A randomized trial to determine the diagnostic accuracy of conventional vs. jumbo forceps biopsy of gastric epithelial neoplasias before endoscopic submucosal dissection; open-label study

Success rate of current human-derived gastric cancer organoids establishment and influencing factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Human-derived gastric cancer organoids (GCOs) are widely used in gastric cancer research; however, the culture success rate is generally low.

AIM

To explore the potential influencing factors, and the literature on successful culture rates of GCOs was reviewed using meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched for studies. Two trained researchers selected the studies and extracted data. STATA 17.0 software was used for meta-analysis of the incidence of each outcome event. The adjusted Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to detect publication bias. Subgroup analyses were conducted for sex, tissue source, histological classification, and the pathological tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) cancer staging system.

RESULTS

Eight studies with a pooled success rate of 66.6% were included. GCOs derived from women and men had success rates of 67% and 46.7%, respectively. GCOs from surgery or biopsy/endoscopic submucosal dissection showed success rates of 70.9% and 53.7%, respectively. GCOs of poorly-differentiated, moderately-differentiated and signet-ring cell cancer showed success rates of 64.6%, 31%, and 32.7%, respectively. GCOs with pTNM stages I-II and III-IV showed success rates of 38.3% and 65.2%, respectively. Y-27632 and non-Y-27632 use showed success rates of 58.2% and 70%, respectively. GCOs generated with collagenase were more successful than those constructed with Liberase TH and TrypLE (72.1% vs 71%, respectively). EDTA digestion showed a 50% lower success rate than other methods (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

GCO establishment rate is low and varies by sex, tissue source, histological type, and pTNM stage. Omitting Y-27632, and using Liberase TH, TrypLE, or collagenase yields greater success than EDTA.

Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies Between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

The standard of practice when a superficial lesion was identified during upper GI endoscopy is to take an endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) of the lesion. The histopathologic findings then will determine the management plan. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en-bloc resection for early neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and provides an adequate specimen that permits a more reliable histopathologic assessment. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and specimens resected by ESD, and to identify the predisposing risk factors for this discordance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study, enrolling patients with superficial gastric neoplasms that underwent EFB followed by ESD. We divided cases to concordant or discordant group according to the histopathologic diagnosis of EFB and ESD specimens. We also analyzed the features that may have influenced the occurrence of histopathologic discordance and the association between discordant samples of adenocarcinoma and neoplastic invasion to deeper layers.

RESULTS

A total of 115 gastric ESD procedures were performed with 84 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Histopathologic discordance between EFB and ESD specimens were observed in 35.8% of cases (30/84 lesions). The univariant-bivariant analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that histologic discordance was closely related to the size of the lesions ( P =0.028).

CONCLUSION

Histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and ESD specimens may occur in approximately one-third of cases, particularly for lesions over 20 mm, which may lead to crucial delays in gastric cancer precise diagnosis and treatment.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for upgraded pathology in patients with gastric intraepithelial neoplasia after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The pathological results of endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) are frequently inconsistent with those after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN). The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for upgraded pathology after ESD in the Wannan region of Anhui Province, in order to guide the best clinical treatment of GIN.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were used to investigate the independent risk factors for pathology upgrade between EFB and ESD.

RESULTS

In total, 215 patients who were initially diagnosed with GIN from EFB and subsequently received treatment with ESD were eventually selected for analysis. Age >60 years, a lesion located in upper 2/3 of the stomach, a lesion size of >2 cm, a lesion surface with redness and nodules and a lesion with irregular or absent microglands were significantly associated with the upgraded group after ESD. Multivariate analysis suggested that a lesion size of >2 cm (odds ratio [OR], 1.499; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.222-1.909; P=0.026), a lesion surface with redness (OR, 1.508; 95%CI, 1.260-1.993; P=0.048) and nodules (OR, 1.390; 95%CI, 1.195-1.778; P=0.008) were independent predictors for the upgraded group.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with suspected GIN by EFB, a lesion size of >2 cm, a lesion surface with redness and nodules should be taken into account before deciding on the ESD.

Quality in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the detection and surveillance of gastric cancer precursor lesions: Position paper of AEG, SEED and SEAP

This position paper, sponsored by the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología [Spanish Association of Gastroenterology], the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva [Spanish Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Society] and the Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica [Spanish Anatomical Pathology Society], aims to establish recommendations for performing an high quality upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the screening of gastric cancer precursor lesions (GCPL) in low-incidence populations, such as the Spanish population. To establish the quality of the evidence and the levels of recommendation, we used the methodology based on the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). We obtained a consensus among experts using a Delphi method. The document evaluates different measures to improve the quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in this setting and makes recommendations on how to evaluate and treat the identified lesions. We recommend that upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for surveillance of GCPL should be performed by endoscopists with adequate training, administering oral premedication and use of sedation. To improve the identification of GCPL, we recommend the use of high definition endoscopes and conventional or digital chromoendoscopy and, for biopsies, NBI should be used to target the most suspicious areas of intestinal metaplasia. Regarding the evaluation of visible lesions, the risk of submucosal invasion should be evaluated with magnifying endoscopes and endoscopic ultrasound should be reserved for those with suspected deep invasion. In lesions amenable to endoscopic resection, submucosal endoscopic dissection is considered the technique of choice.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of gastric adenocarcinoma

Gastric adenocarcinoma carries a poor prognosis, in part due to the late stage of diagnosis. Risk factors include Helicobacter pylori infection, family history of gastric cancer-in particular, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer and pernicious anaemia. The stages in the progression to cancer include chronic gastritis, gastric atrophy (GA), gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) and dysplasia. The key to early detection of cancer and improved survival is to non-invasively identify those at risk before endoscopy. However, although biomarkers may help in the detection of patients with chronic atrophic gastritis, there is insufficient evidence to support their use for population screening. High-quality endoscopy with full mucosal visualisation is an important part of improving early detection. Image-enhanced endoscopy combined with biopsy sampling for histopathology is the best approach to detect and accurately risk-stratify GA and GIM. Biopsies following the Sydney protocol from the antrum, incisura, lesser and greater curvature allow both diagnostic confirmation and risk stratification for progression to cancer. Ideally biopsies should be directed to areas of GA or GIM visualised by high-quality endoscopy. There is insufficient evidence to support screening in a low-risk population (undergoing routine diagnostic oesophagogastroduodenoscopy) such as the UK, but endoscopic surveillance every 3 years should be offered to patients with extensive GA or GIM. Endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection of visible gastric dysplasia and early cancer has been shown to be efficacious with a high success rate and low rate of recurrence, providing that specific quality criteria are met.

Risk of multiple early gastric cancers in a patient with precursor lesions and endoscopic surveillance for 7 years: A case report

RATIONALE

Severe mucosal atrophy or intestinal metaplasia is a risk factor for synchronous and metachronous intestinal gastric cancer. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging was useful for assessing differentiated early gastric cancer (EGC).

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 62-year-old Chinese female was diagnosed with 5 multiple EGCs or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) with endoscopic surveillance for 7 years.

DIAGNOSES

Synchronous and metachronous multiple EGCs.

INTERVENTIONS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with en bloc resection was performed for all 5 multiple lesions. The ESD specimens were pathologically diagnosed with adenocarcinoma confined to the mucosa or HGD.

OUTCOMES

After endoscopy resection, no residual, recurrent, or synchronous lesions were detected by endoscopic surveillance after ESD.

LESSONS

Long-term, meticulous endoscopic surveillance is needed to monitor risk factors associated with multiple EGCs in patients with severe mucosal atrophy or intestinal metaplasia despite successful Helicobacter pylori eradication.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric indefinite for neoplasia: which lesions should be resected?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The management plan for gastric indefinite for neoplasia is undetermined, and endoscopic forceps biopsy might be inconclusive in ascertaining whether a resection is required. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric indefinite for neoplasia and to identify the factors highly predictive of true neoplasia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in a single, tertiary, referral hospital between November 2008 and December 2015. A total of 109 gastric indefinite for neoplasia lesions from endoscopic forceps biopsy that were resected by ESD were included in the study. The clinical outcomes and endoscopic factors for prediction of true neoplasia were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients (90.8%) were diagnosed with definite neoplasia after ESD and were classified as category 3 (n = 42), category 4 (n = 50), and category 5 (n = 7) according to the revised Vienna classification. The mean age of the patients was 65.8 ± 9.8 years. The mean lesion size was 10.7 ± 6.1 mm. The patient population predominantly consisted of male patients (70.6%). The en bloc and complete endoscopic resection rates were 98.2% and 94.5%, respectively. Factors associated with true neoplastic lesions were male sex (odds ratio [OR] 8.596, p = 0.008) and lesion size ≥ 5 mm (OR 11.355, p = 0.003). Factors associated with category 4-5 were male sex (OR 3.165, p = 0.021) and erosive change (OR 2.841, p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection for indefinite for neoplasia with larger lesions size and erosive changes, especially in males, should be considered when possible.

Treatment for gastric ‘indefinite for neoplasm/dysplasia’ lesions based on predictive factors

BACKGROUND

Gastric ‘indefinite for neoplasm/dysplasia’ (IFND) is a borderline lesion that is difficult to diagnose as either regenerative or neoplastic. There is a need for guidance in the identification of a subset of patients, who have an IFND lesion with a higher risk of malignant potential, to enable risk stratification and optimal management.

AIM

To determine the clinical and pathologic factors for the accurate diagnosis of gastric IFND lesions.

METHODS

In total, 461 gastric lesions diagnosed via biopsy as IFND lesions were retrospectively evaluated. Endoscopic resection (n = 134), surgery (n = 22), and follow-up endoscopic biopsy (n = 305) were performed to confirm the diagnosis. The time interval from initial biopsy to cancer diagnosis was measured, and diagnostic delays were categorized as > 2 wk, > 2 mo, > 6 mo, and > 1 year. The IFND lesions presenting as regenerating atypia (60%) or atypical epithelia (40%) at initial biopsy were adenocarcinomas in 22.6%, adenomas in 8.9%, and gastritis in 68.5% of the cases.

RESULTS

Four clinical factors [age ≥ 60 years (2.445, 95%CI: 1.305-4.580, P = 0.005), endoscopic size ≥ 10 mm (3.519, 95%CI: 1.891-6.548, P < 0.001), single lesion (5.702, 95%CI: 2.212-14.696, P < 0.001), and spontaneous bleeding (4.056, 95%CI: 1.792-9.180, P = 0.001)], and two pathologic factors [atypical epithelium (25.575, 95%CI: 11.537-56.695, P < 0.001], and repeated IFND diagnosis [6.022, 95%CI: 1.822-19.909, P = 0.003)] were independent risk factors for gastric cancer. With two or more clinical factors, the sensitivity and specificity for carcinoma were 91.3% and 54.9%, respectively. Ten undifferentiated carcinomas were initially diagnosed as IFND. In the subgroup analysis, fold change (5.594, 95%CI: 1.458-21.462, P = 0.012) predicted undifferentiated or invasive carcinoma in the submucosal layers or deeper. Diagnostic delays shorter than 1 year were not associated with worse prognoses. Extremely well-differentiated adenocarcinomas accounted for half of the repeated IFND cases and resulted in low diagnostic accuracy even on retrospective blinded review.

CONCLUSION

More than two clinical and pathologic factors each had significant cut-off values for gastric carcinoma diagnosis; in such cases, endoscopic resection should be considered.

Endoscopic small-capacity forceps increase the pathological diagnosis of gastric indefinite neoplasia

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A definitive biopsy-based diagnosis of gastric cancer is sometimes difficult, and some cases are pathologically diagnosed as gastric indefinite neoplasia (GIN). The most appropriate forceps size for gastric biopsy has yet to be determined. In this study, we investigated the relation between the forceps size and the frequency of GIN diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of patients from two historical groups were reviewed. The first group comprised patients evaluated during the period when standard biopsy forceps (StF) were used (April 2010-March 2011), and the second group comprised patients evaluated during the period when small biopsy forceps (SmF) were used (April 2011-March 2013). Patients in whom GIN lesions were diagnosed with biopsy were identified, and pertinent data were compared between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

Among the 8,420 patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) during the first period, 2,584 (30.7%) underwent gastric biopsy with StF. Among the 15,968 patients who underwent EGD during the second period, 4,204 (26.3%) underwent gastric biopsy with SmF. GIN was diagnosed in a significantly greater number of patients in the SmF group than in the StF group (52 [1.25%] vs. 19 [0.73%]; p=0.048). The mean minor-axis lengths of the biopsy samples were 1.50±0.50 mm and 1.38±0.40 mm in the StF group and the SmF group, respectively, with the SmF group samples tending to be shorter (p=0.088).

CONCLUSION

Because the SmF use may increase the rate of GIN diagnosis, the use of SmF with a standard-caliber endoscope should be avoided.

Pathologic outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasia

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely implemented for the treatment of gastric superficial neoplasia. However, the final pathologic diagnosis after ESD may be different from that indicated by the results of endoscopic forceps biopsy. This study identified risk factors for gastric epithelial lesions so that early gastric cancer (EGC) could be diagnosed after ESD.From December 2008 to January 2017, 1541 lesions (1410 patients) diagnosed as initial adenoma or indefinite for neoplasia by endoscopic forceps biopsy were enrolled. The EGC rate and factors predicting upstaged diagnoses were analyzed retrospectively.The diagnostic discrepancy rate was 31.1%. Upstaged and downstaged diagnostic rates after ESD were 23.8% and 7.3%, respectively. The upstaged diagnosis rate for EGC was 18.8%. Gross depression (OR, 16.017) and surface redness (OR, 22.136) were significantly associated with EGC and lesions indefinite for neoplasia during the initial endoscopic forceps biopsy. Central depression (OR, 2.959), nodular surface (OR, 6.581), and surface redness (OR, 6.399) were significantly associated with EGC and lesions with low-grade dysplasia during the initial endoscopic forceps biopsy. Central depression (OR, 1.999), nodular surface (OR, 1.733), surface redness (OR 2.283), lesion location (upper third of the stomach) (OR, 3.989), and tumor size ≥10 mm (OR, 2.200) were significantly associated with EGC and lesions with high-grade dysplasia during the initial endoscopic forceps biopsy.Central depression, nodular surface, surface redness, lesion location, and tumors >10 mm were associated with EGC. Gastric epithelial lesions with these characteristics require attention before ESD.

Predictors of upstage diagnosis after endoscopic resection of gastric low-grade dysplasia

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of precursor lesions such as gastric low-grade dysplasia is crucial in order to improve gastric cancer-related mortality. However, there are no universally accepted management guidelines regarding which lesions should be resected or should be monitored by follow-up visits.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 1006 gastric low-grade dysplasia lesions that had been resected via endoscopic submucosal dissection. We also evaluated the endoscopic risk factors associated with upstage diagnosis from low-grade dysplasia to high-grade dysplasia or gastric cancer.

RESULTS

The mean age of our patients was 63.7 ± 9.1 years and 70.3% of our study population included men. The predominant location and gross type of lesions was the lower third of the stomach (78.6%) and the elevated type (57.8%), respectively. The rates of pathological concordance, upstage, and downstage diagnosis were 85.3, 12.1, and 2.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age and sex, showed that a lesion size ≥ 10 mm (Odds ratio [OR] 2.231; p = 0.003), erythema (OR 7.315; p < 0.001), nodularity (OR 5.589; p < 0.001), depression (OR 3.024; p = 0.002), and erosion (OR 7.680; p < 0.001) were all factors significantly associated with upstage diagnosis. Furthermore, an increasing number of risk factors was associated with an increasing frequency of upstage diagnosis; if there were no risk factors, then there was no upstage diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified several risk factors that were significantly associated with the upstage diagnosis of gastric low-grade dysplasia: lesion size ≥ 10 mm and a variety of surface changes (erythema, nodularity, depression, and erosion). Our data indicate that if there is no evidence of these endoscopic risk factors, then regular follow-up may be considered, according to the patient's combined comorbid conditions.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional Forceps Biopsy Compared to ESD

Objective

conventional forceps biopsy (CFB) is the most popular way to screen for gastric epithelial neoplasia (GEN). Our study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy between conventional forceps biopsy and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Methods

105 patients diagnosed GEN finally undertook ESD in our hospital were enrolled. We retrospectively assessed the characteristics of pathological results of CFB and ESD.

Results

The overall pathologic concordance rate between the CFB and ESD specimens was 68.57%. 55 cases of CFB maintained low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) under ESD,18 cases (23.1%) diagnosis for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), 5 cases (6.4%) diagnosis for cancer. Moreover, 10 cases of CFB maintained HGIN under ESD. Lesions with surface hyperemia (44.4% vs. 27.54%) or surface ulcer (57.14% vs.26.76%) were more likely to cancerate (P<0.05).

Conclusion

endoscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, may exist or progression to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, some may have cancer, should take active treatment measures.

Retrospective study: The diagnostic accuracy of conventional forceps biopsy of gastric epithelial compared to endoscopic submucosal dissection (STROBE compliant)

Conventional forceps biopsy (CFB) is the most popular way to screen for gastric epithelial neoplasia (GEN) and adenocarcinoma of gastric epithelium. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy between conventional forceps biopsy and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).Four hundred forty-four patients who finally undertook ESD in our hospital were enrolled from Jan 1, 2009 to Sep 1, 2015. We retrospectively assessed the characteristics of pathological results of CFB and ESD.The concordance rate between CFB and ESD specimens was 68.92% (306/444). Men showed a lower concordance rate (63.61% vs 79.33%; P = 0.001) and concordance patients were younger (P = 0.048). In multivariate analysis, men significantly had a lower concordance rate (coefficient -0.730, P = 0.002) and a higher rate of pathological upgrade (coefficient -0.648, P = 0.015). Locations of CFB did not influence the concordance rate statistically.The concordance rate was relatively high in our hospital. According to our analysis, old men plus gastric fundus or antrum of CFB were strongly suggested to perform ESD if precancerous lesions were found. And young women with low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia could select regular follow-up.

Understanding the diagnostic yield of current endoscopic biopsy for gastric neoplasm: A prospective single-center analysis based on tumor characteristics stratified by biopsy number and site

Although there are general guidelines on endoscopic biopsy for diagnosing gastric neoplasms, they are predominantly based on outdated literature obtained with fiberscopes without analyses specific to tumor characteristics.This study aims to comprehensively characterize the contemporary endoscopic biopsy by determining the diagnostic yield across different lesion morphologies and histological stages, especially exploring how the number and site of biopsy may influence the overall yield.Biopsy samples from suspected gastric neoplasms were collected prospectively from May 2011 to August 2014 in a tertiary care medical center. A standardized methodology was used to obtain a total of 6 specimens from 2 defined sites per lesion. Rate of positive diagnosis based on the biopsy number and site was assessed for specific gastric lesion morphologies and histological stages.A total of 1080 biopsies from 180 pathologically diagnosed neoplastic lesions in 176 patients were obtained during the study. For depressed/ulcerative and polypoid lesions, the yield was already >99% by the fourth biopsy without further gain from additional biopsies. Lower overall yield was observed for infiltrative lesions (57.1% from 4 biopsies). The site of biopsy did not influence the diagnostic yield except for with infiltrative lesions in which biopsies from thickened mucosal folds were of higher yield than erosive regions.Obtaining 4 specimens may be sufficient for accurate diagnosis of a depressed/ulcerative or polypoid gastric lesion regardless of its histological stage. For infiltrative lesions, at least 5 to 6 biopsies per lesion with more representative sampling from thickened mucosal folds may be preferable.

Diagnosis and management of gastric dysplasia

Gastric dysplasia is a neoplastic lesion and a precursor of gastric cancer. The Padova, Vienna, and World Health Organization classifications were developed to overcome the discrepancies between Western and Japanese pathologic diagnoses and to provide a universally accepted classification of gastric epithelial neoplasia. At present, the natural history of gastric dysplasia is unclear. Much evidence suggests that patients with high-grade dysplasia are at high risk of progression to carcinoma or synchronous carcinoma. Therefore, endoscopic resection is required. Although patients with low-grade dysplasia have been reported to be at low risk of progression to carcinoma, due to the marked histologic discrepancies between forceps biopsy and endoscopic specimens, endoscopic resection for this lesion is recommended, particularly in the presence of other risk factors (large size; depressed gross type; surface erythema, unevenness, ulcer, or erosion; and tubulovillous or villous histology). Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with dysplasia after endoscopic resection appear to reduce the incidence of metachronous lesions.

How Commonly Is the Diagnosis of Gastric Low Grade Dysplasia Upgraded following Endoscopic Resection? A Meta-Analysis

Gastric dysplasia is a well-known precancerous lesion. Though the diagnosis of gastric low grade dysplasia (LGD) is generally made from endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB), the accuracy is doubtful after numerous EFB-proven gastric LGD were upgraded to gastric high grade dysplasia (HGD) or even carcinoma (CA) by further diagnostic test with the procedure of endoscopic resection (ER). We aimed to evaluate the upgraded diagnosis rate (UDR) and the risk factors by ER in EFB-proven gastric LGD lesions. Two investigators independently searched studies reporting the UDR by ER in EFB-proven gastric LGD lesions from databases and analyzed the overall UDR, HGD-UDR and CA-UDR. The pooled UDR by ER in EFB-proven gastric LGD lesions was 25.0% (95% CI, 20.2%-29.8%), made up of HGD-UDR and CA-UDR by rates of 16.7% (95% CI, 12.8%-20.6%) and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.6%) respectively. Lesion size larger than 2 cm, surface with depression and nodularity under endoscopic examinations were the major risk factors associated with UDR. In conclusion, one quarter of EFB-proven gastric LGD lesions will be diagnosed as advanced lesions, including gastric HGD (16.7%) and gastric CA (6.9%) by ER. The diagnosis of those LGD lesions with an endoscopic diameter larger than 2cm, and depressed or nodular surface are more likely to be upgraded after ER.