Ultrasound7 versus ultrasound12 in monitoring the response to infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Correlation of US-7 and US-9 Scores with Disease Activity Score using 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background

The attentive management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has attracted particular attention. The German 7-joint Ultrasound (US-7) is the first scoring system that combines bone erosions and soft tissue lesions in a single composite scoring system. This study aimed to assess the correlation between US-7 and Disease Activity Score Using 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) in clinically active RA patients. The efficacy of a novel ultrasound score-based system, the US-9 score (joints assessed with US-7 plus knees), was also compared with the standard US-7 score.

Methods

All the RA patients referred to the outpatient rheumatology clinic of Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran, during 2019-2020 were included. 28 joints were clinically examined to calculate DAS28. Nine joints were assessed comprising the German US-7 plus knees using grayscale ultrasonography (GSUS) and power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS). Retrieved data were analyzed by SPSS software, version 22. The Spearman Correlation test was used to find the correlation between DAS28 and ultrasonographic findings. The statistical significance level was set at P<0.05.

Results

This study was composed of thirty-five RA patients with a mean age of 49.1±12.0 years. US-7 synovitis scores in GSUS and PDUS were significantly correlated with DAS28 (P=0.02, r=0.38 and P=0.003, r=0.48, respectively). US-9 synovitis scores in GSUS and PDUS were also significantly correlated with DAS28 (P=0.003, r=0.49 and P=0.006, r=0.45, respectively). The synovitis score measured by GSUS was significantly correlated with the GSUS knee synovial score (P=0.01, r=0.42).

Conclusion

Ultrasound assessment of large joints such as knees can be an effective approach to determining RA severity. However, it can be proposed that adding more involved joints into the sonographic assessment does not necessarily provide a better clinical correlation.

The Clinical Utility of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for Disease Activity Evaluation and Therapeutic Response Prediction in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Narrative Review

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by persistent synovitis and joint/bone destruction. There is an unmet need to predict the therapeutic response to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and achieve a treat-to-target goal. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is widely used to identify structural change and assess therapeutic response in RA. This review aims to summarize the available evidence regarding the clinical application of MSUS in evaluating disease activity and predicting therapeutic responses to DMARDs. We searched the MEDLINE database using the PubMed interface and reviewed English-language literature from 2000 to 2022. This review focuses on the updated role of MSUS in assessing disease activity and predicting therapeutic responses to DMARDs in RA patients. MSUS is now widely applied to identify articular structural change and assess the disease activity of RA. Combined use of gray scale and power Doppler MSUS is also superior to clinical assessment and laboratory examination in evaluating disease activity of RA. With portable use, good viability, and high sensitivity to articular inflammation, MSUS would be useful in assessing therapeutic response to biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in RA patients. Given MSUS could also detect subclinical inflammation in a substantial proportion of RA patients with clinical remission, it is recommended to assess b/tsDMARDs-treated RA patients who have achieved low disease activity or remission. Although substantial literature data have revealed clinical utility of MSUS for monitoring disease activity and evaluating therapeutic response in RA patients, the evidence regarding its predictive value for the effectiveness of b/tsDMARDs is limited.

Correlation between ultrasonographic scores and American college of rheumatology recommended rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To validate and facilitate ultrasound examinations on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity measurements in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of ultrasound examinations on joints and its correlation with clinical RA disease activity was performed. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched for literatures published up to May 01st 2021. Bayesian random-effect NMA was conducted to pool the correlations of ultrasonographic assessment scores with composite RA disease activity measurements.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies evaluating twelve different existing ultrasonographic measurements on joints evaluation for RA disease activity scoring were included in this NMA. For comparisons with clinical disease activity index and simplified disease activity index, synovitis gray scale ultrasound 7 joints (GSUS7) demonstrated modest correlation of 0.30[- 0.74, 1.23] and 0.46[- 0.45, 1.15] respectively, followed by synovitis power Doppler ultrasound 7 joints (PDUS7) (0.25[- 0.57, 1.14], 0.31[- 0.46, 1.24]) and power Doppler ultrasound 12 joints (PDUS12) (0.23[- 1.36, 0.83], 0.25[- 1.18, 0.88]). As for disease activity score using 28 joint counts, PDUS12 showed the biggest correlation of 0.53[- 0.09, 1.11], followed by ultrasound 7 joints (US7) (0.50[0.06, 0.93]), PDUS7 (0.49[- 0.24, 1.12]), power Doppler ultrasound 6 joints (PDUS6) (0.42[- 0.29, 1.21]), synovitis PDUS7 (0.47[- 0.09, 1.27]) and synovitis GSUS7 (0.40[0.01, 0.86]).

CONCLUSION

Comparative validity was observed on fewer joints ultrasonic evaluation for RA disease activity measurements, such as synovitis GSUS7 and synovitis PDUS7. Ultrasonographic measurements can be complementary for clinical RA disease activity measures with clinical efficiency, and technical guidelines were in need for clinical routine practice.

Receiver operating characteristic analysis using a novel combined thermal and ultrasound imaging for assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis

We aim to determine whether combined thermal and ultrasound (CTUS) imaging can identify rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with at least moderate disease activity (DAS28 > 3.2). Temperature differences of maximum (T_max), average (T_avg) and minimum (T_min) temperatures from a control temperature at 22 joints (bilateral hands) were summed up to derive the respective MAX, AVG and MIN per patient. MAX (PD), AVG (PD) and MIN (PD) are CTUS results derived by multiplying MAX, AVG and MIN by a factor of 2 when a patient's total ultrasound power Doppler (PD) joint inflammation score > median score, which otherwise remained unchanged. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine whether CTUS imaging can identify patients with DAS28 > 3.2. In this cross-sectional study, 814 joints were imaged among 37 RA patients (mean disease duration, 31 months). CTUS (but not single modality) imaging parameters were all significantly greater comparing patients with DAS28 > 3.2 versus those with DAS28 ≤ 3.2 (all P < 0.01). Area under the ROC curves (AUCs) using cut-off levels of ≥ 94.5, ≥ 64.6 and ≥ 42.3 in identifying patients with DAS28 > 3.2 were 0.73 , 0.76 and 0.76 for MAX (PD), AVG (PD) and MIN (PD), respectively (with sensitivity ranging from 58 to 61% and specificity all 100%). The use of CTUS in detecting a greater severity of joint inflammation among patients with at least moderate disease activity (DAS28 > 3.2) appears promising and will require further validation in independent RA cohorts.

Structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis assessed by musculoskeletal ultrasound: A systematic literature review by the Structural Joint Damage Task Force of the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group

OBJECTIVES

To identify and synthesize the evidence for the use and measurement properties of musculoskeletal ultrasound in assessing structural joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A systematic literature search (SLR) of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was performed. Original articles were included published in English reporting on ultrasound of bone erosion, cartilage damage and the measurement properties of ultrasound according to the OMERACT filter 2.1.

RESULTS

Of the 1.495 identified articles 149 were included in the final review, most of which reported on cross-sectional studies and used the OMERACT definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. Among these, bone erosions were assessed in 139 (93.3%), cartilage damage in 24 (16.1%), enthesophytes in 8 (5.4%), osteophytes in 15 (10.1%) and malalignment and ankylosis in a single (0.9%) study, respectively. Most studies (126/149, 84.6%) assessed the joints of the hands. The overwhelming majority of studies (127/149, 85.2%) assessed structural joint damage bilaterally. Validity, reliability and responsiveness were assessed in 21 (14.1%), 34 (22.8%) and 17 (11.4%) studies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While the results of this SLR suggest that ultrasound is a sensitive, reliable and feasible tool to detect damage in RA, they also highlight the need for further research and validation. Findings of this SLR will inform the next steps of the OMERACT Ultrasound Working Group in developing an ultrasound score for assessing structural joint damage in patients with RA.

Validity of 7-Joint Versus Simplified 12-Joint Ultrasonography Scoring Systems in Assessment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Activity

INTRODUCTION

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography (US) is an objective tool for the evaluation of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. There is no consensus on the exact number of joints that should be examined. Examination of reduced joint count is more practical than the comprehensive one.

OBJECTIVES

This is a cross-sectional study investigated the validity of a 7-joint US score (US7) in assessment of joint inflammation in RA patients compared with a simplified 12-joint US score (US12) and correlated both to composite disease activity indices.

METHODS

The activity status of 50 RA patients was assessed clinically and ultrasonographically. The disease activity was calculated using 3 composite indices. Ultrasonography was performed by 1 blinded rheumatologist, using power Doppler (PD) and gray-scale (GS) US examination. The US7 and simplified US12 were performed as originally described. However, the GS synovitis and PD synovitis of US12 were computed in 2 separate scores instead of 1. Two sum US7 scores were added, sum (GS) US7 and sum (PD) US7 after summating synovitis and tenosynovitis scores. Ultrasonography interobserver/intraobserver reliability was evaluated on 40 stored images.

RESULTS

Correlation coefficient between the different ultrasonographic scores showed no difference. The GS scores showed no correlation with disease activity parameters; however, the PD scores did. The sum (PD) US7 was the only score that showed significant correlation with the 3 different composite disease indices.

CONCLUSIONS

All studied US scores proved valid in assessment of disease activity status in RA. This is in favor of using the less-time-consuming US7 scores. The strongest correlation found with sum (PD) US7 confirmed the importance of incorporating the tendon in the disease activity assessment.

Ultrasonographic criteria for the diagnosis of erosive rheumatoid arthritis using osteoarthritic patients as controls compared to validated radiographic criteria

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to compare characteristics of radiography (RX) and ultrasound (US) erosive lesions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) patients (prevalence, topography and severity), to determine thresholds for the diagnosis of erosive RA based on US and to evaluate the performance of US and RX to establish a diagnosis of erosive RA differentiated from hand OA.

METHODS

Patients fulfilling ACR 1987 and/or ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria for RA or ACR hand OA criteria were prospectively included. A modified Sharp erosion score was assessed by two blinded readers and one adjudicator for discordant cases (number of eroded joints ≤ three). Erosions in US were scored on six bilateral joints (MCP2-3, 5; MTP2-3, 5) with a four-grade scale to calculate total US score for erosions (USSe).

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were included: 122 RA (32 early RA < 2 years; 90 late RA ≥ 2 years); 46 OA patients. On RX: 42 RA patients (6 early; 36 late) and 5 OA patients were eroded according to EULAR 2013 definition criteria with sensitivity at 34.4% and specificity at 89.1%. On US, 95 RA patients (21 early; 74 late) and 12 OA patients were eroded. Considering at least two joint facets eroded or at least one joint facet eroded at grade 2 on US, sensitivities were good (68-72.1%) and specificities excellent (89.1-100%). Agreement between RX and US was excellent (90-92%). The positive and negative likehood ratios were respectively 3.16 and 0.73 for radiography and 6.64 and 0.31 for US (for two facets eroded).

CONCLUSION

USSe can differentiate RA from OA in erosive disease and detect two times more patients with erosive RA than RX with excellent specificity and agreement.

Ultrasound and its clinical use in rheumatoid arthritis: where do we stand?

High-resolution musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) has been increasingly employed in daily rheumatological practice and in clinical research. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), MSUS can be now considered a complement to physical examination. This method evaluates synovitis through gray-scale and power Doppler and it is also able to identify bone erosions. The utilization of MSUS as a marker of RA activity has received attention in recent literature. Current data account for good correlation of MSUS with classical measures of clinical activity; in some instances, MSUS appears to perform even better. Diagnosis of subclinical synovitis by MSUS might help the physician in RA management. With some variation, interobserver MSUS agreement seems excellent for erosion and good for synovitis. However, lack of MSUS score standardization is still an unmet need. In this review, we describe several MSUS scores, as well as their correlation with clinical RA activity and response to therapy. Finally, we look at the relationship of MSUS with synovial tissue inflammation and discuss future perspectives for a better interpretation and integration of this imaging method into clinical practice.