Clinical and serological associations of anti-ribosomal P0 protein antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Anti-ribosomal P protein antibodies and insomnia correlate with depression and anxiety in patients suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective

Anxiety and depression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) complicate clinical treatment and can seriously affect prognosis. The present study aims to investigate the effects of the anti-ribosomal P protein antibody (anti-RibP) in the peripheral blood and insomnia on the severity of anxiety and depression in case of SLE. The study compared both the results of the investigation on the objective perceptions of physicians concerning mood changes in patients with SLE and the results of self-rating scales that were completed by the enrolled patients. The conclusion of the comparation is used to determine the probability of the accurate detection of anxiety and depression by physicians. The study aims to assist in the early detection in clinical practice of abnormal emotions in patients with SLE and to summarize common clinical interventions for anxiety and depression.

Method

The relationship between anxiety and depression was evaluated by the Zung self-rating anxiety/depression scale (SAS/SDS). Basic information (e.g., blood type, smoking history, drinking history, educational background, duration of illness), the insomnia severity index (ISI) results, and anti-RibP in the peripheral blood, were investigated in 107 patients with SLE in northeastern China to further analyze the correlation between the severity of depression and anti-RibP, together with the consistency between results of the questionnaire for physicians and the self-rating scale for patients.

Results

Gender, smoking history, drinking history, educational background, and duration of illness were correlated with the SAS/SDS scores (P < 0.05). Family history had a significant effect on the SAS score (P = 0.031), while the SDS score was significantly correlated with blood type (P = 0.021). The ISI score was significantly and positively correlated with the SAS/SDS score (P < 0.001). The titer of anti-RibP showed a correlation with the SDS score (P < 0.05) but not with the SAS score (P = 0.198). The titer of anti-RibP was significantly higher in patients with major depression compared with those with no depression, patients with mild depression, and those with moderate depression (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Anxiety and depression in patients with SLE were correlated with sleeping, educational background, blood type, smoking history, and alcohol consumption. Although anti-RibP was not significantly correlated with anxiety, it indicated a significant correlation with major depression. Clinicians were more accurate in assessing anxiety compared with depression.

Disease criteria of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); the potential role of non-criteria autoantibodies

Patients with SLE show a broad spectrum of more than 200 autoantibodies. They can be pathogenic, predictive, prognostic or even an epiphenomenon. Here, we discuss different autoantibodies that have not been included in EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria. Most of them have been addressed to monitor and detect disease activity and not specifically as classification criteria. Indeed, markers to assess disease activity fluctuate as compared with classification criteria and their validation is different. The development of new methods will probably bring new clinical associations and be evaluated as potential classification criteria.

•

Most of the autoantibodies described in SLE are of utility in monitoring disease activity.

•

The validation of activity biomarkers is different from classification criteria biomarkers.

•

The new methods coming into the clinical routine will bring new associations and potentially classification criteria.

Untangling COVID-19 and autoimmunity: Identification of plausible targets suggests multi organ involvement

Underlying mechanisms of multi-organ manifestations and exacerbated inflammation in COVID-19 are yet to be delineated. The hypothesis of SARS-CoV-2 triggering autoimmunity is gaining attention and, in the present study, we have identified 28 human proteins harbouring regions homologous to SARS-CoV-2 peptides that could possibly be acting as autoantigens in COVID-19 patients displaying autoimmune conditions. Interestingly, these conserved regions are amongst the experimentally validated B cell epitopes of SARS-CoV-2 proteins. The reported human proteins have demonstrated presence of autoantibodies against them in typical autoimmune conditions which may explain the frequent occurrence of autoimmune conditions following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, the proposed autoantigens' widespread tissue distribution is suggestive of their involvement in multi-organ manifestations via molecular mimicry. We opine that our report may aid in directing subsequent necessary antigen-specific studies, results of which would be of long-term relevance in management of extrapulmonary symptoms of COVID-19.

The diagnostic benefit of antibodies against ribosomal proteins in systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Anti-ribosomal P (anti-Rib-P) antibody is a specific serological marker for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and routinely tested by targeting the common epitope of three ribosomal proteins of P0, P1 and P2. This study aimed to investigate if testing antibodies against individual ribosomal protein, but not the common epitope, is required to achieve the best diagnostic benefit in SLE.

METHODS

The study included 82 patients with SLE and 22 healthy donors. Serum antibodies were determined by ELISA and immunoblot.

RESULTS

The prevalence of each antibody determined by ELISA was 35.4% (anti-Rib-P), 45.1% (anti-Rib-P0), 32.9% (anti-Rib-P1) and 40.2% (anti-Rib-P2) at 99% specificity, respectively. Of 53 patients with negative anti-Rib-P antibody, 21 (39.6%) were positive for anti-Rib-P0, 9 (17.0%) for anti-Rib-P1 and 12 (22.6%) for anti-Rib-P2 antibody. The positive rate of anti-Rib-P antibody detected by ELISA was close to the results by immunoblot (33.4%). Patients with any of these antibodies were featured by higher disease activity and prevalence of skin rashes than those with negative antibodies. Moreover, each antibody was particularly related to some clinical and laboratory disorders. The distribution of subclasses of IgG1-4 was varied with each antibody. Anti-Rib-P0 IgG1 and IgG3 were strongly correlated with disease activity and lower serum complement components 3 and 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-Rib-P antibody is not adequate to predict the existence of antibodies against ribosomal P0, P1 and P2 protein. The examination of antibodies against each ribosomal protein is required to achieve additional diagnostic benefit and to evaluate the association with clinical and serological disorders as well.

A review and meta-analysis of anti-ribosomal P autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

The discovery of autoantibodies to ribosomal proteins (anti-RibP) dates back more than fifty years when antibodies to ribosomes were identified in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) sera. Over the years, anti-RibP autoantibodies have been the subject of extensive study and became known as a highly specific biomarker for the diagnosis of SLE and were associated with neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE), lupus nephritis (LN) and hepatitis (LH). As demonstrated by studies on cultured human cells and of murine models, there is evidence to suggest that anti-RibP may have a pathogenic role in LN and NPSLE. Despite a wealth of evidence, in comparison to other SLE autoantibodies such as anti-Sm and anti-dsDNA, anti-RibP has not been included in classification criteria for SLE. A significant challenge is the variability of assays used to detect anti-RibP, including the antigens and diagnostic platforms employed. This may account for the marked variation in frequencies (10-47%) in SLE and its association with clinical and demographic features reported in SLE cohorts. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to help clarify its prevalence, various clinical and serological associations in SLE based on the different RibP antigens and assay platforms used.

Autoantibodies Associated With Connective Tissue Diseases: What Meaning for Clinicians?

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) such as systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, myositis, Sjögren's syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis are systemic diseases which are often associated with a challenge in diagnosis. Autoantibodies (AAbs) can be detected in these diseases and help clinicians in their diagnosis. Actually, pathophysiology of these diseases is associated with the presence of antinuclear antibodies. In the last decades, many new antibodies were discovered, but their implication in pathogenesis of CTDs remains unclear. Furthermore, the classification of these AAbs is nowadays misused, as their targets can be localized outside of the nuclear compartment. Interestingly, in most cases, each antibody is associated with a specific phenotype in CTDs and therefore help in better defining either the disease subtypes or diseases activity and outcome. Because of recent progresses in their detection and in the comprehension of their pathogenesis implication in CTD-associated antibodies, clinicians should pay attention to the presence of these different AAbs to improve patient's management. In this review, we propose to focus on the different phenotypes and features associated with each autoantibody used in clinical practice in those CTDs.