Comparative efficacy between adalimumab and infliximab in the treatment of non-infectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis: a retrospective observational study of 107 patients

Anti-inflammatory Therapy for Sarcoidosis

Over 50% of patients with sarcoidosis will require anti-inflammatory therapy at some point in their disease course. Indications for therapy are to improve health-related quality of life, prevent or arrest organ dysfunction (or organ failure) or avoid death. Recently published treatment guidelines recommended a stepwise approach to therapy however there are some patients for whom up front combination or more intense therapy maybe reasonable. The last decade has seen an explosion of studies and trials evaluating novel therapeutic agents and treatment strategies. Currently available anti-inflammatory therapies and several novel therapies are discussed here.

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Adalimumab Originator to SB5, Adalimumab Biosimilar for Noninfectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from adalimumab originator (Humira, AbbVie) to SB5, adalimumab biosimilar (Adalloce, Samsung Bioepis) in patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU).

METHODS

Fifteen patients (29 eyes) with NIU who were switched from adalimumab originator to SB5 and followed up for 6 months or longer were retrospectively included. Data consisted of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), intraocular pressure (IOP, mmHg), anterior chamber (AC) cell grade, anterior vitreous (AV) cell grade, vitreous haze grade, central macular thickness (CMT, μm), and macular volume (MV, mm3) at pre-switching, 2, 4, and 6 months post-switching.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in BCVA, AC and AV cell grades, and vitreous haze grades at 2, 4, and 6 months post- compared with pre-switching, and no significant differences in CMT and MV at 2 and 6 months post-switching. CMT and MV decreased from 260.55 ± 67.44 μm and 8.37 ± 1.14 mm3 at pre-switching to 244.14 ± 60.31 μm (p = 0.032) and 8.11 ± 1.20 mm3 (p = 0.027) at 4 months post-switching, respectively. There was no recurrence of uveitis, as defined by AC cell grade, vitreous haze, or BCVA. Four patients (27%) were switched back to adalimumab originator after a mean of 9 weeks, due to discomfort during the injection (three patients) and technical difficulty with the new injection device (one patient). No other adverse events occurred after switching to SB5.

CONCLUSION

Switching from adalimumab originator to SB5 for NIU does not result in clinically significant differences in treatment efficacy and safety.

Inflammatory cytokines as mediators of retinal endothelial barrier dysfunction in non-infectious uveitis

Characterised by intraocular inflammation, non-infectious uveitis includes a large group of autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases that either involve the eye alone or have both ocular and systemic manifestations. When non-infectious uveitis involves the posterior segment of the eye, specifically the retina, there is substantial risk of vision loss, often linked to breakdown of the inner blood-retinal barrier. This barrier is formed by non-fenestrated retinal vascular endothelial cells, reinforced by supporting cells that include pericytes, Müller cells and astrocytes. Across the published literature, a group of inflammatory cytokines stand out as prominent mediators of intraocular inflammation, with effects on the retinal endothelium that may contribute to breakdown of the inner blood-retinal barrier, namely tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17 and chemokine C-C motif ligand (CCL)2. This article reviews the function of each cytokine and discusses the evidence for their involvement in retinal endothelial barrier dysfunction in non-infectious uveitis, including basic laboratory investigations, studies of ocular fluids collected from patients with non-infectious uveitis, and results of clinical treatment trials. The review also outlines gaps in knowledge in this area. Understanding the disease processes at a molecular level can suggest treatment alternatives that are directed against appropriate biological targets to protect the posterior segment of eye and preserve vision in non-infectious uveitis.

Successful Remission with Upadacitinib in Two Patients with Anti-TNF-Refractory Macular Edema Associated with Behçet's Uveitis

PURPOSE

Behçet's syndrome (BS) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the small and large vessels of the venous and arterial systems and is characterized by recurrent oral and genital ulcers. Uveitis represents the most typical ocular manifestation and completes the triple symptom complex originally described. Recognized treatments for Behçet's uveitis (BU) include systemic glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents. No study has reported on the use of upadacitinib for BS with panuveitis. Herein, we report the use of upadacitinib in two patients with BU suffering from macular edema and persistent inflammation, which was refractory to systemic glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents.

METHODS

We retrospectively followed-up two cases, including an adolescent girl and a man in his thirties, with a 2- and 10-year history of BS, respectively.

RESULTS

Upadacitinib successfully treated BU, leading to improved visual acuity, controlled intraocular inflammation, and the disappearance of macular edema in both patients. The patients in this study were either recalcitrant to or intolerant to conventional therapy and adalimumab. Only the female patient revealed a mildly abnormal blood picture and slight transaminitis after 6 months of upadacitinib administration. However, no serious adverse events were reported in either of the two patients during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Upadacitinib can be considered an important future option for managing recurrent and recalcitrant cases of BU, especially in those with chronic ocular inflammation and macular edema, which are refractory to conventional therapies.

Systematic review of studies comparing infliximab and adalimumab in autoimmune uveitis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review effectiveness studies comparing two biological anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX), in the management of autoimmune uveitis.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar from 2014 until February 2022. The search included the following keywords "Adalimumab", "Infliximab", "Autoimmune", "Anterior", "Intermediate", "Posterior", "Panuveitis", "Refractory" and "Uveitis". Primary studies comparing both ADA and IFX in a population of autoimmune uveitis patients were considered. Outcomes of interest were measures of response to treatment and incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

The preliminary literature search generated 7156 references. Six studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis; all were non-randomised, retrospective or observational. The included studies found similar effectiveness and side effect profiles for both ADA and IFX in the management of autoimmune uveitis, however, one did not report effectiveness for each separately, and three were limited to Behcet's disease.

CONCLUSION

ADA and IFX seem to display comparable effectiveness and safety profiles. However, the available evidence remains scarce, of low quality and at high risk of bias. A direct comparison between ADA and IFX through large randomised controlled trials is needed to provide more substantial evidence of equivalence or superiority in uveitis.

Comparison of infliximab with adalimumab for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab with that of adalimumab in the treatment of non-infectious uveitis (NIU).

METHODS

We searched for relevant studies in the PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library databases, Grey Matters, Grey Literature Report, OpenGrey, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wan Fang databases up to September 2022. The incidences of complete remission of inflammation, response to therapy, adverse events and corticosteroid-sparing effect were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eleven clinical trials covering 1459 NIU patients were included. Complete remission of inflammation after therapy was achieved in 161 (37.5%) patients in the infliximab group and 151 (39.6%) patients in the adalimumab group. These two groups were not significantly different (P = 0.37). Four studies reported response to anti-TNF therapy involving 449 patients, of whom 241/272 (88.6%) treated with infliximab and 153/177 (86.4%) treated with adalimumab achieved partial or complete remission of inflammation. No significant difference was observed between the two cohorts in terms of response to therapy (P = 0.86). There was no significant difference between infliximab and adalimumab with regard to corticosteroid-sparing effect (P = 0.58). The pooled effect size (P = 0.001) showed a statistically significant difference, with the incidence of adverse events being 17.91% for infliximab and 12.12% for adalimumab.

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 studies suggests that infliximab and adalimumab have similar therapeutic efficacy and corticosteroid-sparing effect in patients with NIU. However, adalimumab has a marginal advantage over infliximab in terms of adverse events. Large-scale RCTs with a longer follow-up are required to further evaluate these two anti-TNF-α agents in patients with NIU.

Biologic therapy in large and small vessels vasculitis, and Behçet's disease: Evidence- and practice-based guidance

OBJECTIVE

Vasculitis are a very heterogenous group of systemic autoimmune diseases, affecting large vessels (LVV), small vessels or presenting as a multisystemic variable vessel vasculitis. We aimed to define evidence and practice-based recommendations for the use of biologics in large and small vessels vasculitis, and Behçet's disease (BD).

METHODS

Recommendations were made by an independent expert panel, following a comprehensive literature review and two consensus rounds. The panel included 17 internal medicine experts with recognized practice on autoimmune diseases management. The literature review was systematic from 2014 until 2019 and later updated by cross-reference checking and experts' input until 2022. Preliminary recommendations were drafted by working groups for each disease and voted in two rounds, in June and September 2021. Recommendations with at least 75% agreement were approved.

RESULTS

A total of 32 final recommendations (10 for LVV treatment, 7 for small vessels vasculitis and 15 for BD) were approved by the experts and several biologic drugs were considered with different supporting evidence. Among LVV treatment options, tocilizumab presents the higher level of supporting evidence. Rituximab is recommended for treatment of severe/refractory cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. Infliximab and adalimumab are most recommended in treatment of severe/refractory BD manifestations. Other biologic drugs can be considered is specific presentations.

CONCLUSION

These evidence and practice-based recommendations are a contribute to treatment decision and may, ultimately, improve the outcome of patients living with these conditions.

Anti-TNF vs tocilizumab in refractory uveitic cystoid macular edema due to Behcet's disease. Multicenter study of 49 patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of TNF inhibitors (adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX)) vs tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with refractory cystoid macular edema (CME) due to Behçet's disease (BD).

METHODS

Multicenter study of patients with BD-associated CME refractory to conventional and/or biological immunosuppressive drugs. From a cohort of 177 patients treated with anti-TNF and 14 patients treated with TCZ, we selected those with CME at baseline. We analyzed the evolution of macular thickness (main outcome), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular inflammation (Tyndall and vitritis) from baseline up to 4 years in the 3 groups mentioned.

RESULTS

49 patients and 72 eyes with CME were included. ADA was used in 25 patients (40 eyes), IFX in 15 (21 eyes) and TCZ in 9 (11 eyes). No statistically significant baseline differences were observed between the 3 groups except for a lower basal BCVA in TCZ group and a higher basal degree of intraocular inflammation in ADA group. Most patients from all groups had received several conventional immunosuppressive drugs. In addition, most patients in the group of TCZ had also received anti-TNF agents. Biological therapy was used in monotherapy (n=8) or combined with conventional immunosuppressive drugs (n=41). Macular thickness progressively decreased in the 3 groups, with no signs of CME after 1 year of treatment. Similarly, BCVA improvement and inflammatory intraocular remission was achieved in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Refractory CME associated with BD uveitis can be effectively treated either with ADA, IFX or TCZ. Furthermore, TCZ is effective in patients resistant to anti-TNF therapy.

Current pharmacological solutions for Behçet's syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Behçet's syndrome (BS) has a heterogeneous clinical phenotype, and its clinical manifestations may respond differently to drugs commonly used to treat BS. The type, dose, and duration of immunomodulatory, immunosuppressive, and biologic agents should be tailored individually.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the literature for articles on BS management that were published until June 2022 and summarized the management options in BS for each type of organ involvement. We aimed to cover all currently available pharmacological agents used in BS, as well as surgical and interventional options, focusing on recent evidence.

EXPERT OPINION

The management aims in BS are to preserve function and quality of life and to avoid damage. The choice of treatment modalities depends on the organs that are actively involved, the severity of that involvement, and prognostic factors. A treat-to-attack strategy would help improve long-term outcomes in BS.

Local versus Systemic Therapy for Noninfectious Uveitis (NIU)

The mainstay of treatment for noninfectious uveitis (NIU) is immunosuppressant therapy. This may come in a localized form that is administered specifically to the eye or a systemic form that penetrates ocular tissues. Over the last twenty years, both local and systemic treatments have undergone advancements in pharmaceutical development. In this review, we will discuss new therapies and analyze the risks and benefits for all existing NIU therapies. Some of these therapies include topical, intravitreal, periocular, and systemic steroids, as well as systemic antimetabolites, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, T-cell inhibitors, anti-CD 20 agents, interleukin-6 inhibitors, alkylating agents, and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Off-label use of canakinumab in pediatric rheumatology and rare diseases

Since the first success of interleukin-1 blockade in cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome, the use of interleukin-1 inhibitors has expanded to other disorders, including off-label indications. In particular, canakinumab has been employed in an off-label fashion in several diseases such as rare monogenic autoinflammatory diseases and multifactorial autoinflammatory diseases, disclosing an excellent efficacy and good safety profile in pediatric patients unresponsive to standards of care. In addition, hyperferritinemic syndromes and complex disorders, as well as Kawasaki disease, uveitis, and other pediatric rare disorders, represent additional areas where canakinumab efficacy is worth exploring. Altogether, the results summarized below are of paramount importance in pediatric patients where a considerable proportion of treatments are prescribed off-label. This review focuses on the off-label use of canakinumab in pediatric patients affected by systemic immune-mediated diseases.

Monoclonal Antibodies: A Therapeutic Option for the Treatment of Ophthalmic Diseases of the Eye Posterior Segment

The eye is an organ that allows us to observe the outside world. Pathologies of the eye's posterior segment, such as glaucoma, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, uveitis, and retinoblastoma, cause vision loss. Traditional treatments consist of applying topical medications that do not penetrate properly or using high doses that generate adverse effects. Different laser surgeries stop the pathology's progression but do not allow visual improvement. So, an alternative is to use monoclonal antibodies, proteins produced by different processes that selectively bind to metabolites associated with diseases, reducing the adverse effects of traditional treatments and improving the application of the drug in the area. The two main molecular targets are TNF (adalimumab, infliximab, and certolizumab pegol) and VEGF (bevacizumab and ranibizumab); other possibilities are under investigation.

Progress in the pharmacotherapy of uveitis: the art of personalized care

INTRODUCTION

Uveitis is a heterogeneous group of inflammatory intraocular disorders which can lead to blindness, but prompt diagnosis and management can improve visual outcomes and reduce treatment burden.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors provide an overview of commonly used treatments of the management of non-infectious uveitis.

EXPERT OPINION

Initially, the treatment of non-infectious uveitis was limited to corticosteroids which have a broad range of adverse ocular and systemic effects. Now new options, such as biological response modulators, are a novel yet exciting addition to this armory and have the potential to change the course of treatment as well as prognostic outcomes for uveitis patients. Additionally, further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of this novel class of immunomodulators in uveitis therapy.

Intermediate Uveitis: A Review

PURPOSE

This review aims to provide an update on the clinical presentation, etiologies, complications, and treatment options in intermediate uveitis (IU).

METHODS

Narrative literature review.

RESULTS

IU affects all age groups with no clear gender predominance and has varied etiologies including systemic illnesses and infectious diseases, or pars planitis. In some instances, IU may be the sole presentation of an underlying associated condition or disease. Management of IU and its complications include administration of corticosteroids, antimetabolites, T-cell inhibitors, and/or biologics, along with surgical interventions, with varying degrees of effectiveness across literature. In particular, increasing evidence of the safety and efficacy of immunomodulatory agents and biologics has seen greater adoption of these therapies in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

IU is an anatomical description of uveitis, involving intraocular inflammation of the vitreous, peripheral retinal vasculature, and pars plana. Various treatment options for intermediate uveitis are currently used in practice.

Role of anti-TNF in Pediatric Inflammatory Choroidal Neovascularization: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the safety and efficacy of Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (anti-TNF) in inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the pediatric population.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Three patients, < 16 years old with uveitic inflammatory CNV.

METHODS

Patients received systemic steroids, methotrexate (MTX), intravitreal (IVT) injections of bevacizumab, and anti-TNF (infliximab or adalimumab) in case of refractory leakage.

RESULTS

Five eyes of three pediatric patients (mean age 6 years old) presenting with CNV and put on anti-TNF were followed up for a minimum of 32 months. Four out of five eyes had improved vision, reduced fluid on clinical exam and macular spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and cessation of leakage on fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) after introduction of anti-TNF agents. Two patients developed minor psoriasis treated topically.

CONCLUSION

Anti-TNF agents showed efficacy and safety in a sustainable leakage control of inflammatory pediatric CNV along with improvement in vision.

Lower Relapses Rate With Infliximab Versus Adalimumab in Sight-Threatening Uveitis: A Multicenter Study of 330 Patients

PURPOSE

To compare the relapse rate of sight-threatening noninfectious uveitis (NIU) in patients treated with infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA).

DESIGN

Observational retrospective multicenter study.

METHODS

A total of 330 patients (median age, 36 years; interquartile range, 27-54), 45.2% men) with sight-threatening NIU (ie, retinal vasculitis and/or macular edema) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α agents (IFX intravenously at 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 4 to 6 weeks or ADA subcutaneously at 80 mg, then 40 mg every 2 weeks). Data were obtained retrospectively from patients' medical records. Main outcome measures were relapse rate, complete response of NIU, corticosteroid sparing effect, and safety.

RESULTS

Main etiologies of uveitis included Behçet disease (27%), idiopathic juvenile arthritis (5.8%), and sarcoidosis (5.5%). The estimated relapse rate at 6 months after introduction of biological agents was 13% (95% CI = 0.009-0.16). IFX was associated with less relapse risk than ADA (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36- 0.77, P = .001). ADA and IFX were comparable in terms of complete response rate of NIU as well as corticosteroid-sparing effect. Behçet disease was associated with higher odds of complete response (HR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.16 -3.60, P = .01] and lower relapse rate (HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33-0.85, P = .009) than other causes of NIU with anti-TNF-α agents.

CONCLUSIONS

In sight-threatening NIU, IFX seems to be associated with a lower relapse rate than ADA.

Half-fluence Photodynamic Therapy for Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in a Patient Receiving Corticosteroids for Behçet's Uveitis

Corticosteroid-induced central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) has been reported to develop in many intraocular inflammatory diseases and usually resolves spontaneously after discontinuation of corticosteroids. Patients without any improvement may require alternative therapies. In this case report, we present the case of a 35-year-old man with Behçet’s disease who had complaints of decreased vision due to CSCR in his left eye while using systemic corticosteroids along with cyclosporine and azathioprine. Half-fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) was performed because the CSCR did not regress despite discontinuation of systemic corticosteroids. After treatment, his visual acuity increased with complete resolution of the subfoveal fluid. Half-fluence PDT seems to be an effective and safe treatment for patients who develop acute CSCR while under systemic or local corticosteroid therapy for intraocular inflammatory diseases such as Behçet’s uveitis and do not improve despite steroid discontinuation.

Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness of Adalimumab in Japanese Patients with Noninfectious Intermediate, Posterior, or Panuveitis: Post-Marketing Surveillance of 251 Patients

Introduction

The aim of this nationwide, prospective post-marketing surveillance was to assess the safety and effectiveness of up to 52 weeks of adalimumab treatment in patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis in Japanese clinical practice.

Methods

This post-marketing surveillance was conducted at 60 medical facilities in Japan from October 2016 to June 2020. Patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis who were administered adalimumab (Humira^®, AbbVie Inc.) for the first time were eligible. Subcutaneous adalimumab was initially administered at 80 mg, followed by 40 mg 1 week later, then 40 mg every 2 weeks. Safety measures included the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs; primary endpoint). Effectiveness measures included visual acuity, anterior chamber cell grade, vitreous haze, macular edema, foveal retinal thickness, uveitis recurrence rate, and oral corticosteroid dose. Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25).

Results

During 52 weeks of surveillance, AEs and ADRs occurred in 70 (27.9%) and 47 (18.7%) of 251 patients, respectively. The most common ADR was infection (21/251 patients; 8.4%), including serious infections in eight (3.2%) patients. ADRs were more frequent in patients ≥ 65 years of age, those with concurrent diseases, and those with past medical history. Four patients developed tuberculosis. The uveitis recurrence rate was 24.8% (61/246 patients). All effectiveness measures tended to improve from baseline to week 52, and mean corticosteroid doses decreased. Clinically meaningful changes were observed for most VFQ-25 subscales.

Conclusions

The safety profile of adalimumab was generally consistent with previous reports, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02916017.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00493-z.

Intraocular surgery under adalimumab therapy in patients with refractory uveitis: a single center study of 23 eyes

PURPOSE

We assessed the efficacy and safety of performing intraocular surgery for refractory uveitis under adalimumab (ADA) therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center cohort study between 2016 and 2019.

METHODS

In uveitis patients undergoing intraocular surgery under ADA treatment, we collected clinical data before surgery, and at the first visit, 6 months and last visit after surgery (follow-up 19.3 ± 8.1 months). Primary outcomes were visual acuity (VA) improvement in patients after cataract surgery, intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients after trabeculectomy and intraocular inflammation in all patients. Secondary outcomes were activated inflammation, vitreous opacity (OCV), uveitic macula edema (UME) and infection.

RESULTS

Of 81 patients (161 eyes) initiated ADA therapy for uveitis, 19 patients (23 eyes) underwent intraocular surgery and were analyzed. Twelve of 18 eyes (66.6%) that underwent cataract surgery or vitrectomy with/without cataract surgery had improved VA at the last visit compared to before surgery. All 5 eyes that underwent trabeculectomy showed controlled IOP 6 months after surgery. Intraocular inflammation was resolved in 22 of 23 eyes at the first postoperative visit. Postoperative intraocular inflammation recurred in 3 eyes; 2 with UME, 1 with OCV. No eyes developed infection postoperatively. Preoperative ADA therapy duration was unrelated to relapse of intraocular inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Surgery for refractory uveitis under ADA treatment is safe and achieves good visual outcome and uveitis control if inflammation exists before surgery. ADA does not increase the risk of infections. Intraoperative findings of UME at surgery requires attention for postoperative relapse.

Recent Insights into the Management of Behçet Syndrome

Behçet syndrome (BS) is a multisystem vasculitis with variable vessel involvement that shows significant heterogeneity among patients in terms of clinical manifestations and disease course. Treatment choice and response are both influenced by this heterogeneity. BS treatments’ main goals are to quickly suppress inflammatory exacerbations and prevent relapses in order to protect organ functions and provide good quality of life. Besides the long-term experience with steroids and traditional immunosuppressives, biologic drugs, especially TNF inhibitors, have gained increasing importance in the treatment of BS over the years. In this review, we aimed to give an overview of the studies with conventional and biological drugs with proven efficacy in the treatment of BS, as well as promising drugs and current management strategies according to clinical phenotypes.

Behçet disease: From pathogenesis to novel therapeutic options

Behçet disease (BD) is a complex, multi-systemic inflammatory condition mainly hallmarked by oral and genital ulcers which can also affect the vessels, gastrointestinal tract, central nervous system and even the axial skeleton. Without a clear classification among autoimmune or autoinflammatory conditions, BD has been recently classified as a MHC-I-opathy. BD aetiology is still obscure, but it is thought that certain microorganisms can elicit an aberrant adaptive immune response in the presence of a permissive genetic background. Altered T-cell homeostasis, mostly Th1/Th17 expansion and Treg impairment, could lead to an overactivation of the innate immunity, which underlies tissue damage and thus, signs and symptoms. Immunosuppression and/or immunomodulation are central to the BD management. A complex armamentarium ranging from classical synthetic disease-modifying antirrheumatic drugs to new-era biologic agents or small molecules is available in BD, with different therapeutic outcomes depending on disease manifestations. However, the precise disease mechanisms that underlie BD symptoms are not fully deciphered, which may limit their therapeutic potential and add a significant layer of complexity to the treatment decision-making process. The aim of the present review is to provide an exhaustive overview of the latest breakthroughs in BD pathogenesis and therapeutic options.

Effectiveness of SB5, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, in Patients With Noninfectious Uveitis: A Real-Life Monocentric Experience

PURPOSE

Several concerns have arisen with biosimilars in terms of immunogenicity, safety issues, loss of efficacy, and extrapolation to other indications. The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy of SB5, an adalimumab biosimilar, in noninfectious uveitis (NIU).

DESIGN

Retrospective nonrandomized study.

METHODS

Data from patients with refractory NIU treated with SB5 (Imraldi, Biogen) were analyzed at baseline, 3 months after SB5 initiation and at the last follow-up in terms of uveitis relapses, occurrence of retinal vasculitis, resolution of uveitic macular edema (UME), best-corrected visual acuity, glucocorticoids (GCs)-sparing effect and drug survival.

RESULTS

Uveitis relapses decreased from 121 relapses/100 patients/year in the 12 months before SB5 initiation to 4 relapses/100 patients/year during the first 12 months of treatment (P = 0.0004). Uveitis was inactive in 46/47 eyes at the end of the study period. The number of eyes with active retinal vasculitis decreased during the study period (P < 0.0001). At baseline, 6 eyes presented UME, whereas no eye had UME at the last follow-up. Mean best-corrected visual acuity increased from 7.7 ± 3.41 at baseline to 8.9 ± 2.46 at the last follow-up (P = 0.0045). Mean GCs daily dosage decreased from 18.33 ± 10.33 mg at baseline to 5.75 ± 2.29 mg at the last follow-up (P = 0.018). The cumulative SB5 retention rate was 91.8% at both 12- and 20-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

SB5 biosimilar is effective in NIU by drastically reducing uveitis relapses and the occurrence of retinal vasculitis. Moreover, SB5 biosimilar improved visual acuity, allowed a significant GCs-sparing effect and showed an excellent drug retention rate.

Response to the Second TNF-α Inhibitor (Adalimumab or Infliximab) after Failing the First One in Refractory Idiopathic Inflammatory Retinal Vascular Leakage

Purpose: To determine the response to the second TNF-α inhibitor (adalimumab and infliximab) after failing the first agent in idiopathic inflammatory retinal vascular leakage.Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective observational case series. Patients with the diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory retinal vascular leakage who had received both infliximab and adalimumab were included in the study.Results: Twelve and 15 patients received adalimumab (Group one) and infliximab (Group two) as the first treatment, respectively. The remission rates between Group one (58.3%) and Group two (66.7%) were not statistically significant. (P = .4) As the second agent, adalimumab was more effective in younger patients (27.5 ± 20.6) compared to older patients (48.75 ± 10.2). (P = .03). Moreover, patients with lower vision responded marginally better to infliximab as the second treatment (P = .06).Conclusion: Either TNF-α inhibitor, adalimumab and infliximab, can be employed in the treatment of the patients with idiopathic inflammatory retinal vascular leakage who fail one of these agents.

Biologic and advanced immunomodulating therapeutic options for sarcoidosis: a clinical update

Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a multi-organ disease with a wide range of clinical manifestations and outcomes. A quarter of sarcoidosis patients require long-term treatment for chronic disease. In this group, corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents be insufficient to control diseaseAreas covered: Several biologic agents have been studied for treatment of chronic pulmonary and extra-pulmonary disease. A review of the available literature was performed searching PubMed and an expert opinion regarding specific therapy was developed.Expert opinion: These agents have the potential of treating patients who have progressive disease. Many of these agents have different mechanisms of action, response rates, and toxicity profiles.

Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Treatment in the Management of Pediatric Noninfectious Uveitis: Infliximab Versus Adalimumab

Purpose: Management of uveitis displays a particular challenge in childhood. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) in pediatric noninfectious uveitis that were refractory to conventional immunosuppresives. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 33 patients who were treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (16 with IFX and 17 with ADA). Patients had diverse etiologies, including juvenile idiopathic arthritis, idiopathic uveitis, and Behçet's disease. Demographic characteristics, systemic diagnosis, findings of the ophthalmological examination, control of ocular inflammation, response to treatment, and the rate of clinical remission were studied. Results: Fourteen (87.5%) patients receiving IFX and 10 (58.8%) patients receiving ADA achieved response to treatment during the follow-up (P = 0.118). The agents were discontinued with complete clinical remission in 6 (37.5%) patients receiving IFX and in 2 (11.8%) patients receiving ADA (P = 0.118). Baseline visual acuities and parameters of inflammation improved significantly in both groups after anti-TNF therapy. Conclusion: Both IFX and ADA are safe and effective for pediatric noninfectious uveitis.

Biologic Drugs for the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis

ABSTRACT

The management of noninfectious uveitis is constantly evolving. A new "biologic era" in treatment began after the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocking drugs was demonstrated in rheumatologic inflammatory diseases. The goal of specific immunomodulation with a biologic drug is to target inflammation at the molecular level with a low rate of serious adverse events. The purpose of this review is to summarize current knowledge of biologic drugs in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis by describing clinical studies and recent pharmacological developments.

A 10-year follow-up of infliximab monotherapy for refractory uveitis in Behçet's syndrome

Infliximab (IFX) was the first biologic introduced for refractory uveitis treatment in Behçet’s syndrome (BS). However, there have been few reports on the safety and efficacy of IFX monotherapy over follow-up periods of more than 10 years. This retrospective study evaluated the 10-year safety and efficacy of IFX monotherapy compared to IFX combination therapies with colchicine or corticosteroid for refractory uveitis in BS patients. Monotherapy was performed in 30 eyes of 16 patients while combination therapies were performed in 20 eyes of 11 patients. Continuation of IFX occurred in 70.3% of enrolled patients for 10 years without any significant difference noted in the retention rate between the monotherapy and combination therapies (p = 0.86). Reduction of ocular inflammatory attacks and improvement of best corrected visual acuity occurred in the monotherapy group after 10 years, which was equivalent to that for the combination therapies. Although adverse events (AEs) or therapy discontinuation occurred during the initial 5 years in both therapies, no AEs were observed for either therapy after 6 years. Our results suggested that IFX monotherapy proved to be effective and not inferior to combination therapies over a 10-year follow-up. Although loss of response and AEs may be noticed during the initial 5-year period, a safe and effective continuation can be expected thereafter.

Biotherapies in Uveitis

Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) represents one of the leading causes of blindness in developed countries. The therapeutic strategy aims to rapidly control intra-ocular inflammation, prevent irremediable ocular damage, allow corticosteroid sparing and save the vision, and has evolved over the last few years. Anterior NIU is mostly managed with topical treatment in adults. However, for intermediate, posterior and pan-uveitis, notably when both eyes are involved, systemic treatment is usually warranted. Biotherapies are recommended in case of inefficacy or non-tolerance of conventional immunosuppressive drugs in non-anterior NIU. Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-α) agents are by far the most widely used, especially adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX). In case of sight-threatening uveitis in Behçet's disease or in case of risk of severe recurrences, respectively IFX and ADA may be recommended as first-line therapy. Many questions are left unanswered; how long to treat NIU, how to discontinue anti-TNF-α agents, what biologic to use in case of anti-TNF-α failure? The objective of this review is to present an updated overview of knowledge on the use of biological treatments in NIU.

Long-term Follow-up and Optimization of Infliximab in Refractory Uveitis Due to Behçet Disease: National Study of 103 White Patients

OBJECTIVE

In a large series of White patients with refractory uveitis due to Behçet disease (BD) being treated with infliximab (IFX), we assessed (1) long-term efficacy and safety of IFX, and (2) IFX optimization when ocular remission was achieved.

METHODS

Our multicenter study of IFX-treated patients with BD uveitis refractory to conventional immunosuppressant agents treated 103 patients/185 affected eyes with IFX as first biologic therapy in the following intervals: 3-5 mg/kg intravenous at 0, 2, 6, and then every 4-8 weeks. The main outcome variables were analyzed at baseline, first week, first month, sixth month, first year, and second year of IFX therapy. After remission, based on a shared decision between patient and clinician, IFX optimization was performed. Efficacy, safety, and cost of IFX therapy were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the whole series (n = 103), main outcome variables showed a rapid and maintained improvement, reaching remission in 78 patients after a mean IFX duration of 31.5 months. Serious adverse events were observed in 9 patients: infusion reactions (n = 4), tuberculosis (n = 1), Mycobacterium avium pneumonia (n = 1), severe oral ulcers (n = 1), palmoplantar psoriasis (n = 1), and colon carcinoma (n = 1). In the optimization subanalysis, the comparative study between optimized and nonoptimized groups showed (1) no differences in clinical characteristics at baseline, (2) similar maintained improvement in most ocular outcomes, (3) lower severe adverse events, and (4) lower mean IFX costs in the optimized group (€4826.52 vs €9854.13 per patient/yr).

CONCLUSION

IFX seems to be effective and relatively safe in White patients with refractory BD uveitis. IFX optimization is effective, safe, and cost-effective.

Systemic immunosuppressive therapies for uveitis in developing countries

There are multiple approaches to inhibit inflammatory molecules and pathways in noninfectious uveitis. The cornerstone of local and systemic anti-inflammatory treatment is corticosteroid therapy. Corticosteroids remain the most potent and efficacious drugs for treating intraocular inflammation. However, their long-term use is limited by their medium- and long-term side effects, which are a major concern. The approach taken to limit corticosteroid side effects is to introduce steroid-sparing agents that suppress the inflammatory pathways and immune response differently than corticosteroids. There are several classes of such drugs that are affordable, effective, and generally well-tolerated. Relatively recently, an increasing range of biologic agents has become available to treat intraocular inflammation. However, the relatively expensive cost of these therapies limits their use in the developing world. This systemic review aimst to discuss the use of corticosteroids and different immunosuppressive regimens in the management of various uveitides.

Anti-TNF-α Therapy for Refractory Uveitis Associated with Behçet's Syndrome and Sarcoidosis: A Single Center Study of 131 Patients

PURPOSE

The efficacy of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) for treating Behçet's syndrome (BS) and sarcoidosis has not been compared adequately.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients with uveitis diagnosed at Tokyo Medical University Hospital and compared the efficacy of IFX and ADA for BS and the efficacy of ADA for sarcoidosis and BS.

RESULTS

68 patients in IFX group and 63 patients in ADA group were analyzed. In BS patients, IFX and ADA were both effective in improving uveitic macular edema (UME). ADA improved UME in BS but not in sarcoidosis patients. The efficacy of ADA in reducing doses of corticosteroids and glaucoma medications was better in sarcoidosis than in the BS group.

CONCLUSION

Both IFX and ADA are efficacious in improving UME in BS patients. The reason that ADA improves UME better in BS than in sarcoidosis may be due to the difference in pathogenesis between these diseases.

The current status of biological treatment for uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Noninfectious uveitis represents one of the leading causes of blindness in developed Countries, compromising patients' quality of life and social functioning. The main treatment goals are the control of ocular inflammation, to avert and treat sight-threatening complications, thus preserving and/or restoring visual function.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript deals with systemic therapy with biologic drugs for noninfectious uveitis. An extensive literature search in the MEDLINE database (via PubMed) has been performed up to June 2020. The major classes of biologic molecules employed in ocular inflammatory diseases have been reviewed, focusing on TNF inhibitors, IL-1, IL-6, IL-17, IL-23 inhibitors, interferons, rituximab, and abatacept efficacy and safety. An overview of most recent developments in the field has been provided as well, with reference to the experience with JAK inhibitors and with biosimilar drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

The development of the concept of targeted therapy and the subsequent introduction of biologic molecules in clinical practice have revolutionized the prognosis of uveitis. The target of a rapid and sustained steroid-free remission of ocular inflammation should be pursued for all patients early in the disease course, in order to have a better chance to improve the final visual outcome.

Recent advances in the management of non-infectious posterior uveitis

PURPOSE

To review the current regimens and novel therapeutic modalities in various stages of research and development for the management of non-infectious posterior uveitis (NIPU).

METHODS

We performed a thorough review of current literature using PubMed, Google Scholar and Clinicaltrials.gov to identify the published literature about the available therapeutics and novel drugs/therapies in different stages of clinical trials.

RESULTS

The current management regimen for non-infectious posterior uveitis includes corticosteroids, immunomodulatory therapies and anti-metabolites. However, NIPU requires long-term management for efficacious remission of the disease and to prevent disease relapse. Long-term safety issues associated with steroids have led to efforts to develop novel therapeutic agents including biological response modulators and immunosuppressants. The current therapeutic agents in various stages of development include calcineurin inhibitors, biologic response modifiers and a more a comprehensive modalities like ocular gene therapy as well as novel drug delivery mechanisms for higher bioavailability to the target tissues, with minimal systemic effects.

CONCLUSION

Novel efficacious therapeutic modalities under development will help overcome the challenges associated with the traditional therapeutic agents.

Effectiveness and safety profile of anakinra in a HLA-B27 positive patient with multiple sclerosis-associated uveitis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disorder of central nervous system (CNS) leading to neurological disability. A wide variety of ophthalmic and neuro-ophthalmic manifestations have been associated with MS. Although this link is well recognized, controversial is still the risk of developing MS in patients with ophthalmic manifestations. Intermediate uveitis followed by panuveitis are the most common manifestations among the ophthalmic involvement in MS. Timely management of uveitis, is a crucial step to prevent irreversible visual impairment. A multidisciplinary team including ophthalmologists together with other specialists is required in the majority of cases for an adequate diagnostic and therapeutic approach of uveitis. Corticosteroids represent the mainstay of therapy in the acute phase, whereas conventional immunosuppressive drugs such as azathioprine may allow a steroid sparing effect. Increasing evidence from anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab have proven the efficacy on clinical and radiological outcomes in MS, on the contrary anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) monoclonal antibodies such as infliximab and adalimumab are contraindicated in patients with demyelinating disorders, as they seem to worsen disease and neurological clinical symptoms. On this basis, MS-associated uveitis may deeply influence the therapeutic choices suggesting targeting inflammatory cytokines different from TNF. Recently, interleukin (IL)-1 blockade has been investigated as possible therapeutic tool in several inflammatory eye conditions such as Behcet's disease related uveitis, strengthening that IL-1 is also critical for the development of uveitis. Herein, we report our experience in a HLA-B27 positive patient with MS-associated uveitis successfully treated with the short-acting IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra.

Cytokine Profiling in Aqueous Humor Samples From Patients With Non-Infectious Uveitis Associated With Systemic Inflammatory Diseases

Non-infectious uveitis are intraocular inflammatory conditions caused by dysregulated activation of the immune response without any detectable infectious agents. The aim of this study was to explore potential markers and therapeutic targets for two distinct types of non-infectious uveitis associated with Behçet's disease (BD) and Vogt Koyanagi Harada (VKH) disease. Concentrations of 27 cytokines were investigated in aqueous humor (AH) samples from patients with active uveitis vs. healthy controls (HC) (n = 10 patients with BD-associated uveitis; n = 10 patients with VKH-associated uveitis; n = 10 HC) using the Bio-Plex Pro^TM human cytokine group I panel. Additionally, leukocytes in AH samples were counted with hemocytometers and characterized by flow cytometry. Eleven cytokines were differentially expressed between patients with uveitis and HC with a median concentration greater than 10 pg/ml. IL-6, IP-10, G-CSF, and IFNγ showed higher concentrations in AH samples from both BD and VKH patients while IL-2, IL-8, IL-13, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-1ra showed statistically significant higher concentrations only in AH samples from BD patients. GM-CSF was the sole cytokine with an opposite profile showing decreased levels in AH samples from BD patients. IL-1ra and IL-6 were detected at higher frequencies in AH samples from BD and VKH patients compared with those from HC while IFNγ and TNFα were not detected in HC. The concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, G-CSF, IFNγ, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-1ra positively correlated with the concentrations of leukocytes in AH, suggesting that such cytokines can be produced by immune cells and/or attract and/or promote proliferation and survival of immune cells in these types of uveitis. The correlation matrix of cytokine concentrations in AH samples revealed that IFNγ, TNFα, eotaxin, IL-6, G-CSF highly correlated each other. The ratios of cytokine concentrations between AH and plasma intra-individuals showed that IL-2, IL-6, IP-10, GM-CSF were increased intraocularly. In conclusion, AH sampling followed by multiplex analysis of cytokines should be fostered in non-infectious uveitis to identify cytokines dysregulated intraocularly in each individual laying the groundwork for precision medicine.

Medical Therapy of Uveitic Macular Edema: Biologic Agents

Introduction: Uveitic macular edema (UME) is a significant cause of visual impairment in all uveitis types. Methods: Reports that were cited in the MEDLINE database, that analyzed the effectiveness of biologics for UME in at least five patients, with a minimum follow-up of 3 months, published prior to April 1, 2019 were included. Reports that did not compare UME findings before and after the therapy, using either OCT or fluorescein angiography, were excluded. Results: Case series that analyzed the efficacy of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents showed modest, short-term benefit. Studies that investigated systemic anti-TNF agents in patients with noninfectious uveitis reported a therapeutic effect on UME. Anti-IL-6 antibodies have shown promising results for most severe cases of noninfectious UME. Interferon represents an option for patients with persistent UME in infectious and noninfectious uveitis. Conclusion: Multicenter, randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of each group of biologic agents in sufficient number of patients.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis

Introduction: Uveitis is a leading cause of visual impairment and a significant burden of blindness. Although corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents have been successfully used, these are non-specific, and their long-term use may induce significant adverse effects. Areas covered: This article discusses existing local and systemic applied treatments for ocular inflammation including corticosteroids, non-biologic, and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD). Potential drugs being studied in clinical trials are introduced for both local and systemic use. Expert opinion: Treatment options for uveitis continue to expand. Still, more efforts and research are needed to better understand the mechanisms potentially leading to clinical trials.

Long-Term Outcomes of Treatment with Biological Agents in Eyes with Refractory, Active, Noninfectious Intermediate Uveitis, Posterior Uveitis, or Panuveitis

PURPOSE

To examine a large cohort of patients treated with biologic agents for active noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis (NIPPU) and to compare their efficacy and long-term effect.

DESIGN

Retrospective, longitudinal study.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-two patients (156 eyes) with active NIPPU after failure of treatment with corticosteroids and a second-line immunosuppression drug and treated with biologic agents who were treated at Moorfields Eye Hospital between 2001 and 2016.

METHODS

Information was gathered from the clinical notes of all patients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time to first disease flare, rate of treatment failure, best-corrected visual acuity, and risk factors for treatment failure.

RESULTS

Patients were followed on average for 4.7±0.4 years (724 eye-years). All patients demonstrated active uveitis at baseline, and 34 patients (41.5%) demonstrated a coexisting active systemic disease. Control of ocular inflammation was achieved in 136 eyes (87.2%). The average oral prednisolone dose at baseline was 16.4±1.7 mg/day, and by 6 months reduced to 6.5±0.7 mg/day (P < 0.0001), remaining stable for up to 5 years follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity at baseline was 0.5±0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), improved to 0.4±0.1 logMAR (P = 0.008) at 3 months, and remained stable during follow-up. After baseline, 42.3% of eyes experienced flares, and the average number of flares reduced from 1.8±0.1 flares/year to 0.6±0.1 flares/year (P < 0.0001). Median time to first flare was 5.4 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-5.4 years) with a 5-year survival rate of 58.7%. Treatment failed in 37 eyes (23.7%), with a 5-year survival rate of 68.0% and an estimated time to 75% survival of 2.9 years (95% CI, 2.1-4.4 years). The risk for treatment failure was lower when treatment used adalimumab (odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9; P = 0.03) but was greater when systemic disease also was active at baseline (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-7.1; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, eyes treated with biologic agents after failure of treatment with corticosteroids and a second-line immunosuppression drug experienced satisfactory disease control (87.2%), reduced use of systemic immunosuppression, stable visual acuity, and a 23.7% risk of disease relapse. After multivariate adjustment, older age, treatment with adalimumab (versus infliximab), and inactive concomitant systemic disease were associated with a lower risk of treatment failure.

The effectiveness of adalimumab treatment for non-infectious uveitis

Uveitis, which is a major cause of blindness worldwide, is defined as intraocular inflammation that affects the iris, ciliary body, vitreous, retina and choroid. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is a key cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of many inflammatory diseases including uveitis. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents are the conventional therapy to treat non-infectious uveitis. In cases that are resistant to these therapies, anti-TNF agents are added. An anti-TNF-α agent, adalimumab, was recently approved for the treatment of refractory non-infectious uveitis. In this review, we provide an introduction to uveitis and summarize the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in the treatment of non-infectious uveitis.

Expert opinion on the use of biological therapy in non-infectious uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Conventional immunosuppressive drugs, anti-TNF alpha treatments and biotherapies are increasingly being used in non-infectious uveitis.

AREAS COVERED

The present work was led by a multidisciplinary panel of experts, including internal medicine specialists, rheumatologists and ophthalmologists, and proposes an extensive review on the use of biological agents in non-infectious uveitis.

EXPERT OPINION

In case of dependency to steroids or sight-threatening disease, conventional immunosuppressive drugs (methotrexate, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil) and/or biological therapies such as anti-TNF alpha treatments (adalimumab, infliximab) can be used to achieve and maintain disease quiescence. Interferon is an efficient immunomodulatory drug that can be proposed as second-line therapy in specific indications (eg. refractory macular edema, sight-threatening Behçet's uveitis). Other biologics, especially tocilizumab, are showing promising results. Local treatments (steroids, sirolimus etc.) can be used as adjuvant therapies in case of unilateral relapse. Therapeutic response must always be evaluated by clinical examination and appropriate ancillary investigations.

Adalimumab Accounts for Long-Term Control of Noninfectious Uveitis Also in the Absence of Concomitant DMARD Treatment: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Objective

This study was aimed at assessing the long-term ocular control of adalimumab (ADA) in a large real-world population with noninfectious primary or secondary uveitis, focusing on the steroid-sparing effect and on disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) cotreatment.

Methods

In this retrospective, multicenter study, the efficacy of ADA was evaluated in terms of ocular control, changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corticosteroid-sparing effect, and drug retention rate, overall and stratified according to DMARD cotreatment.

Results

106 patients were included. 88.7% had an associated systemic disease. After 6 and 12 months, proportions of patients with effective ocular control were 83.7% and 83.3%, respectively. At last the follow-up, 94.6% of patients had satisfactory ocular control. No difference in terms of ocular control at all time points emerged among patients starting ADA for ocular vs. systemic involvements. Patients with poor baseline BCVA remained stable or improved, while those with good BCVA hardly worsened. At 6 and 12 months, the median dose of prednisone significantly reduced to 5 mg/day (0-5) and 2.5 mg/day (0-5) (p < 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 36 months, 38 subjects discontinued ADA treatment. Mild to moderate side effects were reported in 7 patients (6.6%). ADA ocular control, corticosteroid-sparing effect, and drug retention rate were not influenced by the concomitant use of DMARDs.

Conclusion

The long-term ocular control of ADA in noninfectious primary or secondary uveitis is confirmed, also for BCVA preservation. Concomitant use of DMARDs does not provide additional benefits to ADA alone in terms of ocular control, steroid spare, and drug retention rate.

Behçet's syndrome as a tool to dissect the mechanisms of thrombo-inflammation: clinical and pathogenetic aspects

Behçet's syndrome (BS) is a complex disease with different organ involvement. The vascular one is the most intriguing, considering the existence of a specific group of patients suffering from recurrent vascular events involving the venous and, more rarely, the arterial vessels. Several clinical clues suggest the inflammatory nature of thrombosis in BS, especially of the venous involvement, thus BS is considered a model of inflammation-induced thrombosis. Unique among other inflammatory conditions, venous involvement (together with the arterial one) is currently treated with immunosuppressants, rather than with anti-coagulants. Although many in-vitro studies have suggested the different roles of the multiple players involved in clot formation, in-vivo models are crucial to study this process in a physiological context. At present, no clear mechanisms describing the pathophysiology of thrombo-inflammation in BS exist. Recently, we focused our attention on BS patients as a human in-vivo model of inflammation-induced thrombosis to investigate a new mechanism of clot formation. Indeed, fibrinogen displays a critical role not only in inflammatory processes, but also in clot formation, both in the fibrin network and in platelet aggregation. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-derived modifications represent the main post-translational fibrinogen alterations responsible for structural and functional changes. Recent data have revealed that neutrophils (pivotal in the pathogenetic mechanisms leading to BS damage) promote fibrinogen oxidation and thrombus formation in BS. Altogether, these new findings may help understand the pathogenetic bases of inflammation-induced thrombosis and, more importantly, may suggest potential targets for innovative therapeutic approaches.