Lower esophageal sphincter-preserving laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer: a method for the prevention of reflux esophagitis

A comparative study of laparoscopic near-total and total gastrectomy for patient nutritional status and quality of life using a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of LNTG had small sample sizes and short follow-up periods and did not evaluate quality of life after LNTG. We aimed to compare surgical, oncological, nutritional outcomes, and quality of life of patients after laparoscopic near-total and total gastrectomy (LNTG and LTG, respectively).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed data of 167 and 294 patients who underwent LNTG and LTG, respectively, for treatment of upper or middle third gastric cancer between January 2008 and December 2018. After propensity score matching, the surgical, oncological, and nutritional outcomes of 324 patients were analyzed. Moreover, we measured quality of life after surgery using a postgastrectomy syndrome scale.

RESULTS

The operation time and the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LNTG group than in the LTG group. In addition, patients with anastomotic complications were fewer in the LNTG group. No significant difference was found in the 5-year overall survival rate between the two groups. However, patients in the LNTG group had a significantly smaller body weight loss after 3 months postoperatively. Furthermore, patients in the LNTG group had significantly healthier albumin and cholesterol than those in the LTG group. The mean scores on the postgastrectomy symptom scale at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were higher in the LNTG group than in the LTG group.

CONCLUSION

LNTG is a surgically safe and oncologically favorable method compared with LTG. Furthermore, patients who underwent LNTG had improved nutritional status and quality of life than those who underwent LTG.

Proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction versus total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of proximal gastric cancer in the gastric fundus, cardia, and other parts is increasing rapidly. The purpose of this study was to systematically compare the short-term and long-term clinical effects of proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction (PG-DTR) to total gastrectomy (TG) for proximal early gastric cancer (EGC).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted through searching the literature in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CNKI, WAN FANG, and VIP databases. All clinical controlled trials and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PG-DTR and PG were included. Simultaneously, the relevant data were extracted, and the software RevMan version 5.1 was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eight studies with a total of 753 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, early complications (anastomotic fistula and anastomotic bleeding), late complications (reflux symptoms and anastomotic stenosis), and 5-year survival rate between PG-DTR and TG. However, the levels of partial nutritional indicators (vitamin B12 supplements and vitamin B12 deficiency) were significantly higher in the PG-DTR group than in the TG group.

CONCLUSION

This study showed ample evidence to suggest that PG-DTR improved the postoperative nutritional status without compromising patient safety while providing the same surgical characteristics and postoperative morbidity as TG.

[Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy as a Surgical Treatment for Upper Third Early Gastric Cancer]

Recently, the incidence of upper third gastric cancer has increased, and with it the number of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures performed has been increasing. However, if ESD is not indicated or non-curable, surgical treatment may be necessary. In the case of lower third gastric cancer, it is possible to preserve the upper part of the stomach; however, in the case of upper third gastric cancer, total gastrectomy is still the standard treatment option, regardless of the stage. This is due to the complications associated with upper third gastric cancer, such as gastroesophageal reflux after proximal gastrectomy rather than oncologic problems. Recently, the introduction of the double tract reconstruction method after proximal gastrectomy has become one of the surgical treatment methods for upper third early gastric cancer. However, since there has not been a prospective comparative study evaluating its efficacy, the ongoing multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (KLASS-05) comparing laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction and laparoscopic total gastrectomy is expected to be important for determining the future of treatment of upper third early gastric cancer.

功能保留手术在早期胃癌治疗中的作用

随着人们健康意识的增加和胃镜等医疗诊断技术的不断进步, 早期胃癌的诊断率逐年上升. 早期胃癌的功能保留胃切除术是在根治原发病灶, 行标准淋巴结清扫前提下, 限制胃切除范围, 同时保留幽门及迷走神经功能, 以达到改善患者术后生活质量的目的, 其手术方式包括: 保留幽门的胃切除术, 近端胃切除术, 胃节段切除以及局部切除. 此外, 内镜下黏膜切除术和黏膜剥离也被认为属于功能保留胃切除术范畴. 对于大部分早期胃癌患者, 根治性手术具有良好的治疗效果, 其5年生存率在90%以上. 因此, 在达到手术根治目的的前提下, 保留部分胃的解剖和生理功能, 提高患者术后的生活质量, 对早期胃癌患者具有重要的意义.

Detection and Clinical Significance of COX-2 Gene SNPs in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer has high morbidity and mortality. Identification of patients with high gastric cancer risk at early stage will improve patient prognosis. In this study, we examined two single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites of COX-2 gene in gastric cancer patients and explored the effect of the SNPs on the morbidity of gastric cancer. We found that the SNPs COX-2-1195G/A and COX-2-8473T/C are correlated with the occurrence of gastric cancer, and the patients with variants A and C of the SNPs are liable to have gastric cancer. Our study provides a potential method for screening of susceptible population of gastric cancer for early-stage intervention in patients.

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer

The incidence of proximal early gastric cancer (EGC) is increasing, and while laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) has been performed as a surgical option, it is not yet the standard treatment, because there is no established common reconstruction method following proximal gastrectomy (PG). We reviewed the English-language literature to clarify the current status and problems associated with LPG in treating proximal EGC. This procedure is considered indicated for EGC located in the upper third of the stomach with clinical T1N0, but not when it can be treated endoscopically. No operative mortality or conversion to open surgery was reported in our review, suggesting that this procedure is technically feasible. The most frequent postoperative complication involved problems with anastomoses, possibly caused by the technical complexity of the reconstruction. Although various reconstruction methods following open PG (OPG) and LPG have been reported, there is no standard reconstruction method. Well-designed multicenter, randomized, controlled, prospective trials to evaluate the various reconstruction methods are necessary.

Ongoing surgical clinical trials on minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: Korea

Since Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) group was activated in 2003, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have finished or are ongoing in Korea to evaluate oncologic safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gastric cancer by KLASS group as well as other expert surgeons. MIS in gastric cancer is regarded as one of standard treatment modality for early gastric cancer (EGC) and the indication is going expansion with the accumulation of evidence. This review covers current status of ongoing clinical trials on MIS for gastric cancer in Korea.

A newly modified esophagogastrostomy with a reliable angle of His by placing a gastric tube in the lower mediastinum in laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

An optimal reconstruction method for proximal gastrectomy (PG) remains elusive. Esophagogastrostomy (EG) is technically simple but suffers from the disadvantage of gastroesophageal reflux. Jejunal interposition (JI) has a low rate of gastroesophageal reflux, but the procedure is more complicated, and delayed gastric emptying is a problem.

METHODS

We created a modified EG and have used the modified technique for PG since 2006. The procedure involves shaping the remnant stomach into a gastric conduit. The EG is performed high on the anterior wall, and the conduit is kept straight by applying a circular stapler inserted from the anterior wall of the antrum. The tip of the gastric conduit is then inserted into the lower mediastinum, creating a sharp angle of His. In this retrospective cohort study, the clinical and physiological outcomes were compared between 25 patients who underwent this procedure and 21 patients who underwent JI from 2001 to 2005.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic procedures were performed more frequently, and residual food and bile reflux were less common in the EG group than in the JI group. No significant differences in remnant gastritis or reflux esophagitis were observed between the two groups. However, the late complication of intestinal obstruction occurred only in the JI group.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified EG technique has advantages over the JI technique because of its simplicity and low incidence of residual food and bile reflux. The next step would be to explore this technique further by a prospective multi-institutional study to confirm the reproducibility of its benefits. Miniabstract: The modified EG technique has advantages over the JI technique because of its simplicity, high rate of laparoscopy use, and low incidence of gastroesophageal reflux.

Clinical Outcome of Modified Laparoscopy-Assisted Proximal Gastrectomy Compared to Conventional Proximal Gastrectomy or Total Gastrectomy for Upper-Third Early Gastric Cancer with Special References to Postoperative Reflux Esophagitis

Purpose

This study evaluated the functional and oncological outcomes of proximal gastrectomy (PG) in comparison with total gastrectomy (TG) for upper-third early gastric cancer (EGC).

Materials and Methods

The medical records of upper-third EGC patients who had undergone PG (n=192) or TG (n=157) were reviewed. The PG group was further subdivided into patients who had undergone conventional open PG (cPG; n=157) or modified laparoscopy-assisted PG (mLAPG; n=35). Patients who had undergone mLAPG had a longer portion of their intra-abdominal esophagus preserved than patients who had undergone cPG. Surgical morbidity, recurrence, long-term nutritional status, and the incidence of reflux esophagitis were compared between the groups.

Results

The rate of postoperative complications was significantly lower for PG than TG (16.7% vs. 31.2%), but the five-year overall survival rate was comparable between the two groups (99.3% vs. 96.3%). Postoperative levels of hemoglobin and albumin were significantly higher for patients who had undergone PG. However, the incidence of reflux esophagitis was higher for PG than for TG (37.4% vs. 3.7%; P<0.001). mLAPG was related to a lower incidence of reflux esophagitis after PG (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Compared to TG, PG showed an advantage in terms of postoperative morbidity and nutrition, and there was a comparable prognosis between the two procedures. Preserving the intra-abdominal esophagus may lower the incidence of reflux esophagitis associated with PG.

Proximal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) is theoretically a superior choice of minimally-invasive surgery and function-preserving surgery for the treatment of proximal early gastric cancer (EGC) over procedures such as laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), open total gastrectomy (OTG) and open proximal gastrectomy (OPG). However, LPG and OPG are not popular surgical options due to three main concerns: the first, oncological safety; the second, functional benefits; and the third, anastomosis-related late complications (reflux symptoms and anastomotic stricture). Numerous recent studies have concluded that OPG and LPG present similar oncological safety profiles and improved functional benefits when compared with OTG and LTG. While OPG with modified esophagogastrostomy does not provide satisfactory results, OPG with modified esophagojejunostomy showed similar rates of anastomosis-related late complications when compared to OTG. At this stage, no standard reconstruction method post-LPG exists in the clinical setting. We recently showed that LPG with double tract reconstruction (DTR) is a superior choice over LTG for proximal EGC in terms of maintaining body weight and preventing anemia. However, as there is no definitive evidence in favor of LPG with DTR, a randomized clinical trial comparing LPG with DTR to LTG was recommended. This trial, the Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study-05 (NCT01433861), is expected to assist surgeons in choice of surgical approach and strategy for patients with proximal EGC.