Physician-patient alignment in satisfaction with psoriatic arthritis treatment in Latin America

Burden of Disease in Psoriatic Arthritis in Latin America: a Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic inflammatory pathology that generates a substantial and progressive deterioration of functionality and quality of life. It is associated with comorbidities (cardiovascular and metabolic) and involvement of mental health. In Latin America, information regarding the disease is limited. This study reviews the burden of disease (disease activity, functional involvement, clinical manifestations, comorbidities, patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, and use of health resources) in PsA patients in Latin America.

METHODS

Systematic literature review of publications in PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews-CDSR/Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, LILACS, Scielo, Redalyc, conference abstracts, and grey literature. Two independent assessors selected studies and extracted information. Quality was assessed according to the type of study.

RESULTS

We identified 692 references, selecting 50 studies: 41 cross-sectional, four economic-studies, four cohort studies and one systematic review. The information comes mainly from Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico. The estimated disease prevalence for Latin America ranges from 0.004 to 0.08% (95% CI 0.02-0.20). Measurements with validated instruments suggest suboptimal assessment of disease domains, significant functional compromise, loss of productivity, and high frequency of comorbidities, including mental health. Methodological and population considerations limit the generalizability of the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The available information reports a considerable burden of disease in patients with PsA in Latin America, with involvement of quality of life associated with disability in relation to disease activity and its various manifestations. Future research and funding efforts should be aimed at generating more standardized information about the impact of PsA in the region. Key Points •The functional involvement related to disease activity, the impact on the quality of life, and the frequency of cardiometabolic and psychological comorbidities are remarkable in Latin American patients with PsA. •The current synthesis offers an overview of the burden of disease (disease activity, functional involvement, clinical manifestations, comorbidities, patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, and use of health resources) in PsA patients in Latin America. •Future research efforts and clinical strategies are required in order to generate standardized data on the patients and better estimate the burden of disease in the region.

Real-world evidence generation from patients, their caregivers and physicians supporting clinical, regulatory and guideline decisions: an update on Disease Specific Programmes

OBJECTIVE

To update on and describe the role of Disease Specific Programmes (DSPs), a multi-perspective real-world data (RWD) source, in the context of the evolution of the value and acceptance of real-world evidence (RWE) in clinical, regulatory and guideline decision-making.

METHODS

DSPs are multi-national, multi-subscriber, multi-therapy cross-sectional surveys incorporating retrospective data collection from patient, caregiver and physician perspectives. Information collected covers the patient journey, including treatment/prescribing patterns and rationale, patient-reported outcomes, impact on work and everyday activities, attitudes towards and perceptions of the condition, adherence to treatment and burden of illness. Published peer-reviewed DSP papers were aligned with current key RWE themes identified in the literature, alongside their contribution to RWE.

RESULTS

RWE themes examined were: using RWE to inform clinical practice, patient and caregiver engagement, RWE role in supporting health technology assessments and regulatory submissions, informing value-driven healthcare decisions, real-world patient subgroup differences and therapeutic inertia/unmet needs; highlighting patients' and caregivers' experience of living with a disease, disconnect from their physicians, unmet needs and educational gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

DSPs provide a wealth of RWD in addition to evidence generated by registries, clinical trials and observational research, with wide use for the pharmaceutical industry, government, funding/regulatory bodies, clinical practice guideline insights and, most importantly, informing improvements in people's lives. The depth, breadth and heritage of information collected via DSPs since 1995 is unparalleled, extending understanding of how diseases are managed by physicians in routine clinical practice and why treatment choices are made, patients' perceptions of their disease management, and caregiver burden.

Concurrent Presentation of Pustular Psoriasis and Late-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Diagnostic Challenge in a Community Hospital Setting

The coexistence of autoimmune diseases presents a significant diagnostic challenge in clinical practice, particularly in settings with limited resources. This case report details a rare instance of pustular psoriasis occurring concurrently with rheumatoid arthritis, underscoring the complexities involved in diagnosing overlapping autoimmune disorders. A 70-year-old male with a history of chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and other comorbidities presented to a rural community hospital with a year-long persistent rash and joint and back pain. Physical examination and blood tests revealed high inflammatory markers. A dermatological assessment, including a skin biopsy, diagnosed generalized pustular psoriasis. However, the atypical presentation of acute polyarthritis led to further investigations, revealing elevated rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibody levels, resulting in a diagnosis of late-onset rheumatoid arthritis. The patient underwent a comprehensive treatment regime, including prednisolone, cefazolin, oral terbinafine, methotrexate, and infliximab, leading to gradual symptom improvement to the previous activity of daily life and discharge on the 27th day of hospitalization. This case illustrates the diagnostic intricacies in identifying concurrent autoimmune disorders and highlights the crucial role of general physicians in systematically approaching complex cases in resource-limited settings. It emphasizes the need for heightened clinical vigilance and a multifaceted diagnostic approach when managing patients with overlapping rheumatic symptoms, advocating for consideration of coexisting conditions in autoimmune diseases.

Challenges in Diagnosing Psoriatic Arthritis in Primary Care: A Meta-Ethnographic Study

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex and debilitating chronic inflammatory joint disorder that is often associated with psoriasis and presents significant challenges in its early diagnosis and management. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the diagnostic intricacies of PsA in primary care settings to shed light on the prevalence, barriers, and implications of delayed diagnosis. To achieve our research objectives, we conducted a qualitative synthesis using the meta-ethnographic method, which is a robust approach for synthesizing qualitative data. We systematically searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases for relevant articles using predefined search terms such as "psoriatic arthritis," "diagnosis," and "primary care." The inclusion criteria were narrative articles in English that provided insights into the diagnostic challenges of PsA in primary care. Conference presentations, original articles, and duplicate articles were excluded. Our analysis revealed four key themes that elucidated the multifaceted nature of PsA diagnosis in primary care: (1) a variety of initial and non-specific symptoms, highlighting the diverse clinical presentations that can mimic other conditions; (2) the lack of experience with PsA among primary care professionals, underscoring the importance of education and training; (3) the lack of skin lesions, which can complicate diagnosis when not present; and (4) a delay in diagnosis, with potentially severe consequences for patients' health and quality of life. This study highlights the challenges inherent in the diagnosis of PsA in primary care settings. The multifaceted nature of the disease, coupled with limited experience among primary care providers, often results in delayed diagnosis and subsequent treatment initiation. Early recognition and intervention are pivotal for optimizing patient outcomes. Addressing these challenges necessitates a comprehensive approach involving heightened clinical suspicion, continuous medical education, interdisciplinary collaboration, and utilization of standardized diagnostic criteria. Collaboration between primary care physicians and specialists is crucial for enhancing the accuracy and timeliness of PsA diagnosis and ultimately improving patient well-being and quality of life.

Difficult to treat psoriatic arthritis - how should we manage?

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, multi-domain immune-mediated inflammatory arthritis with a high disease burden. PsA patients have significant co-morbidities like obesity, depression, fibromyalgia which can impact disease activity assessment. The management of PsA has undergone a paradigm shift over the last decade due to the availability of multiple biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Despite the availability of multiple therapeutic agents, it is not uncommon to find patients not responding adequately and continuing to have active disease and/or high disease burden. In our review, we propose what is "difficult to treat PsA", discuss differential diagnosis, commonly overlooked factors, co-morbidities that affect treatment responses, and suggest a stepwise algorithm to manage these patients.

Challenges in the Management of Psoriatic Arthritis in Latin America: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

In 2020, the International League of Associations for Rheumatology published recommendations for managing psoriatic arthritis (PsA), aiming to adapt the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations to low-income countries. At that time, the paucity of clinical studies examining the management of patients with PsA in Latin America was remarked on by the international working group. Therefore, the primary objective of this systematic literature review was to investigate the main challenges in managing PsA in Latin America as described in recent publications.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of trials reporting at least one challenge/difficulty in the management of PsA in Latin America was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. References published in the PubMed, EMBASE, and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature) databases between 1980 and February 2023 were included. The selection of references was conducted independently by 2 researchers in the Rayyan Qatar Computing Research Institute program. Two other reviewers independently extracted data. All challenges were noted and categorized into domains. Data analysis was descriptive.

FINDINGS

The search strategy yielded 2085 references, with 21 studies included in the final analysis. Most studies were conducted in Brazil (66.6%; n = 14) and were observational studies (100%; N = 21). Difficulties faced by PsA patients and physicians included the high incidence of opportunistic infections (described in 42.8% of the publications; n = 9), followed by nonadherence to therapy, discordance between patients and physicians regarding remission rates, low drug persistence, limited access to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, issues related to the storage of biologic drugs, elevated cost of biologic drugs, limited access to medical care, diagnostic delay, and the individual- and country-level impact of socioeconomic factors on work- and health-related outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS

Challenges in the management of PsA in Latin America extend beyond the care of opportunistic infections, encompassing several other socioeconomic factors. More research is needed to better understand the peculiarities of treating PsA in Latin America to improve patient care. PROSPERO identifier: CRD42021228297.

Patients with spondyloarthritis including psoriatic arthritis: Current needs, impact, and perspective

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the current needs of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and the impact of the conditions.

METHODS

National survey in electronic format for patients with SpA and PsA. The survey was launched on April 28, 2021, using the channels of the Coordinadora Española de Asociaciones de Espondiloartritis (Spanish Coordinator of Associations of Spondyloarthritis) to communicate with members and followers, and was closed on June 30, 2021. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected (age, sex, disease duration, treatments), and variables related to the objectives. A descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 543 patients with SpA and 291 with PsA were included. In the previous month, on a scale from 0 to 10 (0: none; 10: very high) the mean scores of fatigue, morning stiffness, and sleep problems were all >8. Almost 80% of the patients with SpA reported low back pain and 82.5% of the patients with PsA reported involvement of the knees, ankles, feet and/or hands, and 51% dactylitis. The level of satisfaction with the treatment was low, mean 5.5 in SpA and 6.2 in PsA (scale 0-10). It was higher with biological therapies. We found that 70.2% of patients with SpA and 66% with PsA were used to living with pain every day. Finally, 43.8% of participants with SpA and 31.2% of those with PsA reported that they did not set the treatment goals with their doctors.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently the impact of SpA and PsA on multiple aspects of daily life is still very high. There are areas for improvement in the doctor-patient relationship and in treatments.

Real world effectiveness and satisfaction with secukinumab in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis: a population survey in five European countries

OBJECTIVES

To describe the effectiveness of secukinumab in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and associated physician satisfaction with secukinumab treatment, in routine clinical practice across five European countries.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of PsA patients receiving secukinumab for ≥4 months in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK from March to December 2018. Data based on physician-completed questionnaires at initiation of treatment and at the data collection consultation were collected and used to assess effectiveness.

RESULTS

572 PsA patients with a mean age of 47.9 years, 57.0% were male, with 5.6% of patients with mild, 55.2% with moderate and 38.1% severe PsA prior to treatment initiation were included. 33.0% of patients received a dosage of 150 mg and 67.0% a dosage of 300 mg secukinumab. Around 84% of patients received secukinumab for 6 months or longer. Symptoms seen at current assessment in over 20% of patients were tender or swollen joints or psoriatic skin lesions. Between initiation of treatment and the current consultation, improvements in skin, joint and overall severity were reported. Physician satisfaction with secukinumab's ability to control disease was very high during the study period, greater than 90%, and was seen irrespective of disease severity at initiation, prior biologic use, treatment duration, time since diagnosis or onset of symptoms, treatment history, and BMI.

CONCLUSION

Physicians were satisfied with the ability of secukinumab to control disease and it was effective in the treatment of PsA patients in routine clinical settings.

Disease activity indices in psoriatic arthritis: current and evolving concepts

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a highly heterogenous disease, with many different clinical manifestations inside or outside of the musculoskeletal system and the skin. It is often accompanied by comorbidities like cardiovascular diseases and mental health disorders. Acute phase reactants are not always elevated and specific markers for diagnosis and/or monitor the disease are lacking thus far. These characteristics possibly reflect the difficulty in agreement about a disease activity index for PsA. Many indices have been proposed over the last years, each of them considering different combinations of disease characteristics. We performed a literature search for relevant articles using PubMed and Embase. No data limits were applied. The keywords "Psoriatic arthritis" OR "PsA" AND "disease activity" AND "index" OR "indices" were used. Reference lists of relevant articles were also reviewed. Articles were also identified through searches of the authors' own files. In this review, we comparatively present the available indices (simple or composite) used for measuring activity in PsA, highlighting their weaknesses, strengths, and disparities. We comment also on the caveats and pitfalls that are encountered in assessment of disease activity, in relation to clinical practice and research. A widely accepted index for measuring disease activity in PsA is lacking. Other parameters, mostly related to patient-reported outcomes and to novel biomarkers might be included in the future, in such indices. Key points • Disease activity in PsA is multiparametric and its assessment is challenging due to many different phenotypes. • Many different indices are currently in use of PsA disease activity assessment. • Each PsA disease activity index has specific pros and cons.

Gaps in moderate plaque psoriasis management: A survey of Saudi dermatologists

Background:

There are many barriers that usually lead to under-treatment of moderate psoriasis patients, with subsequent unsatisfactory results and clinical outcomes.

Objective:

Given this lack of consistent guidelines on treating moderate plaque psoriasis patients, the aim of the current study is to define how Saudi dermatologists define and treat such cases in the real-world clinical setting.

Methods:

We conducted an online cross-sectional survey from May 2020 to October 2020, involving all eligible dermatologists working at different academic, governmental, and private sectors in Saudi Arabia.

Results:

Finally, a total of 260 dermatologists were included in the final analysis; out of them, 140 (53.8%) were males and 120 (46.2%) were females. Regarding the tools used by participating dermatologists for diagnosis of moderate psoriasis, most of the participants (86.5%) used Body Surface Area (BSA), 7.3% used Physician Global Assessment (PGA), and 6.2% used Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Cutoff scores for defining moderate psoriasis varied widely among surveyed dermatologists. The surveyed dermatologists reported that 46% of their patients with moderate plaque psoriasis were receiving biologics as their primary therapy, while 24.1% were receiving prescription topical treatment, 20.3% were receiving an oral systemic therapy, 4.9% were using over-the-counter topical treatment, and 4.7% were receiving phototherapy.

Conclusion:

There is a pervasive lack of consensus regarding the definition of moderate psoriasis, with reported wide ranges among the commonly used severity tools in psoriasis patients.