsergebnissen findet immer mehr Einzug in die moderne Medizin. Hierbei ist vor allem das subjektive Ergebnis aus Patientensicht und die damit häufig einhergehende Zufriedenheit mit der medizinischen Behandlung in den Fokus gerückt. Dies hat in den letzten Jahren nicht nur in der akademischen Landschaft, sondern auch auf gesundheitspolitischer Ebene deutlich an Bedeutung gewonnen. Dies bedeutet, dass das Behandlungsergebnis immer mehr Einfluss auf die Vergütung der Leistungserbringer erhält, auch „value-based healthcare“ genannt. Insbesondere in der Orthopädie und Traumatologie gibt es dabei zahlreiche gelenkspezifische Messinstrumente (Fragebögen, Scores oder „patient-reported outcome measures“ [PROMs]), wobei in der Fuß- und Sprunggelenkchirurgie hierfür eine Vielzahl an Fragebögen verfügbar ist, die sich jedoch häufig sehr heterogen und selten pathologiespezifisch darstellen. In Anbetracht der derzeitigen Mannigfaltigkeit an PROMs in der aktuellen Literatur ist es deshalb von Interesse, die wissenschaftliche Qualität zu prüfen und gleichzeitig die Forschungskommunikation zu vereinheitlichen, indem etablierte und gemäß akademischen Gütekriterien ausgewählte Fragebögen zum Einsatz kommen. Ziel ist es, valide, verlässliche und möglichst repräsentative Daten zu gewinnen, um eine akkurate Darstellung der tatsächlichen Ergebnisse zu erreichen. Dies bedingt neben qualitativen Kriterien auch immer kompakte und leicht verständliche Fragenkataloge, um so eine möglichst hohe Rücklaufquote zu generieren. Schließlich sollte auch immer eine Einschätzung der klinischen Relevanz der erhaltenen Ergebnisse stattfinden. Hierfür hat sich der kleinste vom Patienten als klinische Veränderung wahrgenommene Wert des jeweiligen PROM („minimal clinically important difference“, MCID) durchgesetzt. Für den Fuß- und Sprunggelenkbereich werden dabei vom Research Komitee der AGA unter Berücksichtigung dieser Kriterien folgende Messinstrumente empfohlen: FAOS (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score) zur Beurteilung der allgemeinen Schmerzsymptomatik und Funktion sowie der EQ-5D-Fragebogen zur Beurteilung der Lebensqualität. Zwar kann aufgrund fehlender Datenlage keine pathologiespezifische Empfehlung abgegeben werden, jedoch ist der FAOS für eine Vielzahl von Fuß- und Sprunggelenkpathologien validiert und liegt zudem in deutscher Sprache vor.

Anatomic anterior talofibular ligament repair augmented with suture-tape for chronic ankle instability with poor quality of remnant ligamentous tissue

PURPOSE

Because modified Broström procedure provides a restoration of mechanical stability by reinforcing attenuated host tissue, poor quality of remnant ligamentous tissue is considered as a prognostic factor for ligament repair surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the intermediate-term clinical results after anatomic anterior talofibular ligament repair augmented with suture-tape for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) with poor quality of ligament remnants.

METHODS

64 patients with the insufficient anterior talofibular ligament confirmed by preoperative magnetic resonance image and intraoperative inspection were followed for ≥3 years after the augmented anterior talofibular ligament repair. The clinical outcomes were assessed with the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. Measurements on stress radiographs were performed to assess the changes of mechanical instability. To identify the changes of functional ankle instability, postural control ability was analysed with single leg stance test.

RESULT

Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure scores improved from preoperative mean 58.3 and 53.6 points to 90.2 and 88.7 points at final followup, respectively (p < 0.001). Talar tilt angle and anterior talar translation improved from preoperative mean 16.5° and 13.4 mm to 3.2° and 4.4 mm at final followup, respectively (p < .001). Two patients (3.1%) showed a recurrence of instability. Although balance retention time improved from preoperative mean 3.9-6.2 seconds at final followup (p < .001), a significant side-to-side difference was found.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic anterior talofibular ligament repair augmented with suture-tape appears to be a useful surgical option for CLAI with poor quality of ligament remnants at intermediate-term followup. Through anatomic repair of attenuated ligaments and suture-tape augmentation, this combined procedure can provide the reliable restoration of mechanical stability and advantages of the anatomic ligament repair. Postural control deficit compared to the uninjured ankle supports a necessity of continuous proprioceptive-oriented rehabilitation.

Clinical Features and Treatment of Intra-Tendinous Suture Reaction Following Achilles Tendon Repair Using Nonabsorbable Suture Material: A Retrospective Case Series Study

We aimed to investigate the clinical manifestations, radiological findings, and therapeutic outcome of treatment for patients with surgically confirmed foreign body reaction following an Achilles tendon repair using non-absorbable suture material. Eight consecutive patients who were confirmed as having an intra-tendinous suture foreign body reaction in the histopathological report were enrolled in this study. Medical records of all patients in terms of clinical and radiological features were retrieved. Also, the outcome of treatment was evaluated at a follow-up of at least 12 months. All the patients complained of pain and a palpable mass around a previous surgical site at mean 25.1 months (range, 4-72 months) after the initial surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound were used to detect the lesion. All the patients underwent surgical excision of foreign body reaction tissue and primary repair using absorbable suture material. After the treatment, the wounds were healed completely in all, and the average FAOS (foot and ankle outcome score) was 91.32 at mean follow-up for 22.4 months. In conclusion, intra-tendinous suture reaction is a rare complication following an Achilles tendon repair using nonabsorbable suture material, but it can be treated adequately with only surgical excision of foreign body reaction tissue and primary repair using absorbable suture material.

Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis and Management of Synovial Fistula Associated Lateral Ankle Sprain or Instability: A Retrospective Study of 19 Surgically Confirmed Patients

We aimed to investigate the preoperative history, clinical manifestations, imaging findings, and postoperative clinical outcomes for patients with surgically confirmed synovial fistula around the ankle joint. 19 consecutive patients who were confirmed to have synovial fistula in the surgical field were enrolled in this study. Medical records of all patients in terms of preoperative details, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes at 1 year after the surgery were retrieved. As a diagnostic modality, the normal saline test or MRI was used. Intraoperatively, the synovial fistula was repaired with the capsuloligamentous repair or additional periosteal augmentation. All patients had a history of ankle sprain prior to symptoms and showed positive results in the saline load test. One patient had recurred symptom after the surgery, so needed a revisional periosteal augmentation. At 1 year follow-up period, the average Foot ankle outcome score was 87.65 and no surgery-related complication was detected. Synovial fistula of the ankle joint needs to be taken into consideration as a possible complication in patients with ankle sprain history and recurrent joint swelling. The saline load test would be useful for its diagnosis, and treatment should be focused on the complete closure of capsular opening along with restoration of its surrounding pathologic conditions.

Structural validity of the foot and ankle outcome score for orthopaedic pathologies with Rasch Measurement Theory

BACKGROUND

The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is one of the most frequently used patient-reported outcome measures for foot and ankle conditions. The aim is to test the structural validity of the Finnish version of the FAOS using Rasch Measurement Theory.

METHODS

FAOS scores were obtained from 218 consecutive patients who received operative treatment for foot and ankle conditions. The FAOS data were fitted into the Rasch model and person separation index (PSI) calculated.

RESULTS

All the five subscales provided good coverage and targeting. Three subscales presented unidimensional structure. Thirty-eight of the 42 items had ordered response category thresholds. Three of the 42 items had differential item functioning towards gender. All subscales showed sufficient fit to the Rasch model. PSI ranged from 0.73 to 0.94 for the subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

The Finnish version of the FAOS shows acceptable structural validity for assessing complaints in orthopaedic foot and ankle patients.

Age, Body Mass Index, and Spur Size Associated with Patients’ Symptoms in Plantar Fasciitis

Background

Plantar fasciitis is a common cause of heel pain affecting 10% of the general population. This study aimed to investigate the specific symptoms in patients with plantar fasciitis using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) questionnaire and their relationship with demographic and radiographic factors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 73 consecutive patients (mean age, 53.8 ± 10.0 years; 20 men and 53 women) with plantar fasciitis who had visited our foot and ankle clinic and undergone weight-bearing foot X-ray examinations. Their demographic data, anteroposterior and lateral talo-first metatarsal angles, intermetatarsal and hallux valgus angles, and responses to the FAOS questionnaire were recorded.

Results

The quality-of-life subscale showed the lowest score of all FAOS subscales. Age was significantly correlated with quality of life (r = 0.297, p = 0.011), and body mass index was correlated with the function in sports and recreational activities (r = –0.251, p = 0.032). Age and body mass index were statistically significantly correlated with calcaneal spur size (r = 0.274, p = 0.027 and r = 0.324, p = 0.008, respectively). The calcaneal spur size was significantly correlated with pain (r = –0.348, p = 0.004), function in daily living (r = –0.410, p = 0.001), and function in sports and recreational activities (r = –0.439, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Demographic factors were associated with specific symptoms in patients with plantar fasciitis. Calcaneal spur size was the only radiographic parameter correlated with symptoms. These findings help communicate with patients, set appropriate treatment goals, and evaluate treatment effectiveness.

Minimal important change for Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

BACKGROUND

Although Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for foot and ankle conditions, research on its longitudinal validity is still needed. Minimal important change (MIC) values for the FAOS were determined using predictive modeling.

METHODS

Overall, 134 patients that underwent operative treatment for foot and ankle conditions were included. An anchor based predictive logistic modeling method was used for estimating the MIC values for the FAOS subscales after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean score changes in the improved and the unimproved groups were 17.7 and 0.43 points for Pain, 3.9 and -3.3 points for Symptoms, 21.3 and 1.8 points for Activities and daily living (ADL), 8.7 and -2.8 points for Sport, and 12.5 and -3.3 points for quality of life subscale, respectively. MIC was successfully determined to four out of five subgroups as follows: Pain 9.5 (94% CI -6.4 to 24.6); ADL 11.7 (95% CI -19.6 to 46.6); Sport (95% CI -10.4 to 15.4); QoL 5.0 (95% CI -2.6 to 12.9). The Symptoms subgroup presented with low MIC of 0.3 (95% CI -11.7 to 13.4) fitting to the measurement error.

CONCLUSION

ADL, Sports, Pain, and QoL subscales of the FAOS presented logical MIC values. The MIC can be further evaluated for specific conditions.

Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean translation of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score

Background

The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure to assess clinical outcomes of Achilles tendon rupture, but it has not been validated in Korean yet. The purpose of this study was to translate the ATRS into Korean and evaluate its reliability and validity in a Korean population.

Methods

The ATRS was translated into Korean according to recommended guidelines for forward-backward translation. Thirty-eight patients who underwent surgical treatment for Achilles tendon rupture from 2017 to 2019 were enrolled. Reliability was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Construct validity was assessed with Spearman rank correlations with the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain in daily activity.

Results

The Korean translation of the ATRS had excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.84) and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.84). The SEM was 6.61, and the MDC was 18.32 at the individual level and 2.97 at the group level. The Korean translation of the ATRS was strongly correlated with the FASO (r = 0.88). Correlation with the NRS in daily activity (r = − 0.66) was moderate.

Conclusion

The Korean translation of the ATRS showed sufficient reliability and validity for use in the Korean population.

Level of evidence

II.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04765-w.

Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Are Clinical Outcomes Maintained 10 Years Later?

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation (BMS) is considered the first-line treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). However, the long-term stability of the clinical success of BMS remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term clinical outcomes among patients who underwent BMS for OLT and to identify prognostic factors for the need for revision surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 202 ankles (189 patients) that were treated with BMS for OLT and had a minimum follow-up of 10 years. The visual analog scale for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score, and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were assessed by repeated measures analysis of variance. Prognostic factors associated with revision surgery were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard regression models and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

The mean lesion size was 105.32 mm² (range, 19.75-322.79); 42 ankles (20.8%) had large lesions (≥150 mm²). The mean visual analog scale for pain improved from 7.11 ± 1.73 (mean ± SD) preoperatively to 1.44 ± 1.52, 1.46 ± 1.57, and 1.99 ± 1.67 at 1, 3 to 6, and ≥10 years, respectively, after BMS (P < .001). The mean ankle-hindfoot score also improved, from 58.22 ± 13.57 preoperatively to 86.88 ± 10.61, 86.17 ± 10.23, and 82.76 ± 11.65 at 1, 3 to 6, and ≥10 years after BMS (P < .001). The FAOS at the final follow-up was 82.97 ± 13.95 for pain, 81.81 ± 14.64 for symptoms, 83.49 ± 11.04 for activities of daily living, 79.34 ± 11.61 for sports, and 78.71 ± 12.42 for quality of life. Twelve ankles underwent revision surgery after a mean 53.5 months. Significant prognostic factors associated with revision surgery were the size of the lesion (preoperative magnetic resonance imaging measurement ≥150 mm²; P = .014) and obesity (body mass index ≥25; P = .009).

CONCLUSION

BMS for OLT yields satisfactory clinical outcomes at a mean follow-up of 13.9 years. The success of the surgery may depend on the lesion size and body mass index of the patient.

Efficacy of Lesion Specific Portals in Endoscopic Treatment of Calcaneal Bone Cyst: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background: Calcaneal bone cysts rarely occur and most of them are known to be benign. Among them, simple bone cysts (SBCs) third most commonly occur in the calcaneus and of the many surgical treatment options, endoscopic curettage is recently gaining popularity among surgeons due to its advantages of minimal invasiveness and optimal visualization. As for portal placement for endoscopy, two lateral portals are considered a standard technique, but no rationale has been established for SBCs with abnormal geometry. This case report suggests an SBC with secondary aneurysmal change located outside the Ward’s triangle, as well as an appropriate endoscopic approach. Case Presentation: An 18-year-old male high school student presented with a main complaint of pain at the hind foot level for the past one year, without significant improvement from conservative treatment. An endoscopic curettage through the lesion specific two posterior portals and bone graft using allogeneic cancellous bone were performed. SBC with a secondary aneurysmal bone cyst was diagnosed on pathology. At a one-year follow-up, the patient was painless and had returned to his regular activities. Physical and radiographic examinations revealed that the lesion was completely healed without any evidence of recurrence. Conclusion: For calcaneal bone cysts located at the posterior aspect of the calcaneus, eccentrically medial and abnormally long anterior-posteriorly, we suggest an endoscopic procedure using lesion specific portals such as two posterior portals.

Validation of Remote Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Patients' Smartphones

Backgroud

The purpose of this study was to examine the between-mode equivalence and the relative efficiency of the 2 available modes of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection: a web-enabled touch screen tablet and a smartphone in a sample of patients who underwent foot and ankle orthopedic surgery.

Methods

A total of 136 patients who visited the clinic after foot/ankle surgery participated in the study. All patients completed the PRO questionnaire set using tablets at the hospital. After 24 hours of completing the first PRO questionnaire, the patients completed the same PRO questionnaire at home using their personal smartphones. The outcomes were statistically compared, and the patients' preferences were surveyed.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficients for comparing the results of PRO measurements between the 2 modes were 0.970 for the visual analog scale, 0.952 for the Foot Function Index, 0.959 for the foot and ankle outcome scale, and 0.957 for the patient's satisfaction. Sixty-eight participants (58.6%) responded that they were able to answer the questionnaires with more honesty at home using their smartphones. Regarding the mode, 60 participants (48.1%) responded that they have no preference between the devices.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed the equivalence of the 2 modes of PRO data collection: web-enabled touch screen tablets and smartphones. Smartphones may be the preferred mode of PRO measurement, due to their easy accessibility, increased privacy, and the patients' increased honesty in answering questionnaires.

Intra-articular Injections of Hyaluronic Acid on Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus After Failed Arthroscopic Bone Marrow Stimulation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to compare clinical and functional outcomes before and after hyaluronic acid (HA) injections in patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus who experienced a failure of their primary treatment with arthroscopic microfracture surgery.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients were included in the final study. These patients had received microfracture surgery but continued to experience postoperative pain over an average of 13.0 months (range, 0-81 months) and were available for investigation with a mean follow-up for 29.1 months (SD 14.7; range 2.6-79.6 months). All patients received intra-articular injections of HA once per week for 3 weeks. We assessed clinical and functional outcomes before and after injection using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the Alexander subjective scale.

RESULTS

The AOFAS score significantly increased from 50.7 ± 13.8 to 79.9 ± 13.8 and the FAOS scores for symptom, pain, daily living, and sports were significantly higher postinjection compared to preinjection (all P < .001). Similarly, the mean VAS for pain was significantly decreased after 6 weeks following injection and continued to decrease over the follow-up period; the mean VAS was significantly lower postinjection compared to preinjection at 12 months (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular HA injections on average significantly improved clinical and functional scores after failed primary operative treatment. HA injections may provide an alternative to secondary operative treatment and provide better clinical outcomes than other conservative treatments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective observational cohort study.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) into Spanish (Chile)

PURPOSE

To adapt and validate the English version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) into Spanish FAOS-CL, following the WHO guidelines.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study including 318 outpatients with non-traumatic conditions. Validity, acceptability and internal consistency including correlations with the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 are reported.

RESULTS

The preliminary version resulted from the forward and back-translation and a pilot administration. Validation response rate was 99.22%. Substantial ceiling effects were observed for Symptoms and ADL and floor effect for QoL sub-scales. The FAOS-CL had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.98). The principal component analysis gave five factors explaining the 72.6% of the variance. The FAOS-CL items significantly correlate with their sub-scales. FAOS-CL sub-scales significantly correlated with SF-36 components and subcomponents.

CONCLUSION

The first Spanish version of the FAOS was generated. Culturally adapted and validated with high reliability capable of evaluating different foot and ankle conditions.

Tarsal tunnel syndrome secondary to osteochondroma of the calcaneus: a case report

Background

Tarsal tunnel syndrome is an entrapment neuropathy that can be provoked by either intrinsic or extrinsic factors that compresses the posterior tibial nerve beneath the flexor retinaculum. Osteochondroma, the most common benign bone tumor, seldom occur in foot or ankle. This is a rare case of tarsal tunnel syndrome secondary to osteochondroma of the sustentaculum tali successfully treated with open surgical excision.

Case presentation

A 15-year-old male presented with the main complaint of burning pain and paresthesia on the medial plantar aspect of the forefoot to the middle foot region. Hard mass-like lesion was palpated on the posteroinferior aspect of the medial malleolus. On the radiological examination, 2.5 × 1 cm sized bony protuberance was found below the sustentaculum tali. Surgical decompression of the posterior tibial nerve was performed by complete excision of the bony mass connected to the sustentaculum tali. The excised mass was diagnosed to be osteochondroma on the histologic examination. After surgery, the pain was relieved immediately and hypoesthesia disappeared 3 months postoperatively. Physical examination and radiographic examination at 2-year follow up revealed that tarsal tunnel was completely decompressed without any evidence of complication or recurrence.

Conclusions

As for tarsal tunnel syndrome secondary to the identifiable space occupying structure with a distinct neurologic symptom, we suggest complete surgical excision of the causative structure in an effort to effectively relieve symptoms and prevent recurrence.

Cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of the Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire

The Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire (FAOS-S) may be considered a health evaluation tool with 42 questions for assessing foot health disorders. To date, FAOS has been validated in different languages, but a Spanish version was lacking. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to translate and validate the Spanish version of the FAOS (FAOS es). A suitable method was developed for the translation protocol and cross-cultural validation from Swedish to Spanish. Regarding the total marks from each domain, agreement degrees and confidence were analysed using the Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. In addition, the mean ± SD differences between pretest and posttests were calculated and completed using of the Bland and Altman distribution plots. Excellent agreement between the two versions based on Cronbach's α was demonstrated. Five domains consisting of pain, symptoms of foot disorders, activities of daily living, sports and recreation, and foot and ankle quality of life were added together to obtain the total score. Excellent retest reliability was shown for the total score. Test/retest reliability was excellent for the pain, stiffness, other foot disorder-related symptoms, and quality of life domains. There were no significant differences among any domain (P > .05). There were no statistically significant differences (P = .000) for the mean ± SD differences between pretest and posttests (56.2524 ± 19.064 [51.98-60.52] and 57.45 ± 21.02 [52.74-62.16] points, respectively). Bland and Altman plots or clinically pertinent variations were not statistically significantly different. The FAOS is considered a strong and valid questionnaire with adequate repeatability in the Spanish community.

Comparison between an electronic version of the foot and ankle outcome score and the standard paper version: A randomized multicenter study

To prove the equivalence of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) in the printed (PFAOS) vs the electronic (EFAOS) form in a multicenter randomized study.Overall, 227 patients with ages ranging from 20 to 79 years from 16 dedicated foot and ankle centers were included. Patients were randomized into either a 'paper first' group (P-F group, n = 113) or an 'electronic device (tablet computer) first' group (E-F group, n = 114). The first evaluation either by paper (P-F group) or tablet (E-F group) was followed by a second evaluation the following day. The difference between the PFAOS and EFAOS results in each group was calculated and analyzed. To evaluate the benefit of each methodology, the time consumed per evaluation was compared and patients were asked which methodology they preferred and which was the easiest to use.There were no significant differences in age or sex between the groups. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value of 0.934 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.912-0.950, P < .001) was confirmed in PFAOS and EFAOS, showing a significant correlation between the 2 methodologies. EFAOS was completed in a shorter amount of time than PFAOS. The majority of patients agreed that EFAOS was easier to complete than PFAOS.The paper or electronic forms of the Korean adaptation of FAOS were considered equivalent. The shorter time of completion and the preference for the electronic version over paper by patients deems the electronic FAOS a promising option to consider in future.

Systematic review of the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for rheumatoid arthritis in the foot and ankle

OBJECTIVE

To identify self-reported outcome measures specific to the foot and ankle in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and to investigate the methodological quality and psychometric properties of these measures.

METHOD

A systematic review focusing on patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

SETTING

The search was conducted in the PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, PEDro and Google Scholar databases, based on the following inclusion criteria: population (with rheumatoid arthritis) > 18 years; psychometric or clinimetric validation studies of patient-reported outcomes specific to the foot and ankle, in different languages, with no time limit. Two of the present authors independently assessed the quality of the studies located and extracted the relevant data. Terwee's criteria and the COSMIN checklist were employed to ensure adequate methodological quality.

RESULTS

Of the initial 431 studies considered, 14 met the inclusion criteria, representing 7,793 patients (56.8 years). These instruments were grouped into three dimensions (pain, perceived health status and quality of life and disability). The time to complete any of the PROMs varies around 15 minutes. PROMs criterias with the worst scores by COSMIN, 92.85% and 85.71% were criterion validity, measurement error, internal consistency and responsiveness. 28.57% of PROMs were compared with the measurement properties.

CONCLUSION

the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score achieved the highest number of positive criteria (according to Terwee and COSMIN), and is currently the most appropriate for patients with Rheumatoid arthritis.

Short-Term Outcomes and Influencing Factors After Ankle Fracture Surgery

The present study investigated the factors influencing the early clinical outcomes after ankle fracture surgery. We included 88 patients, who had undergone implant removal surgery at 1 year after ankle fracture surgery, with ankle computed tomographic (CT) scans obtained before ankle fracture surgery and at implant removal available. We collected demographic information, including age, sex, the presence of diabetes mellitus, level of trauma energy, and fracture classification from the medical records. We also recorded the fracture height using the radiographs and CT images. The medial joint space and articular incongruity were assessed on the follow-up radiographs and CT scans. Bone attenuation was measured by placing a circular region of interest around the ankle joint on the preoperative CT image. The postimplant removal outcomes were assessed using 2 functional questionnaires, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Significant factors related to the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale scores and FAOS were identified through univariate analysis using age, sex, radiographic measurements, and CT findings as explanatory variables, followed by multiple regression analysis. On multiple regression analysis, the total FAOS was independently related to the AO classification (p = .003) and Lauge-Hansen classification (p = .003). The total AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scale score was related to articular incongruity (p = .044). The early clinical outcomes after ankle fracture surgery were affected by involvement of the ankle joint fracture rather than the lateral malleolus fracture height. Female sex and the presence of postoperative articular incongruity correlated with inferior early clinical outcomes.

Measurement properties of the most commonly used Foot- and Ankle-Specific Questionnaires: the FFI, FAOS and FAAM. A systematic review

PURPOSE

In the foot and ankle literature, a wide range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is used, however, consensus as to which PROMs are preferred is lacking. Selection of a PROM is among other reasons, often based on measurement properties without considering the methodological quality of the studies that evaluate these measurement properties. The aim of current study was first to identify the most frequently used foot and ankle-specific PROMs in recent orthopaedic foot and ankle literature, and second to conduct a systematic review to synthesize and critically appraise the measurement properties of these PROMS.

METHODS

Six PubMed indexed journals focussing on foot and ankle research were screened to identify most commonly used foot and ankle-specific PROMs over a 2 year period (2015-2016). Subsequently, a systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus and Scopus to identify relevant studies on their measurement properties. Methodological quality assessment was performed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist, criteria for good measurement properties were applied, and a level of evidence was determined for the measurement properties of each domain of the questionnaires.

RESULTS

The three most frequently reported PROMs were the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and the Foot and Ankle Activity Measure (FAAM). Among 2046 unique citations, 50 studies were included evaluating these PROMs. Evidence to support the measurement properties of the FFI was mainly lacking due to poor methodological quality. More evidence was available for the measurement properties of the FAOS and the FAAM, but overall evidence supporting all measurement properties is not yet sufficient.

CONCLUSION

The best available evidence retrieved in this review showed that the FAOS and the FAAM are promising outcome measures for evaluation of patients with foot and ankle conditions, but their shortcomings should be taken into account when interpreting results in clinical setting or trials.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Reliability and validity analysis of the open-source Chinese Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)

AIM

Develop the first reliable and validated open-source outcome scoring system in the Chinese language for foot and ankle problems.

METHODS

Translation of the English FAOS into Chinese following regular protocols. First, two forward-translations were created separately, these were then combined into a preliminary version by an expert committee, and was subsequently back-translated into English. The process was repeated until the original and back translations were congruent. This version was then field tested on actual patients who provided feedback for modification. The final Chinese FAOS version was then tested for reliability and validity. Reliability analysis was performed on 20 subjects while validity analysis was performed on 50 subjects. Tools used to validate the Chinese FAOS were the SF36 and Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Internal consistency between the FAOS subgroups was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Spearman's correlation was calculated between each subgroup in the FAOS, SF36 and NRS.

RESULTS

The Chinese FAOS passed both reliability and validity testing; meaning it is reliable, internally consistent and correlates positively with the SF36 and the NRS.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese FAOS is a free, open-source scoring system that can be used to provide a relatively standardised outcome measure for foot and ankle studies.

Primary Versus Secondary Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation for the Treatment of Large Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have reported promising clinical results after osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) for the treatment of large osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). However, no study has yet compared clinical outcomes between primary and secondary OAT for large OLT.

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes among patients with large OLT who receive primary OAT versus those who receive secondary OAT after failure of marrow stimulation and to identify factors associated with clinical failure.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2014, 46 patients with large OLT (≥150 mm²) underwent OAT: 18 underwent OAT as initial surgical management (primary OAT group), and 28 patients underwent secondary OAT after failure of previous arthroscopic marrow stimulation (secondary OAT group). In both groups, OAT procedures included arthroscopic inspection and debridement of concomitant soft tissue injuries. Clinical outcomes were assessed using pain visual analog scale (VAS), the Roles and Maudsley score, Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), and revisional surgery rates. Factors associated with clinical failures were evaluated using bivariate and logistic regression analyses. Survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 6 years (range, 2-10.8 years). Mean lesion size was 194.9 mm² (range, 151.7-296.3 mm²). There were no significant differences between groups in patient demographics and preoperative findings. Postoperative pain VAS, Roles and Maudsley score, FAOS, and revisional surgery rates were not significantly different at last follow-up. Prior marrow stimulation was not significantly associated with clinical failure on bivariate analysis. Lesion size greater than 225 mm² on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was significantly associated with clinical failure. Survival probabilities from Kaplan-Meier plots were not significantly different between the primary and secondary OAT groups ( P = .947).

CONCLUSION

Clinical outcomes of patients with large OLT treated with secondary OAT after failed marrow stimulation were found to be comparable with those who were treated with primary OAT. These results may be helpful to orthopaedic surgeons deciding appropriate surgical options for patients with large OLT.

5-year results of the 1.5cm incision Achilles tendon repair

BACKGROUND

To study a hypothesis that the cost-effective 1.5cm medial incision Achilles tendon repair technique will provide good functional outcomes which are maintained for over 5 years.

METHOD

Prospective study of 12 consecutive cases with a minimal 5-year follow-up were recruited from April 2008 to November 2010. Cases whom were mentally incompetent or those which required concomitant procedures were excluded. Outcomes measures included the numeric pain rating scale, motor power strength, range of motion, functional scoring using the AOFAS hindfoot score and patient's self-assessment using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).

RESULT

No re-ruptures or sural nerve injured were identified after a minimal 5-year follow-up. Pain was minimal at 0.5/10, calf power was 5/5 and ankle range was good (plantarflexion: 38°/dorsiflexion: 21°). The AOFAS hindfoot score was 97.4 and all 5 sub-categories of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were good.

CONCLUSION

The 1.5cm medial incision repair of the Achilles tendon is an economically sound surgical technique, with minimal complications, which gives good medium length functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparison of Outcomes for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus With and Without Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability

BACKGROUND

Previous reports suggest that prolonged instability of the ankle may contribute to development of osteochondral lesions and eventually lead to osteoarthritis. However, no studies have directly compared osteochondral lesions in ankles with chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) to those without instability. This study was performed to determine characteristics and resulting clinical outcomes associated with osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) in patients with and without instability.

METHODS

Of 420 patients who underwent primary arthroscopic marrow stimulation for OLT, 74 patients were identified as having concomitant CLAI. After considering age, sex, body mass index, and initial trauma history for the propensity score (1:2 ratio), a total of 148 patients without CLAI were matched from the remainder of the cohort. Demographics and lesion characteristics were compared using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy. Clinical outcomes were compared using a visual analog scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle score, and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).

RESULTS

The OLT group with CLAI presented a significantly increased proportion of lateral-side OLT, large OLT (150 mm(2) or larger), and chondral lesions at the tip of the medial malleolus (P = .018, P = .024, and P < .001, respectively). VAS and AOFAS scores were comparable at the last follow-up. However, the OLT with CLAI group also exhibited a significantly increased proportion of failure (AOFAS score less than 80) and inferior outcomes in the FAOS for the sport and recreation subscale (P = .034 and P = .005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with osteochondral lesions in ankles without CLAI, osteochondral lesions in an unstable ankle had an increased proportion of larger lesions (150 mm(2) or larger) and additional chondral lesions at the tip of the medial malleolus and the tibia plafond. This group also displayed increased clinical failure (AOFAS score less than 80). Inferior performance in sport and recreational activities may be more likely in patients with both OLT and CLAI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Evaluation of the foot and ankle outcome score in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle

The foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) has been evaluated for many conditions of the foot and ankle. We evaluated its construct validity in 136 patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle, its content validity in 37 patients and its responsiveness in 39. Data were collected prospectively from the registry of patients at our institution.

All FAOS subscales were rated relevant by patients. The Pain, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life subscales showed good correlation with the Physical Component score of the Short-Form-12v2. All subscales except Symptoms were responsive to change after surgery.

We concluded that the FAOS is a weak instrument for evaluating osteoarthritis of the ankle. However, some of the FAOS subscales have relative strengths that allow for its limited use while we continue to seek other satisfactory outcome instruments.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:662–7.