Different roles of TNF inhibitors in acute anterior uveitis associated with ankylosing spondylitis: state of the art

Dry eye disease and spondyloarthritis: expanding the spectrum of systemic inflammatory disorders associated with ocular surface disease. Data from the international AIDA Network Spondyloarthritis Registry

Objective

Dry eye disease (DED) is a condition associated with a myriad of systemic disorders. According to recent preliminary data, axial spondylarthritis (axial-SpA) could represent a new entity associated with DED. Therefore, this study aimed to assess DED in patients with axial SpA by performing quantitative and qualitative specific tests to investigate the potential association between DED and ocular surface damage in patients with axial-SpA and to identify potential variables associated with DED.

Methods

A total of 71 patients with axial-SpA who fulfilled the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria and 19 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. Both the patients and the controls underwent a complete ocular assessment aimed at evaluating the tear film and ocular surface, which included the Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT), fluorescein staining, and lissamine green staining. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was administered to all patients.

Results

DED symptoms were reported in 46 (64.8%) patients and three (15.8%) healthy controls (p = 0.0004). The odds ratio for receiving a diagnosis of axial-SpA based on the presence of dry-eye-related symptoms was 9.2 (95% C.I. 2.72-42.52, p = 0.001). The Schirmer test values of < 6 mm/5 min were observed in 31 (43.7%) patients with axial-SpA and two (10.5%) healthy controls (p = 0.013); a TBUT of <5 s was observed in 34 (47.9%) patients with axial-SpA and six (31.6%) healthy controls. The median OSDI score was found to be 22.9 (IQR = 29.35) among the patients with axial-SpA and 0.0 (IQR = 4.69) among the healthy controls (p = 0.009). The fluorescein and lissamine green staining of the ocular surface indicated a significantly higher Oxford Grading Scale in the patients with axial-SpA than in the healthy controls.

Conclusion

Patients with axial-SpA often complain of eye dryness, which may be quantified with the self-administered OSDI questionnaire and objectively assessed through the tests commonly used for the diagnosis of DED. Patients suspected of having axial-SpA should routinely be asked about dry eye symptoms and evaluated for potential corneal and conjunctival damage.

The management of axial spondyloarthritis with cutting-edge therapies: advancements and innovations

INTRODUCTION

Axial involvement in spondyloarthritis has significantly evolved from the original 1984 New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis, leading to an improved understanding of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) as a disease continuum encompassing non- radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA). A clear definition for early axSpA has been established, underscoring the need for early intervention with biological and targeted synthetic drugs to mitigate pain, reduce functional impairment, and prevent radiographic progression.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores therapeutic strategies in axSpA management, focusing on biological and targeted synthetic therapies and recent advancements. Biologics targeting TNFα or IL-17 and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are primary treatment options. These therapies significantly impact clinical outcomes, radiographic progression, and patient-reported functional improvement.

EXPERT OPINION

AxSpA treatment has evolved significantly, offering various therapeutic options. Biological DMARDs, particularly TNFα inhibitors, have transformed treatment, significantly enhancing patient outcomes. However, challenges persist for patients unresponsive or intolerant to existing therapies. Emerging therapeutic targets promise to address these challenges. Comprehensive management strategies and personalized approaches, considering extra-articular manifestations and individual patient factors, are crucial for achieving optimal outcomes in axSpA management.

Challenges for further successful development of tumor necrosis factor targeting therapies for uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Uveitis is a heterogeneous group of ocular conditions characterized by inflammation of the uveal tract and is one of the leading causes of vision impairment. In developed countries, noninfectious uveitis (NIU) represents most cases and is challenging to treat due to its severity, chronicity, and high recurrence rates. The advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) agents have dramatically improved outcomes and changed treatment paradigms in NIU.

AREAS COVERED

The index article summarizes the present experience of anti-TNF-α agents in NIU pharmacotherapy and highlights the barriers to further research and development of anti-TNF-α agents for uveitis. Common challenges faced in NIU clinical drugs trials, specific difficulties in anti-TNF-α drug development, and promising competitor drug candidates are discussed and evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-TNF-α agents have revolutionized NIU pharmacotherapy and greatly improved outcomes with good safety profiles. The great success of systemic infliximab and adalimumab in NIU treatment has resulted in little impetus for further development of this class of medication. Attempts have been made to deliver anti-TNF-α agents intravitreally but that has not been successful thus far. With expiring patents, competition from biosimilars and newer, novel molecules, it may not be viable to continue pursuing anti-TNF-α drug development.

Have Therapeutics Enhanced Our Knowledge of Axial Spondyloarthritis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

An overview of how the treatment landscape of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has shaped our understanding of the disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prior to the millennium, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the only treatment for axSpA, yet only 30% of patients responded and many developed side effects. In 2003, the first biological disease-modifying drug (bDMARD) was licensed for axSpA which substantially improved outcomes in comparison to NSAIDs. In 2022, there are now several bDMARDs for axSpA; however, they too are not universally efficacious in treating axial inflammation and may have deleterious effects on extramusculoskeletal manifestations. Nevertheless, successful or not, each bDMARD gives invaluable insight into axSpA immunobiology. This review discusses how much we have learned from the use of bDMARDs in axSpA, how this has redefined our understanding of the disease, and how we might use this knowledge to develop new and better treatments for axSpA in the future.

Microvascular changes in the recurrent cystoid macular edema secondary to posterior noninfectious uveitis on optical coherence tomography angiography

Background

Posterior uveitis represents the second most frequent type of uveitis (15–30% of all uveitis). Noninfectious posterior uveitis complicated with secondary cystoid macular edema (CME) affects the visual prognosis negatively. The objective of the current study is to detect possible microvascular changes causing relapsing uveitis-related CME using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Methods

This is an interventional, observational, retrospective study with 1 year follow-up. Patients with noninfectious, posterior uveitis-related CME undergoing dexamethasone (DEX) implant were evaluated. Following the DEX-implant were carried out control visits after 1 month, 2-months, 4-months, 6-months, and for up 1-year. A total of 76 eyes of 38 consecutive patients with noninfectious posterior uveitis were enrolled (consecutive sample). Complicated noninfectious posterior uveitis with secondary CME was diagnosed in 56 eyes of uveitis patients (73.7%) and reviewed.

Results

Our investigation showed (1) a reduction in superficial vessel plexus (SVP) measurements within 2-month (84%), reaching 96.4% for up 1-year, (2) an irregular profile of SVP in 69.6% of cases, persisting for up 1-year; relapsing uveitis-related CME eyes with irregular superficial foveal avascular zone (FAZ) profile were in 51%, while the SVP measurements reestablished in 100% of cases. Conversely, (3) the deep vascular plexus (DVP) parameters restored in a lower number of eyes within the 2-month (39.3%), remaining abnormal in 46.4% of cases for up 1-year; despite DVP restored in 53.6% of cases for up 1 year, (4) a capillary rarefaction ring around the FAZ appeared in 80.4% of cases; the relapsing uveitis-related CME eyes with abnormal DVP parameters were present in 41% of cases, of which 92.1% showed a rarefaction ring had abnormal DVP.

Conclusions

The use of OCTA enabled the evaluation in detail of retinal microvascular changes. We suggested that the possibility of the recurrence of the uveitis-related CME depends on the persistence of modifications of the superficial and deep layers. In this regard, we propose to implement the current imaging armamentarium with OCTA for the follow-up of patients with noninfectious uveitis-related CME.

Risk of Acute Anterior Uveitis in Ankylosing Spondylitis According to the Type of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitor and History of Uveitis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the risk of acute anterior uveitis (AAU) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) during treatment with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFis).

METHODS

This study was performed on AS patients using the Korean National Health Insurance claims database. We analyzed the first and total occurrence of AAU during the first 2 years of TNFis use according to the type of TNFis. Additionally, the occurrence of AAU was assessed in subgroups with or without prior AAU before TNFis initiation.

RESULTS

In total, 5938 AS patients initiated TNFis use between 2009 and 2017 and used them for more than 2 years. Among them, 1488 (25.1%) patients had a history of AAU before starting TNFis treatment. Compared to adalimumab, the use of etanercept (hazard ratio [HR] 1.77) increased the risk of AAU. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of AAU with etanercept was significantly higher than that of adalimumab (IRR 1.78). The IRR of AAU was also higher for etanercept than adalimumab use in patients with (IRR 1.86) and without (IRR 2.92) a history of AAU.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that compared to anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibodies, etanercept has a higher incidence of AAU regardless of a history of AAU.

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant for noninfectious uveitis in Chinese patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-I) in Non-Infectious Uveitis (NIU) in Chinese patients.

METHODS

Ninety-one eyes of 77 patients (56 men, 21 women) receiving 130 implant injections for NIU were included. Treatment indication, uveitis diagnosis, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), vitreous haze score, intraocular pressure, phakic status, number of injections, time to reinjection, and systemic treatments were collected at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 and 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

All patients were followed for at least 12 weeks and had a mean follow-up period of 5.1 months (range, 3-14 months) after the first implant. The main treatment indications were macular edema (ME), retinal vasculitis, retinal vasculitis with ME. Sixty-one eyes (67.03%) received only one injection, while 31 eyes (32.97%) received two or more. In eyes that received 2 injections, the mean time to the second injection was 3.83 months and in those that received 3 injections, the mean time to the third injection was 7.5 months. BCVA and CRT significantly improved at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment. When compared to baseline, the mean prednisone (or equivalent) dosage significantly decreased at 3- and 6-month follow-up evaluations after DEX implantation.14.29% of eyes developed a transient increase in intraocular pressure, and a cataract was removed from 1 phakic eye.

CONCLUSIONS

DEX implants, either alone or in combination with common adjunctive NIU treatments, is safe and effective in the treatment of NIU in Chinese patients.

TNF-α in Uveitis: From Bench to Clinic

Uveitis is an inflammation of the iris, ciliary body, vitreous, retina, or choroid, which has been shown to be the first manifestation of numerous systemic diseases. Studies about the immunopathogenesis and treatment of uveitis are helpful to comprehend systemic autoimmune diseases, and delay the progression of systemic autoimmune diseases, respectively. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), a pleiotropic cytokine, plays a pivotal role in intraocular inflammation based on experimental and clinical data. Evidence of the feasibility of using anti-TNF-α agents for uveitis management has increased. Although there are numerous studies on TNF-α in various autoimmune diseases, the pathological mechanism and research progress of TNF-α in uveitis have not been reviewed. Therefore, the objective of this review is to provide a background on the role of TNF-α in the immunopathogenesis of uveitis, as well as from bench to clinical research progress, to better guide TNF-α-based therapeutics for uveitis.

Predictors of extra-articular manifestations in axial spondyloarthritis and their influence on TNF-inhibitor prescribing patterns: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis

OBJECTIVES

Extra-articular manifestations (EAMs) are important systemic features of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), which may influence the choice of tumour necrosis factor-inhibitor (TNFi). We examined the cumulative incidence and predictors of EAMs and the influence of these on first TNFi choice in a 'real-world' cohort of patients with axSpA.

METHODS

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of 2420 patients with axSpA from 83 centres were collected by the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Lifestyle factors for EAMs (acute anterior uveitis (AAU), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), psoriasis) were compared with those without EAMs. Also, the association between pretreatment EAMs and choice of first TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab) was analysed.

RESULTS

AAU was directly associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.95, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.73) and inversely associated with ever-smoking (IRR=0.71, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.92). For both psoriasis and IBD, there was an inverse relationship with HLA-B27 (IRR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.79 and IRR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91, respectively). A diagnosis of either AAU (OR 3.79, 95% CI 2.11 to 6.80) or IBD (OR 5.50, 95% CI 2.09 to 14.46) was associated with preference for adalimumab versus others. In contrast, a diagnosis of either AAU (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.33) or IBD (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.57) was associated with less preference for etanercept over other TNFi.

CONCLUSION

The higher occurrence of AAU and lower occurrence of psoriasis and IBD in HLA-B27-positive patients with axSpA are consistent with current pathophysiology. Patients with previous AAU and IBD are more likely to be prescribed adalimumab and less likely to receive etanercept, consistent with the superior efficacy of monoclonal TNFi for these indications. Future work will determine whether EAMs influence TNFi survival, or effectiveness, and whether this varies between agents.

Prevalence of extra-articular manifestations in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of extra-articular manifestations-enthesitis, dactylitis, nail disease, uveitis and IBD-in PsA, and their impact on longitudinal disease outcomes.

METHODS

We searched Medline, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science using a predefined protocol in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies using imaging to define extra-articular manifestations (EAMs) were excluded. Where possible, we performed meta-analyses of prevalence estimates, reported as percentages (95% CI). Heterogeneity (I2 statistic) was examined according to study characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 65 studies amounting to a total of 163 299 PsA patients. Enthesitis was assessed in 29 studies with an average prevalence of 30% (95% CI: 24%, 38%). Dactylitis was reported in 35 studies with an average prevalence of 25% (95% CI: 20%, 31%). Nail disease was present in 60% (95% CI: 52%, 68%) across 26 studies, but definitions were often unclear. Uveitis (3.2%; 95% CI: 1.9%, 5.3%) and IBD (3.3%; 95% CI: 1.5%, 7.1%) were less common. Heterogeneity was high (>95%) in all meta-analyses, but could not be explained by study characteristics. No studies examined the impact of EAMs on longitudinal disease outcomes, except that dactylitis increases radiographic progression.

CONCLUSION

Enthesitis, dactylitis and nail disease are highly prevalent in PsA, but not uveitis and IBD. EAM patterns differ from axial SpA despite their shared disease mechanisms, which may help further understand differences between spondyloarthritides. More studies are needed on the impact of EAMs on disease outcomes such as response to treatment.

Cytokine Profiling in Aqueous Humor Samples From Patients With Non-Infectious Uveitis Associated With Systemic Inflammatory Diseases

Non-infectious uveitis are intraocular inflammatory conditions caused by dysregulated activation of the immune response without any detectable infectious agents. The aim of this study was to explore potential markers and therapeutic targets for two distinct types of non-infectious uveitis associated with Behçet's disease (BD) and Vogt Koyanagi Harada (VKH) disease. Concentrations of 27 cytokines were investigated in aqueous humor (AH) samples from patients with active uveitis vs. healthy controls (HC) (n = 10 patients with BD-associated uveitis; n = 10 patients with VKH-associated uveitis; n = 10 HC) using the Bio-Plex Pro^TM human cytokine group I panel. Additionally, leukocytes in AH samples were counted with hemocytometers and characterized by flow cytometry. Eleven cytokines were differentially expressed between patients with uveitis and HC with a median concentration greater than 10 pg/ml. IL-6, IP-10, G-CSF, and IFNγ showed higher concentrations in AH samples from both BD and VKH patients while IL-2, IL-8, IL-13, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-1ra showed statistically significant higher concentrations only in AH samples from BD patients. GM-CSF was the sole cytokine with an opposite profile showing decreased levels in AH samples from BD patients. IL-1ra and IL-6 were detected at higher frequencies in AH samples from BD and VKH patients compared with those from HC while IFNγ and TNFα were not detected in HC. The concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, G-CSF, IFNγ, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-1ra positively correlated with the concentrations of leukocytes in AH, suggesting that such cytokines can be produced by immune cells and/or attract and/or promote proliferation and survival of immune cells in these types of uveitis. The correlation matrix of cytokine concentrations in AH samples revealed that IFNγ, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-6, G-CSF highly correlated each other. The ratios of cytokine concentrations between AH and plasma intra-individuals showed that IL-2, IL-6, IP-10, GM-CSF were increased intraocularly. In conclusion, AH sampling followed by multiplex analysis of cytokines should be fostered in non-infectious uveitis to identify cytokines dysregulated intraocularly in each individual laying the groundwork for precision medicine.

Adalimumab effectively controls both anterior and posterior noninfectious uveitis associated with systemic inflammatory diseases: focus on Behçet's syndrome

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy of Adalimumab (ADA) in noninfectious anterior uveitis (AU) and posterior segment (PS) involvement, associated with different conditions, with a focus on Behçet's syndrome (BS).

METHODS

In this retrospective, multicenter post-hoc study, we evaluated the efficacy of ADA in terms of ocular control and relapses in 96 patients with AU and PS uveitis, either idiopathic (IU) or associated with BS or with other systemic disorders (OSD) (Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada, Inflammatory Bowel Disease), followed in three tertiary referral centers.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (45 AU; 51 PS uveitis) were included. Eleven had IU, 58 BS, and 27 OSD. All patients with AU achieved complete long-term ocular control. In PS uveitis, 89%, 67% and 100% of patients with BS, IU and OSD achieved ocular control at the last follow-up (> 12 months), respectively. The lowest ocular relapse rate occurred in patients with AU with BS (1/13) or IU (0/2). ADA accounted for long-term disease control, and no predictors of ocular control and relapse were identified; particularly, ocular relapses seemed not related to systemic ones. Macular edema resolved in 75% and 67% of PS uveitis with BS and IU, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ADA controls both anterior and posterior uveitis, with an efficacy similar in IU, BS and OSD patients. In BS, the efficacy of ADA seems to be independent of demographic and clinical characteristics, and ocular relapses mostly occurred independently from systemic ones. Based on our results, ADA may represent a valid alternative in anterior refractory uveitis.

[Pharmacological treatment strategies and surgical options for uveitis]

BACKGROUND

Modern treatment of uveitis aims at a complete control of inflammatory activity, preservation of visual function and the prevention of secondary organ damage as a consequence of the underlying inflammatory disease and its treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This article gives an update about the strategies of pharmacological and surgical options for uveitis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The outcomes reported here are based on a PubMed search using the terms <"uveitis" AND "therapy"> and <"uveitis" AND "surgery" OR "surgical treatment">. All prospective studies and case series with more than 20 cases as well as review articles from the last 5 years along with cited cross-references were evaluated.

RESULTS

Local and systemic corticosteroids form the foundation of treatment after exclusion of an infectious etiology. If uveitis activity is not controlled within 6 weeks or if the daily corticosteroid dosage is unacceptably high, a treatment escalation using immunomodulatory drugs is required. If a complete control of inflammatory activity is not achieved, in a third phase treatment is supplemented by antibody-based treatment or cytokines, so-called biologics, with the aim of complete long-term freedom from disease without local or systemic steroid treatment. This target is achieved in 65-80% and guarantees long-term functional stability and anatomical integrity. Early treatment escalation in cases of persisting or recurrent activity as a rule prevents new secondary organ damage. Surgical options are utilized for diagnostic purposes, the administration of intravitreal drugs and for treatment of secondary complications.

CONCLUSION

Just like the majority of immunological diseases, uveitis is a chronic disease requiring long-term and possibly lifelong treatment and remission (absence of inflammation without treatment) is achieved in only <20%. Surgical interventions can be performed with a good prognosis, if the optic nerve head and macula are not involved. They have a substantially lower complication rate when freedom from symptoms exists preoperatively for at least 3 months.

The Effect of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitors on Uveitis in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors (TNFis), which are the main treatment for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), have been reported not only to reduce the incidence of anterior uveitis (AU) but also to induce it, and these effects differ among the various types of TNFis in clinical use. The present study investigated the effect of TNFis on uveitis by analyzing the long-term clinical course of AU in AS patients treated with TNFi therapy.

METHODS

Patients treated with at least one TNFi between January 2007 and July 2017 were reviewed, and 54 patients with at least one episode of AU were included in this study. The TNFis included anti-TNF-α antibodies (adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab), and a soluble TNF receptor molecule (etanercept). The effect of prevention of AU, the likelihood of new-onset uveitis after the initiation of TNFi therapy, and the effects of drug switching and dose escalation were assessed.

RESULTS

The first uveitis flare was observed before TNFi therapy in 39 patients and after TNFi therapy in 15 patients. Anti-TNF-α antibodies were more efficacious in decreasing the recurrence of AU than etanercept. Among patients in which uveitis first occurred after beginning TNFi therapy, patients on etanercept tended to first develop AU less than 1 year after starting the drug, and their AS tended to be well-controlled at the time of uveitis flares. Patients with a uveitis flare before their medication was switched did not recur afterwards, and five of eight patients showed no relapse after dose escalation.

CONCLUSION

TNFis have various effects on AU. TNFis, particularly anti-TNF-α antibodies, should be considered in patients with AS and frequent AU relapse. Additionally, clinicians should consider whether AU is due to an absence of a therapeutic response of AS to TNFi treatment or to TNFi treatment itself, and appropriate treatment changes should be made accordingly.

Useful message in choosing optimal biological agents for patients with autoimmune arthritis

The introduction of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatments for various types of autoimmune arthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthropathy and ankylosing spondylitis, represents a new era of treatment for patients with a refractory response to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). Many new bDMARDs with different modalities or that target different pro-inflammatory molecules, likely cytokines, are rapidly emerging. Hence, physicians in the field may be confused about choosing appropriate bDMARDs for their patients. Considering the high cost of bDMARDs and the rapid destructive process of autoimmune arthritis in patients, the choice of optimal bDMARDs for patients who fail to respond or show an inadequate therapeutic response to csDMARDs designed to control the disease is very critical. Here, we summarize the strengths and weaknesses of bDMARDs and specifically focus on their uses in patients with comorbid conditions or with specific medical conditions, such as pregnancy. This commentary provides a solid up-to-date review on commercially available bDMARDs and very useful information for physicians to facilitate the choice of more appropriate bDMARDs to treat patients with autoimmune arthritis and for basic researchers to understand the current strategies of bDMARD usage and hopefully to develop more powerful bDMARDs with fewer safety concerns.

Preventive effect of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors versus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on uveitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

To compare the preventive effect of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (anti-TNF antibody and soluble TNF receptor fusion protein (TNFR)) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on uveitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). This retrospective cohort study included all AS patients (n = 1055) who have been treated with either TNF inhibitor or NSAIDs at the Seoul National University Hospital from 2004 to 2016. Treatment episodes of each patient were assigned to anti-TNF antibody (n = 517), TNFR (n = 341), and NSAID (n = 704) groups. The incidence of uveitis in each group was compared using a Cox proportional hazard model. The incidence rates of uveitis before and after initiation of TNF inhibitors were also assessed. A propensity score-matched (PSM) comparison was performed for a sensitivity analysis. Uveitis was significantly less common in the anti-TNF antibody group than the NSAID group (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.96) while it was higher in the TNFR group (adjusted HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.43-3.53). Anti-TNF antibody further reduced the incidence of uveitis when prescribed with NSAIDs (combination therapy) (adjusted HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19-0.79). Combination therapy was preventive in AS patients with a history of uveitis (adjusted HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.12-0.81), but not in those without history of uveitis. The incidence rate of uveitis fell from 6.36 to 2.60 per 100 person-years when anti-TNF antibody was added to NSAIDs. Anti-TNF antibody plus NSAIDs reduces the risk of uveitis to a greater extent than NSAIDs alone in AS patients with a history of uveitis. Combination therapy may be an effective secondary prevention measure.

[Uveitis treated with biotherapy and/or DMARD: Analysis from the French Pharmacovigilance Study Base]

PURPOSE

To report the characteristics of uveitis cases occurring while on biologic therapy or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) reported to the French national pharmacovigilance database.

METHODS

All the uveitis cases occurring in patients with chronic rheumatologic diseases, chronic inflammatory intestinal diseases or connective tissue diseases, while treated with DMARDs and/or biologic therapies between 2000 and 2015 and reported to the French National Pharmacovigilance Database were collected.

RESULTS

During the study period, 32 cases of uveitis were reported (15 men, 17 women). Two patients were treated with one DMARD alone, 24 with biologic therapy alone, and six with both treatments. Anterior uveitis was diagnosed in 19 patients (8 cases were bilateral); intermediate uveitis was found (unilaterally) in one patient; posterior and diffuse uveitis occurred in 5 and 2 cases respectively. Five cases were inconclusive with regard to the anatomical type of uveitis. The uveitis was of infectious origin in 5 cases: 2 toxoplasmosis, 2 herpes virus and 1 tuberculosis. In the 27 other cases, it was not possible to state whether the uveitis was associated with the underlying disease (uncontrolled) or a side effect of the biologic/DMARD treatments. The occurrence of the uveitis led to 9 switches in biologic therapy and 13 discontinuations of treatment (8 complete discontinuations, 5 discontinuations only until uveitis remission was obtained). In 4 cases, the treatments were not modified. The database does not specify the ultimate course or rheumatologic disease activity at the time of the uveitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of uveitis while on biologic therapy must not be taken to indicate a therapeutic failure, especially if the ocular manifestation is isolated. In the case of uveitis occurring in patients treated with biologic therapies and/or DMARDs, infectious complications should be ruled out.

Long-term retention rates of adalimumab and infliximab in non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis

The aim of the present study was to compare long-term adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) retention rates in patients with intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis. Additional aims are as follows: (i) to identify any difference in the causes of treatment discontinuation between patients treated with ADA and IFX; (ii) to assess any impact of demographic features, concomitant treatments, and different lines of biologic therapy on ADA and IFX retention rates; and (iii) to identify any correlation between ADA and IFX treatment duration and the age at uveitis onset, the age at onset of the associated systemic diseases, and the age at the start of treatment. Clinical, therapeutic, and demographic data from patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis treated with ADA or IFX were retrospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test were used to assess survival curves. One hundred eight patients (188 eyes) were enrolled; in 87 (80.6%) patients, uveitis was associated with a systemic disease. ADA and IFX were administered in 62 and 46 patients, respectively. No statistically significant differences were identified between ADA and IFX retention rates (p value = 0.22). Similarly, no differences were identified between ADA and IFX retention rates in relation to gender (p value = 0.61 for males, p value = 0.09 for females), monotherapy (p value = 0.08), combination therapy with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (log-rank p value = 0.63), and different lines of biologic therapy (p value = 0.79 for biologic-naïve patients; p value = 0.81 for subjects previously treated with other biologics). In conclusion, ADA and IFX have similar long-term retention rates in patients with non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic features do not affect their long-term effectiveness.

Guidance on Noncorticosteroid Systemic Immunomodulatory Therapy in Noninfectious Uveitis: Fundamentals Of Care for UveitiS (FOCUS) Initiative

TOPIC

An international, expert-led consensus initiative to develop systematic, evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis in the era of biologics.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The availability of biologic agents for the treatment of human eye disease has altered practice patterns for the management of noninfectious uveitis. Current guidelines are insufficient to assure optimal use of noncorticosteroid systemic immunomodulatory agents.

METHODS

An international expert steering committee comprising 9 uveitis specialists (including both ophthalmologists and rheumatologists) identified clinical questions and, together with 6 bibliographic fellows trained in uveitis, conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol systematic review of the literature (English language studies from January 1996 through June 2016; Medline [OVID], the Central Cochrane library, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, BIOSIS, and Web of Science). Publications included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies with sufficient follow-up, case series with 15 cases or more, peer-reviewed articles, and hand-searched conference abstracts from key conferences. The proposed statements were circulated among 130 international uveitis experts for review. A total of 44 globally representative group members met in late 2016 to refine these guidelines using a modified Delphi technique and assigned Oxford levels of evidence.

RESULTS

In total, 10 questions were addressed resulting in 21 evidence-based guidance statements covering the following topics: when to start noncorticosteroid immunomodulatory therapy, including both biologic and nonbiologic agents; what data to collect before treatment; when to modify or withdraw treatment; how to select agents based on individual efficacy and safety profiles; and evidence in specific uveitic conditions. Shared decision-making, communication among providers and safety monitoring also were addressed as part of the recommendations. Pharmacoeconomic considerations were not addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus guidelines were developed based on published literature, expert opinion, and practical experience to bridge the gap between clinical needs and medical evidence to support the treatment of patients with noninfectious uveitis with noncorticosteroid immunomodulatory agents.

Efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs in patients with anterior uveitis: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

To assess the efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs in patients with noninfectious anterior uveitis (AU).

METHODS

Systematic review of studies were retrieved from Medline (1961 to March 2016), Embase (1961 to March 2016), and Cochrane Library (up to March 2016), and a complementary hand search was also performed. The selection criteria were as follows: (population) noninfectious AU patients, adults; (intervention) immunomodulatory drugs (any dose, regimen, route of administration, duration of treatment); (outcome) control of inflammation, steroid-sparing effect, AU flares, adverse events, and so on; (study design) systematic literature reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies. The study quality was assessed using the Jadad scale and according to The Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (update 2009).

RESULTS

We included 13 studies of moderate-poor quality, with a mean duration from 5 months to 20 years, and number of AU patients ranging from 9 to 274. Patient's demographic and clinical characteristics were very heterogeneous. In most cases, uveitis anatomic classification criteria and outcomes definitions were unclear. Some of the studies only included AU patients with a systemic disease associated, mostly spondyloarthritis, others, mixed populations (idiopathic and systemic disease associated patients), and in some articles this data is not described. We found that methotrexate, cyclosporine A, azathioprine, adalimumab, and golimumab might prevent AU flares, improve ocular inflammation and visual acuity, and decrease systemic steroids doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is a lack of robust evidence, methotrexate, cyclosporine A, azathioprine, adalimumab, and golimumab might be effective in AU patients.

Systemic Steroid Sparing Effect of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in Chronic Noninfectious Uveitic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and the systemic corticosteroid sparing effect of a single intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant in patients with chronic noninfectious uveitic macular edema (UME).

METHODS

Data from 22 eyes treated with DEX implant for UME related to systemic or ocular-confined noninfectious diseases were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean systemic prednisone (or equivalent) dosage significantly decreased at 3- and 6-month follow-up evaluations compared to baseline (P = 0.002 and P = 0.01, respectively). Compared to baseline, central macular thickness values significantly decreased at 1-, 3-, and 6-month evaluations after the implantation (P < 0.0001). The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) value gradually improved at 1-, 3-, and 6-month visits compared to baseline (P = 0.009, P = 0.0004, and P = 0.0001, respectively). At fluorescein angiography, active retinal vasculitis was identified in 11 (50%) eyes at baseline, 3 (13.6%) eyes at 1- and 3-month follow-up, and in 2 (9.1%) eyes at the last visit. Regarding side effects, 3/22 (13.6%) eyes presented a newly recognized intraocular hypertension at 1-month follow-up; however, intraocular pressure reverted to normal values within the 6-month follow-up in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with intravitreal DEX implant in noninfectious uveitis allowed a significant corticosteroid sparing effect, a significant improvement in BCVA, and a prompt resolution of UME and vasculitis. No safety issues were observed.

Determination of Genes Related to Uveitis by Utilization of the Random Walk with Restart Algorithm on a Protein-Protein Interaction Network

Uveitis, defined as inflammation of the uveal tract, may cause blindness in both young and middle-aged people. Approximately 10–15% of blindness in the West is caused by uveitis. Therefore, a comprehensive investigation to determine the disease pathogenesis is urgent, as it will thus be possible to design effective treatments. Identification of the disease genes that cause uveitis is an important requirement to achieve this goal. To begin to answer this question, in this study, a computational method was proposed to identify novel uveitis-related genes. This method was executed on a large protein–protein interaction network and employed a popular ranking algorithm, the Random Walk with Restart (RWR) algorithm. To improve the utility of the method, a permutation test and a procedure for selecting core genes were added, which helped to exclude false discoveries and select the most important candidate genes. The five-fold cross-validation was adopted to evaluate the method, yielding the average F1-measure of 0.189. In addition, we compared our method with a classic GBA-based method to further indicate its utility. Based on our method, 56 putative genes were chosen for further assessment. We have determined that several of these genes (e.g., CCL4, Jun, and MMP9) are likely to be important for the pathogenesis of uveitis.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Behçet's disease-related uveitis: a multicenter retrospective observational study

The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) in a large series of Behçet's disease (BD)-related uveitis. We performed a multicenter retrospective observational study including 40 selected patients (66 eyes) receiving ADA. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed at baseline, at 3 and 12 months of treatment. Primary end point was reduction of ocular inflammatory flares. Secondary end points were improvement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), reduction of macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), reduction in the occurrence of vasculitis assessed by fluorescein angiography (FA), and evaluation of statistically significant differences between patients treated with ADA monotherapy and those undergoing ADA plus DMARDs and in patients firstly treated with ADA compared to patients previously administered with other biologics; ADA steroid sparing effect was also evaluated. During the first 12 months of ADA therapy, the number of flares significantly decreased from 200 flares/100 patients/year to 8.5 flares/100 patients/year (p < 0.0001). Similarly, BCVA improved if compared to baseline (7.4 ± 2.9 versus 8.5 ± 2.1, p = 0.03). OCT findings significantly improved showing a mean reduction of central macular thickness (CMT) of 27.27 ± 42.8 μm at the end of follow-up (p < 0.006). FA identified retinal vasculitis in 22 cases at baseline (55%), 8 (20%) cases after 3 months, and in only one (2.5%) case at 12-month follow-up. FA improvement was highly significant at 3- and 12-month follow-up if compared to baseline (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.006, respectively). ADA is highly effective and safe for the treatment of BD-related uveitis, providing a long-term control of ocular inflammation.