Inactivition of CDKL3 mildly inhibits proliferation of cells at VZ/SVZ in brain

The Impact of Mmu17 Non-Hsa21 Orthologous Genes in the Ts65Dn Mouse Model of Down Syndrome: The Gold Standard Refuted

BACKGROUND

Despite successful preclinical treatment studies to improve neurocognition in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome, translation to humans has failed. This raises questions about the appropriateness of the Ts65Dn mouse as the gold standard. We used the novel Ts66Yah mouse that carries an extra chromosome and the identical segmental Mmu16 trisomy as Ts65Dn without the Mmu17 non-Hsa21 orthologous region.

METHODS

Forebrains from embryonic day 18.5 Ts66Yah and Ts65Dn mice, along with euploid littermate controls, were used for gene expression and pathway analyses. Behavioral experiments were performed in neonatal and adult mice. Because male Ts66Yah mice are fertile, parent-of-origin transmission of the extra chromosome was studied.

RESULTS

Forty-five protein-coding genes mapped to the Ts65Dn Mmu17 non-Hsa21 orthologous region; 71%-82% are expressed during forebrain development. Several of these genes are uniquely overexpressed in Ts65Dn embryonic forebrain, producing major differences in dysregulated genes and pathways. Despite these differences, the primary Mmu16 trisomic effects were highly conserved in both models, resulting in commonly dysregulated disomic genes and pathways. Delays in motor development, communication, and olfactory spatial memory were present in Ts66Yah but more pronounced in Ts65Dn neonates. Adult Ts66Yah mice showed milder working memory deficits and sex-specific effects in exploratory behavior and spatial hippocampal memory, while long-term memory was preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that triplication of the non-Hsa21 orthologous Mmu17 genes significantly contributes to the phenotype of the Ts65Dn mouse and may explain why preclinical trials that used this model have unsuccessfully translated to human therapies.

Inhibition of CDKL3 downregulates STAT1 thus suppressing prostate cancer development

Prostate cancer poses a great threat to men's health worldwide, yet its treatment is still limited by the unclear understanding of its molecular mechanisms. CDKL3 is a molecule with a recently discovered regulatory role in human tumors, and its relationship with prostate cancer is unknown. The outcomes of this work showed that CDKL3 was significantly upregulated in prostate cancer tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues, and was significantly positively correlated with tumor malignancy. Knockdown of CDKL3 levels in prostate cancer cells significantly inhibited cell growth and migration and enhanced apoptosis and G2 arrest of the cell cycle. Cells with lower CDKL3 expression also had relatively weaker in vivo tumorigenic capacity as well as growth capacity. Exploration of downstream mechanisms of CDKL3 may regulate STAT1, which has co-expression characteristics with CDKL3, by inhibiting CBL-mediated ubiquitination of STAT1. Functionally, STAT1 is aberrantly overexpressed in prostate cancer and has a tumor-promoting effect similar to that of CDKL3. More importantly, the phenotypic changes of prostate cancer cells induced by CDKL3 were dependent on ERK pathway and STAT1. In summary, this work identifies CDKL3 as a new prostate cancer-promoting factor, which also has the potential to be a therapeutic target for prostate cancer.

Identification of CDKL3 as a critical regulator in development of glioma through regulating RRM2 and the JNK signaling pathway

Glioma is one of the most commonly diagnosed intracranial malignancies. The molecular mechanism underlying the development of glioma is still largely unknown. In this study, we present the first report concerning the function and mechanism of cyclin‐dependent kinase‐like 3 (CDKL3) in the development and prognosis of glioma. It is shown that CDKL3 was upregulated in glioma tissues and could independently predict poor prognosis of patients. Silencing CDKL3 in glioma cells could inhibit cell proliferation and migration and induce cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, whereas the overexpression of CDKL3 promoted cell proliferation. The in vivo experiments also indicated that knockdown of CDKL3 significantly suppressed tumor growth of glioma. Gene expression profiling of CDKL3 knockdown U87 cells identified RRM2 as a potential target of CDKL3, which was proved to have direct interaction with CDKL3. Given similar effects on glioma development with CDKL3, knockdown of RRM2 could rescue the effects of CDKL3 overexpression on glioma cells. Moreover, knockdown of CDKL3 or RRM2 suppressed the activity of JNK signaling, whereas CDKL3 overexpression produced the opposite effect. In conclusion, our results identified CDKL3 as a promotor for glioma, probably through the regulation of RRM2 and activation of the JNK signalling pathway, highlighting the significance of CDKL3 as a promising therapeutic target of glioma.