Axial spondyloarthritis: the heart of the matter

Exploring the causality between ankylosing spondylitis and atrial fibrillation: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Objective: To study whether ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has a causal effect on the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as independent instrumental variables (IVs) from a GWAS study of AS. Summary data from a large-scale GWAS meta-analysis of AF was utilized as the outcome dataset. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) model was used for the primary analysis. Multiple sensitivity and heterogeneity tests were conducted to confirm the robustness of the results. Results: In total, 18 SNPs were identified as IVs for MR analysis. Five MR methods consistently found that ankylosing spondylitis was not causally associated with atrial fibrillation (IVW: OR = 0.983 (0.894, 1.080), p = 0.718; MR-Egger: OR = 1.190 (0.973, 1.456), p = 0.109; Simple mode: OR = 0.888 (0.718, 1.098), p = 0.287; Weighted mode: OR = 0.989 (0.854, 1.147), p = 0.890; Weight median: OR = 0.963 (0.852, 1.088), p = 0.545). Leave-one-out analysis supported the stability of MR results. Both the MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO method revealed the absence of horizontal pleiotropy. Conclusion: The two-sample MR analysis did not support a causal relationship between AS and the risk of AF.

Prevalence and Risk for Bundle Branch Block, Atrioventricular Block and Pacemaker Implantation in Spondyloarthritis. A Systematic Review of the Literature

Objective

To evaluate the evidence regarding the prevalence and risk of bundle branch block (BBB), atrioventricular block (AVB) and pacemaker implantation (PMI) in patients with spondyloarthritis compared to a control group without spondyloarthritis.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was performed using Pubmed (Medline), EMBASE (Elsevier) and Cochrane Library (Wiley) databases until December 2021. The prevalence and risk for AVB, BBB and PMI were analyzed. Cohort, case control and cross-sectional studies in patients ≥18 years meeting the classification criteria for spondyloarthritis were included. The Odds ratio (OR), risk ratio (RR), or Hazard ratio (HR) and prevalence difference were considered as outcomes. Data was synthesized in a previously defined extraction form which included a risk of bias assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Results

In total, eight out of 374 studies were included. None of the studies provided results regarding the risk of low grade AVB and BBB in SpA patients. Only indirect results comparing prevalences from low to medium quality studies were found. According to population based registries, the sex and age adjusted HR of AVB was 2.3 (95% CI 1.6–3.3) in ankylosing spondylitis, 2.9 (95% CI 1.8–4.7) in undifferentiated spondyloarthritis and 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 a 1.9) in psoriatic arthritis. The absolute risk for AVB was 0.4% (moderate to high; 95% CI 0.34%-0.69%) for AS, 0.33% (moderate to high; 95% CI 0.21%-0.53%) for uSpA and 0.34% (moderate to high; 95% CI 0.26%-0.45%) for PsA.The RR for PMI in AS patients was 1.3 (95% CI 1.16–1.46) for groups aged between 65 and 69 years, 1.33 (95% CI 1.22–1.44) for 70–75 years, 1.24 (95% CI 1.55–1.33) for 75–79 years and 1.11 (95% CI 1.06–1.17) for groups older than 80 years. The absolute risk for PMI in AS patients was 0.7% (moderate to high risk; 95% CI 0.6–0.8%) for groups aged between 65–69, 1.44% (high risk; 95% CI 1.33–1.6%) for 70–75 years, 2.09% (high risk; 95% CI 2.0–2.2%) for 75–79 years and 4.15% (high risk; 95% CI 4.0–4.3%) for groups older than 80 years

Conclusions

Very few cases of low grade AVB and BBB were observed in observational studies. No study evaluated association measures for low grade AVB and BBB but the differences of prevalence were similar in SpA and control groups even though studies lacked the power to detect statistical differences. According to population based registries there was an approximately two fold-increased risk of high grade AVB in SpA patients. RR for PMI was higher in younger age groups.

Increased risks of aortic regurgitation and atrial fibrillation in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis patients: a 10-year nationwide cohort study

Background:

To compare the incidences of aortic regurgitation, atrial fibrillation (AF), and atrioventricular (AV) block II–III between radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) patients and the general population (GP).

Methods:

National Health Insurance Services data were used. R-axSpA patients (N = 8877) and the age- and sex-matched GP (N = 26,631) were followed from August 2006 to December 2019. Incidence rates and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of aortic regurgitation, AF, and AV block II–III were compared between these groups. Ten-year incidence rates and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression analysis.

Results:

Incidence rates of aortic regurgitation, AV block II–III, and AF in the r-axSpA group were 0.42, 0.21, and 4.0 per 1000 person-years (PYs), respectively. In the r-axSpA group, the SIR for aortic regurgitation was highest among 40- to 49-year-old men (4.11). Incidence rates of aortic regurgitation and AF were higher in the r-axSpA group than in the GP group (0.42 versus 0.18 per 1000 PYs 4.00 versus 3.13 per 1000 PYs, both p < 0.001, respectively), whereas the difference was insignificant for AV block II–III (0.21 versus 0.14 per 1000 PYs, p = 0.222). In multivariate analysis, r-axSpA was associated with a higher hazard (risk) for the development of aortic regurgitation and AF [HR (95% confidence interval) = 2.55 (1.49–4.37) and 1.20 (1.04–1.39), respectively], but the difference was insignificant for AV block II–III [HR (95% confidence interval) = 1.17 (0.59–2.31)].

Conclusions:

Compared with the GP, r-axSpA patients are at increased risk of aortic regurgitation and AF, but not AV block II–III. These patients should be carefully monitored for occurrence of aortic regurgitation and AF.

Valve Abnormalities, Risk Factors for Heart Valve Disease and Valve Replacement Surgery in Spondyloarthritis. A Systematic Review of the Literature

Objective: Evaluate the evidence on the abnormalities of the aortic root and heart valves, risk and prognostic factors for heart valve disease and valve replacement surgery in spondyloarthritis.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed using Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases until July 2021. Prevalence, incidence, risk and prognostic factors for heart valve disease; dimension, morphology, and pathological abnormalities of the valves were analyzed. Patient characteristics (younger age, history of cardiac disease or longer disease duration) and period of realization were considered for the analysis. The SIGN Approach was used for rating the quality of the evidence of the studies.

Results: In total, 37 out of 555 studies were included. Overall, the level of evidence was low. The incidence of aortic insufficiency was 2.5–3.9‰. Hazard Ratio for aortic insufficiency was 1.8–2.0. Relative risk for aortic valve replacement surgery in ankylosing spondylitis patients was 1.22–1.46. Odds ratio for aortic insufficiency was 1.07 for age and 1.05 for disease duration. Mitral valve abnormalities described were mitral valve prolapse, calcification, and thickening. Aortic valve abnormalities described were calcification, thickening and an echocardiographic “subaortic bump.” Abnormalities of the aorta described were thickening of the wall and aortic root dilatation. The most common microscopic findings were scarring of the adventitia, lymphocytic infiltration, and intimal proliferation.

Conclusions: A higher prevalence and risk of aortic valve disease is observed in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Studies were heterogeneous and analysis was not adjusted by potential confounders. Most studies did not define accurate outcomes and may have detected small effects as being statistically significant.

Heart Involvement in a Moroccan Population with Spondyloarthritis: A Cross-sectional Study

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of cardiac manifestations and their predictive factors in Moroccan patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA).

Methods

We have conducted a cross-sectional study over four months at the Department of Rheumatology in Mohammed VI University Hospital of Oujda, Morocco. All SpA patients fulfilled the 2009 Assessment SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria. Every patient had a cardiac check up including clinical examination, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the associated factors with cardiac manifestations.

Results

We included 64 men and 30 women with a mean age of 37.32 ± 12.65 years old. The mean disease duration was 10.60 ± 7.61 years. Patients had a mean Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) CRP of 2.25 ± 1.38, a mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) of 2.88 ± 2.26 and a mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) of 33.52 ± 30.49. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) included dyslipidemia in 14.9%, hypertension in 9.6% and type 2 diabetes in 7.4% of the cases. Eight patients (8.5%) smoked and 3 patients (3.2%) used alcohol whereas 20 patients (21.3%) had a history of smoking and 5 patients (6.3%) a history of alcohol. Cardiac manifestations were found in 12 patients (13.3%): 3.3% had aortic regurgitation (AR), 1.1% had aortic dilatation, 1.1% had aortic valve thickening (AVT), 2.2% had mitral thickening, 1.1% had mitral regurgitation (MR), 1.1% had mitral stenosis (MS), 3.3 had pericarditis and 2.2% had complete right bundle branch block (RBBB). In multivariate analysis, cardiac involvement was significantly associated with extra-articular manifestations (OR = 6.05; 95% CI: 1.197-30.607, p = 0.029).

Conclusion

Based on these results, cardiac involvement was common and associated with the severity of the disease; hence, early detection of cardiac abnormalities and targeted treatment strategies of SpA and comorbidities are necessary to control the systemic inflammation and improve the excess of cardiovascular mortality in this group of patients.

Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Dose Reduction for Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

The present study was undertaken to investigate the effectiveness and safety of dose reduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapy in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) compared to usual care.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Medline, and trial registries. We screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias in duplicate. Data were pooled using random-effects models; subgroup analyses were performed for type of TNFi, prior TNFi exposure, and follow-up duration. Outcomes of interest were Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) response and remission criteria, disease activity, relapse, and safety.

RESULTS

We included 6 randomized trials with 747 participants (442 with ankylosing spondylitis and 305 with nonradiographic axial SpA). Compared to the standard dose, there were fewer events with the reduced dose for the ASAS criteria for 40% improvement (risk ratio [RR] 0.62 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.49, 0.78]) and for ASAS partial remission (RR 0.17 [95% CI 0.06, 0.46]). There was a mean increase in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score (mean difference [MD] 0.35 [95% CI 0.10, 0.60]) and no difference in C-reactive protein levels (MD 0.16 [95% CI -0.76, 1.07]) with the reduced dose. There were more disease flares/relapses (RR 1.73 [95% CI 1.32, 2.27]) with the reduced dose. There were no differences in infection rates (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.98 [95% CI 0.76, 1.25]) or injection/infusion reactions (IRR 0.71 [95% CI 0.42, 1.19]).

CONCLUSION

Patients with axial SpA may experience little to no clinical benefit from reduction of TNFi therapy. Maintaining the standard dose probably improves the sustained effect on disease activity and helps to prevent disease flare.

Sex and Cardiovascular Involvement in Inflammatory Joint Diseases

The term inflammatory joint disease (IJD) encompasses a group of chronic conditions with predominant joint involvement. They share an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) complications. However, the implication of the sex in the risk of CV disease in IJD has not been specifically addressed. The aim of this work is to assess the influence of sex on the clinical expression of CV manifestations associated to IJD. With this objective, an update of the current knowledge of the sex influence on CV disease in patients with IJD was conducted. A PubMed database search of the most relevant literature on this topic was performed mainly based on studies published in English over the last 10 years. Although most studies on IJD were not specifically designed to address sex differences regarding CV complications, it seems that men with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at higher risk of pericarditis, ischemic heart disease, heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF), and CV mortality than women with RA. In contrast, HF with preserved EF and diastolic dysfunction is more frequent in women with RA. Men with ankylosing spondylitis present more frequently disorders of the conduction system and aortic valvulopathy than women. A limited number of studies addressed CV differences according to sex in psoriatic arthritis. Although there are some differences according to sex in the clinical expression of CV complications in patients with IJD, much research is still needed to better identify the implication of sex in the risk of CV disease in these patients.

Pain and affective distress in arthritis: relationship to immunity and inflammation

INTRODUCTION

Most arthritides are associated with pain and psychological distress (clinically significant depression and anxiety). Pain and depression are mutually exacerbating; both may continue even when joint involvement appears well controlled. Area covered: There is strong evidence that arthritis-related stress impacts the central nervous system and, together with peripheral inflammatory changes, can cause central sensitization that can lead to chronic pain and worsening of affective distress. Cytokines and chemokines participate both in joint inflammation and in central sensitization. We review evidence of these relationships in five arthritides, namely rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, gout, and in osteoarthritis of the hips and knees. Central sensitization in these conditions results in long-lasting pain and psychological distress. Expert commentary: Chronic pain and depression are important but often neglected in the clinical assessment and treatment of arthritis. The potential role of biologic cytokines and Janus kinase inhibitors in dealing with these symptoms needs further study.

Mesenchymal TNFR2 promotes the development of polyarthritis and comorbid heart valve stenosis

Mesenchymal TNF signaling is etiopathogenic for inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis (SpA). The role of Tnfr1 in arthritis has been documented; however, Tnfr2 functions are unknown. Here, we investigate the mesenchymal-specific role of Tnfr2 in the TnfΔARE mouse model of SpA in arthritis and heart valve stenosis comorbidity by cell-specific, Col6a1-cre-driven gene targeting. We find that TNF/Tnfr2 signaling in resident synovial fibroblasts (SFs) and valvular interstitial cells (VICs) is detrimental for both pathologies, pointing to common cellular mechanisms. In contrast, systemic Tnfr2 provides protective signaling, since its complete deletion leads to severe deterioration of both pathologies. SFs and VICs lacking Tnfr2 fail to acquire pathogenic activated phenotypes and display increased expression of antiinflammatory cytokines associated with decreased Akt signaling. Comparative RNA sequencing experiments showed that the majority of the deregulated pathways in TnfΔARE mesenchymal-origin SFs and VICs, including proliferation, inflammation, migration, and disease-specific genes, are regulated by Tnfr2; thus, in its absence, they are maintained in a quiescent nonpathogenic state. Our data indicate a pleiotropy of Tnfr2 functions, with mesenchymal Tnfr2 driving cell activation and arthritis/valve stenosis pathogenesis only in the presence of systemic Tnfr2, whereas nonmesenchymal Tnfr2 overcomes this function, providing protective signals and, thus, containing both pathologies.

Vasculitis and inflammatory arthritis

Vasculitis has been described in most types of inflammatory arthritis. The best described and most widely recognised form is rheumatoid vasculitis. The incidence of systemic rheumatoid vasculitis has declined significantly following the general early use of methotrexate in the 1990s, and it is now a rare form of vasculitis. Treatment of rheumatoid vasculitis is conventionally with glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide, but there is an increasing role for rituximab similar to that in other types of vasculitis. Despite these developments the mortality of rheumatoid vasculitis remains high. Vasculitis in other types of inflammatory arthritis is less well described and the treatment remains empirical.