Systemic Sclerosis Association with Malignancy

The association of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and cancer is well known from several decades suggesting common genetic and environmental risk factors involved in the development of both diseases. Immunosuppressive drugs widely used in SSc may increase the risk of cancer occurrence and different SSc clinical and serological features identify patients at major risk to develop malignancy. In this context, among serological features, presence of anti-RNA polymerase III and anti-topoisomerase I autoantibodies seems to increase cancer frequency in SSc patients (particularly lung and breast cancers). Lung fibrosis and a long standing SSc pulmonary involvement have been largely proposed as lung cancer risk factors, and the exposure to cyclophosphamide and an upper gastrointestinal involvement have been traditionally linked to bladder and oesophagus cancers, respectively. Furthermore, immune checkpoint inhibitors used for cancer therapy can induce immune-related adverse events, which are more frequent and severe in patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases such as SSc. The strong association between SSc and cancer occurrence steers clinicians to carefully survey SSc patients performing periodical malignancy screening. In the present review, the most relevant bilateral relationships between SSc and cancer will be addressed.

The emerging role of immunotherapy in biliary tract cancer: a review of new evidence and predictive biomarkers

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are frequently diagnosed in advanced stages and are highly lethal. Immunotherapy may play a role in the treatment of these patients. Promising results come from monotherapy or combination therapy studies in pretreated patients. In addition, several studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients. Numerous biomarkers have been investigated to define their predictive role in response to ICIs. However, the full extent of the benefit of immunotherapies has not yet been fully established and, except for high microsatellite instability status, no other biomarkers were uniquely predictive of response to ICIs.

Effect of systemic therapies or best supportive care after disease progression to both nivolumab and cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The Meet-Uro 19BEYOND study

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab and cabozantinib are currently approved agents in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but there are no data available for patients progressing to both treatments. The aim of this study was to compare active therapeutic options and best supportive care (BSC) after progression to nivolumab and cabozantinib in mRCC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we selected 50 patients from eight Italian centers. The primary endpoint of the study was the overall survival (OS) of patients on active treatment versus BSC. Secondary endpoints were the progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). The efficacy of active therapy was also investigated.

RESULTS

After progression to both nivolumab and cabozantinib, 57.1% of patients were given active treatment (mainly everolimus and sorafenib) while 42.9% received BSC. The median OS was 13 months (95% CI: 4-NR) in actively treated patients and 3 months (95% CI: 2-4) in BSC patients (p = 0.001). Patients treated with sorafenib had better disease control than those treated with everolimus (stable disease: 71.4% vs. 16.7%, progression disease: 14.3% vs. 58.3%; p = 0.03), with no significant differences in PFS (5 and 3 months, 95% CI: 1-6 vs. 2-5; p = 0.6) and OS (12 and 4 months, 95% CI: 3-NR vs. 2-NR; p = 0.2).

CONCLUSION

After treatment with both nivolumab and cabozantinib, the choice of a safe active systemic therapy offered better outcomes than BSC.

Occurrence of Dysgeusia in Patients Being Treated for Cancer

The aims of this study were to assess the presence of dysgeusia in patients receiving anticancer therapy and to explore possible factors influencing its occurrence. A total of 242 adult patients with histological diagnoses of malignant neoplasia and undergoing all types of anticancer treatment were included in the analysis. Data were collected from May 2019 to November 2019 at the Unit of Medical Oncology of Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy. Dysgeusia was assessed using the Chemotherapy-induced Taste Alteration Scale (CiTAS), while treatment-related symptoms were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Patients were aged 68 ± 13 years, mostly males (65%). A large proportion of them was undergoing chemotherapy (42.2%), while the others were receiving immunotherapy (20.7%), hormone therapy (15.5%), targeted therapy (12.8%), or a combination of them. Overall, 21.5% of patients reported dysgeusia, 17.4% nausea, 10.7% dysosmia, 9.9% xerostomia, 4.5% mucositis, and only 3.7% vomiting. The targeted therapy showed the greatest adverse effects, followed by chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and hormone therapy. When patients with dysgeusia were analyzed, phantogeusia and parageusia was the most affected dimension of gustatory disorders. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in CiTAS scores were found according to treatment-related symptoms for nausea and mucositis.

Association of Systemic Steroid Treatment and Outcome in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Real-World Analysis

Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are inflammatory side effects, which can occur during immune-checkpoint(s) inhibitors (ICIs) therapy. Steroids are the first-line agents to manage irAEs because of their immunosuppressive properties. However, it is still debated whether or when steroids can be administered without abrogating the therapeutic efforts of immunotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 146 patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with ICIs. We assessed the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients treated with steroids due to an irAE compared to a no-steroid group. Results: The early treatment with steroid (within the first 30 days from the beginning of immunotherapy) was not related to a shorter PFS (p = 0.077). Interestingly, patients who were treated with steroids after 30 days from the start of immunotherapy had significantly longer PFS (p = 0.017). In a multivariate analysis, treatment with steroids after 30 days was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR: 0.59 [95% CI 0.36–0.97], p = 0.037). Conclusions: This retrospective study points out that early systemic steroids administration to manage irAEs might not have a detrimental effect on patient clinical outcome in NSCLC, melanoma and RCC patients.

Beyond Conventional: The New Horizon of Targeted Therapy for the Treatment of Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

In the last few years the advent of targeted therapies against oncogenic drivers significantly improved the survival of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a favourable toxicity profile. Therefore, genetic testing, including at least EGFR mutations and ALK/ROS1 rearrangements, should be performed in all NSCLC patients (in particular with adenocarcinoma) who received a diagnosis of advanced disease. This review focuses on novel druggable oncogenic drivers, such as MET exon 14 mutations/MET amplification, RET fusions, BRAF V600E mutations, KRAS G12C mutations, NTRK rearrangements, and HER2 alterations.

Germline mutations in MSH2 and ATM gene in patients with GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumor) and second epitelial tumors

e23520

Background: In adult GISTs are frequently sporadic, while rarely GISTs are linked to Carney Triad and Carney-Stratakis Syndrome and NF1. GISTs with second primary tumors are reported in 4-33% of patients in literature and genetic counseling is suggested to explore an underlying germline mutations pathway. Methods: In our Academic Hospital Centre (EURACAN member) in Florence, Italy, we are following patients with GIST and multiple primary tumors with genetic counseling (72 GISTs with second tumors/185 patients with GIST) and germline analysis of the following genetic panel is performed as clinically indicated: BRCA1, BRCA2, MUTYH, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, CDH1, ATM, TP53, PTEN, CHECK2, PALB2, BARD1, BRIP1, BLM, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, PMS2, MRE11A, RAD50, NBN, FAM175A, EPKAM, TSK1, MEN1 by sequencing analysis with Illumina MiSeq by kit multiplicom BRCA Hereditary cancer Mastr plus, and bioinformatic analysis by software SOPHIADDM (Sophia genetics) for point genetic alterations of BRCA1 NM_007294.3, BRCA2 NM_000059.3, MUTYH NM_000249, MSH2 NM_000251, MSH6 NM_000179, CDH1 NM_00444360, ATM NM_000051, TP53 NM_000546, PTEN NM_000314, CHEK2 NM_001005735, PALB2 NM_024675, BARD1 NM_000465, BRIP1 NM_032043, BLM NM_000057, RAD51C NM_002876, RAD51D NM_001142571, XRCC2 NM_005431, PMS2 NM_000535, MRE11A NM_005590, RAD50 NM_006732, NBN NM_002485, FAM175A NM_139076, EPCAM NM_002354, STK1 NM_000455, MEN1 NM_000244 and MLPA (Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification) test analysis for patients with kit P087-BRCA1,P045-BRCA2(CHEK2, P248-MLH1-MSH2, P003-MLH1/MSH2, P072-MSH6-MUTYH (MRC-Holland). Results: In 3 patients germline mutations have been observed: 1 patient showed the c.1192dupG, p.(Ala398Glyfs*19) pathogenic mutation in exon 7 of MSH2 gene, confirmed by Sanger Sequencing, 1 patient showed c.565-?_1130+?del mutation consisting in heterozygous 3-4-5-6 exons deletion of MSH2 gene, confirmed by MLPA analysis, and in 1 patient the following ATM alteration has been identified in heterozygosis: ATM c.5319+2T > C, p.(?). In the 2 patients with Lynch syndrome with colon adenocarcinoma (MSI-H), synchronous GISTs (1 patient quadruple WT and 1 patient kit ex 11 mutated ) were diagnosed; in the patient with ATM mutation, the diagnosis of GIST (kit ex 11 mutated) occurred after prostate adenocarcinoma and before colon adenocarcinoma (MSI-H). Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that GIST diagnosis could be tumor-related to multiple hereditary tumor syndromes as Lynch Syndrome and Ataxia-Teleangectasia syndrome, the latter being linked in eterozygosis to tumor susceptibility to breast in female. This report represents a high value in terms of genetic counseling for relatives and in terms of therapeutic implications for the patients.

Darolutamide in hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer

Introduction: Important changes in the treatment of prostate cancer have taken place in recent years. Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) has been clinically delineated. In this setting, three drugs have been approved in high-risk disease: apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide.Areas covered:This manuscript aims to profile darolutamide, its clinical development, pharmacologic properties, efficacy and safety. We presented the results of published clinical studies, but we also investigated ongoing ones.Expert opinion: An indirect comparison with the other two aforementioned drugs emerged. While the clinical efficacy is comparable, the toxicity profile is different for darolutamide, resulting in greater tolerance. We must wait for the results of the trials that study darolutamide in hormone-sensitive disease, both in the metastatic phase and in the localized phase. Clinical experience will also be important to determine ever more personalized treatments for patients.

Active therapy or best supportive care after disease progression to both nivolumab and cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The BEYOND study (Meet-Uro 19)

319

Background: Nivolumab is approved in the second or further line of treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); cabozantinib is approved in a similar setting of patients. Unfortunately, no evidence is currently available regarding the best treatment option after disease progression to both nivolumab and cabozantinib. The aim of this study is to compare the treatment choices after progression to nivolumab and cabozantinib including patients followed in best supportive care (BSC) or active therapy. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we selected 42 patients from 8 Italian cancer centers. Enrolled patients had progressed to both nivolumab and cabozantinib and subsequently referred to active treatment or BSC. Primary endpoint of the study was the OS of patients on active treatment versus BSC. Secondary endpoints were ORR, PFS and OS of patients on active treatment who received sorafenib versus everolimus. Results: The median age was 65 years, 76.2% were male. The majority of patients had undergone nephrectomy (78.6%), had clear cell histology (83%) and were at intermediate-poor risk at the diagnosis (85.7%). The most frequent site of metastatic disease in the general population and in patients referred to BSC was the lung (73.8% and 88.9%, respectively). For patients referred to active treatment, the most frequent site of metastasis was bone (70.8%). Sunitinib (71.4%), nivolumab (64.3%), and cabozantinib (54.7%) were the most commonly used drugs in the I, II and III lines of treatment, respectively. After progression to both nivolumab and cabozantinib 42.9% of patients were referred to BSC, while 57.1% received active treatment (28.6% everolimus, 16.7% sorafenib, 4.8% sunitinib, 4.8% IL2-HD, 2.4% lenvatinib + everolimus). Median OS was 13 (95% CI: 4-NR) and 3 months (95% CI: 2-4) in patients on active treatment versus BSC ( p=0.001). Patients treated with sorafenib had better disease control when compared with those treated with everolimus (SD 71.4% versus 16.7%, PD 14.3% versus 58.3%; p=0.03), but no significant advantage in terms of PFS (5 versus 3 months, 95% CI: 2-6 versus 2-5; p= 0.5) and OS (NR versus 13 months, 95% CI: 3-NR versus 2-NR; p=0.2) was observed. Conclusions: After treatment with both nivolumab and cabozantinib, when possible, the choice of an active treatment seems to produce an OS advantage when compared with BSC. However, although sorafenib seems to demonstrate better results, we cannot indicate which is the drug of choice, as no significant advantage was shown in terms of OS or PFS from the comparison between sorafenib and everolimus. The limitations of this study are given by the size of the sample examined and its retrospective nature. Further studies are needed to confirm whether active treatment choice is associated with improved OS.

Absolute eosinophil count as predictive biomarker of irAEs in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)

345

Background: Nivolumab and ipilimumab are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and, to date, few biomarkers predictive of ICIs toxicity are reported in mRCC. Methods: We conducted a single-center, observational, retrospective study at Clinical Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy. We evaluated 43 patients (pts) with mRCC treated with ICIs from April 2013 to May 2020. Absolute Eosinophil Counts (AEC, N°/μL) were registered at baseline and at time of occurrence of irAEs. This study aims to evaluate whether the AEC could be a predictive biomarker of irAEs in patients with mRCC treated with ICIs. Results: Median age was 65 years and males were 81.4%. 10 pts received Nivolumab+Ipilimumab, while 33 pts received Nivolumab single agent. 74.4% pts (32/43) developed at least 1 irAE, 11.6% with G3-G4 irAEs. The most frequent first irAE was endocrine event (40.6% pts; 37.5% with hypo-/hyper-thyroidism). The baseline mean AEC was 163.1/μL in our cohort, in particular 132.2/μL in pts who did not develop irAEs and 176.7/μL in pts who developed irAEs (p=0.134). Among the pts who developed irAEs, the mean AEC was lower in pts with G1-G2 (153.1/μL) than in those with G3-G4 (330/μL; p=0.0013) irAEs. At the time of onset of the first irAE, the mean AEC increased to 247/μL (Δ 140.1%). Analyzing the trend of AEC from baseline to time of occurrence of irAE for the 32 pts who had developed at least one irAE, 53.1% (17 pts) showed an increasing trend; among these pts, the most frequent irAEs were endocrine occurring in 4/17 pts (23.6%). An increasing trend was also observed in the majority of pts who developed G1-2 (14/27, 51.9%) and G3-4 (3/5, 60.0%) irAEs. Additional analyzes are ongoing to identify appropriate cut-offs of AEC to better stratify patients. Conclusions: There is little evidence in the literature about the potential role of absolute eosinophil counts as a predictive biomarker of irAEs in patients with solid tumors treated with ICIs, and most refer to patients with melanoma. In this study we observed that the baseline AEC values in patients that will develop irAEs are higher than in those without irAEs and, among the former, the values are lower for patients with toxicity G1-G2 vs G3-G4. We also found an increase of the mean AEC from baseline to the onset of the first irAE. Of the patients who experience toxicity, most have an upward trend in AEC at the onset of the first irAE. Compatibly with all the limitations of a retrospective analysis, our is the first experience exploring the role of the eosinophil count in the development of irAEs in mRCC patients treated with ICIs, and a prospective study is ongoing in our Unit to confirm the role of the eosinophil count in patients treated with ICIs.

Clinical series of patients with cutaneous melanoma followed-up at the Novara Melanoma Centre from 1983 to 2009: description of the cohort and prognostic factors

AIM

The aim of this study was to review our experience with regards to patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed from 1983 to 2009, followed-up in our Dermatological Department of Novara.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 762 patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma in the Dermatological Department of Novara between 1983 and 2009 was conducted. Information was extracted from our melanoma patient database. The database included demographical, clinical and pathological variables of the patient. Clinical and pathological factors predicting survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier curves and the Log-Rank Test (univariate analysis).

RESULTS

Staging (American Joint Committee on Cancer 2001) of patients (P=0.000), Breslow thickness (P=0.000), primary ulceration and regression of the lesion (P=0.000), type of first (P<0.039) and second recurrence (P<0.011) were strongly correlated with overall and disease free survival. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was not correlated with disease free survival (P=0.153), it influences only overall survival (P=0.007) CONCLUSION: Our results confirms that sentinel node biopsy, Breslow thickness, ulceration, regression, staging, first and second recurrence are important variable for overall survival and disease free survival, sentinel lymph node status influence only overall survival instead.

[Transverse mesocolon herniation. Description of a clinical case]

A case of herniation of small bowel through a defect of the transverse meso-colon with secondary herniation through the gastrocolic ligament and re-entry into the greater peritoneal cavity is reported. This form of lesser sac hernia is rare and only one hundred half cases have been reported in literature.

[The autologous splenic reimplant in the rat]

In order to evaluate the clinical utility of autologous splenic transplantation in the omental pouch, a pneumococcal challenge was performed in 3 groups of rats, after demonstration of vitality of the intraperitoneal inoculum: Group A: splenectomized rats; Group B: reimplanted rats; Group C: sham operation. No statistically significant difference was found between the first two groups regarding resistance against infection (p less than 0.982), while normal rats proved more resistant (p less than 0.031). Between group A and B significant differences (p less than 0.001) exists only for a more precocious mortality in the first group. The poor clinical utility of the technique is demonstrated.