Colistin combination therapy improves microbiologic cure in critically ill patients with multi-drug resistant gram-negative pneumonia

Do Pathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Gallus gallus in South Africa Carry Co-Resistance Toward Colistin and Carbapenem Antimicrobials?

Colistin and carbapenems are critically important antimicrobials often used as a last resort to manage multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in humans. With limited alternatives, resistance to these antimicrobials is of concern as organisms could potentially spread horizontally rendering treatments ineffective. The aim of this study was to investigate co-resistance to colistin and carbapenems among Escherichia coli isolated from poultry in South Africa. Forty-six E. coli strains obtained from clinical cases of breeder and broiler chickens were used. In addition to other antibiotics, all the isolates were tested against colistin and carbapenems using broth microdilution. Multiplex polymerase chain reactions were used to investigate the presence of colistin (mcr-1 to 5) and carbapenem (blaOXA-48, blaNDM-1, and blaVIM) resistance genes. Isolates exhibiting colistin resistance (>2 μg/mL) underwent a whole-genome sequencing analysis. Resistance to colistin (10.9%) and cefepime (6.5%) was noted with all colistin-resistant strains harboring the mcr-1 gene. None of the E. coli isolates were resistant to carbapenems nor carried the other resistant genes (mcr-2 to 5, blaOXA-48, blaNDM-1, and blaVIM). The mcr-1-positive strains belonged to sequence types ST117 and ST156 and carried virulence genes ompA, aslA, fdeC, fimH, iroN, iutA, tsh, pic, ast A and set 1A/1B. In conclusion, clinical E. coli strains from chickens in this study possessed mobile resistance genes for colistin and several other clinically relevant antimicrobials but not carbapenems. Additionally, they belonged to sequence types in addition to carrying virulence factors often associated with human extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli infections. Thus, the potential risk of transmitting these strains to humans cannot be underestimated especially if sick birds are dispatched into the thriving poorly regulated Cornish hen industry. The need for routine veterinary surveillance and monitoring of antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial use and the importance of strengthening regulations guiding the informal poultry sector remains important.

Resensitizing multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria to carbapenems and colistin using disulfiram

The increasing incidence of bacterial infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria has deepened the need for new effective treatments. Antibiotic adjuvant strategy is a more effective and economical approach to expand the lifespan of currently used antibiotics. Herein, we uncover that alcohol-abuse drug disulfiram (DSF) and derivatives thereof are potent antibiotic adjuvants, which dramatically potentiate the antibacterial activity of carbapenems and colistin against New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)- and mobilized colistin resistance (MCR)-expressing Gram-negative pathogens, respectively. Mechanistic studies indicate that DSF improves meropenem efficacy by specifically inhibiting NDM activity. Moreover, the robust potentiation of DSF to colistin is due to its ability to exacerbate the membrane-damaging effects of colistin and disrupt bacterial metabolism. Notably, the passage and conjugation assays reveal that DSF minimizes the evolution and spread of meropenem and colistin resistance in clinical pathogens. Finally, their synergistic efficacy in animal models was evaluated and DSF-colistin/meropenem combination could effectively treat MDR bacterial infections in vivo. Taken together, our works demonstrate that DSF and its derivatives are versatile and potent colistin and carbapenems adjuvants, opening a new horizon for the treatment of difficult-to-treat infections.

Microbiologic Cure with a Simplified Dosage of Intravenous Colistin in Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Colistin's FDA weight-based dosing (WBD) and frequency are both expressed in a broad range. Therefore, a simplified fixed-dose regimen (SFDR) of intravenous colistin based on three body-weight segments has been established for adults. The SFDR falls within the WBD range of each body-weight segment and accounts for the pharmacokinetic features. This study compared microbiologic cure with colistin SFDR to WBD in critically ill adults.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted for colistin orders from January 2014 to February 2022. The study included ICU patients who received intravenous colistin for carbapenem-non-susceptible, colistin-intermediate Gram-negative bacilli infections. Patients received the SFDR after the protocol was implemented, as the WBD was previously used. The primary endpoint was microbiologic cure. Secondary endpoints were 30-day infection recurrence and acute kidney injury (AKI).

Results

Of the 228 screened patients, 84 fulfilled the inclusion and matching criteria (42 in each group). The microbiologic cure rate was 69% with the SFDR and 36% with the WBD [p=0.002]. Infection recurred in four of the 29 patients who had a microbiologic cure with the SFDR (14%), and in six of the 15 patients with WBD (40%); [p=0.049]. AKI occurred in seven of the 36 SFDR patients who were not on hemodialysis (19%) and 15 of the 33 WBD patients (46%); [p=0.021].

Conclusion

In this study, colistin SFDR was associated with a higher microbiologic cure in carbapenem-non-susceptible, colistin-intermediate Gram-negative bacilli infections and with a lower incidence of AKI in critically ill adults compared to WBD.

Polymyxin combination therapy for multidrug-resistant, extensively-drug resistant, and difficult-to-treat drug-resistant gram-negative infections: is it superior to polymyxin monotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

The increasing prevalence of infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively-drug resistant (XDR) or difficult-to-treat drug resistant (DTR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter species, and Escherichia coli poses a severe challenge.

AREAS COVERED

The rapid growing of multi-resistant GNB as well as the considerable deceleration in development of new anti-infective agents have made polymyxins (e.g. polymyxin B and colistin) a mainstay in clinical practices as either monotherapy or combination therapy. However, whether the polymyxin-based combinations lead to better outcomes remains unknown. This review mainly focuses on the effect of polymyxin combination therapy versus monotherapy on treating GNB-related infections. We also provide several factors in designing studies and their impact on optimizing polymyxin combinations.

EXPERT OPINION

An abundance of recent in vitro and preclinical in vivo data suggest clinical benefit for polymyxin-drug combination therapies, especially colistin plus meropenem and colistin plus rifampicin, with synergistic killing against MDR, XDR, and DTR P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii. The beneficial effects of polymyxin-drug combinations (e.g. colistin or polymyxin B + carbapenem against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, polymyxin B + carbapenem + rifampin against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, and colistin + ceftolozan/tazobactam + rifampin against PDR-P. aeruginosa) have often been shown in clinical setting by retrospective studies. However, high-certainty evidence from large randomized controlled trials is necessary. These clinical trials should incorporate careful attention to patient's sample size, characteristics of patient's groups, PK/PD relationships and dosing, rapid detection of resistance, MIC determinations, and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses of the synergistic effect of polymyxin-rifampicin combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

BACKGROUND

Understanding the mechanism of antimicrobial action is critical for improving antibiotic therapy. For the first time, we integrated correlative metabolomics and transcriptomics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to elucidate the mechanism of synergistic killing of polymyxin-rifampicin combination.

METHODS

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and RNA-seq analyses were conducted to identify the significant changes in the metabolome and transcriptome of P. aeruginosa PAO1 after exposure to polymyxin B (1 mg/L) and rifampicin (2 mg/L) alone, or in combination over 24 h. A genome-scale metabolic network was employed for integrative analysis.

RESULTS

In the first 4-h treatment, polymyxin B monotherapy induced significant lipid perturbations, predominantly to fatty acids and glycerophospholipids, indicating a substantial disorganization of the bacterial outer membrane. Expression of ParRS, a two-component regulatory system involved in polymyxin resistance, was increased by polymyxin B alone. Rifampicin alone caused marginal metabolic perturbations but significantly affected gene expression at 24 h. The combination decreased the gene expression of quorum sensing regulated virulence factors at 1 h (e.g. key genes involved in phenazine biosynthesis, secretion system and biofilm formation); and increased the expression of peptidoglycan biosynthesis genes at 4 h. Notably, the combination caused substantial accumulation of nucleotides and amino acids that last at least 4 h, indicating that bacterial cells were in a state of metabolic arrest.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the substantial potential of integrative systems pharmacology to determine mechanisms of synergistic bacterial killing by antibiotic combinations, which will help optimize their use in patients.

Optimal dosing interval of intravenous Colistin monotherapy versus combination therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

We aimed to maximize the clinical response and effectiveness of colistin antibiotics in patients with multi-drug (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria, there is an increasing interest in colistin combination therapy with other antibiotics and extended interval dosing regimens. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim is to evaluate if the combination therapy is superior to monotherapy with colistin regarding increased survival and also which dose interval is the most effective to utilize. English language, peer-reviewed journal publications from the first date available to 25 January 2022 were identified by searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Forest plots for overall and subgroups and funnel plots were graphed. 42 studies were included in the study. Among them, 38 studies were on combination therapy, and four on dose interval. The overall pooled odds ratio is 0.77 (CI: 0.62; 0.95) (p value < 0.017). The I^2 value was 43% (p value < 0.01). The Begg correlation test of funnel plot asymmetry showed no significant publication bias (0.064). The overall pooled odds ratio for Carbapenem is 0.74 (CI: 0.48; 1.13). A prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT) on 40 adults intensive care unit (ICU) patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), comparing the mortality and ICU length of stay of 8- or 24- hour intervals regimens, showed that the ICU length of stay and ICU mortality were; 31.31, 35.3 days, and 32.06, 22.2% in groups 24-h interval and 8- hour interval (p value: 0.39, 0.87), respectively. It seems that combination therapy is associated with drug synergism and increased survival. The extended interval colistin administration may result in higher peak concentration and bacterial eradication. In both cases, we face a dearth of literature.

Leveraging laboratory and clinical studies to design effective antibiotic combination therapy

Interest in antibiotic combination therapy is increasing due to antimicrobial resistance and a slowing antibiotic pipeline. However, aside from specific indications, combination therapy in the clinic is often not administered systematically; instead, it is used at the physician's discretion as a bet-hedging mechanism to increase the chances of appropriately targeting a pathogen(s) with an unknown antibiotic resistance profile. Some recent clinical trials have been unable to demonstrate superior efficacy of combination therapy over monotherapy. Other trials have shown a benefit of combination therapy in defined circumstances consistent with recent studies indicating that factors including species, strain, resistance profile, and microenvironment affect drug combination efficacy and drug interactions. In this review, we discuss how a careful study design that takes these factors into account, along with the different drug interaction and potency metrics for assessing combination performance, may provide the necessary insight to understand the best clinical use-cases for combination therapy.

Clinical management of severe infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria: a worldwide cross-sectional survey addressing the use of antibiotic combinations

OBJECTIVES

Optimal treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) infections is uncertain because of the lack of good-quality evidence and the limited effectiveness of available antibiotics. The aim of this survey was to investigate clinicians' prescribing strategies for treating CR-GNB infections worldwide.

METHODS

A 36-item questionnaire was developed addressing the following aspects of antibiotic prescribing: respondent's background, diagnostic and therapeutic availability, preferred antibiotic strategies and rationale for selecting combination therapy. Prescribers were recruited following the snowball sampling approach, and a post-stratification correction with inverse proportional weights was used to adjust the sample's representativeness.

RESULTS

A total of 1012 respondents from 95 countries participated in the survey. Overall, 298 (30%) of the respondents had local guidelines for treating CR-GNB at their facility and 702 (71%) had access to Infectious Diseases consultation, with significant discrepancies according to country economic status: 85% (390/502) in high-income countries versus 59% (194/283) in upper-medium-income countries and 30% (118/196) in lower-middle-income countries/lower-income-countries). Targeted regimens varied widely, ranging from 40 regimens for CR-Acinetobacter spp. to more than 100 regimens for CR-Enterobacteriaceae. Although the majority of respondents acknowledged the lack of evidence behind this choice, dual combination was the preferred treatment scheme and carbapenem-polymyxin was the most prescribed regimen, irrespective of pathogen and infection source. Respondents noticeably disagreed around the meaning of 'combination therapy' with 20% (150/783) indicating the simple addition of multiple compounds, 42% (321/783) requiring the presence of in vitro activity and 38% (290/783) requiring in vitro synergism.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of CR-GNB infections is far from being standardized. Strategic public health focused randomized controlled trials are urgently required to inform evidence-based treatment guidelines.

Polymyxin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objectives

The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness of Colistin monotherapy and combination therapy for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections.

Data sources

PubMed, Cochrane Library.

Study eligibility interventions and exclusions

In this systematic review, we included all retrospective and prospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intravenous polymyxin monotherapy and combination therapy with any other antibiotic for treating multidrug-resistant infections. Studies using inhaled polymyxins with 5 or less than 5 patients were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality and if not reported at day 30 we extracted and documented the closest time point. Both crude outcome rates and adjusted effect estimates were extracted for mortality.

Study appraisal data extraction and synthesis

Search string used was "(Colistin OR polymyxin) AND (Enterobacteriaceae OR Klebsiella OR Acinetobacter OR Escherichia coli OR Pseudomonas) AND (random OR prospective OR retrospective OR cohort OR observational OR blind)." Thirty-nine studies were included in our analysis; out of which 6 RCTs were included and 9 studies used carbapenem as the adjunctive antibiotic. Each study was screened and reviewed for eligibility independently by two authors and data extrapolated on an Excel sheet.

Results

The meta-analysis of polymyxin monotherapy vs. combination therapy in multidrug-resistant infections yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.01) with minimal heterogeneity (I ² = 40%), whereas pooled analysis of this comparison in studies that included carbapenem as combination therapy yielded an OR of 0.64 (CI: 0.40-1.03; I ² = 62%). Likewise, the pooled analysis of the RCTs yielded an OR of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.58-1.16, I ² = 22%). All these showed no statistical significance. However, it was seen that polymyxin combination therapy was more effective in multidrug-resistant infections compared to polymyxin monotherapy. The effectiveness was more glaring when carbapenems were used as the combination drug instead of any other antibiotic and more so in many in vitro studies that used polymyxin combination therapy.

Conclusion

Although statistically insignificant, it would be prudent to use polymyxin combination therapy to treat multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli (GNB) infection over monotherapy with preference to use carbapenem as the adjunct alongside polymyxins.

How to cite this article

Samal S, Mishra SB, Patra SK, Rath A, Dash A, Nayak B, et al. Polymyxin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):199-206.

Clinical Implications of Microbiologic Treatment Failure in the Setting of Clinical Cure of Bacterial Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Microbiologic cure is a common outcome in pneumonia clinical trials, but its clinical significance is incompletely understood.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized with bacterial pneumonia who achieved clinical cure. Rates of recurrent pneumonia and death were compared between patients with persistent growth of the index pathogen at the time of clinical cure (microbiologic failure) and those with pathogen eradication (microbiologic cure).

RESULTS

Among 441 patients, 237 experienced microbiologic cure and 204 experienced microbiologic failure. Prevalences of comorbidities, ventilator dependence, and severity of acute illness were similar between groups. Patients with microbiologic failure experienced significantly higher rates of recurrent pneumonia or death following clinical cure than patients with microbiologic cure, controlling for comorbid conditions, severity of acute illness, appropriateness of empiric antibiotics, intensive care unit placement, tracheostomy dependence, and immunocompromised status (90-day multivariable adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.35). This association was observed among patients with pneumonias caused by Staphylococcus aureus (90-day multivariable adjusted OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.73-7.90). A trend was observed among pneumonias caused by nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli, but not Enterobacteriaceae or other pathogens.

CONCLUSIONS

Microbiologic treatment failure was independently associated with recurrent pneumonia or death among patients with bacterial pneumonia following clinical cure. Microbiologic cure merits further study as a metric to guide therapeutic interventions for patients with bacterial pneumonia.

Monotherapy versus combination therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Infections caused by carbapenemase-producing, multidrug-resistant (MDR), or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria constitute a major therapeutic challenge. Whether combination antibiotic therapy is superior to monotherapy remains unknown. In this systematic review and meta-analysis OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published by December 2016 comparing mono- with combination antibiotic therapy for infections with carbapenemase-producing, MDR, or XDR Gram-negative bacteria. Mortality and clinical cure rates served as primary and secondary outcome measures, respectively. Of 8847 initially identified studies, 53 studies – covering pneumonia (n = 10 studies), blood stream (n = 15), osteoarticular (n = 1), and mixed infections (n = 27) - were included. 41% (n = 1848) of patients underwent monotherapy, and 59% (n = 2666) combination therapy. In case series/cohort studies (n = 45) mortality was lower with combination- vs. monotherapy (RR 0.83, CI 0.73–0.93, p = 0.002, I² = 24%). Subgroup analysis revealed lower mortality with combination therapy with at least two in-vitro active antibiotics, in blood stream infections, and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. No mortality difference was seen in case-control studies (n = 6) and RCTs (n = 2). Cure rates did not differ regardless of study type. The two included RCTs had a high and unknown risk of bias, respectively. 16.7% (1/6) of case-control studies and 37.8% (17/45) of cases series/cohort studies were of good quality, whereas quality was poor in the remaining studies. In conclusion, combination antimicrobial therapy of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria appears to be superior to monotherapy with regard to mortality.

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Solid Organ Transplantation: Management Principles

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) have emerged as a worldwide problem. Given their degree of immunosuppression and the level of contact with the healthcare system, solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at a disproportionately higher risk of acquisition, colonization, and infection with CRE, and outcomes from infection tend to be worse compared to non-transplant patients. Therapeutic options are limited for CRE infections although several newer agents have recently been approved for use. How well these agents perform in the setting of immunosuppression and SOT is unclear. We sought to review the epidemiology of CRE in SOT and the management principles.

RECENT FINDINGS

CRE infections are becoming an increasing problem in SOT, and donor-derived infections present a challenge in the peri-transplant period. Newer treatments for CRE are emerging that are less toxic and potentially more effective than prior CRE-active agents, but supportive clinical data are limited. Newer beta-lactamase inhibitors have good activity against KPC carbapenemases, but they lack activity against metallo-beta-lactamases (e.g., NDM). Promising data is emerging with newer agents that have activity against most carbapenemases, but, again, clinical data is needed. Combination therapy in addition to optimal pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics may go some way to improve outcomes against these difficult-to-treat organisms. Other novel therapies that prevent the emergence of resistance (oral beta-lactamase inhibitors) and eradication of resistant Gram-negative colonization (fecal microbiota transplant) may eventually become part of a bundle approach to reduce CRE infections in the future. As in non-transplant patients, CRE infections in the transplant setting are challenging to treat and prevent. Infection prevention and control remains crucial to prevent widespread dissemination, and unique challenges exist with donor-derived CRE and how best to manage recipients in the peri-transplant period. Newer treatments are now in early-phase clinical studies, and in vitro activity data are supportive for several agents providing hope for improved outcomes with these typically difficult-to-treat and highly morbid infections in transplant recipients.

Intravenous colistin combination antimicrobial treatment vs. monotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To evaluate whether intravenous colistin in combination with other antibiotics (IVCC) is associated with lower mortality compared with intravenous colistin monotherapy (IVCM), and to identify factors influencing study outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus were searched up to November 2016. Studies were included if they evaluated adult patients with multi-drug-resistant (MDR) or extensively-drug-resistant Gram-negative infections, and reported comparative mortality data (adjusted and unadjusted) for patients receiving IVCC vs. IVCM. Random effects meta-analyses were performed.

FINDINGS

Thirty-two studies (29 observational, three randomized) were included. The overall quality of data was low to very low, and studies were characterized by the lack of adjusted data. The majority of studies were not designed to evaluate the outcome of the meta-analysis, and focused mainly on infections due to Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Colistin was administered at variable doses, with or without a loading dose, and in combination with several antibiotics. Overall, IVCC was not associated with lower mortality than IVCM [32 studies, 2328 patients, risk ratio (RR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.02, I2 8%]. A significant difference was observed in favour of IVCC when high-dose (>6 million international units) colistin was used (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.93), in studies conducted in Asia (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95), in patients with bacteraemia (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-0.98) and in patients with acinetobacter infections (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.00).

INTERPRETATION

Overall, low-quality data suggest that IVCC did not lower mortality in patients with MDR Gram-negative infections. However, there is some evidence for a benefit observed with high intravenous doses of colistin.

Detection of colistin heteroresistance in Acinetobacter baumannii from blood and respiratory isolates

Polymyxins are one of the last-line antibiotics for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Reports have demonstrated the emergence of colistin heteroresistance in A. baumannii, which can complicate assessment of minimum inhibitory concentrations and promote resistance to colistin. We aimed to determine the presence of colistin heteroresistance in A. baumannii isolates and correlate the results with clinical and microbiological outcomes via a retrospective study of 24 adult patients: 12 blood and 12 invasive respiratory cultures positive for colistin-susceptible A. baumannii between 1 January 2013 and 31 July 2015. Heteroresistance testing was performed by plating a 100-μL bacterial cell suspension on Mueller-Hinton agar plates containing 0, 1, 2, and 4 μg/mL colistin, and assessing for growth at 24 and 48 h. Colistin heteroresistance was exhibited in 83% of isolates. Median age was 56 [43-65] years, 10 (42%) patients resided at a facility prior to admission, 5 (21%) had a chronic tracheostomy, 18 (75%) were in the intensive care unit at the time of culture collection, and median infection-related length of stay was 12 [7-15] days. Clinical and microbiological cures were achieved in 75% of patients. Overall infection-related mortality was 21%. Our study demonstrated a high rate of colistin heteroresistance in clinical isolates of colistin-susceptible A. baumannii, although this was not associated with suboptimal clinical outcomes due to the use of aggressive colistin dosing and combination therapy. Further studies are needed to establish the association between in vitro colistin heteroresistance and clinical and microbiological outcomes.

The evaluation of safety and efficacy of colistin use in pediatric intensive care unit: Results from two reference hospitals and review of literature

Colistin, an old cationic polypeptide antibiotic, have been reused due to rising incidence of infections caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative microorganisms and the lack of new antibiotics. Therefore, we evaluated safety and efficacy of colistin in treatment of these infections. This study included 104 critically ill children with a median age of 55,9 months between January 2011 and January 2016. Nephrotoxicity occurred in 11 (10.5%) patients. Nephrotoxicity occurred between the third and seventh day of treatment in 63% of colistin induced nephrotoxicity episodes. The subgroup analysis between the patients who developed nephrotoxicity during colistin treatment and those that did not, showed no significant difference in terms of age, underlying disease, cause for PICU admission and type of infection required colistin treatment, P values were 0.615, 0.762, 0.621, 0.803, respectively. All patients were receiving a concomitant nephrotoxic agent (P = 0,355). The majority of the patients (52%) were having primary or secondary immune deficiency in treatment failure group and the most common cause of PICU admission was sepsis in treatment failure group, P values were 0.007 and 0.045, respectively. Mortality attributed to colistin failure and crude mortality were 14.4% and 29.8%, respectively. In conclusion, colistin may have a role in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in critically ill children. However, the patients have to be followed for side effects throughout colistin treatment, not for only early stage. And the clinicians should be aware of increase in the rate of nephrotoxicity in patients those have been receiving a concomitant nephrotoxic agent.

A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Shows that Coadministration of Minocycline with Colistin in Critically Ill Patients Is Associated with Reduced Frequency of Acute Renal Failure

Nonclinical studies have suggested that oxidative damage, caspase-mediated apoptosis, and inducible nitric oxide synthase levels may be involved in the pathogenesis of colistin (CST)-associated acute renal failure. MIN inhibits caspase 1, caspase 3, and inducible nitric oxide synthase, leading to the hypothesis that coadministration of CST with MIN (CST-MIN) may reduce the incidence of acute renal failure as well as produce additive or synergistic antimicrobial effects. A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Premier Research database to examine the impact of CST-MIN on acute renal failure. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age of ≥18 years, intensive care unit admission at CST initiation, primary International Classification of Diseases 9 (ICD-9) diagnosis of pneumonia or sepsis, nondialysis at hospital admission, and discharge between January 2010 and December 2015. ICD-9 code 584.XX or ICD-10 code N17 was used to define acute renal failure. Baseline comparisons, 1:8 propensity score matching, and confirmatory logistic regression analyses were conducted. In total, 4,817 patients received CST and met inclusion criteria; 93 received CST-MIN. Unadjusted frequency of acute renal failure was significantly lower in patients receiving CST-MIN than CST (11.8% versus 23.7%, P = 0.007). Similar results were seen in propensity score matching (12.0% versus 22.3%, P = 0.031) and logistic regression analyses (odds ratio of 0.403, P = 0.006). Mortalities and 30-day readmission rates were similar between groups. The acute renal failure rate was not impacted by prevalence of baseline renal disease. CST-MIN in critically ill patients may reduce CST-associated acute renal failure. Further evaluation of this combination in prospective clinical studies is warranted.

The distribution of carbapenem- and colistin-resistance in Gram-negative bacteria from the Tamil Nadu region in India

PURPOSE

The occurrence of carbapenem- and colistin-resistance among Gram-negative bacteria is increasing worldwide. The aim of this study was to understand the distribution of carbapenem- and colistin-resistance in two areas in Tamil Nadu, India.

METHODOLOGY

The clinical isolates (n=89) used in this study were collected from two diagnostic centres in Tamil Nadu, India. The bacterial isolates were screened for meropenem- and colistin-resistance. Further, resistance genes blaNDM-1, blaOXA-48-like, blaIMP, blaVIM, blaKPC, mcr-1 and mcr-2 and integrons were studied. The synergistic effect of meropenem in combination with colistin was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 89 bacterial isolates were studied which included Escherichia coli (n=43), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=18), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=10), Enterobacter cloacae (n=6), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=5), Klebsiella oxytoca (n=4), Proteus mirabilis (n=2) and Salmonella paratyphi (n=1). MIC testing showed that 58/89 (65 %) and 29/89 (32 %) isolates were resistant to meropenem and colistin, respectively, whereas 27/89 (30 %) isolates were resistant to both antibiotics. Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter cloacae isolates were blaNDM-1-positive (n=20). Some strains of Escherichia coli, K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca were blaOXA-181-positive (n=4). Class 1, 2 and 3 integrons were found in 24, 20 and 3 isolates, respectively. Nine NDM-1-positive Escherichia coli strains could transfer carbapenem resistance via plasmids to susceptible Escherichia coli AB1157. Meropenem and colistin showed synergy in 10/20 (50 %) isolates by 24 h time-kill studies.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight the distribution of carbapenem- and colistin-resistance in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from the Tamil Nadu region in South India.

Anticipating the Unpredictable: A Review of Antimicrobial Stewardship and Acinetobacter Infections

Acinetobacter remains one of the most challenging pathogens in the field of infectious diseases owing primarily to the uniqueness and multiplicity of its resistance mechanisms. This resistance often leads to devastatingly long delays in time to appropriate therapy and increased mortality for patients afflicted with Acinetobacter infections. Selecting appropriate empiric and definitive antibacterial therapy for Acinetobacter is further complicated by the lack of reliability in commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing devices and limited breakpoint interpretations for available agents. Existing treatment options for infections due to Acinetobacter are limited by a lack of robust efficacy and safety data along with concerns regarding appropriate dosing, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets, and toxicity. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are essential to combat this unpredictable pathogen through use of infection prevention, rapid diagnostics, antibiogram-optimized treatment regimens, and avoidance of overuse of antimicrobials. The drug development pipeline includes several agents with encouraging in vitro activity against Acinetobacter, but their place in therapy and contribution to the armamentarium against this pathogen remain to be defined. The objective of this review is to highlight the unique challenge of treating infections due to Acinetobacter and summarize recent literature regarding optimal antimicrobial treatment for this pathogen. The drug development pipeline is also explored for future potentially effective treatment options.

Colistin in Pig Production: Chemistry, Mechanism of Antibacterial Action, Microbial Resistance Emergence, and One Health Perspectives

Colistin (Polymyxin E) is one of the few cationic antimicrobial peptides commercialized in both human and veterinary medicine. For several years now, colistin has been considered the last line of defense against infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Colistin has been extensively used orally since the 1960s in food animals and particularly in swine for the control of Enterobacteriaceae infections. However, with the recent discovery of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance encoded by the mcr-1 gene and the higher prevalence of samples harboring this gene in animal isolates compared to other origins, livestock has been singled out as the principal reservoir for colistin resistance amplification and spread. Co-localization of the mcr-1 gene and Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase genes on a unique plasmid has been also identified in many isolates from animal origin. The use of colistin in pigs as a growth promoter and for prophylaxis purposes should be banned, and the implantation of sustainable measures in pig farms for microbial infection prevention should be actively encouraged and financed. The scientific research should be encouraged in swine medicine to generate data helping to reduce the exacerbation of colistin resistance in pigs and in manure. The establishment of guidelines ensuring a judicious therapeutic use of colistin in pigs, in countries where this drug is approved, is of crucial importance. The implementation of a microbiological withdrawal period that could reduce the potential contamination of consumers with colistin resistant bacteria of porcine origin should be encouraged. Moreover, the management of colistin resistance at the human-pig-environment interface requires the urgent use of the One Health approach for effective control and prevention. This approach needs the collaborative effort of multiple disciplines and close cooperation between physicians, veterinarians, and other scientific health and environmental professionals. This review is an update on the chemistry of colistin, its applications and antibacterial mechanism of action, and on Enterobacteriaceae resistance to colistin in pigs. We also detail and discuss the One Health approach and propose guidelines for colistin resistance management.