Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide therapy for Henoch schonlein purpura nephritis in children: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety between glucocorticoids combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus glucocorticoids combined with cyclophosphamide (CTX) for henoch schonlein purpura nephritis (HSPN) in children.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database were searched from the inception to April 5th, 2024. Eligible studies comparing glucocorticoids combined with MMF versus glucocorticoids combined with CTX for HSPN in children were included. Data were analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.3.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 non-randomized studies involving 675 patients were identified. Compared with CTX therapeutic schedule, MMF therapeutic schedule had a higher complete remission (CR) within the 6 months (OR 1.61, 95%CI 1.16-2.22, P = .004) and CR within the 12 months (OR 1.73, 95%CI 1.00-2.97, P = .05). However, there was no significant difference between MMF and CTX therapeutic schedule concerning total remission (TR) within the 6 months (OR 1.54, 95%CI 0.82-2.92, P = .18) and TR within the 12 months (OR 2.08, 95%CI 0.86-5.01, P = .10). In addition, incidences of gastrointestinal discomfort (OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.19-0.56, P < .0001), liver function injury (OR 0.28, 95%CI 0.09-0.87, P = .03), myelosuppression (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.06-0.41, P = .0001), alopecia (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.07-0.91, P = .03) in MMF therapeutic schedule were all lower than CTX therapeutic schedule. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 therapeutic schedules concerning infection (OR 0.90, 95%CI 0.50-1.61, P = .72), rash (OR 0.38, 95%CI 0.07-2.04, P = .26).

CONCLUSION

Glucocorticoids combined with MMF had a higher CR and lower incidence of adverse effects compared with glucocorticoids combined with CTX in the treatment of HSPN in children.

A Review of Myositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

There is a well-established relationship between different subsets of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs, myositis) and interstitial lung disease (ILD), with lung complications sometimes presenting prior to myopathic manifestations. The subtypes of myositis include those that are strongly associated with ILD, such as polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM). Research has shown that in certain patients, these can then be further divided into subtypes using myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs), which are specific for myositis, and myositis-associated antibodies (MAAs), which can be found in myositis in overlap syndromes with other connective tissue diseases (CTDs). Notably, certain MSAs and MAAs are associated with ILD in patients with myositis. The clinical presentations of ILD in patients with myositis can vary widely and can be insidious in onset and difficult to diagnose. As ILD can progress rapidly in some cases, it is essential that clinicians are able to identify and diagnose ILD in patients with myositis. For this reason, the aim of this review is to highlight the clinical features, diagnostic criteria, important histopathologic, laboratory, and radiographic features, and treatment modalities for those patients with myositis-associated ILD.

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for autoimmune disease-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressants, biologic agents, antifibrotic drugs, and other drugs can be used to treat autoimmune disease-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), but the preferred treatment is uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple drugs in the treatment of autoimmune disease-associated ILD.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2023. Primary outcomes were percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (FVC% predicted) and discontinuations for adverse events (AEs). We estimated summary mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs) using network meta-analysis with fixed effects.

RESULTS

The analysis is based on 15 RCTs involving 1832 patients. In terms of FVC% predicted, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (MD 1.27, 95 % credible interval [CrI] 0.08 to 2.43), cyclophosphamide (1.89, 0.10 to 3.68), rituximab (9.29, 2.79 to 15.80), tocilizumab (6.30, 3.27 to 9.34), nintedanib (1.71, 0.54 to 2.88), pirfenidone (2.03, 0.65 to 3.40) and nintedanib+MMF (2.43, 0.95 to 3.89) were more effective than placebo. Analysis based on a small sample size showed that riociguat also had good therapeutic potential when compared with placebo. By contrast, bosentan and pomalidomide showed no significant difference compared with placebo. Regarding discontinuations for AEs, nintedanib (OR 2.09, 95 %CrI 1.20 to 3.73) and pirfenidone (3.46, 1.31 to 10.56) were associated with higher dropout rates than placebo, and the combination therapy of nintedanib+MMF did not increase the risk of AEs compared with nintedanib monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, tocilizumab, nintedanib and pirfenidone are effective in the treatment of autoimmune disease-associated ILD. The efficacy of riociguat and the superiority of combination therapy need to be demonstrated in more RCTs. The tolerance of nintedanib and pirfenidone is a concern, but most of their AEs are mild and controllable.

Absence of interstitial lung disease at initial visit may predict a favorable outcome for Japanese patients with systemic sclerosis with anti-topoisomerase I antibody

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is recognized a prognostic factor and leading cause of death in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of the present study is to clarify factors at an initial visit that are associated with the deterioration of ILD in SSc patients with anti-topoisomerase I (anti-topo I) antibodies. This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Fifty-three consecutive SSc patients with anti-topo I antibodies were included in this study. Of the 53 patients, 43 had ILD at their initial visit, whereas 10 did not. We examined the clinical and immunological factors at an initial visit that were associated with the deterioration of ILD. The deterioration of ILD was defined as the administration of intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY) therapy. In this cohort, 45 (85%) patients had ILD at the time of the final observation, and only two who did not have ILD at their initial visit developed ILD during the follow-up period. Until the final observation, 26 (49%) patients received IVCY therapy for the progression of ILD. The age at onset, disease duration, SSc subtype, and skin score were similar between patients with and those without IVCY therapy. Approximately 60% (26 of 43) of patients with ILD at their initial visit received IVCY therapy. On the other hand, none of the 10 patients without ILD at their initial visit received IVCY therapy. Our multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression model revealed that the presence of ILD at an initial visit was an independent factor associated with the introduction of IVCY therapy (odds ratio, 2.8e+7 [95% confidence interval, 1.8e+17-uncalculated], p = 0.0048). Although anti-topo I antibodies are strongly associated with ILD, it was unlikely for SSc patients with anti-topo I antibodies to receive IVCY therapy when they did not have ILD at an initial visit.

Skin disorders and interstitial lung disease: Part II-The spectrum of cutaneous diseases with lung disease association

Part 2 of this 2-part CME introduces dermatologists to noninfectious inflammatory skin diseases associated with pulmonary involvement. In many cases, dermatologists may be the first physicians recognizing respiratory complications associated with these diagnoses. Because pulmonary involvement is often the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, dermatologists should be comfortable screening and monitoring for lung disease in high-risk patients, recognizing cutaneous stigmata of lung disease in these patients and referring to pulmonary specialists, when appropriate, for prompt treatment initiation. Some treatments used for skin disease may not be appropriate in the context of lung disease and hence, choosing a holistic approach is important. Interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension are the most common pulmonary complications and a significant cause of mortality in autoimmune connective tissue diseases, especially systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis, and mixed connective tissue disease. Pulmonary complications, notably interstitial lung disease, are also common and life-threatening in sarcoidosis and vasculitis, while they are variable in neutrophilic and autoimmune blistering diseases.

Systemic Sclerosis Association with Malignancy

The association of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and cancer is well known from several decades suggesting common genetic and environmental risk factors involved in the development of both diseases. Immunosuppressive drugs widely used in SSc may increase the risk of cancer occurrence and different SSc clinical and serological features identify patients at major risk to develop malignancy. In this context, among serological features, presence of anti-RNA polymerase III and anti-topoisomerase I autoantibodies seems to increase cancer frequency in SSc patients (particularly lung and breast cancers). Lung fibrosis and a long standing SSc pulmonary involvement have been largely proposed as lung cancer risk factors, and the exposure to cyclophosphamide and an upper gastrointestinal involvement have been traditionally linked to bladder and oesophagus cancers, respectively. Furthermore, immune checkpoint inhibitors used for cancer therapy can induce immune-related adverse events, which are more frequent and severe in patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases such as SSc. The strong association between SSc and cancer occurrence steers clinicians to carefully survey SSc patients performing periodical malignancy screening. In the present review, the most relevant bilateral relationships between SSc and cancer will be addressed.

Pharmacological treatment for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung involvement: Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Background

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the most important pulmonary manifestation of connective tissue diseases (CTDs) since it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, there is uncertainty on what constitutes the optimal treatment options from a variety of competing interventions. The aim of the overview is to summarize existing evidence of the effectiveness and harm of pharmacological therapies for adults with CTD-ILD.

Methods

A literature search will be conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Health Technology Assessment database, Epistemonikos.org, KSR Evidence, and PROSPERO. We will search for systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis that examine pharmacological treatment for CTD-ILD. Updated supplemental search will also be undertaken to identify additional randomized controlled trials. The primary outcomes will be changes in lung function measures and adverse events. The methodological quality of the included reviews will be assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool. The overall quality of the evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE rating. Summarized outcome data extracted from systematic reviews will be described in narrative form or in tables. For each meta-analysis we will estimate the summary effect size by use of random-effects and fixed-effects models with 95% confidence intervals, the between-study heterogeneity expressed by I², and the 95% prediction interval. If feasible, given sufficient data, network meta-analysis will be conducted to combine direct and indirect evidence of class and agent comparisons.

Discussion

While many factors are crucial in selecting an appropriate treatment for patients with CTD-ILD, evidence for the efficacy and safety of a drug is essential in guiding this decision. Thus, this overview will aid clinicians in balancing the risks versus benefits of the available therapies by providing high-quality evidence to support informed decision-making and may contribute to future guideline development.

Systematic review registration

MedRxiv: DOI 10.1101/2022.01.25.22269807

PROSPERO: CRD42022303180

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of moderate to severe Graves' orbitopathy: a meta-analysis

The role of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) has attracted much attention. This study is to evaluate the benefit and safety of MMF in moderate-to-severe GO. A meta-analysis of clinical control trials comparing MMF (with or without glucocorticoid (GC)) for the treatment of GO with GC was conducted. We searched the databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), for articles published up to 15 June 2022. The primary outcome is referred to the improvement in overall response, and secondary outcomes included the change in clinical activity score (CAS) and adverse events (AEs). Of the 289 articles initially searched, 6 studies were finally eligible for inclusion. The results showed that MMF (with or without GC) was superior to GC in the treatment of GO (OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.17–5.14; p < 0.00001). Subgroup analyses also showed that MMF monotherapy was more effective than GC (OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.52–7.87; p < 0.00001). Compared to methylprednisolone (MP) monotherapy, a combination of MP and MMF was more effective. CAS decreased even more significantly (WMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.10–0.48; p = 0.002) and fewer AEs occurred (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.06–0.72; p = 0.01) in patients receiving MMF. The pooled data suggested that MMF treatment in GO might be promising. Compared with GC therapy, MMF is safer and more effective. However, more large-sample and high-quality studies targeting MMF use in GO patients and long-term surveillance of prognosis are urgently needed.

Management of Connective Tissue Disease-related Interstitial Lung Disease

Purpose of Review

This review aims to collate current evidence on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of various connective tissue disease (CTD)–associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILD) and present a contemporary framework for the management of such patients. It also seeks to summarize treatment outcomes including efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants, anti-fibrotics, and stem cell transplantation in CTD-ILD.

Recent Findings

Screening for ILD has been augmented by the use of artificial intelligence, ultra-low dose computerized tomography (CT) of the chest, and the use of chest ultrasound. Serum biomarkers have not found their way into clinical practice as yet. Identifying patients who need treatment and choosing the appropriate therapy is important to minimize the risk of therapy-related toxicity. The first-line drugs for systemic sclerosis (SSc) ILD include mycophenolate and cyclophosphamide. Nintedanib, an anti-fibrotic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for use in SSc-ILD. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved tocilizumab subcutaneous injection for slowing the rate of decline in pulmonary function in adult patients with SSc-ILD. Autologous stem cell transplantation may have a role in select cases of SSc-ILD.

Summary

CTD-ILD is a challenging area with diverse entities and variable outcomes. High-resolution CT is the investigative modality of choice. Treatment decisions need to be individualized and are based on patient symptoms, lung function, radiologic abnormalities, and the risk of disease progression. Precision medicine may play an important role in determining the optimal therapy for an individual patient in the future.

Case Report: Successful Treatment of Refractory Interstitial Lung Disease With Cyclosporine A and Pirfenidone in a Child With SLE

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) as an initial manifestation of lupus is rare, especially in young children. Here, we report a case of a 3-year-old boy who presented with fever, shortness of breath, and facial erythema. Clinical examination suggested a diagnosis of active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with butterfly rash, anemia, positive antinuclear antibody, positive anti-double-stranded DNA, and hypocomplementemia. On retrospective review of the patient’s records, multiple chest computed tomography (CT) images showed non-specific interstitial pneumonia + organizing pneumonia pattern, with no further autoimmune work-up during the visit to a respiratory department. In our opinion, persistent interstitial pneumonia may be a clue to connective tissue disease. The patient received steroid treatment for 1 year, and the radiological and immunological resolution was noted. However, he still suffered from cough and dyspnea. After a 1-year follow-up, he was hospitalized again for SLE relapse. While continuing corticosteroid therapy, the patient was given combination therapy consisting of cyclosporine A (CsA) and monthly-pulse cyclophosphamide for 6 months, and decreased proteinuria was noted. However, the patient’s respiratory symptoms and pulmonary radiologic findings did not improve significantly. With continued steroid therapy, the patient was started on a daily regimen of CsA and pirfenidone. Both drugs were sufficiently effective to allow gradual reduction of steroid dosage. After 2 years of treatment, marked improvements in symptoms, pulmonary function and chest CT images were observed. Our experience with this case emphasizes that prompt work-up for connective tissue disease (CTD) should be considered in young children with ILD, and pirfenidone might be a useful add-on therapy with immunosuppressive agents for refractory CTD-ILD in pediatric patients. Nevertheless, further clinical trials including larger numbers of patients need to assess the efficiency and safety of this combination therapy for refractory CTD-ILD.