1
|
Zeng Q, Lu G, Yuan J, Ding J, Chen J, Gao X, Huang Y, Shi T, Yu H, Ni H, Li Y. Prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in patients with brain tumor undergoing craniotomy: a meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 2024; 45:1565-1580. [PMID: 37947983 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-07160-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain tumor patients undergoing craniotomy are significantly associated with the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE), while the contributing factors remains controversial. Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for VTE in postoperational brain tumor patients. METHODS We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to July 2023. Article selection, data extraction, and study quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's and Begg's tests. Stata 15.0 software was used for data analysis. RESULTS A total of 25 studies were considered, with a total of 49,620 brain tumor individuals. The pooled prevalence of VTE during hospitalization in postoperational brain tumor patients was 9% [95% CI: (0.08, 0.10)]. Moreover, our results demonstrated that patients with VTE were older than those without VTE [mean difference [MD] = 8.14, 95% CI: (4.97, 11.30)]. The following variables were significantly associated with VTE: prior history of VTE [OR = 7.81, 95% CI: (3.62, 16.88)], congestive heart failure [OR = 2.33, 95% CI: (1.08-5.05)], diabetes [OR = 1.87, 95% CI: (1.12-3.10)], hypertension [OR = 1.27, 95% CI: (1.07-1.50)], steroid use [OR = 1.63, 95% CI: (1.41, 1.88)], high white blood cells counts [MD = 0.32, 95% CI: (0.01, 0.63)], and high fibrinogen levels [MD = 0.19, 95% CI: (0.08, 0.30)]. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis identified risk factors for postoperational VTE in patients with brain tumor, which can serve as a theoretical foundation for medical staff to manage and treat VTE. TRIAL REGISTRATION CRD42023357459.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingping Zeng
- School of Nursing, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Department of Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Guangyu Lu
- School of Public Health, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Jing Yuan
- Department of Echocardiography, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China
| | - Jiali Ding
- School of Nursing, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Department of Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Juan Chen
- School of Nursing, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Department of Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Xianru Gao
- School of Nursing, Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Department of Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
| | - Yujia Huang
- Department of Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu, China
| | - Tian Shi
- Department of Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hailong Yu
- Department of Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
- Department of Neurology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China
| | - Hongbin Ni
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, School of Medicine, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Yuping Li
- Department of Neuro Intensive Care Unit, Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
- Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Pietro R, Zaccaro L, Marampon F, Tini P, De Felice F, Minniti G. The evolving role of reirradiation in the management of recurrent brain tumors. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:271-286. [PMID: 37624529 PMCID: PMC10522742 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04407-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Despite aggressive management consisting of surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and systemic therapy given alone or in combination, a significant proportion of patients with brain tumors will experience tumor recurrence. For these patients, no standard of care exists and management of either primary or metastatic recurrent tumors remains challenging.Advances in imaging and RT technology have enabled more precise tumor localization and dose delivery, leading to a reduction in the volume of health brain tissue exposed to high radiation doses. Radiation techniques have evolved from three-dimensional (3-D) conformal RT to the development of sophisticated techniques, including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic techniques, either stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Several studies have suggested that a second course of RT is a feasible treatment option in patients with a recurrent tumor; however, survival benefit and treatment related toxicity of reirradiation, given alone or in combination with other focal or systemic therapies, remain a controversial issue.We provide a critical overview of the current clinical status and technical challenges of reirradiation in patients with both recurrent primary brain tumors, such as gliomas, ependymomas, medulloblastomas, and meningiomas, and brain metastases. Relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate radiation technique and patient selection, the optimal radiation dose and fractionation, tolerance of the brain to a second course of RT, and the risk of adverse radiation effects have been critically discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella De Pietro
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucy Zaccaro
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Marampon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Tini
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Isernia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Soykut ED, Odabasi E, Sahin N, Tataroglu H, Baran A, Guney Y. Re-irradiation with stereotactic radiotherapy for recurrent high-grade glial tumors. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:361-369. [PMID: 37795399 PMCID: PMC10547398 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the radical treatments applied, recurrence is encountered in the majority of high-grade gliomas (HGG). There is no standard treatment when recurrence is detected, but stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is a preferable alternative. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy of SRT for recurrent HGG, and to investigate the factors that affect survival. Materials and methods From 2013 to 2021, a total of 59 patients with 64 lesions were re-irradiated in a single center with the CyberKnife Robotic Radiosurgery System. The primary endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and local control rates (LCR). Results The median time to first recurrence was 13 (4-85) months. SRT was performed as a median prescription dose of 30 Gy (range 15-30), with a median of 5 fractions (1-5). The median follow-up time was 4 months (range 1-57). The median OS was 8 (95% CI: 4.66-11.33) months. Age, grade 3, tumor size were associated with better survival. The median PFS was 5 [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.39-6.60] months. Age, grade 3 and time to recurrence > 9 months were associated with improved PFS. Grade 3 gliomas (p = 0.027), size of tumor < 2 cm (p = 0.008) remained independent prognostic factors for OS in multivariate analysis. Conclusion SRT is a viable treatment modality with significant survival contribution. Since it may have a favorable prognostic effect on survival in patients with tumor size < 2 cm, we recommend early diagnosis of recurrence and a decision to re-irradiate a smaller tumor during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ela Delikgoz Soykut
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Türkiye
| | - Eylem Odabasi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Türkiye
| | - Nilgun Sahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Türkiye
| | - Hatice Tataroglu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Türkiye
| | - Ahmet Baran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Türkiye
| | - Yildiz Guney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kalita O, Kazda T, Reguli S, Jancalek R, Fadrus P, Slachta M, Pospisil P, Krska L, Vrbkova J, Hrabalek L, Smrcka M, Lipina R. Effects of Reoperation Timing on Survival among Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients: A Retrospective Multicentric Descriptive Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092530. [PMID: 37173996 PMCID: PMC10177480 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma inevitably recurs, but no standard regimen has been established for treating this recurrent disease. Several reports claim that reoperative surgery can improve survival, but the effects of reoperation timing on survival have rarely been investigated. We, therefore, evaluated the relationship between reoperation timing and survival in recurrent GBM. A consecutive cohort of unselected patients (real-world data) from three neuro-oncology cancer centers was analyzed (a total of 109 patients). All patients underwent initial maximal safe resection followed by treatment according to the Stupp protocol. Those meeting the following criteria during progression were indicated for reoperation and were further analyzed in this study: (1) The tumor volume increased by >20-30% or a tumor was rediscovered after radiological disappearance; (2) The patient's clinical status was satisfactory (KS ≥ 70% and PS WHO ≤ gr. 2); (3) The tumor was localized without multifocality; (4) The minimum expected tumor volume reduction was above 80%. A univariate Cox regression analysis of postsurgical survival (PSS) revealed a statistically significant effect of reoperation on PSS from a threshold of 16 months after the first surgery. Cox regression models that stratified the Karnofsky score with age adjustment confirmed a statistically significant improvement in PSS for time-to-progression (TTP) thresholds of 22 and 24 months. The patient groups exhibiting the first recurrence at 22 and 24 months had better survival rates than those exhibiting earlier recurrences. For the 22-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.27, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.036. For the 24-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.25, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.039. Patients with the longest survival were also the best candidates for repeated surgery. Later recurrence of glioblastoma was associated with higher survival rates after reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondrej Kalita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Science, Faculty of Humanities, T. Bata University in Zlin, Stefanikova 5670, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Stefan Reguli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Radim Jancalek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Pekarska 664/53, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Fadrus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marek Slachta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Pospisil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lukas Krska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Vrbkova
- Institute of Molecular and Translate Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, Hnevotinska 133/5, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Lumir Hrabalek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Smrcka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Radim Lipina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prajapati HP, Ansari A. Updates in the Management of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2023; 84:174-187. [PMID: 35772723 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is the most aggressive and diffusely infiltrative primary brain tumor. Recurrence is almost universal even after all primary standard treatments. This article aims to review the literature and update the standard treatment strategies for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS A systematic search was performed with the phrase "recurrent glioblastoma and management" as a search term in PubMed central, Medline, and Embase databases to identify all the articles published on the subject till December 2020. The review included peer-reviewed original articles, clinical trials, review articles, and keywords in title and abstract. RESULTS Out of 513 articles searched, 73 were included in this review after screening for eligibility. On analyzing the data, most of the studies report a median overall survival (OS) of 5.9 to 11.4 months after re-surgery and 4.7 to 7.6 months without re-surgery. Re-irradiation with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) result in a median OS of 10.2 months (range: 7.0-12 months) and 9.8 months (ranged: 7.5-11.0 months), respectively. Radiation necrosis was found in 16.6% (range: 0-24.4%) after SRS. Chemotherapeutic agents like nitrosourea (carmustine), bevacizumab, and temozolomide (TMZ) rechallenge result in a median OS in the range of 5.1 to 7.5, 6.5 to 9.2, and 5.1-13.0 months and six months progression free survival (PFS-6) in the range of 13 to 17.5%, 25 to 42.6%, and 23 to 58.3%, respectively. Use of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors results in a median OS in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 months and PFS-6 in 13%. CONCLUSION Although recurrent glioblastoma remains a fatal disease with universal mortality, the literature suggests that a subset of patients may benefit from maximal treatment efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanuman Prasad Prajapati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ahmad Ansari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Safai, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Impact of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy on activity of daily living and performance status in progressive/recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective study. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:201. [PMID: 36474245 PMCID: PMC9727986 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02169-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is poor, with limited options of palliative localized or systemic treatments. Survival can be improved by a second localized treatment; however, it is not currently possible to identify which patients would benefit from this approach. This study aims to evaluate which factors lead to a lower Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score after fractionated stereotactic RT (fSRT). METHODS We retrospectively collected data from patients treated with fSRT for recurrent GBM at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine between October 2010 and November 2017 and analyzed which factors were associated with a lower KPS score. RESULTS 59 patients received a dose of 25 Gy in 5 sessions spread over 5-7 days (80% isodose). The median time from the end of primary radiotherapy to the initiation of fSRT was 10.7 months. The median follow-up after fSRT initiation was 8.8 months. The incidence of KPS and ADL impairment in all patients were 51.9% and 37.8% respectively with an adverse impact of PTV size on KPS (HR = 1.57 [95% CI 1.19-2.08], p = 0.028). Only two patients showed early grade 3 toxicity and none showed grade 4 or late toxicity. The median overall survival time, median overall survival time after fSRT, median progression-free survival and institutionalization-free survival times were 25.8, 8.8, 3.9 and 7.7 months, respectively. Initial surgery was associated with better progression-free survival (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.48 [95% CI 0.27-0.86], p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS A larger PTV should predicts lower KPS in the treatment of recurrent GBM using fSRT.
Collapse
|
7
|
Leone A, Colamaria A, Fochi NP, Sacco M, Landriscina M, Parbonetti G, de Notaris M, Coppola G, De Santis E, Giordano G, Carbone F. Recurrent Glioblastoma Treatment: State of the Art and Future Perspectives in the Precision Medicine Era. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10081927. [PMID: 36009473 PMCID: PMC9405902 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10081927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Current treatment guidelines for the management of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) are far from definitive, and the prognosis remains dismal. Despite recent advancements in the pharmacological and surgical fields, numerous doubts persist concerning the optimal strategy that clinicians should adopt for patients who fail the first lines of treatment and present signs of progressive disease. With most recurrences being located within the margins of the previously resected lesion, a comprehensive molecular and genetic profiling of rGBM revealed substantial differences compared with newly diagnosed disease. In the present comprehensive review, we sought to examine the current treatment guidelines and the new perspectives that polarize the field of neuro-oncology, strictly focusing on progressive disease. For this purpose, updated PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for pivotal studies and clinical trials published in the last five years. A total of 125 articles discussing locoregional management, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy strategies were included in our analysis, and salient findings were critically summarized. In addition, an in-depth description of the molecular profile of rGBM and its distinctive characteristics is provided. Finally, we integrate the above-mentioned evidence with the current guidelines published by international societies, including AANS/CNS, EANO, AIOM, and NCCN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto Leone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Nicola Pio Fochi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Sacco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Riuniti Hospital, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Landriscina
- Unit of Medical
Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical
Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Matteo de Notaris
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Rummo” Hospital, 82100 Benevento, Italy
| | - Giulia Coppola
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Elena De Santis
- Department of Anatomical Histological Forensic Medicine and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Guido Giordano
- Unit of Medical
Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical
Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Francesco Carbone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ziu M, Goyal S, Olson JJ. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of radiation therapy in the management of progressive and recurrent glioblastoma in adults. J Neurooncol 2022; 158:255-264. [PMID: 34748120 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03857-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients (18 years of age and above) with progressive/recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (pGBM) after first line combined multimodality treatment. QUESTION Can re-irradiation (by using conventional radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery) be used in patients with pGBM after the first adjuvant combined multimodality treatment with radiation and chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION Level III: When the target tumor is amenable for additional radiation, re-irradiation is recommended as it provides improved local tumor control, as measured by best imaging response. Such re-irradiation can take the form of conventional fractionation radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery. LEVEL III Re-Irradiation is recommended in order to maintain or improve a patient's neurological status and quality of life prior to any further tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateo Ziu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA.
- Radiation Oncology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Neurosciences, 3300 Gallows Rd, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
| | - Sharad Goyal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA
- Radiation Oncology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA
- Radiation Oncology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Germano IM, Johnson DR, Patrick HH, Goodman AL, Ziu M, Ormond DR, Olson JJ. Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Management of Progressive Glioblastoma in Adults: Update of the 2014 Guidelines. Neurosurgery 2022; 90:e112-e115. [PMID: 35426875 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Institute of Medicine best practice recommendation to review guidelines every 5 years is followed by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Guidelines Committee. The aim of this work was to provide an updated literature review and evidence-based recommendations on the topic of diagnosis and treatment of patients with progressive glioblastoma (pGBM). OBJECTIVE To review the literature published since the last guidelines on pGBM dated 2014, with literature search ending in June 2012. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for the period July 1, 2012, to March 31, 2019, using search terms and search strategies to identify pertinent abstracts. These were then screened using published exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify full-text review articles. Evidence tables were constructed using data derived from full-text reviews and recommendations made from the evidence derived. RESULTS From the total 8786 abstracts identified by the search, 237 full-text articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in this update. Two new level II recommendations derived from this work. For the diagnosis of patients with GBM, the use of diffusion-weighted images is recommended to be included in the magnetic resonance images with and without contrast used for surveillance to detect pGBM. For the treatment of patients with pGBM, repeat cytoreductive surgery is recommended to improve overall survival. An additional 21 level III recommendations were provided. CONCLUSION Recent published literature provides new recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of pGBM. The Central Nervous System Guidelines Committee will continue to pursue timely updates to further improve the care of patients with diagnosis.https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/guidelines-management-of-progressive-glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle M Germano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Derek R Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Hayes H Patrick
- Department of Neurological Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Abigail L Goodman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mateo Ziu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Neuroscience and Spine Institute Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| | - D Ryan Ormond
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Radiotherapy versus combination radiotherapy-bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:1921-1934. [PMID: 33796887 PMCID: PMC8195900 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04794-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background High-grade gliomas (HGG) comprise the most common primary adult brain cancers and universally recur. Combination of re-irradiation therapy (reRT) and bevacizumab (BVZ) therapy for recurrent HGG is common, but its reported efficacy is mixed. Objective To assess clinical outcomes after reRT ± BVZ in recurrent HGG patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), hypofractionated radiosurgery (HFSRT), or fully fractionated radiotherapy (FFRT). Methods We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We identified studies reporting outcomes for patients with recurrent HGG treated via reRT ± BVZ. Cohorts were stratified by BVZ treatment status and re-irradiation modality (SRS, HFSRT, and FFRT). Outcome variables were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and radiation necrosis (RN). Results Data on 1399 patients was analyzed, with 954 patients receiving reRT alone and 445 patients receiving reRT + BVZ. All patients initially underwent standard-of-care therapy for their primary HGG. In a multivariate analysis that adjusted for median patient age, WHO grade, RT dosing, reRT fractionation regimen, time between primary and re-irradiation, and re-irradiation target volume, BVZ therapy was associated with significantly improved OS (2.51, 95% CI [0.11, 4.92] months, P = .041) but no significant improvement in PFS (1.40, 95% CI [− 0.36, 3.18] months, P = .099). Patients receiving BVZ also had significantly lower rates of RN (2.2% vs 6.5%, P < .001). Conclusions Combination of reRT + BVZ may improve OS and reduce RN rates in recurrent HGG, but further controlled studies are needed to confirm these effects. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-04794-3.
Collapse
|
11
|
De Maria L, Terzi di Bergamo L, Conti A, Hayashi K, Pinzi V, Murai T, Lanciano R, Burneikiene S, Buglione di Monale M, Magrini SM, Fontanella MM. CyberKnife for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:652646. [PMID: 33854978 PMCID: PMC8039376 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Possible treatment strategies for recurrent malignant gliomas include surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combined treatments. Among different reirradiation modalities, the CyberKnife System has shown promising results. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis to establish the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife treatment for recurrent malignant gliomas. METHODS We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from 2000 to 2021 for studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of CyberKnife treatment for recurrent WHO grade III and grade IV gliomas of the brain. Two independent reviewers selected studies and abstracted data. Missing information was requested from the authors via email correspondence. The primary outcomes were median Overall Survival, median Time To Progression, and median Progression-Free Survival. We performed subgroup analyses regarding WHO grade and chemotherapy. Besides, we analyzed the relationship between median Time To Recurrence and median Overall Survival from CyberKnife treatment. The secondary outcomes were complications, local response, and recurrence. Data were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS Thirteen studies reporting on 398 patients were included. Median Overall Survival from initial diagnosis and CyberKnife treatment was 22.6 months and 8.6 months. Median Time To Progression and median Progression-Free Survival from CyberKnife treatment were 6.7 months and 7.1 months. Median Overall Survival from CyberKnife treatment was 8.4 months for WHO grade IV gliomas, compared to 11 months for WHO grade III gliomas. Median Overall Survival from CyberKnife treatment was 4.4 months for patients who underwent CyberKnife treatment alone, compared to 9.5 months for patients who underwent CyberKnife treatment plus chemotherapy. We did not observe a correlation between median Time To Recurrence and median Overall Survival from CyberKnife. Rates of acute neurological and acute non-neurological side effects were 3.6% and 13%. Rates of corticosteroid dependency and radiation necrosis were 18.8% and 4.3%. CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation of recurrent malignant gliomas with the CyberKnife System provides encouraging survival rates. There is a better survival trend for WHO grade III gliomas and for patients who undergo combined treatment with CyberKnife plus chemotherapy. Rates of complications are low. Larger prospective studies are warranted to provide more accurate results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucio De Maria
- Unit of Neurosurgery, University of Brescia and ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Alfredo Conti
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna and IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche, Bologna, Italy
| | - Kazuhiko Hayashi
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Valentina Pinzi
- Unit of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Taro Murai
- Unit of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Minniti G, Niyazi M, Alongi F, Navarria P, Belka C. Current status and recent advances in reirradiation of glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:36. [PMID: 33602305 PMCID: PMC7890828 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01767-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite aggressive management consisting of maximal safe surgical resection followed by external beam radiation therapy (60 Gy/30 fractions) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, approximately 90% of WHO grade IV gliomas (glioblastomas, GBM) will recur locally within 2 years. For patients with recurrent GBM, no standard of care exists. Thanks to the continuous improvement in radiation science and technology, reirradiation has emerged as feasible approach for patients with brain tumors. Using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), either hypofractionated or conventionally fractionated schedules, several studies have suggested survival benefits following reirradiation of patients with recurrent GBM; however, there are still questions to be answered about the efficacy and toxicity associated with a second course of radiation. We provide a clinical overview on current status and recent advances in reirradiation of GBM, addressing relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate patient selection and radiation technique, optimal dose fractionation, reirradiation tolerance of the brain and the risk of radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico le Scotte, 53100, Siena, Italy. .,IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, VR, Italy
| | - Piera Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Guan Y, Xiong J, Pan M, Shi W, Li J, Zhu H, Gong X, Li C, Mei G, Liu X, Pan L, Dai J, Wang Y, Wang E, Wang X. Safety and efficacy of Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for high-grade Gliomas at first recurrence: a single-center experience. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:123. [PMID: 33546642 PMCID: PMC7863415 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07856-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal treatment for recurrent high-grade gliomas (rHGGs) remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HSRS) as a first-line salvage treatment for in-field recurrence of high-grade gliomas. Methods Between January 2016 and October 2019, 70 patients with rHGG who underwent HSRS were retrospectively analysed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included both progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events, which were assessed according to Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. The prognostic value of key clinical features (age, performance status, planning target volume, dose, use of bevacizumab) was evaluated. Results A total of 70 patients were included in the study. Forty patients were male and 30 were female. Forty-nine had an initial diagnosis of glioblastoma (GBM), and the rest (21) were confirmed to be WHO grade 3 gliomas. The median planning target volume (PTV) was 16.68 cm3 (0.81–121.96 cm3). The median prescribed dose was 24 Gy (12–30 Gy) in 4 fractions (2–6 fractions). The median baseline of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 70 (40–90). With a median follow-up of 12.1 months, the median overall survival after salvage treatment was 17.6 months (19.5 and 14.6 months for grade 3 and 4 gliomas, respectively; p = .039). No grade 3 or higher toxicities was recorded. Multivariate analysis showed that concurrent bevacizumab with radiosurgery and KPS > 70 were favourable prognostic factors for grade 4 patients with HGG. Conclusions Salvage HSRS showed a favourable outcome and acceptable toxicity for rHGG. A prospective phase II study (NCT04197492) is ongoing to further investigate the value of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HSRS) in rHGG. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07856-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Guan
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Ji Xiong
- Department of pathology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Mingyuan Pan
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jing Li
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Huaguang Zhu
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Xiu Gong
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Chao Li
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Guanghai Mei
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Xiaoxia Liu
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Li Pan
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Jiazhong Dai
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Yang Wang
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Enmin Wang
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China. .,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China. .,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China. .,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.
| | - Xin Wang
- CyberKnife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China. .,Neurosurgical Institute of Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China. .,Shanghai Clinical Medical Center of Neurosurgery, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China. .,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Restoration and Neural Regeneration, 12 Wulumuqi Road (M), Shanghai, 200040, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for malignant gliomas: comparison with single session stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2019; 145:571-579. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03328-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
15
|
Morris SAL, Zhu P, Rao M, Martir M, Zhu JJ, Hsu S, Ballester LY, Day AL, Tandon N, Kim DH, Shepard S, Blanco A, Esquenazi Y. Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Combination with Bevacizumab for Recurrent Glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 2019; 127:e523-e533. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
16
|
Chapman CH, Hara JH, Molinaro AM, Clarke JL, Oberheim Bush NA, Taylor JW, Butowski NA, Chang SM, Fogh SE, Sneed PK, Nakamura JL, Raleigh DR, Braunstein SE. Reirradiation of recurrent high-grade glioma and development of prognostic scores for progression and survival. Neurooncol Pract 2019; 6:364-374. [PMID: 31555451 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Optimal techniques and patient selection for salvage reirradiation of high-grade glioma (HGG) are unclear. In this study, we identify prognostic factors for freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) after reirradiation, risk factors for high-grade toxicity, and validate clinical prognostic scores. Methods A total of 116 patients evaluated between 2000 and 2018 received reirradiation for HGG (99 WHO grade IV, 17 WHO grade III). Median time to first progression after initial therapy was 10.6 months. Salvage therapies before reirradiation included surgery (31%) and systemic therapy (41%). Sixty-five patients (56%) received single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as reirradiation. The median biologically effective dose (BED) was 47.25 Gy, and the median planning target volume (PTV) was 4.8 cc for SRS and 95.0 cc for non-SRS treatments. Systemic therapy was given concurrently to 52% and adjuvantly to 74% of patients. Results Median FFP was 4.9 months, and median OS was 11.0 months. Significant multivariable prognostic factors for FFP were performance status, time to initial progression, and BED; for OS they were age, time to initial progression, and PTV volume at recurrence. High-grade toxicity was correlated to PTV size at recurrence. Three-level prognostic scores were generated for FFP and OS, with cross-validated receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.640 and 0.687, respectively. Conclusions Clinical variables at the time of reirradiation for HGG can be used to prognosticate FFP and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jared H Hara
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu
| | - Annette M Molinaro
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA.,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco
| | - Jennifer L Clarke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Jennie W Taylor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Nicholas A Butowski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, USA
| | - Shannon E Fogh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Penny K Sneed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Jean L Nakamura
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco
| | - David R Raleigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco
| | - Steve E Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Patterns of re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas and validation of a prognostic score. Radiother Oncol 2018; 130:156-163. [PMID: 30446315 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OR OBJECTIVE Re-irradiation is a generally accepted method for salvage treatment in patients with recurrent glioma. However, no standard radiation regimen has been defined. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens and to independently externally validate a recently published reirradiation risk score. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with salvage conventionally fractionated (CFRT), hypofractionated (HFRT) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) between 2007 and 2017 at the University Medical Centers in Utrecht and Groningen. RESULTS Of the 121 patients included, 60 patients (50%) underwent CFRT, 22 (18%) HFRT and 39 (32%) SRT. The primary tumor was grade II-III in 52 patients and grade IV in 69 patients with median Overall Survival (mOS) since first surgery of 113 [Interquartile range: 53.2-137] and 39.7 [24.6-64.9] months respectively (p < 0.01). Overall, mOS from the first day of re-irradiation was 9.7 months [6.5-14.6]. No significant difference in mOS was found between the treatment groups. In multivariate analysis, the Karnofsky performance scale ≥70% (p < 0.01), re-irradiation for first recurrence (p = 0.02), longer time interval between RT start dates (p < 0.01) and smaller planning target volume (p < 0.05) were significant favorable prognostic factors. The reirradiation risk score was validated. CONCLUSION In our series, mOS after reirradiation was sufficient to justify use of this modality. Until a reliable treatment decision tool is developed based on larger retrospective research, the decision for re-irradiation schedule should remain personalized and based on a multidisciplinary evaluation of each patient.
Collapse
|
18
|
How Intraoperative Tools and Techniques Have Changed the Approach to Brain Tumor Surgery. Curr Oncol Rep 2018; 20:89. [DOI: 10.1007/s11912-018-0723-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
19
|
Shanker M, Chua B, Bettington C, Foote MC, Pinkham MB. Re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade gliomas: a systematic review and analysis of treatment technique with respect to survival and risk of radionecrosis. Neurooncol Pract 2018; 6:144-155. [PMID: 31386038 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npy019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Re-irradiation may be considered for select patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Treatment techniques include conformal radiotherapy employing conventional fractionation, hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Methods A pooled, population-weighted, multiple linear regression analysis of publications from 1992 to 2016 was performed to evaluate the relationships between re-irradiation technique and median overall survival (OS) and radionecrosis outcomes. Results Seventy published articles were analyzed, yielding a total of 3302 patients. Across all studies, initial treatment was external beam radiotherapy to a median dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions, with or without concurrent chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis, there was a significant correlation between OS and radiotherapy technique after adjusting for age, re-irradiation biologically equivalent dose (EQD2), interval between initial and repeat radiotherapy, and treatment volume (P < .0001). Adjusted mean OS was 12.2 months (95% CI, 11.8-12.5) after SRS, 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.7-10.5) after FSRT, and 8.9 months (95% CI, 8.4-9.4) after conventional fractionation. There was also a significant association between radionecrosis and treatment technique after adjusting for age, re-irradiation EQD2, interval, and volume (P < .0001). Radionecrosis rate was 7.1% (95% CI, 6.6-7.7) after FSRT, 6.1% (95% CI, 5.6-6.6) after SRS, and 1.1% (95% CI, 0.5-1.7) after conventional fractionation. Conclusions The published literature suggests that OS is highest after re-irradiation using SRS, followed by FSRT and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Whether this represents superiority of the treatment technique or an uncontrolled selection bias is uncertain. The risk of radionecrosis was low for all modalities overall. Re-irradiation is a feasible option in appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihir Shanker
- The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Benjamin Chua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Catherine Bettington
- The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Matthew C Foote
- The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Mark B Pinkham
- The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ho A, Jena R. Re-irradiation in the Brain: Primary Gliomas. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:124-136. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
21
|
Sutera PA, Bernard ME, Gill BS, Quan K, Engh JA, Burton SA, Heron DE. Salvage stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent gliomas with prior radiation therapy. Future Oncol 2017; 13:2681-2690. [PMID: 29198146 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2017-0226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aims to assess the viability of salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for recurrent malignant gliomas through assessing overall survival, local control and toxicity. We performed a retrospective review of 65 patients with 76 lesions (55 high-grade, 21 low-grade) treated with salvage SRS between 2002 and 2012. Median follow-up from salvage SRS was 14.9 months (IQR: 0.9-28.1), 8.3 months (IQR: 4.0-13.3) and 8.5 months (IQR: 3.9-15.8) for low-grade, high-grade, and combined, respectively. A 12-month overall survival from salvage SRS was 68.4, 38.7 and 47.3% for low-grade, high-grade and combined respectively. A total of 6-month local control was 86.2, 53.8 and 65.3% for low-grade, high-grade and combined, respectively. Our results indicate salvage SRS can provide acceptable survival and local control with minimal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip A Sutera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Mark E Bernard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Beant S Gill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Kimmen Quan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Johnathan A Engh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Steven A Burton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
| | - Dwight E Heron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fetcko K, Lukas RV, Watson GA, Zhang L, Dey M. Survival and complications of stereotactic radiosurgery: A systematic review of stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed and recurrent high-grade gliomas. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e8293. [PMID: 29068998 PMCID: PMC5671831 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000008293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2017] [Revised: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 09/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Utilization of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) has been slowly increasing with variable reported success rates. OBJECTIVE Systematic review of the available data to evaluate the efficacy of SRS as a treatment for HGG with regards to median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), in addition to ascertaining the rate of radiation necrosis and other SRS-related major neurological complications. METHODS Literature searches were performed for publications from 1992 to 2016. The pooled estimates of median PFS and median OS were calculated as a weighted estimate of population medians. Meta-analyses of published rates of radiation necrosis and other major neurological complications were also performed. RESULTS Twenty-nine studies reported the use of SRS for recurrent HGG, and 16 studies reported the use of SRS for newly diagnosed HGG. For recurrent HGG, the pooled estimates of median PFS and median OS were 5.42 months (3-16 months) and 20.19 months (9-65 months), respectively; the pooled radiation necrosis rate was 5.9% (0-44%); and the pooled estimates of major neurological complications rate was 3.3% (0-23%). For newly diagnosed HGG, the pooled estimates of median PFS and median OS were 7.89 months (5.5-11 months) and 16.87 months (9.5-33 months) respectively; the pooled radiation necrosis rate was 6.5% (0-33%); and the pooled estimates of other major neurological complications rate was 1.5% (0-25%). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that SRS holds promise as a relatively safe treatment option for HGG. In terms of efficacy at this time, there are inadequate data to support routine utilization of SRS as the standard of care for newly diagnosed or recurrent HGG. Further studies should be pursued to define more clearly the therapeutic role of SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaleigh Fetcko
- Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Rimas V. Lukas
- Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Gordon A. Watson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Lingjiao Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philidelphia, PA
| | - Mahua Dey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Abstract
Recurrent malignant glioma continues to be a clinical challenge, and repeat surgery is an option in only select patients. Stereotactic laser ablation, a new minimally invasive technique, can be used as an alternative to surgery. We review the current literature on laser ablation for recurrent malignant gliomas as well as discuss practical and theoretical advantages and disadvantages of this emerging technique in comparison with repeat surgery or radiation. We also discuss the potential for laser ablation to augment adjuvant therapies, namely, chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Analiz Rodriguez
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Stephen B. Tatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Taunk NK, Moraes FY, Escorcia FE, Mendez LC, Beal K, Marta GN. External beam re-irradiation, combination chemoradiotherapy, and particle therapy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2016; 16:347-58. [PMID: 26781426 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2016.1143364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a common aggressive primary malignant brain tumor, and is nearly universal in progression and mortality after initial treatment. Re-irradiation presents a promising treatment option for progressive disease, both palliating symptoms and potentially extending survival. Highly conformal radiation techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated radiosurgery are effective short courses of treatment that allow delivery of high doses of therapeutic radiation with steep dose gradients to protect normal tissue. Patients with higher performance status, younger age, and longer interval between primary treatment and progression represent the best candidates for re-irradiation. Multiple studies are also underway involving combinations of radiation and systemic therapy to bend the survival curve and improve the therapeutic index. In the multimodal treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma, the use of surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy should be highly individualized. Here we comprehensively review radiation therapy and techniques, along with discussion of combination treatment and novel strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil K Taunk
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , New York , USA
| | - Fabio Y Moraes
- b Department of Radiation Oncology , Hospital Sírio-Libanês , São Paulo , Brazil
| | - Freddy E Escorcia
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , New York , USA
| | - Lucas Castro Mendez
- d Department of Radiation Oncology , Instituto de Radiologia - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) , São Paulo , Brazil
| | - Kathryn Beal
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York , New York , USA
| | - Gustavo N Marta
- b Department of Radiation Oncology , Hospital Sírio-Libanês , São Paulo , Brazil.,c Department of Radiation Oncology , Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP) - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) , São Paulo , Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brain metastasis from melanoma: the prognostic value of varying sites of extracranial disease. J Neurooncol 2015; 125:411-8. [PMID: 26354772 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1932-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 09/06/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Patients with brain metastasis from melanoma have poor outcomes. Radiation is used both for prognostic and symptomatic value. We aimed to further clarify the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) as well as the prognostic implication of various sites of extracranial disease. The records of 73 consecutive patients treated at the University of Rochester Medical Center for brain-metastatic melanoma from January 2004 to October 2013 were reviewed. The median overall survival (OS) was 3.0 months. Patients treated with WBRT alone had decreased OS compared to those treated with SRS alone (HR = 0.38, p = 0.001) or WBRT and SRS (HR = 0.51, p = 0.039). The mean number of brain metastasis differed (p = 0.002) in patients in patients who received WBRT (4.0) compared to those who did not (2.0). Among patients with extracranial disease (n = 63), bone metastasis (HR = 1.86, p = 0.047, n = 15) was a negative prognostic factor; liver (HR = 1.59, p = 0.113, n = 17), lung (HR = 1.51, p = 0.23, n = 51) and adrenal metastasis (HR = 1.70, p = 0.15, n = 10) were not. In patients with concurrent brain and lung metastasis, those with disease limited to those two sites (OS = 8.7 mo, n = 13) had improved OS (HR = 0.44, p = 0.014) compared to those with additional disease (OS = 1.8 mo, n = 50). Based on this hypothesis-generating retrospective analysis, SRS may offer survival benefit compared to WBRT alone in patients with brain metastatic melanoma. Bone metastasis appears to confer a particularly poor prognosis. Those with disease confined to the lung and brain may represent a population with improved prognosis.
Collapse
|