A 5-year study of the performance of the Verigene Gram-positive blood culture panel in a pediatric hospital

Performance of molecular tests for diagnosis of bloodstream infections in the clinical setting: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rapid identification of bloodstream pathogens and associated antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles by molecular tests from positive blood cultures (PBCs) have the potential to improve patient management and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of molecular tests from PBCs for detecting pathogens and AMR in the clinical setting.

METHODS

.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Cochrane, conference proceedings, and study bibliographies were searched.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies evaluating DTA of commercially available molecular tests vs. traditional phenotypic identification and susceptibility testing methods in patients with PBCs were eligible.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with PBCs.

TESTS

Commercially available molecular tests.

REFERENCE STANDARD

Traditional phenotypic identification and susceptibility testing methods (standard of care, SOC).

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Study quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Summary DTA outcomes were estimated using bivariate random-effects models for gram-negative bacteria (GNB), gram-positive bacteria (GPB), yeast, GNB-AMR, GPB-AMR, and specific targets when reported by ≥ 2 studies (PROSPERO CRD42023488057).

RESULTS

Seventy-four studies including 24 590 samples were analysed, most of which had a low risk of bias. When compared with SOC, molecular tests showed 92-99% sensitivity, 99-100% specificity, 99-100% positive predictive value, and 97-100% negative predictive value for identifying total GNB (43 studies), GPB (38 studies), yeast (24 studies), GNB-AMR (35 studies), and GPB-AMR (39 studies). For individual pathogen targets, 93-100% sensitivity, 98-100% specificity, 86-100% positive predictive value, and 99-100% negative predictive value were estimated. Five of seven AMR genes had 91-99% sensitivity and 99-100% specificity. Sensitivity was lower for IMP (four studies; 62%; 95% CI, 34-83%) and VIM (four studies; 70%; 95% CI, 38-90%) carbapenemases, where genes were not detected or were not harboured in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (i.e. low prevalence). Performance of molecular tests in detecting AMR was generally comparable when grouped by geographical region (Europe, North America, and East Asia).

DISCUSSION

High DTA support the use of molecular tests in identifying a broad panel of pathogens and detecting AMR in GNB and GPB.

Recent updates in the development of molecular assays for the rapid identification and susceptibility testing of MRSA

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a frequent cause of healthcare- and community-associated infections. Nasal carriage of MRSA is a risk factor for subsequent MRSA infections. Increased morbidity and mortality are associated with MRSA infections and screening and diagnostic tests for MRSA play an important role in clinical management.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted in PubMed and supplemented by citation searching. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of molecular-based methods for MRSA screening and diagnostic tests including individual nucleic acid detection assays, syndromic panels, and sequencing technologies with a focus on their analytical performance.

EXPERT OPINION

Molecular based-assays for the detection of MRSA have improved in terms of accuracy and availability. Rapid turnaround enables earlier contact isolation and decolonization for MRSA. The availability of syndromic panel tests that include MRSA as a target has expanded from positive blood cultures to pneumonia and osteoarticular infections. Sequencing technologies allow detailed characterizations of novel methicillin-resistance mechanisms that can be incorporated into future assays. Next generation sequencing is capable of diagnosing MRSA infections that cannot be identified by conventional methods and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) assays will likely move closer to implementation as front-line diagnostics in the near future.

Test Performance and Potential Clinical Utility of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel

The test performance and potential clinical utility of the ePlex blood culture identification Gram-negative (BCID-GN) panel was evaluated relative to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry on bacterial isolates and conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The majority (106/108, 98.1%) of GN bacteria identified by MALDI were on the BCID-GN panel, and valid tests (107/108, 99.1%) yielded results on average 26.7 h earlier. For all valid tests with on-panel organisms, the positive percent agreement was 102/105 (97.2%) with 3 false negatives and the negative percent agreement was 105/105. Chart review (n = 98) showed that in conjunction with Gram stain results, negative pan-Gram-positive (GP) markers provided the opportunity to discontinue GP antibiotic coverage in 63/98 (64.3%) cases on average 26.2 h earlier. Only 8/12 (66.7%) Enterobacterales isolates with resistance to third-generation cephalosporins harbored the CTX-M gene. In contrast, 8/8 CTX-M⁺ samples yielded a resistant isolate. Detection of 1 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (18 h), 1 OXA23/48⁺ Acinetobacter baumannii (52.4 h), and 3 CTX-M⁺ Enterobacterales isolates on ineffective treatment (47.1 h) and 1 on suboptimal therapy (72.6 h) would have additionally enabled early antimicrobial optimization in 6/98 (6.1%) patients. IMPORTANCE The GenMark Dx ePlex rapid blood culture diagnostic system enables earlier time to identification of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria causing bloodstream infections. Its ability to rule out Gram-positive bacteria enabled early discontinuation of unnecessary antibiotics in 63/98 (64.3%) cases on average 26.2 h earlier. Detection of bacteria harboring the CTX-M gene as well as early identification of highly resistant bacteria such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Acinetobacter baumannii enabled optimization of ineffective therapy in 6/98 (6.1%) patients. Its implementation in clinical microbiology laboratories optimizes therapy and improves patient care.

Diagnosis and Management of Bloodstream Infections With Rapid, Multiplexed Molecular Assays

Bloodstream infection is a major health concern, responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality across the globe. Prompt identification of the responsible pathogen in the early stages of the disease allows clinicians to implement appropriate antibiotic therapy in a timelier manner. Rapid treatment with the correct antibiotic not only improves the chances of patient survival, but also significantly reduces the length of hospital stay and associated healthcare costs. Although culture has been the gold standard and most common method for diagnosis of bloodstream pathogens, it is being enhanced or supplanted with more advanced methods, including molecular tests that can reduce the turnaround time from several days to a few hours. In this article, we describe two rapid, molecular bloodstream infection panels that identify the most common pathogens and associated genetic determinants of antibiotic resistance – the Luminex^® VERIGENE^® Gram-Positive Blood Culture Test and the VERIGENE^® Gram-Negative Blood Culture Test. We conducted a search on PubMed to retrieve articles describing the performance and impact of these tests in the clinical setting. From a total of 48 articles retrieved, we selected 15 for inclusion in this review based on the type and size of the study and so there would be minimum of three articles describing performance and three articles describing the impact post-implementation for each assay. Here we provide a comprehensive review of these publications illustrating the performance and clinical utility of these assays, demonstrating how genotypic tests can benefit diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

Performance of Verigene Rapid Diagnostic Testing for Detection of Inpatient Pediatric Bacteremia

OBJECTIVE

Verigene blood culture panels comprise rapid diagnostic testing, which aids in early bacteremia species identification. This study determined the concordance of Verigene rapid diagnostic results compared with the Vitek reference standard in patients admitted to a children's hospital.

METHODS

This was a 3-year retrospective observational study of neonatal and pediatric patients ≤18 years admitted to a children's hospital with confirmed bacteremia for whom Verigene testing was performed. Verigene testing was conducted on cultures with reported growth on Gram stain and final organism speciation confirmed via Vitek. Percent concordance and positive percent agreement with 95% CIs were calculated for Verigene panel-identifiable organisms. Negative percent agreement with 95% CIs was calculated for non-panel organisms. Time-to-result was calculated from Gram stain reporting to both Verigene and Vitek final organism susceptibility.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-five Gram-positive (GP) and 51 Gram-negative (GN) isolates were identified through Vitek. Verigene GP panel-detectable organisms were correctly identified 96.9% (125/129) at the genus level and 95.3% (123/129) at the species level. Overall positive percent agreement was 95.3 (CI: 90.2-98.3). Negative percent agreement was 83.3 (CI: 35.9-99.6) for the 6 non-panel GP organisms. All GN isolates were correctly identified on Verigene. Median time-to-result was 2.9 hours (IQR 2.6, 3.2) and 44.4 hours (IQR: 35.4, 52.5) for Verigene and final susceptibilities, respectively. There was a statistically significant time savings of 41.5 hours (CI: 29.8-53.2) for identification and detection of resistance markers (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Verigene concordance at our institution aligns with results from previously published studies and can be considered a reliable clinical decision-support tool.

Validation of neonatal and paediatric antimicrobial stewardship treatment algorithms in rapid diagnostic-detected bacteraemia

OBJECTIVES

Blood culture rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) aids in early organism identification and resistance gene detection. This information allows quicker transition to tailored antimicrobial therapy, improved patient outcomes and prevention of antimicrobial resistance. An antimicrobial treatment algorithm based on RDT results and local antibiograms can serve as a valuable clinical decision-support tool. This study assessed the proportion of appropriate antibiotic therapy recommendations using a novel paediatric RDT-guided treatment algorithm compared with standard care (SC) in paediatric bacteraemia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study of admitted paediatric patients who received antibiotics for RDT-confirmed bacteraemia. Appropriateness of SC was compared with algorithm-recommended treatment. Antimicrobial appropriateness was defined as in vitro susceptibility to the organism identified through traditional microbiology. Clinical appropriateness took into consideration the ability to tailor therapy within 12 h of RDT results. Appropriateness was evaluated by two blinded, independent reviewers.

KEY FINDINGS

Eighty-six blood cultures were included with 15 unique Gram-positive and Gram-negative species or genus identified. Comparative antimicrobial appropriateness of SC and algorithm-recommended treatment was 94.2% (81/86) and 100% (86/86), respectively (P = 0.06). Clinical assessment determined 39.5% (34/86) of SC patients were on appropriate therapy within 12 h of RDT result. Algorithm-recommended therapy was clinically appropriate in 97.7% (84/86) of patients (P < 0.001). There was a median time savings of 42.7 h (IQR 40.6, 49.4) for the patients able to be de-escalated as compared with waiting on final sensitivities.

CONCLUSIONS

Algorithm-guided treatment may allow most patients to be de-escalated to organism-tailored therapy earlier in their therapeutic course.

Recent advances in rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems

INTRODUCTION

Until recently antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods based on the demonstration of phenotypic susceptibility in 16-24 h remained largely unchanged.

AREAS COVERED

Advances in rapid phenotypic and molecular-based AST systems.

EXPERT OPINION

AST has changed over the past decade, with many rapid phenotypic and molecular methods developed to demonstrate phenotypic or genotypic resistance, or biochemical markers of resistance such as β-lactamases associated with carbapenem resistance. Most methods still require isolation of bacteria from specimens before both legacy and newer methods can be used. Bacterial identification by MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy is now widely used and is often key to the interpretation of rapid AST results. Several PCR arrays are available to detect the most frequent pathogens associated with bloodstream infections and their major antimicrobial resistance genes. Many advances in whole-genome sequencing of bacteria and fungi isolated by culture as well as directly from clinical specimens have been made but are not yet widely available. High cost and limited throughput are the major obstacles to uptake of rapid methods, but targeted use, continued development and decreasing costs are expected to result in more extensive use of these increasingly useful methods.

Advances in rapid diagnostics for bloodstream infections

Septicemia from bloodstream infections (BSI) is the second largest cause of inpatient mortality and the single most expensive condition for US hospitals to manage. There has been an explosive development of commercial diagnostic systems to accelerate the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of causative pathogens. Despite adoption of advanced technologies like matrix-assisted laser desorption imaging-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and multiplex polymerase chain reaction for rapid identification, clinical impact has been variable, in part due to the persistent need for conventional AST as well as prescriber understanding of these rapidly evolving platforms. Newer technologies are expanding on rapid detection of genotypic determinants of resistance, but only recently has rapid phenotypic AST been available. Yet, improved outcomes with rapid diagnostic platforms are still most evident in conjunction with active antimicrobial stewardship. This review will outline key advancements in rapid diagnostics for BSI and the role of antimicrobial stewardship in this new era.

Novel strategies for rapid identification and susceptibility testing of MRSA

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and increased morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and health-care costs. Rapid diagnosis of MRSA infections has been associated with positive impact on clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

We searched relevant papers in PubMed for the last 10 years. In major papers, we scanned the bibliographies to ensure that important articles were included. This review describes screening and diagnostic test methods for MRSA and their analytical performances with a focus on rapid molecular-based assays including those that are on the horizon. Future novel technologies will allow more rapid detection of phenotypic resistance. In the case of whole-genome sequencing, detection of mutations may predict resistance, transmission, and virulence.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently there are many diagnostic options for the detection of MRSA in surveillance and clinical samples. In general, these are highly accurate and have resulted in improvements in targeted management and reduction in hospital or intensive care unit length of stay for both MSSA and MRSA. Impact on mortality has been variable. Promising novel technologies will not only accurately identify pathogens and detect their resistance markers but will allow discovery of virulence determinants that might further affect patient management.

Impact of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Test in a Children's Hospital Depends on Gram-Positive versus Gram-Negative Organism and Day versus Night Shift

Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) decrease the time to organism identification and resistance detection. RDTs are associated with early deescalation of therapy for Gram-positive BSIs. However, it is less clear how RDTs influence antibiotic management for Gram-negative BSIs and whether RDT results are acted on during off-hours. We performed a single-center, retrospective review of children with BSI and Verigene (VG) testing at a children's hospital. Of the 301 positive cultures included in the study (196 Gram-positive, 44 Gram-negative, 32 polymicrobial, and 29 non-VG targets), the VG result had potential to impact antibiotic selection in 171 cases; among these, antibiotic changes occurred in 119 (70%) cases. For Gram-negative cultures, the Verigene result correlated with unnecessary antibiotic escalation and exposure to broader-spectrum antibiotics than needed. In contrast, for Gram-positive cultures, the VG results correlated with appropriate antibiotic selection. VG results permitted early deescalation for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (19/24 [79%]) and avoidance of antibiotics for skin contaminants (30/85 [35%]). Antibiotic changes occurred more quickly during the day than at night (4.6 versus 11.7 h, respectively; P < 0.05), and antibiotic escalations occurred more quickly than did deescalations (4.1 versus 10.1 h, P < 0.01). In a pediatric institution with a low prevalence of Gram-negative resistance, the VG RDT facilitated antibiotic optimization for Gram-positive BSIs but led to unnecessary escalation of antibiotics for Gram-negative BSIs. The time to action was slower for RDT results reported at night than during the day. Laboratories should consider these factors when implementing blood culture RDTs.

A 'culture' shift: Application of molecular techniques for diagnosing polymicrobial infections

With the advancement of microbiological discovery, it is evident that many infections, particularly bloodstream infections, are polymicrobial in nature. Consequently, new challenges have emerged in identifying the numerous etiologic organisms in an accurate and timely manner using the current diagnostic standard. Various molecular diagnostic methods have been utilized as an effort to provide a fast and reliable identification in lieu or parallel to the conventional culture-based methods. These technologies are mostly based on nucleic acid, proteins, or physical properties of the pathogens with differing advantages and limitations. This review evaluates the different molecular methods and technologies currently available to diagnose polymicrobial infections, which will help determine the most appropriate option for future diagnosis.