High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) impacts activities of daily living of patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Stroke Rehabilitation: Synopsis of the 2024 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guidelines

DESCRIPTION

In July 2024, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) released a joint update of their 2019 clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of stroke rehabilitation. This synopsis is a condensed version of the 2024 CPG, highlighting the key aspects of the guideline development process and describing the major recommendations.

METHODS

The VA/DOD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group convened a joint VA/DOD guideline development work group (WG) that included clinical stakeholders and conformed to the Institute of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy CPGs. The guideline WG conducted a patient focus group, developed key questions, and systematically searched and evaluated the literature (English-language publications from 1 July 2018 to 2 May 2023). The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used to evaluate the evidence. The WG developed 47 recommendations along with algorithms for stroke rehabilitation in the inpatient and outpatient settings. Stakeholders outside the WG reviewed the CPG before approval by the VA/DOD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group.

RECOMMENDATIONS

This synopsis summarizes where evidence is strongest to support guidelines in crucial areas relevant to primary care physicians: transition to community (case management, psychosocial or behavioral interventions); motor therapy (task-specific practice, mirror therapy, rhythmic auditory stimulation, electrical stimulation, botulinum toxin for spasticity); dysphagia, aphasia, and cognition (chin tuck against resistance, respiratory muscle strength training); and mental health (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use, psychotherapy, mindfulness-based therapies for treatment but not prevention of depression).

Effectiveness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Executive Function, Attention, and Memory in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective intervention for improving cognitive impairment in patients with stroke. However, its effectiveness in the subdomains of cognition is conflicting and not clearly established. This systematic review assessed the efficacy of TMS in improving executive function, attention, and memory in this population. Seven databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, NeuroBITE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and OTseeker, were searched for indexed literature until July 2024 to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of this effect in stroke patients. This systematic review was performed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Handbook of the Cochrane Library and evaluated the quality of evidence using the Risk of Bias 2 tools and grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) systems. Meta-analyses were performed using standardized mean difference (SMD) (Hedge's g) as the effect measure, and subgroups were performed to explore potential outcomes. The research included 13 RCTs involving 496 patients with stroke. The results indicated that TMS could affect executive function (six RCTs with SMD = 0.55; 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.04-1.05) and memory (nine RCTs with SMD = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.25-0.89) in patients with stroke. However, the effectiveness of TMS on attention (five RCTs with SMD = 0.32; 95% CI = -0.1 to 0.75) was not clear. The quality of the results varied between very low and low according to the GRADE approach. In conclusion, TMS may affect executive function and memory, but not attention. The quality of the evidence for the outcomes varied from very low to low owing to heterogeneity and bias; therefore, the results should be considered with caution, and more rigorous evidence is needed.

Clinical study of different frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with paroxetine in the treatment of poststroke depression with insomnia

BACKGROUND

Study the treatment of poststroke depression and insomnia using varied repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) frequencies alongside paroxetine. Aim to enhance rTMS effectiveness for depression, insomnia, neurological impairment, and daily living skills.

METHODS

Ninety poststroke depression (PSD) patients were randomly divided into a low-frequency group (low-frequency rTMS + enteric-coated paroxetine), a high-frequency group (high-frequency rTMS + enteric-coated paroxetine), and a control group (sham stimulation + enteric-coated paroxetine). The treatment was administered 5 times a week for a total of 2 weeks. Before treatment, at the end of the 2-week treatment, and at the end of the 6-week follow-up, the 3 groups of patients were assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI). The mean differences of scores measured at different frequencies and at different times were analyzed by repeated measure one-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The interaction between different frequency and score before and after treatment was significant. HAMD, PSQI, and NIHSS scores of the 3 groups after 2 weeks of treatment and 6 weeks of follow-up were significantly lower than before treatment, while MBI scores were opposite. The main effect of treatment scores in different frequency groups showed that HAMD, NIHSS, and MBI scores were not significantly different among the 3 groups before treatment. The HAMD, PSQI, and NIHSS scores of the low frequency group and the high frequency group were significantly lower than those of the control group after treatment, and the MBI scores were the opposite, except that there was no significant difference in HAMD-17 scores among the 3 groups at the 6-week follow-up. Among them, HAMD score in high-frequency group was significantly lower than that in low-frequency group, and PSQI score was significantly higher than that in low-frequency group.

CONCLUSION

Low-frequency rTMS combined with medication has a better therapeutic effect on the insomnia symptoms of PSD, while high-frequency rTMS combined with medication has a more pronounced therapeutic effect on the depressive symptoms of PSD. Both high-frequency and low-frequency rTMS have an improving effect on neurofunctional deficits and activities of daily living.

Effects of different modalities of transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-stroke cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate, using a network meta-analysis, the effects of different transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) modalities on improving cognitive function after stroke.

METHODS

Computer searches of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embass, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were conducted to collect randomized controlled clinical studies on the use of TMS to improve cognitive function in stroke patients, published from the time of database construction to November 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies and 2123 patients were included, comprising five interventions: high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS), low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS), intermittent theta rhythm stimulation (iTBS), sham stimulation (SS), and conventional rehabilitation therapy (CRT). A reticulated meta-analysis showed that the rankings of different TMS intervention modalities in terms of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, Mini-Mental State Examination scores (MMSE), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores were: HF-rTMS > LF-rTMS > iTBS > SS > CRT; the rankings of different TMS intervention modalities in terms of the event-related potential P300. amplitude scores were HF-rTMS > LF-rTMS > iTBS > CRT > SS; the rankings of different TMS intervention modalities in terms of the P300 latency scores were: iTBS > HF-rTMS > LF-rTMS > SS > CRT. Subgroup analyses of secondary outcome indicators showed that HF-rTMS significantly improved Rivermead Behavior Memory Test scores and Functional Independence Measurement-Cognitive scores.

CONCLUSIONS

High-frequency TMS stimulation has a better overall effect on improving cognitive functions and activities of daily living, such as attention and memory in stroke patients.

Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVE

The reliability of clinical evidence depends on high-quality meta-analyses/ systematic reviews (MAs/SRs). However, there has been no assessment of the quality of MAs/SRs for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), both nationally and internationally. This article seeks to use radar plotting to visually present the quality of MAs/SRs on rTMS for improving cognitive function in PSCI, aiming to offer an intuitive foundation for clinical research.

METHODS

Eight Chinese or English databases were systematically searched to collect comprehensive literature, and the retrieval time ranged from inception to 26 March 2024. Literature ranking was calculated using six dimensions: publication year, design type, AMSTAR-2 score, PRISMA score, publication bias, and homogeneity. Finally, radar plots were drafted to present a multivariate literature evaluation. The GRADE tool assessed the strength of evidence for the outcome indicators included in the MAs/SRs.

RESULTS

The 17 articles included had average scores of 12.29, 17, 9.88, 9.71, 12.88, and 12.76 for each dimension. The radar plot showed that an article published in 2023 had the highest rank and a large radar plot area, while an article published in 2021 had the lowest rank and a small radar plot area. The GRADE tool evaluation revealed that 51 pieces of evidence were of very low quality, 67 were of low quality, 12 were of moderate quality, and only one was of high quality.

CONCLUSION

The average rank score of literature ranged from 8.50 to 17, with higher rankings indicating greater significance in literature reference. Variations in literature quality were attributed to inadequate study planning, irregular literature search and screening, insufficient description of inclusion criteria for studies, and inadequate consideration of bias risk in the included studies. Most MAs/SRs indicated that rTMS was more effective than the control group in enhancing the global cognitive function and activities of daily living in PSCI patients. However, the overall quality of the literature was generally low and needs validation from future high-quality evidence.Systematic review registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023491280.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Alzheimer's disease: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis

Objective

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative condition that significantly impacts both individuals and society. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a treatment for AD by summarizing the evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs).

Methods

SRs/MAs of rTMS for AD were collected by searching Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, VIP, Sino-Med, and Wanfang databases. The search was conducted from database creation to January 23, 2024. Methodological quality, reporting quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Assessing Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tool and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). In addition, the quality of evidence for outcome measures was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results

Eight SRs/MAs included in this study met the inclusion criteria. Based on the AMSTAR-2, 4 of the SRs/MA were classified as low quality, while the remaining 4 were deemed to be of very low quality. The PRISMA analysis revealed that out of the 27 items reporting, 16 achieved full reporting (100%). However, there were still some deficiencies in reporting, particularly related to protocol and registration, search strategy, risk of bias, and additional analysis. The ROBIS tool indicated that only 3 SRs/MAs had a low risk of bias. The GRADE assessment indicated that 6 outcomes were of moderate quality (18.75%), 16 were of low quality (50%), and 10 were classified as very low quality (31.25%).

Conclusion

Based on the evidence collected, rTMS appears to be effective in improving cognitive function in AD patients, although the methodological quality of the SRs/MAs reduces the reliability of the conclusions and the overall quality is low. However, based on the available results, we still support the value of rTMS as an intervention to improve cognitive function in AD. In future studies, it is necessary to confirm the efficacy of rTMS in AD patients and provide more reliable and scientific data to contribute to evidence-based medicine.

Post-stroke rehabilitation in the peri-pandemic COVID-19 era

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which arose in late 2019, caused extensive destruction, impacting a substantial proportion of the worldwide population and leading to millions of deaths. Although COVID-19 is mainly linked to respiratory and pulmonary complications, it has the potential to affect neurologic structures as well. Neurological involvement may manifest as minimal and reversible; however, a notable proportion of cases have exhibited pronounced neurological consequences, such as strokes. Endothelial inflammation, hypercoagulation, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system alterations, and cardiogenic embolism are the pathophysiological mechanisms of stroke under COVID-19 circumstances. Physical activity and exercise have improved several aspects of post-stroke recovery, including cardiovascular health, walking capacity, and upper limb strength. They are commonly used to assist stroke survivors in overcoming their motor restrictions. Furthermore, stroke rehabilitation can incorporate a range of specific techniques, including body-weight-supported treadmill applications, constraint-induced movement therapy, robotic rehabilitation interventions, transcranial direct current stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and prism adaptation training. Under pandemic conditions, there were several barriers to neurological rehabilitation. The most significant of these were individual's fear of infection, which caused them to postpone their rehabilitation applications and rehabilitation areas being converted into COVID-19 units. The primary emphasis had turned to COVID-19 treatment. Several valuable data and views were gained in reorganizing rehabilitation during the pandemic, contributing to establishing future views in this regard.

Activation changes in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment receiving intermittent theta burst stimulation: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study

BACKGROUND

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) has demonstrated efficacy in patients with cognitive impairment. However, activation patterns and mechanisms of iTBS for post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) remain insufficiently understood.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the activation patterns and potential benefits of using iTBS in patients with PSCI.

METHODS

A total of forty-four patients with PSCI were enrolled and divided into an iTBS group (iTBS and cognitive training) or a control group (cognitive training alone). Outcomes were assessed based on the activation in functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), as well as Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) and the modified Barthel Index (MBI).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients completed the interventions and assessments. Increased cortical activation was observed in the iTBS group after the interventions, including the right superior temporal gyrus (STG), left frontopolar cortex (FPC) and left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Both groups showed significant improvements in LOTCA and MBI after the interventions (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the iTBS group augmented superior improvement in the total score of MBI and LOTCA compared to the control group, especially in visuomotor organization and thinking operations (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

iTBS altered activation patterns and improved cognitive function in patients with PSCI. The activation induced by iTBS may contribute to the improvement of cognitive function.